|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Organophosphorus pesticide self-poisoning is an important clinical problem in rural regions of the developing world, and kills an estimated 200 000 people every year. Unintentional poisoning kills far fewer people but is a problem in places where highly toxic organophosphorus pesticides are available. Medical management is difficult, with case fatality generally more than 15%. We describe the limited evidence that can guide therapy and the factors that should be considered when designing further clinical studies. 50 years after first use, we still do not know how the core treatments—atropine, oximes, and diazepam—should best be given. Important constraints in the collection of useful data have included the late recognition of great variability in activity and action of the individual pesticides, and the care needed cholinesterase assays for results to be comparable between studies. However, consensus suggests that early resuscitation with atropine, oxygen, respiratory support, and fluids is needed to improve oxygen delivery to tissues. The role of oximes is not completely clear; they might benefit only patients poisoned by specific pesticides or patients with moderate poisoning. Small studies suggest benefit from new treatments such as magnesium sulphate, but much larger trials are needed. Gastric lavage could have a role but should only be undertaken once the patient is stable. Randomised controlled trials are underway in rural Asia to assess the effectiveness of these therapies. However, some organophosphorus pesticides might prove very difficult to treat with current therapies, such that bans on particular pesticides could be the only method to substantially reduce the case fatality after poisoning. Improved medical management of organophosphorus poisoning should result in a reduction in worldwide deaths from suicide.
Organophosphorus pesticide self-poisoning is a major clinical and public-health problem across much of rural Asia.1–3 Of the estimated 500 000 deaths from self-harm in the region each year,4 about 60% are due to pesticide poisoning.3 Many studies estimate that organophosphorus pesticides are responsible for around two-thirds of these deaths5—a total of 200 000 a year.3 Deaths from unintentional organophosphorus poisoning are less common than those from intentional poisoning6 and seem to be more common in regions where highly toxic organophosphorus pesticides (WHO Class I toxicity) are available.7,8 In a large cohort of Sri Lankan patients poisoned with WHO Class II organophosphorus pesticides,9,10 no deaths resulted from unintentional poisoning (Eddleston M, unpublished).
Hospitals in rural areas bear the brunt of this problem, seeing many hundreds of patients poisoned by pesticides each year, with a case fatality of 15–30%.5,11 Unfortunately, these hospitals are frequently not adequately staffed or equipped to deal with these very sick patients—intensive care beds and ventilators are in short supply—so even unconscious patients are managed on open wards (figure 1). Furthermore, the evidence for treatment is weak12 and if evidence of benefit does exist for particular antidotes, they are poorly used13–15 or unavailable.3
Improved medical management and provision of antidotes and intensive care beds, together with bans on the most toxic pesticides,16 should reduce the case fatality for self-poisoning and noticeably reduce the number of deaths from self-harm in rural Asia.3,12
Organophosphorus pesticides inhibit esterase enzymes, especially acetylcholinesterase (EC 188.8.131.52) in synapses and on red-cell membranes, and butyrylcholinesterase (EC 184.108.40.206) in plasma.17 Although acute butyrylcholinesterase inhibition does not seem to cause clinical features, acetylcholinesterase inhibition results in accumulation of acetylcholine and overstimulation of acetylcholine receptors in synapses of the autonomic nervous system, CNS, and neuromuscular junctions.17 The subsequent autonomic, CNS, and neuromuscular features of organophosphorus poisoning are well known (panel 1).
Features due to overstimulation of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in the parasympathetic system
Features due to overstimulation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the sympathetic system
Features due to overstimulation of nicotinic and muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in the CNS
Features due to overstimulation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors at the neuromuscular junction
Patients can suddenly develop peripheral respiratory failure while conscious after seemingly recovering from cholinergic crisis, which is termed type II respiratory failure or intermediate syndrome.21,22 This syndrome is an important cause of death in patients who have been resuscitated and stabilised on admission to hospital.
Diagnosis is made on the basis of clinical suspicion, the characteristic clinical signs, smell of pesticides or solvents, and reduced butyrylcholinesterase or acetylcholinesterase activity in the blood.17 Patients with severe organophosphorus poisoning typically present with pinpoint pupils, excessive sweating, reduced consciousness, and poor respiration. The major differential diagnosis is carbamate poisoning, which is clinically indistinguishable.18
Diagnosis of organophosphorus poisoning should ideally be confirmed with an assay to measure butyrylcholinesterase activity in plasma (or acetylcholinesterase in whole blood).17 However, the results of such assays are rarely available in time to affect clinical decisionmaking. Their importance is for guidance of clinical research; understanding of their limitations is essential for interpretation of studies looking at individual pesticides and specific interventions.
Unfortunately, much confusion exists about the use and interpretation of these assays (panel 2). Some pesticides inhibit butyrylcholinesterase more effectively than they inhibit acetylcholinesterase.9 Butyrylcholinesterase activity does not relate to severity of poisoning; however, it can be used as a sensitive marker of exposure to most organophosphorus compounds or other cholinesterase-inhibiting compounds, and for measuring organophosphorus elimination from the body (figure 2).
Plasma butyrylcholinesterase assays
Red cell acetylcholinesterase assays
Monitoring a patient's cholinesterase status after organophosphate poisoning enables the verification of substantial exposure to anticholinesterase agents. In future, such assays could facilitate the decision about when to stop oxime treatment and allow cautious weaning of a patient from a ventilator when butyrylcholinesterase activity is increasing. Studies are underway to confirm the clinical usefulness of this approach.
Studies suggest that red-cell acetylcholinesterase is a good marker of synaptic function and atropine needs in patients poisoned with organophosphorus, and is therefore probably a good marker of severity.29,30 Patients with red-cell acetylcholinesterase activity of at least 30% had normal muscle function and no need for atropine. By contrast, patients with less than 10% of normal red-cell acetylcholinesterase activity had grossly deranged muscle function and needed high doses of atropine. Acetylcholinesterase activity between these values was associated with moderate impairment of muscle function and need for atropine.
A major drawback of acetylcholinesterase assays is that the interaction between organophosphorus, acetylcholinesterase, and oximes continues if the sample is left at room temperature for even a few minutes (panel 2). To obtain reliable results, the reaction must be stopped immediately by cooling and dilution of the sample as soon as it is taken from the patient. Otherwise differences of only a few minutes in the time taken to cool a sample will cause notable variation over repeated samples, which makes interpretation difficult.
Treatment includes resuscitation of patients and giving oxygen, a muscarinic antagonist (usually atropine), fluids, and an acetylcholinesterase reactivator (an oxime that reactivates acetylcholinesterase by removal of the phosphate group) (panel 3).35 Respiratory support is given as necessary. Gastric decontamination should be considered only after the patient has been fully resuscitated and stabilised. Patients must be carefully observed after stabilisation for changes in atropine needs, worsening respiratory function because of intermediate syndrome, and recurrent cholinergic features occuring with fat-soluble organophosphorus.
Few randomised trials of such poisoning have been done; consequently the evidence base is restricted.35 Both atropine and oximes were introduced into clinical practice rapidly in the 1950s without clinical trials.36,37 As a result, we do not know the ideal regimens for either therapy. Trials of other interventions are hindered because the best way to give the core treatments has not yet been determined and is highly variable in practice. This variability interferes with development of a widely accepted study protocol and limits the external validity of study results.
The case fatality reported by hospitals varies markedly—from 1·85% in the Posion Control Centre of Mach Mai hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam to 40% in a German intensive-care unit (Pham Due, Personal Communication).38,39 Since so few randomised trials have been done, comparison of effectiveness of therapies given in different hospitals is tempting. Unfortunately, such comparisons are confounded by many factors (panel 4).
The above factors have important consequences for the speed of onset of organophosphorus poisoning after ingestion. Ingestion of an oxon organophosphorus that rapidly inhibits acetylcholinesterase will result in early onset of clinical features and respiratory arrest before presentation to hospital, increasing the risk of hypoxic brain damage and aspiration. The conversion of the thioate organophosphorus parathion to paraoxon is so fast that patients can be unconscious in 20 min. Clinical features after poisoning by other thioate organophosphorus, such as dimethoate and fenthion, happen later, giving the patient more time to present to hospital.
In particular, although many textbooks regard poisoning with various organophosphorus pesticides to be broadly similar and equally responsive to treatment, differences in chemistry have major consequences for treatment efficacy.9,48 The pesticide ingested defines how many patients survive to reach medical attention, how ill they are at admission, effectiveness of oxime therapy, likelihood of recurrent cholinergic crises, or need for respiratory support (panel 4). Such variation reaffirms the importance of randomised trials to measure effectiveness of treatments for specific pesticides.
Severe acute organophosphorus pesticide poisoning is a medical emergency. Treatment must ensure that the patient has a patent airway and adequate breathing and circulation. Ideally, oxygen should be provided at the first opportunity. However, little evidence supports the common advice that atropine must not be given until oxygen is available.17,19,49,50 In hospitals that have no access to oxygen, atropine should be given early to patients with pesticide poisoning to reduce secretions and improve respiratory function.32 The patient should be placed in the left lateral position, with the neck extended. This position reduces risk of aspiration, helps keep the airway patent, and could decrease pyloric emptying and absorption of poison.51,52 Supportive care should include giving fluids and control of blood glucose.
Health-care workers are thought to be at risk of poisoning during initial stabilisation of patients poisoned with organophosphorus.53,54 A few Western hospitals have reported cases of such poisoning, but none have shown inhibition of acetylcholinesterase or butyrylcholinesterase in health-care workers consistent with substantial exposure to organophosphorus.55 Some symptoms, such as headaches and nausea, are possibly due to anxiety or exposure to the organic solvent (eg, xylene) in which the pesticide is mixed.55,56
Hundreds of thousands of patients with severe organophosphorus poisoning are seen every year in basic hospitals across Asia; health-care workers take no special precautions and no cases of secondary poisoning have been reported. Reticence by hospital workers to treat patients poisoned with pesticides puts patients at risk. Guidelines recommend universal precautions, maximum ventilation, and frequent rotation of staff, so that effects of solvent and pesticide are kept to a minimum.55
Although atropine remains the mainstay of therapy worldwide,14,49 other muscarinic antagonists have been studied in animals.49 An important difference between such drugs is their penetration into the CNS.57 Glycopyrronium bromide and hyoscine methobromide do not enter the CNS, but hyoscine has excellent penetration; atropine enters the CNS, but not to the same degree as hyoscine.
The main adverse-effect of atropine is anticholinergic delirium in patients who receive too high a dose.49 Some physicians therefore prefer glycopyrronium to treat the peripheral effects of organophosphorus without causing confusion. However, its poor CNS penetration suggests that it is ineffective at countering coma and reduced respiration seen in patients with the cholinergic syndrome. A small randomised controlled trial comparing glycopyrronium with atropine noted no significant difference in mortality or ventilation rates, but it did not have sufficient power to detect small differences between treatments.58
Hyoscine was used successfully to treat a patient with severe extra-pyramidal features but few peripheral signs.59 Animal studies suggest that it is more effective than atropine for control of seizures induced by inhaled organophosphorus nerve agents.60 However, extra-pyramidal effects and seizures are not common features of organophosphorus poisoning.9,21
Atropine will probably remain the antimuscarinic agent of choice until high-quality randomised trials show another muscarinic antagonist to have a better benefit-to-harm ratio because it is available widely, affordable, and moderately able to penetrate into the CNS. No known randomised controlled trials have compared different regimens of atropine for either loading or continuation therapy. As a result, many different recommendations have been made—a 2004 review noted more than 30 dosing regimens, some of which would take many hours to give the full loading dose of atropine.15
The aim of early therapy is to reverse cholinergic features and to improve cardiac and respiratory function as quickly as possible. We use a regimen of doubling doses18 (panel 2), with the aim of raising the pulse above 80 beats per minute and systolic blood pressure above 80 mm Hg, and rapidly reversing bronchospasm and bronchorrhoea. This regimen allows for as much as 70 mg of atropine to be given in stages to a patient in less than 30 min, resulting in rapid stabilisation and low risk of atropine toxicity.15 A study from south India61 recorded benefit from an infusion of atropine compared with repeated bolus doses, but it used historical controls thus reducing confidence in this finding. Infusions could reduce fluctuations in blood atropine concentration, reducing the need for frequent patient observation, an important benefit in hospitals with few staff.
Oximes reactivate acetylcholinesterase inhibited by oganophosphorus.13 Pralidoxime was discovered in the mid-1950s by Wilson and colleagues, and was soon successfully introduced into clinical practice for patients with parathion poisoning.37 Other oximes, such as obidoxime and trimedoxime, have been developed but pralidoxime remains the most widely used. It has four salts: chloride, iodide, metilsulfate, and mesilate.62 The chloride and iodide salts are used widely, but metilsulfate and mesilate are used mostly in France, Belgium, and the UK. The chloride salt has advantages over iodide—in particular its smaller molecular weight (173 vs 264), which provides 1·5-times more active compound per gram of salt than does iodide. High doses of pralidoxime iodide also puts patients at risk of thyroid toxicity, especially if given for a long period.63
Despite the beneficial effects of pralidoxime first noted with parathion poisoning, its effectiveness has been much debated, with many Asian clinicians unconvinced of its benefit.64–66 In particular, two randomised controlled trials in Vellore, India in the early 1990s noted that low-dose infusions of pralidoxime might cause harm.67,68 The absense of clinical benefit could relate to trial design (suboptimum dose, or bias in allocation). Alternatively, this result could suggest that pralidoxime is ineffective in the patients seen at this hospital, perhaps because of the specific pesticide ingested, the amount ingested, or the patients' long delay before pralidoxime is given.69,70
A Cochrane review71 and two other meta-analyses72,73 of pralidoxime have been published. The Cochrane review included two randomised controlled trials68,69 and reported no clear evidence of benefit or harm. The other meta-analyses combined non-randomised or historically controlled observational studies64,74–78 with randomised controlled trials67,68,79 reducing confidence80,81 in their conclusion that oximes are harmful.
Since these meta-analyses were completed, a randomised controlled trial in Baramati, India82 studied the effect of very-high-dose pralidoxime iodide (2 g loading dose, then 1 g either every hour or every 4 h for 48 h, then 1 g every 4 h until recovery) in 200 patients with moderate organophosphorus poisoning (excluding severely ill patients). The high-dose regimen was associated with reduced case fatality (1% vs 8%; odds ratio [OR] 0·12, 95% CI 0·003–0·90), fewer cases of pneumonia (8% vs 35%; 0·16, 0·06–0·39), and reduced time on mechanical ventilation (median 5 days vs 10 days). Laboratory studies to identify the pesticide ingested and degree of baseline acetylcholinesterase inhibition and subsequent reversal were not done.63 However, this study suggests that large doses of pralidoxime could have benefit if patients are treated early and have good supportive care.
Observational studies of pralidoxime and obidoxime suggest that the ability to reverse acetylcholinesterase inhibition with oximes varies with the pesticide ingested (figure 4).9,13,69,83 Acetylcholinesterase inhibited by diethyl pesticides, such as parathion and quinalphos, seems to be effectively reactivated by oximes, but acetylcholinesterase inhibited by dimethyl organophosphorus, such as monocrotophos or oxydemeton-methyl, seems to respond poorly. We noted that acetylcholinesterase inhibited by S-alkyl-linked organophosphorus, such as profenofos, is not reactivated by oximes at all (figure 4). This difference is probably partly because of variation in the speed of acetylcholinesterase ageing (panel 5) induced by these different pesticides. Interestingly, the Baramati82 study did not find a difference in benefit of high-dose pralidoxime in moderate dimethyl or diethyl organophosphorus poisoning. Further studies are needed to establish whether this benefit remains for severe poisoning.
Inhibited acetylcholinesterase reactivates spontaneously but slowly. The half-life of reactivation varies according to the organophosphorus: if dimethyl, the half-life is about 1 h; if diethyl, the half-life is around 30 h. Oximes speed up this reactivation. Unfortunately, if the organophosphorus is present in high concentrations, newly reactivated acetylcholinesterase will be rapidly reinhibited. Whether reactivation or inhibition predominates depends on the type of organophosphorus and relative concentrations and affinities of organophosphorus and oxime.
Inhibited acetylcholinesterase can also become aged, by loss of one of the two alkyl groups attached to the bound phosphate. Aged acetylcholinesterase cannot be reactivated by oximes. The half-life of ageing varies according to the inhibiting pesticide: if dimethyl, the half-life is around 3 h; if diethyl, the half-life is around 33 h. Thus ageing has important clinical consequences.
If a patient who has ingested a dimethyl pesticide presents to hospital 3 h after ingestion, about 50% of the acetylcholinesterase will already be aged and unresponsive to oximes. A patient arriving after 12 h will have about 94% aged acetylcholinesterase and therefore be unresponsive to oximes. Such a situation is common where patients need to be transferred to a secondary hospital to receive oximes. The situation is better with diethyl pesticides since it takes 33 h for 50% inhibition and oximes can be effective for up to 5 days after ingestion.
Ageing seems to take place much more quickly after poisoning with atypical organophosphorus, such as profenofos, that have neither two methyl groups nor two ethyl groups (figure 3). The half-life of ageing seems to be much less than 1 h, thus oximes are completely ineffective if the patient presents more than an hour or two after ingestion (figure 4).
Interpretation of clinical evidence regarding oximes should take into account this variability in response of different pesticides.69 The clinical effects can also be limited by high concentrations of organophosphorus in the blood after ingestion of a large dose—the pesticide simply re-inhibits any acetylcholinesterase that the oximes reactivate. Oximes will also not be effective for improvement of outcomes if the patient develops severe complications such as aspiration pneumonia or hypoxic brain injury before treatment. Such complications take place most often with fast-acting pesticides such as parathion and dichlorvos.
WHO recommends that oximes be given to all symptomatic patients who need atropine.14,84 To ensure a therapeutic concentration, a loading dose of pralidoxime chloride or obidoxime is given, then a continuous infusion. The loading dose of oxime should not be given rapidly as a bolus because this method causes vomiting (risking aspiration), tachycardia, and diastolic hypertension.13
Patients poisoned with organophosphorus frequently develop agitated delirium. The cause is complex, with contributions from the pesticide itself, atropine toxicity, hypoxia, alcohol ingested with the poison, and medical complications. Although the mainstay of management is prevention or treatment of underlying causes, some patients need pharmacotherapy. Acutely agitated patients will benefit from treatment with diazepam.
Diazepam is first-line therapy for seizures; however, seizures are uncommon in well oxygenated patients with pesticide poisoning.9,48 Seizures seem to be more common with organophosphorus nerve agents (such as soman and tabun).85 Animal studies suggest that diazepam reduces neural damage86 and prevents respiratory failure and death,87 but studies in humans are few.
Gastric lavage is often the first intervention poisoned patients receive on presentation to hospital, sometimes at the expense of resuscitation and giving antidote.88 No evidence shows any form of gastric decontamination to benefit patients poisoned with organophosphorus.35 Gastric decontamination should only be done after the patient has been stabilised and treated with oxygen, atropine, and an oxime.88
Gastric lavage is the most common form of decontamination for organophosphorus poisoning despite the absence of randomised controlled trials to confirm benefit.35 The rate of absorption of organophosphorus from the human bowel is not known; however, with some pesticides, the rapid onset of poisoning in animals89 and humans39 suggests that absorption is rapid, occurring within minutes of ingestion. The time window for effective lavage is therefore probably short. Guidelines for treatment of drug self-poisoning suggest that lavage should be considered only if the patient arrives within 1 hour of ingesting poison.90 The relevance of these guidelines to organophosphorus poisoning is unclear91 but lavage should probably only be considered for patients who present soon after ingestion of a substantial amount of toxic pesticide who are intubated, or conscious and willing to cooperate. Repeated gastric lavages are recommended in China to remove pesticide remaining in the stomach,92 although substantial amounts of organophosphorus are unlikely to remain in the stomach after one lavage.
Ipecacuanha-induced emesis should not be used in organophosphorus pesticide poisoning.35,93 Patients poisoned with organophosphorus can rapidly become unconscious, risking aspiration if ipecacuanha has been given. Mechanically-induced emesis with large quantities of water risks pushing fluid through the pylorus and into the small bowel, probably increasing the rate of absorption.93
A randomised controlled trial of single and multiple doses of superactivated charcoal in Sri Lanka failed to find a significant benefit of either regimen over placebo in more than 1000 patients poisoned with pesticides.94 Because activated charcoal binds organophosphorus in vitro,95 the absence of effect in patients might be due to rapid absorption of pesticide into the blood. Alternatively, the ingested dose in fatal cases could be too large for the amount of charcoal given, the charcoal might be given too late, or the solvent might interfere with binding. No evidence suggests that patients with pesticide poisoning benefit from treatment with activated charcoal.
Current therapy works through only a few mechanisms.96 Several new therapies have been studied but results were inconclusive. However, future research might reveal several affordable therapies working at separate sites that could complement present treatments.
Magnesium sulphate blocks ligand-gated calcium channels, resulting in reduced acetylcholine release from pre-synaptic terminals, thus improving function at neuromuscular junctions, and reduced CNS overstimulation mediated via NMDA receptor activation.97 A trial in people poisoned with organophosphorus pesticides recorded reduced mortality with magnesium sulphate (0/11 [0%] vs 5/34 [14·7%]; p<0·01).98 However, the study was small, allocation was not randomised (every fourth patient received the intervention), and the publication incompletely described the dose of magnesium sulphate used and other aspects of the methodology; therefore these results should be interpreted with caution.
The alpha2-adrenergic receptor agonist clonidine also reduces acetylcholine synthesis and release from presynaptic terminals. Animal studies show benefit of clonidine treatment, especially in combination with atropine, but effects in human beings are unknown.99
Sodium bicarbonate is sometimes used for treatment of organophosphorus poisoning in Brazil and Iran, in place of oximes.100,101 Increases in blood pH (up to 7·45–7·55) have been reported to improve outcome in dogs through an unknown mechanism;102 however, a Cochrane review103 concluded that insufficient evidence exists at present to establish whether sodium bicarbonate should be used in humans poisoned with organophosphorus.
Removing organophosphorus from the blood could allow optimum action of other therapies. The roles of haemodialysis and haemofiltration are not yet clear; however, a recent non-randomised controlled study in China104 suggested a benefit of haemofiltration after poisoning with dichlorvos, which has poor solubility in fat, and therefore should have a relatively small volume of distribution. A systematic review of these therapies in organophosphorus poisoning is underway, but randomised controlled trials will be needed to establish good evidence-based treatment guidelines.
Butyrylcholinesterase scavenges organophosphorus in plasma, reducing the amount available to inhibit acetylcholinesterase in synapses.105 It has been cloned and military research now aims to inject soldiers with the enzyme before exposure to organophosphorus nerve gases.106 Such a prophylactic approach is not practical for self-poisoning with organophosphorus because we cannot predict when a person is going to ingest the pesticide. Turkish doctors107 have reported the use of butyrylcholinesterase in fresh frozen plasma to treat poisoned patients. A small controlled study (12 patients given fresh frozen plasma with 21 control patients) recorded benefit, but this trial was not randomised and allocation decisions were unclear.
Furthermore, whether or not scavenging of organophosphorus by butyrylcholinesterase is the mechanism for any effect of fresh frozen plasma is unclear.108 In fact, butylcholinesterase seems unlikely to ever be an effective treatment for pesticide poisoning since it binds stoichiometrically to organophosphorus and will be overpowered by the amount of pesticide commonly ingested. For example, 50 mL of 40% dimethoate (molecular weight 229) contains 20 g or 87·3 mmol of organophosphorous, which, if completely absorbed and transformed into the oxon, would need an equivalent number of moles of butyrylcholinesterase (molecular weight about 70 kD; therefore 6 kg) for inactivation.
A better approach than use of butylcholinesterase might be to give recombinant bacterial phosphotriesterases, or hydrolases.109,110 These proteins break down organophosphorus pesticides enzymatically and protect animals from pesticide poisoning. Future clinical development of such enzymes could reduce blood concentrations of organophosphorus, allowing optimum activity of other treatments.
Medical management of organophosphorus pesticide poisoning is difficult, especially in resource poor locations where most of these patients present. Clinical practice is frequently less than ideal, with poor initial resuscitation and stabilisation, and poor use of antidotes. However, most of the original research regarding acute organophosphorus poisoning in humans has been published in the past decade, which is a positive development. We expect that in the next decade evidence from continuing research by a number of groups across Asia will finally provide clear guidance on how to treat poisoning with organophosphorus pesticides. Hopefully, this new guidance will include the use of novel antidotes that will reduce the case fatality from pesticide poisoning, and therefore reduce the worldwide number of deaths from self-harm.
We searched for relevant studies by searching PubMed (1960–2006), Embase (1974–2006), UK National Research Register, Cochrane Injuries Group Specialised Register, Clinicaltrials.gov and the Cochrane databases (all until Dec 2006) for “organophosphorus”, “organophosphate”, or “organic phosphorus” and “poisoning” or “toxicity”. We did not limit the search by language; however, we had limited ability to translate papers from China where many studies have been done. Translation of Chinese papers was therefore ordered according to relevance, established by review of English abstracts. We also used information from our continuing studies in Sri Lanka that have recruited more than 2000 patients poisoned with organophosphate, and from discussions with clinicians seeing such patients across Asia.
We thank Lewis Nelson, Yi Li, Nick Bateman, Geoff Isbister, and the Lancet reviewers for their comments on the manuscript and members of the Ox-Col study team and the South Asian Clinical Toxicology Research Collaboration for their work in Sri Lanka. We thank Dr F Worek and Dr H Thiermann of the Bundeswehr Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology for their support of the research in Sri Lanka. This work was funded by a grant to ME (063560MA) from the Wellcome Trust's Tropical Interest Group. The South Asian Clinical Toxicology Research Collaboration (SACTRC) is funded by the Wellcome Trust and Australian National Health and Medical Research Council International Collaborative Research Grant 071669MA.
ME wrote the first draft of this manuscript after detailed discussion with the other authors. All authors contributed to draft revisions and approved the final version.
The authors do not have any financial conflicts of interest associated with writing this review. They have been funded to do observational studies, systematic reviews, and randomised controlled trials of interventions for organophosphorus pesticide poisoning in Sri Lanka over the past 4 years. The results of these studies are cited in this review. ME is a Wellcome Trust Career Development Fellow.