PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of emermedjEmergency Medical JournalVisit this articleSubmit a manuscriptReceive email alertsContact usBMJ
 
Emerg Med J. 2007 September; 24(9): 654–656.
PMCID: PMC2464670

Intubation training in emergency medicine: a review of one trainee's first 100 procedures

Abstract

A review was performed looking at the first 100 intubation procedures performed or solely supervised by one emergency medicine trainee. Over the 5 year period during which the procedures were performed the author performed 93 and supervised 7 procedures. There were 90 rapid sequence intubation procedures and 10 intubations without drugs. The intubation procedure was successful by the author on 94 occasions, 91 of these on the first attempt and 3 on a second attempt. There were 8 complications. These comprised 3 oesophageal intubations and 5 failures to achieve an adequate view. This study suggests that as a trainee gains experience in performing intubation procedures, the nature of the complications arising changes. Initial complications involved misplacement of the tube, whereas later complications involved not obtaining an adequate view, latterly in increasingly difficult airways. Truly difficult airways are not common and may not be experienced until much later in a trainee's career.

The question of when an individual becomes competent at performing a procedural skill such as intubation has been studied in the paramedic population; however, there is no clear consensus yet in the emergency medicine setting. In the USA, the National Paramedic Curriculum requires that a student performs five successful intubations to graduate.1 Wang et al predicted that paramedics required 15 to 20 endotracheal intubations to attain baseline proficiency (predicted success of 90%),2and other studies have suggested even higher numbers are required to attain proficiency.3,4,5,6 Obviously once competency is attained it must be maintained. Again the question of how many procedures must be performed to maintain adequate skill levels has not yet been answered.

The US National Emergency Airway Registry (NEAR) database of emergency department intubation procedures reported an 83% first intubation success rate in emergency department residents (improving from 72% in postgraduate year 1 residents to 93% in postgraduate year 4+ residents) and a surgical cricothyrotomy rate of 0.9% for all residents.7 For all emergency department intubation procedures (including attending procedures), 2.7% required a rescue technique such as rescue rapid sequence intubation (RSI), use of an airway adjunct or a surgical cricothyrotomy (0.6% of all procedures).8

The aim of this study was to review the first 100 intubation procedures performed by an emergency medicine trainee in order to evaluate the process of skill acquisition.

Methods

During a 5 year emergency medicine specialist registrar training programme between 2002 and 2007, the author, a trainee in emergency medicine, prospectively recorded all intubation procedures that he had either performed or was the most senior supervising doctor, for logbook purposes. Data were collected on the age of the patient, the indication for intubation, whether the procedure was successful and on what number attempt, the grade of the procedure as defined by the operator who successfully completed the procedure, the anaesthetic agent used, what complications arose, and who was the most senior supervising individual present at each procedure. Complications were defined as such if they occurred secondarily to the intubation procedure. The author's personal intubation procedure protocol is summarised in table 11.. The data were entered into Microsoft Excel and analysed.

Table thumbnail
Table 1 Summary of author's personal intubation procedure protocol incorporating Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh emergency department's airway protocol

Results

During the study period, the author performed or was the most senior supervising doctor for 100 intubation procedures (table 22).). Data were available for all of these procedures; however, some drugs used in year 1 are missing from the database. Specialised airway training during this period included a 6 month anaesthetic secondment and attendance on the Scottish Airway and Ventilation Emergency (SAVE) course at the Stirling Simulator Centre, both in year 1.

Table thumbnail
Table 2 Summary of intubation procedures for one emergency medicine trainee

The author performed 93 and supervised 7 procedures. There were 90 RSI procedures and 10 intubations without drugs. For 77 procedures, a doctor with more airway experience supervised the author. This was an emergency medicine consultant in 23 procedures, an anaesthetic consultant in 8 procedures and an anaesthetic registrar in 46. In the other 23 procedures, the author operated either alone, with a doctor with less airway experience (that is, anaesthetic SHO) or supervised the procedure without any senior supervision. There was one pre‐hospital procedure.

Of the 100 procedures, the author was successful on 94 occasions, 91 of these on the first attempt and 3 on a second attempt. There were 8 complications of the procedure, which included 6 failed intubations by the author. These are detailed in table 33.. All complications occurred during intubation procedures with drugs. There were 90 grade 1 intubations, as defined by Cormack and Lehane,9 6 grade 2 intubations, and 4 grade 3 intubations. There were no episodes of desaturation (Sao2 <90%) post‐procedure, cardiac arrest post‐procedure, hypotension post‐procedure requiring treatment, trauma to airway, vomiting or regurgitation secondary to the intubation procedure or a requirement for a surgical airway in any of the procedures.

Table thumbnail
Table 3 Summary of the 8 complications during the trainee's first 100 procedures

Discussion

As the author gained experience the complications arising from the procedures changed in nature. Oesophageal intubations occurred on procedures 1, 7 and 12. All oesophageal intubations were immediately recognised and corrected. There were no further oesophageal intubations in any of the next 88 procedures. The other 5 complications were all a failure to achieve an adequate view. In procedures 4, 27, 71, 97 and 99 the author was unable to gain an adequate enough view to allow simple intubation. In the first three of these, the second person performing the procedure was able to gain a better view simply with their intubation technique. No alternative manoeuvres or airway adjuncts were used. In the last two procedures, numbers 97 and 99, the author was only able to obtain a grade 3 view. On both of these occasions, a more experienced practitioner was unable to gain a better view. Both of these patients were then intubated using a blind bougie technique, placing the curved bougie tip in an anterior facing direction just behind the epiglottis and advancing, aiming to pass the bougie through the cords. Both of these patients were successfully intubated on the next attempt using this technique. All patients were routinely assessed using the LEMON method.10 Patient 97 had no adverse airway characteristics. Patient 99 had a reduced thyromental distance, but had no other characteristics suggestive of a difficult airway and no alternative arrangements were made before intubation.

The US NEAR studies have reported a trainee first intubation failure rate of 17%, a trainee failure rate of 10% and a rescue surgical cricothyrotomy rate of 0.9% for all residents.7 Comparative intubation grade data from operating theatres shows that while Cormack and Lehane grades vary between populations, relative frequencies of grades 1 to 4 are about 68–70%, 28–30%, 1.5–2.0% and 0.1%.11,12

It is interesting to note that despite the author being a fairly experienced operator by the later procedures, a true grade 3 intubation was not experienced until procedures 97 and 99, and the author did not have an occasion to resort to a difficult airway algorithm until this point. This has several implications for training. Until the operator has experience in managing difficult airways then a more experienced operator should always be available to call upon. As a trainee, one should always have a senior colleague, either an emergency physician or anaesthetist, present or available to call on in case of problems, and ideally emergency department consultants should also have a colleague nearby to help out if necessary.

The question of how many procedures are required before competence is obtained is obviously difficult and varies from individual to individual. From the author's experience the complication of oesophageal intubation did not disappear until after procedure 12. One could also argue that the author was not able to obtain a view that was classified as grade 1 by an anaesthetic registrar on procedure 71 and therefore sufficient competence had still not been attained. By procedures 97 and 99 the view the author was obtaining was not improved upon by either an anaesthetic registrar or a consultant in emergency medicine. The complication rate improved notably after about 30 procedures in this small study.

The author accepts that one trainee's experience may not be generalisable to emergency trainees in general. In order to see whether a similar pattern of complications is present in all trainees and to determine recommendations for emergency medicine trainees, this study should be performed on a much larger group of trainees. Obviously the action of intubation is only one part of performing an RSI procedure. Information about other skills required for the process, such as choice of suitable patient, equipment preparation and team leadership for example, were not assessed in this study.

Conclusions

As a trainee gains experience in performing intubation procedures, the nature of complications arising changes, with oesophageal intubation complicating the first 20 procedures and difficulty obtaining an optimum view complicating later procedures. The complication rate seems to improve after about 30 procedures. Truly difficult airways are not common and may not be experienced until much later in a trainee's career.

Abbreviations

NEAR - US National Emergency Airway Registry

RSI - rapid sequence intubation

SAVE - Scottish Airway and Ventilation Emergency

Footnotes

Competing interests: None declared.

References

1. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Emergency medical technician paramedic: national standard curriculum (EMT‐P). http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/people/injury/ems/EMT‐P (Accessed 9 March 2007).
2. Wang H E, Yealy D M. Out‐of‐hospital endotracheal intubation: where are we? Ann Emerg Med 2006. 47532–541.541 [PubMed]
3. De Oliveira Filho G R. The construction of learning curves for basic skills in anesthetic procedures: an application for the cumulative sum method. Anesth Analg 2002. 95411–416.416 [PubMed]
4. Konrad C, Schupfer G, Wietlisbach M. et al Learning manual skills in anaesthesiology: is there a recommended number of cases for anesthetic procedures? Anesth Analg 1998. 86635–639.639 [PubMed]
5. Mulcaster J T, Mills J, Hung O R. et al Laryngoscopic intubation learning and performance, Anesthesiology 2003. 9823–27.27 [PubMed]
6. Tiah L, Wong E, Chen M F. et al Should there be a change in the teaching of airway management in the medical school curriculum? Resuscitation 2005. 6487–91.91 [PubMed]
7. Sagarin M J, Barton E D, Chng Y M. et al National Emergency Airway Registry Investigators. Airway management by US and Canadian emergency medicine residents: a multicenter analysis of more than 6,000 endotracheal intubation attempts, Ann Emerg Med 2005. 46328–336.336 [PubMed]
8. Bair A E, Filbin M R, Kulkarni R G. et al The failed intubation attempt in the emergency department: analysis of prevalence, rescue techniques, and personnel. J Emerg Med 2002. 23131–140.140 [PubMed]
9. Cormack R S, Lehane J. Difficult intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia 1984. 391105–1111.1111 [PubMed]
10. Murphy M F, Walls R M. Ch.5. The difficult and failed airway. In: Walls RM, ed, Manual of emergency airway management. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins 2000. 31–39.39
11. Yentis S M, Lee D J H. Evaluation of an improved scoring system for the grading of direct laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia 1998. 531041–1044.1044 [PubMed]
12. Cattano D, Panicucci E, Paolicchi A. et al Risk factors assessment of the difficult airway: an italian survey of 1956 patients. Anesth Analg 2004. 991774–1779.1779 [PubMed]

Articles from Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group