The gammaretroviruses represent a group of mammalian oncogenic retroviruses typically associated with the long-latency induction of leukemia and lymphoma in the natural host. Moloney murine leukemia virus (M-MuLV), a prototype laboratory gammaretrovirus, induces a T-lymphoblastic lymphoma of the thymus in virtually 100% of susceptible neonatal mice with a latency of 3 to 4 months (
Fan, 1997). Feline leukemia virus (FeLV) is a naturally occurring gammaretrovirus endemic in an outbreeding mammalian species, the domestic cat. Unlike M-MuLV, FeLV infection in the natural host is associated with a variable and rather unpredictable disease outcome. Natural FeLV infections in the domestic cat are associated with malignant and proliferative diseases including lymphomas and leukemias of lymphoid, myeloid or erythroid origin as well as degenerative diseases including anemia (
Rezanka et al., 1992). Analysis of FeLV-mediated disease induction offers a rare opportunity to study mechanisms of pathogenesis in an outbred mammalian host during infection with a natural pathogen.
FeLV occurs in nature not as a single genomic species but as a genetically complex family of closely related viruses. Genetic variation in FeLV is generated during virus replication through error-prone reverse transcription and by recombination with endogenous FeLV-related sequences. The consequence of this variation is a genetically diverse virus population that is continuously shaped by selective pressures
in vivo and from which variants arise as predominant species (
Overbaugh and Bangham, 2001). Our research objective over many years has been to examine the selective pressures operative in natural FeLV infection that lead to the predominance of viral variants, many of which have significant consequences for infection and disease progression. Natural isolates of FeLV most commonly exhibit sequence variation within the viral long terminal repeat (LTR) or the surface glycoprotein (SU) gene (
Neil et al., 1991;
Overbaugh and Bangham, 2001). The LTR of FeLV, like that of other retroviruses, is a modular structure in which the U3 region contains the transcriptional promoter and enhancer elements required to direct gene expression. The LTR encodes the major determinant of tumorigenic potential and disease specificity of the gammaretroviruses, particularly within the repeat elements characteristic of the central enhancer motif (
Fan, 1997;
Chandhasin et al., 2004). The LTR of M-MuLV or FeLV, like other gammaretroviruses, is implicated in the malignant process in two ways: (1) by directing high levels of virus expression in relevant target tissues, and (2) by insertionally activating oncogenes at or near the sites of proviral integration. Indeed, the FeLV LTR is a region of remarkable genetic variation among natural isolates, and LTR variants have been linked to particular disease outcome. For example, FeLV proviruses cloned directly from T-cell lymphomas typically contain two or three tandemly repeated enhancers in the LTR (
Fulton et al., 1990;
Matsumoto et al., 1992). In contrast, FeLV LTRs derived from nonneoplastic diseases or from non-T-cell malignancies typically contain only a single copy of the enhancer (
Jackson et al., 1996) but may contain repeated elements elsewhere in the LTR (
Athas et al., 1995;
Nishigaki et al., 2002;
Nagashima et al., 2005).
The FeLV surface glycoprotein gene (SU) represents another source of genetic variation among natural isolates. It has been shown that subtle mutational changes accumulate in FeLV SU during infection
in vivo, and may alter biological properties of the virus such as receptor utilization or affinity, replication kinetics or pathogenic potential (
Neil et al., 1991;
Brojatsch et al., 1992;
Kristal et al., 1993;
Rohn et al., 1998;
Gwynn et al., 2000;
Lauring et al., 2001;
Overbaugh and Bangham, 2001). As is typical of gammaretroviruses, the FeLV SU protein comprises an aminoterminal receptor-binding domain (RBD) followed by a proline-rich region (PRR) that mediates conformational changes required for entry. Two variable regions within RBD, designated VRA and VRB, define the specificity for receptor binding (
Battini et al., 1995;
Boomer et al., 1997;
Tailor and Kabat, 1997;
Sugai et al., 2001). FeLV occurs in nature in four subgroups, designated A, B, C and T, that are distinguished genetically by sequence differences in SU and functionally by interaction with distinct host cell receptors for entry. FeLV-A is a weakly pathogenic, ecotropic virus thought to represent the predominant agent spread horizontally cat-to-cat in nature. The known isolates of FeLV-A share ~97% amino acid sequence identity in SU, particularly remarkable since they were isolated over more than a decade from distant geographic locations across the world (
Donahue et al., 1988;
Neil et al., 1991;
Overbaugh and Bangham, 2001). FeLV-B, -C and -T subgroups are thought to arise from FeLV-A
de novo through point mutation, insertion and/or recombination with endogenous FeLV-related sequences during virus replication in the infected animal. While FeLV-A infection is typically associated with the induction of thymic lymphoma of T-cell origin (
Neil et al., 1991;
Rezanka et al., 1992), the FeLV-B, -C and –T subgroups are specifically associated with lymphoma, anemia or immunodeficiency disease, respectively (
Donahue et al., 1991;
Neil et al., 1991;
Rohn et al., 1998).
We previously described a natural isolate of FeLV, termed
FeLV-945, as the predominant species in a geographic and temporal cohort of naturally infected cats (
Athas et al., 1995;
Athas et al., 1995;
Chandhasin et al., 2004). The U3 region of the FeLV-945 LTR was shown to contain a unique repeat sequence motif, specifically, a single copy of the canonical transcriptional enhancer followed 25-bp downstream by the tandem triplication of a 21-bp repeat element. It was striking that the sequence and position of the 21-bp triplication within the LTR was precisely conserved among independent isolates from the cohort (
Prabhu et. al., 1999;
Chandhasin et al., 2004). The SU protein of FeLV-945 was shown to be most closely related to natural horizontally-transmissible FeLV-A, but was observed to differ from an FeLV-A prototype to a greater extent than the known FeLV-A isolates differ among themselves (
Athas et al., 1995;
Prabhu et al., 1999). The following review describes studies designed to understand the selective advantages that may have led to the predominance of FeLV-945 in a naturally infected population, and the consequences of its predominance on infection and disease progression.