PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of brjcancerBJC HomepageBJC Advance online publicationBJC Current IssueSubmitting an article to BJCWeb feeds
 
Br J Cancer. 2004 February 23; 90(4): 917–925.
Published online 2004 February 17. doi:  10.1038/sj.bjc.6601581
PMCID: PMC2410169

N-hexanoyl-sphingomyelin potentiates in vitro doxorubicin cytotoxicity by enhancing its cellular influx

Insufficient delivery of chemotherapeutic agents to their intended molecular targets remains a major obstacle in clinical oncology. Most anticancer drugs act intracellularly, which involves a transport step over the plasma membrane. The maximally reached intracellular drug concentration largely determines the efficacy of these compounds (Speth et al, 1988). Optimisation of influx, across the plasma membrane barrier of target cells, would therefore increase the therapeutic efficacy of a drug. Hydrophilic compounds are presumed to traverse the plasma membrane by relatively slow processes, such as carrier-mediated transport or endocytic uptake. More efficient in this respect are lipophilic drugs, which readily cross the lipid bilayer by passive diffusion, along their concentration gradient (Robert and Gianni, 1993; Washington et al, 2001). However, given the fact that anticancer drugs are generally applied systemically, maintenance of plasma solubility is an additional specification for these compounds. Vacillating between these opposite requirements, antineoplastic agents often exhibit an amphiphilic nature. Optimisation of cellular drug uptake is traditionally sought for by modification of lipophilicity. However, this often compromises interactions with its molecular target (Weiss, 1992).

The amphiphilic anthracycline doxorubicin is probably the best-studied example in drug–membrane interactions. Adsorption, insertion and flip-flop can be distinguished as consecutive stages in the transport of this compound across membranes (Regev and Eytan, 1997; Lecompte et al, 2002). Studies performed with model systems, such as large unilamellar vesicles, E. coli mutants and erythrocytes, revealed that membrane potential, pH and electrostatic forces play important roles in this (Terasaki et al, 1984; Nishiyama et al, 1992; de Wolf et al, 1993; Speelmans et al, 1997). Furthermore, hydrophobic interactions, membrane fluidity and drug lipophilicity are decisive for efficient drug import (Jedrzejczak et al, 1999; Schuldes et al, 2001). In line with these observations, it is of interest that the lipid composition of model membranes determines the efficiency of anthracycline translocation, and it is well conceivable that this also holds for natural membranes (Speelmans et al, 1994; Lecompte et al, 2002).

Plasma membrane lipid bilayers are composed of dozens of different lipid species, whose distribution is far from homogeneous due to the presence of microdomains such as lipid rafts and caveolae (Sprong et al, 2001; Simons and Ehehalt, 2002). The main principle underlying microdomain formation is the auto-organising capacity of sphingolipids, such as sphingomyelin (SM) and glycosphingolipids, both with themselves and in association with cholesterol. Owing to their relative insolubility in nonionic detergents, such as Triton X-100, these structures have been biochemically (operationally) defined as the detergent-resistant membrane fraction (DRM). The number of different types of (micro)domains are unknown, but presumably the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane should be considered as a mosaic-like patchwork with a differentiated lipid distribution (Gruenberg, 2001). This model implies local differences in lipophilicity and membrane fluidity, which in turn might determine the site and efficiency of cellular drug entry.

Several tools are available for manipulation of the plasma membrane lipid composition and distribution. Inhibitors of endogenous lipid-metabolising enzymes and cholesterol-sequestering agents are generally used (Radin et al, 1993; Ohvo and Slotte, 1996). Furthermore, (bacterial) lipid-metabolising enzymes can be administered to cultured cells (Veldman et al, 1998). In addition to these indirect approaches, lipids might also be added directly to cells. Natural double-chain lipids, however, due to their bulky hydrophobic nature, are poorly soluble and do not insert spontaneously into cellular membranes. These natural (phospho)lipids, containing fatty acids composed of 16–24 carbon atoms, are useful in liposomal drug delivery systems, but not as single molecules. The use of truncated analogues, on the other hand, improves both solubility and membrane permeability of the lipids. Typically, such analogues contain one or two truncated chains, consisting of only 2 (acetyl; C2), 6 (hexanoyl; C6) or 8 (octanoyl; C8) carbon atoms, and easily insert as monomers in a lipid bilayer. Being structurally closely related to their natural counterparts, these semisynthetic analogues appear to be transported and metabolised normally (Watanabe et al, 1999). Some lipid analogues elicit strong cellular responses. C6-ceramide, for example, rapidly induces apoptosis in a number of cell types (Veldman et al, 1998). Others, such as C6-SM, appear to be rather inert in this respect.

With the present in vitro work, we investigated whether plasma membrane lipid manipulation is a feasible strategy for increasing the cellular entry of doxorubicin and other amphiphilic drugs. Of all tested methods, treatment of cells with C6-SM exhibited the most prominent effect on cellular doxorubicin uptake and cytotoxicity. Since the lipid itself was nontoxic at its effective concentrations (low micromolar), C6-SM should be considered as a novel potentiator of doxorubicin cytotoxicity. While natural long-chain SM is a common constituent of liposomal drug formulations, in which it serves a mere structural role (Betz et al, 2001), the short-chain SM analogue acts directly in the drug uptake process itself. Herewith, we provide the first example of a synthetic lipid that acts as a delivery enhancer of a pharmacon. As such, this finding holds promise for in vivo applications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Materials

Bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein kit, 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT), C6-ceramide (C6-Cer), C8-ceramide-1-phosphate (C8-Cer-1P), sphingosylphosphorylcholine, dihexanoyl-phosphatidylcholine, methyl-β-cyclodextrin (CDX), S. aureus sphingomyelinase (bSMase), polyoxyethylene 20 oleyl ether (Brij 98), sulphorhodamine 101, propidium iodide, o-phtaldialdehyde, bisbenzimidine, camptothecin and daunorubicin were purchased from Sigma (St Louis, MO, USA). N-acetyl-sphingomyelin (C2-SM), N-hexanoyl-sphingomyelin (C6-SM) and DL-threo-1-phenyl-2-decanoylamino-3-morpholino-1-propanol (PPMP) were from Matreya (State College, PA, USA). AlexaFluor 488 (AF488) conjugates of hydrazide, cholera toxin β subunit (CTB) and transferrin were from Molecular Probes (Leiden, The Netherlands). Vectashield mounting medium was from Vector Laboratories (Burlingame CA, USA) and the CytoTox 96 lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity assay kit was from Promega (Madison WI, USA). LK6D silica TLC plates were from Whatman (Maidstone, UK). Doxorubicin was obtained from Pharmachemie (Haarlem, The Netherlands), epirubicin from Pharmacia & Upjohn (Woerden, The Netherlands), idarubicin from Farmitalia (Milan, Italy) and topotecan from SmithKline Beecham (Conshohocken PA, USA). 1-Octanol was from Riedel-de Haën (Seelze, Germany).

Cell culture

The following cell types were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) containing 10% (v v−1) foetal calf serum: primary bovine aortic endothelial cells (BAEC; passage 14–19), kindly provided by Dr A Haimovitz-Friedman (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City NY, USA); MCF-7, KB and A431 carcinoma cells, purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas VA, USA); SV40 large-T antigen-immortalised kidney fibroblasts from Mrp1/Mdr1a/Mdr1b triple knockout mice and control renal fibroblasts (Wijnholds et al, 2000; kindly provided by Dr AH Schinkel, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam). Cells were subcultured weekly by trypsinisation and maintained in a water-saturated atmosphere of 10% (BAEC) or 5% (MCF-7, KB, A431 and fibroblasts) CO2 at 37°C. All culture media were supplemented with 100 U ml−1 penicillin, 100 μg ml−1 streptomycin and 4 mM L-glutamine.

Microscopy

For microscopic studies, BAEC were cultured to confluence on 0.5%. (w v−1) gelatin-coated glass coverslips. Under serum-free conditions, cells were then exposed to 50 μM doxorubicin for the indicated periods of time. After washing, cells were fixed in 4% (w v−1) paraformaldehyde in PBS for 10 min and mounted in Vectashield on glass slides. Cells were then examined with a Zeiss Axiovert S100 inverted fluorescence microscope, employing a mercury lamp in combination with a filter set consisting of a 450–490 nm band pass excitation filter, a 510 nm beam splitter and a 520 nm long-pass emission filter. All specimens were photographed through a × 20 objective by a Zeiss AxioCam CCD camera using an exposure time of 200 ms.

Cellular drug accumulation

For intracellular doxorubicin measurements, cells were cultured in flat-bottom 96-well plates. At confluence, cells were changed to a serum-free medium and exposed to 50 μM doxorubicin during 60 min (unless indicated otherwise). After washing with ice-cold PBS, cells were lysed in 1% (w v−1) Triton X-100 in water. Native fluorescence intensities were then measured by a Perkin-Elmer Victor Wallac II fluorescence microplate reader, using λex 485 nm and λem 535 nm filters. Additional probes and drugs that were tested for cellular uptake during 60 min incubations, either in the absence or presence of lipid, were hydrazide-AF488 (35 μM, λex 485 nm, λem 535 nm), sulphorodamine-101 (400 μM, λex 355 nm, λem 620 nm), propidium iodide (300 μM, λex 355 nm, λem 535 nm), o-phtaldialdehyde (1 mM, λex 485 nm, λem 535 nm), topotecan (30 μM, λex 355 nm, λem 535 nm), epirubicin (50 μM, λex 485 nm, λem 535 nm), bisbenzimidine (10 μM, λex 355 nm, λem 460 nm), camptothecin (30 μM, λex 355 nm, λem 460 nm), daunorubicin (25 μM, λex 485 nm, λem 535 nm) and idarubicin (20 μM, λex 485 nm, λem 535 nm). All values were corrected for background fluorescence (or radioactivity) and for differences in protein content, as determined with the BCA assay (Smith et al, 1985).

Cell viability

For viability assessment, cells were cultured in flat-bottom 96-well plates. After experimental treatments, 100 μg of the mitochondrial dehydrogenase substrate MTT was added to each well (Carmichael et al, 1987). Cells were then incubated for 60 min at 37°C. After centrifugation (3000 rpm, 10 min) supernatants were removed. The precipitated blue formazan products were then dissolved in 100 μl DMSO and absorbencies were read in a Bio-Tek Instruments EL 340 photospectrometric microplate reader at 540 nm. Background absorbencies were subtracted and values from untreated control cells were set at 100% viability.

Plasma membrane integrity assessment

Confluent and serum-free BAEC were incubated for 120 min in the presence of C6-SM and 175 μM of the membrane impermeant fluid phase marker hydrazide-AF488. After washing, cells were lysed in PBS containing 1% (w v−1) Triton X-100 and fluorescence was measured at λex 485 nm and λem 535 nm. Alternatively, the release of the cytosolic enzyme LDH from confluent BAEC into phenol red-free DMEM was measured. For this, plates were centrifuged (5 min, 2000 rpm) and 50 μl aliquots of the supernatants were assessed for LDH activity by using the CytoTox 96 kit, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Values obtained from cells lysed in 0.8% Triton X-100 served as positive control. All data were corrected for protein contents, as determined with the BCA assay (Smith et al, 1985).

Endocytosis assays

To monitor clathrin- and raft-mediated endocytic activity, confluent BAEC were allowed to take up AF488-transferrin (150 μg ml−1) or AF488-CTB (75 μg ml−1), respectively. Incubations were performed under serum-free conditions in the presence of 10 μM C6-SM during 120 min. Cells were then washed and lysed in PBS containing 1% (v v−1) Triton X-100. Fluorescence was then measured at λex 485 nm and λem 535 nm. Values were corrected for protein content, as determined with the BCA assay (Smith et al, 1985).

Isolation of detergent-resistant membrane fraction

For each isolation, four confluent [empty] 15 cm dishes with confluent BAEC were treated as indicated. Cells were then washed twice with ice-cold PBS and harvested by scraping and centrifugation (3000 rpm, 5 min, 4°C). Pellets were resuspended in 1 ml of ice-cold 0.5% (w v−1) Triton X-100 in MES-buffered saline (MBS; 25 mM 2-[N-morpholino]ethanesulphonic acid in 150 mM NaCl, pH 6.5) (Lisanti et al, 1995). After 30 min on ice, 1.2 ml of MBS was added and 2 ml of this suspension was mixed with 2 ml 80% sucrose (w v−1) in MBS and transferred to Beckman Ultraclear 14 × 89 mm tubes. This layer was overlaid with cushions of 5 ml 30% (w v−1) and 3 ml 5% (w v−1) sucrose in MBS, respectively. Remnants of the initial suspension were used for the determination of total protein, drug and lipid contents (designated as total). Gradients were subjected to ultracentrifugation in an SW41 swing-out rotor (39 000 rpm, 16 h, 4°C). After each run, opaque bands of insoluble material were visible in the upper half of each gradient. Tubes were aspirated in 1 ml fractions, of which the upper six (designated as DRM) and the lower six were pooled (designated as non-DRM). Alternatively, the whole procedure was carried out at room temperature using 1% (w v−1) Brij 98 as detergent (Pike et al, 2002).

Sphingomyelin quantification

Total lipids were extracted from the sucrose gradient fractions and dried under a stream of N2 (Bligh and Dyer, 1959). Glycerol-containing phospholipids were hydrolysed during an overnight incubation at 37°C in 0.2 M NaOH in methanol/chloroform (1 : 1, by vol.). The remaining lipids were then re-extracted, dried and applied onto TLC plates, which were developed at room temperature using chloroform/methanol/water (60 : 30 : 8, by vol.) as the mobile phase. Lipids were visualised by iodine vapour staining and natural SM and C6-SM containing spots were identified with the aid of external standards, run on the same plate. Confirmation of this identification took place by bSMase pretreatment (0.1 U ml−1, 2 h, 20°C) of C6-SM-loaded cells before the extraction. Both SM and C6-SM spots were scraped from the plate and subjected to a colorimetric phosphate determination, using inorganic phosphate as standard (Böttcher et al, 1961).

Determination of lipophilicity

Partitioning of 10–50 μM drug or probe was monitored in a two-phase system consisting of 1 ml 1-octanol and 1 ml water. After addition of the compound, tubes were vortexed and centrifuged (3000 rpm, 5 min, 20°C). Aliquots of both the organic and the aqueous phases were taken for fluorimetric quantification, as described under Cellular drug accumulation. As a measure of lipophilicity, the 1-octanol/water partitioning ratio was calculated for each compound and expressed on a log scale (Washington et al, 2001).

RESULTS

Cellular doxorubicin uptake and toxicity is specifically enhanced by C6-SM

To study the cellular uptake of doxorubicin in vitro, BAEC were exposed to 50 μM of the drug, and intracellular accumulation was then monitored, either by fluorescence microscopy or by fluorimetry of cell lysates. Under control conditions, intracellular doxorubicin accumulation proceeded in a time-dependent manner, starting within minutes upon addition (Figure 1a–e and Figure 2). This kinetic altered significantly when cells were cotreated with 10 μM of C6-SM (Figure 1f–j and Figure 2). Under these conditions, intracellular doxorubicin was observed within the first minute and increased up to 300% over control levels for incubation periods of 15–60 min (Figure 2, inset). This relative increase gradually diminished when doxorubicin uptake was monitored for longer periods.

Figure 1
C6-SM enhances the cellular uptake and nuclear accumulation of doxorubicin. Confluent BAEC were incubated for the indicated periods with 50 μM of doxorubicin, either in the absence (A–E) or presence (F-J) of 10 μ ...
Figure 2
Uptake-enhancing effect of C6-SM on doxorubicin is most evident within the first hour. Confluent BAEC were incubated for the indicated periods with 50 μM of doxorubicin, either in the absence (○) or presence (•) of 10 ...

The observed doxorubicin uptake-enhancing effect of C6-SM in BAEC was clearly concentration-dependent (Figure 3a). A significant increase in drug uptake was seen at lipid concentrations as low as 2 μM. However, a maximum increase of 300% over control values was reached at 6 μM of C6-SM. No further increases were observed at higher concentrations. Comparable results were obtained in a panel of human doxorubicin-sensitive tumour cell lines: MCF-7 (mammary adenocarcinoma), KB (oesophagal carcinoma) and A431 (epidermoid carcinoma) cells (Figures 3b–d).

Figure 3
Concentration-dependency of the C6-SM effect on doxorubicin accumulation. BAEC (A), MCF-7 (B), KB (C) and A431 (D) cells were incubated with the indicated concentrations of C6-SM and 50 μM doxorubicin for 60 min. After washing, ...

To test whether increased intracellular concentrations of doxorubicin correlated with increased cytotoxicity, we allowed BAEC and tumour cell lines to accumulate doxorubicin for 60 min in the presence of varying concentrations of C6-SM. After washing away remaining extracellular drug and lipid, cells were cultured for another 48 h. Viability was then assessed by the MTT assay, which relies on the fact that only mitochondria of viable cells have the capacity to convert the MTT substrate (Carmichael et al, 1987). A concentration series of doxorubicin resulted in typical sigmoid survival curves for BAEC and A431 cells (Figures 4a and b). Curves of cells that accumulated doxorubicin in the presence of C6-SM shifted leftward, indicating increased cell death. The doxorubicin EC50 value for BAEC toxicity shifted from 4 μM in the absence of C6-SM to 0.6 μM for cells treated with 10 μM of C6-SM, indicating a seven-fold increase in sensitivity. In A431 cells, C6-SM shifted back doxorubicin EC50 values from 1.8 to 0.13 μM, thus yielding a 14-fold increase in drug sensitivity. When plotted against the C6-SM concentration, it is evident that essentially no further decreases in doxorubicin EC50 occurred above 6 μM of lipid (insets of Figures 4a and b), and that low micromolar concentrations were relatively most beneficial in this respect. Similar results were obtained with MCF-7 and KB cells (not shown). C6-SM itself was virtually nontoxic at the presently used concentrations and incubation periods (not shown).

Figure 4
C6-SM potentiates the cytotoxic effect of doxorubicin at low micromolar concentrations. BAEC (A) and A431 (B) cells were incubated with various concentrations of doxorubicin, combined with 0 μM (•), 2 μM (○), ...

To examine which molecular features of C6-SM are critical for its doxorubicin uptake-enhancing properties, we tested a series of closely related (synthetic) lipid analogues (Table 1 ), in an assay similar as employed for C6-SM. We established that short-chain sphingolipid analogues without a choline or phosphocholine head group moiety (C8-ceramide-1-phosphate and C6-ceramide, respectively) had little or no effect. Sphingosylphosphorylcholine (C0-SM) and C2-SM exhibited a moderate effect, whereas short-chain phosphatidylcholine, a glycerol-containing lipid, was completely without effect. Thus, the observed effect on drug uptake is optimal for phosphocholine-containing truncated sphingolipid analogues, but the N-acyl truncation should not be too rigorous and probably not too small either, since supplementation of natural long-chain SM does not work.

Table 1
Doxorubicin uptake-enhancing effect is an exclusive property of truncated, phosphocholine-containing sphingolipids

C6-SM does not act by inducing membrane leakage, endocytosis or efflux inhibition

Plasma membrane integrity was monitored by measuring the uptake of the fluid phase marker hydrazide-AF488 by BAEC. No additional inward flux of this membrane-impermeant marker was observed in the presence of 10 μM C6-SM (97.4±18.2% uptake, as compared to 100% control uptake). Conversely, no C6-SM-induced release of the cytosolic enzyme LDH was observed (19.0±3.9% of total LDH activity released into the culture medium within an hour under control conditions, and 19.7±3.5% in the presence of 10 μM C6-SM). These data are consistent with each other, indicating that C6-SM leaves the plasma membrane physically intact.

We investigated whether C6-SM stimulates the endocytic machinery in our system by using fluorescent conjugates of transferrin and the CTB subunit, as markers for clathrin- and raft-mediated endocytosis, respectively (Mellman, 1996; Orlandi and Fishman 1998). No increased uptake of fluorescence by BAEC in the presence of the lipid was observed. Instead, a small decrease was detectable (67±36% of transferrin and 80±23% of CTB uptake, as compared to 100% uptake under control conditions). Moreover, when cells were maintained at 4°C or were depleted for ATP (with sodium azide and deoxyglucose; Schwoebel et al, 2002), conditions that block endocytosis, the C6-SM-stimulated doxorubicin uptake remained unaffected. Thus, we conclude that the C6-SM effect is unrelated to endocytosis.

Although the presently used cells express only modest levels of drug transporter proteins, such as MDR1 and MRP1, we tested for the possible involvement of these proteins in the observed C6-SM effect on doxorubicin uptake. Three different experimental approaches were employed (Table 2 ). (1) Since ABC-transporters are energy-dependent, we used a regimen of sodium azide and deoxyglucose that eventually depletes cells from ATP (Schwoebel et al, 2002). Under these conditions, and in the absence of C6-SM, no accumulation of doxorubicin in BAEC was detected above control levels. In addition, no significant increase in the C6-SM effect was observed. (2) PSC833 and MK571 are inhibitors of MDR1 and MRP1, respectively (Mayer et al, 1997; Kok et al, 2000). At their effective concentrations, no additional accumulation of doxorubicin was observed in the absence of C6-SM, and no further increase was observed in the presence of C6-SM, not even in combination with ATP depletion (not shown). (3) Like in normal fibroblasts, the doxorubicin uptake-enhancing effect of C6-SM was observed in fibroblasts that we derived from Mrp1/Mdr1a/Mdr1b triple knockout mice (a three- to four-fold increase, as compared to doxorubicin uptake in the absence of the lipid analogue) (Wijnholds et al, 2000). Collectively, the data obtained from these metabolic, pharmacological and genetic approaches (Table 2) allow us to conclude that the C6-SM effect on doxorubicin accumulation is unrelated to ABC-transporter proteins.

Table 2
ABC-transporter proteins are not involved in C6-SM-enhanced doxorubicin uptake

C6-SM inserts into the plasma membrane but its effect is independent of lipid rafts

Within 60 min, only an estimated 1.5% of the total added amount of C6-SM (at 10 μM) was taken up by BAEC, reflecting the relative water-solubility of the truncated lipid. When compared to the cellular pool of endogenous SM (13.15±3.96 nmol mg−1 of protein), this fraction of inserted C6-SM was nevertheless substantial (1.81±0.47 nmol mg protein−1). This cell-associated C6-SM was fully responsible for the enhanced doxorubicin uptake, since the effect remained after washing away C6-SM that had not been taken up by the cells. The drug uptake-enhancing effect was strongly diminished when membrane-inserted C6-SM was hydrolysed by exogenously applied bSMase, or by extraction by a BSA back-exchange procedure (not shown). Since bSMase and BSA act from outside at the cell surface and have no access to the cell interior, these results indicate that C6-SM exerts its effect in the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane lipid bilayer.

Given the fact that natural long-chain SM is highly enriched in lipid rafts, we questioned whether C6-SM would likewise accumulate into these lipid microdomains. To answer this question, we employed an established isolation procedure, based on the insolubility of these membrane microdomains in ice-cold Triton X-100, combined with ultracentrifugation on a discontinuous sucrose gradient (Lisanti et al, 1995). As expected, natural SM was highly enriched in this DRM fraction (Table 3 ). C6-SM, on the other hand, was predominantly present in the non-DRM. The distribution of endogenous SM in control cells was identical to that of C6-SM-treated cells, indicating that no jostling of natural SM occurred by its truncated counterpart. To exclude the possibility that low temperatures and the use of a detergent like Triton X-100 induced artefactual changes in the distribution of (short-chain) lipids, we repeated the experiment with Brij 98, allowing raft isolation at room temperature (Pike et al, 2002). However, the distribution of both natural and short-chain SM over the DRM vs non-DRM fractions was identical to those of the Triton X-100 isolation (not shown).

Table 3
No preferential insertion of C6-SM into lipid rafts

We investigated whether the doxorubicin uptake-enhancing effect of the lipid might nevertheless be functionally dependent on lipid rafts. We therefore, in BAEC, strongly reduced the levels of cholesterol, SM and glycosphingolipids, the major lipid constituents of rafts, by employing CDX, bSMase and PPMP, respectively (Radin et al, 1993; Ohvo and Slotte, 1996; Veldman et al, 1998). Although each of these compounds exhibits a strong impact on the integrity and function of lipid rafts, none of these induced effects on doxorubicin uptake itself, nor on the C6-SM-enhancing effect on this (Table 4 ).

Table 4
C6-SM effect on doxorubicin uptake by BAEC is independent of natural sphingomyelin and other lipid raft components

C6-SM acts optimally on amphiphilic compounds

In addition to doxorubicin, we tested an array of fluorescent chemotherapeutic drugs and intracellular probes for their sensitivity towards C6-SM-uptake enhancement. In addition, we determined the lipophilicity of each of these compounds by establishing their partitioning ratio (P) over a defined 1-octanol/water system (Washington et al, 2001). When these parameters were plotted against each other (Figure 5), a clear optimum was observed in the P range of 1–6 (amphiphilic to slightly lipophilic). In addition to doxorubicin, other amphiphilic drugs such as epirubicin and topotecan were identified as being C6-SM sensitive as well. In contrast, both water-soluble compounds and very lipophilic drugs such as camptothecin, daunorubicin and idarubicin were mostly insensitive to C6-SM.

Figure 5
C6-SM uptake enhancement is optimal for amphiphilic compounds. During a 60 min period, confluent BAEC were allowed to take up one of a series of fluorescent compounds, either in the absence (control) or presence of 10 μM C6-SM. ...

DISCUSSION

We discovered here that the short-chain sphingolipid analogue C6-SM facilitates the cellular influx of amphiphilic drugs in vitro, in turn leading to an enhanced cytotoxicity. This effect was most pronounced for doxorubicin. This anthracycline showed optimal lipophilicity, which turned out to be a decisive factor in the C6-SM-facilitated uptake. The lipophilicity of chemically related anthracyclines daunorubicin and idarubicin is significantly higher, which correlated with less effect. The drug uptake-enhancing effect turned out to be highly specific for C6-SM, since even minor modifications in this sphingolipid structure largely diminished the effect on drug uptake. At its active concentrations (2–6 μM), C6-SM itself was virtually nontoxic to cells. Therefore, this lipid can be considered as a novel potentiator of doxorubicin cytotoxicity.

The precise mechanism by which C6-SM enhances drug uptake remains unestablished, but we ruled out the following five possibilities: (1) C6-SM did not induce nonspecific membrane damage, for example by exhibiting detergent-like effects. By (local) dissolving of the plasma membrane, this would have resulted in an increased drug influx. However, at the concentrations used in this study, C6-SM did not increase the membrane permeability of a hydrophilic marker molecule (AF488-hydrazide) or a cytosolic protein (LDH), indicating that plasma membrane integrity was indeed maintained. (2) The enhanced doxorubicin uptake by C6-SM was not due to an increase in endocytic activity. Although doxorubicin is known to traverse the plasma membrane barrier by passive diffusion along its concentration gradient, it is conceivable that some internalisation may also occur along with (constitutive) endocytosis, and that C6-SM might stimulate this route. In S. cerevisiae, for example, certain sphingolipids are involved in endocytotic signalling processes (Friant et al, 2001). However, C6-SM did not stimulate the cellular uptake of transferrin and CTB, markers for, respectively, clathrin-dependent and clathrin-independent endocytic routes. In addition, C6-SM-enhanced doxorubicin uptake also occurred at low temperatures and was ATP-independent. Together, these results exclude any involvement of endocytic processes. (3) The effect of C6-SM did not result from an interaction with members of the ATP-binding cassette super family of transporter proteins (ABC transporter proteins), which are able to mediate the efflux of anthracyclines like doxorubicin against a concentration gradient (Borst and Oude Elferink 2002). Some ABC transporter proteins, such as MDR1 and MRP1, have the capacity to translocate lipids (Smit et al, 1993; van Helvoort et al, 1996; Schmitz et al, 2000). Since intracellular drug concentrations are determined by a balance between drug influx and efflux, C6-SM might have indirectly caused a doxorubicin accumulation by inhibition of the cellular efflux capacity. However, neither metabolic, nor pharmacological, nor genetic intervention with the function of ABC transporter proteins affected the C6-SM-enhanced doxorubicin uptake. (4) No modification of doxorubicin by C6-SM occurs before membrane insertion. The uptake-enhancing effect was retained when the lipid and drug were presented to cells after each other, with extensive washing in between. This observation indicates that no complex formation between the two occurred prior to plasma membrane association. Therefore, no possible lipid-induced changes in the physicochemical properties of doxorubicin can explain its increased uptake efficiency. (5) Natural lipid rafts play no role in the C6-SM-enhanced drug uptake. While natural long-chain SM is highly enriched in lipid rafts (Veldman et al, 2001), its short-chain analogue, C6-SM, did not accumulate in these membrane microdomains (at least not in the DRM fraction). Furthermore, artificial disruption of these microdomains, by either cholesterol extraction, SM hydrolysis or glycosphingolipid depletion, had no effect on the doxorubicin uptake-enhancing effect of C6-SM.

Having excluded the above possibilities, what other clues do we have to explain the lipid-enhanced drug uptake? Firstly, the C6-SM effect is abrogated when the lipid is removed by BSA back-extraction (simple washing with buffer is ineffective) or hydrolysed by treatment with an exogenous bacterial SMase. Since BSA and bSMase have no direct access to the cell interior, these results indicate that C6-SM acts at the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane. Furthermore, only a small fraction (1.5%) of the supplied C6-SM is taken up by cells. This finding is consistent both with its relative hydrophilicity and with the observed plateau in doxorubicin-uptake enhancement and cytotoxicity, reached at about 8 μM of C6-SM (Figures 3 and and4).4). This possibly indicates a saturation of particular membrane insertion sites. Once in the membrane, C6-SM might not be randomly dispersed but, like natural long-chain sphingolipids, show a tendency to self-aggregate in the plane of the membrane (van Blitterswijk et al, 1987, 2003; Holopainen et al, 1998). It is therefore appealing to speculate that these physical properties allow C6-SM to form their own ‘artificial’ rafts, which, however, remain detergent soluble (as found here). In this way, and by virtue of its acyl truncation, it may be speculated that C6-SM induces local ‘voids’ in the lipid bilayer that could accommodate doxorubicin molecules. Owing to the resulting local changes in lipophilicity, thickness and fluidity, the plasma membrane permeability for amphiphilic drugs would then specifically be facilitated. Alternatively, self-aggregation of C6-SM might lead to artificial ‘channels’ in the membrane, providing a preferential gateway for drug uptake, similar as described, for example for ceramides (Siskind and Colombini, 2000; Siskind et al, 2002). Unfortunately, the possible formation of distinct C6-SM rafts or channels is difficult to prove experimentally at present. Natural lipid rafts can be isolated as a DRM fraction, but C6-SM is excluded from this fraction. Further investigation of this issue therefore awaits the development of more sophisticated (detergent-free) isolation procedures.

Since the present in vitro findings seem promising, it is of interest to speculate on possible in vivo applications. Of all drugs tested so far, doxorubicin turned out to be the most sensitive towards the uptake-enhancing properties of C6-SM. We used doxorubicin at a concentration of 50 μM, which corresponds well to common plasma concentrations in patients upon a single bolus administration of 40–60 mg m−2 body surface. The doxorubicin uptake-enhancing effect of C6-SM was particularly strong within 15–60 min of drug administration. Since the t1/2 clearance of systemically applied doxorubicin is approximately 1.25 h, this is a very relevant interval, which would allow target tissues to accumulate larger amounts of the drug (Robert and Gianni, 1993). Theoretically, significant lower doses of doxorubicin would thus be required to obtain a successful (clinical) outcome, when coadministered with the short-chain sphingolipid. However, to actually improve the therapeutic efficacy of doxorubicin by coadministration of C6-SM, some advantageous (tumour) tissue selectivity of the lipid is required. In this context, promising preliminary results were obtained with cultured rat cardiac myoblasts. For as yet unknown reasons, these cells are not susceptible towards the sphingolipid analogues (Veldman et al, unpublished observation). Given the fact that cardiotoxicity is an important limiting factor in anthracycline-based chemotherapy, this result is encouraging.

On the other hand, some open questions remain with respect to the usefulness of systemically applied short-chain SM. Namely, due to its affinity for serum components, such as albumin and lipoproteins, or due to association with nonrelevant cell membranes (e.g. erythrocytes), large amounts of the lipid might be needed to reach the required plasma concentrations. Potential hazards then include unwanted toxicity for vessel walls or other nontumour tissues/cells. Furthermore, the possibility exists that C6-SM and doxorubicin (or any other amphiphilic drug) differ in pharmacokinetics, biodistribution and metabolism, and may thus not be delivered at the same time at the same site, which is a prerequisite for the drug uptake-enhancing effect. Extensive pharmacological studies into the toxicity, efficacy, pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of C6-SM (in combination with amphiphilic drugs or not) are therefore required to assess the feasibility of clinical C6-SM-based drug delivery. Hopefully, our present in vitro data will encourage new experiments in this direction.

Acknowledgments

This work was financed by the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs (Senter).

References

  • Betz G, Imboden R, Imanidis G. Interaction of liposome formulations with human skin in vitro. Int J Pharm. 2001;229:117–129. [PubMed]
  • Bligh EJ, Dyer WJ. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol. 1959;37:911–917. [PubMed]
  • Borst P, Oude Elferink R. Mammalian ABC transporters in health and disease. Annu Rev Biochem. 2002;71:537–592. [PubMed]
  • Böttcher CJF, van Gent CM, Pries C. A rapid and sensitive submicro phosphorus determination. Anal Chim Acta. 1961;24:203–204.
  • Carmichael J, DeGraff WG, Gazdar AF, Minna JD, Mitchell JB. Evaluation of a tetrazolium-based semiautomated colorimetric assay: assessment of chemosensitivity testing. Cancer Res. 1987;47:936–942. [PubMed]
  • De Wolf FA, Staffhorst RW, Smits HP, Onwezen MF, de Kruijff B. Role of anionic phospholipids in the interaction of doxorubicin and plasma membrane vesicles: drug binding and structural consequences in bacterial systems. Biochemistry. 1993;32:6688–6695. [PubMed]
  • Friant S, Lombardi R, Schmelzle T, Hall MN, Riezman H. Sphingoid base signaling via Pkh kinases is required for endocytosis in yeast. EMBO J. 2001;20:6783–6792. [PubMed]
  • Gruenberg J. The endocytic pathway: a mosaic of domains. Nature Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001;2:721–730. [PubMed]
  • Holopainen JM, Subramanian M, Kinnunen PK. Sphingomyelinase induces lipid microdomain formation in a fluid phosphatidylcholine/sphingomyelin membrane. Biochemistry. 1998;37:17562–17570. [PubMed]
  • Jedrzejczak M, Koceva-Chyla A, Gwozdzinski K, Jozwiak Z. Changes in plasma membrane fluidity of immortal rodent cells induced by anticancer drugs doxorubicin, aclarubicin and mitoxantrone. Cell Biol Int. 1999;23:497–506. [PubMed]
  • Kok JW, Veldman RJ, Klappe K, Koning H, Filipeanu CM, Muller M. Differential expression of sphingolipids in MRP1 overexpressing HT29 cells. Int J Cancer. 2000;87:172–178. [PubMed]
  • Lecompte MF, Laurent G, Jaffrezou JP. Sphingomyelin content conditions insertion of daunorubicin within phosphatidylcholine monolayers. FEBS Lett. 2002;525:141–144. [PubMed]
  • Lisanti MP, Tang Z, Scherer PE, Sargiacomo M. Caveolae purification and glycophosphatidylinositol-linked protein sorting on polarised epithelia. Methods Enzymol. 1995;250:655–668. [PubMed]
  • Mayer U, Wagenaar E, Dorobek B, Beijnen JH, Borst P, Schinkel AH. Full blockade of intestinal P-glycoprotein and extensive inhibition of blood–brain barrier P-glycoprotein by oral treatment of mice with PSC833. J Clin Invest. 1997;100:2430–2436. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Mellman I. Endocytosis and molecular sorting. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1996;12:575–625. [PubMed]
  • Nishiyama M, Aogi K, Saeki S, Kim R, Kuroi K, Yamaguchi Y, Toge T. A role for plasma membrane potential in doxorubicin-induced cytotoxicity. Anticancer Res. 1992;12:849–852. [PubMed]
  • Ohvo H, Slotte JP. Cyclodextrin-mediated removal of sterols from monolayers: effects of sterol structure and phospholipids on desorption rate. Biochemistry. 1996;35:8018–8024. [PubMed]
  • Orlandi PA, Fishman PH. Filipin-dependent inhibition of cholera toxin: evidence for toxin internalization and activation through caveolae-like domains. J Cell Biol. 1998;141:905–915. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Pike LJ, Han X, Chung KN, Gross RW. Lipid rafts are enriched in arachidonic acid and plasmenylethanolamine and their composition is independent of caveolin-1 expression: a quantitative electrospray ionization/mass spectrometric analysis. Biochemistry. 2002;41:2075–2088. [PubMed]
  • Radin NS, Shayman JA, Inokuchi J. Metabolic effects of inhibiting glucosylceramide synthesis with PDMP and other substances. Adv Lipid Res. 1993;26:183–213. [PubMed]
  • Regev R, Eytan GD. Flip-flop of doxorubicin across erythrocyte and lipid membranes. Biochem Pharm. 1997;54:1151–1158. [PubMed]
  • Robert J, Gianni L. Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of anthracyclines Pharmacokinetics and Cancer Chemotherapy: Cancer Surveys 1993. CSHL press: Woodbury; 219–252.252In Workman P, Graham MA (eds)Vol 17 [PubMed]
  • Schmitz G, Kaminski WE, Orso E. ABC transporters in cellular lipid trafficking. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2000;11:493–501. [PubMed]
  • Schuldes H, Dolderer JH, Zimmer G, Knobloch J, Bickeboller R, Jonas D, Woodcock BG. Reversal of multidrug resistance and increase in plasma membrane fluidity in CHO cells with R-verapamil and bile salts. Eur J Cancer. 2001;37:660–667. [PubMed]
  • Schwoebel ED, Ho TH, Moore MS. The mechanism of inhibition of Ran-dependent nuclear transport by cellular ATP depletion. J Cell Biol. 2002;157:963–974. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Simons K, Ehehalt R. Cholesterol, lipid rafts, and disease. J Clin Invest. 2002;110:597–603. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Siskind LJ, Colombini M. The lipids C2- and C16-ceramide form large stable channels. Implications for apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:9868–9876. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Siskind LJ, Kolesnick RN, Colombini M. Ceramide channels increase the permeability of the mitochondrial outer membrane to small proteins. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:26796–26803. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Smit JJM, Schinkel AH, Oude-Elferink RPJ, Groen AK, Wagenaar E, van Deemter L, Mol C, Ottenhoff R, van der Lugt NMT, van Roon MA, van der Valk, Offerhaus GJA, Berns AJM, Borst P. Homozygotous disruption of the murine mdr2-P-glycoprotein gene leads to a complete absence of phospholipid from bile and to liver disease. Cell. 1993;75:451–462. [PubMed]
  • Smith PK, Krohn RI, Hermanson GT, Mallia AK, Gartner FH, Provenzano MD, Fujimotot EK, Goeke NM, Olson BJ, Klenk DC. Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid. Anal Chem. 1985;150:76–85. [PubMed]
  • Speelmans G, Staffhorst RW, de Kruijff B. The anionic phospholipid-mediated membrane interaction of the anti-cancer drug doxorubicin is enhanced by phosphatidylethanolamine compared to other zwitterionic phospholipids. Biochemistry. 1997;36:8657–8662. [PubMed]
  • Speelmans G, Staffhorst RW, de Kruijff B, de Wolf FA. Transport studies of doxorubicin in model membranes indicate a difference in passive diffusion across and binding at the outer and inner leaflets of the plasma membrane. Biochemistry. 1994;33:13761–13768. [PubMed]
  • Speth PA, Raijmakers RA, Boezeman JB, Linssen PC, de Witte TJ, Wessels HM, Haanen C. In vivo cellular adriamycin concentrations related to growth inhibition of normal and leukemic human bone marrow cells. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1988;24:667–674. [PubMed]
  • Sprong H, van der Sluijs P, van Meer G. How proteins move lipids and lipids move proteins. Nature Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001;2:505–513. [PubMed]
  • Terasaki T, Iga T, Sugiyama Y, Hanano M. Pharmacokinetic study on the mechanism of tissue distribution of doxorubicin: interorgan and interspecies variation of tissue-to-plasma partition coefficients in rats, rabbits, and guinea pigs. J Pharm Sci. 1984;73:1359–1363. [PubMed]
  • Van Blitterswijk WJ, van der Luit AH, Veldman RJ, Verheij M, Borst J. Ceramide: second messenger or modulator of membrane structure and dynamics. Biochem J. 2003;369:199–211. [PubMed]
  • Van Blitterswijk WJ, van der Meer BW, Hilkmann H. Quantitative contributions of cholesterol and the individual classes of phospholipids and their degree of fatty acyl (un)saturation to membrane fluidity measured by fluorescence polarization. Biochemistry. 1987;26:1746–1756. [PubMed]
  • Van Helvoort A, Smith AJ, Sprong H, Fritzsche I, Schinkel AH, Borst P, van Meer G. MDR1 P-glycoprotein is a lipid translocase of broad specificity, while MDR3 P-glycoprotein specifically translocates phosphatidylcholine. Cell. 1996;87:507–517. [PubMed]
  • Veldman RJ, Klappe K, Hoekstra D, Kok JW. Metabolism and apoptotic properties of elevated ceramide in HT29rev cells. Biochem J. 1998;331:563–569. [PubMed]
  • Veldman RJ, Maestre N, Aduib OM, Medin JA, Salvayre R, Levade T. A neutral sphingomyelinase resides in sphingolipid-enriched microdomains and is inhibited by the caveolin-scaffolding domain: potential implications in tumour necrosis factor signaling. Biochem J. 2001;355:859–868. [PubMed]
  • Washington N, Washington C, Wilson CG. Physiological Pharmaceutics: Barriers to Drug Absorption. London : Taylor and Francis; 2001. Cell membranes, epithelial barriers and drug absorption; pp. 1–18.
  • Watanabe R, Asakura K, Rodriguez M, Pagano RE. Internalization and sorting of plasma membrane sphingolipid analogues in differentiating oligodendrocytes. J Neurochem. 1999;73:1375–1383. [PubMed]
  • Weiss RB. The anthracyclines: will we ever find a better doxorubicin. Sem Oncol. 1992;19:670–686. [PubMed]
  • Wijnholds J, deLange EC, Scheffer GL, van den Berg DJ, Mol CA, van der Valk M, Schinkel AH, Scheper RJ, Breimer DD, Borst P. Multidrug resistance protein 1 protects the choroid plexus epithelium and contributes to the blood–cerebrospinal fluid barrier. J Clin Invest. 2000;105:279–285. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK