Our study showed that opium consumption, tobacco smoking, and chewing, but not alcohol consumption, are associated with higher risk of ESCC in Golestan Province. The area is well-placed to study the relationship between opium use and ESCC, both of which are common. A large proportion of the world's opium is produced in Afghanistan, which borders Iran, and it is still commonly used in this region as a traditional treatment of pain, diarrhoea, and insomnia. An ecologic study in northern Iran found that 50% (20 out of 40) of adults in ESCC high-risk areas, compared with only 11% (10 out of 90) of those in medium- or low-risk areas, tested positive for urine morphine metabolites (
Joint Iran–IARC Study Group, 1977). In a subsequent study of 1590 rural individuals, the prevalence of appreciable levels (
![[gt-or-equal, slanted]](/corehtml/pmc/pmcents/ges.gif)
1
μg

ml
−1) of urinary morphine metabolites was almost six-fold higher among residents of high-risk
vs low-risk areas (
Ghadirian et al, 1985). Among the spouses of 41 cases and 41 age-matched controls, there was a two-fold, nonsignificant, increased risk associated with the presence of urinary morphine metabolites.
Previous studies in Iran (
Cook-Mozaffari et al, 1979;
Ghadirian et al, 1985) avoided using questionnaires to ask about opium use, partly because it can be a sensitive subject in many populations, which may limit the validity of questionnaire responses. This was tested during the pilot phase of an ongoing cohort study in Golestan by interviewing subjects twice and collecting urine samples twice, 2 months apart (
Abnet et al, 2004). Overall agreement between the responses in the two interviews for ever using opium was excellent and above 0.99, the corresponding
κ-statistic being 0.96 (
Abnet et al, 2004). The validity of self-reported current opium use was also high. Using the presence of codeine or morphine in the urine, self-report had a sensitivity of 0.93 and specificity of 0.89 (
Abnet et al, 2004), so we accepted questionnaire to document opium use. The results of our study showed a two-fold increased risk of ESCC associated with opium use. People in Golestan may start using opiates to alleviate pain prior to their cancer diagnosis and, therefore, reverse causality is a concern. However, excluding the cases and controls who had recently started using opium from the analysis made no material difference in the study results, and younger age at first use was a strong predictor of cancer risk. Limiting the analysis to tobacco nonusers, the results remained essentially unchanged. The percentage of opium users in ESCC case subjects (30%) found in this study is close to the percentage (33%) found in the pilot phase study (
Islami et al, 2004).
The two forms of opium used by the subjects of this study were teriak (crude opium) and shireh (refined opium). Shireh is usually made by boiling teriak (or a mixture of teriak and opium pyrolysates obtained after smoking opium) with water, filtering the mixture several times, and, then, evaporating the filtrate until a gummy consistency is achieved. Both teriak and shireh can be smoked or ingested. We found that consumption of both teriak and shireh are common, and both are associated with increased risk of ESCC, also both, smoking and ingesting, alone or in combination.
Neither teriak nor shireh themselves were mutagenic in the Ames test (
Hewer et al, 1978). However, either smoking or inhaling the smoke involves exposure to potential carcinogens, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) to which industrial exposure may cause cancers of the lung, bladder, and skin (
Denissenko et al, 1996;
Boffetta et al, 1997;
Hecht, 2003). Smoke condensates from opium and morphine cause mutations in
Salmonella typhimurium (
Hewer et al, 1978;
Malaveille et al, 1982), sister chromatid exchanges in human lymphocytes (
Perry et al, 1983), and morphological transformations in cultured Syrian hamster embryo cells (
Friesen et al, 1985), whereas crude opium itself is not a mutagen (
Hewer et al, 1978;
Malaveille et al, 1982). The mechanisms responsible for the carcinogenic effects of opium and shireh need investigation.
In western countries, cigarette smoking increases ESCC risk by approximately 3–5-fold (
Tuyns, 1983;
Brown et al, 1994,
2001). However, in some high-risk areas, such as Linxian (China), smoking plays a much less significant role in the aetiology of ESCC, and the relative risk for ever-cigarette smoking is only 1.3 (
Tran et al, 2005). The case–control study conducted by IARC and IPHR in the 1970s in Golestan Province showed an almost two-fold risk of ESCC associated with tobacco smoking (
Cook-Mozaffari et al, 1979) and adjusted OR of 1.47 confirms a weak-to-moderate association in Golestan. Discordance between smoking prevalence and ESCC rates in women and men in these high risk areas, is in agreement with the finding of smoking is not a strong risk factor in these population. In Linxian, <1% of women and approximately 70% of men smoke (
Abnet et al, 2001), yet ESCC rates are nearly equal in the two sexes as in Golestan, where the prevalence of ever smoking ranges from 1% in rural women to 39% in urban men (
Pourshams et al, 2004), suggesting that most ESCC cases in Linxian and Golestan are due to other factors. This relatively weak association between smoking and ESCC risk may also be due in part to the relatively low cumulative tobacco exposure; median cumulative use among smoking controls in this study was only 13.5 pack-years.
The association of ESCC with smoking hookah or chewing nass has been little studied. In our study, although the CIs are wide, the point estimates suggest that these are at least as strong risk factors as cigarette smoking. Regular use of hookah may involve exposure to large amounts of tobacco combustion products. Because nass is a mixture of tobacco, ash, and lime (
Joint Iran–IARC Study Group, 1977;
Cook-Mozaffari et al, 1979;
Pourshams et al, 2004), it exposes users to carcinogens both in unburned tobacco (e.g., nitrosamines, PAHs, and aldehydes) and in ash (e.g., PAHs). In our study, both the intensity of hookah use and the intensity and duration of nass use showed positive trends with ESCC risk, but not duration of hookah use, perhaps partly due to people changing from hookah to cigarettes. Consistent with our findings, snus (Scandinavian moist snuff) use is associated with a three-fold significant increased risk of ESCC (
Zendehdel et al, 2008). However, there was no association between hookah or nass use and ESCC risk in the previous IARC–IPHR case–control study (
Cook-Mozaffari et al, 1979).
Like tobacco smoking, alcohol use is a major cause of ESCC in Western countries (
Jensen, 1979;
Tuyns, 1983;
Boffetta and Garfinkel, 1990;
Brown et al, 1994,
2001), but not in Linxian (
Tran et al, 2005), or Iran (
Joint Iran–IARC Study Group, 1977;
Pourshams et al, 2004), where consumption is very limited. In the West, alcohol intake is associated with a dose–response increase in ESCC risk, and heavy consumption increases risk by 5–15-fold (
Tuyns, 1983;
Boffetta and Garfinkel, 1990;
Brown et al, 1994;
Baan et al, 2007). In our study, approximately 2% of cases and 2% of controls had ever regularly used alcohol, which was not significantly associated with ESCC risk.
Overall agreement between responses to each of the cigarette, nass, and alcohol questions in the two interviews was above 0.99, and the corresponding
κ-statistics were all above 0.95 (
Abnet et al, 2004), showing excellent reliability.
Although the ESCC incidence rate is still high in Golestan Province, it has declined in the past few decades, particularly among younger people (
Semnani et al, 2006). Factors contributing to this decline may include improved socioeconomic status, more widespread access to piped water, and more fresh fruits and vegetable use due to greater availability of refrigerators. Also, the prevalence of opium use in our study was approximately half of that reported in the 1970s (
Ghadirian et al, 1985), when sukhteh use was common (
Hewer et al, 1978), but not reported by our subjects.
The strengths of this study include the relatively large sample size, strict matching for area of residence to avoid possibility of confounding by region, verification of the reliability and validity of questionnaires, histologic confirmation of all case diagnoses, and appropriate sensitivity analyses. Limitations include recall bias, but as most subjects were illiterate or with little education, and were unaware of the study hypotheses, it is unlikely that reported opium, tobacco, or alcohol use are differentially higher in case than in control subjects.