Using degenerate primers targeting the conserved regions II and IV of the mcp gene, we amplified nine additional mcp gene fragments from concentrated virus samples. All of these mapped phylogenetically to the Phycodnaviridae family (Fig. ). Similar amplicons were obtained from seven isolated dsDNA viruses infecting the algae Chrysochromulina ericina, Phaeocystis pouchetii, P. globosa, and Pyramimonas orientalis.
Due to insertions/deletions between the conserved regions II, III, and IV, the amplicons produced by the primers varied in size between 347 and 518 bp (Table ). Although it has previously been shown that some members of the
Phycodnaviridae contain introns or inteins in their DNA
polB genes, no such domain was identified using the CD-search algorithm (
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST) on the
mcp gene or amplified fragments (
27,
31). It therefore seems likely that the different sizes of the amplicons are due to structural differences in the protein between different viruses.
Although capable of amplifying products from most lysate and concentrated virus samples, the degenerate primers presented here are not universal for the current members of the Phycodnaviridae. Due to differences between gene sequences, it was not possible to include the nucleotide sequences of the two coccolithoviruses EhV-99B1 and EhV-86 and the two phaeoviruses EsV-1 and FirrV-1. When tested, the primers also failed to generate amplicons from one virus infecting Micromonas pusilla (MpV-12T).
The phylogenetic tree generated using the translated protein sequences of the amplified
mcp gene fragments supported the existence of the currently legitimate genera within the
Phycodnaviridae family. The previously unpublished sequences of CeV-01B, PpV-01, and PgV-16T formed one group and hence suggest the existence of a
Prymnesiovirus genus including viruses infecting prymnesiophytes (Fig. ,
Prymnesiovirus). The four viruses infecting the prasinophyte
Pyramimonas orientalis grouped into their own cluster (Fig. , group B). The only other dsDNA viruses which previously have been found to infect species of this algal class are viruses infecting
Micromonas pusilla (
8). Due to the failure of the primers to amplify products from these viruses, it was impossible to confirm the existence of the
Prasinovirus genus based on the
mcp sequence alone. The phylogenetic tree supported clustering of the
Coccolithovirus and
Phaeovirus genera, but these groups were found to diverge from the other members of the
Phycodnaviridae. Similar observations based on a combined comparison of eight conserved genes (excluding the
mcp gene) suggested that the coccolithoviruses should be recognized as a subfamily within the
Phycodnaviridae (
1). A revised phylogeny of
Mimiviridae and
Phycodnaviridae based on the DNA
polB gene was also discussed by Monier et al. (
29).
The NJ tree based on the conserved region of the DNA PolB protein sequence also maintained the current legitimate genera in the
Phycodnaviridae family, but the ancestry was different from that for the MCP tree. The phaeoviruses formed the same deep branching clade as in the MCP tree, but this clade did not include the coccolithoviruses. Viruses infecting prymnesiophytes appeared in two different clusters. One included viruses assigned to the
Prymnesiovirus genus (i.e., PgV-03T, PgV-06T, PgV-102P, and CbV-PW3) (
2,
9,
53), and one included the prymnesiophyte-infecting viruses CeV-01B and PpV-01 as well as the prasinophyte-infecting virus PoV-01B. This is in contrast with the
mcp tree, where PgV-16T clustered with the PpVs and CeVs, while the PoVs clustered outside, and could suggest possible horizontal gene transfer of DNA
polB within this group. These results also corroborate earlier studies indicating a divergence of the DNA
polB sequences of viruses infecting
Phaeocystis globosa (
53).
All of the phylogenetic analyses in this study indicate that mimivirus is more closely related to the chloroviruses, raphidoviruses, and especially the three newly assigned members CeV-01B, PpV-01, and PoV-01B than to other members of the
Phycodnaviridae (Fig. to ). This differs from a previous phylogenetic analysis where mimivirus was assigned to a separate family (
Mimiviridae) adjacent to the
Phycodnaviridae (
36). This analysis was based on the nine shared core genes of the NCLDVs, but the only
Phycodnaviridae sequence data available then were from PBCV-1 and EsV-1. Based on homology in the MCP and the DNA PolB protein, mimivirus seems to be more closely related to the PoV-01B, PpV-01, CeV-01B, and PBCV-1 viruses of the
Phycodnaviridae than the EhV-86, EsV-1, and FirrV-1 viruses are. A closer relationship between mimivirus and members currently assigned to the
Phycodnaviridae family than was previously reported is also suggested by the fact that mimivirus contains all eight conserved domains identified in the
mcp genes of the
Phycodnaviridae (Fig. ).
Many of the sequences retrieved from the Sargasso Sea metagenome showed strong homology to the sequences from the
Phycodnaviridae, while others showed no relationship to any phycodnaviruses with a known host. One large cluster inferred from the MCP tree (Fig. , group A) branched off close to the
Chlorovirus cluster. This cluster included both sequences from the Sargasso Sea metagenome and five OTUs from this study. A similar cluster branching off close to the
Chlorovirus genus was also inferred from the DNA PolB sequences (Fig. , group C and
Prasinovirus). This cluster included viruses known to infect the prasinophyte
Micromonas pusilla. The presence of closely related viral sequences in as geographically distant locations as Norwegian fjords and the Sargasso Sea is in agreement with previous studies (
4,
39). The relatively large number of sequences phylogenetically distinct from any known phycodnavirus may be interpreted to suggest the presence of a yet unknown genus with wide geographical distributions.
As could be expected based on their host range, no close relatives of the
Chlorovirus genus were identified in the Sargasso Sea metagenome. Interestingly, this also seemed to be the case for HaV-1 and the phaeoviruses, while only a few related sequences were identified as having homology to the coccolithoviruses. This observation may reflect the small number of species identified within these families of algal hosts. For instance, only 3
Heterosigma species are currently reported in the Algaebase species list (version 4.2;
http://www.algaebase.org), whereas 56 species of
Chrysochromulina are listed. This could suggest a coupling of the diversity within the algal host range to the diversity in the individual genera of
Phycodnaviridae viruses. However, it should be noted that the difference could also be due to geographical variations as well as to the restricted target range of the currently available universal primers targeting this family.
By applying degenerate primers targeting the
mcp gene, we obtained sequences from three
Chrysochromulina ericina-infecting viruses that were isolated between 1998 and 2006 and from two
Phaeocystis pouchetii-infecting viruses, isolated in 1995 and 2002. The amplified sequences were 518 and 500 bp, respectively, and both sets showed 100% homology at the nucleotide level (Fig. ,
Prymnesiovirus). In contrast, the four virus isolates infecting
Pyramimonas orientalis were much more divergent, with various sizes of the amplicons and sequence similarities ranging from 79 to 93% between the strains (Fig. , group B). Although this finding could be due to paralogous genes in PoV and none in CeV and PpV, we did not get a 100% homology hit when BLAST searching with the obtained fragments from PoVs against the available contigs of the PoV-01B genome. Thus, it seems that the evolution of at least this gene is much more constrained in the CeVs and PpVs, while the
mcp gene is much more plastic in the PoVs. It is tempting to interpret this to reflect differences in virus-host interactions. Species within the algal genera
Phaeocystis and, to some extent,
Chrysochromulina form blooms, and the respective virus isolates are stable and easily kept in culture (unpublished observations).
Pyramimonas is not a bloom former, the virus shows variable properties in culture (e.g., variable lysis and burst size), and infectivity is easily lost. Thyrhaug et al. (
44,
45) showed that cultures of
Phaeocystis pouchetii,
Emiliana huxleyi, and
Chrysochromulina ericina that recovered after viral lysis could coexist with their respective viruses at high abundances. In contrast, the concentration of PoV in recovered cultures of
Pyramimonas orientalis decreased after 2 weeks (
45). This could suggest that PoV particles have a higher decay rate or that
P. orientalis has a lower susceptibility to viral infection. The latter theory may explain the high genetic diversity observed for PoV as a result of an increased arms race between virus and host. The alternative interpretation that the degenerate primers were able to amplify products from only one particular genotype of PpV and CeV but from many PoV genotypes seems unlikely, since the primers amplified products successfully from all the tested isolates of these viruses.
The results of this study suggest that the MCP of large dsDNA viruses can be a useful genetic marker for generating preliminary phylogenetic trees. The data also confirm the assignment of CeV-01B, PpV-01, and PoV-01B to the
Phycodnaviridae family (
20,
37). CeV-01B and PpV-01 infect prymnesiophytes but did not cluster with viruses in the
Prymnesiovirus genus, based on the conserved region of the DNA
polB gene (Fig. ). Likewise, PoV-01B infects a prasinophyte but did not cluster with viruses infecting
Micromonas pusilla, which are the only known members of the
Prasinovirus genus (Fig. ). This could imply different ancestries of the
mcp and DNA
polB genes of these viruses. The grouping of phycodnaviruses into genera has previously been based mainly on host range and phylogenetic analysis based on the DNA PolB protein (
5,
8,
10,
22). Genome comparison has indicated that the current tree needs revision (
1). Based on the phylogenetic analysis reported in this study, the status of the
Coccolithovirus and
Phaeovirus genera is suggested to change. Also, the results suggest that a general revision of the phylogeny of viruses belonging to the
Phycodnaviridae and of mimivirus is needed. However, in order to confirm these results, a thorough comparison of the complete genomes, including phylogenetic analysis of all the core genes, is required.