PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of canjsurgCanandian Journal of SurgerySubmit a ManuscriptEmail AlertsAbout CJS
 
Can J Surg. 2008 February; 51(1): 8–14.
PMCID: PMC2386310

A sample of Canadian orthopedic surgeons expressed willingness to participate in osteoporosis management for fragility fracture patients

Abstract

Objective

The orthopedic community is in a unique position to initiate and provide osteoporosis care in fragility fracture patients to prevent future hip fractures in a high-risk population. The attitudes and intentions of Canadian orthopedic surgeons in the domain of osteoporosis care are unknown. Our objective was to identify current attitudes and osteoporosis management practices and to determine their overall willingness to participate in osteoporosis care for fragility fracture patients.

Methods

A real-time interactive polling session was conducted at the 58th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Orthopaedic Association.

Results

Of the orthopedic surgeons who responded, 90.4% agreed that the current emphasis on osteoporosis in orthopedic practice is appropriate; 85.2% of surgeons indicated that they currently refer or personally investigate for osteoporosis, or both, in fragility fracture patients.

Conclusion

Most of the Canadian orthopedic surgeons sampled consider themselves to be currently engaged or ready to engage in osteoporosis care for fragility fracture patients. Focus should now shift from education and persuasion to program support through provision of resources and system modification that will enable Canadian orthopedic surgeons to effectively manage osteoporosis in their fracture patients.

Résumé

Objectif

Les milieux orthopédiques sont particulièrement bien placés pour initier le traitement de l'ostéoporose chez les patients qui ont eu une fracture de fragilité, afin de prévenir de futures fractures de la hanche dans une population à risque élevé. On ne connaît pas les attitudes et les intentions des chirurgiens orthopédistes canadiens face au traitement de l'ostéoporose. Nous voulions déterminer les pratiques et les attitudes courantes face à la prise en charge de l'ostéoporose, et savoir dans quelle mesure les chirurgiens orthopédistes sont disposés en général à participer au soin de l'ostéoporose chez les patients qui ont subi une fracture de fragilité.

Méthodes

On a organisé une séance de sondage interactive en temps réel au cours de la 58e assemblée annuelle de l'Association canadienne d'orthopédie.

Résultats

Parmi les chirurgiens orthopédistes qui ont répondu, 90,4 % ont reconnu que l'importance attachée actuellement à l'ostéoporose dans la pratique de l'orthopédie est appropriée; 85,2 % des chirurgiens ont indiqué que leur pratique actuelle consiste à référer les patients qui ont eu une fracture de fragilité ou à tester eux-mêmes pour déterminer s'il y a ostéoporose, ou les deux.

Conclusion

La plupart des chirurgiens orthopédistes canadiens sondés considèrent qu'ils s'occupent de l'ostéoporose chez les patients qui ont subi une fracture de fragilité ou qu'ils sont disposés à le faire. Il faudrait maintenant réorienter les efforts d'éducation et de persuasion vers le soutien des programmes en fournissant des ressources et en modifiant le système de façon à permettre aux chirurgiens orthopédistes canadiens de prendre en charge efficacement l'ostéoporose chez leurs patients qui ont subi une fracture.

Among practitioners and professional associations in Canada and elsewhere, interest is growing in the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in patients who have sustained a fragility fracture. Prevalent fragility fracture is increasingly identified in the literature as the most predictive element for future hip fracture.1–6 It is now well established that treatment of osteoporosis is effective in preventing subsequent hip and vertebral fractures in high-risk populations.7–15

Patients who are at high risk for future hip fractures by virtue of prevalent fragility fracture, and therefore in need of osteoporosis therapy, present daily to orthopedic surgeons in fracture clinics. No other body of health care professionals is engaged in treating the complications of osteoporosis (i.e., fragility fracture) as often as the orthopedic community. When treating a fragility fracture, orthopedic surgeons have a unique opportunity to alter long-term health outcomes (i.e., the prevention of hip fracture) by referring the patient or by personally initiating investigation and treatment of osteoporosis. However, published studies have demonstrated that the proportion of fragility fracture patients who receive appropriate osteoporosis investigation and treatment from any physician is low,16 and a perception exists that orthopedic surgeons are not engaged in osteoporosis care. For example, investigation of osteoporosis by bone mineral density testing was reported to be low: 14 of 16 studies reported investigation of less than 32% of patients.16 Further, there was only moderate use of calcium and vitamin D (8%–62%, median 18%) and bisphosphonates (0.5%–38%) in patients who were investigated for osteoporosis following fragility fracture.

The Canadian Orthopaedic Association (COA) formally endorsed the 2002 clinical practice guidelines for the management and treatment of osteoporosis produced by the scientific body of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada.17 At an annual meeting of the COA, orthopedic surgeons were polled to assess their current attitudes and practices with respect to osteoporosis referral and management in patients with a fragility fracture.

Methods

The 58th Annual Meeting of the COA in Winnipeg, Manitoba, which took place October 3–5, 2003, included an osteoporosis symposium, a 90-minute plenary session on the key topics in osteoporosis care that are relevant to orthopedic practitioners. This was followed by a real-time interactive polling session.

Polling questions (Appendix 1) were designed to identify current attitudes and osteoporosis management practices of attendees and to determine their overall willingness to participate in osteoporosis care for fragility fracture patients. Demographics obtained included health profession (used as the primary identifier), age, geographic region and community size. Additional information collected included current management and prescribing practices for patients with a fragility fracture, attitudes toward the growing emphasis on osteoporosis in orthopedic practice and concerns regarding medicolegal issues.

To compare the sample of orthopedic surgeon respondents with the general population of Canadian orthopedic surgeons, we obtained demographic information from the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (Table 1).

Table thumbnail
Table 1

Results

The osteoporosis symposium was attended by more than 150 registrants, of whom 110 participated in the polling session and answered some or all of the questions.

Demographics

Of the 104 individuals who responded to the question on practitioner type, 70 (67.3%) identified themselves as orthopedic surgeons; 16 (15.4%) as students, graduate students or residents; 13 (12.5%) as allied health professionals; and 5 (4.8%) as orthopedic research scientists. The majority (49 of 69, 71%) of orthopedic surgeons were aged 45 years or older; nonorthopedic surgeons were predominantly 44 years old or younger (29 of 41, 70.7%).

One-half (34 of 68) of orthopedic surgeons indicated that they were in academic practice (Table 2); the remaining surgeons were either from a large city or community practice (19 of 68, 27.9%) or from a small city or rural environment (15 of 68, 22.1%). Orthopedic surgeons were predominantly from Ontario (23 of 67, 34.3%) and the Prairie provinces (21 of 67, 31.3%) (Table 3). Results for all questions were similar for respondents from the 5 regions of Canada surveyed (Table 3).

Table thumbnail
Table 3
Table thumbnail
Table 2

There are currently 1088 orthopedic surgeons registered with the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, 956 of whom report that they are in full-time orthopedic practice (Table 1). The polling respondents represent only 7.3% (70 of 956) of the total; however, the respondents' age distributions are similar to the age profile of the Canadian membership. The academic or community practice self-report of the respondents (50% and 50%; Table 2) corresponds to the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada data regarding practice type (Table 1).

Treatment and prescribing practices

Of the 54 orthopedic surgeons who responded, 32 (59.3%) reported that they refer for investigation and treatment of osteoporosis in fragility fracture patients, 10 (18.5%) personally investigate and then refer for treatment, and 4 (7.4%) personally investigate and treat (Table 2). The individuals who personally investigate for osteoporosis were all aged 45 years or older.

When asked about their prescribing practices for treating a patient with fragility fracture and osteoporosis, 66 orthopedic surgeons responded (Table 2); 26 (39.4%) indicated they were comfortable prescribing calcium and vitamin D, while 18 (27.3%) would also prescribe bisphosphonates and only 2 (3.0%) reported that they would prescribe hormone replacement therapy. Of 20 surgeons aged 44 years or younger, 9 (45%) indicated that they were not comfortable prescribing any of these treatments.

Attitudes and perceptions

Of the 63 orthopedic surgeons who responded, 57 (90.4%) agreed that the current emphasis on osteoporosis in orthopedic practice is appropriate (Table 2); 84.1% (53 of 63) felt that orthopedic surgeons should treat patients with osteoporosis, compared with 6.3% (4 of 63) who felt they should only identify and refer.

The majority of orthopedic surgeons (36 of 59, 61.0%) were not concerned about medicolegal liability arising from actively participating in osteoporosis care (Table 2); older surgeons were more likely to be unconcerned than younger ones (28 of 42, 66.7% v. 7 of 16, 43.8%, respectively). The rest were concerned about medicolegal liability; however, more felt at risk from not taking action regarding osteoporosis (17 of 59, 28.8%) than from pursuing osteoporosis interventions (6 of 59, 10.2%).

Discussion

A high proportion of Canadian orthopedic respondents identified themselves as supporting the current emphasis on addressing osteoporosis in fragility fracture patients; most were unconcerned about medicolegal issues related to doing so. Most said they were engaged in osteoporosis care, either through referral or personal investigation, and were comfortable with prescribing treatments including calcium, vitamin D and, to a lesser degree, bisphosphonates. Of note was the finding that older surgeons were more likely than younger surgeons to personally investigate and treat for osteoporosis.

These findings collectively suggest that at least this sample of Canadian orthopedic surgeons is committed to osteoporosis care. However, previous studies demonstrate that in Canada and in other economically advanced countries only a small proportion of fragility fracture patients are receiving appropriate osteoporosis care.16 The discrepancy between attitudes and former behaviours may relate to difficulties in achieving osteoporosis interventions in busy fracture clinics and inpatient orthopedic environments. It may also reflect a recent change in attitudes resulting from various Canadian and international initiatives to inform orthopedic surgeons about this type of management.

Barriers to osteoporosis care for fragility fracture patients include cost of therapy, time and cost of diagnosis and treatment, concerns about the effectiveness of medications and lack of clarity about who is responsible for the initiation and management of these medications.16 Several Ontario programs are currently targeting osteoporosis management in the fragility fracture patient population. The Osteoporosis Exemplary Care Program at St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, uses a full-time osteoporosis coordinator and has improved the rate of osteoporosis referral to over 95% for both inpatient and outpatient populations.18 The Ontario Orthopaedic Association– Osteoporosis Canada “Lucky Break” program, implemented in all 72 Ontario fracture clinics where there is orthopedic involvement, increased clinic staff awareness of osteoporosis in fragility fracture patients.19 Several other programs across Canada are also addressing postfracture osteoporosis care.20–23 The Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care has announced funding for a provincial osteoporosis strategy that will include postfracture osteoporosis screening in fracture clinics.

A potential source of bias is that orthopedic surgeons most interested in osteoporosis care possibly self-selected to attend the COA plenary session and participate in the polling. The circumstances surrounding the meeting represent another potential source of selection bias; it was originally planned to take place in Toronto but was moved to Winnipeg owing to the SARS situation, with a consequent lower attendance rate. Finally, the lower response rate to 2 questions in this real-time poll (regarding current practice when treating a patient who has a fragility fracture and medicolegal issues) introduces a level of uncertainty to interpreting the data for these questions. Possibly, some attendees briefly stepped out of the room and missed a question, the available responses might not have been clear, or they could not decide which response best reflected their own practices.

The polling results at this conference demonstrate that the orthopedic representatives who participated (and possibly the wider Canadian orthopedic community) consider themselves to be currently engaged or ready to engage in osteoporosis care for fragility fracture patients. The polling results suggest that Canadian orthopedic surgeons are highly aware of osteoporosis in fragility fracture patients and largely positive about participation in care. Interested parties should now shift focus to identifying and providing the resources and system modifications that are required to support these attitudes and to enable Canadian orthopedic surgeons to effectively provide osteoporosis care to their fragility fracture patients.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Canadian orthopedic surgeons who participated in the polling. Merck Frosst Canada, Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Eli Lilly Canada Inc. provided an unrestricted educational grant to support the symposium and polling session. Victoria Elliot-Gibson, Dagmar Gross and Megan Morrison assisted in the preparation of the manuscript.

Notes

Contributors: Dr. Bogoch designed the study. Both authors acquired and analyzed the data. Both authors wrote and revised the article, and both gave final approval for the article to be published.

Competing interests: None declared.

Accepted for publication Oct. 20, 2006

Correspondence to: Dr. Earl R. Bogoch, 55 Queen St. E, Suite 800, Toronto ON M5C 1R6; fax 416 359-1601; bogoche/at/smh.toronto.on.ca

References

1. Ettinger B, Ray GT, Pressman AR, et al. Limb fractures in elderly men as indicators of subsequent fracture. Arch Intern Med2003;163:2741-7. [PubMed]
2. Haentjens P, Autier P, Collins J, et al. Colles fracture, spine fracture and subsequent risk for hip fracture in men and women: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am2003;85:1936-43. [PubMed]
3. Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C, et al. A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk. Bone2004;35:375-82. [PubMed]
4. Klotzbuecher CM, Ross PD, Landsman PB, et al. Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Miner Res2000;15:721-39. [PubMed]
5. Melton LJ III, Atkinson EJ, Cooper C, et al. Vertebral fractures predict subsequent fractures. Osteoporos Int1999;10:214-21. [PubMed]
6. Wiktorowicz ME, Goeree R, Papaioannou A, et al. Economic implications of hip fracture: health service use, institutional care and cost in Canada. Osteoporos Int2001;12:271-8. [PubMed]
7. Black DM, Thompson DE, Bauer DC, et al. Fracture risk reduction with alendronate in women with osteoporosis: the fracture intervention trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab2000;85:4118-24. [PubMed]
8. Cranney A, Tugwell P, Adachi J, et al. Meta-analyses of therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. III. Meta-analysis of risedronate for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Endocr Rev2002;23:517-23. [PubMed]
9. Cranney A, Wells G, Willan A, et al. Meta-analyses of therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. II. Meta-analysis of alendronate for the treatment of postmenopausal women. Endocr Rev2002;23: 508-16. [PubMed]
10. Hodsman AB, Hanley DA, Josse R. Do bisphosphonates reduce the risk of osteoporotic fractures? An evaluation of the evidence to date. CMAJ2002;166:1426-30. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Johnell O, Scheele WH, Lu Y, et al. Additive effects of raloxifene and alendronate on bone density and biochemical markers of bone remodeling in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab2002;87:985-92. [PubMed]
12. Orwoll E, Ettinger M, Weiss S, et al. Alendronate for the treatment of osteoporosis in men. N Engl J Med2000;343: 604-10. [PubMed]
13. Panneman MJ, Lips P, Sen SS, et al. Undertreatment with anti-osteoporotic drugs after hospitalization for fracture. Osteoporos Int2004;15:120-4. [PubMed]
14. Papadimitropoulos EA, Coyte PC, Josse RG, et al. Current and projected rates of hip fracture in Canada. CMAJ1997;157: 1357-63. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Schnitzer T, Bone HG, Crepaldi G, et al. Therapeutic equivalence of alendronate 70 mg once-weekly and alendronate 10 mg daily in the treatment of osteoporosis. Alendronate Once-Weekly Study Group. Aging (Milano)2000;12:1-12. [PubMed]
16. Elliot-Gibson V, Bogoch ER, Jamal SA, et al. Practice patterns in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis after a fragility fracture: a systematic review. Osteoporos Int2004;15:767-78. [PubMed]
17. Brown JP, Josse RG. Scientific Advisory Council of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada. 2002 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada. CMAJ2002;167: S1-34. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Bogoch ER, Elliot-Gibson V, Beaton DE, et al. Effective initiation of osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment for patients with a fragility fracture in an orthopaedic environment. J Bone Joint Surg Am2006;88: 25-34. [PubMed]
19. Skelly A. Fractures prompt osteoporosis care. Med Post.2003;Oct 28;18.
20. Ashe M, Khan K, Guy P, et al. Wristwatch-distal radial fracture as a marker for osteoporosis investigation: a controlled trial of patient education and a physician alerting system. J Hand Ther2004;17: 324-8. [PubMed]
21. Jaglal S, Bogoch E, Cadarette S, et al. Development of a model for integrated post-fracture care in Ontario. Toronto: Ontario Women's Health Council; 2003.
22. Majumdar SR, Rowe BH, Folk D, et al. A controlled trial to increase detection and treatment of osteoporosis in older patients with a wrist fracture. Ann Intern Med2004;141:366-73. [PubMed]
23. Majumdar SR, Soumerai SB. Why most interventions to improve physician prescribing do not seem to work. CMAJ2003;169:30-1. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association