PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of brjcancerBJC HomepageBJC Advance online publicationBJC Current IssueSubmitting an article to BJCWeb feeds
 
Br J Cancer. 2003 April 7; 88(7): 1091–1094.
Published online 2003 April 1. doi:  10.1038/sj.bjc.6600868
PMCID: PMC2376386

Marker genes for circulating tumour cells predict survival in metastasized breast cancer patients

Metastases in breast cancer may arise through either lymphatic spread or through hematogenous dissemination. While the local treatment of breast cancer is quite successful and modern treatment can adequately deal with local lymph node metastases, a substantial proportion of breast cancer patients ultimately die from metastases to distant organs or tissues. Micrometastatic disease may be cured by adjuvant systemic therapy and the ability to detect it reliably would thus be a significant advance. We have recently shown that the tendency for hematogenous spread can already be shown in small tumours, using messenger-RNA (mRNA) expression profiling (van 't Veer et al, 2002). In addition, we and others have developed immunological and RNA-based methods to detect circulating tumour cells in blood, bone marrow and other nonbreast tissues (Lambrechts et al, 1998). There is evidence that the presence of epithelial cells in the bone marrow of patients with early breast cancer correlates with prognosis (Braun et al, 2000). Antibody-based methods to detect these occult tumour cells have, however, not gained widespread clinical use because of significant numbers of false-positive results (Lambrechts et al, 1998,1999).

RNA-based methods have been used to detect the presence of mRNA species in RNA isolations from peripheral blood mononuclear cells that are characteristic of epithelial cells and that may originate from circulating tumour cells. The main problem of RNA-based assays continues to be the almost universally present background signal (Traweek et al, 1993; Datta et al, 1994; Burchill et al, 1995; Krismann et al, 1995; Fields et al, 1996; Moscinski et al, 1996; Mapara et al, 1997; Zippelius et al, 1997). We have recently developed a method that overcomes these problems by making use of two relatively recent developments. First, a truly quantitative PCR has become available, which is known as ‘real-time PCR’ (Bieche et al, 1999). Second, we have selected mRNA species using SAGE that are not present in peripheral blood RNA isolates or in bone marrow cells of healthy volunteers, but that are highly expressed in most breast cancers (Bosma et al, 2002). A panel of four marker genes (p1B, PS2, CK19 and EGP2) was used to detect circulating tumour cells in the peripheral blood of breast cancer patients; peripheral blood samples of healthy females were used as controls. Using a quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA), a score function based on the mRNA levels of the four genes was derived which, when positive, predicts the presence of circulating tumour cells (Bosma et al, 2002). This assay yields positive results in roughly 30% of the patients receiving treatment for advanced breast cancer. Here we show that a positive discriminant value is more frequent in patients with bone metastases and is furthermore associated with a reduced survival.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients

This study is based on the same patient series as reported earlier (Bosma et al, 2002). One hundred and three patients with advanced breast cancer, who were under treatment at the outpatient clinic of the Netherlands Cancer Institute, were asked to participate in the study. No other selection criteria were applied. Patients receiving hormonal treatment, intravenous administration of bisphosphanates or who were undergoing chemotherapy (or any combination) were eligible. Blood samples were collected during a routine follow-up visit in the Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek hospital between 1997 and 1998. A written informed consent was obtained from all the patients and the study was approved by the institute's protocol review committee.

Patient characteristics and follow-up information were extracted from the clinical charts. These included demographical data, the date of diagnosis of breast cancer, performance status, sites of metastatic disease, haemoglobin, white blood cell (WBC) count, platelets, LDH, CEA and CA15.3. In addition, the presence of either progressive or responding disease at the time of blood sampling was noted. The dates for first treatment progression and death were also extracted from the charts.

For this study, nine of the 103 patients had to be excluded because they were not under further treatment at the NKI and had been lost in follow-up, leaving 94 patients for the analysis.

Statistics

The QDA score function as defined earlier (Bosma et al, 2002) was calculated from the expression levels of the four marker genes p1B, PS2, CK19 and EGP2. A threshold was set that gave the maximum number of correctly classified patients in the breast cancer group (sensitivity) at zero misclassified normal controls (specificity was set to 100%) (Bosma et al, 2002).

Survival was calculated from the date of blood sample to the date of last follow-up (censored) or date of death from any cause (event). Progression-free survival was calculated from the date of blood sampling to the date of last follow-up (censored) or date of progression/death from any cause (event). Patients, in whom evidence of progression was present at the date of blood sample, were assigned a progression-free survival of zero months. (Progression-free) survival curves were calculated using the method of Kaplan–Meier and compared using the likelihood ratio test based on proportional hazard regression analysis.

Proportional-hazard regression analysis was used to adjust the association between QDA and survival or progression-free survival for confounding by any other metastastic site (liver, bone, lung or other sites) or form of treatment (chemotherapy, hormonal therapy or both).

The median follow-up from the date of blood sampling for all the 94 patients included is 15 months (range 0.4 – 53) and for the 17 patients still alive 45 months (12 – 53).

RESULTS

Ninety-four breast cancer patients with metastatic disease were studied for the prognostic significance of positive breast cancer marker gene expression in their peripheral blood. All the patients had metastatic disease, most of them had metastases at several locations. Twelve patients did not receive any systemic treatment at the time of blood sampling, 36 patients received chemotherapy, 39 hormonal treatment and seven received both (patient characteristics, see Table 1). The circulating breast tumour cell assay by real-time PCR quantification for the four marker genes p1B, PS2, CK19 and EGP2 revealed that 29 out of 94 patients had a positive discriminant value for circulating breast tumour cells, as reported earlier (Bosma et al, 2002).

Table 1
Clinical characteristics of 94 breast cancer patients with M1 disease

A positive test for circulating tumour cells was (almost exclusively) found in patients with bone metastases (Figure 1). Twenty-six of the 72 patients (36%) with bone metastases had a positive QDA value, versus three of the 22 patients (13.6%) without bone metastases (χ2 test P=0.037). A positive QDA value was also associated with liver metastases. Thirteen of the 27 patients (48%) with liver metastases had a positive QDA value, versus 16 of the 67 patients (24%) without liver metastases (χ2 test P=0.022, data not shown). Logistic regression analysis revealed that these associations are independent of each other. The results of the circulating breast cancer cell assay were further correlated with each of the quantitative data extracted from the patient charts. There was no apparent relation with age, the time since primary diagnosis, levels of LDH or tumour markers, WBC counts or platelet count or with the presence of disease progression at the time of sampling.

Figure 1
Twenty-six of the 72 patients with bone metastases (BM+) had a positive QDA value against three of the 22 patients without bone involvement (BM−) (χ2 test P=0.037). We previously defined a cutoff value of zero QDA arbitrary ...

Thirty-three percent of the patients had progressive disease at the date of the blood sampling (31 out of 94). After 6 months, 33% were still alive without progression, after 12 months 16%, after 2 years 10% and after 4 years 5%. There is evidence (P=0.015) that progression-free survival is worse for patients with a positive QDA value from the four marker genes (Figure 2). The presence of circulating tumour cell mRNA in the peripheral blood is clearly associated with a worse overall survival (P=0.0053, Figure 3). The median survival of patients with a positive test was 6 months, while the median survival of patients with a negative test was 18 months. No difference between positive and negative QDA patients was found regarding the interval between diagnosis and blood drawing (t-test: P=0.71).

Figure 2
Kaplan–Meier curves for progression-free survival in patients with or without a positive test for circulating tumour cells (likelihood ratio test; P=0.015). Patients at risk at each time point (years) are indicated for ‘QDA positive’ ...
Figure 3
Kaplan–Meier curves for overall survival of patients with or without circulating tumour cells (likelihood ratio test; P=0.0053). Patients at risk at each time point (years) are indicated for ‘QDA positive’ (black) and ‘QDA ...

The poor prognosis observed in patients with circulating tumour cells is not simply because of the more frequent presence of bone metastases: as expected, bone metastases were not a particularly negative prognostic feature for breast cancer patients with stage IV disease (Figure 4, P=0.93).

Figure 4
Kaplan–Meier curves for overall survival with respect to the presence of bone metastases. No prognostic value was found for the presence of bone metastases (likelihood ratio test; P=0.93). Patients at risk at each time point (years) are ...

DISCUSSION

Many methods have been evaluated to reliably detect circulating tumour cells in breast cancer and in other solid malignancies, with the purpose to serve as prognostic marker. All are either based on the presence of epithelial or tumour-specific antigens in circulating cells or are based on the demonstration of RNA-species in peripheral blood cells that indicate the presence of epithelial or tumour cells. However, assays of both types have been associated with false-positive results.

Recently, the real-time PCR provided a major step forward in the power to quantitatively analyse low abundance RNA species (Bieche et al, 1999) and may ensure the specificity that is required for a clinically useful test. Using this method, we have recently described the identification of four marker genes for the detection of occult tumour cells in breast cancer patients and determined how the respective expression levels can be combined by QDA to allow the avoidance of false-positive results (Bosma et al, 2002). In the peripheral blood of a series of patients with metastatic breast cancer who were receiving systemic treatment but were otherwise unselected, 30% of the patients revealed a positive QDA. Here we show that this positive QDA value is associated with the presence of bone metastases and predicts a significantly shortened survival, whereas bone metastases do not.

Our results show that the test has a clear biological correlate and may truly represent the presence of circulating breast cancer cells. It is tempting to speculate that particularly tumour cells lodging in the bone marrow, that are responsible for bone metastases, may spill over into the blood and circulate through the body. It could also be that our patients with bone metastases and liver metastases had a larger total tumour volume than the other patients. It is not possible to determine this retrospectively. In fact, a multivariate analysis for survival that did take the site of metastasis and form of therapy into account, resulted in an increase of the P-value for the QDA score for survival to P=0.094, and was thus not significant (data not shown). Our test for circulating tumour cells was, however, not designed to predict progression-free survival, but rather to establish a biological correlate.

We could, however, exclude the possibility that the interval between the date of the first metastasis detected and the time, at which the blood sample was drawn, influenced the QDA value (Figure 5). For 86 patients, the time of the detection of the first metastasis was available. In the interval of 6 months between the date of the first metastasis and blood sampling, 29% (eight out of 28) of the patients have a positive QDA value, compared with 29% (nine out of 31) in the subsequent interval of one-and-a-half years and 37% (10 out of 27) in the interval between 2 and 12 years. This shows that the positivity for the four marker genes is independent from the time when the blood sample is drawn in a metastasized patient. Thus, the detection of circulating tumour cells is not correlated with initial time or interval after the diagnosis of metastatic disease.

Figure 5
Distribution of the QDA value with respect to the interval between the detection of the first metastasis and the time of blood sampling for 86 breast cancer patients.

At present, it is not clear whether patients with a positive circulating tumour cell test would benefit from different, maybe more intensive treatment. The presence of micrometastatic disease and of circulating tumour cells may be of much greater importance in the management of patients with early (stages I – III) breast cancer. In this situation, prognostic information is essential to appropriately select patients for adjuvant therapy, such as hormone treatment and/or chemotherapy. We have recently shown, using expression profiling that even in early, lymph node-negative tumours, a group of patients can be identified who have a poor prognosis (van 't Veer et al, 2002). A reliable circulating tumour cell assay could help in the identification of additional mRNA-expression patterns that are associated with this unfavourable biologic property and could also provide independent information further narrowing down the specific risk category.

References

  • Bieche I, Laurendeau I, Tozlu S, Olivi M, Vidaud D, Lidereau R, Vidaud M. Quantitation of MYC gene expression in sporadic breast tumors with a real-time reverse transcription – PCR assay. Cancer Res. 1999;59:2759–2765. [PubMed]
  • Bosma AJ, Weigelt B, Lambrechts AC, Verhagen OJ, Pruntel R, Hart AAM, Rodenhuis S, van 't Veer LJ. Detection of circulating breast tumor cells by differential expression of marker genes. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8:1871–1877. [PubMed]
  • Braun S, Pantel K, Muller P, Janni W, Hepp F, Kentenich CR, Gastroph S, Wischnik A, Dimpfl T, Kindermann G, Riethmuller G, Schlimok G. Cytokeratin-positive cells in the bone marrow and survival of patients with stage I, II, or III breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:525–533. [PubMed]
  • Burchill SA, Bradbury MF, Pittman K, Southgate J, Smith B, Selby P. Detection of epithelial cancer cells in peripheral blood by reverse transcriptase – polymerase chain reaction. Br J Cancer. 1995;71:278–281. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Datta YH, Adams PT, Drobyski WR, Ethier SP, Terry VH, Roth MS. Sensitive detection of occult breast cancer by the reverse-transcriptase – polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12:475–482. [PubMed]
  • Fields KK, Elfenbein GJ, Trudeau WL, Perkins JB, Janssen WE, Moscinski LC. Clinical significance of bone marrow metastases as detected using the polymerase chain reaction in patients with breast cancer undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14:1868–1876. [PubMed]
  • Krismann M, Todt B, Schroder J, Gareis D, Muller KM, Seeber S, Schutte J. Low specificity of cytokeratin 19 reverse transcriptase – polymerase chain reaction analyses for detection of hematogenous lung cancer dissemination. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13:2769–2775. [PubMed]
  • Lambrechts AC, Bosma AJ, Klaver SG, Top B, Perebolte L, van’t Veer LJ, Rodenhuis S. Comparison of immunocytochemistry, reverse transcriptase – polymerase chain reaction, and nucleic acid sequence-based amplification for the detection of circulating breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1999;53:219–231.
  • Lambrechts AC, van ’t Veer LJ, Rodenhuis S. The detection of minimal numbers of contaminating epithelial tumor cells in blood or bone marrow: use, limitations and future of RNA-based methods. Ann Oncol. 1998;9:1269–1276. [PubMed]
  • Mapara MY, Korner IJ, Hildebrandt M, Bargou R, Krahl D, Reichardt P, Dorken B. Monitoring of tumor cell purging after highly efficient immunomagnetic selection of CD34 cells from leukapheresis products in breast cancer patients: comparison of immunocytochemical tumor cell staining and reverse transcriptase – polymerase chain reaction. Blood. 1997;89:337–344. [PubMed]
  • Moscinski LC, Trudeau WL, Fields KK, Elfenbein GJ. High-sensitivity detection of minimal residual breast carcinoma using the polymerase chain reaction and primers for cytokeratin 19. Diagn Mol Pathol. 1996;5:173–180. [PubMed]
  • Traweek ST, Liu J, Battifora H. Keratin gene expression in non-epithelial tissues Detection with polymerase chain reaction. Am J Pathol. 1993;142:1111–1118. [PubMed]
  • van 't Veer LJ, Dai H, van de Vijver MJ, He YD, Hart AAM, Mao M, Peterse HL, van der Kooy K, Marton MJ, Witteveen AT, Schreiber GJ, Kerkhoven RM, Roberts C, Linsley PS, Bernards R, Friend SH. Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature. 2002;415:530–536. [PubMed]
  • Zippelius A, Kufer P, Honold G, Kollermann MW, Oberneder R, Schlimok G, Riethmuller G, Pantel K. Limitations of reverse-transcriptase – polymerase chain reaction analyses for detection of micrometastatic epithelial cancer cells in bone marrow. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:2701–2708. [PubMed]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK