In this study, we showed that an orally available SOD, named oxykine, inhibited inflammation-promoted acquisition of metastatic phenotype of weakly tumorigenic and nonmetastatic murine fibrosarcoma cells without adverse side effect. We also observed suppression of the primary tumour growth by the oxykine treatment.
Several lines of evidence implicate a relationship between induction of SODs in tumour cells and reversion of neoplastic transformation or loss of the malignant phenotype including metastatic property. From these, it has been hypothesised that SOD can be a new tumour suppressor gene (
Sykes et al, 1978;
Bravard et al, 1992;
Safford et al, 1994). It is reported that unbalanced overexpression of SOD protein modulates cellular signal transduction cascades such as tumour –invasion-associated matrix metalloproteases through transactivation of transcription factor(s) (
Wenk et al, 1999;
Nelson et al, 2003). Manganese-superoxide dismutase is known to be particularly high in primary hepatoma (
Taniguchi, 1992), gastric cancer (
Taniguchi, 1992), acute myeloid and/or lymphocytic leukaemias (
Nishiura et al, 1992), epithelial-type ovarian cancer (
Ishikawa et al, 1990), central nervous system tumours (
Cobbs et al, 1996) and neuroblastoma (
Kawamura et al, 1992); on the other hand, lower SOD levels have generally been demonstrated in other tumour cells and clinical tumour tissues (
Oberley and Buettner, 1979;
Loven et al, 1984;
Oberley and Oberley, 1988;
Brorrello et al, 1993).
To date, eight different techniques have been established to elevate SOD levels in tumour cells or tumour tissues. All the techniques have been reported to reverse malignant phenotypes of tumour cells. They are (i) intravenous or subcutaneous administration of recombinant human SOD which substitutes specific amino acid for stable one (
Yoshizaki et al, 1994); (ii) intravenous administration of SOD conjugated with a pyran copolymer, for prolongation of its activity (
Oda et al, 1989); (iii) addition of exogenous liposomal SOD (
Beckman et al, 1988); (iv) intraperiponeal or subcutaneous administration of a selective SOD mimetic molecule of nonpeptidic and low molecular weight (
Samlowski et al, 2003); (v) elevation of SOD level by sense cDNA transfection (
Safford et al, 1994); (vi) inoculation of fibroblasts that are genetically modified to secrete SOD (
Tanaka et al, 2001); (vii) elevation of SOD levels by exposure to a superoxide generator and subsequent isolation of superoxide-resistant cells (
Fernandez-Pol et al, 1982); (viii) secondary induction of SOD in tumour tissues by administration of an immunopotentiator which stimulates immune cells to produce SOD-inducible cytokines such as interferon-gamma and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (
Habelhah et al, 1998). There is no doubt that an orally available SOD would be worth developing for preclinical use of SOD. However, in an experiment using mice, only a small portion (approximately 10%) of orally administered SOD is absorbed through gastrointestinal tract (
Giri and Misra, 1984), and most of it was digested, similarly to other proteins, before being absorbed into the blood stream. As a solution of this problem, SOD has been coated with a protective vegetal prolamine (wheat gliadin) layer that not only prevents gastric digestion (
Vouldoukis et al, 2003) but also promotes the delivery of the bioactive molecule in the mucosa of small intestine (
Clemente et al, 2003). In this study, we used cantaloupe melon (
Cucumis melo LC. Cucurbitaceae)-derived SOD. The
C. melo LC. derived SOD has an SOD activity which is more than five times that of classical melon species, charentais (
Vouldoukis et al, 2004). In fact, melon, barley plant, broccoli, Brussels sprouts, cabbage, wheat grass and most green plants which we have in daily meals naturally contain large amounts of SOD.
Kitagawa et al (1986,
1991) reported that X-ray crystallography of plant SOD showed a high structural homology to the mammalian SOD, indicating common characteristics beyond the species barrier such as enzymatic activity (
Taniguchi, 1992).
Niitsu and his colleagues have discovered an inhibitory effect of SOD on both experimental and spontaneous pulmonary metastasis in murine models (
Yoshizaki et al, 1994). They intensively investigated the mechanisms and reported that SOD dramatically suppressed motility and invasion of both human and murine tumour cells (
Yoshizaki et al, 1994;
Muramatsu et al, 1995). A similar suppressive effect of SOD on tumour metastasis was observed in the studies of exogenous and endogenous SOD treatments (
Kwee et al, 1991) and of SOD cDNA transfection (
Safford et al, 1994). Besides the direct inhibitory effect of SOD on motile phenotype of tumour cells, our present study revealed reduced acquisition of metastatic phenotype in the process of tumour development. We can conclude that the effect we observed was specific to the metastatic ability itself of tumour cells, because we used the culture cell lines established for the evaluation of metastatic ability and the culture condition excluded contamination of oxykine or inflammatory cells. As indicated by
in situ superoxide production levels in each treatment in , we believe that the oxykine administration dismutates superoxides which are produced mainly by gelatine sponge-elicited inflammatory cells and are known as a genotoxic substance to induce gene alterations. From these, we speculate that oxykine may prevent metastasis-associated gene alteration(s) caused by ROS produced by inflammatory cells.
We also observed inhibition of the primary tumour growth in the group with oxykine administration. There are three possible explanations for this. One is that the elevated levels of SOD might lower intracellular levels of O
2−, which in tern downmodulates signal transduction and/or activation of transcription factors to suppress cell growth (
Burdon, 1995).
Irani et al (1997) have recently shown that superoxide acts especially as signal regulator for the stimulation of cell growth through a flavoprotein and Rac1 pathways. Second is that SOD might stimulate tumoricidal immune effector cells.
Samlowski et al (2003) demonstrated that administration of SOD mimetic nonpeptidic molecule enhanced the cytotoxicity of lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells
in vivo. Indeed, the QR-32 tumour cells are highly sensitive to LAK cells (
Okada et al, 1994). Third is that oxykine might stimulate immune cells to produce SOD-inducible cytokines and growth factors. Those factors would coordinately synthesise
de novo SOD at the tumour-growing sites. In our experiments, we revealed that Mn-SOD was induced in tumour cells only by oxykine formulation (). However, a single component of the oxykine by itself, that is, gliadin alone or SOD alone, does not have ability to induce SOD. At this time, we do not know the precise mechanisms responsible for this, but speculate that the oxykine formulation possibly activates the host immune system besides exerting direct SOD action. Since the main compound of melon-derived SOD induces Th1-dependent immunity (
Vouldoukis et al, 2003), and the compound covered with gliadin has been identified as a major allergen for wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (
Matsuo et al, 2005), both components seem to be immunogenic to host. Furthermore, only the oral administration was effective on the induction of SOD and suppression of the tumour progression phenotype (). Therefore, immunopotentiating effects of orally administered oxykine maybe involved in augmentation of immune system of intestinal tract or whole body through absorption via gastrointestinal tract. We are currently undertaking a study to determine whether oxykine has a role in activation of immune functions.
The formation of human cancer involves a multistage process, that is, initiation, promotion and tumour progression. Oxidative stress is considered to contribute to the whole process from carcinogenesis through induction of mutations or upregulation of cell growth in target cells (
Okada, 2002). In this study, we showed inflammation-promoted tumour progression was prevented by administration of a SOD derivative, oxykine. Recent reports have verified that oxykine protects cells from hyperbaric oxygen-induced oxidative stress, that is, breaks of DNA strand in healthy volunteers (
Muth et al, 2004) and that oxykine prevents oxidative stress-mediated diabetic nephropathy in rodent model of type 2 diabetes (
Naito et al, 2005). This orally available molecule will be effective in clinical utilisation to prevent both tumour development and progression.