Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of bmjLink to Publisher's site
BMJ. 1996 August 17; 313(7054): 398–399.
PMCID: PMC2351819

Cigarette advertising and onset of smoking in children: questionnaire survey.


OBJECTIVE: To investigate uptake of smoking in a cohort of 11 to 12 year olds related to awareness of advertised cigarette brands named. DESIGN: Self completed questionnaires administered to whole classes of schoolchildren in June 1993 and June 1994. SETTING: Primary, middle, and secondary schools in the north and south of England. SUBJECTS: 1450 pupils aged 11 and 12 years at the time of the first survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Onset of smoking and brands smoked by the second survey related to cigarette brands named in the first one. Less advertised brands were used as the base for calculating odds ratios. RESULTS: Girls who named the most advertised brands-namely, Benson and Hedges alone (odds ratio = 2.50, 95% confidence interval = 1.18 to 5.30) or Benson and Hedges and Silk Cut (2.15, 1.04 to 4.42) in the first survey were at greatest risk of taking up smoking by the second one. The difference was similar but not significant for boys. Boys and girls who named the least advertised brands in the first survey were at no greater risk of taking up smoking by the second survey than those who named no brands (boys odds ratio = 0.49 (0.24 to 1.01); girls 0.79 (0.38 to 1.62)). New smokers were more likely to smoke any available brand (29.5%) or a less advertised brand such as Embassy (24.6%) than the most advertised ones, Benson and Hedges (19.7%) and Silk Cut (14.8%). Established smokers were more selective, only 15% smoking any available brand and 38.3% smoking Benson and Hedges. CONCLUSIONS: Cigarette advertising appears to increase children's awareness of smoking at a generic level and encourages them to take up the behaviour, beginning with any cigarettes which are available and affordable.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (406K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Hastings GB, Ryan H, Teer P, MacKintosh AM. Cigarette advertising and children's smoking: why Reg was withdrawn. BMJ. 1994 Oct 8;309(6959):933–937. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Charlton A, Blair V. Predicting the onset of smoking in boys and girls. Soc Sci Med. 1989;29(7):813–818. [PubMed]
  • Aitken PP, Eadie DR. Reinforcing effects of cigarette advertising on under-age smoking. Br J Addict. 1990 Mar;85(3):399–412. [PubMed]
  • Chapman S, Fitzgerald B. Brand preference and advertising recall in adolescent smokers: some implications for health promotion. Am J Public Health. 1982 May;72(5):491–494. [PubMed]
  • Goldstein AO, Fischer PM, Richards JW, Jr, Creten D. Relationship between high school student smoking and recognition of cigarette advertisements. J Pediatr. 1987 Mar;110(3):488–491. [PubMed]
  • McNeill AD, Jarvis MJ, West RJ. Brand preferences among schoolchildren who smoke. Lancet. 1985 Aug 3;2(8449):271–272. [PubMed]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group