Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of bmjThe BMJ
BMJ. 1996 July 6; 313(7048): 13–16.
PMCID: PMC2351462

Misdiagnosis of the vegetative state: retrospective study in a rehabilitation unit.


OBJECTIVE--To identify the number of patients who were misdiagnosed as being in the vegetative state and their characteristics. DESIGN--Retrospective study of the clinical records of the medical, occupational therapy, and clinical psychology departments. SETTING--20 bed unit specialising in the rehabilitation of patients with profound brain damage, including the vegetative state. SUBJECTS--40 patients admitted between 1992 and 1995 with a referral diagnosis of vegetative state. OUTCOME MEASURES--Patients who showed an ability to communicate consistently using eye pointing or a touch sensitive single switch buzzer. RESULTS--Of the 40 patients referred as being in the vegetative state, 17 (43%) were considered as having been misdiagnosed; seven of these had been presumed to be vegetative for longer than one year, including three for over four years. Most of the misdiagnosed patients were blind or severely visually impaired. All patients remained severely physically disabled, but nearly all were able to communicate their preference in quality of life issues-some to a high level. CONCLUSIONS--The vegetative state needs considerable skill to diagnose, requiring assessment over a period of time; diagnosis cannot be made, even by the most experienced clinician, from a bedside assessment. Accurate diagnosis is possible but requires the skills of a multidisciplinary team experienced in the management of people with complex disabilities. Recognition of awareness is essential if an optimal quality of life is to be achieved and to avoid inappropriate approaches to the courts for a declaration for withdrawal of tube feeding.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (868K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Jennett B, Plum F. Persistent vegetative state after brain damage. A syndrome in search of a name. Lancet. 1972 Apr 1;1(7753):734–737. [PubMed]
  • Jennett B, Dyer C. Persistent vegetative state and the right to die: the United States and Britain. BMJ. 1991 May 25;302(6787):1256–1258. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Childs NL, Mercer WN, Childs HW. Accuracy of diagnosis of persistent vegetative state. Neurology. 1993 Aug;43(8):1465–1467. [PubMed]
  • Tresch DD, Sims FH, Duthie EH, Goldstein MD, Lane PS. Clinical characteristics of patients in the persistent vegetative state. Arch Intern Med. 1991 May;151(5):930–932. [PubMed]
  • Andrews K. Recovery of patients after four months or more in the persistent vegetative state. BMJ. 1993 Jun 12;306(6892):1597–1600. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet. 1975 Mar 1;1(7905):480–484. [PubMed]

Articles from The BMJ are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group