Type III secretion is a common virulence mechanism among gram-negative pathogens. One of the hallmarks of type III secretion is that toxins are delivered vectorially into the host cell cytoplasm in a contact-dependent manner. While elegant experiments with
Salmonella have demonstrated that triggering of secretion is a very rapid process (
60), the precise order of steps involved or, indeed, the involvement of host factors in controlling type III secretion is poorly understood.
Here we present data that support a model for cell contact-mediated triggering of effector secretion by
P. aeruginosa (Fig. ). We have presented data that secretion of translocator proteins (PopB, PopD, and PcrV) proceeds even in the presence of calcium. Cell contact, therefore, rather than triggering secretion per se, results in a switch in the secretion specificity, allowing secretion of effector class proteins (ExoS, ExoT, ExoY, PopN, and ExsE). While the data presented suggest that secretion of translocators is calcium independent, a closer look at the data, in particular for the deregulated
exsE mutant (see Fig. S3 in the supplemental material), suggests that secretion of translocators may be more efficient in the absence of calcium. There could be several explanations for this observation. For one, it is known that removing calcium from the medium stimulates cyclic AMP production, which in turn up-regulates type III secretion gene expression (
74). In other words, even though the
exsE mutant is deregulated, it may still receive a slight boost in expression by the cyclic AMP/Vfr pathway when grown in the absence of calcium. Consistent with this observation,
exoS expression is slightly increased when
P. aeruginosa is grown in the absence of calcium, even when
exsE is deleted (
55,
68). Alternatively, degradation of secreted protein by a chelator-sensitive protease could account for the apparent reduction of secreted PopB. An interesting third possibility is that the rate of secretion increases when effector secretion is triggered. There is some evidence to support this hypothesis, since the activity of the translocation ATPase in
Yersinia, YscN (PscN in
P. aeruginosa), is negatively regulated by the associated protein YscL (PscL) (
5). YscL is required for type III secretion, and its level has to be carefully controlled since overexpression also negatively affects secretion (
5). Interestingly, a 5-amino-acid deletion of the flagellar YscL homolog, FliH, was found to stimulate the ATPase activity of the flagellar ATPase, FliI, raising the possibility that YscN (PscN) ATPase activity could be activated as well as repressed (
26).
These data also suggest that the current model of how YopN controls effector secretion in the closely related
Yersinia T3SS may not apply to
P. aeruginosa. A
yopN mutant, just like a
P. aeruginosa popN mutant, secretes effectors constitutively (
13,
54,
64). It was proposed that YopN enters the secretion channel and blocks it by virtue of its C-terminal interaction with TyeA, which in turn is bound to a yet-to-be-identified component of the secretion machinery (
19). Here we demonstrated that translocators are clearly secreted under conditions where secretion of PopN (the
P. aeruginosa YopN homolog) is shut down, suggesting that PopN cannot be blocking the secretion channel (Fig. ). This is likely also the case for
Yersinia, since the proposed model is also not consistent with the finding that translocators but not effectors are secreted into the culture supernatant by
Yersinia infecting tissue culture cells (
34,
58). A simple model to explain these results would be that the PopN-Pcr1-Pcr2-PscB complex (YopN-TyeA-SycN-YscB in
Yersinia spp.) occludes a component of the type III secretion machinery that allows access of effector-chaperone complexes to the secretion ATPase, while translocator-chaperone complexes gain access via a different route. Consistent with this hypothesis, it was recently demonstrated that certain
yscU mutants fail to secrete translocators while retaining the ability to secrete effectors (
62). Our assay to reestablish calcium control of secretion is a simple method to discriminate proteins secreted as “translocator” and “effector” class secretion substrates. It will be interesting to determine the molecular basis of the signals that allow the T3SS to differentially recognize translocators and effectors. In this context, it is tempting to speculate that the cognate chaperones may be involved in targeting translocators for secretion, since translocator and effector class chaperones differ structurally (
48).
It was recently demonstrated that PopD is required for triggering of T3SS gene expression on cell contact (
67). We have found that the switch to effector class secretion requires a functional translocation pore. Mutants lacking PopB or PopD fail to induce
exoS expression on cell contact (which relies on the secretion of ExsE [
55,
67,
68]). Our findings imply that the PcrV-dependent insertion of PopD into the host cell plasma membrane itself cannot be the signal for triggering effector secretion, since PopD is still inserted in a
popB mutant (
28). As has been demonstrated for YopB in the case of
Yersinia (
58), neither
popB nor
popD mutants can be cross-complemented, arguing that insertion of the translocators has to occur in close proximity to the secretion needle. This is consistent with the previous finding that insertion of PopD requires the needle tip protein PcrV (
27,
28). The simplest model for secretion control, therefore, is that after attachment to the cell, when the needle tip is brought into close proximity to the host cell, the translocators are inserted into the plasma membrane, forming the translocation pore. A yet-unknown host factor acts at the stage of either translocator insertion, docking of the needle to the translocation pore, or stabilization of the translocase. In our estimation the latter two possibilities are more likely, since PopB and PopD can form pores in model membranes in the absence of other cofactors (
17). Interestingly, PcrV cannot bind to these pores (
61). This could of course also be due to an inherently weak affinity of PcrV for the translocation pore, requiring either other cofactors or multiple simultaneous interactions as found in the assembled needle tip. The needle tip most likely harbors multiple PcrV molecules (
8) that can interact with the translocation pore (purified PcrV, on the other hand, is a monomer [
16]). We propose that it is docking of the needle tip to the translocation pore that results in a conformational change in PcrV, which is propagated down the needle and results in the activation of effector secretion. In this context, it should be noted that it has been proposed that removing calcium from the medium in vitro results in triggering effector secretion by causing a conformational change in the needle (
66). It is therefore easy to envision how removing calcium from the needle in vitro essentially bypasses the need for a host-derived signal, which would originate at the assembled translocation apparatus, by switching the organization of the needle to a conformation that signals effector secretion.
Our findings are analogous to data from the
Yersinia system, where it was found that translocation of effector proteins can be modulated by the action of the effector protein YopE (
2). The amino-terminal portion of ExoS and ExoT (comprising the secretion signal, chaperone binding site, membrane localization domain, and Rho-GAP domain) are homologous to YopE. Interestingly, ExoS and ExoT can substitute for YopE with regard to control of effector translocation, suggesting that these two instances of translocation control are related (
1). There are some differences between these systems, however, since a second protein, YopK, which has no homolog in
P. aeruginosa, also contributes to translocation control in
Yersinia. In our hands, both the Rho-GAP activity of ExoS and the ADP-ribosylation activity can serve to control effector translocation. This observation could be interpreted to mean that the signaling pathways affected by either activity of ExoS converge to control the activity of the host factor required for triggering effector secretion on cell contact. Alternatively, either activity could affect a separate process, both of which are required for the host factor to be active (e.g., down-regulating a step in phosphoplipid biogenesis and affecting phospholipid trafficking, either of which results in a change in plasma membrane phospholipid composition). Clearly, a better understanding of the nature of the host factor will be required to understand the role of ExoS in controlling the “effector switch.”
The observation that either activity can control the switch to effector secretion is in contrast to the case for
Yersinia, where only the Rho-GAP domain of ExoS was able to control effector translocation when expressed in a
yopE null mutant. This discrepancy is perhaps due to differences in the cells used in these experiments (HeLa versus A549 cells). In the case of
Yersinia, it has been suggested that injection of YopE generates a negative signal that shuts down effector translocation (
1). Our results are more consistent with the interpretation that the switch to effector secretion requires a preexisting host factor, which is inactivated by ExoS. Permeabilization of cells with either streptolysin O or alpha-hemolysin, two pore-forming toxins with differing pore sizes and membrane requirements, abolishes triggering of effector secretion. Since these toxins kill the cell and allow release of small metabolites and nucleotides, it is unlikely that activation of a signaling cascade is responsible for the lack of
exoS induction in this case. It has been described for both the
Yersinia and
P. aeruginosa systems that type III secretion can display target cell specificity (
39,
42,
57). The absence of a cellular function required for activation of effector secretion offers a simple explanation for this phenomenon.
The nature of the signal or cellular function required for triggering of effector secretion is unclear. It has been proposed that the signal for triggering type III secretion is in fact the low-calcium environment of the host cell cytosol, which could conceivably be sensed once the translocation pore has formed and docked to the needle (
35). Raising the intracellular calcium pool by using the ionophore calcimycin, however, had no effect on the ability of
P. aeruginosa to induce
exoS expression, suggesting that calcium plays no role in triggering of effector secretion on cell contact. In the
Yersinia system YopE was demonstrated to prevent accumulation of actin at the site of bacterial attachment. In a
yopE mutant, accumulation of actin was correlated with an increase in pore formation, and it was hypothesized that localized membrane ruffling resulted in the translocation pore being jarred loose from the needle (
72). Accumulation of actin, however, is apparently not involved in controlling effector secretion, since addition of cytochalasin D did not prevent triggering of
exoS expression.
Clearly, determining the molecular basis of triggering of effector secretion on cell contact will add an important facet to our understanding of type III secretion. As mentioned above, controlling the switch to effector secretion may underlie the observed target cell specificity. It is easy to imagine how being able to target specific cell types, or perhaps more importantly to avoid injecting toxins into innocuous cells, can help shape the course of an infection. A clearer understanding of the molecular principles governing the specificity of effector secretion on cell contact will allow us to design experiments to directly test its role in infection.