Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of jcellbiolHomeThe Rockefeller University PressEditorsContactInstructions for AuthorsThis issue
J Cell Biol. 1992 March 1; 116(5): 1167–1180.
PMCID: PMC2289365

Meiotic spindle assembly in Drosophila females: behavior of nonexchange chromosomes and the effects of mutations in the nod kinesin-like protein


Mature Drosophila oocytes are arrested in metaphase of the first meiotic division. We have examined microtubule and chromatin reorganization as the meiosis I spindle assembles on maturation using indirect immunofluorescence and laser scanning confocal microscopy. The results suggest that chromatin captures or nucleates microtubules, and that these subsequently form a highly tapered spindle in which the majority of microtubules do not terminate at the poles. Nonexchange homologs separate from each other and move toward opposite poles during spindle assembly. By the time of metaphase arrest, these chromosomes are positioned on opposite half spindles, between the metaphase plate and the spindle poles, with the large nonexchange X chromosomes always closer to the metaphase plate than the smaller nonexchange fourth chromosomes. Nonexchange homologs are therefore oriented on the spindle in the absence of a direct physical linkage, and the spindle position of these chromosomes appears to be determined by size. Loss-of-function mutations at the nod locus, which encodes a kinesin-like protein, cause meiotic loss and nondisjunction of nonexchange chromosomes, but have little or no effect on exchange chromosome segregation. In oocytes lacking functional nod protein, most of the nonexchange chromosomes are ejected from the main chromosomal mass shortly after the nuclear envelope breaks down and microtubules interact with the chromatin. In addition, the nonexchange chromosomes that are associated with spindles in nod/nod oocytes show excessive poleward migration. Based on these observations, and the structural similarity of the nod protein and kinesin, we propose that nonexchange chromosomes are maintained on the half spindle by opposing poleward and anti-poleward forces, and that the nod protein provides the anti-poleward force.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.7M).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Ault JG. Stable versus unstable orientations of sex chromosomes in two grasshopper species. Chromosoma. 1986;93(4):298–304. [PubMed]
  • Bajer AS. Functional autonomy of monopolar spindle and evidence for oscillatory movement in mitosis. J Cell Biol. 1982 Apr;93(1):33–48. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Blose SH, Meltzer DI, Feramisco JR. 10-nm filaments are induced to collapse in living cells microinjected with monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies against tubulin. J Cell Biol. 1984 Mar;98(3):847–858. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Carpenter AT. Distributive segregation: motors in the polar wind? Cell. 1991 Mar 8;64(5):885–890. [PubMed]
  • Baker BS, Carpenter AT, Ripoll P. The Utilization during Mitotic Cell Division of Loci Controlling Meiotic Recombination and Disjunction in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Genetics. 1978 Nov;90(3):531–578. [PubMed]
  • Church K, Nicklas RB, Lin HP. Micromanipulated bivalents can trigger mini-spindle formation in Drosophila melanogaster spermatocyte cytoplasm. J Cell Biol. 1986 Dec;103(6 Pt 2):2765–2773. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Cooper KW. A New Theory of Secondary Non-Disjunction in Female Drosophila Melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1948 May;34(5):179–187. [PubMed]
  • Hawley RS. Genetic and molecular analysis of a simple disjunctional system in Drosophila melanogaster. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1989;311:277–302. [PubMed]
  • Hirokawa N, Sato-Yoshitake R, Kobayashi N, Pfister KK, Bloom GS, Brady ST. Kinesin associates with anterogradely transported membranous organelles in vivo. J Cell Biol. 1991 Jul;114(2):295–302. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hughes-Schrader S. Distance segregation and compound sex chromosomes in mantispids (Neuroptera:Mantispidae). Chromosoma. 1969;27(2):109–129. [PubMed]
  • Karr TL, Alberts BM. Organization of the cytoskeleton in early Drosophila embryos. J Cell Biol. 1986 Apr;102(4):1494–1509. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kellogg DR, Field CM, Alberts BM. Identification of microtubule-associated proteins in the centrosome, spindle, and kinetochore of the early Drosophila embryo. J Cell Biol. 1989 Dec;109(6 Pt 1):2977–2991. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kimble M, Church K. Meiosis and early cleavage in Drosophila melanogaster eggs: effects of the claret-non-disjunctional mutation. J Cell Sci. 1983 Jul;62:301–318. [PubMed]
  • Lindsley DL, Sandler L. The Meiotic Behavior of Grossly Deleted X Chromosomes in Drosophila Melanogaster. Genetics. 1958 May;43(3):547–563. [PubMed]
  • Mahowald AP, Goralski TJ, Caulton JH. In vitro activation of Drosophila eggs. Dev Biol. 1983 Aug;98(2):437–445. [PubMed]
  • Mazia D, Paweletz N, Sluder G, Finze EM. Cooperation of kinetochores and pole in the establishment of monopolar mitotic apparatus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Jan;78(1):377–381. [PubMed]
  • McIntosh JR, McDonald KL. The mitotic spindle. Sci Am. 1989 Oct;261(4):48–56. [PubMed]
  • Mitchison TJ. Mitosis: basic concepts. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1989 Feb;1(1):67–74. [PubMed]
  • Nicklas RB. Chromosome micromanipulation. II. Induced reorientation and the experimental control of segregation in meiosis. Chromosoma. 1967;21(1):17–50. [PubMed]
  • Nicklas RB. Chromosome segregation mechanisms. Genetics. 1974 Sep;78(1):205–213. [PubMed]
  • Nicklas RB. The motor for poleward chromosome movement in anaphase is in or near the kinetochore. J Cell Biol. 1989 Nov;109(5):2245–2255. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Nicklas RB, Staehly CA. Chromosome micromanipulation. I. The mechanics of chromosome attachment to the spindle. Chromosoma. 1967;21(1):1–16. [PubMed]
  • Nicklas RB, Koch CA. Chromosome micromanipulation. 3. Spindle fiber tension and the reorientation of mal-oriented chromosomes. J Cell Biol. 1969 Oct;43(1):40–50. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Novitski E. The relation of exchange to nondisjunction in heterologous chromosome pairs in the Drosophila female. Genetics. 1978 Mar;88(3):499–503. [PubMed]
  • Oakley BR, Oakley CE, Yoon Y, Jung MK. Gamma-tubulin is a component of the spindle pole body that is essential for microtubule function in Aspergillus nidulans. Cell. 1990 Jun 29;61(7):1289–1301. [PubMed]
  • Puro J. Differential mechanisms governing segregation of a univalent in oocytes and spermatocytes of Drosophila melanogaster. Chromosoma. 1991 Jun;100(5):305–314. [PubMed]
  • Rieder CL, Davison EA, Jensen LC, Cassimeris L, Salmon ED. Oscillatory movements of monooriented chromosomes and their position relative to the spindle pole result from the ejection properties of the aster and half-spindle. J Cell Biol. 1986 Aug;103(2):581–591. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Sawada T, Schatten G. Microtubules in ascidian eggs during meiosis, fertilization, and mitosis. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1988;9(3):219–230. [PubMed]
  • Saxton WM, Hicks J, Goldstein LS, Raff EC. Kinesin heavy chain is essential for viability and neuromuscular functions in Drosophila, but mutants show no defects in mitosis. Cell. 1991 Mar 22;64(6):1093–1102. [PubMed]
  • Staiger CJ, Cande WZ. Microtubule distribution in dv, a maize meiotic mutant defective in the prophase to metaphase transition. Dev Biol. 1990 Mar;138(1):231–242. [PubMed]
  • Vale RD, Reese TS, Sheetz MP. Identification of a novel force-generating protein, kinesin, involved in microtubule-based motility. Cell. 1985 Aug;42(1):39–50. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • White JG, Amos WB, Fordham M. An evaluation of confocal versus conventional imaging of biological structures by fluorescence light microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1987 Jul;105(1):41–48. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Wright TR. A cold-sensitive zygotic lethal causing high frequencies of nondisjunction during meiosis I in Drosophila melanogaster females. Genetics. 1974 Mar;76(3):511–536. [PubMed]
  • Zhang P, Knowles BA, Goldstein LS, Hawley RS. A kinesin-like protein required for distributive chromosome segregation in Drosophila. Cell. 1990 Sep 21;62(6):1053–1062. [PubMed]
  • Zhang P, Hawley RS. The genetic analysis of distributive segregation in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Further genetic analysis of the nod locus. Genetics. 1990 May;125(1):115–127. [PubMed]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press