A
2A receptor activation is now considered as one of the most potent, endogenous, anti-inflammatory signals in the body. The adenosine-A
2A anti-inflammatory axis is used as an endogenous means to control ischemia and inflammation-induced tissue injury, and attempts are being made to translate this anti-inflammatory mechanism to the clinical scenario. A
2A receptor agonists thus have high potential in treating ischemia and immune/inflammation-induced tissue injury in a wide variety of diseases, ranging from acute myocardial infarction to Crohn’s disease (). In fact, an A
2A receptor agonist, MRE-0094, is in clinical trials for chronic, neuropathic, and diabetic foot ulcers, owing to the anti-inflammatory and wound-healing effects of A
2A receptor stimulation [
110]. Clinical trials with ATL146e as an anti-inflammatory compound have also been initiated [
111].
| TABLE 1Effects of A2A Receptor Ligands in Animal Models of Disease |
There are several potential toxic effects that should be considered when testing A
2A receptor agonists as a therapeutic option to treat inflammatory and ischemic disease. For example, A
2A receptor agonists have been shown to adversely influence blood pressure, which is especially true for the widely used agonist CGS21680 [
76]. Given the relatively moderate selectivity of CGS21680 toward A
2A when compared with A
1 receptors [
22], it is possible that A
1 receptors contribute to the adverse cardiovascular effect of this agent by directly impairing heart function [
1,
2]. In addition, CGS21680 can cause vasodilation in some vascular beds in a NO- and K
ATP channel-dependent manner, and this vasodilation may also contribute to alterations in blood pressure [
112]. Recently developed and more selective A
2A agonists, such as ATL146e, however, have the advantage of not decreasing blood pressure in rodents and larger mammals at doses that are fully effective inhibitors of inflammation [
5]. A further potential issue with A
2A agonists stems from the fact that certain G protein-coupled receptors are down-regulated following prolonged administration of the agonist, preventing long-term efficacy [
1,
2]. Such effects, however, have not been observed so far with in vivo administration of A
2A agonists, as exemplified by the effectiveness of A
2A agonists in chronic models of inflammation ().
Alternatively, when there is need to provoke immune/inflammatory responses to rid the body of infections, as for example, in the immune-suppressed phase of sepsis, A
2A antagonists might be useful in enhancing the immune system’s ability to fight and defeat invading pathogens (). In addition, the A
2A antagonist might be useful in treating ischemic events in the brain, based on the observation that activation of A
2A receptors on immune cells is responsible for mediating the deleterious effects of A
2A agonism in stroke [
103]. Potential side-effects with the A
2A receptor antagonist might include increased blood pressure and inflammation; however, based on the results of recent trials with A
2A antagonists to treat patients with Parkinson’s disease, A
2A antagonists seem to be well-tolerated and devoid of side-effects [
113,
114].
Taken together, despite some challenges that remain, optimism is currently high that A2A receptor ligands will have a place in the treatment of many inflammatory diseases.