PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of mlabJournal informationSubscribeSubmissions on the Publisher web siteCurrent issue of BMLA in PMCAlso see JMLA journal in PMC
 
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1992 July; 80(3): 219–222.
PMCID: PMC225660

Meta-analysis: a tool for medical and scientific discoveries.

Abstract

Medicine has made increasing use of meta-analysis, largely as a quantitative procedure for combining results of clinical trials. Meta-analysis begins with a comprehensive review of the literature. The next step is a systematic analysis of the quality and content of each study. Finally, results are combined statistically and conclusions are drawn from this new overview of the data. This paper presents a brief historical perspective on the use of meta-analysis in medicine with emphasis on the medical library. The authors conclude that in the future, medical librarians will play a significant role in the application of this useful technique.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (717K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Landman JT, Dawes RM. Psychotherapy outcome. Smith and Glass' conclusions stand up under scrutiny. Am Psychol. 1982 May;37(5):504–516. [PubMed]
  • Smith ML, Glass GV. Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies. Am Psychol. 1977 Sep;32(9):752–760. [PubMed]
  • Fiske DW. The meta-analytic revolution in outcome research. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983 Feb;51(1):65–70. [PubMed]
  • O'Flynn AI. Meta-analysis. Nurs Res. 1982 Sep-Oct;31(5):314–316. [PubMed]
  • Yusuf S, Collins R, Peto R, Furberg C, Stampfer MJ, Goldhaber SZ, Hennekens CH. Intravenous and intracoronary fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction: overview of results on mortality, reinfarction and side-effects from 33 randomized controlled trials. Eur Heart J. 1985 Jul;6(7):556–585. [PubMed]
  • Yusuf S, Peto R, Lewis J, Collins R, Sleight P. Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: an overview of the randomized trials. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1985 Mar-Apr;27(5):335–371. [PubMed]
  • Louis TA, Fineberg HV, Mosteller F. Findings for public health from meta-analyses. Annu Rev Public Health. 1985;6:1–20. [PubMed]
  • Curlette WL, Cannella KS. Going beyond the narrative summarization of research findings: the meta-analysis approach. Res Nurs Health. 1985 Sep;8(3):293–301. [PubMed]
  • Chalmers TC, Berrier J, Sacks HS, Levin H, Reitman D, Nagalingam R. Meta-analysis of clinical trials as a scientific discipline. II: Replicate variability and comparison of studies that agree and disagree. Stat Med. 1987 Oct-Nov;6(7):733–744. [PubMed]
  • Chalmers TC, Levin H, Sacks HS, Reitman D, Berrier J, Nagalingam R. Meta-analysis of clinical trials as a scientific discipline. I: Control of bias and comparison with large co-operative trials. Stat Med. 1987 Apr-May;6(3):315–328. [PubMed]
  • Chalmers TC, Smith H, Jr, Blackburn B, Silverman B, Schroeder B, Reitman D, Ambroz A. A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial. Control Clin Trials. 1981 May;2(1):31–49. [PubMed]
  • Klatskin G, Kimberg DV. Recurrent hepatitis attributable to halothane sensitization in an anesthetist. N Engl J Med. 1969 Mar 6;280(10):515–522. [PubMed]
  • Trowell J, Peto R, Smith AC. Controlled trial of repeated halothane anaesthetics in patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with radium. Lancet. 1975 Apr 12;1(7911):821–824. [PubMed]
  • Wright R, Eade OE, Chisholm M, Hawksley M, Lloyd B, Moles TM, Edwards JC, GArdner MJ. Controlled prospective study of the effect on liver function of multiple exposures to halothane. Lancet. 1975 Apr 12;1(7911):817–820. [PubMed]
  • Lam W, Sze PC, Sacks HS, Chalmers TC. Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of nicotine chewing-gum. Lancet. 1987 Jul 4;2(8549):27–30. [PubMed]
  • Ellenberg SS. Meta-analysis: the quantitative approach to research review. Semin Oncol. 1988 Oct;15(5):472–481. [PubMed]
  • Jenicek M. Meta-analysis in medicine. Where we are and where we want to go. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(1):35–44. [PubMed]
  • Wachter KW. Disturbed by meta-analysis? Science. 1988 Sep 16;241(4872):1407–1408. [PubMed]
  • Lynn MR. Meta-analysis: appropriate tool for the integration of nursing research? Nurs Res. 1989 Sep-Oct;38(5):302–305. [PubMed]
  • Smith MC, Stullenbarger E. Meta-analysis: an overview. Nurs Sci Q. 1989 Fall;2(3):114–115. [PubMed]
  • Teagarden JR. Meta-analysis: whither narrative review? Pharmacotherapy. 1989;9(5):274–284. [PubMed]
  • Naylor CD. Two cheers for meta-analysis: problems and opportunities in aggregating results of clinical trials. CMAJ. 1988 May 15;138(10):891–895. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Thacker SB. Meta-analysis. A quantitative approach to research integration. JAMA. 1988 Mar 18;259(11):1685–1689. [PubMed]
  • O'Rourke K, Detsky AS. Meta-analysis in medical research: strong encouragement for higher quality in individual research efforts. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(10):1021–1024. [PubMed]
  • GARFIELD E. Citation indexes for science; a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science. 1955 Jul 15;122(3159):108–111. [PubMed]
  • Swanson DR. Medical literature as a potential source of new knowledge. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1990 Jan;78(1):29–37. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Bulletin of the Medical Library Association are provided here courtesy of Medical Library Association