Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of epidinfectJournal HomepageSubscribeSumbitJournal Homepage
Epidemiol Infect. 1989 December; 103(3): 465–474.
PMCID: PMC2249543

The effect of pre-enrichment on recovery of Streptococcus agalactiae, Staphylococcus aureus and mycoplasma from bovine milk.


The study was conducted to determine whether pre-enrichment would increase sensitivity of detecting Streptococcus (Str.) agalactiae, Staphylococcus (S.) aureus, and mycoplasma in bovine milk. Two procedures were followed, one involving direct inoculation of milk on bovine blood agar, and the other involving preenrichment in broth followed by inoculation on agar. Logistic regression was used to predict the probability of isolation as a function of culture procedure and two additional covariates, the California Mastitis Test (CMT) score of the milk and the type of sample (indicating sample storage temperature and herd mastitis status). A total of 13778 milk samples was cultured for each of the three bacteria. By using results of both direct inoculation and pre-enrichment, the probability of isolation compared to use of direct inoculation only and adjusted for effects of other variables was increased 3.6-fold for Str. agalactiae, 1.6-fold for S. aureus and 1.7-fold for mycoplasma. The probability of isolation for all three bacteria increased as the CMT score increased. For Str. agalactiae, there was a statistical interaction predicting that enrichment improved the odds of isolation more from milk with high CMT scores than from milk with low scores. Results indicate that pre-enrichment can substantially increase the sensitivity of bacteriological screening of dairy cows for mastitis caused by Str. agalactiae, S. aureus, and mycoplasma.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.1M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Bushnell RB. Herd health approach to mastitis control and milk quality. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1980 Apr 15;176(8):746–750. [PubMed]
  • Bushnell RB. The importance of hygienic procedures in controlling mastitis. Vet Clin North Am Large Anim Pract. 1984 Jul;6(2):361–370. [PubMed]
  • Blowey RW. Mastitis monitoring in general practice. Vet Rec. 1984 Mar 17;114(11):259–261. [PubMed]
  • Neave FK, Dodd FH, Kingwill RG, Westgarth DR. Control of mastitis in the dairy herd by hygiene and management. J Dairy Sci. 1969 May;52(5):696–707. [PubMed]
  • Jasper DE, Jain NC, Brazil LH. Clinical and laboratory observations on bovine mastitis due to Mycoplasma. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1966 May 1;148(9):1017–1029. [PubMed]
  • Bennett RH, Jasper DE. Immunosuppression of humoral and cell-mediated responses in calves associated wtih inoculation of Mycoplasma bovis. Am J Vet Res. 1977 Nov;38(11):1731–1738. [PubMed]
  • Jasper DE. Bovine mycoplasmal mastitis. Adv Vet Sci Comp Med. 1981;25:121–157. [PubMed]
  • Thurmond MC, Holmberg CA, Luiz DM. Evaluation of a digitonin disk assay to discriminate between acholeplasma and mycoplasma isolates from bovine milk. Cornell Vet. 1989 Jan;79(1):71–81. [PubMed]
  • SCHALM OW, NOORLANDER DO. Experiments and observations leading to development of the California mastitis test. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1957 Mar 1;130(5):199–204. [PubMed]
  • Raccach M, Rottem S, Razin S. Survival of frozen mycoplasmas. Appl Microbiol. 1975 Aug;30(2):167–171. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Jasper DE, Dellinger JD, Rollins MH, Hakanson HD. Prevalence of mycoplasmal bovine mastitis in California. Am J Vet Res. 1979 Jul;40(7):1043–1047. [PubMed]

Articles from Epidemiology and Infection are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press