PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Diabet Med. Author manuscript; available in PMC Feb 11, 2008.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2238719
NIHMSID: NIHMS39103
Alcohol consumption is inversely associated with adherence to diabetes self-care behaviours
A. T. Ahmed, A. J. Karter, and J. Liu
Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, CA, USA
Correspondence to: Ameena T. Ahmed MD MPH, Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94612, USA. E-mail: Ameena.T.Ahmed/at/kp.org
Aims
Our aim was to examine the associations of alcohol consumption with six diabetes self-care behaviours.
Methods
We determined levels of alcohol consumption and examined associations between alcohol consumption and six self-care behaviours in 65 996 adults with diabetes who received care through Kaiser Permanente Northern California and who responded to a 1994−1997 survey. Adherence with recommendations for self monitoring of blood glucose, HbA1c testing, and diabetes medications were determined from electronic records; smoking and use of diet and exercise to treat diabetes were self reported. Multiple logistic regression models were used to determine the associations between alcohol consumption (average number of drinks/day in the past year) and the probability of adherence to each self-care behaviour.
Results
Current alcohol consumption was reported by 50.8% of adults with diabetes. In adjusted models, we observed a gradient of increasing risk for poor adherence to diabetes self-care behaviours with increasing alcohol consumption, starting with those who consume even one drink a day. Former drinkers had the greatest compliance with each self-care behaviour, except for current smoking.
Conclusions
Alcohol consumption is a marker for poorer adherence to diabetes self-care behaviours. These findings highlight the importance of routine assessment of alcohol intake in people with diabetes, particularly as half of adults with diabetes consume alcohol. Given extant evidence that moderate alcohol intake may have cardiovascular benefits for patients with diabetes, examination of the trade-offs between cardiovascular benefits vs. potential risk of lower adherence with self-care behaviours deserves study.
Keywords: adherence, alcohol, blood glucose, diet, exercise
Diabetes is a significant and growing health problem worldwide. In the USA, the prevalence of diabetes is 7%, and this figure continues to grow in parallel with the prevalence of obesity [1]. Diabetes is a strong risk factor for cardiovascular disease and end-stage renal disease, is the most common cause of blindness among working-age adults, and is responsible for half of non-traumatic lower extremity amputations in the USA [28]. In 2002, per capita medical expenditures for people with diabetes in the USA were $13 243, compared with $2560 for persons without diabetes and total direct medical expenditures exceeded $91 billion [9].
Self-care behaviours are considered a cornerstone of diabetes care, and are important determinants of diabetes disease course. Appointment keeping [10], self monitoring of blood glucose [10,11], exercise [12,13], diet [13,14], and adherence to medication regimen [15,16] have all been shown to be associated with better glycaemic control, as measured by HbA1c, an important predictor of diabetes complications [1721].
While half of all people aged 12 years or older in the USA currently consume alcohol [22], little is known about the patterns of alcohol use among people with diabetes, or how alcohol use is related to diabetes self-care behaviours. The prevalence of alcohol abuse and dependence in the general US population were 4.7 and 3.8%, respectively, in 2001−2002 [23]. It is unknown whether people with diabetes have a similarly high prevalence of alcohol consumption and alcohol use disorders compared with the general population. While the relationship between alcohol consumption and cardiovascular outcomes has been an active focus of investigation, little research has been conducted on the relationship between alcohol consumption and self-care behaviours in people with diabetes. The purpose of this study was to determine levels of alcohol consumption and to examine the cross-sectional associations between levels of alcohol consumption and self-care behaviours (use of exercise and diet as treatment for diabetes, medication-taking adherence, self-monitoring of blood glucose, HbA1c testing, and smoking) in a large, representative sample (n = 65 996) of persons with diabetes who receive care in a non-profit, group model, integrated medical care setting, Kaiser Permanente Northern California.
Setting
The Kaiser Permanente Northern California Medical Care Program (KP) is a non-profit, group practice, prepaid, health plan that is one of the largest and oldest integrated, group model health plans in the USA. KP currently provides comprehensive medical services in 17 hospitals and 32 outpatient clinics to ~3.2 million health-plan members in a 14-county region of Northern California, including the San Francisco Bay and Sacramento metropolitan areas. Approximately 30% of the population in the catchment area are members of KP. The sociodemographic characteristics of KP members are representative of the underlying population, except with respect to income, where the very poor and very wealthy are somewhat under-represented relative to the general population [2426]. The ethnic composition is quite close to that of the US census-enumerated population in the Bay Area, Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA): 7% African American vs. 9% in the underlying MSA population, 10 vs. 11% Asian/Pacific Islander, 10 vs. 14% Hispanic, and 71 vs. 64% Caucasian. The health plan maintains comprehensive administrative and clinical electronic databases that are linked through a unique medical record number assigned to each member at enrolment.
This study was approved by the Kaiser Permanente Institutional Review Board.
Source population
The Kaiser Permanente Northern California Diabetes Registry (the ‘registry’), for which methods have been described previously [11,17,2733], has been maintained continuously since its establishment in October 1993. The registry is a well-characterized population used for the study of the epidemiology and health services aspects of diabetes. Registry eligibility is based on multiple sources of case ascertainment including pharmacies (prescriptions for diabetic medications), laboratories (HbA1c ≥ 7%), and outpatient, emergency room and hospital admission records listing a diagnosis of diabetes. The registry was 99.5% sensitive for diagnosed diabetes (compared with survey-derived self report) in January 2003. All automated clinical information (pharmacy, laboratory, outpatient and inpatient diagnoses and procedures, outpatient visits with providers, and hospital admissions) is downloaded annually to provide a comprehensive, longitudinal follow-up of each registry member.
In an attempt to collect data not captured electronically, such as self-care and lifestyle behaviours, diabetes symptoms, type of diabetes and family history, all members of the KP Diabetes Registry were surveyed by mail and computer-assisted telephone interview in 1994−1997. A total of 77 722 persons responded, yielding an 83% response rate. Survey respondents were asked to report frequency of alcohol intake (days per month, in the past year) and usual consumption (number of drinks usually consumed on a day of any intake, during the past year). We include the 65 996 survey respondents who completed a version of the survey that asked for report of alcohol intake. We exclude from analysis the 11 726 survey respondents who did not respond to the first wave of mailed surveys and who then completed a shortened version of the survey that did not include questions about alcohol consumption.
We also characterized neighbourhood-level (census block group) socio-economic status by geocoding each member's address, and linking each to 1990 census-derived neighbourhood characteristics, including average annual per capita income and proportion in a working-class profession. Type of diabetes was determined from self-reported characteristics, using a published algorithm [11].
Alcohol consumption and self-care behaviours
Survey respondents were asked to report frequency of alcohol intake (days per month, in the past year) and usual consumption (number of drinks usually consumed on a day of any intake, during the past year). From these data, we calculated average daily alcohol consumption, our exposure of interest. Survey-derived self-reported alcohol consumption is a reliable measure of alcohol intake, and mailed survey and interview have been demonstrated in previous studies to yield comparable results [3437]. Cigarette smoking (current, former, never), use of exercise as treatment for diabetes, and use of diet for treatment of diabetes were also self reported in the survey.
Compliance with then-current American Diabetes Association recommendations for self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) was determined among the subset of patients who were taking insulin or oral glucose-lowering medications at the time of the survey. SMBG frequency was based on a validated measure of strip utilization [11,29]. No recommendations for SMBG frequency had been promulgated for those whose diabetes was controlled without the use of medication. Among people with Type 1 diabetes, testing of blood glucose at least three times daily was recommended; for medication-treated Type 2 diabetes, testing at least once daily was recommended. In order to account for occasionally forgetting to test, we considered average use of at least 2.5 test strips/day in Type 1 diabetes and at least 0.75 test strips/day in Type 2 diabetes to be in compliance with recommendations. We employed a standard algorithm [38] to determine medication-taking adherence. We defined poor medication refill adherence as having been without sufficient oral glucose-lowering medications at least 20% of the days of the calendar year of survey response. We also determined HbA1c testing within 1 year prior to baseline. HbA1c testing can be considered a self-care behaviour, as the test is typically requested by physicians at least annually, and patients with diabetes can obtain an HbA1c test without a health-care provider's laboratory request (i.e. without a clinic visit) in several Kaiser facilities. Thus, much of the variation in testing rates is likely to be attributable to patient follow-through. Testing for HbA1c was determined from computerized laboratory records.
Statistical methods
A series of increasingly saturated logistic regression models were specified to assess the associations of alcohol consumption with each diabetes self-care behaviour. We first specified sex- and age-adjusted models for each behaviour (model 1). In addition to alcohol consumption, age and sex, model 2 controlled for socio-economic indicators: self-reported ethnicity and educational attainment, and per cent working class in the 1990 census block group of residence. Model 3 included all the variables of model 2, plus clinical variables [duration of diabetes; obesity (body mass index ≥ 30)]. Model 4 included all the variables of model 3, plus use of diabetes pharmacotherapies (oral glucose-lowering medications, insulin). Model 5 included all the variables of model 4, plus past chronic renal failure and cardiovascular disease (ischaemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, stroke) We included these variables in model 5 in order to control for the possibility that those with lower alcohol consumption might have decreased alcohol consumption because they already had complications of diabetes. We included these potential confounders based on preliminary analyses demonstrating that each was associated both with average alcohol consumption and with at least one of the self-care behaviours. Given that adherence to each self-care behaviour was a common outcome, odds ratios would be a biased measure of association [39]. We therefore relied on predicted probabilities of adherence at each level of alcohol consumption as our measure of effect.
Evaluation of response bias
Over 93% of survey respondents answered both questions regarding alcohol consumption. Compared with the 61 511 subjects who answered both questions, the 4485 subjects who did not answer one or both alcohol consumption questions were older and more likely to be female, non-white, have no more than a high-school education, and to live in a working-class neighbourhood (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). These 4485 were also more likely to have Type 1 diabetes, have had diabetes for a longer duration, have hypertension and use anti-hypertensive medication (P < 0.001); have peripheral neuropathy (P = 0.03); and less likely to be obese (P < 0.001) or use medications to treat dyslipidaemia (P = 0.02). The prevalence of current smoking was not significantly different between those who did and did not answer the alcohol questions.
Study subject characteristics
Selected characteristics of study subjects are presented in Table 1. Approximately half consumed alcohol during the past year. Twenty-eight per cent were former drinkers and 21% lifetime abstainers. Forty-three per cent consumed less than one alcohol-containing drink per day, 4.6% consumed 1−1.9 drinks/day, 1.5% consumed 2−2.9 drinks/day, and only 1.6% consumed three or more drinks per day. Non-drinkers were older, more likely to live in predominantly working-class neighbourhoods, and more likely to have no more than a high-school education than those who consumed any quantity of alcohol. Heavy alcohol drinkers (≥ 3 drinks/day) had the highest prevalence of hypertension and peripheral neuropathy; the lowest frequency of long-standing (> 20 years) diabetes; the lowest percentage of women; and the lowest frequency of use of insulin, lipid-lowering medications, and anti-hypertensive agents (among those with hypertension).
Table 1
Table 1
Patient characteristics for Kaiser Permanente members with diabetes (1994−97 survey responders; 83% response rate), by self-reported average daily number of alcohol-containing drinks consumed in the past year
Self-care behaviours
Predicted probability of adherence to recommended self-care behaviours by level of alcohol consumption are presented in Fig. 1. For each of the self-care behaviours, we present predicted probabilities for the age- and sex-adjusted model (model 1) and the most saturated model (model 5). There was very little confounding, and thus model adjustment resulted in only trivially different results. For each of the six self-care behaviours we examined, we found a gradient of compliance across level of alcohol consumption: those who consumed greater quantities of alcohol were less likely to comply with recommended self-care behaviours than those who consumed less. Former drinkers were the most likely to be compliant with each of the recommended self-care behaviours, except use of exercise to treat diabetes (consumers of < 1 drink/day were most likely to exercise) and current smoking (lifetime alcohol abstainers were least likely to smoke). The behaviour pattern of lifetime alcohol abstainers was similar to that of consumers of low levels of alcohol (< 1 drink/day).
Figure 1
Figure 1
Predicted probability of adherence to each of six diabetes self-care behaviours, by average daily consumption of alcohol-containing drinks in the past year: (a) Use of exercise to treat diabetes; (b) use of diet to treat diabetes; (c) non-adherence to (more ...)
We found that people with diabetes in this insured population reported lower levels of current alcohol consumption than those that have been reported by the general US adult population. The prevalence of any alcohol consumption in the past year was 50.8% in adults with diabetes, compared with 61.9% reported in the 2002 National Health Interview Survey [40]. This difference appeared to be as a result of the higher prevalence of former drinkers among people with diabetes compared with the general population (28.0 and 15.0%, respectively), as the prevalence of lifetime abstainers was nearly identical (21.2 and 22.1%, respectively). This suggests that people with diabetes may have curtailed their alcohol consumption because of declining health, perceived risk of alcohol on diabetes course [41,42] or because of physician advice to limit alcohol intake [4346].
Alcohol use was associated with key self-care behaviours that are important for the health of patients with diabetes. We observed a gradient of increasing risk for poor adherence to diabetes self-care behaviours with increasing alcohol consumption, starting with those who consume even one drink a day. For use of exercise and smoking abstinence, we found statistically significant differences between lifetime abstainers and consumers of less than one drink a day and, for SMBG adherence, we found statistically significant differences between former drinkers and consumers of less than one drink a day. Former drinkers had the greatest compliance with each self-care behaviour, except current smoking. Our findings confirm those of previous investigators that former drinkers and lifetime abstainers have a different profile of risk behaviours [47]. Former drinkers may include those who stopped drinking as a result of a perceived or actual worsening of diabetes disease course.
Our findings might be explained by alcohol consumption being a marker for a set of disadvantageous health-related behaviours. Alcohol use has been shown to be inversely associated with frequency of outpatient visits in the insured population from which the patients in our study were drawn [48]. Alternatively, the disinhibitory effects or expectations of alcohol might explain poor adherence among regular, heavy drinkers. However, dis-inhibition would be less likely to explain differences among patients with low vs. moderate levels of alcohol consumption.
This is the largest study to date to examine the association of alcohol consumption with self-care behaviours within an ethnically diverse cohort of patients with diabetes. Because we had a high survey response rate of 83% and the demographic composition of our study population was representative of the general population, our findings are likely to reflect general patterns in insured patients with diabetes. Our findings extend those of past studies that found alcohol consumption was related to poorer compliance with diabetes self-care behaviours in more limited populations, including 154 older men treated at a Veterans Administration clinic [49], 176 patients treated in a tertiary-care clinic in Mexico City [50], and 392 minority patients at inner-city primary care clinics [51]. The finding that alcohol consumption was consistently associated with poorer adherence with each of six diabetes self-care behaviours strengthens our conclusion that excess alcohol consumption may be detrimental to the health-care behaviours that improve control of diabetes.
Our study had several limitations. This cross-sectional study was designed to assess associations, not causation. Our study was not designed to determine the prevalence of alcohol use disorders. As with all human studies of the relationship between alcohol consumption and behaviours, randomization was not possible. Heavy alcohol consumption is likely to be a marker for a larger set of adverse health-care behaviours and risk factors. We relied on self report of alcohol consumption. If some of the heavy drinkers underreported their levels of alcohol consumption, this would have created a conservative bias (i.e. an underestimate of the gradient of association).
Our study findings have methodological implications for epidemiological studies of the effects of alcohol consumption on physiological outcomes such as glycaemic control, dyslipidaemia, and cardiovascular events. As an example, moderately increased alcohol consumption has been associated with lower risk of cardiovascular events, despite its associations with lower adherence to self-care behaviours. Thus, the estimates of the effect of alcohol consumption on cardiovascular events will be conservatively biased unless they control for confounding as a result of self-care behaviours, given that increasing alcohol consumption is associated with lower adherence to self-care behaviours, which in turn is associated with poorer glycaemic control, a predictor of diabetes complications.
We observed modestly reduced adherence to recommended self-care behaviours even in people with low to moderate alcohol consumption. Furthermore, this alcohol-behaviour gradient persisted even after adjustment for a wide variety of socio-economic, disease severity, and treatment variables. Our study highlights the importance of alcohol consumption as a marker and potential risk factor for poorer adherence to diabetes self-care behaviours. This suggests that diabetes health-care providers should routinely ask their patients about alcohol consumption and be aware that heavy consumption may be a marker for poor self-care behaviours, as well as for increased risk of alcohol use disorders.
Further study is warranted to assess whether physician advice to decrease alcohol consumption among heavy drinkers is associated with improved adherence to self-care recommendations and reduced risk for diabetes complications. Additionally, given the evidence that low to moderate alcohol intake may have cardiovascular benefits for patients with diabetes [5257], examination of the trade-offs between cardiovascular benefits vs. risk of lower adherence with self-care behaviours is needed. Similarly, clinical recommendations for alcohol consumption among people with diabetes need to balance the clinical benefits of moderate consumption and the potential risks of lowered adherence to self-care behaviours.
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by the Kaiser Foundation Community Benefit Program. We thank Constance M. Weisner and Jennifer Mertens for their thoughtful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript.
Abbreviations
KPKaiser Permanente Northern California Medical Care Program
MSAMetropolitan Statistical Area
SMBGself-monitoring of blood glucose

Footnotes
Competing interests
None declared.
1. Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Bowman BA, Dietz WH, Vinicor F, Bales VS, et al. Prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and obesity-related health risk factors. J Am Med Assoc. 2001;2003;289:76–79.
2. USRDS Annual Data Report. USRDS; Bethesda, MD: 2001. Atlas of End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States.
3. Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, van Houtum WH, Harkless LB. The impact of gender on amputation. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1997;36:66–69. [PubMed]
4. Morris AD, McAlpine R, Steinke D, Boyle DI, Ebrahim AR, Vasudev N, et al. Diabetes and lower-limb amputations in the community. A retrospective cohort study. DARTS/MEMO Collaboration. Diabetes Audit and Research in Tayside Scotland/Medicines Monitoring Unit. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:738–743. [PubMed]
5. Most RS, Sinnock P. The epidemiology of lower extremity amputations in diabetic individuals. Diabetes Care. 1983;6:87–91. [PubMed]
6. Siitonen OI, Niskanen LK, Laakso M, Siitonen JT, Pyorala K. Lower-extremity amputations in diabetic and non-diabetic patients. A population-based study in eastern Finland. Diabetes Care. 1993;16:16–20. [PubMed]
7. Trautner C, Haastert B, Giani G, Berger M. Incidence of lower limb amputations and diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1996;19:1006–1009. [PubMed]
8. van Houtum WH, Lavery LA, Harkless LB. The impact of diabetes-related lower-extremity amputations in the Netherlands. J Diabetes Complications. 1996;10:325–330. [PubMed]
9. Hogan P, Dall T, Nikolov P. Economic costs of diabetes in the US in 2002. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:917–932. [PubMed]
10. Karter AJ, Parker MM, Moffet HH, Ahmed AT, Ferrara A, Liu JY, et al. Missed appointments and poor glycemic control: an opportunity to identify high-risk diabetic patients. Med Care. 2004;42:110–115. [PubMed]
11. Karter AJ, Ackerson LM, Darbinian JA, D'Agostino RB, Jr, Ferrara A, Liu J, et al. Self-monitoring of blood glucose levels and glycemic control: the Northern California Kaiser Permanente Diabetes registry. Am J Med. 2001;111:1–9. [PubMed]
12. Castaneda C, Layne JE, Munoz-Orians L, Gordon PL, Walsmith J, Foldvari M, et al. A randomized controlled trial of resistance exercise training to improve glycemic control in older adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:2335–2341. [PubMed]
13. Khan S, Rupp J. The effect of exercise conditioning, diet, and drug therapy on glycosylated hemoglobin levels in type 2 (NIDDM) diabetics. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1995;35:281–288. [PubMed]
14. Delahanty LM, Halford BN. The role of diet behaviors in achieving improved glycemic control in intensively treated patients in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes Care. 1993;16:1453–1458. [PubMed]
15. Piette JD, Wagner TH, Potter MB, Schillinger D. Health insurance status, cost-related medication under use, and outcomes among diabetes patients in three systems of care. Med Care. 2004;42:102–109. [PubMed]
16. Schectman JM, Nadkarni MM, Voss JD. The association between diabetes metabolic control and drug adherence in an indigent population. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:1015–1021. [PubMed]
17. Iribarren C, Karter AJ, Go AS, Ferrara A, Liu JY, Sidney S, et al. Glycemic control and heart failure among adult patients with diabetes. Circulation. 2001;103:2668–2673. [PubMed]
18. Jbour AS, Jarrah NS, Radaideh AM, Shegem NS, Bader IM, Batieha AM, et al. Prevalence and predictors of diabetic foot syndrome in type 2 diabetes mellitus in Jordan. Saudi Med J. 2003;24:761–764. [PubMed]
19. Muhlhauser I, Overmann H, Bender R, Jorgens V, Berger M. Predictors of mortality and end-stage diabetic complications in patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus on intensified insulin therapy. Diabet Med. 2000;17:727–734. [PubMed]
20. Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, Matthews DR, Manley SE, Cull CA, et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. Br Med J. 2000;321:405–412. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Tesfaye S, Stevens LK, Stephenson JM, Fuller JH, Plater M, Ionescu-Tirgoviste C, et al. Prevalence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy and its relation to glycaemic control and potential risk factors: the EURO-DIAB IDDM Complications Study. Diabetologia. 1996;39:1377–1384. [PubMed]
22. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; Rockville, MD: 2004. Overview of Findings from the 2003 National Survey on Drug Use and Health.
23. Grant BF, Dawson DA, Stinson FS, Chou SP, Dufour MC, Pickering RP. The 12-month prevalence and trends in DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence: United States, 1991–1992 and 2001–2002. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004;74:223–234. [PubMed]
24. Gordon NP, Kaplan GA. Some evidence refuting the HMO ‘favorable selection’ hypothesis. the case of Kaiser Permanente. Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res. 1991;12:19–39. [PubMed]
25. Hiatt RA, Friedman GD. Characteristics of patients referred for treatment of end-stage renal disease in a defined population. Am J Public Health. 1982;72:829–833. [PubMed]
26. Krieger N. Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: validation and application of a census-based methodology. Am J Public Health. 1992;82:703–710. [PubMed]
27. Ferrara A, Karter AJ, Ackerson LM, Liu JY, Selby JV. Hormone replacement therapy is associated with better glycemic control in women with type 2 diabetes. The Northern California Kaiser Permanente Diabetes Registry. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:1144–1150. [PubMed]
28. Karter AJ, Rowell SE, Ackerson LM, Mitchell BD, Ferrara A, Selby JV, et al. Excess maternal transmission of type 2 diabetes. The Northern California Kaiser Permanente Diabetes Registry. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:938–943. [PubMed]
29. Karter AJ, Ferrara A, Darbinian JA, Ackerson LM, Selby JV. Self-monitoring of blood glucose: language and financial barriers in a managed care population with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:477–483. [PubMed]
30. Karter AJ, Ferrara A, Liu JY, Moffet HH, Ackerson LM, Selby JV. Ethnic disparities in diabetic complications in an insured population. J Am Med Assoc. 2002;287:2519–2527.
31. Selby JV, Ray GT, Zhang D, Colby CJ. Excess costs of medical care for patients with diabetes in a managed care population. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:1396–1402. [PubMed]
32. Selby JV, Ettinger B, Swain BE, Brown JB. First 20 months' experience with use of metformin for type 2 diabetes in a large health maintenance organization. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:38–44. [PubMed]
33. Selby JV, Karter AJ, Ackerson LM, Ferrara A, Liu J. Developing a prediction rule from automated clinical databases to identify high-risk patients in a large population with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:1547–1555. [PubMed]
34. Gronbaek M, Heitmann BL. Validity of self-reported intakes of wine, beer and spirits in population studies. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1996 July;50:487–490. [PubMed]
35. Friesema IH, Veenstra MY, Zwietering PJ, Knottnerus JA, Garretsen HF, Lemmens PH. Measurement of lifetime alcohol intake: utility of a self-administered questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159:809–817. [PubMed]
36. Harris TR, Wilsnack RW, Klassen AD. Reliability of retrospective self-reports of alcohol consumption among women: data from a US national sample. J Stud Alcohol. 1994;55:309–314. [PubMed]
37. Bongers IM, van Oers JA. Mode effects on self-reported alcohol use and problem drinking: mail questionnaires and personal interviewing compared. J Stud Alcohol. 1998 May;59:280–285. [PubMed]
38. Steiner JF, Koepsell TD, Fihn SD, Inui TS. A general method of compliance assessment using centralized pharmacy records. Description and validation. Med Care. 1988;26:814–823. [PubMed]
39. Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Modern Epidemiology. 2nd edn. Lippincott-Raven; Philadelphia: 1998. pp. 110–111.
40. Lethbridge-Cejku M, Schiller JS, Bernadel L. Summary Health Statistics for US Adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2002. Report no. 10. National Center for Health Statistics; Hyattsville, MD: 2004.
41. Zins M, Carle F, Bugel I, Leclerc A, Di Orio F, Goldberg M. Predictors of change in alcohol consumption among Frenchmen of the GAZEL study cohort. Addiction. 1999;94:385–395. [PubMed]
42. Poikolainen K, Vartiainen E, Korhonen HJ. Alcohol intake and subjective health. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;144:346–350. [PubMed]
43. Burman ML, Kivlahan D, Buchbinder M, Broglio K, Zhou XH, Merrill JO, et al. Alcohol-related advice for veterans affairs primary care patients: Who gets it? Who gives it? J Stud Alcohol. 2004;65:621–30. [PubMed]
44. Reiff-Hekking S, Ockene JK, Hurley TG, Reed GW. Brief physician and nurse practitioner-delivered counseling for high-risk drinking. Results at 12-month follow-up. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:7–13. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. Grossberg PM, Brown DD, Fleming MF. Brief physician advice for high-risk drinking among young adults. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2:474–480. [PubMed]
46. Fleming MF, Mundt MP, French MT, Manwell LB, Stauffacher EA, Barry KL. Brief physician advice for problem drinkers: long-term efficacy and benefit-cost analysis. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2002;26:36–43. [PubMed]
47. Cryer PC, Saunders J, Jenkins LM, Neale H, Cook AC, Peters TJ. Clusters within a general adult population of alcohol abstainers. Int J Epidemiol. 2001;30:756–765. [PubMed]
48. Armstrong MA, Midanik LT, Klatsky AL. Alcohol consumption and utilization of health services in a health maintenance organization. Med Care. 1998;36:1599–1605. [PubMed]
49. Cox WM, Blount JP, Crowe PA, Singh SP. Diabetic patients' alcohol use and quality of life: relationships with prescribed treatment compliance among older males. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1996;20:327–331. [PubMed]
50. Lerman I, Lozano L, Villa AR, Hernandez-Jimenez S, Weinger K, Caballero AE, et al. Psychosocial factors associated with poor diabetes self-care management in a specialized center in Mexico City. Biomed Pharmacother. 2004;58:566–570. [PubMed]
51. Johnson KH, Bazargan M, Bing EG. Alcohol consumption and compliance among inner-city minority patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:964–970. [PubMed]
52. Howard AA, Arnsten JH, Gourevitch MN. Effect of alcohol consumption on diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140:211–219. [PubMed]
53. Ajani UA, Gaziano JM, Lotufo PA, Liu S, Hennekens CH, Buring JE, et al. Alcohol consumption and risk of coronary heart disease by diabetes status. Circulation. 2000;102:500–505. [PubMed]
54. Solomon CG, Hu FB, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Speizer FE, Rimm EB, et al. Moderate alcohol consumption and risk of coronary heart disease among women with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 2000;102:494–499. [PubMed]
55. Tanasescu M, Hu FB. Alcohol consumption and risk of coronary heart disease among individuals with type 2 diabetes. Curr Diab Rep. 2001;1:187–191. [PubMed]
56. Tanasescu M, Hu FB, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, Rimm EB. Alcohol consumption and risk of coronary heart disease among men with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:1836–1842. [PubMed]
57. Valmadrid CT, Klein R, Moss SE, Klein BE, Cruickshanks KJ. Alcohol intake and the risk of coronary heart disease mortality in persons with older-onset diabetes mellitus. J Am Med Assoc. 1999;282:239–246.