PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of wtpaEurope PMCEurope PMC Funders GroupSubmit a Manuscript
 
Development. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 February 5.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2229809
EMSID: UKMS1476

tombola, a tesmin/TSO1 family protein, regulates transcriptional activation in the Drosophila male germline and physically interacts with Always early

Summary

During male gametogenesis a developmentally regulated and cell type specific transcriptional programme is activated in primary spermatocytes to prepare for differentiation of sperm. The Drosophila aly-class meiotic arrest loci (aly, comr, achi/vis and topi) are essential for activation of transcription of many differentiation-specific genes, and several genes important for meiotic cell cycle progression, thus linking meiotic divisions to cellular differentiation during spermatogenesis. Protein interaction studies suggests that the aly-class gene products form a chromatin-associated complex in primary spermatocytes. We identify, clone and characterise a new aly-class meiotic arrest gene, tombola (tomb), which encodes a testis-specific CXC domain protein that interacts with Aly. The tomb mutant phenotype is more like aly and comr than like achi/vis or topi in terms of target gene profile and chromosome morphology. tomb encodes a chromatin-associated protein required for localisation of Aly and Comr, but not Topi, to chromatin Reciprocally, aly and comr, but not topi or achi/vis, are required to maintain the normal localisation of Tomb. tomb and aly may be components of a complex paralogous to the Drosophila dREAM/MybMuv-B and C. elegans DRM transcriptional regulatory complexes.

Keywords: Spermatogenesis, transcription, SynMuv, differentiation, CXC

Introduction

Differential control of gene expression during development is crucial for specification and maintenance of differentiated cell types. One of the most dramatic gene expression switches occurs in primary spermatocytes during spermatogenesis; many genes are active only in these cells. Some are germ-line specific homologues of ubiquitously expressed genes (e.g. β-2 tubulin (Kemphues et al., 1979) and testis specific proteasome components (Ma et al., 2002)), others are spermatogenesis specific proteins (e.g. the protamines that replace histones to tightly package sperm DNA (Jayaramaiah Raja and Renkawitz-Pohl, 2005)).

In both mammals and insects, germ-line stem cells divide to produce spermatogonia. After further mitotic amplification divisions (4 in Drosophila melanogaster), spermatogonia become primary spermatocytes, committed to differentiation (reviewed in (Fuller, 1993)). This developmental transition results in transcriptional activation, in primary spermatocytes, of a large suite of genes required for meiosis and spermiogenesis. In Drosophila transcription stops before the meiotic divisions, so transcripts for late acting proteins are made pre-meiotically (Olivieri and Olivieri, 1965). Meiotic arrest mutant testes accumulate primary spermatocytes, but lack later stages of spermatogenesis since mutant primary spermatocytes fail to initiate transcription of many genes whose products are required after meiosis. Meiotic arrest mutants also fail to express some meiotic gene products; aly-class differ from can-class in their regulation of certain cell cycle genes (Lin et al., 1996; White-Cooper et al., 1998). Through their function in controlling production of cell cycle and differentiation gene products, the meiotic arrest genes co-ordinate the independent processes of meiosis and spermatid morphogenesis.

always early (aly)-class meiotic arrest genes have a broader target range than and cannonball (can)-class. Four aly- and five can-class meiotic arrest loci have been described. (Ayyar et al., 2003; Hiller et al., 2004; Hiller et al., 2001a; Jiang and White-Cooper, 2003; Perezgazga et al., 2004; Wang and Mann, 2003; White-Cooper et al., 2000; White-Cooper et al., 1998). aly encodes one of two Drosophila homologues of the C. elegans synMuvB gene lin-9, the other homologue being mip130 (Beitel et al., 2000; White-Cooper et al., 2000). cookie monster (comr) encodes a novel protein of unknown function (Jiang and White-Cooper, 2003). achintya/vismay (achi/vis) and matotopetli (topi) encode sequence specific DNA binding proteins (Ayyar et al., 2003; Perezgazga et al., 2004; Wang and Mann, 2003). Aly, Comr and Achi/Vis proteins co-immunoprecipitate from testis extracts; Topi was identified in a yeast two-hybrid for Comr interactors (Perezgazga et al., 2004; Wang and Mann, 2003). Despite the interactions between aly-class gene products the aly and comr mutant phenotypes are subtly different from those of topi and achi/vis. Aly and Comr nuclear localisations are mutually dependent, while these proteins require topi and achi/vis for their concentration on chromatin. aly or comr (but not topi or achi/vis) mutants display defects in chromatin organisation. Finally a small subset of genes are much more dependent on topi and/or achi/vis than on aly or comr for their transcription (Jiang and White-Cooper, 2003; Perezgazga et al., 2004).

To find more transcriptional regulators in primary spermatocytes, we screened for Aly-binding proteins. We have identified and characterised a new Drosophila meiotic arrest gene, tombola (tomb), which is expressed specifically in testis. tomb encodes the second Drosophila member of the tesmin/TSO1 CXC domain protein family, the other being the Mip120 a subunit of the same complex as Mip130. We show that Tomb complexes with Aly and Comr. We identify a tomb mutant and show that tomb mutant testes have an aly-class meiotic arrest phenotype more like that of aly and comr than of topi and achi/vis. Aly and Comr proteins fail to associate with chromatin in the absence of tomb function. Topi protein also localises to chromatin in wild-type and achi/vis primary spermatocytes, but not in aly, comr or tomb mutant cells. Ectopically expressed eGFP-Tomb concentration on chromatin in nucleus is normal in achi/vis, or can-class mutants, but is altered in aly and comr mutants.

Materials and Methods

Fly husbandry and strains

Flies were raised on standard cornmeal (or wheat meal) sucrose agar at 25°C. Visible markers and balancer chromosomes are described in Flybase (FlyBase, 1999). P[GS]12862/CyO was from Kyoto Drosophila stock centre. Mutant alleles used were aly5, comrZ1340, achiZ3922visZ3922, topiZ3-2139, nhtZ2-5946. w1118 or red e were used as wild type controls.

Deficiency mapping and P-element excision

Df(2L)cl-h3/SM6b and Df(2L)cl-h1/CyO, amosRoi-1 (Bloomington Drosophila stock centre) were crossed to P[GS]12862/CyO. Excision of the P[GS]12862 insertion was carried out by crossing w; P[GS]12862/CyO, Δ2-3 males to w; Tft/CyO females, recovering individual white-eyed progeny and back-crossing to w; Tft/CyO to establish stocks. Excision lines were analysed by testis squashing and PCR and sequencing of the ORF. Females were crossed to their balanced brothers to test for fertility; male fertility was tested by crossing to virgin w1118 females. The testis phenotype was scored by phase contrast microscopy after dissection and squashing.

Yeast-2-hybrid screen and analysis

An Aly(C-terminus)-Gal4-DNA-Binding Domain (Aly(C)-DB) fusion construct was made by subcloning the ORF from aa 275 to 534 from a full length aly cDNA clone into pGBKT7. We generated and screened a testis cDNA-Gal4-Activation Domain (AD) fusion protein library using the Matchmaker library construction & screening kit (Clontech) as previously described (Perezgazga et al., 2004). Colonies were picked from SD/-Ade/-His/-Leu/-Trp selection plates after seven days. 106 independent co-transformants yielded 90 colonies that grew under selective conditions and were blue in presence of X-α-Gal. To test for interaction between Tomb and Comr, AH109 yeast cells were co-transformed with pGADT7-Rec-Tomb and pGBKT7-Comr or pGBKT7-CG15031 (CG15031 was another clone isolated the yeast 2-hybrid screen) as a negative control. Transformed cells were plated on SD/-Ade-His-Leu-Trp selection plates containing X-α-Gal.

Deletion analysis plasmid construction

PCR products for Tomb deletion derivatives (aa residues: 1-73; 1-136; 73-243; 136-243) and full length Tomb were subcloned into pACT2. Co-transformation of AH109 yeast cells was with pGBKT7-Aly(C) or pGBKT7-Kr(Zn-finger) as negative control (Perezgazga et al., 2004). Transformed cells were plated on SD/-Ade-His-Leu-Trp/X-α-Gal plates.

RT-PCR expression analysis

For semi-quantitative RT-PCR, total RNA was extracted from dissected testes with Trizol (Invitrogen) and resuspended in RNAse free water (3 testes /μl). 1st strand cDNA was generated from 4μl of this sample using oligo-dT primers with the SuperScript II reverse transcriptase system (Invitrogen). cDNA derived from 0.18 testes (0.3 μl of RT reaction) was used for each RT-PCR reaction and amplified with Taq DNA polymerase (Qiagen) with 24 amplification cycles. Genomic DNA from wild type flies was used as a positive PCR control, and a no-reverse transcriptase (no-RT) reaction on wild-type RNA served as a negative control. For RT-PCR from various developmental stages total RNA was extracted with Trizol, and cDNA was made as above and PCR amplification was carried out for 30 cycles. For re-amplification, 0.5 μl of the first PCR product was used as the template for a further 30 cycle PCR reaction.

Mapping the 5′ and 3′ ends of tomb

A 3′ RACE kit from (Invitrogen) was used, following the manufacturer's instructions. The RACE products were either directly sequenced, or were subcloned into pGEM-T-Easy for sequencing. For the 5′ end, RT-PCR was performed using a series of primers upstream of the ATG, paired with a 3′ primer within the coding sequence.

Co-expression and -IP from tissue culture cells and testis extracts

The full length tomb ORF was subcloned into the mammalian tissue culture expression vector, HA-tagged pCDF3. The full length aly ORF and Kr Zn-finger region (Perezgazga et al., 2004) were similarly subcloned into FLAG-tagged pCDF3. 293T human kidney cells were co-transfected with plasmids for expression of HA-Tomb and FLAG-Aly, or HA-Tomb and FLAG-Kr(Zn-finger), respectively with lipofectamine 2000 reagent (Invitrogen). Co-immunoprecipitation was as previously described (Perezgazga et al., 2004).

Testes dissected from EGFP-Tomb expressing flies were homogenised in lysis buffer (50mM Tris-HCl pH7.5-8.0; 0.5% Triton-X 100; 150mM NaCl; Protease inhibitors) (146 testes, 500μl buffer used), incubated with ethidium bromide (400 μg/ml) for 30 min at 4 °C, then cleared by centrifugation. 20μl was retained as the “input” sample, the remainder was pre-cleared with protein G sepharose, then incubated with mouse anti-GFP (Roche) and precipitated with protein G sepharose. Beads were washed, then bound proteins were eluted by boiling in SDS sample buffer. Wild type testes were processed in parallel as a negative control.

GFP fusion construct

The tomb ORF was subcloned in frame into pUAST-EGFP (Parker et al., 2001). Numerous independent P-element mediated insertions were recovered using standard transformation protocols after injection of w1118 embryos. EGFP-tomb fusion protein expression was driven using Bam-Gal4-VP16, which expresses just before the onset of meiotic arrest gene expression and works in all the mutant backgrounds (Chen and McKearin, 2003). Bam-GAL4-VP16 (on chromosome 3) was recombined with a third chromosome UAS-EGFP-Tomb insertion, and the chromosome was used homozygous to express tagged protein in testes homozygous for second chromosome male steriles (tomb, achi/vis, comr, nht). Bam-GAL4-VP16 was recombined with aly5 to allow expression from a homozygous second chromosome linked UAS-EGFP-tomb insertion in this mutant background.

Generation of the anti-Topi antibody

Anti-peptide antibodies were raised by Moravian-Biotechnology. The synthesised oligo-peptide KNNPTKPIFSDTYL from the Topi C-terminus was coupled to BSA and used to immunise two rats. The staining patterns for these sera were indistinguishable.

Microscopy and immunofluorescence

Live testes were dissected, squashed in 2 μg/ml Hoechst 33342 in testis buffer (183 mM KCl, 47 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris pH6.8) and examined by phase contrast and fluorescence microscopy. Images were captured with a Q-imaging Retiga 1300 monochrome CCD camera linked to an Olympus BX50 microscope using Openlab software (Improvision) or on a JVC KY-F75U 3-colour CCD camera with KY-Link software, and imported into Photoshop. Aly, Comr and Topi proteins were visualised by indirect immuno-fluorescent staining, using rabbit anti-Aly (1:2000), rabbit anti-Comr (1:1000) or rat anti-Topi (1:1000) antibodies detected with FITC-conjugated secondary antibodies (Jackson), as described (Jiang and White-Cooper, 2003; White-Cooper et al., 2000). DNA was co-stained with propidium iodide. Cells were imaged using a BioRad Radiance Plus confocal microscope mounted on a Nikon E800.

RNA in situ hybridisation

Dig-labelled anti-sense probes for cyclinB, Mst87F and polo were generated as previously described (White-Cooper et al., 1998). To synthesise RNA probes for CG3330, CG3927 and CG12907, we generated 400-600bp RT-PCR products using total testis RNA as a template. For tomb the PCR amplified the entire ORF. The 3' PCR primers included a T3 RNA polymerase promoter site for in vitro transcription of dig-labelled anti-sense RNA probes. In situ hybridisation was carried out as described (White-Cooper et al., 1998). Primer sequences available on request.

Results

A tesmin-family CXC motif protein, Tombola, interacts with Aly and Comr

We conducted a yeast-2-hybrid screen to identify proteins that act with Aly to control transcriptional activation in Drosophila primary spermatocytes. Using the Aly C-terminal half as bait we recovered seven independent clones of CG14016; we named this gene tombola (tomb) based on the testis phenotype - mutant testes resemble a tube full of balls, as in the lottery game. Co-immunoprecipitation of transiently expressed tagged proteins from tissue culture cells confirmed the interaction between Aly and Tomb proteins. 293T cells were co-transfected to express HA-tagged Tomb (HA-Tomb) and FLAG-tagged Aly (FLAG-Aly). Immunoprecipitation with anti-FLAG antibodies, followed by Western blotting with anti-HA antibodies showed that Tomb co-immuno-precipitated with Aly (Figure 1A). This was confirmed with the reciprocal experiment – immuno-precipition with anti-HA followed by blotting with anti-FLAG. We detected no co-immunoprecipitation in cells co-expressing HA-Tomb and FLAG-Kr (FLAG fused to the 5 Zn-finger motif region of Kruppel (Perezgazga et al., 2004)). To test the in vivo interaction between Aly and Tomb, and to test whether DNA was implicated in the interaction, we made extracts from EGFP-Tomb expressing testes (see later), incubated the extracts with ethidium bromide, and immunoprecipitated using anti-GFP. We found that Aly co-immunoprecipitated with EGFP-Tomb, showing that the interaction occurs in testes, and is DNA independent (Figure 1B). To define the Aly-interaction region of Tomb we generated deletion constructs and tested their ability to interact in the two-hybrid system. The Aly-interaction domain is found in the C-terminal half of Tomb (from aa 136-243).

Figure 1
Aly and Tomb proteins interact

Since aly and comr have identical mutant phenotypes we suspect these gene products probably act together in a complex, but we have not detected directly interaction between these proteins. We tested the ability of Tomb to bind Comr by two-hybrid analysis. Yeast co-transformed with Tomb-AD and Comr-DB grew under selective conditions, demonstrating that Comr can interact with Tomb. The Tomb-Aly and Tomb-Comr interactions were specific since yeast co-transformed with Tomb-AD and CG15031-DB were unable to grow under selective conditions. Co-expression and co-immunoprecipitation experiments in tissue culture cells confirmed that FLAG-Tomb can interact with HA-Comr (data not shown).

The tomb genomic region is complex (Figure 2A). The tomb ORF is embedded within, but in the opposite orientation to, the 3′ UTR of CG31989 a conserved predicted protein of unknown function. As no tomb cDNA clones have been sequenced we mapped the 5′ and 3′ ends by RACE and RT-PCR. tomb 5′ end of overlaps the 3′ end of the adjacent gene CG14015. Translation of the tomb ORF gave a 243 aa conceptual protein, with a predicted Mw of 26 kD and a theoretical pI of 9.4. The predicted Tomb protein contains a nuclear localisation signal and a CXC motif of the tesmin/TSO1 family (Figure 2B). Tesmin has been described in vertebrates, while TSO1 is from Arabidopsis, indicating that this domain is conserved between animals and plants. The only other Drosophila tesmin/TSO1 CXC domain protein, Mip120, has been found in a complex with the second Drosophila lin-9 (aly) homologue, Mip130 (Beall et al., 2002; Korenjak et al., 2004; Lewis et al., 2004). A second tesmin/TSO1 CXC domain protein, which we refer to as tesmin-like (tesl), was found in humans and mouse. C. elegans has a single member of this family, LIN-54 (JC8.6), sea urchin and ciona each have one homologue. Including TSO1, the A. thaliana genome has 11 tesmin/TSO1 family members.

Figure 2
The tombola genetic region and analysis of predicted sequence

Comparison of the tesmin/TSO1 domain proteins revealed that tomb was unusual in only having a single CXC domain (Figure 2C). All other family members have either two domains (vertebrate tesl, worm LIN-54 and plant TSO1), or one and a half CXC domains (vertebrate tesmin and plant SOL2). These domains were separated by a conserved 42aa spacer in animals (50aa in plants). The first and second CXC domains contain several residues in common, however they are distinguished by characteristic amino acids conserved within repeat 1 or 2 but not between repeats (Figure 2C). The 1 1/2 CXC domain proteins lack the N-terminus of the first domain, while tomb has only the second CXC domain. E(z) CXC-like domains fall into a separate family.

We also identified a 52aa additional region of homology between the animal proteins near the C-terminus (31% identity, 50% similarity between mip120 and hs-tes; 33% identity and 42% similarity between tomb and hs-tes). Although the primary sequence conservation is low these sequences are strongly predicted to form a helix-coil-helix secondary structure (PSIpred, (McGuffin et al., 2000)) (Figure 2D). The Aly-interaction domain of Tomb includes this conserved motif but not the CXC domain.

tomb expression is testis specific

We investigated the tomb developmental expression profile by RT-PCR. tomb is entirely included within the CG31989 3′ UTR, however they are encoded on opposite strands. tomb contains a 62bp intron, while the CG31989 3′ UTR lacks introns, allowing us to distinguish the transcripts. tomb transcript was detected only in testis (Figure 3A). Unspliced products, derived from CG31989 transcripts, were not produced from the testis sample, but were found, after re-amplification, in gonadectomised adults (both males and females) and embryos (0-16 hr) (data not shown).

Figure 3
tomb expression is primary spermatocyte specific

We determined the testes tomb expression pattern by RNA in situ hybridisation, and found that tomb is expressed highly in early primary spermatocytes (arrows in Figure 3C), with transcript abundance declining as primary spermatocytes mature (arrowheads in Figure 3C). The tomb expression pattern in testes was essentially identical to the other aly-class meiotic arrest loci. We found, using RT-PCR, that tomb was expressed in other meiotic arrest mutants (aly, comr, achi/vis, topi, mia, sa, nht), indicating that tomb expression does not depend on the activity of any known meiotic arrest gene (aly and mia shown, Figure 3B). By RT-PCR, some elevation of the tomb transcript level was seen in mutant testes. This apparent increase in transcript abundance was not due to uniform increased expression, rather the transcript appeared specifically more abundant in mutant mature primary spermatocytes than wild type mature primary spermatocytes (Figure 3D).

tomb is a meiotic arrest gene

To further characterise tomb function we searched P-element mutagenesis databases (BDGP, Baylor, Cambridge and Kyoto) and found a potential tomb mutant allele in the Kyoto P-collection (Toba et al., 1999). Inverse PCR and sequencing of the flanking DNA of P[GS]12862 confirmed that the element was inserted in codon 174 of tomb. The P[GS]12862 line was homozygous viable, but male sterile. Homozygous females were initially semi-sterile, however this phenotype was later lost from the stock.

The mutant phenotype of P[GS]12862 could be due to disruption of the function of tomb or CG31989 or both, or could be unrelated to the P-insertion. We tested the contribution of CG31989 to the phenotype using P[EY]00456, a P-element insertion in the CG31989 ORF. P[EY]00456 mutant flies were homozygous viable and male and female fertile, as were P[GS]12862/P[EY]00456 transheterozygotes, indicating that the phenotype of P[GS]12862 was not due to CG31989 loss of function. The male fertility defect of P[GS]12862 was uncovered by both Df(2L)cl-h3 and Df(2L)cl-h1 which delete 25D2-3;26B2-5 and 25D4;25F1-2 respectively (tomb is as 25E5). P[GS]12862/Df females were fully fertile, confirming that the male and female fertility defects of P[GS]12862 were separable. Transposase mediated excision of P[GS]12862 resulted in full reversion of the mutant phenotype, indicating that the male sterility is caused by the insertion into tomb.

Phase contrast examination of squash preparations of tombGS12862 homozygous or tombGS12862/Df testes revealed that tomb is a meiotic arrest gene. tomb testes contained morphologically normal stages of spermatogenesis, up to and including mature primary spermatocytes, but no meiotic division or post-meiotic stages (Figure 4A, B).

Figure 4
eGFP-Tomb rescues the tomb meiotic arrest mutant, and localises to chromatin in wild type primary spermatocytes

Tomb protein is concentrated on chromatin in primary spermatocytes

We expressed an EGFP-Tomb fusion protein in primary spermatocytes using a Bam-GAL4-VP16 driver, and found that tagged Tomb protein was able to rescue the meiotic arrest phenotype of tombGS12862 homozygous males, confirming that the expressed protein is functional, and providing final confirmation that the meiotic arrest phenotype is due to loss of tomb function (Figure 4C, D). When expressed in a wild type background EGFP-tagged Tomb protein was initially both nuclear and cytoplasmic (at lower levels) in early primary spermatocytes. In more mature primary spermatocytes EGFP-Tomb was restricted to the nucleus and concentrated on chromatin (Figure 4E-H), three brightly labelled major chromosome bivalents apposed to the nuclear membrane were visible in every nucleus.

tomb is aly-class

aly-class meiotic arrest mutant primary spermatocytes fail to express cyclinB mRNA, while can-class mutants express normal levels of cyclinB mRNA (White-Cooper et al., 1998). tomb mutant testes did not accumulate significant levels of cyclinB mRNA (Figure 5I-L), so tomb is aly-class. RNA in situ hybridisation confirmed that tomb, like all known meiotic arrest genes, is also required for expression of spermatid differentiation genes, for example Mst87F (Figure 5E-H). tomb mutant testes again resembled other meiotic arrest loci in that transcription is not completely blocked, for example they accumulated polo transcripts normally (Figure 5A-D).

Figure 5
tomb is an aly-class meiotic arrest gene

aly-class mutants fall into two sub-groups based on primary spermatocyte DNA morphology (Ayyar et al., 2003; Jiang and White-Cooper, 2003; Lin et al., 1996; Perezgazga et al., 2004). Hoechst 33342 labelling revealed that the tomb DNA chromosomes were somewhat condensed and fuzzy, like aly or comr rather than more condensed and away from the nuclear envelope as seen in achi/vis or topi mutants (Figure 6 A-D'). achi/vis and topi also differ slightly from aly and comr in their target gene specificities (Perezgazga et al., 2004). While all genes that depend on aly or comr for expression also depend on achi/vis and/or topi, there are a few genes, including CG3927 and CG12907, whose transcription depend on achi/vis and topi but not on aly or comr. Several other genes, including CG3330 depend on all the aly-class meiotic arrest genes to some extent for their expression, but differ between aly or comr and achi/vis or topi in that their expression is undetectable in testes from the latter two mutants, but is detected at very low levels in aly or comr testes. The tomb phenotype was indistinguishable from that of aly or comr with respect to expression of CG3927, CG12907 and CG3330 (Figure 6 E-P). Phenotypic comparison data is summarised in Table 1.

Figure 6
tomb is more like aly than topi
Table 1
Summary of phenotypic characteristics of tomb, aly, comr, topi and achi/vis.

Aly, Comr and Topi proteins mis-localise in tomb mutant testes

The tomb phenotype is also more like aly and comr than like achi/vis with respect to Topi localisation. Immunofluorescence revealed that Topi, like the other aly-class meiotic arrest proteins, localises to primary spermatocyte nuclei, and concentrates on chromatin (Figure 7A-C). topi mutant testes showed no staining, confirming the antibody specificity (data not shown). Topi protein was nuclear, but less concentrated on chromatin in aly and comr mutant spermatocytes (Figure 7D-F, comr data not shown), indicating that aly and comr functions are not required for Topi's nuclear localisation or DNA binding per se, but are required for efficient accumulation of Topi onto chromatin. In achi/vis mutants, Topi localisation was similar to wild-type, being nuclear and more concentrated on chromatin. Thus Topi nuclear localisation, and chromatin accumulation are independent of achi/vis function (Figure 7G-I). Topi protein localisation in tomb and aly mutant spermatocytes were indistinguishable (Figure 7J-L). Therefore tomb, like aly and comr, is required for accumulation of Topi protein onto chromatin.

Figure 7
Aly and Topi mislocalise in tombola testes

Aly and Comr proteins both localise to chromatin in wild type primary spermatocytes, however if either gene is mutant the other protein remains cytoplasmic (Jiang and White-Cooper, 2003). In contrast, mutation of achi/vis or topi does not prevent nuclear translocation of Aly and Comr, although these proteins fail to concentrate on chromatin, and show a uniform nuclear localisation in achi/vis or topi mutant spermatocytes (Ayyar et al., 2003; Perezgazga et al., 2004). Immunofluorescence revealed that in tomb mutant spermatocytes Aly and Comr proteins were localised to the nucleus, but were excluded from chromatin (Figure 7 M-R). Therefore tomb function is not required for nuclear import of Aly and Comr, but is required to load these proteins onto chromatin.

Tomb protein requires Aly and Comr for stablility

When expressed in achi/vis (Figure 8A, C), or nht (a can-class meiotic arrest gene, data not shown) mutant testes, EGFP-tagged Tomb protein also localised to primary spermatocyte nuclei. The protein was concentrated on chromatin, but was also found throughout the nucleoplasm. Therefore the functions of achi/vis and the can-class genes are not required to establish or maintain the correct subcellular localisation of Tomb, although they may be required to enhance association of Tomb with chromatin.

Figure 8
Tomb nuclear localisation in late primary spermatocytes depends on comr, but not achi/vis

In contrast, expressed EGFP-Tomb protein localisation was altered when expressed in comr (Figure 8B, D) or aly (data not shown) mutant testes. The fusion protein was able to localise to nuclei, and chromatin, of early primary spermatocytes. However, as spermatocytes matured the nuclear staining was lost, so that in late primary spermatocytes only very weak, cytoplasmic EGFP fluorescence could be detected. We conclude that aly and comr functions are not required for the localisation of Tomb to the nucleus or chromatin per se, but are required to maintain the nuclear concentration of Tomb, by preventing either nuclear export or Tomb degradation.

Discussion

The meiotic arrest genes of Drosophila regulate a developmental transition and associated gene expression switch during which many hundreds of genes whose products are required during sperm formation are upregulated (Andrews et al., 2000; Parisi et al., 2004). Most meiotic arrest genes described to date have been identified through classical genetics. To find additional gene products that act with those already isolated we undertook a reverse genetics approach; we identified tomb while screening for proteins that could bind Aly in a yeast-2-hybrid system.

Pathway of assembly and localisation of an aly-class meiotic arrest complex

The tomb predicted protein contains a tesmin/TSO1 family CXC domain that probably mediates DNA binding. Other tesmin/TSO1 CXC family members have either two full CXC domains, or one truncated domain and one full domain, separated by a conserved spacer. Tomb is exceptional in having a single CXC domain and no spacer sequence. In addition to the CXC domain we identified a second region of homology shared between tomb and the other animal tesmin/TSO1 CXC domain containing proteins. This C-terminal domain has conserved secondary structure, and may be responsible for the Tomb - Aly interaction.

Direct interactions have been demonstrated between Comr and Topi, while Aly, Comr and Achi/Vis have been found in a complex in vivo (Perezgazga et al., 2004; Wang and Mann, 2003). Here we additionally show that Aly and Comr can interact with Tomb. In support of our interaction data, P. Lewis, E. Beall, and M. Botchan have purified a complex of proteins containing Aly, Topi, Comr, Tomb and other factors from Drosophila testes extracts; these components were not detected in ovary specific extracts (Botchen, pers. comm.). The known aly-class meiotic arrest gene products localise primarily on chromatin in wild type primary spermatocytes, although Aly and Tomb are also detected at significant levels in early primary spermatocyte cytoplasm. Only when all 5 aly-class gene products are present is full chromatin binding activity achieved. There are subtle differences in aly and comr phenotypes compared to achi/vis and topi. Most notably, achi/vis and topi have broader ranges of target genes than aly and comr (Perezgazga et al., 2004). We have previously shown that the nuclear localisations of Aly and Comr are mutually dependent, ie Aly remains cytoplasmic in comr mutants, and vice versa (Jiang and White-Cooper, 2003). We have also shown that topi and achi/vis act later in the localisation pathway, both gene products being required for the efficient loading of Aly and Comr to chromatin (Ayyar et al., 2003; Perezgazga et al., 2004). We can now place tomb into the pathway of complex assembly and activity (Figure 9). We propose that Tomb, Achi/Vis and Topi enter the nucleus independently, while Aly and Comr can only become (or remain) nuclear as a complex. Topi and Achi/Vis probably have inherent sequence specific DNA binding activity, which allows them to localise independently, albeit inefficiently, to their targets. Like Mip120, Tomb may also have DNA binding activity. When in the nucleus, Aly and Comr interact with Tomb; this complex then promotes Topi and Achi/Vis interactions with target promoters. Tomb protein is destabilised in the absence of Aly and Comr, hence the phenotypes of tomb, aly and comr mutants, with respect to target gene expression levels, are identical. DRM, a complex containing the C. elegans aly and tomb homologues (lin-9 and lin-54) has recently been described (Harrison et al., 2006). Formation of the DRM complex was sensitive to loss of lin-9 or lin-54, just as aly and tomb are critical for formation of the aly-class gene product complex in testis. Mammalian tesmin is cytoplasmic in early pachytene cells, and normally translocates to the nucleus during late pachytene and diplotene stages of male meiosis, in a similar manner to fly aly and tomb (Matsuura et al., 2002; Sutou et al., 2003).

Figure 9
A model for assembly of the aly-class meiotic arrest proteins at target promoters

Relationship between aly-class meiotic arrest genes and other transcriptional regulators in primary spermatocytes

modulo (mod), Drosophila nucleolin, has recently been implicated in transcriptional activation of spermiogenesis genes (Mikhaylova et al., 2006). mod null mutants are lethal, but a viable weak allele is male sterile. Mod was shown to bind sequence elements in certain testis specific promoters. Many, but not all, mod target genes are also meiotic arrest gene targets. An alternative form of Mod, expressed only in testis, has an acidic N-terminal domain that probably allows Mod to act as a transcriptional activator. The can-class meiotic arrest genes, which encode testis specific homologues of the basal transcription factor complex TFIID (testis TAFs), may activate transcription by sequestering the polycomb repressor complex away from active chromatin, ie they may activate genes by repressing a repressor (Chen et al., 2005; Hiller et al., 2004; Hiller et al., 2001b). In normal primary spermatocytes Pc, and testis TAFs, are primarily nucleolar, although the proteins are also detected uniformly on chromatin. ChIP analysis revealed that Sa protein binds promoters of target genes in primary spermatocytes, suggesting a direct transcriptional activator role for testis TAFs (Chen et al., 2005).

The aly-class meiotic arrest mutant phenotype is most easily explained in terms of transcriptional activation rather than repression of a repressor. The aly-class gene products accumulate on chromatin in primary spermatocytes, in transcriptionally active regions, and not in the nucleolus. Their function depends on the chromatin localisation. In addition, lack of testis TAF gene activity results in low (but readily detectable) levels of target gene expression, while expression of many target genes in aly-class mutant testes is undetectable.

A testis specific dREAM/MybMuv-B complex?

tomb and mip120 (CG6061) are the only Drosophila tesmin/TSO1 CXC motif proteins. Likewise aly and mip130 (twit, EG86E4.4) are the only Drosophila homologues of lin-9 (White-Cooper et al., 1998). Mip120 and Mip130 have been described as components of the dREAM/MybMuv-B complex found in embryos and tissue culture cells (Beall et al., 2002; Korenjak et al., 2004; Lewis et al., 2004). The dREAM complex, in addition to Mip120 and Mip130, contains dMyb, CAF1p55, dDP, Mip40, dE2F2 and RBF1 or RBF2 (Korenjak et al., 2004). The MybMuvB complex was purified independently and contains all the subunits of the dREAM complex as well as several additional proteins including Rpd3, Lin52 and l(3)MBT (Lewis et al., 2004). dREAM/MybMuv-B regulates DNA replication at chorion gene amplification origins in ovarian follicle cells (Beall et al., 2004; Beall et al., 2002; Cayirlioglu et al., 2001; Frolov et al., 2001). In addition to this role in controlling developmentally regulated DNA replication the dREAM/MybMuv-B complex acts as a transcriptional repressor, primarily of genes involved in differentiation (Korenjak et al., 2004; Lewis et al., 2004). This transcriptional repressor role is also developmentally regulated as there are different transcriptional targets for RBF2 and E2F2 in ovaries, early embryos and S2 tissue culture cells (Stevaux et al., 2005).

DRM, a complex containing the C.elegans homologues of the dREAM subunits has recently been described (Harrison et al., 2006). The genes encoding DRM components act together in the SynMuvB genetic pathway that regulates vulval development redundantly with the SynMuvA and SynMuvC pathways (Ceol and Horvitz, 2004; Ceol et al., 2006; Poulin et al., 2005) and references therein; See (Lipsick, 2004) for commentary). All the dREAM/MybMuv-B genes are also conserved to mammals, and recently hLin-9 (hMip130/TWIT), the human homologue of aly/Mip130, has been shown to have tumour suppressor activity and work in concert with Rb to promote differentiation (Gagrica et al., 2004). hMip130/TWIT, hMip120 and hMip40 are all also capable of binding directly to Rb (Korenjak et al., 2004).

Drosophila dE2F2 and RBF2 null mutants are viable and male fertile, but dE2F2 females have reduced fertility (Cayirlioglu et al., 2001; Frolov et al., 2001; Stevaux et al., 2005), while myb, Dp and RBF null mutants are lethal (Duronio et al., 1995; Manak et al., 2002; Royzman et al., 1997) and males mutant for weak Dp alleles are sterile (Duronio et al., 1998), but do not show a meiotic arrest phenotype. Thus mutant phenotypes of the DNA binding subunits dE2F2, RBF, RBF2, Dp and myb are not consistent with them functioning in testes with aly and tomb to activate gene expression. Indeed RBF2 function in ovaries is implicated in repression of some testis specific genes (Stevaux et al., 2005).

There is remarkable evolutionary conservation of the interaction between dREAM/MybMuv-B gene products in somatic tissues in mammals, flies and worms. We suggest that gene duplications in Drosophila of lin-54 (tomb/mip120), lin-9 (aly/mip130) and lin-52 (CG12442/lin52) (JJ, KD and HW-C, unpublished data), has led to the evolution of a complex, paralogous to the dREAM/MybMuvB complex but using different DNA binding subunits, dedicated to testis specific transcriptional regulation.

Acknowledgements

We thank Michael Botchen for critical reading of the manuscript and for communicating results prior to publication; Carine Barreau and Jasmin Kirchner for reading the manuscript and members of the Zoology fly groups, especially Luke Alphey, for helpful discussions throughout this work. The P[GS]12862 line was kindly provided by the Kyoto Drosophila Stock Centre. This work was funded by Wellcome Trust and BBSRC grants to HW-C. EB was supported by an MRC doctoral studentship, HW-C is a Royal Society University Research Fellow.

References

  • Andrews J, Bouffard GG, Cheadle C, Lu JN, Becker KG, Oliver B. Gene discovery using computational and microarray analysis of transcription in the Drosophila melanogaster testis. Genome Research. 2000;10:2030–2043. [PubMed]
  • Ayyar S, Jiang J, Collu A, White-Cooper H, White R. Drosophila TGIF is essential for developmentally regulated transcription in spermatogenesis. Development. 2003;130:2841–2852. [PubMed]
  • Beall EL, Bell M, Georlette D, Botchan MR. Dm-myb mutant lethality in Drosophila is dependent on mip130: positive and negative regulation of DNA replication. Genes & Development. 2004;18:1667–1680. [PubMed]
  • Beall EL, Manak JR, Zhou S, Bell M, Lipsick JS. Role for a Drosophila Myb-containing protein complex in site-specific DNA replication. Nature. 2002;420:833–837. [PubMed]
  • Beitel GJ, Lambie EJ, Horvitz HR. The C. elegans gene lin-9, which acts in an Rb-related pathway, is required for gonadal sheath cell development and encodes a novel protein. Gene. 2000;254:253–263. [PubMed]
  • Cayirlioglu P, Bonnette PC, Dickson M, Duronio RJ. Drosophila E2f2 promotes the conversion from genomic DNA replication to gene amplification in ovarian follicle cells. Development. 2001;128:5085–5098. [PubMed]
  • Ceol CJ, Horvitz HR. A new class of C.elegans synMuv genes implicates a Tip60/NuA4-like HAT complex as a negative regulator of Ras signaling. Dev. Cell. 2004;6:563–576. [PubMed]
  • Ceol CJ, Stegmeier F, Harrison M, Horvitz HR. Identification and classification of genes that act antagonistically to let-60 Ras signaling in Caenorhabditis elegans vulval development. Genetics. 2006;173:709–726. [PubMed]
  • Chen D, McKearin DM. A discrete transcriptional silencer in the bam gene determines asymmetric division of the Drosophila germline stem cell. Development. 2003;130:1159–1170. [PubMed]
  • Chen X, Hiller MA, Sancak Y, Fuller MT. Tissue specific TAFs counteract Polycomb to turn on terminal differentiation. 2005 In prep. [PubMed]
  • Duronio RJ, Bonnette PC, O'Farrell PH. Mutations of the Drosophila dDP, dE2F, and cyclin E genes reveal distinct roles for the E2F-Dp transcription factor and cyclin E during the G1-S transition. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1998;118:141–151. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Duronio RJ, O'Farrell PH, Xie J-E, Brook A, Dyson N. The transcription factor E2F is required for S-phase during Drosophila embryogenesis. Genes and Dev. 1995;9:1456–1468. [PubMed]
  • FlyBase The FlyBase database of the Drosophila genome projects and community literature. Nucleic Acids Research. 1999;27:85–88. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Frolov MH, Huen DS, Stevaux O, Dimova D, Balczarek-Strang K, Elsdon M, Dyson N. Functional antagonism between E2F family members. Genes and Development. 2001;15:2146–2160. [PubMed]
  • Fuller MT. Spermatogenesis. In: Bate M, Martinez-Arias A, editors. The Development of Drosophila. Vol. 1. Cold Spring Harbor, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Press; 1993. pp. 71–147.
  • Gagrica S, Hauser S, Kolfschoten I, Osterloh L, Agami R, Gaubatz S. Inhibition of oncogenic transformation by mammalian Lin-9, a pRB-associated protein. EMBO J. 2004;23:4627–4638. [PubMed]
  • Harrison M, Coel CJ, Lu X, Horvitz HR. Some C. elegans class B synthetic multivulva proteins encode a conserved LIN-35 Rb-containing complex distinct from a NuRD-like complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:16782–16787. [PubMed]
  • Hiller MA, Chen X, Pringle MJ, Suchorolski M, Sancak Y, Viswanathan S, Bolival B, Lin T-Y, Marino S, Fuller MT. Testis-specific TAF homologs collaborate to control a tissue-specific transcription program. Development. 2004;131:5297–5308. [PubMed]
  • Hiller MA, Lin T-Y, Wood C, Fuller MT. Developmental regulation of transcription by a tissue-specific TAF homolog. Genes and Development. 2001a;15:1021–1030. [PubMed]
  • Hiller MA, Lin T-Y, Wood C, Fuller MT. Developmental regulation of transcription by tissue-specific TAF homolog. Genes & Development. 2001b;15:1021–1030. [PubMed]
  • Jayaramaiah Raja S, Renkawitz-Pohl R. Replacement by Drosophila melanogaster protamines and Mst77F of histones during chromatin condensation in late spermatids and role of sesame in the removal of these proteins from the male pronucleus. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2005;25:6165–6177. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Jiang J, White-Cooper H. Transcriptional activation in Drosophila spermatogenesis involves the mutually dependent function of aly and a novel meiotic arrest gene cookie monster. Development. 2003;130:563–573. [PubMed]
  • Kemphues KJ, Raff RA, Kaufman TC, Raff EC. Mutation in a structural gene for a β-tubulin specific to testis in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 1979;76:3991–3995. [PubMed]
  • Korenjak M, Taylor-Harding B, Binne UK, Satterlee JS, Stevaux O, Aasland R, White-Cooper H, Dyson N, Brehm A. Native E2F/RBF complexes contain Myb-interacting proteins and repress transcription of developmentally controlled E2F target genes. Cell. 2004;119:181–193. [PubMed]
  • Lewis PW, Beall EL, Fleischer TC, Georlette D, Link AJ, Botchan M. Identification of a Drosophila Myb-E2F2/RBF transcriptional repressor complex. Genes & Development. 2004;18 [PubMed]
  • Lin T-Y, Viswanathan S, Wood C, Wilson PG, Wolf N, Fuller MT. Coordinate developmental control of the meiotic cell cycle and spermatid differentiation in Drosophila males. Development. 1996;122:1331–1341. [PubMed]
  • Lipsick JS. synMuv verite - Myb comes into focus. Genes & Development. 2004;18:2837–2844. [PubMed]
  • Ma J, Katz E, Belote JM. Expression of proteasome subunit isoforms during spermatogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Insect Molecular Biology. 2002;11:627–639. [PubMed]
  • Manak JR, Mitiku N, Lipsick JS. Mutation of the Drosophila homologue of the Myb protooncogene causes genomic instability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:7438–7443. [PubMed]
  • Matsuura T, Kawasaki Y, Miwa K, Sutou S, Ohinata Y, Yoshida F, Mitsui Y. Germ cell-specific nucleocytoplasmic shuttling protein, tesmin, responsive to heavy metal stress in mouse testes. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2002;88:183–191. [PubMed]
  • McGuffin LJ, Bryson K, Jones DT. The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server. Bioinformatics. 2000;16:404–405. [PubMed]
  • Mikhaylova L, Boutaneav A, Nurminsky DI. Transcriptional regulation by Modulo integrates meiosis and spermatid differentiation in male germ line. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:11975–11980. [PubMed]
  • Olivieri G, Olivieri A. Autoradiographic study of nucleic acid synthesis during spermatogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Mutat. Res. 1965;2:366–380. [PubMed]
  • Parisi M, Nuttall R, Edwards P, Minor J, Naiman D, Lu J, Doctolero M, Vainer M, Chan C, Malley J, et al. A survey of ovary-, testis-, and soma-biased gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster adults. Genome Biol. 2004;5:R40. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Parker L, Gross S, Alphey L. Vectors for the expression of tagged proteins in Drosophila. Biotechniques. 2001;31:1280–1286. [PubMed]
  • Perezgazga L, Jiang J, Bolival B, Hiller MA, Benson E, Fuller MT, White-Cooper H. Regulation of transcription of meiotic cell cycle and terminal differentiation genes by the testis-specific Zn finger protein matotopetli. Development. 2004;131:1691–1702. [PubMed]
  • Poulin G, Dong Y, Fraser A, Hopper N, Ahringer J. Chromatin regulation and sumoylation in the inhibition of Ras-induced vulval development in Caenorhabditis elegans. EMBO J. 2005;24:2613–2623. [PubMed]
  • Royzman I, Whittaker AJ, Orr-Weaver TL. Mutations in Drosophila DP and E2F distinguish G1-S progression from an associated transcriptional program. Genes and Development. 1997;11:1999–2011. [PubMed]
  • Stevaux O, Dimova D, Ji J-Y, Moon NS, Frolov M, Dyson N. Retinoblastoma family 2 is required in vivo for the tissue-specific repression of dE2F2 target genes. Cell Cycle. 2005;4:1272–1280. [PubMed]
  • Sutou S, Miwa K, Matsuura T, Kawasaki Y, Ohinata Y, Mitsui Y. Native tesmin is a 60-kilodalton protein that undergoes dynamic changes in its localisation during spermatogenesis in mice. Biol. Reprod. 2003;68:1861–1869. [PubMed]
  • Toba G, Ohsako T, Miyata N, Ohtsuka T, Seong KH, Aigaki T. The gene search system: A method for efficient detection and rapid molecular identification of genes in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1999;151:725–737. [PubMed]
  • Wang Z, Mann RS. Requirement for two nearly identical TGIF-related homeobox genes in Drosophila spermatogensis. Development. 2003;130:2853–2865. [PubMed]
  • White-Cooper H, Leroy D, MacQueen A, Fuller MT. Transcription of meiotic cell cycle and terminal differentiation genes depends on a conserved chromatin associated protein, whose nuclear localisation is regulated. Development. 2000;127:5463–5473. [PubMed]
  • White-Cooper H, Schafer MA, Alphey LS, Fuller MT. Transcriptional and post-transcriptional control mechanisms coordinate the onset of spermatid differentiation with meiosis I in Drosophila. Development. 1998;125:125–134. [PubMed]