TGF-β
1 family proteins are multifunctional cytokines that have been implicated in the pathogenesis of diverse biologic processes including cell growth and survival, cell and tissue differentiation, development, inflammation, immunity, hematopoiesis, and tissue remodeling and repair. On superficial analysis, TGF-β
1 can be accurately described as a healing molecule that manifests impressive antiinflammatory and fibrotic effects. On closer analysis, it is clear that this perspective is only partially correct and that the effector profile of TGF-β
1 can appear confusing and even contradictory (
23,
25,
38,
39). This is impressively noted in the setting of inflammation where TGF-β
1 has important antiinflammatory and immunosuppressive effects in some settings and proinflammatory effects in others (
38,
40,
41). This is also seen in oncogenesis where TGF-β
1 exerts growth inhibitory effects on tumor cells while enhancing tumor cell migration and invasion (
39). Particularly relevant to the present proposal, are studies that demonstrate that, in the proper setting, TGF-β
1 is essential for wound healing, stimulates matrix molecule deposition and angiogenesis, and is an essential mediator of the pathologic scaring in fibrotic disorders (
16,
22,
38,
42,
43). On the other hand, TGF-β
1 can also induce tissue injury (
44) and cellular apoptosis, decrease epithelialization, and inhibit wound healing (
23–
27). The complexity of these responses can be attributed to a number of items including the state of activation and differentiation of the target cell, the presence of other stimuli in the local microenvironment, and the ability of TGF-β
1 to exert its seemingly antagonistic effects via different effector pathways (
23,
25). The “contradictory” nature of these responses also reflects an inadequate understanding of the mechanisms that TGF-β
1 uses to induce its complex tissue phenotypes. This is due, in part, to the lack of experimental systems in which the acute and chronic effects of TGF-β
1 can be characterized and their interrelationships can be investigated in vivo. It is also due to the assumption that each phenotype is a distinct endpoint in its own right. The possibility that TGF-β
1 may induce one phenotype only if it induces an earlier “different” phenotype has not been considered. As a result, the relationships between endpoints such as apoptosis and fibrosis have not been investigated. To address these deficiencies, we generated and used a novel triple transgenic system that bypasses the fatal lethal effects of TGF-β
1 (
28). With this system, we demonstrated that transgenic TGF-β
1 induces a complex pulmonary phenotype with a transient wave of epithelial apoptosis followed by inflammation, airway and parenchymal fibrosis, myocyte and myofibroblast hyperplasia, and alveolar remodeling. Experiments with these mice defined target genes that mediate these complex responses by highlighting the central role that Egr-1 plays in the TGF-β
1 response. They also illustrate the intimate relationship between apoptosis and fibrosis because three different interventions that blocked apoptosis also ameliorated the TGF-β
1–induced fibrotic response. This suggests that TGF-β
1 simultaneously induces injury (apoptosis) and stimulates fibrosis, and that the injury is required for the fibrosis to occur.
In in vitro studies, TGF-β
1 induces apoptosis in a variety of cells including epithelial cells, T cells, and tumor cells (
45–
47). This apoptosis and TGF-β–mediated growth inhibition can be correlated with the tumor suppressive effects of TGF-β
1 (
45). Apoptosis is also believed to play an important role in normal wound healing because TUNEL staining cells localize in granulation tissue beneath the advancing epithelial edge of dermal wounds (
45), and phagocytic cells produce TGF-β after ingesting apoptotic bodies (
48). However, the role of TGF-β
1 in this apoptotic response has not been defined. In addition, little else is known about the importance of apoptosis in the generation of other TGF-β responses. To define the role of apoptosis in the pathogenesis of the TGF-β
1 tissue phenotype, we compared the kinetics of induction of the different TGF-β
1 responses and the phenotypes induced by transgenic TGF-β
1 when apoptosis was inhibited or proceeding normally. These studies demonstrated that a transient wave of TGF-β
1–induced apoptosis proceeds TGF-β
1–induced tissue fibrosis, and that three different interventions that block this apoptosis (Egr-1 null mutation, Z-VAD-fmk treatment, and selective caspase 3/7 inhibition) markedly ameliorated this fibrotic response. This demonstrates, for the first time, that apoptosis precedes and is an essential prerequisite for TGF-β
1–induced fibrosis. These findings have impressive implications. First, they suggest that the apoptosis at the advancing edge of wounds is required for a normal healing response to occur. Second, they suggest that genetic or acquired alterations in the intensity and/or kinetics of TGF-β
1–induced apoptosis can contribute to the severity, rate of progression, and/or reversibility of fibrotic responses. Lastly, because TGF-β
1, apoptosis, and fibrosis often coexist in diseases like asthma and the ILD (
1–
4,
6,
7,
17–
21,
49), they suggest that interventions that alter apoptosis might be therapeutically useful in controlling tissue fibrosis in these disorders.
Our studies demonstrate that inhibition of apoptosis only ameliorates fibrosis when the therapy is applied during a critical temporal window early in the pathogenesis of a TGF-β
1 tissue response. This finding has important implications regarding the potential usefulness of this sort of an intervention in preventing the progression of pathologic fibrosis. In diseases in which fibrosis is caused by a single insult with a single wave of TGF-β
1, interventions that block early responses such as apoptosis would be expected to ameliorate fibrosis only when given early on or in a prophylactic fashion. In contrast, fibrosis can be caused by multiple temporally dissociated injuries, each of which causes its own wave of TGF-β
1 elaboration. In this scenario, multiple initiation/apoptosis events occur and the clinical impression of disease progression is the result of the sum of each of these discrete injury and repair responses. In this setting, an intervention that blocks apoptosis can block disease initiation or the progression of ongoing disease. Interestingly, there is mounting evidence that multiple temporally discrete injuries contribute to the pathogenesis of diseases such as IPF, asthma, and wound healing. This is nicely illustrated in the exacerbations and remissions that characterize asthma and the ability of apoptotic cells to move with the leading edge of a healing wound (
45). It is also seen in IPF, the histology of which is characterized by geographically discrete sites of injury that appear to be at different stages of evolution and the ready appreciation of apoptotic cells (
5–
7,
50). As a result, we believe apoptosis-based inhibitors can be effective in preventing fibrotic progression in these and other human disorders. Additional experimentation will be needed to test these assumptions.
Egr-1 is an 80–82-kD inducible zinc finger transcription factor that has also been identified as nerve growth factor–induced A, Krox-24, ZIF-268, ETR-103, and TIS-8 (
51–
53). It is the prototype of the Egr family that includes Egr-1, Egr-2, Egr-3, Egr-4, and the Wilms' tumor product. Members of this family have been implicated in commitments to proliferation, differentiation, and the activation of cell death pathways. Egr-1 can be induced, both acutely and chronically, at sites of injury and repair by a variety of stimuli including cytokines, oxidized lipids, angiotensin II, H
2O
2, and mechanical injury (
51–
55). It mediates its effects by regulating the transcription of a wide array of downstream genes involved in inflammation, matrix formation, thrombosis, and remodeling. Prominent targets include the A and B chains of PDGF, fibroblast growth factor 2, vascular endothelial growth factor, CD44, tissue factor, fibronectin, matrix metalloproteinases, plasminogen activator inhibitor 1, and urinary plasminogen activator (
51–
53). In accord with its ability to stimulate TNF, Fas, Fas L, PTEN (a proapoptotic Egr-1 target), and p53, Egr-1 is also a potent stimulator of cellular apoptosis in vitro (
56,
57). Egr-1 can stimulate TGF-β
1 production, be stimulated by TGF-β
1, and inhibit TGF-βRII expression in vitro (
58–
61). Our studies demonstrate that TGF-β
1 stimulates Egr-1 in vivo and that Egr-1 is a central mediator of TGF-β
1–induced apoptosis, fibrosis, and alveolar remodeling in vivo. These observations suggest that therapeutic interventions that control Egr-1 activation or effector pathway initiation can be therapeutically useful in controlling pathologic TGF-β
1 responses. This can be accomplished a variety of ways because Egr-1 is activated via a complex process that involves Egr-1 phosphorylation, Egr-1 specificity protein 1 binding, and competition between Egr-1 and specificity protein 1 for GC-rich cis elements in the promoters of target genes (
62). These findings also have impressive implications for diseases like pulmonary emphysema, which is characterized by structural cell apoptosis, abnormal scarring, TGF-β
1 induction, and Egr-1 activation (
63–
65). In these diseases, it is tempting to speculate that TGF-β
1–induced Egr-1 activation is responsible for the apoptosis, fibrosis, and alveolar destruction in this disorder.
It is commonly stated that fibrosis in the lung is irreversible (
35,
36). This perception is derived from the relentlessly progressive nature of diseases like IPF and from the progressive fibrosis that has been described after high dose virally mediated gene transfer with cytokines such as IL-1β and TGF-β (
66,
67). In contrast, there is a substantial body of evidence in humans and modeling systems that fibrosis, in some settings, can regress over time. This has been most intensely studied in the liver where reversibility is seen in modeling systems and cirrhotic humans after adequate therapy for viral hepatitis (
37,
68). Reversibility has also been reported in patients with isocyanate asthma after cessation of exposure (
69) and in ILD modeling systems using low dose adenovirus-mediated TGF-β
1 gene transfer (
70). Our studies demonstrate that transgenic TGF-β
1 causes a parenchymal fibrotic response that is largely reversible after the cessation of transgene expression. On superficial analysis, these results would appear to differ significantly from the findings that were obtained by Sime et al. (
66) using high dose adenovirus gene transfer of TGF-β
1. These differences could accurately reflect the existence of irreversible and reversible pulmonary fibrotic responses (
68). Alternatively, the differences might be more technical than real because (a) the adenovirus system itself can cause significant lung injury; (b) the high dose adenovirus system engendered levels of BAL TGF-β
1 as high as 90 ng/ml, which is ~60-fold greater than the physiologic levels seen in our system; and (c) the adenovirus TGF-β
1–treated mice were not observed for a significant interval after their peak level of tissue fibrosis, making it impossible to determine if resolution would have occurred with longer periods of evaluation. Regardless, it is clear from our studies that pulmonary fibrosis can resolve over time. Additional experimentation will be required to determine if this reversibility is still seen with higher, longer, or repeated doses of TGF-β
1. Additional experimentation will also be required to test the exciting hypothesis suggested by our apoptosis studies: the degree of reversibility of a TGF-β
1–induced fibrotic response in the lung is determined, at least in part, by the chronicity and/or severity of the preceding epithelial apoptosis.