In the setting of RM infection with pathogenic CCR5-tropic SIV, there is little question that viral replication drives pathogenesis (
16,
28,
29), and that the origin of rapid progression clearly lies in the relatively high levels of viral replication during early infection, most likely resulting from (a) intrinsic host differences in cellular susceptibility to productive infection with the virus in question (
28,
36), (b) host immune factors (
37,
38), and/or (c) concomitant infection (
39,
40). However, some CCR5-tropic SIV-infected RMs can maintain immune homeostasis for long periods despite viral loads as high as, or nearly as high as, rapid progressors ( A), suggesting that high viral replication produces disease (e.g., overt immune deficiency) through differentially regulated host mechanisms. Here, we sought to critically examine the role of CD4
+ T cell depletion in this “downstream” pathogenetic sequence by analyzing in detail the dynamics of this population in rapidly progressive, normally progressive, and non- or slowly progressive SIV infection, as well as a control non-SIV infection, and then determining which, if any, of the dynamic parameters are common to viral infection in general or to SIV infection alone, and of the latter, which are closely linked to early pathogenesis.
The first significant observation is that total CD4
+ T cell depletion is not required for acute pathogenesis, an observation in agreement with other reports demonstrating rapid progression in the absence of severe CD4
+ T cell depletion in blood and lymphoid tissues (
41–
43). The more detailed analyses of this work unambiguously demonstrate that fundamental differences in coreceptor-mediated SIV targeting of the major peripheral CD4
+ T cell subpopulations, naive versus memory, underlie this seemingly incongruous observation. CD4
+ T cell expression of the CCR5 coreceptor is largely restricted to memory T cells, including a relatively small subset in blood and secondary lymphoid tissues, but the vast majority of such cells in tissue effector sites (intestinal lamina propria, vaginal mucosa, lung, liver, skin, and synovium; reference
44). CCR5-tropic SIV selectively depletes this population (this paper and references
13,
33, and 35), and all rapid progressors manifested profound memory depletion before the onset of overt disease. In contrast, naive CD4
+ T cells, which lack CCR5 expression, appear to escape destruction in acute/early CCR5-tropic SIV infection, even with the high viral replication of rapid progressors. Naive cells account for the paradoxical CD4
+ T lymphocytosis associated with rapid progression, and comprise the vast preponderance of the “preserved” CD4
+ T cell compartment (
41) in the lymphoid tissues of rapid progressors found at necropsy (not depicted). Moreover, naive CD4
+ T cells are selectively depleted in (CXCR4-tropic) SIVmac155T3-infected RM; yet, these animals remain healthy as long as memory T cell numbers are maintained (particularly in tissues).
Taken together, these observations implicate the CD4+ memory T cell compartment as a primary participant in SIV pathogenesis. However, when we explicitly asked whether faster and/or greater depletion predicted the accelerated disease course in rapid progressors, we found, somewhat surprisingly, that the rate and extent of CD4+ memory T cell depletion in rapid progressors either overlapped with (total memory T cells in blood) or was only very marginally greater/faster than (CCR5+ CD4+ memory T cells in blood and lung) the lower end of the normal progressor spectrum for the same parameters. Thus, even the relatively reduced viral replication level characteristic of normal progression is frequently sufficient to massively deplete CD4+ memory T cells in tissue, suggesting that although such depletion may ultimately be required for overt immunodeficiency, it is not, by itself, sufficient to trigger its onset. However, one intriguing difference between the CD4+ memory depletion patterns of WT SIVmac239 normal and rapid progressors was observed: the latter cohort showed little or no rebound in CD4+ memory T cell populations after approximately day 42 after infection, suggesting that this subset's regenerative potential might be compromised in the rapid progressors.
Direct analysis of CD4
+ memory T cell dynamics supported this hypothesis. As has been previously reported (
45–
49), SIV infection is associated with a striking increase in CD4
+ memory T cell proliferation (as measured by both Ki-67 expression and in vivo BrdU uptake) and turnover (as measured by BrdU decay), starting ~2–3 wk after infection. This increased memory proliferation and turnover occurred in the absence of overt depletion (e.g., SIVmac239(Δ
nef)-infected RMs) and among CD8
+ cells, suggesting that the primary inciting stimulus for this response is infection-mediated immune stimulation, rather than a homeostatic response to T cell depletion. Moreover, given that high proliferative/high turnover state was strongly manifest in the CD4
+ memory compartment of SIVmac155T3-infected RMs, which almost completely lacked a naive CD4
+ T cell compartment from weeks 2–10 or longer, the increased proliferation/turnover would appear to primarily involve preestablished CD4
+ memory T cells, rather than recent naive to memory converts responding to antigen for the first time. In WT SIVmac239-infected normal progressors, and in all SIVmac239(Δ
nef)- and SIVmac155T3-infected RMs, the increased CD4
+ memory T cell proliferative rates were maintained throughout the entire 200 d of observation. However, although WT SIVmac239-infected rapid progressors initiated the memory T cell proliferative response with similar kinetics, the CD4
+ component uniformly failed in these animals by day 42 after infection (P < 0.0001), and CD4
+ memory T cell proliferative and turnover rates returned to or approached baseline values thereafter.
The potential impact of this CD4
+ memory proliferative collapse on peripheral tissues was revealed by another series of observations. First, as explained in Results, both the kinetics of BrdU labeling of blood, lymph node, and BAL T cells, and the pattern of Ki-67 expression by these labeled cells, firmly establish that the pulmonary tissue–air interface of SIV-infected normal progressors is constantly being seeded by recently divided CD4
+ memory T cells, originating elsewhere (likely organized lymphoid tissues). Thus, SIV infection increases CD4
+ memory T cell proliferation in peripheral lymphoid tissues, producing progeny that directly disperse to extralymphoid effector sites. Because there is both a paucity of Ki-67
high T cells and minimal immediate BrdU uptake by T cells in BALs, these cells do not appear to further proliferate in these sites, but given the rapid decline in BrdU labeling observed in our BAL samples (), likely die in situ, only to be continuously replaced by subsequent rounds of proliferation/migration. Second, in other studies, we have used cytokine flow cytometry and pan-SIV genome consecutive peptide mixes, as well as RhCMV whole viral preps and selected RCMV peptide mixes, to investigate the antigen specificity of the post-SIV infection memory T cell proliferative response. These analyses revealed that total SIV-specific responses could account, at most, for 25% of the postinfection memory T cell proliferating (Ki-67
+ or immediate BrdU
+) subset (usually much less), and that responses to RhCMV were invariably a component of the increased memory T cell proliferative activity (unpublished data). Moreover, we have recently found that provision of IL-15 to uninfected RMs elicits a burst of CD4
+ and CD8
+ memory T cell production and tissue homing similar to that observed in SIV infection (unpublished data), and published reports suggest that IL-7 has related properties (
50–
53), indicating the potential of infection-induced pro-proliferative cytokines to broadly stimulate CD4
+ and CD8
+ memory T cell proliferation. Taken together, these data suggest that the postinfection CD4
+ memory T cell proliferative response is composed of diverse antigen specificities, including cells responsive to opportunistic pathogens.
With this background, a potential linkage between the CD4+ memory T cell proliferative response and rapid progression in CCR5-tropic SIV infection can be proposed. We posit that in the setting of profound CD4+ memory T cell depletion, the increased production and tissue emigration of broadly reactive CD4+ memory T cells are essential for maintenance of immune competence. These cells are short-lived, and with failure of the CD4+ memory T cell proliferative response, their continuous flow into potential effector sites (especially environmental interface tissues such as the lung, gastrointestinal tract mucosa, and skin) ceases, depriving these sites of critically needed immunologic function. In SIVmac239-infected RMs destined for normal progression, even those with profound tissue CD4+ T cell depletion, we demonstrated that BAL CD4+ T cells express either or both CCR5 and Ki-67, consistent with their recent production and migration (the new CCR5+ effector cell influx explaining the apparent paradox of why, in most CCR5-tropic SIV infections, the majority of CD4+ T cells in markedly depleted effector sites still retain CCR5 expression). In sharp contrast, the CD4+ T cells remaining in the BALs of rapid progressors after day 42 after infection (e.g., after the failure of the postinfection proliferative response) were almost all CCR5− and Ki-67−, consistent with a lack of influx of newly produced cells. Although the critical functions provided by these newly produced, short-lived, tissue-homing CD4+ memory T cells remain speculative, the strong mutual correlation between CD4+ memory T cell production (e.g., proliferative failure), BAL CD4+ T cell phenotype, and clinical outcome strongly suggests that the dual loss of preexistent CD4+ memory T cells in tissue and the ability to produce replacements result in local immunodeficiency, setting up such animals for the stochastic occurrence of opportunistic infection.
If loss of tissue-homing, activated CD4
+ memory T cells does, as we suggest, play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of rapid progression, then it follows that normal progressors avoid early pathogenesis by the sustained production of such cells. It is important to note that this CD4
+ memory T cell production response is likely a major component of the persistent immune hyperactivation state that has been associated with chronic pathogenesis in HIV infection (
3–
5). Thus, persistent immune activation might not be solely pathologic. At least for the CD4
+ T cell lineage in the SIV-RM model, its memory T cell production component appears to be critical for the maintenance of immune competence in the face of tissue memory T cell depletion. This benefit might very well be “accidental,” arising from a generalized response to viral infection that evolved for purposes other than offsetting massive CD4
+ T cell destruction. Moreover, continuous high level production of short-lived CD4
+ memory T cells would likely represent only a temporary solution to the ongoing destructive effects of viral replication, and may introduce or exacerbate pathological processes as well. For example, CD4
+ memory T cell hyperproliferation clearly provides a continuous source of new target cells for CCR5-tropic SIV ( A), likely facilitating viral replication and evolution. In addition, the long-term maintenance of markedly increased CD4 and/or CD8
+ memory T cell production/turnover may ultimately result in cellular hypofunctionality and/or deleterious alterations in memory differentiation and repertoire, factors that would contribute to the development of immunodeficiency in chronic infection.
The strong coreceptor dependence of CD4
+ T depletion in acute SIV infection strongly suggests that viral infection, either directly or via CTL-mediated killing, mediates this process. The observation that SIVmac155T3-infected RMs experience a similar elevation of memory T cell activation/turnover as SIVmac239-infected animals, yet preserve BAL CD4
+ memory T cell populations, suggests that indirect killing via activation-induced apoptosis does not play a major role in the early loss of CD4
+ memory T cells in SIVmac239 infections. The CD4
+ memory T cell proliferative failure in SIVmac239-infected rapid progressors may have a similar origin. Sustained high viral replication might directly destroy proliferating CD4
+ CCR5
+ memory T cells and/or their immediate precursors or progeny, leaving their CD8
+ counterparts intact. It is noteworthy, however, that (a) the CD4
+ memory T cell proliferative response does initiate in rapid progressors in the face of very high viral replication; (b) not all the proliferating/high turnover cells are CCR5
+; (c) the fate of these cells in acute infection, as determined by BrdU labeling decay, appears to be no different than the fate of similarly labeled cells in normal progressors ( B); and (d) the collapse of CD4
+ memory T cell proliferation in rapid progression is not total, as a relatively long-lived CD4
+ memory proliferative component remains intact ( and C). These observations suggest mechanisms other than overwhelming, direct, virus-mediated destruction might also be operative; perhaps a concomitant destruction of supporting lymphoid microenvironments (e.g., IL-15– or IL-7–producing macrophages/stromal cells). Given the relative preservation of the CD8
+ memory and long-lived CD4
+ memory T cell proliferative compartments in rapid progressors, this mechanism would entail an increased sensitivity of the short-lived, tissue-homing CD4
+ memory compartment to the putative microenvironmental defect (
4). The relative contribution of these mechanisms and whether the operative mechanisms are reversible with viral suppression or immunotherapy (e.g., provision of pro-proliferative cytokines) remains to be determined in future studies.
Rapid progression is relatively uncommon in human HIV infection (
54), and thus, the applicability of these findings to the pathogenesis of most human AIDS cases remains uncertain. However, the immune deficiency syndrome manifest by our rapid progressor RM is highly analogous to human AIDS (
1,
2,
55), and our data unequivocally demonstrate that such a clinical state can be strongly associated with the combination of profound mucosal CD4
+ memory T cell depletion and loss of an apparently compensating, infection-associated proliferative response. These findings persuasively argue that tissue CD4
+ memory/effector T cell dynamics can be a key arbitrator of progressive disease. In addition, the CD4 memory T cell depletion and hyperproliferation/turnover initiated in acute infection almost certainly has a prolonged impact on immune physiology thereafter, and thus our results provide a framework for further analysis of chronic phase T cell memory dynamics in SIV-infected monkeys that escape rapid progression. As evidence is accumulating that mucosal CD4
+ memory T cell depletion and increased CD4
+ memory T cell proliferation and turnover also occur in HIV infection (
3,
4,
56–
60), it is highly likely that the mechanisms operating in SIV-infected RMs will have many direct parallels in human AIDS.