Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of jcellbiolHomeThe Rockefeller University PressEditorsContactInstructions for AuthorsThis issue
J Cell Biol. 1995 August 2; 130(4): 941–948.
PMCID: PMC2199954

The checkpoint delaying anaphase in response to chromosome monoorientation is mediated by an inhibitory signal produced by unattached kinetochores


During mitosis in Ptk1 cells anaphase is not initiated until, on average, 23 +/- 1 min after the last monooriented chromosome acquires a bipolar attachment to the spindle--an event that may require 3 h (Rieder, C. L., A. Schultz, R. W. Cole, and G. Sluder. 1994. J. Cell Biol. 127:1301-1310). To determine the nature of this cell-cycle checkpoint signal, and its site of production, we followed PtK1 cells by video microscopy prior to and after destroying specific chromosomal regions by laser irradiation. The checkpoint was relieved, and cells entered anaphase, 17 +/- 1 min after the centromere (and both of its associated sister kinetochores) was destroyed on the last monooriented chromosome. Thus, the checkpoint mechanism monitors an inhibitor of anaphase produced in the centromere of monooriented chromosomes. Next, in the presence of one monooriented chromosome, we destroyed one kinetochore on a bioriented chromosome to create a second monooriented chromosome lacking an unattached kinetochore. Under this condition anaphase began in the presence of the experimentally created monooriented chromosome 24 +/- 1.5 min after the nonirradiated monooriented chromosome bioriented. This result reveals that the checkpoint signal is not generated by the attached kinetochore of a monooriented chromosome or throughout the centromere volume. Finally, we selectively destroyed the unattached kinetochore on the last monooriented chromosome. Under this condition cells entered anaphase 20 +/- 2.5 min after the operation, without congressing the irradiated chromosome. Correlative light microscopy/elctron microscopy of these cells in anaphase confirmed the absence of a kinetochore on the unattached chromatid. Together, our data reveal that molecules in or near the unattached kinetochore of a monooriented PtK1 chromosome inhibit the metaphase-anaphase transition.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.8M).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Ault JG, Nicklas RB. Tension, microtubule rearrangements, and the proper distribution of chromosomes in mitosis. Chromosoma. 1989 Jun;98(1):33–39. [PubMed]
  • Bernat RL, Delannoy MR, Rothfield NF, Earnshaw WC. Disruption of centromere assembly during interphase inhibits kinetochore morphogenesis and function in mitosis. Cell. 1991 Sep 20;66(6):1229–1238. [PubMed]
  • Berns MW. The laser microbeam as a probe for chromatin structure and function. Methods Cell Biol. 1978;18:277–294. [PubMed]
  • Berns MW, Aist J, Edwards J, Strahs K, Girton J, McNeill P, Rattner JB, Kitzes M, Hammer-Wilson M, Liaw LH, et al. Laser microsurgery in cell and developmental biology. Science. 1981 Jul 31;213(4507):505–513. [PubMed]
  • Berns MW, Wright WH, Wiegand Steubing R. Laser microbeam as a tool in cell biology. Int Rev Cytol. 1991;129:1–44. [PubMed]
  • Brenner SL, Liaw LH, Berns MW. Laser microirradiation of kinetochores in mitotic PtK2 cells: chromatid separation and micronucleus formation. Cell Biophys. 1980 Jun;2(2):139–152. [PubMed]
  • Campbell MS, Gorbsky GJ. Microinjection of mitotic cells with the 3F3/2 anti-phosphoepitope antibody delays the onset of anaphase. J Cell Biol. 1995 Jun;129(5):1195–1204. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Cassimeris L, Rieder CL, Rupp G, Salmon ED. Stability of microtubule attachment to metaphase kinetochores in PtK1 cells. J Cell Sci. 1990 May;96(Pt 1):9–15. [PubMed]
  • Desai A, Mitchison TJ. A new role for motor proteins as couplers to depolymerizing microtubules. J Cell Biol. 1995 Jan;128(1-2):1–4. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Earnshaw WC, Mackay AM. Role of nonhistone proteins in the chromosomal events of mitosis. FASEB J. 1994 Sep;8(12):947–956. [PubMed]
  • Earnshaw WC, Bernat RL, Cooke CA, Rothfield NF. Role of the centromere/kinetochore in cell cycle control. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1991;56:675–685. [PubMed]
  • Gorbsky GJ, Ricketts WA. Differential expression of a phosphoepitope at the kinetochores of moving chromosomes. J Cell Biol. 1993 Sep;122(6):1311–1321. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hartwell LH, Weinert TA. Checkpoints: controls that ensure the order of cell cycle events. Science. 1989 Nov 3;246(4930):629–634. [PubMed]
  • Hays TS, Salmon ED. Poleward force at the kinetochore in metaphase depends on the number of kinetochore microtubules. J Cell Biol. 1990 Feb;110(2):391–404. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Li X, Nicklas RB. Mitotic forces control a cell-cycle checkpoint. Nature. 1995 Feb 16;373(6515):630–632. [PubMed]
  • Liang H, Wright WH, Rieder CL, Salmon ED, Profeta G, Andrews J, Liu Y, Sonek GJ, Berns MW. Directed movement of chromosome arms and fragments in mitotic newt lung cells using optical scissors and optical tweezers. Exp Cell Res. 1994 Jul;213(1):308–312. [PubMed]
  • Marko M, Leith A, Parsons D. Three-dimensional reconstruction of cells from serial sections and whole-cell mounts using multilevel contouring of stereo micrographs. J Electron Microsc Tech. 1988 Aug;9(4):395–411. [PubMed]
  • McIntosh JR. Structural and mechanical control of mitotic progression. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1991;56:613–619. [PubMed]
  • McNeill PA, Berns MW. Chromosome behavior after laser microirradiation of a single kinetochore in mitotic PtK2 cells. J Cell Biol. 1981 Mar;88(3):543–553. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Murray A. Cell cycle checkpoints. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1994 Dec;6(6):872–876. [PubMed]
  • Nicklas RB, Ward SC. Elements of error correction in mitosis: microtubule capture, release, and tension. J Cell Biol. 1994 Sep;126(5):1241–1253. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Rattner JB, Berns MW. Light and electron microscopy of laser microirradiated chromosomes. J Cell Biol. 1974 Aug;62(2):526–533. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Rieder CL. Thick and thin serial sectioning for the three-dimensional reconstruction of biological ultrastructure. Methods Cell Biol. 1981;22:215–249. [PubMed]
  • Rieder CL. The formation, structure, and composition of the mammalian kinetochore and kinetochore fiber. Int Rev Cytol. 1982;79:1–58. [PubMed]
  • Rieder CL. Formation of the astral mitotic spindle: ultrastructural basis for the centrosome-kinetochore interaction. Electron Microsc Rev. 1990;3(2):269–300. [PubMed]
  • Rieder CL, Salmon ED. Motile kinetochores and polar ejection forces dictate chromosome position on the vertebrate mitotic spindle. J Cell Biol. 1994 Feb;124(3):223–233. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Rieder CL, Davison EA, Jensen LC, Cassimeris L, Salmon ED. Oscillatory movements of monooriented chromosomes and their position relative to the spindle pole result from the ejection properties of the aster and half-spindle. J Cell Biol. 1986 Aug;103(2):581–591. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Rieder CL, Schultz A, Cole R, Sluder G. Anaphase onset in vertebrate somatic cells is controlled by a checkpoint that monitors sister kinetochore attachment to the spindle. J Cell Biol. 1994 Dec;127(5):1301–1310. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Roos UP. Light and electron microscopy of rat kangaroo cells in mitosis. I. Formation and breakdown of the mitotic apparatus. Chromosoma. 1973;40(1):43–82. [PubMed]
  • Sluder G, Miller FJ, Thompson EA, Wolf DE. Feedback control of the metaphase-anaphase transition in sea urchin zygotes: role of maloriented chromosomes. J Cell Biol. 1994 Jul;126(1):189–198. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Tomkiel J, Cooke CA, Saitoh H, Bernat RL, Earnshaw WC. CENP-C is required for maintaining proper kinetochore size and for a timely transition to anaphase. J Cell Biol. 1994 May;125(3):531–545. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press