PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of bmjThis ArticleThe BMJ
 
BMJ. 2008 January 12; 336(7635): 61.
Published online 2008 January 8. doi:  10.1136/bmj.39455.498600.4E
PMCID: PMC2190280

Tooke report proposes a new body to get postgraduate medical training back on track

England needs a new body to oversee and champion postgraduate medical education to overcome the “many deficiencies” of the Modernising Medical Careers (MMC) programme, recommends the inquiry into the failed attempt to reform junior doctors’ training.

A new body would be key to ensuring that specialist training in England gets back on track, says the report. It should be “rapidly formed to redefine the guiding principles that should govern the nature and conduct of postgraduate medical education and training in the future”—something that MMC lacked, it says.

The final report of John Tooke’s inquiry says that the new body, which would be called NHS Medical Education England, should have ringfenced funding and be outside the control of the Department of Health.

The inquiry was ordered in April 2007 by the then health secretary, Patricia Hewitt, after one of the programme’s main components—the centralised electronic recruitment system called the medical training applications service (MTAS)—collapsed in chaos. On top of this, some 30 000 junior doctors were left chasing after some 20 000 training posts.

The final report makes 47 recommendations on how the attempt to reform postgraduate medical education can be saved.

It blames “weak DH [Department of Health] policy development, implementation, and governance together with poor inter- and intra-Departmental links” and the medical profession’s “ineffective involvement” for the failure of MMC.

Most of the recommendations in the final report from Sir John, dean of the Peninsula Medical School in Plymouth, were outlined in his interim report published in October (BMJ 2007;335:737 doi: 10.1136/bmj.39363.596273.59). These included calls for MTAS to be scrapped. The interim report also recommended that the General Medical Council take over the work of the Postgraduate Medical Education Training Board and called for better definition of the roles of doctors at different stages of their careers, both of which are retained in the final report.

A six week consultation period elicited 39 850 email responses, of which 87% agreed or strongly agreed with the interim report’s recommendations.

The final report has two additional recommendations, one for a national body for England and one for a “more flexible” approach to implementing the European Working Time Directive, which comes into force in full next year. It says that the Department of Health should explore contractual solutions that would prevent any further reductions in the time that junior doctors spend gaining clinical experience—for example, by separating service and educational contracts.

The report concludes, “The Inquiry has charted a way forward and received a strong professional mandate. The Recommendations and the aspiration to excellence they represent must not be lost in translation. [NHS Medical Education England] will help assure their implementation.”

The strongest criticism in the interim report related to the proposals to change the foundation programme. The final report says that the two years of the foundation programme need to be split to clear the legal barriers that currently prevent UK medical graduates from being guaranteed a preregistration post. Year 2 of the foundation programme should be abolished and its best elements integrated into three years of “core training.” Candidates for core training will be selected by means of local interviews, not—as originally proposed—by taking an examination, Sir John told the BMJ in an interview (www.bmj.com/audio/index.dtl).

What NHS Medical Education England would do

  • Hold the ringfenced budget for medical education and training in England
  • Define the principles underpinning postgraduate medical education and training
  • Represent trainee doctors’ interests when new policies are being developed and implemented
  • Develop better planning nationally on training numbers
  • Ensure that policy and professional and service perspectives are integrated into postgraduate curriculums
  • Coordinate advice to government on matters relating to medical education
  • Promote the national cohesion of postgraduate deanery activities
  • Scrutinise the functions of strategic health authorities in relation to commissioning training
  • Commission certain subspecialty medical training
  • Act as the governance body for Modernising Medical Careers and future training
  • Work with equivalent bodies in the UK devolved administrations to promote UK-wide cohesion of training

Notes

Aspiring to Excellence: Final Report of the Independent Inquiry into Modernising Medical Careers is available at www.mmcinquiry.org.uk.

For further comments see News doi: 10.1136/bmj.39455.523090.DB. See also Editorial doi: 10.1136/bmj.39455.385868.80. You can listen to the BMJ’s interview with John Tooke at www.bmj.com/audio/index.dtl.


Articles from The BMJ are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group