Anterograde axonal transport of the cytoskeleton has been studied using a variety of experimental systems both in vivo and in cultured cells (for reviews see
Baas and Brown 1997;
Hirokawa et al. 1997;
Nixon 1998). These include monitoring the movement of radiolabeled proteins (
Reinsch et al. 1991;
de Waegh et al. 1992;
Lasek et al. 1992;
Archer et al. 1994;
Nixon et al. 1994b;
Collard et al. 1995;
Campenot et al. 1996;
Zhang et al. 1997;
Williamson and Cleveland 1999), the use of fluorescently labeled cytoskeletal proteins, and photoactivation and photobleaching techniques (
Keith 1987;
Okabe and Hirokawa 1992,
Okabe and Hirokawa 1993;
Okabe et al. 1993;
Takeda et al. 1994,
Takeda et al. 1995;
Sabry et al. 1995;
Funakoshi et al. 1996;
Miller and Joshi 1996;
Yu et al. 1996), analyses of cytoskeletal accumulation after physical constriction of axons (
Koehnle and Brown 1999), and, finally, studies of labeled cytoskeletal proteins introduced into neurons using recombinant DNA methodologies (
Terada et al. 1996;
Yabe et al. 1999;
Wang et al. 2000). The new method that we describe here complements these existing techniques and offers certain advantages. First, it can be applied to any cytoskeletal protein whose properties are not influenced by tagging with EGFP. Second, since it involves transfection of cytoskeletal cDNAs, analyses of mutants and the effect of overexpression of other proteins that might influence transport by cotransfection methods are possible. Third, the effects that various physiological agents have on slow axonal transport are easily studied (such as we have described here with glutamate and glutamate receptor antagonists). Finally, the method is not technically demanding and is simple to perform; the fluorescent front is discrete and easily observed and the error bars for distance traveled by EGFP-NF-M are small and this testifies to the quality of the data. Thus, our method is simple and robust.
In vivo, neurofilament transport rates vary between ~10–125 μm/h depending on the type of neuron, age of the animal, and location within the axon (
Lee and Cleveland 1996;
Baas and Brown 1997;
Hirokawa et al. 1997;
Nixon 1998). However, recent cellular studies have shown that neurofilaments travel at fast transport rates (up to 2.3 μm/s), but that this movement is interrupted by prolonged pauses (
Wang et al. 2000). Therefore, only a proportion of neurofilaments are moving at any one time (estimated as 1–15%), such that an overall slow transport rate is observed. Since we analyzed EGFP-NF-M movement in cells fixed at 20-min intervals rather than in living cells, our assays calculate this overall slow transport rate. In the cortical cells used, this is 80 ± 2 μm/h, which is consistent with the known rates of transport as assayed in vivo by other methods.
The events that lead to cell death in these neurodegenerative diseases are not known, but excitotoxic mechanisms involving glutamate have been suggested to be part of the disease process for both ALS (for reviews see
Shaw 1994;
Rothstein 1996) and Alzheimer's disease (
Guo et al. 1999). Indeed, a loss of the glial glutamate transporter (EAAT2) has been described in sporadic forms of ALS (
Lin et al. 1998) and in a transgenic mouse model of ALS (
Bruijn et al. 1997). Moreover, mutant SOD1s, which cause familial forms of ALS, induce selective damage to EAAT2 by oxidative mechanisms (
Trotti et al. 1999); uptake of glutamate via sodium-dependent glutamate transporters is a primary mechanism for inactivation of extracellular glutamate. Thus, glutamate-induced excitotoxicity might be part of the pathogenic process in several neurodegenerative diseases. Our finding that glutamate inhibits anterograde axonal transport of NF-M, therefore, provides a mechanism to link excitotoxicity with neurofilament accumulation in these disorders.
The series of molecular events by which glutamate exposure might lead to a slowing of neurofilament transport are not clear. However, increased phosphorylation of NF-M and NF-H side-arm domains has been associated with slower neurofilament transport rates in many studies (
Watson et al. 1989a,
Watson et al. 1989b,
Watson et al. 1991;
Archer et al. 1994;
Nixon et al. 1994a,
Nixon et al. 1994b;
Jung and Shea 1999). Therefore, it is notable that we observe an increase in neurofilament side-arm phosphorylation in cell bodies after glutamate treatment. Other studies have shown that glutamate can cause increased neurofilament side-arm phosphorylation in neurons (
Asahara et al. 1999;
Brownlees et al. 2000). NF-M and NF-H side-arms are more heavily phosphorylated in axons than cell bodies (
Julien and Mushynski 1982;
Sternberger and Sternberger 1983;
Carden et al. 1985;
Lee et al. 1987,
Lee et al. 1988;
Nixon et al. 1994b), and so it is also possible that changes to neurofilament phosphorylation occurred in neurites but were not so easily detectable. Glutamate is known to activate members of the MAPK family including p42/p44MAPK and SAPKs (
Bading and Greenberg 1991;
Kurino et al. 1995;
Xia et al. 1996;
Schwarzschild et al. 1997,
Schwarzschild et al. 1999;
Brownlees et al. 2000), and we demonstrate that this is also the case in the cortical neurons used here. p42/p44MAPK and SAPK1b/c will all phosphorylate NF-M/NF-H side-arms (
Giasson and Mushynski 1996,
Giasson and Mushynski 1997;
Veeranna et al. 1998;
Li et al. 1999;
Brownlees et al. 2000; data shown here), and we show that the active forms of these kinases are present in cell bodies in the glutamate-treated neurons. Together, these observations suggest that these particular kinases are the link between glutamate and increased neurofilament phosphorylation.
Thus, activation of p42/p44MAPK and SAPKs, and phosphorylation of NF-M/NF-H side-arms might be at least part of the process by which glutamate causes a slowing of neurofilament transport in the cortical neurons used here. Whether the same processes occur in other neuronal cell types including lower motor neurons remains to be established. However, other possible mechanisms including glutamate-induced alterations to the neurofilament transport motor, which has to date not been identified, or the way in which neurofilaments attach to the motor, which is again not known (
Brady 2000), cannot be excluded. Indeed, one recent suggestion is that NF-M/NF-H side-arm phosphorylation regulates association of neurofilaments with kinesin, a fast motor (
Yabe et al. 2000). Whatever the precise mechanism, the results presented here are the first to show a link between glutamate excitotoxicity, a proposed pathogenic process for several human neurodegenerative diseases, and slowing of neurofilament transport, which is a pathological feature in at least some of these disorders.