PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of wtpaEurope PMCEurope PMC Funders GroupSubmit a Manuscript
 
Development. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 January 8.
Published in final edited form as:
Published online 2007 January 31. doi:  10.1242/dev.02775
PMCID: PMC2176081
EMSID: UKMS1326

cAMP production by adenylyl cyclase G induces prespore differentiation in Dictyostelium slugs

SUMMARY

Encystation and sporulation are crucial developmental transitions for solitary and social amoebas, respectively. While little is known of encystation, sporulation requires both extra- and intracellular cAMP. After aggregation of social amoebas, extracellular cAMP binding to surface receptors and intracellular cAMP binding to cAMP dependent protein kinase (PKA) act together to induce prespore differentiation. Later, a second episode of PKA activation triggers spore maturation. Adenylyl cyclase B (ACB) produces cAMP for maturation, but the cAMP source for prespore induction is unknown. We show that adenylyl cyclase G (ACG) protein is upregulated in prespore tissue after aggregation. acg null mutants show reduced prespore differentiation, which becomes very severe when ACB is also deleted. ACB is normally expressed in prestalk cells, but is upregulated in the prespore region of acg null structures. These data show that ACG induces prespore differentiation in wild-type cells, with ACB capable of partially taking over this function in its absence.

Keywords: pattern formation, cell-type specification, sporulation, encystation, adenylyl cyclase G, Dictyostelium discoideum

INTRODUCTION

Encystation and sporulation are common life cycle transitions that allow protists, fungi and lower plants to survive nutrient depletion and other forms of stress. Little is known about the signalling pathways that control encystation, which in the case of pathogenic protists is of significant medical importance. For instance for Entamoeba histolytica, which causes the second most lethal parasite borne disease, amebiasis, the cyst is the infective stage of the disease (Stanley, 2003). Infections with Acanthamoeba castellani, that cause keratitis and amoebic encephalitis, are difficult to treat because the amoebas differentiate into highly resistant cysts inside host tissues. (Lloyd et al., 2001; Marciano-Cabral and Cabral, 2003; McClellan et al., 2002). Mainly due to lack of genetic tools to investigate this process, little is known of the signalling pathways that control encystation.

Social amoebas respond to nutrient stress by either encysting individually or by aggregating to form fruiting structures, where most of the cells differentiate into spores. A small proportion of cells altruistically build a stalk to support the spore mass and to aid in their dispersal. Particularly the species D.discoideum has excellent genetic tractability, and the pathways that control sporulation have been extensively studied. Here, sporulation involves a first phase, prespore differentiation that occurs shortly after aggregation. In this stage the cells synthesize spore-coat components in prespore vesicles, but remain otherwise amoeboid. Prespore differentiation is triggered by extracellular cAMP acting on cAMP receptors (cARs), and intracellular cAMP acting on PKA (Schaap and Van Driel, 1985; Hopper et al., 1993). The second phase, spore maturation, occurs after the stalk is formed and this process is triggered solely by a high level of PKA activity (Mann et al., 1994). Spore maturation involves relatively minor changes in gene expression, but is accompanied by major physiological changes: prespore vesicles fuse with the plasma membrane, laying down the first layers of the spore coat and releasing precursors for synthesis of the outer layers (West and Erdos, 1990).

PKA activation during spore maturation requires the activity of the adenylyl cyclase ACB, encoded by AcrA, which is maximally expressed at the fruiting body stage (Kim et al., 1998; Meima and Schaap, 1999; Soderbom et al., 1999). In addition, the process requires inactivation of the intracellular cAMP phosphodiesterase, RegA. This unusual enzyme harbours a response regulator domain which is the target of a phosphorelay system that is regulated by sensor histidine kinases/phosphatases (Shaulsky et al., 1996; Shaulsky et al., 1998; Thomason et al., 1998; Thomason et al., 1999). A peptide released by stalk cells, SDF-2, activates the sensor histidine phosphatase DhkA, causing dephosphorylation and hence inactivation of RegA. This in turn causes cAMP accumulation and the activation of PKA (Anjard and Loomis, 2005; Wang et al., 1999). PKA remains important in the spore stage, where it controls spore dormancy. The ambient high osmolality in the spore head keeps the spores dormant, and this effect is mediated by the adenylyl cyclase ACG, which harbours an intramolecular osmosensor (Saran and Schaap, 2004; Van Es et al., 1996; Virdy et al., 1999).

The requirements of ACB and ACG for PKA activation in spore maturation and dormancy are well documented. However, it is not clear which enzyme produces the extracellular cAMP that triggers prespore differentiation. The third Dictyostelium adenylyl cyclase, ACA, is mainly active during aggregation and disappears from the prespore region once slugs start to form (Pitt et al., 1992; Verkerke-van Wijk et al., 2001). Null mutants in ACB/AcrA show normal prespore gene expression (Soderbom et al., 1999) and ACG mRNA was only detectable in spores (Pitt et al., 1992). However, biochemical analysis of adenylyl cyclase activities in aca- slugs demonstrated the presence of an adenylyl cyclase activity, which similar to ACG, preferred Mn2+-ATP over Mg2+-ATP as a substrate. Since the reverse is true for ACB, this suggested that ACG could be expressed in slugs (Meima and Schaap, 1999).

In this work we analysed the pattern of ACG transcription and translation more closely by studies with ACG promoter-reporter gene fusions and an ACG specific antibody. Our data indicate that ACG is transcribed at low levels throughout development, while ACG protein is markedly upregulated after aggregation in the prespore regions of slugs. Analysis of single and double null mutants in ACG and ACB indicates that ACG is essential for prespore differentiation, but that its function is partially redundant with ACB. This work complements parallel studies where we show that ACG is deeply conserved in amoebazoan evolution and regulates encystation and excystation in analogy to its roles in spore formation and germination.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell culture and development

D.discoideum cells were grown in standard axenic medium, which was supplemented with antibiotics as indicated. To induce multicellular development cells were harvested from exponentially growing cultures, washed twice in PB (10 mM Na/K-phosphate buffer pH 6.5) and incubated at 22°C on PB agar (1.5% agar in PB). To induce competence for prespore gene induction, cells were starved on PB agar for 16 hours at 6°C and 2 hours at 22°C until aggregation territories had formed. Cells were then resuspended to 2×106 cells/ml in PB and shaken at 150 rpm and 22°C in the presence and absence of cAMP.

Gene constructs and transformation

Fusion constructs of the ACG promoter were made with the LacZ (gal) reporter gene and with a modified LacZ, called ile-gal. In ile-gal, LacZ is modified by N-terminal addition of the ubiquitin gene and replacement of the LacZ start codon with an isoleucine codon. The ubiquitin moiety is cleaved off during translation, leaving β-galactosidase with an exposed isoleucin, which decreases protein stability to a half-life of 30 minutes (Detterbeck et al., 1994). For both constructs, 2855 bp of ACG DNA sequence, comprising 2810 bp of the complete 5′ intergenic region and 45 bp of coding sequence, were amplified from vector pGACG (Pitt et al., 1992) using primers ACGpr5′ and ACGpr3′ (Table 1), which harbour XbaI and BglII sites respectively. After digestion with XbaI and BglII, the amplified product was cloned into XbaI/BglII digested pDdGal-17 (Harwood and Drury, 1990) to create ACG::gal, and used to replace the XbaI/BglII psA promoter fragment from vector psA-ile-gal (Detterbeck et al., 1994) to generate ACG::ile-gal. The vectors were introduced into AX3 cells and acrA- mutants by electroporation and transformants were selected for growth at 100 μg/ml G418 for ACG::gal and at 200 μg/ml for the ACG::ile-gal constructs.

Table 1
Oligonucleotides used in this work

Gene fusions of the AcrA promoter with labile ile-gal and stable ala-gal (Detterbeck et al., 1994) were made by amplification of the 819 bp AcrA 5′intergenic region from AX2 genomic DNA with primers AcrApr5′ and AcrApr3′, containing XbaI and BglII restriction sites (Table 1). The amplifed product was inserted into both the ile-gal and ala-gal vector as described above to create AcrA-ile-gal and AcrA-ala-gal. Both vectors were introduced into AX2 and acg- cells. Transformants were selected for growth at 100 μg/ml G418.

To prepare an ACG gene disruption construct, two DNA fragments of the acgA gene comprising nucleotides 29-922 and 1761-2184 were amplified by PCR from vector pGACG (Pitt et al., 1992), using oligonucleotides AcgKO1-4 (table 1) that add a 5′-BamHI and 3′-KpnI site to the first fragment and a 5′-XbaI and 3′-BamHI site to the second fragment. These fragments were cloned sequentially into BamHI/KpnI digested and XbaI/BamHI digested pBsrΔBam (Sutoh, 1993). The construct was linearized with BamHI, which yielded the pBsrΔBam plasmid flanked by 894 bp and 423 bp of 5′ and 3′ AcgA sequence respectively, and introduced into wild-type AX2 cells. Transformed cells were selected for growth at 5 μg/ml blasticidin and selected clones were screened for homologous recombination by two separate PCR reactions and analysis of Southern blots of genomic digests.

Histochemical and spectrophotometric β-galactosidase assays

For visualization of β-galactosidase activity in developing structures, cells were distributed at 107 cells/cm2 on nitrocellulose filters supported by PB agar and incubated at 22°C. Structures were fixed in 0.25% glutaraldehyde, containing 2% Tween-20 and stained with X-gal as described previously (Dingermann et al., 1989).

For spectrophotometric measurement of β-galactosidase activity, cells were lysed by freeze-thawing and 100 μl aliquots of lysate were incubated at 22°C in microtiterplate wells with 30 μl of 2.5 × Z-buffer and 20 μl of 40 mM chlorophenolred-β-D-galactopyranoside (Schaap et al., 1993). The OD574 was measured at regular time intervals using a microtiter plate reader β-galactosidase activity in ΔOD574/minute was calculated from the time intervals where reaction product accumulated linearly and was standardized on the protein content of the samples. The activity observed in untransformed cells was subtracted as the assay blanc.

Immunological techniques

For immuno-blotting, samples of 2×107 cells were pelleted and boiled in 50 μl SDS sample buffer. 50 μg samples of total protein were size-fractionated on 8% SDS-PAA gels and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were incubated overnight at 4°C with a 1:2000 dilution of an αACG peptide antibody (Saran and Schaap, 2004), washed and incubated with 1:2000 diluted horse radish peroxidase-coupled goat-anti-rabbit antibody (Promega, USA). Detection was performed with the Supersignal chemoluminescence kit (Pierce, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

For immuno-cytochemistry, slugs were harvested in 20 mM EDTA in PB and dissociated into single cells by passing through a 23 gauge needle. Cells were placed as 10 μl aliquots of 107 cells/ml on 8-well multitest slides, overlayed with agarose (Fukui et al., 1986) and fixed for 10 minutes in ice-cold methanol. Slides were incubated overnight with 1:500 diluted αACG antibody, and with 1:200 diluted FITC-conjugated goat-anti-rabbit IgG (GARFITC) for 1 hr. Subsequently cells were incubated for 1 hr with a 1:500 diluted mouse monoclonal antibody 83.5 (Zhang et al., 1999) and for 1 hr with 1:500 diluted Texas Red-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG. Spores were harvested from fruiting bodies and stained with αACG antibody and GARFITC.

For whole mount immuno-staining, intact structures were gently floated from an inverted slice of supporting agar to 10 μl PB deposited in the wells of polylysine coated 8-well multitest slides. The fluid was aspirated and the structures were fixed in methanol and incubated with αACG antibody and GARFITC as described above. Preparations were photographed using a Leica TCS SP2 confocal laser scanning microscope.

To measure the proportion of prespore cells, fully migrating slugs were dissociated into single cells by repeated aspiration in 1% (w/w) cellulase in 2 mM EDTA, pH 6.5. Cells were then fixed in methanol and incubated for 16 hours at 4°C with 1:50 diluted spore-antiserum (Takeuchi, 1963) and for 1 hour with 1:200 diluted GARFITC. The samples were counterstained with 1 μg/ml of 4,6-diaminidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Cells were photographed using a Leica DM LB2 fluorescence microscope and total cells (DAPI-stained) and prespore cells (cells with. 3 FITC-stained vesicles) were counted.

RNA detection by in situ hybridization and RT-PCR

In situ hybridization

Cells were incubated at 106 cells/cm2 on dialysis membrane, supported by PB agar, until the desired developmental stages had been reached. In situ hybridization with 200 ng/ml of digoxigenin (DIG) labelled AcrA RNA was carried out as previously described (Escalante and Loomis, 1995). An antisense AcrA probe was used as a control. To prepare the probes, a 520 bp AcrA fragment was amplified from genomic DNA using primers AcrAcat5′ and AcrAcat3′ (table 1) and cloned into EcoRI/BamHI digested pBluescript KS+. The AcrA fragment was subsequently amplified by PCR using the universal M13-20 and “Reverse” primers. The purified PCR product served as template for synthesis of sense and antisense DIG-labeled AcrA RNA probes using the SP6 and T7 RNA polymerases and reagents from a DIG RNA labelling kit (Roche, UK).

RT-PCR

For semi-quantitative detection of ACG mRNA during development, RNA was extracted using an RNAeasy minikit (Qiagen, Crawley, UK) at 2 hours intervals from cells developing on PB agar. RT-PCR reactions were performed on 400 ng total RNA using primers ACGRT5′ and ACGRT3′ (table 1) and a One-step RT-PCR kit (Qiagen, Crawley, UK).

RESULTS

ACG transcription during Dictyostelium development

Low levels of ACG mRNA were previously only detected in spores (Pitt et al., 1992). This does not preclude expression at an earlier stage, because 2-3 fold lower levels would go undetected in Northern blots. To obtain more information on the spatio-temporal pattern of ACG transcription, we fused 2.8 kb of 5′ flanking sequence of the ACG gene to the β-galactosidase (gal) reporter gene. The parent strain AX3 was transformed with the ACG::gal construct and developing structures were stained with X-gal for β-galactosidase activity. Surprisingly, β-galactosidase activity was already present in aggregating cells and newly formed slugs, although activity was most pronounced in the spore head of fruiting bodies (Figure 1A-C). Because the β-galactosidase protein is stable, it will progressively accumulate in cells, even if gene transcription is low. To investigate whether this caused the discrepancy between the ACG::gal and earlier mRNA data, we made a second gene fusion of the ACG promoter with ile-gal that encodes a labile β-galactosidase protein (Detterbeck et al., 1994). In cells transformed with this construct, β-galactosidase activity was barely detectable in slugs (Fig. 1D), but did become visible in the prespore region of mid-culminants (Fig. 1E). This indicates that ACG promoter activity must be low during early development and only increases significantly at the onset of fruiting body formation.

Figure 1
ACG promoter activity in developing structures

ACG protein levels during development

We next measured the developmental regulation of ACG protein expression by immuno-blotting using an ACG peptide antibody that was raised and tested for specificity previously (Saran and Schaap, 2004). Figure 2A shows that in wild-type cells, ACG protein levels rapidly increased during tip formation to reach a plateau in migrating slugs. Fruiting body formation was accompanied by a further modest increase in ACG protein levels. This expression pattern is more consistent with the expression of prespore genes than that of spore genes. To test this further we measured ACG expression in an ACB/acrA null mutant (Kim et al., 1998; Soderbom et al., 1999). ACB is essential for the expression spore genes, but not for the differentiation of prespore cells. However, also in the acrA- mutant, ACG protein accumulated rapidly during tip formation, with only a minor increase in mature fruiting bodies (Fig. 2B).

Figure 2
Developmental regulation of ACG transcription and ACG protein accumulation

The profiles of ACG protein accumulation measured here, and ACG mRNA measured earlier (Pitt et al., 1992) are quite different, with mRNA only being detected in the spore stage. We used the more sensitive reporter gene assay to determine the developmental profile of ACG promoter activity in wild-type and acrA- cells, both transformed with the ACG::ile-gal constructs. Figure 2C shows that consistent with the earlier data, ACG promoter activity, shows a dramatic increase during fruiting body formation. However, there is low but detectable activity during the entire course of development. This explains why stable β-galactosidase protein could accumulate in early development (Figure 1A,B). Both ACG promoter activity and ACG protein synthesis were normal in acrA- cells. This indicates that unlike other spore genes (Soderbom et al., 1999), the expression of ACG is not dependent on ACB activity.

To assess whether ACG mRNA is synthesized throughout development, we used RT-PCR to amplify an ACG cDNA fragment that spans the two (spliced out) introns of ACG from RNA isolated during development. Figure 2D shows that the RNA derived product with a predicted size of 333 bp was amplified from all developmental stages, but most strongly from fruiting bodies. A 532 bp band that is expected for a genomic DNA derived product was also amplified. These data confirm that ACG is transcribed throughout development.

Localization of ACG in cells and tissues

To gain insight in the role of ACG in slugs, we first visualized the pattern of ACG protein expression. Figure 3A shows that in newly formed slugs ACG protein was exclusively localized at the posterior prespore region. In mid-culminants, ACG protein was highly expressed throughout the prespore region, while being absent from the stalk, prestalk and lower cup regions (Fig. 3B). In spores, ACG was localized at the cell periphery as would be expected for a transmembrane osmosensor (Fig. 3C). However, in slugs αACG staining was distributed in a punctuated fashion over the cells, reminiscent of the distribution of prespore vesicles. To test this we double stained slug cells with αACG antibody (Fig. 3D) and with an αSP85 antibody (Zhang et al., 1999) (Fig. 3E). SP85 is a spore coat protein that is associated with prespore vesicles (Zhang et al., 1998). The superimposed image (Fig. 3F) shows that ACG and SP85 are colocalized in the same cellular compartments, which are most likely the prespore vesicles.

Figure 3
ACG protein in intact structures and cells

The role of ACG in Dictyostelium slugs

The localization of ACG in the posterior prespore region of the slug suggests that ACG could be required to produce extracellular cAMP that is essential for induction of prespore differentiation (Schaap and Van Driel, 1985; Wang et al., 1988) and/or intracellular cAMP for PKA activation, that is required for expression of a subset of prespore genes (Hopper et al., 1993). Null mutants in ACG were originally described to form fruiting bodies normally, but structures were not studied in great detail (Pitt et al., 1992). We compared prespore and spore differentiation in null mutants for ACG, ACB/AcrA and in a mutant that has neither activity. This mutant was made by expressing ACGΔcat, a dominant negative inhibitor of ACG (Saran and Schaap, 2004) in acrA- cells under the constitutive actin15 promoter. A new acg- mutant was created because fruiting body formation in the original mutant has deteriorated over time.

To estimate effects of the mutations on prespore differentiation, we measured both the proportion of prespore cells in dissociated slugs and the expression of the prespore gene CotB (Fosnaugh and Loomis, 1993; Gomer et al., 1986) during normal development to fruiting bodies. Figure 4A shows that the percentage of prespore to total cells was reduced from 64% to 50% in acrA- cells and to 40% in acg- cells. The most severe reduction to about 1/4rd of wild-type prespore proportions is observed in the acrA-/ACGΔcat cells. The developmental expression of the prespore gene CotB showed a similar pattern (Figure 4B). In acrA- cells, cotB expression was slightly reduced, in acg- cells reduction was more severe and in acrA-/ACGΔcat cells CotB mRNA was almost gone.

Figure 4
Prespore and spore differentiation in adenylyl cyclase mutants

All three mutant cell lines still formed fruiting bodies. As previously reported (Soderbom et al., 1999), the spore heads of mature acrA- fruiting bodies contained large numbers of amoeboid cells and only few spores (Figure 4C). In contrast, most cells in the acg- spore heads had matured into spore cells. However, in the acrA-/ACGΔcat spore heads only a few spores and several empty spore cases were visible. The remaining spores were extremely fragile and often ruptured while being carried over on a slide glass for observation.

These combined data show that loss of ACG is most deleterious for prespore differentiation, while loss of ACB has the strongest effect on spore maturation. However, the two enzymes show considerable functional redundancy and the most severe phenotypes on both prespore and spore differentiation are evident when they are both lost.

cAMP induction of prespore gene expression in adenylyl cyclase mutants

The induction of most prespore genes, such as CotB, requires both extracellular cAMP acting on cARs and intracellular cAMP acting on PKA (Hopper et al., 1995; Schaap and Van Driel, 1985). However, the prespore gene PsA is less sensitive to ablation of PKA function (Hopper et al., 1993). To examine whether ACG and/or ACB mediate both the intracellular and extracellular functions of cAMP, we measured to what extent CotB and PsA gene expression were restored by extracellular cAMP in the adenylyl cyclase null mutants. Figure 5 shows that PsA gene expression is almost fully restored by extracellular cAMP in both the acrA-, acg- and acrA-/ACGΔcat mutants. However, CotB induction was reduced in the acrA- and acg- mutant and almost absent in the acrA-/ACGΔcat mutant. These results indicate that ACG and ACB have overlapping roles in both cAR and PKA activation.

Figure 5
Induction of prespore gene expression in adenylyl cyclase mutants

The effect of ACG on the expression of AcrA

ACB does not affect the expression of ACG mRNA or protein (Figs. 2B,C), but it is not clear whether ACG affects the expression of ACB/AcrA. We first examined the spatial expression pattern of AcrA by in situ hybridization (Figure 6A,B). Surprisingly, AcrA is specifically expressed in the prestalk region of slugs and fruiting bodies. To confirm this result and to investigate whether ACG affects the expression pattern of ACB, we prepared a fusion construct of the AcrA promoter with the LacZ reporter and expressed the construct in wild-type and acg- cells. Figure 6C shows that in wild-type cells the AcrA promoter is almost exclusively active in the prestalk cells. However, in the acg- null mutant, AcrA promoter activity extends into the entire prespore region (Fig. 6D). This indicates that ACG normally acts to repress AcrA promoter activity in prespore cells.

Figure 6
AcrA expression in wild-type and acg- cells

DISCUSSION

A low level of ACG mRNA was previously only found in spores, and studies of ACG function have up to now concentrated on the spore stage (Pitt et al., 1992; Saran and Schaap, 2004; Van Es et al., 1996). Our present data confirm that ACG gene expression is strongly up-regulated in maturing fruiting bodies, however there is also significant transcription throughout development. Remarkably, ACG protein is upregulated 12 hours before fruiting bodies are formed in the absence of a corresponding increase in transcription. ACG protein first appears in tipped mounds, to accumulate later in the prespore region of slugs, where it co-localizes with the prespore vesicles. At this location the ACG sensor domain would face the lumen of the vesicle and its catalytic domain would face the cytosol. When prespore vesicles fuse with the plasma membrane in the course of spore maturation, the ACG sensor domain becomes exposed to the cell’s exterior.

Significant ACG-like activity (1.7 pmol cAMP/min.107cells) could previously be detected in slug lysates (Meima and Schaap, 1999; and Meima, M. unpublished data), but no osmostimulation of ACG was detectable in intact slug cells. This indicates that the vesicular localization of ACG does not interfere with its enzyme activity, because the catalytic domain would still be exposed to the substrate Mg2+-ATP in the cytosol. However, osmostimulation may either not be possible, or, dependent on the ambient osmolality in the prespore vesicles, the enzyme may always be in the stimulated state. Most of the cAMP that is produced by any of the three Dictyostelium adenylyl cyclases is rapidly secreted, suggesting a general non-adenylyl cyclase dependent mechanism for cAMP secretion (Meima and Schaap, 1999; Pitt et al., 1992). This implies that as long as cAMP is produced in the cytosol, it can both act as an intracellular and extracellular signal by virtue of its constitutive secretion.

Early work showed that extracellular cAMP is both necessary and sufficient for prespore gene induction: micromolar cAMP acting on surface cAMP receptors triggers prespore differentiation (Schaap and Van Driel, 1985), while depletion of extracellular cAMP in slugs causes dedifferentiation of prespore cells (Wang et al., 1988). However, it was less clear how micromolar cAMP concentrations are being produced in slug posteriors. The aggregation-specific adenylyl cyclase ACA is down-regulated in slugs and remains only expressed in the tip (Verkerke-van Wijk et al., 2001). AcrA null mutants are defective in spore maturation, but not in prespore differentiation (Soderbom et al., 1999). We show here that prespore differentiation is significantly reduced in acg- cells and has almost disappeared from mutants where both ACG and ACB function is abrogated. Such mutants also do not from any mature spores. These data indicate that ACG and ACB play combinatorial roles in prespore and spore differentiation with ACG predominantly responsible for the former and ACB for the latter response.

Surprisingly AcrA/ACB is specifically expressed in prestalk cells, which suggests that its effects on spore maturation may be indirect. In the absence of ACG, AcrA/ACB becomes expressed throughout the prespore region, which adequately explains why prespore differentiation is only partially lost in acg- cells. The low residual level of prespore gene expression that is still present in slugs where both ACG and ACB function are abrogated, could be due to the remaining enzyme ACA.

Expression of the majority of prespore genes not only requires extracellular cAMP acting on cAMP receptors, but also intracellular cAMP acting on PKA (Hopper et al., 1993). We show that ACG produces cAMP for both functions (figure 5), and it was previously shown to produce cAMP for PKA activation in the spore stage. Here ACG acts as a sensor for the high level of osmolytes in the spore head, which serves to keep the spores dormant (Saran and Schaap, 2004; Van Es et al., 1996; Virdy et al., 1999). Recent work in our laboratory indicates that the ACG gene has been conserved throughout the Dictyostelid phylogeny (Ritchie, A.V. and Schaap, P., in preparation). In addition to spore formation in fruiting bodies, many Dictyostelid species can encyst as single cells, which represents the survival strategy of their ancestors, the solitary amoebas (Raper, 1984). The encystation process is triggered by high osmolality and requires activation of PKA (Ritchie, A.V. and Schaap, P., in preparation. It therefore appears that the role of ACG in prespore differentiation and spore dormancy is derived from a deeply conserved role in encystation.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Chris West (University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City) for the 83.5 monoclonal antibody, Peter Devreotes (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore) for aca- cells and the pGACG vector, and Bill Loomis (UCSD, La Jolla) for acrA- cells. This research was supported by BBSRC grants COD16760, Dutch Science Foundation (NWO) grant 805.17.047, and Wellcome Trust grants 057137 and 076618.

REFERENCES

  • Anjard C, Loomis WF. Peptide signaling during terminal differentiation of Dictyostelium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:7607–7611. [PubMed]
  • Detterbeck S, Morandini P, Wetterauer B, Bachmair A, Fischer K, MacWilliams HK. The ‘prespore-like cells’ of Dictyostelium have ceased to express a prespore gene: Analysis using short-lived beta-galactosidases as reporters. Development. 1994;120:2847–2855. [PubMed]
  • Dingermann T, Reindl N, Werner H, Hildebrandt M, Nellen W, Harwood A, Williams J, Nerke K. Optimization and in situ detection of Escherichia coli beta-galactosidase gene expression in Dictyostelium discoideum. Gene. 1989;85:353–362. [PubMed]
  • Escalante R, Loomis WF. Whole-mount in situ hybridization of cell-type-specific mRNAs in Dictyostelium. Dev. Biol. 1995;171:262–266. [PubMed]
  • Fosnaugh KL, Loomis WF. Enhancer regions responsible for temperal and cell-type-specific expression of a spore coat gene in Dictyostelium. Dev. Biol. 1993;157:38–48. [PubMed]
  • Fukui Y, Yumura S, Yumura TK, Mori H. Agar overlay method: highresolution immunofluorescence for the study of the contractile apparatus. Methods Enzymol. 1986;134:573–580. [PubMed]
  • Gomer RH, Datta S, Firtel RA. Cellular and subcellular distribution of a cAMP-regulated prestalk protein and prespore protein in Dictyostelium discoideum: A study on the ontogeny of prestalk and prespore cells. J. Cell Biol. 1986;103:1999–2015. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Harwood AJ, Drury L. New vectors for expression of the E.coli lacZ gene in Dictyostelium. Nucl. Acids Res. 1990;18:4292. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hopper NA, Harwood AJ, Bouzid S, Véron M, Williams JG. Activation of the prespore and spore cell pathway of Dictyostelium differentiation by cAMP-dependent protein kinase and evidence for its upstream regulation by ammonia. EMBO J. 1993;12:2459–2466. [PubMed]
  • Hopper NA, Sanders GM, Fosnaugh KL, Williams JG, Loomis WF. Protein kinase a is a positive regulator of spore coat gene transcription in Dictyostelium. Differentiation. 1995;58:183–188. [PubMed]
  • Kim HJ, Chang WT, Meima M, Gross JD, Schaap P. A novel adenylyl cyclase detected in rapidly developing mutants of Dictyostelium. J. Biol. Chem. 1998;273:30859–30862. [PubMed]
  • Lloyd D, Turner NA, Khunkitti W, Hann AC, Furr JR, Russell AD. Encystation in Acanthamoeba castellanii: development of biocide resistance. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 2001;48:11–16. [PubMed]
  • Mann SKO, Richardson DL, Lee S, Kimmel AR, Firtel RA. Expression of cAMP-dependent protein kinase in prespore cells is sufficient to induce spore cell differentiation in Dictyostelium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1994;91:10561–10565. [PubMed]
  • Marciano-Cabral F, Cabral G. Acanthamoeba spp. as agents of disease in humans. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2003;16:273–307. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • McClellan K, Howard K, Mayhew E, Niederkorn J, Alizadeh H. Adaptive immune responses to Acanthamoeba cysts. Exp. Eye Res. 2002;75:285–293. [PubMed]
  • Meima ME, Schaap P. Fingerprinting of adenylyl cyclase activities during Dictyostelium development indicates a dominant role for adenylyl cyclase B in terminal differentiation. Dev. Biol. 1999;212:182–190. [PubMed]
  • Nellen W, Datta S, Reymond C, Sivertsen A, Mann S, Crowley T, Firtel RA. Molecular Biology in Dictyostelium: Tools and applications. In: Spudich JA, editor. Methods in Cell Biology. Orlando, FL: Academic Press; 1987. pp. 67–100. [PubMed]
  • Pitt GS, Milona N, Borleis J, Lin KC, Reed RR, Devreotes PN. Structurally distinct and stage-specific adenylyl cyclase genes play different roles in Dictyostelium development. Cell. 1992;69:305–315. [PubMed]
  • Raper KB. The Dictyostelids. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press; 1984.
  • Saran S, Schaap P. Adenylyl cyclase G is activated by an intramolecular osmosensor. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2004;15:1479–1486. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Schaap P, Van Driel R. Induction of post-aggregative differentiation in Dictyostelium discoideum by cAMP. Evidence of involvement of the cell surface cAMP receptor. Exp. Cell Res. 1985;159:388–398. [PubMed]
  • Schaap P, Van Ments-Cohen M, Soede RDM, Brandt R, Firtel RA, Dostmann W, Genieser H-G, Jastorff B, Van Haastert PJM. Cell-permeable non-hydrolyzable cAMP derivatives as tools for analysis of signaling pathways controlling gene regulation in Dictyostelium. J. Biol. Chem. 1993;268:6323–6331. [PubMed]
  • Shaulsky G, Escalante R, Loomis WF. Developmental signal transduction pathways uncovered by genetic suppressors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1996;93:15260–15265. [PubMed]
  • Shaulsky G, Fuller D, Loomis WF. A cAMP-phosphodiesterase controls PKA-dependent differentiation. Development. 1998;125:691–699. [PubMed]
  • Soderbom F, Anjard C, Iranfar N, Fuller D, Loomis WF. An adenylyl cyclase that functions during late development of Dictyostelium. Development. 1999;126:5463–5471. [PubMed]
  • Stanley J, Samuel L. Amoebiasis. The Lancet. 2003;361:1025–1034. [PubMed]
  • Sutoh K. A transformation vector for Dictyostelium discoideum with a new selectable marker bsr. Plasmid. 1993;30:150–154. [PubMed]
  • Sutoh K. A transformation vector for Dictyostelium discoideum with a new selectable marker bsr. Plasmid. 1993;30:150–154. [PubMed]
  • Takeuchi I. Immunochemical and immunohistochemical studies on the development of the cellular slime mold Dictyostelium mucoroides. Dev. Biol. 1963;8:1–26. [PubMed]
  • Thomason PA, Traynor D, Cavet G, Chang W-T, Harwood AJ, Kay RR. An intersection of the cAMP/PKA and two-component signal transduction systems in Dictyostelium. EMBO J. 1998;17:2838–2845. [PubMed]
  • Thomason PA, Traynor D, Stock JB, Kay RR. The RdeA-RegA system, a eukaryotic phospho-relay controlling cAMP breakdown. J. Biol. Chem. 1999;274:27379–27384. [PubMed]
  • Van Es S, Virdy KJ, Pitt GS, Meima M, Sands TW, Devreotes PN, Cotter DA, Schaap P. Adenylyl cyclase G, an osmosensor controlling germination of Dictyostelium spores. J. Biol. Chem. 1996;271:23623–23625. [PubMed]
  • Verkerke-van Wijk I, Fukuzawa M, Devreotes PN, Schaap P. Adenylyl cyclase A expression is tip-specific in Dictyostelium slugs and directs StatA nuclear translocation and CudA gene expression. Dev. Biol. 2001;234:151–160. [PubMed]
  • Virdy KJ, Sands TW, Kopko SH, van Es S, Meima M, Schaap P, Cotter DA. High cAMP in spores of Dictyostelium discoideum: association with spore dormancy and inhibition of germination. Microbiology. 1999;145:1883–1890. [PubMed]
  • Wang M, Van Driel R, Schaap P. Cyclic AMP-phosphodiesterase induces dedifferentiation of prespore cells in Dictyostelium discoideum slugs: evidence that cyclic AMP is the morphogenetic signal for prespore differentiation. Development. 1988;103:611–618.
  • Wang N, Soderbom F, Anjard C, Shaulsky G, Loomis WF. SDF-2 induction of terminal differentiation in Dictyostelium discoideum is mediated by the membrane-spanning sensor kinase DhkA. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1999;19:4750–4756. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • West CM, Erdos GW. Formation of the Dictyostelium spore coat. Dev. Gen. 1990;11:492–506. [PubMed]
  • Williams JG, Ceccarelli A, McRobbie S, Mahbubani H, Kay RR, Early A, Berks M, Jermyn KA. Direct induction of Dictyostelium prestalk gene expression by DIF provides evidence that DIF is a morphogen. Cell. 1987;49:185–192. [PubMed]
  • Zhang Y, Zhang P, West CM. A linking function for the cellulose-binding protein SP85 in the spore coat of Dictyostelium discoideum. J. Cell Sci. 1999;112:4367–4377. [PubMed]
  • Zhang YY, Brown RD, West CM. Two proteins of the Dictyostelium spore coat bind to cellulose in vitro. Biochemistry. 1998;37:10766–10779. [PubMed]