Gab1 is a specific intracellular substrate of the receptor tyrosine kinase c-Met and involved in c-Met–specific signaling pathways induced by HGF/SF. In this work, we analyzed the interaction of Gab1 with the c-Met receptor and examined its association with downstream targets induced by Gab1 phosphorylation. Interaction with c-Met is mediated via a unique phosphotyrosyl interaction site, the 13–amino acid c-Met–binding site MBS. Upon stimulation with HGF/SF, Gab1 is phosphorylated by c-Met and associates with the signaling molecules PI(3)K, Shp2, PLC-γ, Shc (Hοlgado-Madruga et al., 1996;
Ingham et al. 1998;
Takahashi-Tezuka et al. 1998;
Maroun et al. 1999), and the newly identified interaction partner, CRKL. By using a trk-met-Gab1 hybrid, we found that association of Gab1 with Shp2, but not PI(3)K or CRKL is essential for c-Met-Gab1–induced branching morphogenesis activity. This is direct evidence that Gab1 is sufficient to mediate c-Met specific signals in cultured cells. A fundamental role of Gab1 for c-Met–specific signaling is supported by recent gene ablation experiments in the mouse: Gab1
−/− embryos display reduced liver size, placental defects and are characterized by strongly reduced and delayed migration of myogenic precursor cells into the limbs (Sachs, M., H. Brohmann, D. Zechner, T. Müller, J. Hülsken, U. Schaeper, C. Birchmeier, and W. Birchmeier, manuscript submitted for publication), a phenotype reminiscent of HGF/SF
−/−and c-Met
−/− mutant embryos (
Bladt et al. 1995).
The c-Met–binding site of Gab1 was identified genetically by reverse yeast two-hybrid technology (
Vidal et al. 1996a): by using a double selection protocol to screen Gab1 mutants against c-Met association, but for Grb2 binding, we enriched for mutations that interfered with c-Met association, but not with other protein functions. The positions of single point mutations that reduce c-Met association define the MBS, residues 487–499 of Gab1. Most likely, the MBS is the site of direct contact with c-Met, since insertion of the MBS confers c-Met–binding activity to p97/Gab2. Additional residues within the MBD or the homologous region of p97/Gab2 are also required to form a functional c-Met–binding site, since the minimal domain sufficient for c-Met interaction is larger, 450–532 of Gab1, and peptides corresponding to MBS sequence did not block c-Met association (
Weidner et al. 1996, and data not shown).
By a similar screening protocol, we were able to locate a Grb2-binding site in the Gab1 sequence PPVDRNLKP, residue 518–526, which does not conform to the common proline-rich consensus binding motif for SH3 domains, PXXP (
Feng et al. 1994). It is also distinct from the recently discovered SH3-binding motif, PXXDY, found in Eps8 interacting peptides (
Mongiovi et al. 1999). Similar sequences are present in the Grb2-binding docking proteins p97/Gab2, SLP-76, and BLNK and in
Drosophila DOS (
Gu et al. 1998;
Jackman et al. 1995;
Motto et al. 1996;
Fu et al. 1998;
Raabe et al. 1996), but until now, they have not been recognized as putative Grb2 consensus binding sites.
While the MBS of Gab1 mediates the direct contact with c-Met, Grb2 has also been implicated in mediating indirectly the association of Gab1 with c-Met. Mutation of the Grb2 consensus binding site of c-Met, Y1356VNV to Y1356VHV, reduced interaction with Gab1 in cells (
Bardelli et al. 1997;
Nguyen et al. 1997). But since this mutation is in the multiple docking site of c-Met, it was not clear if interactions with other as yet unidentified adaptor proteins or the direct interaction with Gab1 itself were disturbed. We could now address this question by expressing Gab1 mutants deficient for direct association with c-Met or Grb2. We showed that Gab1 mutants deficient in Grb2 binding associate with c-Met, even though with reduced strength compared with wild-type Gab1. This demonstrates that in cells, association with c-Met is direct and requires the MBS. This is consistent with our finding that p97/Gab2, which binds Grb2 but not c-Met, associates with c-Met when the c-Met–binding site of Gab1 is inserted. Gab1 was originally cloned as a Grb2 interacting protein and interacts strongly with Grb2 (
Holgado-Madruga et al. 1996, and this paper). We identified two Grb2-binding sites present in the Gab1 sequence. The first site is located at residues 341–348 and conforms to the classical proline-rich consensus binding motif PXXP for SH3 domains (
Feng et al. 1994). The second binding site is located in close proximity to the MBS and constitutes a novel Grb2-binding motif PX(V/I)(D/N)RXXKP. Both sites can mediate Grb2 association and are conserved in the Gab1-related protein p97/Gab2. Since Gab1 binds the SH3 domains of Grb2, the SH2 domain of Grb2 can contribute to the cellular association of Gab1 with c-Met (), but could also couple Gab1 to other signaling pathways. For instance, Gab1 is also a substrate of the EGF receptor, the insulin receptor, and the NGF receptor trk (
Holgado-Madruga et al. 1996,
Holgado-Madruga et al. 1997). The EGF receptor binds Grb2 directly, and its Grb2-binding sites are also required for recruitment of Gab1 (
Okutani et al. 1994;
Rodrigues et al. 2000); thus, the EGF receptor may recruit Gab1 via Grb2-Gab1 complexes. Trk and insulin receptors could couple to Gab1 by association with the Shc adaptor, which upon phosphorylation binds Grb2 complexes (
Skolnik et al. 1993;
Dikic et al. 1995). Similarly, Gab1 is phosphorylated in response to cytokines and involved in activation of the MAPK pathway (
Takahashi-Tezuka et al. 1998). This activation requires the Shp2-binding site of the cytokine receptor gp130 and correlates with association of Gab1 with Shp2 and PI(3)K. While Gab1 does not interact directly with gp130 (
Takahashi-Tezuka et al. 1998), it could be recruited indirectly via association with Grb2 and phosphorylated Shp2.
To characterize the interaction of Gab1 with downstream substrates, we have modified the classical yeast two-hybrid assay (
Chien et al. 1991). Fusion of Gab1 with the constitutively active kinase, tpr-met oncogene, induces tyrosine phosphorylation and interaction with signaling molecules like PI(3)K, PLC-γ, and Shp2. The advantage of this system over the tribrid approach (
Licitra and Liu 1996;
Rocchi et al. 1998) is that it can be easily adapted to the two-hybrid system available and does not require a third genetic marker for expression of tpr-met kinase. In addition, we observed that the kinase tpr-met is less toxic in yeast when expressed as a bait with the LexA DNA-binding domain than in its cytoplasmic form. By yeast two-hybrid screening, we identified CRKL as a new interaction partner for Gab1. CRKL is a Crk-related adaptor protein that consists of one SH2 and two SH3 domains (
ten Hoeve et al. 1993). The interaction of CRKL with Gab1 is mediated via its SH2 domain, and the CRKL-binding site of Gab1 maps to amino acids 242–410. Interestingly, this region contains a cluster of 6 Crk/CRKL consensus binding sites (YXXP;
Songyang et al. 1993). Multiple Crk/CRKL-binding sites are also clustered in the substrate binding regions of the Crk/CRKL interacting docking protein p130Cas and the Cas-like docking proteins CasL/HEF1 and Efs/Sinthe (
Sakai et al. 1994;
Ishino et al. 1995;
Astier et al. 1997), suggesting a common theme in which multiple CRKL complexes could be recruited simultaneously. Via its SH3 domains, CRKL can associate with multiple effector proteins, like C3G (a GDP GTP exchange factor for Rap1), the tyrosine kinase c-Abl, HPK (human progenitor kinase), and p85 PI(3)K subunit (reviewed by
Feller et al. 1998). Crk and CRKL have been implicated in the activation of JNK and Rap1 kinase pathways (
Gotoh et al. 1995;
Tanaka and Hanafusa 1998). Recently, it was shown that HGF/SF stimulates Rap1 activation that is dependent on C3G and Gab1-CRKL association (
Sakkab et al. 2000). Since c-Met does not bind CRKL directly, recruitment of CRKL-C3G complexes by Gab1 is the likely mechanism that leads to Rap1 activation. The interaction of CRKL with p85 PI(3)K could explain the significant association of p85 with Gab1 mutants where all three PI(3)K consensus binding sites are mutated. Future experiments will determine which CRKL-dependent pathways are important for Gab1 function in cells.
The activity of Gab1 mutants was examined in c-Met–dependent branching morphogenesis assays. Trk-met hybrid receptors have been useful for the analysis of mutant receptor function, since they can be activated in the absence of endogenous wild-type receptor stimulation (
Weidner et al. 1993;
Sachs et al. 1996). We carried this analysis further and tested the activity of the kinase substrate Gab1 by fusing it to the COOH terminus of trk-met. This hybrid receptor approach allowed us to control the activity of exogenous Gab1 by stimulation with NGF, this is in contrast to the overexpression of Gab1, which may result in constitutive activation (
Weidner et al. 1996). A trk-met-Gab1 hybrid receptor expressing just the COOH terminus of Gab1, residues 450–695, was sufficient to induce branching morphogenesis activity in response to NGF activation. Importantly, we found that association of Gab1 with Shp2 is essential for Gab1-induced branching morphogenesis, since a mutation in the Shp2-binding site abrogated this activity ( B). Shp2 has previously been shown to be involved in many morphological processes: for instance FGF- or activin-dependent mesoderm induction, cell spreading, and migration (
Tang et al. 1995;
Yu et al. 1998;
Saxton and Pawson 1999). As a consequence, Shp2
−/− mice display severe defects in mesodermal patterning and gastrulation (
Saxton et al. 1997). Genetic evidence has linked Corkscrew, the
Drosophila homologue of SHP2, to DOS, a Gab1-like docking protein, and to activation of the MAPK pathway (
Herbst et al. 1996;
Raabe et al. 1996). We could show that association of Gab1 with Shp2 is also required for HGF/SF-dependent Erk2 phosphorylation and Elk1 activation, a substrate of MAPKs. The mechanism by which Shp2 transduces c-Met/Gab1–specific signals is not known. Shp2 is a tyrosine phosphatase, and via its catalytic activity could modulate the activity of other enzymes regulating the MAPK cascade. Its phosphatase activity has been shown to be essential for mesoderm induction and for activation of the MAPK pathway by a number of growth factors, like EGF, FGF and IL3 (
Bennett et al. 1996;
O'Reilly and Neel 1998;
Gu et al. 1998). In addition, Shp2 could function as an adaptor: upon phosphorylation it can bind the SH2 domain of Grb2 and by targeting Grb2/Sos complexes to the membrane, could directly activate the Ras pathway (
Li et al. 1994;
Bennett et al. 1994). We observed that catalytic inactive Shp2 mutants block HGF/SF-dependent Elk activation, suggesting that the phosphatase activity of Shp2 is critical for Gab1/Shp2 signaling. A 90-kD protein that can serve as a substrate of Shp2 has recently been identified in a complex with Gab1 and thus could play a role in this pathway (
Shi et al. 2000).
Surprisingly, direct association with PI(3)K does not appear not to be essential for branching morphogenesis activity induced by the trk-met-Gab1 hybrid, even though it was shown by the use of chemical inhibitors LY294002 and PD98059 that PI(3)K as well as MAPK activity are required for this process (
Khwaja et al. 1998). This could be due to high basal PI(3)K activity observed in unstimulated MDCK cells (
Maroun et al. 1999) or residual PI(3)K activation by the Gab1ΔPI(3)K mutant. It was also shown that overexpression of Gab1 mutants lacking PI(3)K-binding sites could partially rescue branching morphogenesis defects of c-Met receptor mutants with reduced affinity for Gab1 (
Maroun et al. 1999), indicating that further activation of PI(3)K by Gab1 is not required for branching morphogenesis. Using the same assay, it was shown that the PH domain of Gab1 is required for branching morphogenesis and membrane targeting (
Maroun et al. 1999). However, the PH domain is not essential for branching morphogenesis activity induced by the trk-Met-Gab1 fusion protein, suggesting that its primary function is to target Gab1 to the cell membrane, an activity redundant for the transmembrane fusion protein trk-met-Gab1.
A growing number of docking proteins has been identified that is involved in the activation of specific signaling pathways of tyrosine kinases. They differ by their ability to couple to respective tyrosine kinase receptors, by expression pattern, but also by association with different sets of effector molecules. For instance, IRS-1 interacts with PI(3)K, Grb2, Shc, Shp2, Csr, Nck, and Fyn (reviewed by
Ogawa et al. 1998). Studies using biochemical inhibitors for PI(3)K activity have shown that the PI(3)K pathway plays a fundamental role for metabolic changes induced by insulin. The PI(3)K pathway is also critical for insulin receptor/insulin-like growth factor receptor signaling in
Drosophila and
C.
elegans, since many genes that affect the pathways encode proteins that are involved in the PI(3)K cascade, like p110 PI(3)K itself, p110 substrates Akt1, Akt2 and Daf-16, a potential substrate of Akt kinase pathways and PTEN (
Morris et al. 1996;
Kimura et al. 1997;
Ogg and Ruvkun 1998;
Paradis and Ruvkun 1998;
Staveley et al. 1998). In contrast, p62dok family members have been shown to associate with p120RasGAP, Nck and Crk family members (
Carpino et al. 1997;
Yamanashi and Baltimore 1997;
Bhat et al. 1998;
Di Cristofano et al. 1998;
Jones and Dumont 1998;
Nelms et al. 1998). A p62dok mutant impaired for binding to Nck and p120RasGAP is unable to promote insulin-stimulated cell migration, implicating Nck and/or p120RasGAP as important effectors for p62dok signaling (
Noguchi et al. 1999).
The Gab1 family proteins Gab1 and p97/Gab2 associate with PI(3)K, PLC-γ, Shc, and Shp2 (
Holgado-Madruga et al. 1996;
Gu et al. 1998;
Takahashi-Tezuka et al. 1998;
Lecoq-Lafon et al. 1999;
Nishida et al. 1999). In addition, we could demonstrate association of Gab1 with CRKL. The binding sites for PI(3)K, Shp2, and CRKL, as well as SH3-binding sites for Grb2 are conserved in p97/Gab2 and
Drosophila DOS, suggesting that Gab1 family members function by activating a similar set of signal transducers. Shp2 has been linked to DOS as a modulator in Sevenless receptor signaling, and p97/Gab2 requires association with Shp2 for gene regulation (
Herbst et al. 1996;
Raabe et al. 1996;
Gu et al. 1998). In this paper, we could show that Shp2 is an important effector for Gab1 signaling, suggesting that Shp2 is critical for the function of Gab1 family members.