The present work was undertaken as a direct extension of our previous work demonstrating that CD14 on human macrophages plays a key role in the clearance of apoptotic cells in vitro (
Devitt et al., 1998,
2003). Here, we show (a) that CD14 acts as a tethering receptor of apoptotic cells, (b) that, in animals deficient in CD14, apoptotic cells are cleared sub-optimally, resulting in increased frequencies of apoptotic cells and bodies at multiple sites in situ, and (c) that such persistent apoptotic cells are not proinflammatory.
Our conclusion that the observed phenotype of CD14
−/− mice is due to the persistence of apoptotic cells as a result of impaired clearance, rather than to increased apoptosis, is based on several observations. First, our quantitative histological analyses suggested that, in tissues of CD14
−/− animals, fewer apoptotic cells were associated with macrophages as compared with those of wild-type animals. Second, we found that macrophages from CD14
−/− animals were less effective than their normal counterparts in clearing apoptotic cells in standard in vitro assays despite equivalent clearance of antibody-opsonized cells regardless of CD14 expression, indicating that CD14
−/− macrophages are not fundamentally flawed in their capacity to phagocytose. CD14-deficient macrophages are similarly unimpaired in their ability to phagocytose whole bacteria (
Moore et al., 2000). Third, when apoptotic cells were introduced into the peritoneal cavity and permitted to interact with peritoneal macrophages in a well-established short-term in vivo assay (
Taylor et al., 2000), CD14
−/− macrophages were found to be less effective than their CD14
+/+ counterparts in binding and phagocytosing apoptotic cells. Finally, we used dexamethasone to induce massive, synchronous thymocyte apoptosis in situ. Again, we found that the phagocytosis of the apoptotic cells so induced in the CD14
−/− animals was less effective than in CD14
+/+ animals, leading to persistence of greater numbers of free apoptotic cells. Significantly, thymocytes from CD14
−/− and CD14
+/+ animals were similarly sensitive to apoptosis induction by dexamethasone.
As well as playing a role in apoptotic cell clearance, CD14 is functional in innate immune responses against microbial products, particularly LPS (for reviews see
Ulevitch and Tobias, 1995;
Kitchens, 2000). However, subtle infections resulting from the absence of CD14 are unlikely to account for the increased numbers of apoptotic cells observed in the tissues of CD14
−/− mice. Although infectious agents can induce apoptosis in tissues, including the thymus (
Ayala et al., 1996;
Hotchkiss et al., 2001), the animals used for these studies were healthy and fertile and it should be noted that the normal phagocytic capacity of mice is such that increased numbers of free apoptotic cells are observed only when massive levels of synchronous apoptosis are induced causing overload of the clearance mechanisms (for review see
Ogasawara et al., 1993) or when the clearance mechanisms themselves are compromised (
Botto et al., 1998;
Hamon et al., 2000;
Scott et al., 2001;
Li et al., 2003;
Hanayama et al., 2004). Here, we have used a range of in vitro and in vivo assays of apoptotic cell clearance that accord with each other and are consistent with the conclusion that CD14
−/− animals are inefficient in clearing apoptotic cells rather than being more susceptible to the induction of apoptosis.
CD14 is one of several macrophage receptors implicated, mainly through in vitro studies, in the clearance of apoptotic cells. The results presented here indicate that CD14 plays a non-redundant or only partially redundant role in apoptotic cell clearance in normal animals. We observed persistence of apoptotic cells in all tissues studied—thymus, spleen, lung, liver, and gut. This finding contrasts with animals that are functionally deficient in the Mer tyrosine kinase, which also display an apoptotic cell clearance defect in vivo. In unchallenged animals, clearance of apoptotic cells in the thymus, the only tissue thus far reported, was found to be normal in Mer-deficient mice; treatment with dexamethasone was required to reveal the clearance defect in situ (
Scott et al., 2001). SR-A–deficient thymic macrophages, which are defective in their capacity to engulf apoptotic thymocytes in vitro, are uncompromised in SR-A–deficient thymi in situ even when thymocyte apoptosis is accelerated by irradiation (
Platt et al., 2000). Clearly, therefore, the functions of CD14, Mer, and SR-A in enabling or supporting apoptotic cell clearance in vivo are separable. Besides CD14, the only other molecules whose absence has thus far been reported to generate apoptotic cell clearance defects in unchallenged adult tissue in situ are the bridging molecules C1q and MFG-E8 (
Botto et al., 1998;
Hanayama et al., 2004). C1q deficiency leads to the persistence of apoptotic cells specifically in glomeruli of genetically susceptible mice (
Botto et al., 1998). In MFG-E8–deficient mice, apoptotic cell engulfment is impaired in the germinal centers of secondary lymphoid follicles (
Hanayama et al., 2004). Apoptotic cells appear not to persist at other sites in either C1q- or MFG-E8–deficient mice. Significantly, consequences of the absence of CD14 are manifest widely with all adult tissues examined thus far displaying persistence of apoptotic cells in situ. We conclude that CD14 has a broad role, being required for efficient apoptotic cell clearance at multiple tissue sites.
Although the detailed molecular mechanisms underlying CD14's involvement in apoptotic cell clearance have yet to be defined, they differ from those involving C1q, Mer, and MFG-E8. C1q appears to bridge apoptotic cells to CD91/calreticulin on phagocytes (
Ogden et al., 2001), Mer probably associates with apoptotic cell surface phosphatidylserine (PS) via the bridging protein Gas6 (
Ishimoto et al., 2000), and MFG-E8 bridges PS to phagocyte vitronectin receptor integrins (
Hanayama et al., 2002). Notably, tethering of apoptotic cells appears to be normal in both Mer- and MFG-E8–deficient animals (
Scott et al., 2001;
Hanayama et al., 2004). Previous work has suggested that CD14 functions to tether apoptotic cells to the phagocyte surface (
Devitt et al., 1998;
Hoffmann et al., 2001). We now provide strong evidence in support of this notion, demonstrating a role for CD14 in tethering apoptotic cells to macrophages and showing that purified CD14 can bind effectively to apoptotic, but not viable, cells. Therefore, CD14's major, and perhaps sole, function in clearing apoptotic cells may be in the initial recognition and binding phase of the process. In this model, additional receptor–ligand interactions (e.g., PS exposed on apoptotic cells binding via Gas6 to Mer [
Ishimoto et al., 2000] or via MFG-E8 to vitronectin receptors [
Hanayama et al., 2002]) would be required to induce phagocytosis/anti-inflammatory responses in the phagocyte.
In the present scenario, even though CD14 deficiency leads to persistence of apoptotic cells in many locations, such persistence is not accompanied by inflammatory reactions at these sites. This contrasts with the effects of massive apoptosis, which can generate inflammatory effects (
Uchimura et al., 2000;
Lorimore et al., 2001). Evidence has been provided that defective apoptotic cell clearance, given appropriate genetic background (C57BL/6,129 or mixed), is associated with increased productivity of autoantibodies and increased incidence of autoimmune disease (
Botto et al., 1998;
Scott et al., 2001;
Mitchell et al., 2002;
Cohen et al., 2002;
Szondy et al., 2003;
Hanayama et al., 2004). However, a causative link between defective apoptotic cell clearance and autoimmune disease pathogenesis is far from clear because of the strains of mice used (
Bygrave et al., 2004). Significantly, autoantibody production is not enhanced in the CD14
−/− animals investigated here. Balb/c animals, the background strain used here, are not inherently resistant to autoimmune disease (
Horai et al., 2000;
Rudner et al., 2003). Our results are consistent with the idea that CD14 provides a non-redundant tethering mechanism that facilitates the interaction of apoptotic cells with macrophages. Although this mechanism is absent in CD14
−/− mice, the signaling mechanisms that prevent inflammatory and possibly autoimmune responses to persistent apoptotic cells appear to remain intact. Therefore, the tethering activity of CD14 in clearing apoptotic cells can be functionally uncoupled from the mechanisms that prevent such cells generating inflammatory or immunostimulatory responses. This supports the view that different receptor–ligand interactions are required for different phases of the clearance process as we and others have previously proposed. The functional separation of anti-inflammatory and engulfment signaling events has been described recently (
Cvetanovic and Ucker, 2004).
Because apoptotic cell phagocytosis appears to be reduced rather than blocked in CD14−/− mice, it would appear that additional clearance mechanisms are also operable. Such mechanisms may include lower affinity tethering mechanisms and mechanisms that relate specifically to apoptotic cells at later stages than those normally detected by CD14. The relative inefficiency of these mechanisms that causes apoptotic cell persistence is indicative of a non-redundant or only partially redundant role for CD14 in the clearance of apoptotic cells.
The binding of purified CD14, a prototypical PRR, to apoptotic but not viable cells indicates that activation of the apoptosis program leads to the display of cellular CD14-ligands. In line with the conserved microbial PRR ligands (such as LPS) being termed pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), such host PRR ligands have been collectively termed apoptotic cell–associated molecular patterns (ACAMPs;
Franc et al., 1999;
Gregory, 2000). A key difference between ligation of PRRs by PAMPs versus ACAMPs is the response of the host cell, with PAMPs generating proinflammatory and ACAMPs anti-inflammatory responses. Of critical importance to understanding CD14's role in apoptotic cell clearance is defining the mechanistic differences underlying responses to PAMPs versus ACAMPs. We have previously proposed several scenarios including a “minimalist” view of CD14 acting solely as a tethering receptor (
Gregory, 2000;
Gregory and Devitt, 2004). The present results support this view but do not preclude CD14 playing additional roles in the clearance process, for example cooperating with molecular partners to generate or facilitate intracellular signals for engulfment. In this context, cooperation with toll-like receptors, as in the generation of proinflammatory responses to PAMPs, appears unlikely (
Li et al., 2001;
Blander and Medzhitov, 2004;
Cvetanovic and Ucker, 2004;
Shiratsuchi et al., 2004).
The results presented here first demonstrate that absence of the mechanism(s) served by CD14 in the phagocytic clearance of apoptotic cells reveals apoptosis in multiple tissues. The lack of the CD14-dependent mechanism(s) of rapid apoptotic cell disposal appears not to be detrimental to the host. Notably, CD14
−/− animals are healthy, inflammatory lesions associated with persistent apoptotic cells are absent, autoantibody production is similar to that of wild-type animals, and no autoimmune disease is detectable despite detailed histopathological analyses of aged animals. Therefore, the results presented here clearly demonstrate that apoptotic cells can persist without consequent inflammation or autoimmune disease development despite the susceptibility of the Balb/c strain to autoimmune disease (
Horai et al., 2000;
Rudner et al., 2003). Indeed, our findings raise the possibility that persistence under these circumstances may prolong the anti-inflammatory effects of apoptotic cells.