|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Protein tyrosine phosphatase PTP-SL retains mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases in the cytoplasm in an inactive form by association through a kinase interaction motif (KIM) and tyrosine dephosphorylation. The related tyrosine phosphatases PTP-SL and STEP were phosphorylated by the cAMP-dependent protein kinase A (PKA). The PKA phosphorylation site on PTP-SL was identified as the Ser231 residue, located within the KIM. Upon phosphorylation of Ser231, PTP-SL binding and tyrosine dephosphorylation of the MAP kinases extracellular signal–regulated kinase (ERK)1/2 and p38α were impaired. Furthermore, treatment of COS-7 cells with PKA activators, or overexpression of the Cα catalytic subunit of PKA, inhibited the cytoplasmic retention of ERK2 and p38α by wild-type PTP-SL, but not by a PTP-SL S231A mutant. These findings support the existence of a novel mechanism by which PKA may regulate the activation and translocation to the nucleus of MAP kinases.
The mammalian mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathways are signaling cascades differentially activated by growth factors, mitogens, hormones, as well as by stress and inflammation, which contribute to the control of cell growth, differentiation, and survival (Cobb and Goldsmith 1995; Kyriakis and Avruch 1996). Each pathway behaves as a multimolecular complex of receptors and regulatory and adapter proteins, which are functionally assembled around a modular core of three kinases (Whitmarsh and Davis 1998; Schaeffer and Weber 1999). A major mechanism of internal regulation and signal amplification of these cascades is the sequential phosphorylation and activation of the kinases within each three-kinase module, leading to the activation in the cytoplasm of the effector kinases extracellular signal–regulated kinase (ERK)1/2, c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK), or p38, and their translocation to the nucleus, where phosphorylation of transcription factors takes place (Karin 1995; Treisman 1996). In addition, the crosstalk between distinct MAP kinases cascades as well as with protein kinases from other pathways, such as protein kinase A or C (PKA or PKC, respectively), cooperates in the integration of the signals delivered through the MAP kinases (Burgering and Bos 1995; Robinson and Cobb 1997). The participation of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase, PKA, in the differential modulation of MAP kinase pathways has been documented. For instance, in T lymphocytes, PKA mediates the inhibition of the JNK but not of the ERK1/2 pathway (Hsueh and Lai 1995), whereas in Rat1 fibroblasts, adipocytes, and muscle cells, PKA inhibits ERK1/2 by interfering with the activation of Raf-1 by Ras (Cook and McCormick 1993; Graves et al. 1993; Sevetson et al. 1993; Wu et al. 1993). Conversely, PKA cooperates in the sustained activation of ERK1/2 in pheochromocytoma PC12 cells, in a process that involves the activation of the Rap1/B-Raf pathway (Frödin et al. 1994; Vossler et al. 1997).
The protein tyrosine phosphatases PTP-SL, STEP, and HePTP have emerged as major regulators of MAP kinase functions on the basis of their association with ERK1/2 and p38 through a 16–amino acid kinase interaction motif (KIM), located in their cytosolic noncatalytic regions (Pulido et al. 1998; Oh-hora et al. 1999; Saxena et al. 1999a; Zúñiga et al. 1999). PTP-SL is encoded by a single gene, although different transcripts have been described that generate distinct transmembrane and nontransmembrane isoforms, which are excluded from the nucleus and whose expression is developmentally regulated in the brain (Hendriks et al. 1995; Ogata et al. 1995; Sharma and Lombroso 1995; Shiozuka et al. 1995). Binding of ERK1/2 to the KIM of PTP-SL blocks the nuclear translocation of these MAP kinases, and favors their dephosphorylation and inactivation by the phosphatase in the cytoplasm (Zúñiga et al. 1999). Essential residues within the KIM of PTP-SL for the recognition of ERK1/2 include those within a PKA consensus phosphorylation sequence, raising the possibility that PKA could regulate the association of PTP-SL with the MAP kinases by KIM phosphorylation. In this report, we have investigated the involvement of PKA in the regulation of the association of PTP-SL with ERK1/2 and p38α. We have found that phosphorylation of the KIM of PTP-SL by PKA is a major regulatory mechanism of the activities of these MAP kinases and their translocation to the nucleus.
PTP-SL, STEP, and ERK2 cDNA constructs have been previously described (Pulido et al. 1998; Zúñiga et al. 1999). pCαEV (cPKAα, mouse sequence; Uhler and McKnight 1987) was provided by G.S. McKnight (University of Washington, Seattle, WA). pECE-HA-p38MAPK (p38α, mouse sequence; Brunet and Pouysségur 1996) was provided by J. Pouysségur (Centre de Biochimie-CNRS, Nice, France). pRK5-GST-PTP-SL mammalian expression vectors were made by PCR with a primer containing a Kozak sequence followed by a start codon and the S. Japanicum glutathione-S-transferase (GST) sequence. Antibodies and reagents were used as described (Pulido et al. 1998; Zúñiga et al. 1999). Rabbit polyclonal anti-p38α (C-20) was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. Dibutyryl-cAMP and okadaic acid (Boehringer Mannheim) were used at final concentrations of 2 mM and 1 μM, respectively. Forskolin (ICN Pharmaceuticals Inc.) was used at a final concentration of 40 μM, in the continuous presence of 1 mM IBMX (Sigma Chemical Co.). The PKA inhibitor H89 (Biomol) was used at a final concentration of 25 μM. When used, IBMX and H89 were added to the cells 30 min before stimulation. The bovine PKA catalytic subunit (cPKA) was purchased from Promega Corp.
For PKA in vitro kinase assays, GST fusion proteins (1 μg) were incubated at room temperature during 1 h with 0.5 U/μl of cPKA in the presence of 2 μCi of γ-[32P]ATP, 10 μM ATP, and 8 mM MgCl2 (20 μl final volume). The reactions were stopped by adding SDS sample buffer and boiling, followed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. For in vitro association assays (see Fig. 2 A), GST fusion proteins were phosphorylated with cPKA as above, in the presence of 200 μM cold ATP, and then mixed with cell lysates and precipitated with glutathione-Sepharose, followed by immunoblotting. In vitro phosphatase assays were performed in 25 mM Hepes, pH 7.3, 5 mM EDTA, and 10 mM DTT (40 μl final volume), at 37°C, during the indicated times, as described in Zúñiga et al. 1999.
Rat fibroblast Rat-1, human embryonic kidney 293, and Simian COS-7 cell lines, were grown in DME containing high glucose supplemented with 5% (for COS-7 cells) or 10% heat-inactivated FCS. Cells were transfected using the DEAE-dextran method (COS-7 cells) or the calcium phosphate precipitation method (293 cells), and were harvested after 48–72 h of culture. In cells transfected with pCαEV, the expression of cPKAα was induced by incubation during the last 24 h of culture in the presence of 100 μM ZnSO4. For 32P-labeling, transfected COS-7 cells were cultured for 4 h with phosphate-free DME 2% FCS in the presence of [32P]inorganic phosphate (100 μCi/ml), and then cells were treated with dibutyryl-cAMP or forskolin plus IBMX during 1 h, or with okadaic acid during 30 min. HA-ERK2 or HA-p38α from transfected 293 cells were activated by cell treatment with EGF (5 min, 50 ng/ml) or sorbitol (30 min, 0.5 M), respectively. Cell lysis, precipitation with GST-fusion proteins, immunoprecipitation, and immunoblotting were done as described (Pulido et al. 1998).
COS-7 cells were processed for immunofluorescence as described (Zúñiga et al. 1999). In brief, after transfection, cells were rinsed with IPBS buffer (1.5 mM KH2PO4, 4.3 mM Na2HPO4, 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 0.7 mM CaCl2, and 0.5 mM MgCl2, pH 7.4), and then fixed with methanol. Samples were incubated in blocking solution (IPBS 3% BSA), followed by incubation at 37°C for 90 min with the mixture of the anti-HA and anti–PTP-SL primary antibodies. After washing with IPBS, cells were incubated for 1 h at room temperature with a mixture of the anti-rabbit fluorescein isothiocyanate– and the anti-mouse tetramethylrhodamine B isothiocyanate–conjugated secondary antibodies, followed by washing with IPBS and mounting.
PTP-SL and STEP tyrosine phosphatases contain a conserved KIM in their cytosolic noncatalytic regions that mediates association with MAP kinases (Pulido et al. 1998). Since a consensus phosphorylation sequence for PKA occurs within the KIM (Arg228Arg229Gly230Ser231; amino acid numbering is according to PTP-SL; Hendriks et al. 1995), the phosphorylation of these two phosphatases by PKA was tested. GST-PTP-SL or -STEP fusion proteins, were incubated in vitro with cPKA in the presence of γ-[32P]ATP, followed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. As shown, a strong phosphorylation of the PTP-SL and STEP fusion proteins was detected (Fig. 1 A, lanes 2–4), whereas no phosphorylation took place with GST alone or a GST fusion protein containing a nonrelated PTP (Fig. 1 A, lanes 1 and 5), indicating that PTP-SL and STEP are substrates of PKA. Substitution by alanine of the Ser231 residue (S231A mutant), abolished the phosphorylation of PTP-SL by cPKA (Fig. 1 A, lanes 8 and 10), demonstrating that this residue is the target of the kinase. Next, the in vivo phosphorylation of PTP-SL upon PKA activation conditions was investigated. Phosphorus 32 labeling was carried out on COS-7 cells transfected with plasmids encoding transmembrane (PTP-SL 1-549) or nontransmembrane (PTP-SL 147-549) PTP-SL isoforms, followed by treatment with PKA activators and immunoprecipitation with anti–PTP-SL antibody. Incubation in the presence of the cAMP analogous dibutyryl-cAMP or the adenylate cyclase activator forskolin increased the phosphorylation of wild-type PTP-SL isoforms (Fig. 1 B, lanes 3, 4, and 8), but not of the S231A mutants (Fig. 1 B, lanes 6 and 10). Interestingly, the basal levels of phosphorylation were greatly diminished in the S231A mutants (Fig. 1 B, lanes 5 and 9) compared with the wild-type PTP-SL (Fig. 1 B, lanes 2 and 7), indicating that PKA phosphorylates this residue under the normal cell growth conditions of COS-7 cells. Furthermore, cell treatment with the PP2A serine/threonine phosphatase inhibitor, okadaic acid (1 μM), induced the hyperphosphorylation of wild-type PTP-SL, but not of the S231A mutant (Fig. 1 B, lanes 11–14). These results demonstrate that the Ser231 residue of PTP-SL is a substrate of PKA, and suggest a role for PP2A in the in vivo dephosphorylation of such a residue.
Next, the effect of PTP-SL phosphorylation by PKA on its association with MAP kinases was analyzed. GST-PTP-SL fusion proteins were phosphorylated in vitro by cPKA as above, in the presence of cold ATP, and the fusion proteins were incubated with Rat-1 cell lysates and precipitated with glutathione-Sepharose. Samples were resolved by SDS-PAGE and the presence of the MAP kinases ERK1/2 or p38α was detected by immunoblot using specific antibodies. Remarkably, the phosphorylation of GST-PTP-SL wild type by cPKA abrogated its association with both ERK1/2 and p38α (Fig. 2 A, lane 2); however, no changes were observed with the GST-PTP-SL S231A mutant upon incubation with cPKA (Fig. 2 A, lanes 4 and 5). To test the effect of PTP-SL phosphorylation by PKA on the association with the MAP kinases in vivo, GST-PTP-SL fusion proteins were overexpressed in 293 cells and precipitated in one-step with glutathione-Sepharose, followed by immunoblot analysis, as above. Treatment of cells with dibutyryl-cAMP or forskolin resulted in the lack of coprecipitation of ERK1/2 or HA-p38α with PTP-SL (Fig. 2 B, lanes 2 and 3); however, in dibutyryl-cAMP–treated cells that were preincubated with the PKA inhibitor H89, normal levels of association with the kinases were detected (Fig. 2 B, lane 4). Finally, the coprecipitation of ERK1/2 and p38α with the PTP-SL S231E mutant, which mimics a phosphorylated Ser231 residue, was also tested. As shown, these MAP kinases did not associate in 293 cells with overexpressed GST-PTP-SL S231E (Fig. 2 C, lane 5), whereas association was efficiently detected with the GST-PTP-SL wild type, the S231A mutant or the C480S catalytically inactive mutant (Fig. 2 C, lanes 3, 4, and 6). The functional consequences of the phosphorylation of the Ser231 residue of PTP-SL, on the dephosphorylation of ERK1/2 and p38α by the phosphatase, were analyzed using the S231E PTP-SL mutant. GST-PTP-SL wild type or S231E fusion proteins were mixed with pellets containing activated HA-ERK2 or HA-p38α, and phosphatase assays were carried out, followed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblot with the anti–phosphotyrosine 4G10 mAb. As shown, the tyrosine dephosphorylation of HA-ERK2 and HA-p38α by GST-PTP-SL S231E mutant was impaired compared with that shown by GST-PTP-SL wild type, whereas equal activities of both fusion proteins were measured towards the nonspecific p-NPP substrate (Fig. 2 D and data not shown). These findings demonstrate that phosphorylation of the Ser231 residue of PTP-SL by PKA inhibits its association with ERK1/2 and p38α, and the subsequent tyrosine dephosphorylation of these MAP kinases.
PTP-SL retains ERK2 in the cytoplasm in a KIM-dependent manner (Zúñiga et al. 1999). To study the effect of phosphorylation of PTP-SL by PKA on its ability to retain MAP kinases outside of the nucleus, immunofluorescence analysis was performed on COS-7 cells cotransfected with HA-ERK2 or HA-p38α, and PTP-SL. Overexpression of HA-ERK2 or HA-p38α alone resulted in their accumulation in the nucleus (see Fig. 4 A; and data not shown); however, in the presence of PTP-SL, the nuclear accumulation of these kinases was abolished, colocalizing with the phosphatase outside of the nucleus (Fig. 3 and Fig. 4 A). Interestingly, neither the PTP activity nor the PTP domain of PTP-SL itself was required to retain HA-ERK2 outside of the nucleus, as observed by coexpression with PTP-SL catalytically inactive mutants (C480S or R486M) or with truncated PTP-SL forms lacking the PTP domain (PTP-SL 1-288) (Fig. 4 A). On the other hand, upon coexpression with the PTP-SL S231E mutant, the cytoplasmic retention of HA-ERK2 or HA-p38α was significantly reduced, as compared with wild-type PTP-SL (Fig. 4B and Fig. C). Also, when cells coexpressing wild-type PTP-SL and HA-ERK2 or HA-p38α were treated with dibutyryl-cAMP, the nuclear localization of both MAP kinases was partially restored, and such an effect was prevented by cell preincubation with H89 (Fig. 4B and Fig. C). However, no effect was observed upon cell treatment with agents that activate other kinase pathways, such as EGF or PMA (data not shown). Furthermore, cotransfection with an inducible expression vector coding the Cα catalytic subunit of PKA (cPKAα), also favored the nuclear localization of these MAP kinases in the presence of PTP-SL (Fig. 4B and Fig. C). Remarkably, the effect of PKA activation on the colocalization of HA-ERK2 and HA-p38α with wild-type PTP-SL was not observed with the PTP-SL S231A mutant (Fig. 4B and Fig. C), demonstrating that phosphorylation of the Ser231 residue of PTP-SL by PKA inhibits the in vivo association of PTP-SL with HA-ERK2 and HA-p38α, and favors the nuclear translocation of these kinases.
PKA modulates the activity of MAP kinases in a cell type– and stimulus-specific manner by interfering with upstream events from signaling cascades activated through distinct Ras-like GTPases, including Ras, Rap1, and RalGDS (Vossler et al. 1997; Miller et al. 1998). In addition, PKA activity favors the nuclear translocation of ERK1/2 in PC12 and hippocampal neurons, as well as in presynaptic sensory neurons from Aplysia (Impey et al. 1998; Martin et al. 1998; Yao et al. 1998). Our results, showing a crosstalk between the PKA and ERK1/2 and p38α kinases through the tyrosine phosphatase PTP-SL, support the existence of a novel mechanism by which PKA can regulate the activity of the MAP kinases and their translocation to the nucleus (Fig. 5). Such a mechanism would involve the existence, in certain cell types, of a pool of inactive MAP kinases outside of the nucleus, which would be complexed with PTP-SL or other KIM-containing PTPs, including STEP and HePTP (see below). The dissociation equilibrium of the complex would depend upon the cell type– and the stimulus-specific conditions of PKA activity, and the lack of association would be favored by the PKA-mediated phosphorylation of the KIM regulatory residue on the PTP. Thus, upon conditions of PKA activation, both the tyrosine phosphorylation and the entry into the nucleus of the MAP kinases would be prevalent. It should be noted that the expression of PTP-SL and related isoforms is restricted to specialized areas of the brain, including the Purkinje cells in the postnatal cerebellum (Watanabe et al. 1998; van den Maagdenberg et al. 1999), suggesting the possibility of a differential regulation of MAP kinase functions by PTP-SL and PKA during brain development.
The mutational analysis of the KIM of PTP-SL has revealed that the residues involved in the PKA phosphorylation consensus sequence are also crucial for the docking of this phosphatase with ERK1/2 (Zúñiga et al. 1999). Such residues are conserved between the related tyrosine phosphatases PTP-SL, STEP, and HePTP, which have been found to associate with MAP kinases and regulate their activation (Pulido et al. 1998; Oh-hora et al. 1999; Saxena et al. 1999a). In this regard, while writing this manuscript, Saxena et al. 1999b have reported the negative role of PKA phosphorylation of the KIM of HePTP in the physical and functional association of HePTP with MAP kinases. Also, a tyrosine phosphatase from Drosophila, PTP-ER, has been found that inactivates MAP kinase, and that contains three KIMs with consensus phosphorylation sites for PKA (Karim and Rubin 1999). Finally, we have found that the retention of ERK2 outside of the nucleus is efficiently achieved by PTP-SL catalytically inactive mutants, as well as by truncated PTP-SL molecules lacking the PTP domain, demonstrating that this domain is dispensable in a such process. Thus, PKA-mediated KIM phosphorylations could have diverse regulatory effects on MAP kinase functions, depending on the functional properties of the affected KIM-containing molecule.
The involvement of distinct kinases in the in vivo phosphorylation of PTP-SL is likely to exist, which ultimately could control the biological functions of this PTP. Thus, the Thr253 residue of PTP-SL is phosphorylated in vivo by ERK1/2 upon EGF cell treatment in a manner dependent of docking through the KIM (Pulido et al. 1998). Furthermore, the Thr253 residue is also a putative PKC phosphorylation site, and PTP-SL is phosphorylated in vitro by this kinase (our unpublished observations). In this context, the binding of MAP kinases to the KIM of PTP-SL could mask the PKA phosphorylation motif by steric hindrance, hampering the phosphorylation of PTP-SL by PKA; conversely, phosphorylation of the KIM by PKA difficult the association of MAP kinases and the subsequent phosphorylation of the Thr253 residue. The results presented here indicate a major regulatory role on the PTP-SL functions for the PKA-mediated phosphorylation of the Ser231 residue; accordingly, the basal phosphorylation of PTP-SL in COS-7 cells is found predominantly in such residue (Fig. 1 B). On the other hand, the functional significance of the phosphorylation of the Thr253 residue by ERK1/2 remains elusive. The possibility exists that phosphorylation of Thr253 regulates the dissociation of PTP-SL from MAP kinases, as it has been suggested for HePTP (Saxena et al. 1999a). However, the cytoplasmic retention of ERK2 by PTP-SL was efficiently achieved upon conditions of EGF-induced phosphorylation of Thr253 (our unpublished observations). In addition, phosphorylation of this residue could account for the regulated binding of PTP-SL to other unidentified molecules. The participation of specific serine/threonine phosphatases in the in vivo dephosphorylation of the Ser231 and Thr253 residues of PTP-SL is also expected. In this regard, we have found that cell treatment with okadaic acid induces hyperphosphorylation of the Ser231 residue, suggesting an active role for PP2A in the in vivo dephosphorylation of this key residue (Fig. 5). Also, PP2A and PP2C have been shown to interfere with the activation of the MAP kinase pathways by affecting the phosphorylation of MAP kinases or upstream phosphorylation events (Anderson et al. 1990; Chajry et al. 1996; Takekawa et al. 1998). Thus, a complex network of kinases and phosphatases could be envisioned within the MAP kinase pathways, which integrate the different signals to generate specific cell responses. The importance of the assembly of the molecular components that regulate the activation of the MAP kinases has been recently outlined (Whitmarsh and Davis 1998; Schaeffer and Weber 1999). The results reported here point to PKA as a major regulator of the physical and functional association between the ERK1/2 and p38α kinases and their inactivating tyrosine phosphatases.
We thank G.S. McKnight, J. Pouysségur, and A. Ullrich (Max-Planck Institut für Biochemie, Martinsried, Germany) for providing plasmids and reagents, Á. Zúñiga and E. Knecht for helpful discussions, and I. Roglá (all from Instituto de Investigaciones Citológicas, Valencia, Spain) for technical assistance.
This work was supported by grants from Ministerio de Educación y Cultura (PB96-0278) and Generalitat Valenciana (GV-C-VS-20-047-96). C. Blanco-Aparicio and J. Torres were supported by fellowships from Bancaja and Instituto de Investigaciones Citológicas, respectively.
C. Blanco-Aparicio and J. Torres contributed equally to this work.
Abbreviations used in this paper: cPKA, PKA catalytic subunit; ERK, extracellular signal–regulated kinase; GST, glutathione-S-transferase; HA, hemagglutinin; JNK, c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase; KIM, kinase interaction motif; MAP, mitogen-activated protein; PKA, protein kinase A; PKC, protein kinase C; PTP, protein tyrosine phosphatase.