PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jroyalcgpracBJGP at RCGPBJGP at PubMed CentralJ R Coll Gen Pract at PubMed CentralRCGP homepage
 
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1978 December; 28(197): 747, 750-751.
PMCID: PMC2158982

A follow-up survey of patients with dyspepsia in one general practice

Abstract

Eighty-three patients who had been investigated by cholecystogram, barium meal and fibreoptic endoscopy more than two years previously were interviewed to enquire into their reactions to the investigations carried out, their present symptoms, and their present smoking and alcohol consumption. Comparisons were made with previously recorded observations. Those who still complained of severe dyspepsia were asked to attend for a repeat endoscopy. Sixty-three per cent of patients were asymptomatic; 13 per cent had recurrent dyspepsia, and 24 per cent had persistent dyspepsia. Thirty-nine per cent of smokers were found to have stopped altogether following medical advice.

Both radiological and endoscopic methods of investigation proved acceptable. A majority of patients preferred endoscopy to barium meal.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (412K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Barnes RJ, Gear MW, Nicol A, Dew AB. Study of dyspepsia in a general practice as assessed by endoscopy and radiology. Br Med J. 1974 Oct 26;4(5938):214–216. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Cotton PB. Fibreoptic endoscopy and the barium meal--results and implications. Br Med J. 1973 Apr 21;2(5859):161–165. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Gregory DW, Davies GT, Evans KT, Rhodes J. Natural history of patients with x-ray-negative dyspepsia in general practice. Br Med J. 1972 Dec 2;4(5839):519–520. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners