PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jroyalcgpracBJGP at RCGPBJGP at PubMed CentralJ R Coll Gen Pract at PubMed CentralRCGP homepage
 
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1977 April; 27(177): 236–240.
PMCID: PMC2157994

A comparison of three systems of classifying presenting problems in general practice

Abstract

Three internationally recognized systems have been devised for classifying presenting problems in general practice. They are: the Royal College of General Practitioners' (1963) classification, the US Ambulatory Medical Care Classification of Symptoms (NAMCS), and the World Organization of Colleges and Academies of General Practice/Family Medicine (WONCA, 1976) classification which is known as An International Classification of Health Problems of Primary Care (ICHPPC).

These three systems were compared in over 8,000 consultations conducted by 81 randomly selected British general practitioners in Nottinghamshire.

For all ages of patient, the NAMCS, which has only 197 categories, was the most specific, and the least specific was the classification of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (865K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Bain ST, Spaulding WB. The importance of coding presenting symptoms. Can Med Assoc J. 1967 Oct 14;97(16):953–959. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Clark EM. Problem orientated records. Disease coding in a problem oriented general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1974 Jul;24(144):469–475. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Colley JR, Douglas JW, Reid DD. Respiratory disease in young adults: influence of early childhood lower respiratory tract illness, social class, air pollution, and smoking. Br Med J. 1973 Jul 28;3(5873):195–198. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Elinson J. Introduction to the theme: sociomedical health indicators. Int J Health Serv. 1976;6(3):385–391. [PubMed]
  • Hulka BS, Kupper LL, Cassel JC. Determinants of physician utilization: approach to a service-oriented classification of symptoms. Med Care. 1972 Jul-Aug;10(4):300–309. [PubMed]
  • Hurtado AV, Greenlick MR. A disease classification system for analysis of medical care utilization, with a note on symptom classification. Health Serv Res. 1971 Fall;6(3):235–250. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • McFarlane AH, Norman GR. Ambulatory medical care data: methods for classifying symptoms, complaints, and conditions. Med Care. 1973 Mar-Apr;11(2 Suppl):101–108. [PubMed]
  • McFarlane AH, O'Connell BP. Morbidity in family practice. Can Med Assoc J. 1969 Sep 6;101(5):259–263. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Morrell DC, Gage HG, Robinson NA. Symptoms in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1971 Jan;21(102):32–43. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Morris JN, Kagan A, Pattison DC, Gardner MJ. Incidence and prediction of ischaemic heart-disease in London busmen. Lancet. 1966 Sep 10;2(7463):553–559. [PubMed]
  • Murnaghan JH. Ambulatory medical care data. Report of the Conference on Ambulatory Medical Care Records: review of the conference proceedings. Med Care. 1973 Mar-Apr;11(2 Suppl):13–34. [PubMed]
  • Pedoe HT, Clayton D, Morris JN, Brigden W, McDonald L. Coronary heart-attacks in East London. Lancet. 1975 Nov 1;2(7940):833–838. [PubMed]
  • REID DD, ANDERSON DO, FERRIS BG, FLETCHER CM. AN ANGLO-AMERICAN COMPARISON OF THE PREVALENCE OF BRONCHITIS. Br Med J. 1964 Dec 12;2(5423):1487–1491. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Weed LL. Medical records that guide and teach. N Engl J Med. 1968 Mar 21;278(12):652–concl. [PubMed]

Articles from The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners