PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jroyalcgpracBJGP at RCGPBJGP at PubMed CentralJ R Coll Gen Pract at PubMed CentralRCGP homepage
 
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1975 June; 25(155): 456–461.
PMCID: PMC2157576

The relationship of urinary symptoms to significant bacteriuria

Abstract

Selected samples of healthy people (804 males, 796 non-pregnant females and 400 pregnant women) were questioned about present and previous urinary symptoms. Mid-stream specimens of urine were cultured quantitatively. Symptoms in the males occurred more frequently in the presence of `significant bacteriuria', but the numbers were too small to allow statistical analysis. Among the non-pregnant females frequency or burning micturition was found more frequently in those who had significant bacteriuria than in those whose urinary bacterial counts were low; for nocturia this difference was statistically significant (p <0·001).

Of the pregnant women, comparison of those who had significant bacteriuria with those whose urine was normal showed that diurnal and nocturnal frequency, and loin pain, occurred more frequently in those with significant bacteriuria (for each of these symptoms p <0·0.1).

These results suggest that the recent onset of nocturia is the most reliable symptom of urinary tract infection. There remain, however, many people with urinary symptoms and with low urinary bacterial counts in whom other causes for the symptoms should be sought.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (925K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Asscher AW. Screening for urinary tract infection. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1970 Apr;4(3):219–226. [PubMed]
  • Eastwood NB, Bruce RG, Wren WJ. Prevalence of inflammation of the urinary tract. J Coll Gen Pract. 1965 Nov;10(3):257–260. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lawson DH, Clarke A, McFarlane DB, McAllister TA, Linton AL. Urinary tract symptomatology in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1973 Aug;23(133):548–555. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • MANNERS T. A new counting chamber for the eosinophil count. J Clin Pathol. 1952 Feb;5(1):111–111. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • MOND NC. DISCUSSION ON URINARY INFECTIONS. Practitioner. 1964 Jun;192:817–818. [PubMed]
  • MONTO AS, RANTZ LA. THE DEVELOPMENT AND CHARACTER OF BACTERIURIA IN PREGNANCY. EXPERIENCE WITH A NONINDIGENT POPULATION. Ann Intern Med. 1963 Aug;59:186–193. [PubMed]
  • PRESCOTT LF, BRODIE DE. A SIMPLE DIFFERENTIAL STAIN FOR URINARY SEDIMENT. Lancet. 1964 Oct 31;2(7366):940–940. [PubMed]
  • PRYLES CV, LUDERS D, ALKAN MK. A comparative study of bacterial cultures and colony counts in paired specimens of urine obtained by catheter versus voiding from normal infants and infants with urinary tract infection. Pediatrics. 1961 Jan;27:17–28. [PubMed]
  • Steensberg J, Bartels ED, Bay-Nielsen H, Fanoe E, Hede T. Epidemiology of urinary tract diseases in general practice. Br Med J. 1969 Nov 15;4(5680):390–394. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • STERNHEIMER R, MALBIN B. Clinical recognition of pyelonephritis, with a new stain for urinary sediments. Am J Med. 1951 Sep;11(3):312–323. [PubMed]
  • Sussman M, Asscher AW, Waters WE, Evans JA, Campbell H, Evans KT, Williams JE. Asymptomatic significant bacteriuria in the non-pregnant woman. I. Description of a population. Br Med J. 1969 Mar 29;1(5647):799–803. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Waters WE, Elwood PC, Asscher AW, Abernethy M. Clinical significance of dysuria in women. Br Med J. 1970 Jun 27;2(5712):754–757. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners