PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of cytotechspringer.comThis journalToc AlertsSubmit OnlineOpen Choice
 
Cytotechnology. Jan 2008; 56(1): 57–67.
Published online Nov 14, 2007. doi:  10.1007/s10616-007-9108-x
PMCID: PMC2151964

Separation of CHO cells using hydrocyclones

Abstract

Hydrocyclones are simple and robust separation devices with no moving parts. In the past few years, their use in animal cell separation has been proposed. In this work, the use of different hydrocyclone configurations for Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell separation was investigated following an experimental design. It was shown that cell separation efficiencies for cultures of the wild-type CHO.K1 cell line and of a recombinant CHO cell line producing granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) were kept above 97%. Low viability losses were observed, as measured by trypan blue exclusion and by determination of intracellular lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) released to the culture medium. Mathematical models were proposed to predict the flow rate, flow ratio and separation efficiency as a function of hydrocyclone geometry and pressure drop. When cells were monitored for any induction of apoptosis upon passage through the hydrocyclones, no increase in apoptotic cell concentration was observed within 48 h of hydrocycloning. Thus, based on the high separation efficiencies, the robustness of the equipment, and the absence of apoptosis induction, hydrocyclones seem to be specially suited for use as cell retention devices in long-term perfusion runs.

Keywords: Animal cells, Cell separation, CHO cells, Hydrocyclones, Perfusion, Retention device

Introduction

Animal cells are widely used for the production of biopharmaceuticals, monoclonal antibodies and vaccines. Continuous animal cell culture processes with cell retention, commonly known as perfusion processes, are characterized by constant fresh medium supply and removal of exhausted medium. Cell retention devices are employed for the separation of cells from spent medium. Thus, the combination of continuous nutrient feeding, metabolites removal and cell retention allows high-cell-density cultures (greater than 107 cells/mL) and high productivities (usually at least 10-fold higher than in batch cultures) to be obtained (Woodside et al. 1998; Castilho and Medronho 2002). However, the main concern in perfusion cultures is the technique employed to separate cells from the spent medium. Animal cell separation from the liquid medium is a difficult task because cells are sensitive to mechanical stress, have diameters in the range of 8–40 μm and densities of 1.05–1.14 g/cm3, resulting in very low terminal settling velocities (Medronho 2003).

Adequate cell retention devices must present features such as high separation efficiency, long-term stable operation, no induction of death mechanisms and, preferentially, good resolution in separating viable from non-viable cells. However, the high protein titer in most cell culture media, associated to the small size and density of the cells, causes drawbacks in most of the conventional retention devices (Kretzmer 2002).

Different devices have been used to perform cell retention in bioreactors, but several limitations have been observed. Filtration-based techniques present problems of filter fouling after a relatively short period of operation (Kawahara et al. 1994; Van Reis and Zydney 2001). Centrifuges may suffer from cell adhesion and clogging, besides their high mechanical complexity and high cost (Jäger 1992; Tokashiki et al. 1990). Sedimentation-based apparatuses are susceptible to cell adhesion, and the high residence time needed to perform the separation exposes the cells to non-controlled environments (Searles et al. 1994; Voisard et al. 2003). Thus, special operation strategies like back-pulsing, to prevent cell build-up at the drain ports, and refrigeration systems, to induce cell aggregation and so enhance particle sedimentation, have to be employed (Lipscomb et al. 2004).

Hydrocyclones have been proposed in the recent years to promote animal cell separation in batch and perfusion processes (Lübberstedt et al. 2000a, b; Jockwer et al. 2001). These separation devices present several advantages for use in the biotechnology industry, such as their simplicity and reliability, as well as the absence of moving parts. Furthermore, for cell separation applications, hydrocyclones would require no maintenance, allowing long-term continuous operation of perfusion bioreactors (Castilho and Medronho 2002).

Previous works using three different commercially available hydrocyclones showed motivating results (Lübberstedt et al.2000a, b). The best performance was obtained with a 10-mm Dorr-Oliver hydrocyclone, resulting in a separation efficiency of 81%. These experimental values agree with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) predictions that high levels of separation efficiencies for mammalian cells could be achieved with small-diameter hydrocyclones (Medronho et al. 2005). Since the preservation of high cellular viabilities is one main concern regarding animal cell retention devices, Lübberstedt et al. (2000a) also analyzed the influence of pressure drop on HeLa cell viability. It was shown that cell viability in the concentrated stream (underflow) remained constant for pressure drops varying in the range of 1–4 bar, while the diluted stream (overflow) presented viability losses for pressure drops above 3 bar. Although the shear stress levels inside hydrocyclones are relatively high, the residence times of the cells inside the equipment are very short (in the range of fractions of seconds), specially for those cells being separated in the underflow concentrated cell stream, which is the stream that is recycled to the bioreactor in a perfusion culture. Jockwer et al. (2001) studied hydrocyclones specially designed for animal cell separation and were able to successfully carry out a 23-day perfusion culture in a 5-L bioreactor with CHO (Chinese hamster ovary) cells.

The present work investigates the use of different geometries of hydrocyclones that were specially designed for animal cell separation. The separation efficiency of CHO cells, as well as flow rates and cell viability were evaluated. Furthermore, mid-term tests for evaluating if any induction of apoptosis occurred were carried out with the parental CHO.K1 cell line and a recombinant one.

Materials and methods

Cell lines and cultivation conditions

The CHO.K1 (Chinese hamster ovary) cell line, obtained from DSMZ (German Collection for Microrganisms and Cell Cultures, Braunschweig, Germany), and a recombinant CHO cell line expressing human GM-CSF (granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor), gently provided by Laboratorio de Cultivos Celulares from Universidad Nacional del Litoral (Santa Fe, Argentina), were used. Cells were cultivated in spinner flasks up to a volume of 1 L, in a mixture (1:1) of DMEM and Ham’s F12 media, supplemented with 1% (CHO.K1) and 0.2% (CHO GM-CSF) fetal calf serum (FCS) (Cultilab, Campinas/SP, Brazil). The flasks were incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2 and stirred at 50 rpm.

Hydrocyclones

The hydrocyclones (HCs) tested in this work were specially designed to separate animal cells (Fig. 1). More details on their geometry can be obtained from Deckwer et al. (2005). Briefly, they have a double tangential inlet, a diameter (Dc) of 10.0 mm and a choice of two different underflow diameters (Du) (2.0 and 3.0 mm) and three different overflow diameters (Do) (1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 mm). Hence, six different geometries with varying underflow and overflow diameters were tested.

Fig. 1
(a) Photograph of the hydrocyclone specially designed for animal cell separation; (b) Schematic view of the fluid flow inside a hydrocyclone

Experimental set-up

The cell separation tests were carried out using a 20-L stainless-steel tank containing cell suspension from a 1-L spinner culture diluted to 20 L with PBS (pH 7.2) containing 0.9% NaCl (Fig. 2). The concentration of the cell suspensions fed to the hydrocyclones was in the range of 6–7 × 104 cells/mL. In each experiment, the stainless-steel tank was pressurized with compressed air up to the required pressure, forcing the cell suspension to the hydrocyclone. Underflow and overflow outlets were open at atmospheric pressure, and the flow rate through these orifices was measured to determine the flow ratio (Rf). Samples (50 mL) were collected from each outlet stream to determine cell concentration and viability. Before cell counting, the samples were concentrated 10-fold to reduce the experimental error.

Fig. 2
Experimental set-up of the 20-L stainless-steel tank with two manometers (1), cell suspension (2), a valve (3) and the hydrocyclone (4)

Further separation tests were carried out using hydrocyclone configurations 3020 (underflow diameter: 3.0 mm; overflow diameter: 2.0 mm) and 2010 (underflow diameter: 2.0 mm; overflow diameter: 1.0 mm) with the purpose of assessing the possible mid-term effects of hydrocycloning on cell viability. High-viability cell suspensions (>98%), cultured in 500-mL spinner flasks, were fed under sterile conditions to the hydrocyclones using a low-pulse peristaltic pump (Watson Marlow, model 520 U with pumphead 505 L), at a pressure drop of 1 bar. After one passage through the hydrocyclone, the underflow stream (cell-concentrated stream) was collected in a sterile spinner flask, which was incubated for 48 h. Samples were collected for evaluation of LDH, apoptosis and cell growth in intervals of 0, 3, 6, 24 and 48 h after passage through the hydrocyclone.

The cell separation efficiency E was calculated as the fraction of cells (in number) recovered in the underflow (Eq. 1) (Castilho and Medronho 2008):

equation M1
1

where Q and Qu are the flow rates and X and Xu are the cell concentrations, as cell number per unit volume, of the feed and concentrated streams, respectively.

The flow ratio Rf was evaluated using Eq. 2.

equation M2
2

The cell number balances (comparison of the amount of cells leaving the hydrocyclone through the underflow and overflow streams with the amount of cells fed to the equipment) closed satisfactorily, with an average deviation of ±9.9%, which is approximately the same deviation associated to the cell counting technique in Neubauer chambers used for quantification of cell concentration in the different streams.

Experimental design

A statistical experimental design was employed to evaluate the effects of three variables (overflow diameter, Do, underflow diameter, Du, and pressure drop, ΔP). A fractional factorial experimental design (23–1), shown in Table 1, was used, and allowed obtaining mathematical models describing the effects of each variable and of the interactions among them on the responses (separation efficiency, flow rate and flow ratio). Four additional experiments were added to assess the experimental error using the central points of Do and pressure drop. Statistical analysis of the results and mathematical modeling were accomplished with STATISTICA 6.0 (StatSoft, Tulsa, USA), using the non-linear parameter estimation module with least square objective function.

Table 1
Fractional factorial experimental design

Cell quantification and viability assays

Cell quantification was carried out using a haemocytometer and an optical microscope. Dead cells were determined by the trypan blue exclusion method (Kuchler 2000). Total cells were quantified by counting total cell nuclei (Sanford et al.1950).

Determination of cell size distribution

A particle size analyzer (Malvern Mastersizer) was used to determine cell size distribution of a suspension of CHO.K1 cells grown in 1% FCS.

Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity determination

After centrifugation of samples at 250g for 4 min, lactate dehydrogenase activity in supernatants was determined at room temperature by following the conversion of NADH to NAD+ by reduction of pyruvate to lactate, which is catalyzed by LDH. NADH concentration was measured at 340 nm (Racher et al. 1990). The reaction was initiated by the addition of 1 mL of supernatant to a mixture of 0.4 mL of 2.4 mM pyruvate and 0.025 mL of 6 mM NADH in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.2). One activity unit (U) is defined as the amount of enzyme that catalyzes the consumption of 1 μmol of NADH per minute, under the assay conditions.

Determination of apoptosis and necrosis

Normal, apoptotic and necrotic cells were determined according to visible aberrations of the chromatin using an epifluorescence microscope (Nikon, TS100F). Two fluorescent dyes that bind to DNA (acridine orange and ethidium bromide, both from Fluka) were used. 4 μL of a solution containing 100 μg/mL of each of both dyes was added to 100 μL culture suspension (5 × 105–5 × 106 cells/mL). The samples were examined using a 40× objective with epi-illumination and a combined filter-set for fluorescein (Mercille and Massie 1994). Five different cell physiological states were identified: viable non-apoptotic (VNA), viable apoptotic (VA), non-viable apoptotic (NVA), necrotic (NEC) and chromatin-free (CF).

Results and discussion

Influence of pressure drop and outlet diameters on hydrocyclone performance

CHO.K1 cell suspensions, previously grown in DMEM/F12 medium containing 1% FCS and presenting cell viability above 95%, were fed from a pressurized 20-L steel tank to the six different configurations of the specially designed hydrocyclones, at pressures of 1, 2 and 3 bar. The experiments followed a fractional factorial design. The hydrocyclone geometries 2015 (Du = 2.0 mm and Do = 1.5 mm) and 3015 (Du = 3.0 and Do = 1.5) were analyzed in duplicate to evaluate the experimental error. The results are shown in Table 2 in terms of feed flow rate (Q), flow ratio (Rf), total separation efficiency (E) and cell viability loss in the underflow stream (ΔVu = viability in the feed minus viability in the underflow).

Table 2
Separation of CHO.K1 cells grown in DMEM/F12 medium (1% FCS)

High cell separation efficiencies, varying from 97.9% to 99.9%, were obtained for 5 out of 6 hydrocyclone configurations. The geometry 3010 (Du = 3.0 mm and Do = 1.0 mm) presented a flow ratio of 100%, diverting the total feed flow to the underflow, indicating that this configuration is inappropriate to perform any kind of cell separation. Loss of viability was within the range of 2.9–9.1% for all configurations with exception of HC 2020, which presented a viability loss of 14.4%.

Hydrocyclone separation efficiencies for CHO.K1 cells shown in Table 2 are higher than the efficiencies obtained with other devices described in the literature. Wen et al. (2000) employed a two-step sequential sedimentation device for the retention of an IgG-producing hybridoma, achieving a separation efficiency of 88%. In CHO-cell perfusion cultures with spin-filters, the efficiencies attained were in the range of 75–95% (Iding et al. 2000), as compared to a minimum efficiency of 97.9% found for hydrocyclones in the present work. Furthermore, unlike hydrocyclones, fouling and clogging of spin-filter meshes is considered a major problem, which may cause premature interruption of the culture process (Esclade et al. 1991; Deo et al.1996; Voisard et al. 2003). Furthermore, when compared to other hydrocyclone geometries, the efficiencies found in the present work are higher than the best efficiency (81%) obtained for HeLa cells by Lübberstedt et al. (2000b). These authors used commercial hydrocyclones designed for conventional (non-biological) solid-liquid separations (a 7-mm Bradley, a 10-mm Mozley and a 10-mm Dorr-Oliver hydrocyclone), which have geometric proportions that are different from those of the hydrocyclones used in this work. These HCs were specially designed for the separation of animal cells (Deckwer et al. 2005) based on the knowledge of how geometric proportions of hydrocyclones affect separation efficiency (Table 3). A comparison of some geometric proportions of the hydrocyclone used in this work (Deckwer et al. 2005) with those of the HCs used by Lübberstedt et al. (2000a, b) is given in Table 4. According to Tables 3 and and4,4, a low Do/Dc range and a high Du/Dc range were chosen for the specially designed hydrocyclones with the aim of maximizing their separation efficiency.

Table 3
Effects of increases in the values of geometric and operational variables on the capacity (feed flow rate) and separation efficiency (Eq. 1) of hydrocyclones (+: increase, −: decrease). Adapted from Matta and Medronho (2000)
Table 4
Comparison of some geometrical proportions of the Bradley hydrocyclone family (Bradley and Pulling 1959), two commercial hydrocyclone designs (Richard Mozley Ltd., and FLSmidth Dorr-Oliver Eimco) and the hydrocyclone used in this work (Deckwer et al. ...

The viability losses found in the present work were slightly higher than those obtained with commercial Dorr-Oliver hydrocyclones for HeLa cells (Lübberstedt et al. 2000a), but lower than those obtained by Jockwer et al. (2001) for the separation of CHO cells cultured in serum-free medium, using the same type of hydrocyclone as in this work. Just in the case of HC 2020, viability loss was identical (14.4%) in this study and in that by Jockwer et al. (2001). These results suggest that there may be a difference between HeLa and CHO cells regarding sensitivity to shear generated inside hydrocyclones. Furthermore, comparing the present results with those obtained for CHO cells grown in serum-free medium (Jockwer et al. 2001), the data also suggest that the presence of seric proteins could be attenuating the effects of the hydrodynamic stress on cells maintained in serum-supplemented medium, as previously observed by Van Der Pol et al. (1990).

Suspension cultures of CHO.K1 cells naturally present aggregates that can be easily visualized. Using a Malvern particle size analyzer, the size distribution of CHO.K1 cells in the feed was determined (Fig. 3), and it was possible to identify two distinct populations with mean diameters of 12 μm, representing isolated cells, and 110 μm, indicating aggregates. Oxygen and nutrient diffusion inside these clumps is limited, creating inadequate conditions for the innermost cells, resulting in non-viable cells that cannot be detected by the trypan blue technique, which in turn leads to over-estimated viability values. However, due to the high shear rates inside the hydrocyclone, cell clump disaggregation could be an important factor leading to a decrease in cell culture viability that is rather apparent, since only individual cells or small clumps (3–6 cells) had been previously visualized and counted in the haemocytometer by the trypan blue technique. Some authors (Mercille et al. 1994; Castilho et al. 2002) have shown that DNAse treatment of CHO cell cultures can disaggregate cell clumps, significantly increasing the countable concentration of non-viable cells. Therefore, one important factor that may have influenced the increase in non-viable cell concentration in the underflow stream is the disaggregation of clumps. Visually, it was possible to observe that the number and size of cell clumps collected in the hydrocyclone underflow stream were lower than in the feed before hydrocycloning.

Fig. 3
(a) Size distribution of CHO.K1 cells cultured in spinner flasks in DMEM/F12 medium supplemented with 1% FCS. (b) Cell clumps stained with acridine orange and ethidium bromide observed under a fluorescence microscope

The results shown in Table 2 were also used to determine empiric mathematical models to describe separation efficiency (E), flow ratio (Rf), and flow rate (Q) as a function of the geometric variables (Du and Do) and the pressure drop (ΔP).

Equation 3 shows the model for separation efficiency (E), which presented a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.988. This correlation has the form of a typical polynomial equation, as commonly used in experimental design analyses, and only includes the terms that presented statistical significance.

equation M4
3

where Do and Du are in centimetres, ΔP in bar and Q in L min−1.

The models for flow ratio (Eq. 4) and flow rate (Eq. 5) presented correlation coefficients of 0.977 and 0.961, respectively. The structure of these equations was based on classical hydrocyclone models (Plitt 1976; Coelho and Medronho 2000).

equation M5
4
equation M6
5

where Do and Du are in centimetres, ΔP in bar and Q in L min−1.

Figure 4 compares the predicted values with the experimental data, considering a confidence level of 98%, for the efficiency, flow ratio and flow rate. These three models show that although the efficiencies were high in all cases, the flow rate and flow ratio varied considerably, resulting in important differences in overflow flow rate, for example. Thus, these models allow predicting the effects of changes in Do, Du and ΔP within the tested ranges on variables that are of great relevance in establishing e.g. a perfusion process, such as harvest flow rate.

Fig. 4
Separation of CHO.K1 cells. Experimental data versus data predicted by the models for: (a) separation efficiency; (b) flow ratio; (c) flow rate. Dotted lines show a confidence level of 98%

Mid-term effects of hydrocycloning on cell viability and apoptosis induction

In order to evaluate any mid-term effects of hydrocycloning on the cells, fluorescence microscopy with acridine orange and ethidium bromide was used as a sensitive technique to determine cell viability and to assess any possible induction of programmed cell death (apoptosis). Two hydrocyclone configurations (HC 3020 and HC 2010) were tested at 1 bar using a peristaltic pump, in order to mimic the set-up in a perfusion bioreactor. The CHO.K1 cell line was used in tests carried out with HC 3020 (Table 5) and in a control test, in which cell suspension was pumped through the test system without the hydrocyclone. This control test gave evidence that the pumping system had no significant influence on the cells (data not shown). Due to the good results observed in these tests, recombinant CHO cells expressing GM-CSF were also tested for separation efficiency, viability and apoptosis with HC 3020 and HC 2010 (Tables 6 and and7,7, respectively).

Table 5
CHO.K1 culture conditions before (“Culture”) and after (0, 3, 6, 24, 48 h) hydrocycloning (HC 3020) at a pressure drop of 1 bar
Table 6
CHO-GMCSF culture conditions before (“Culture”) and after (0, 3, 6, 24, 48 h) hydrocycloning (HC 3020) at a pressure drop of 1 bar
Table 7
CHO-GMCSF culture conditions before (“Culture”) and after (0, 3, 6, 24, 48 h) hydrocycloning (HC 2010) at a pressure drop of 1 bar

The separation of both cell lines with hydrocyclones was accomplished with high separation efficiencies (>97%) and low viability losses (<7%), maintaining cell culture viability above 92%. Previous studies have shown that some cell lines are susceptible to hydrodynamic stress, presenting a significant decrease in cell viability when subject to stress levels above a threshold limit (Born et al. 1992). However, due to the low viability drops observed in this work, the viability of CHO cells separated by hydrocyclones was kept above 92%, which is higher than the cell viability obtained for most cell retention devices reported by Voisard et al. (2003). In this review article, a compilation of 21 works using different cell retention devices showed that in only two cases cell viability was kept at values higher than the minimum viability (92%) obtained in the present work. In those two works cited by Voisard et al. (2003), the cell viability was 95%.

LDH activity released to the supernatant of the CHO.K1 culture (Fig. 5a) presented an increase up to 24 h after hydrocycloning, becoming stable within 48 h. For the recombinant cell line, rather stable values were observed between 0 and 24 h, with a tendency to decrease within 48 h (Fig. 5b and c). In all cases, the LDH values were in agreement with the trypan blue viability data, with increases in LDH activity released to the supernantant correlating to decreases in cell viability. These increases in LDH activity could also be related to the disaggregation of cell clumps, as discussed previously. Due to the break up of clumps upon hydrocycloning, dead cells become freely suspended in the medium, increasing the release of LDH to the supernatant.

Fig. 5
Cell viability and LDH activity in the supernatant before (“Culture”) and after (0, 3, 6, 24 and 48 h) hydrocycloning at a pressure drop of 1 bar: (a) CHO.K1 cells, HC 3020; (b) CHO-GMCSF cells, HC 3020; (c) CHO-GMCSF cells, HC ...

Samples collected from the overflow stream showed a lower viability and, thus, a higher relative amount of dead cells when compared to the underflow stream (samples designated “0 h” in Tables 57). These data give evidence that the hydrocyclones showed a preferential retention of viable cells, separating non-viable cells preferentially in the overflow stream, which in a perfusion run would be the harvest stream. Acoustic filters also presented preferential separation of viable hybridoma cells, and this was credited to the decrease of the mean diameter of dead cells (Batt et al. 1990; Lipscomb et al. 2004). However, it is probable in the present case that not only the alterations in size, but also the changes in density have influenced cell separation. Whereas apoptotic cells usually have a decreased size, it is known that necrotic cells are prone to experience an increase in size due to cell swelling after membrane breakdown (Al-Rubeai 1998; Buja et al. 1993). However, due to loss of intracellular components, the density of necrotic cells becomes lower than that of living cells. In both cases (decrease in diameter or in cell density), the terminal settling velocity of the cells decreases, favoring the separation of dead cells in the overflow stream. A similar behaviour has been observed in inclined settlers and Centritech centrifuges (Batt et al. 1990; Takagi et al. 2000; Lipscomb et al. 2004), which are equipment that also separate particles based on their terminal velocity.

The cells were also monitored within the first 48 h after passage through the hydrocyclone by fluorescence microscopy to evaluate any possible induction of apoptosis. According to the literature, exposure to high levels of hydrodynamic stress can induce cell death mechanisms such as apoptosis and necrosis, depending on its intensity and frequency (Al-Rubeai et al. 1995a, b). Analysis of cell samples taken along 48 h, upon labelling with ethidium bromide (BE) and acridine orange (AO), showed insignificant levels of apoptotic cells (Fig. 6). Thus, the present results indicate that the shear stress inside the hydrocyclones, combined to the short residence times of cells inside the equipment, does not induce apoptotic mechanisms. Considering that the apoptosis assay using fluorescence microscopy with BE/AO is significantly more sensitive than the trypan blue method, these results indicate that hydrocyclones can most probably be used as separation devices in long-term runs, e.g. in perfusion processes.

Fig. 6
Monitoring of cells before (“Culture”) and after hydrocycloning (0, 3, 6, 24 and 48 h): (a) CHO.K1 cells, HC 3020; (b) CHO-GMCSF, HC 3020; (c) CHO-GMCSF, HC 2010. VNA: viable non-apoptotic cells; VA: viable apoptotic cells; NVA: ...

Conclusions

In the present work, the separation of CHO cells with hydrocyclones was evaluated. The separation efficiencies attained in all cases were high (>97%), and low drops in cell viability were observed. Tests performed with two CHO cell lines (wild-type CHO.K1 and recombinant CHO-GMCSF) have suggested that apoptotic cell death mechanisms are not activated upon passage through the hydrocyclones tested. Furthermore, the results suggest the same behaviour for both cell lines, indicating that the expression of a heterologous protein has not affected cell sensitivity to the hydrodynamic stress generated inside the hydrocyclones. Due to the high separation efficiency, the absence of apoptosis induction and the lack of moving parts, it can be postulated that hydrocyclones are suitable devices for cell retention in perfusion bioreactors.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the Brazilian funding agencies CNPq, FAPERJ and FINEP for financial support.

Abbreviations

Dc
Hydrocyclone diameter (diameter of the cylindrical part)
Di
Inlet diameter
Do
Overflow diameter
Du
Underflow diameter
E
Separation efficiency
HC
Hydrocyclone
L
Hydrocyclone total length
equation M7
Vortex finder length
Q
Feed flow rate
Qu
Underflow flow rate
Rf
Flow ratio
X
Cell concentration
Xu
Underflow cell concentration
ΔP
Pressure drop
ΔVu
Viability loss (cell viability in the feed minus viability in the underflow stream)
θ
Angle of the conical part

References


  • Al-Rubeai M, Singh RP, Goldman MH, Emery AN (1995a) Death mechanisms of animal cells in conditions of intensive agitation. Biotechnol Bioeng 45:463–472. [PubMed]

  • Al-Rubeai M, Singh RP, Emery AN, Zhang Z (1995b) Cell cycle and cell size dependence of susceptibility to hydrodynamic forces. Biotechnol Bioeng 46:88–92. [PubMed]

  • Al-Rubeai M (1998) Apoptosis and cell culture technology. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 59:225–249. [PubMed]

  • Batt BC, Davis RH, Kompala DS (1990) Inclined sedimentation for selective retention of viable hybridomas in a continuous suspension bioreactor. Biotechnol Prog 6:458–464. [PubMed]

  • Born C, Zhang Z, Al-Rubeai M, Thomas CR (1992) Estimation of disruption of animal cells by laminar shear stress. Biotechnol Bioeng 40:1004–1010. [PubMed]

  • Bradley D, Pulling DJ (1959) Flow patterns in the hydraulic cyclone and their interpretation in terms of performance. Trans Inst Chem Eng 37:34–44.

  • Buja LM, Eigenbrodt ML, Eigenbrodt EH (1993) Apoptosis and necrosis. Basic types and mechanisms of cell death. Arch Pathol Lab Med 117:1208–1214. [PubMed]

  • Castilho LR, Anspach FB, Deckwer WD (2002) An integrated process for mammalian cell perfusion cultivation and product purification using a dynamic filter. Biotechnol Prog 18:776–781. [PubMed]

  • Castilho LR, Medronho RA (2002) Cell retention devices for suspended-cell perfusion cultures. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 74:129–169. [PubMed]
  • Castilho LR, Medronho RA (2008) Animal cell separation. In: Castilho LR, Augusto, EF Moraes AM, Butler M (eds) Animal cell technology: from biopharmaceuticals to gene therapy. Taylor & Francis, Andover.
  • Deckwer WD, Medronho RA, Anspach B, Lübberstedt M (2005) Method for separating viable cells from suspensions. US Patent 6,878,545 B2.

  • Deo YM, Mahadevan MD, Fuchs R (1996) Practical considerations in operation and scale-up of spinfilter based bioreactors for monoclonal antibody production. Biotechnol Prog 12:57–168. [PubMed]

  • Esclade LRJ, Carrel S, Peringer P (1991) Influence of the screen material on the fouling of spin filters. Biotechnol Bioeng 38:159–168. [PubMed]

  • Iding K, Lütkemeyer D, Fraune E (2000) Influence of alterations in culture conditions and changes in perfusion parameters on retention performance of a 20 μm spinfilter during a perfusion cultivation of a recombinant CHO cell line in pilot scale. Cytotechnology 14:141–200.

  • Jäger V (1992) A novel perfusion system for the large-scale cultivation of animal cells based on a continuous flow centrifuge. In: Spier RE, Griffiths JB, Macdonald C (eds) Animal cell technology: developments, processes and products. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp 397–402.

  • Jockwer A, Medronho RA, Wagner R, Anspach FB, Deckwer WD (2001) The use of hydrocyclones for mammalian cell retention in perfusion bioreactors. In: Olsson EL, Chatzissavidou N, Lüllau E (eds) Animal cell technology: from target to market. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 301–305.

  • Kawahara H, Mitsuda S, Kumazawa E, Takeshita Y (1994) High-density culture of FM-3A cells using a bioreactor with an external tangential-flow filtration device. Cytotechnology 14:61–110. [PubMed]

  • Kretzmer G (2002) Industrial processes with animal cells. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 59:135–142. [PubMed]

  • Kuchler RJ (2000) Biochemical methods in cell culture and virology. Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross Inc., Stroudsburg.

  • Lipscomb ML, Mowry MC, Kompala DS (2004) Production of a secreted glycoprotein from an inducible promoter system in a perfusion bioreactor. Biotechnol Prog 20:1402–1407. [PubMed]
  • Lübberstedt M, Medronho RA, Anspach FB, Deckwer WD (2000a) Separation of mammalian cells using hydrocyclones. In: Proceedings of biotechnology 2000—11th international biotechnology symposium and exhibition, vol 1. Dechema eV, Frankfurt am Main, pp 460–462.

  • Lübberstedt M, Medronho RA, Anspach FB, Deckwer WD (2000b) Abtrennung tierischer Zellen mit Hydrozyklonen. Chem Eng Technol 72:1089–1090.

  • Matta VM, Medronho RA (2000) A new method for yeast recovery in batch ethanol fermentations: filter aid filtration followed by separation of yeast from filter aid using hydrocyclones. Bioseparation 9:43–53. [PubMed]

  • Medronho RA (2003) Solid-liquid separation. In: Mattiasson B, Hatti-Kaul R (eds) Isolation and purification of proteins. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, pp 131–190.

  • Medronho RA, Schuetze J, Deckwer W-D (2005) Numerical simulation of hydrocyclones for cell separation. Lat Am Appl Res 35:1–8.

  • Mercille S, Massie B (1994) Induction of apoptosis in nutrient-deprived cultures of hybridoma and myeloma cells. Biotechol Bioeng 44:1140–1154.

  • Mercille S, Johnson M, Lemieux R, Massie B (1994) Filtration-based perfusion of hybridoma cultures in protein-free medium: reduction of membrane fouling by medium supplementation with DNAse 1. Biotechnol Bioeng 43:833–846. [PubMed]

  • Plitt LR (1976) A mathematical model of the hydrocyclone classifier. CIM Bull 69:114–123.

  • Racher AJ, Looby DE, Griffiths JB (1990) Use of lactate dehydrogenase release to assess changes in culture viability. Cytotechnology 3:301–307. [PubMed]

  • Sanford KK, Earle WR, Evans VJ, Waltz HK, Shannon JE (1950) The measurement of proliferation in tissue cultures by enumeration of cell nuclei. J Nat Cancer Inst 11:773–795. [PubMed]

  • Searles JA, Todd P, Kompala DS (1994) Viable cell recycle with an inclined settler in the perfusion culture of suspended recombinant Chinese hamster ovary cells. Biotechnol Prog 10:198–206. [PubMed]

  • Takagi M, Ilias M, Yoshida T (2000) Selective retension of active cells employing low centrifugal force at the medium change during suspension culture of chinese hamster ovary cells producing t-PA. J Biosci Bioeng 89:340–344. [PubMed]

  • Tokashiki M, Arai T, Hamamoto K (1990) High density culture of hybridoma cells using a perfusion culture vessel with an external centrifuge. Cytotechnology 3:239–244. [PubMed]

  • Van Der Pol L, Zijlstra G, Thalen M, Tramper J (1990) Effect of serum concentration on production of monoclonal antibodies and on shear sensitivity of a hybridoma. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 5:241–245.

  • Van Reis R, Zydney A (2001) Membrane separation in biotechnology. Curr Opin Biotechnol 12:208–211. [PubMed]

  • Voisard D, Meuwly F, Ruffieux PA, Baer G, Kadouri A (2003) Potential cell retention techniques for large-scale high-density perfusion culture of suspended mammalian cells. Biotechnol Bioeng 92:752–765.

  • Wen ZY, Teng XW, Chen F (2000) A novel perfusion system for animal cell cultures by two step sequential sedimentation. J Biotechnol 79:1–11. [PubMed]

  • Woodside SM, Bowen BD, Piret JM (1998) Mammalian cell retention devices for stirred perfusion bioreactors. Cytotechnology 28:163–175.

Articles from Cytotechnology are provided here courtesy of Springer Science+Business Media B.V.