Antiribosomal-P autoantibodies from psychiatric lupus target a novel neuronal surface protein causing calcium influx and apoptosis

doi:10.1084/jem.20071285

J Exp Med. 2007 December 24; 204(13): 3221–3234.

doi: 10.1084/jem.20071285

PMCID: PMC2150977

Article

Antiribosomal-P autoantibodies from psychiatric lupus target a novel neuronal surface protein causing calcium influx and apoptosis

Soledad Matus,^1,^2,⁴ Patricia V. Burgos,^1,^2,⁴ Marcela Bravo-Zehnder,^1,^2,⁴ Regine Kraft,⁶ Omar H. Porras,⁵ Paula Farías,³ L. Felipe Barros,⁵ Fernando Torrealba,³ Loreto Massardo,¹ Sergio Jacobelli,¹ and Alfonso González^1,^2,⁴

¹Departamento de Inmunología Clínica y Reumatología, Facultad de Medicina, ²Centro de Regulación Celular y Patología, and ³Departamento de Fisiología, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8330025, Chile

⁴Millennium Institute for Fundamental and Applied Biology, Santiago 7780272, Chile

⁵Centro de Estudios Científicos, Casilla 1469, Valdivia, Chile

⁶Max-Delbrück-Center, 13092 Berlin, Germany

CORRESPONDENCE Alfonso González: agonzara/at/med.puc.cl

Received June 25, 2007; Accepted November 6, 2007.

This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.

Abstract

The interesting observation was made 20 years ago that psychotic manifestations in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus are associated with the production of antiribosomal-P protein (anti-P) autoantibodies. Since then, the pathogenic role of anti-P antibodies has attracted considerable attention, giving rise to long-term controversies as evidence has either contradicted or confirmed their clinical association with lupus psychosis. Furthermore, a plausible mechanism supporting an anti-P–mediated neuronal dysfunction is still lacking. We show that anti-P antibodies recognize a new integral membrane protein of the neuronal cell surface. In the brain, this neuronal surface P antigen (NSPA) is preferentially distributed in areas involved in memory, cognition, and emotion. When added to brain cellular cultures, anti-P antibodies caused a rapid and sustained increase in calcium influx in neurons, resulting in apoptotic cell death. In contrast, astrocytes, which do not express NSPA, were not affected. Injection of anti-P antibodies into the brain of living rats also triggered neuronal death by apoptosis. These results demonstrate a neuropathogenic potential of anti-P antibodies and contribute a mechanistic basis for psychiatric lupus. They also provide a molecular target for future exploration of this and other psychiatric diseases.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multisystemic autoimmune disease characterized by a wide range of clinical manifestations and the production of a variety of autoantibodies frequently directed against intracellular components (1). In most cases, the relationship between particular autoantibodies and disease manifestations is obscure. This is especially true for the abnormalities of the central nervous system (CNS). Neuropsychiatric (NP) symptoms or cognitive decline can be found in different series affecting a range from 6 to 95% of the patients (2–5). The CNS compromise varies from mild to severe but can be the most devastating manifestation of the disease, often being difficult to diagnose and treat (3, 6–9). In contrast with focal organic brain syndromes, such as strokes and seizures resulting from thrombotic and vasculitic alterations, the pathogenic mechanisms of diffuse brain manifestations such as mood and anxiety disorders or psychosis, as well as cognitive dysfunction, remain largely unknown (3, 8). Even without overt CNS symptoms, the brain of SLE patients presents nonfocal atrophy and cortical and subcortical functional alterations of unknown origin (10).

Several autoantibodies have been associated with NP-SLE. These include autoantibodies against antiribosomal-P proteins (anti-Ps) (11), neurofilaments (12), microtubule-associated protein 2 (13), N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) (14, 15), endothelial cells (16), and neuronal cells (17) (for reviews see references 3, 8). However, excluding anti-NMDAR antibodies, all of the other associations lack mechanistic explanations. Immunocomplex-mediated small vessel inflammation, which typically leads to tissue injury in the kidney and other organs, seems not to be important in the psychiatric manifestations (8). Evidence from other autoimmune diseases indicates that certain autoantibodies can directly cause damage to neuronal physiology by interfering with the function of cell-surface elements such as receptors and ion channels (18). In SLE, this possibility has been suggested by the finding of a subset of anti–double-stranded DNA autoantibodies that cross react with NMDAR and induce neurotoxicity and cognitive alterations (19–22). It thus seems likely that other autoantibodies, as yet unknown, could also display neuropathogenic properties by interacting with a suitable neuronal surface target to contribute to NP lupus.

Anti-P autoantibodies (23, 24) have been viewed for a long time as the most reiterative but also controversial candidates for a neuropathogenic role in SLE (5, 8, 25, 26). These antibodies are quite specific for SLE, but their reported prevalence varies widely from 6–45%, seemingly depending on differences in methodology and ethnic backgrounds (5, 26). There is also evidence that healthy individuals express anti-P antibodies masked by antiidiotypic antibodies, suggesting that anti-P antibodies could become detectable in SLE patients because of a loss of this regulatory network (27, 28). In 1987, Bonfa et al. made the seminal observation that anti-P autoantibodies associate with lupus psychosis (29). Afterward, anti-P has also been associated with lupus hepatitis and nephritis (30), but its pathogenic role remains controversial. Several studies have confirmed the clinical association between anti-P antibodies and psychiatric lupus, occasionally extending it to severe depression and other CNS-diffuse manifestations (8, 25, 31–33). The serum titer of anti-P has been reported to follow the psychiatric manifestations (29). Anti-P antibodies have also been detected in the cerebro spinal fluid of NP-SLE patients (34, 35). Furthermore, a recent study reported that injection of anti-P antibodies into the mice brain provokes a depression-like behavior (36). All of these data constitute strong evidence for a pathogenic role of anti-P antibodies (30, 37). However, several contradicting reports failed to find any association with NP-SLE (5, 26, 38), thus creating a controversy. Methodological and clinical considerations could explain certain discrepancies but are in fact insufficient to dissipate the doubts raised on the actual role of anti-P antibodies in NP-SLE (2, 5, 25, 37). Contributing to this uncertainty is the lack of explanatory mechanisms able to causally relate anti-P antibodies with CNS dysfunction (25). Actually, molecular, cellular, and physiological bases for the postulated anti-P neuropathogenicity remain unknown, and the direct effects of these antibodies on neurons have not been reported.

Anti-P autoantibodies recognize a C-terminal epitope of 22 amino acids shared by three highly conserved phosphoproteins called P proteins−P0 (38 kD), P1 (19 kD), and P2 (17 kD)—of the large ribosomal subunit (23, 24). Further refinement has restricted the P epitope location to the last 11 C-terminal residues (39). Being intracellular, these ribosomal antigens are normally inaccessible to circulating antibodies. However, a crucial advance toward understanding the pathogenic role of anti-P antibodies has been the observation that they bind to the surface of several kinds of cells, including human neuroblastoma and hepatoma cells (40). The cell-surface target for anti-P antibodies is currently believed to be a 38-kD protein, which is assumed to correspond to a cell-surface form of the P0 ribosomal protein (37). Subsequent studies led to the notion that anti-P antibodies might somehow penetrate into living cells and provoke deleterious effects (41). In this scenario, anti-P antibodies would have a generalized deleterious potential to cause dysfunctions in a variety of different cells (30, 37).

In this paper, we provide a novel mechanistic framework that is more specifically applicable to a neuropathogenic role for the anti-P antibodies. We demonstrate that a new nonribosomal protein present at the cell surface of certain neuronal populations is recognized by anti-P autoantibodies, with consequences for neuronal calcium homeostasis and survival.

RESULTS

A high molecular mass cell-surface protein (p331) exposes an extracellular P epitope

In a previous paper, we found anti-P antibodies in 15% of our cohort of 141 SLE patients, including 2 with psychosis (33). From these two patients with psychosis, we isolated specific anti-P antibodies by affinity chromatography using a synthetic P peptide of 11 residues (P₁₁) (39). Unless otherwise specified, all of the experiments were performed indistinctly with either one of these sera, as both produced similar results. In the immunoblot, these affinity-purified human anti-P against P₁₁ (α-hP₁₁) antibodies showed reactivity with the three ribosomal P proteins: P0 (38 kD), P1 (19 kD), and P2 (17 kD; Fig. 1 A), which was blocked by competition with the synthetic P₁₁ peptide, thus indicating specificity. With these affinity-purified antibodies, we analyzed neurons in primary culture and neuroblastoma N2a cells, searching for cell-surface anti-P immunoreactivity and molecular targets. Two complementary approaches, biotinylation assays and direct cell-surface protein immunocapture and precipitation, which we had used in previous studies to detect proteins at the cell surface (42–44), unexpectedly revealed not the described 38-kD protein (37) but a very high molecular mass protein (>200 kD) that exposes a cell-surface P epitope (Figs. 1 and Figs.2). We provisionally named this protein p331 based on its sequence data (see next section).

Figure 1.

Affinity-purified anti-P antibodies recognize a cell-surface protein of high molecular mass (p331) in neurons. (A) Immunoblot (IB) with affinity-purified anti-P antibodies (α-hP₁₁) shows reaction with the P ribosomal proteins P0 (38 kD), P1 (19 (more ...)

Figure 2.

Antibodies against ribosomal P epitope recognize p331 in the surface of N2a cells. (A) Anti-P indirect immunofluorescence in intact neuroblastoma N2a cells. The cell-surface staining, superimposed over images of Nomarski interference microscopy, is asymmetrically (more ...)

Indirect immunofluorescence showed anti-P reactivity in rat brain cortex cells in primary culture. To avoid permeabilization during fixation, we initially incubated intact cells with the antibodies at 4°C and, after washing and fixing them, added the secondary antibody. Only certain neurons displayed strong fluorescence staining (Fig. 1 B), suggesting that a subset of cortex neurons express a cell-surface P antigen, at least at immunofluorescence-detectable levels. To identify the anti-P molecular target, we had to increase the sensitivity of the biotinylation assays by using metabolically labeled cells and phosphoroimaging detection (45). This strategy disclosed a single protein of high molecular mass (p331) in the neuronal surface (Fig. 1 C).

Rat neuroblastoma N2a cells gave coincident results, providing a more homogeneous cellular system that facilitated further analysis. These cells displayed strong and asymmetrically localized anti-P cell-surface staining (Fig. 2 A). Regular biotinylation assays indicated that most of this cell-surface immunoreactivity is attributable to the high molecular mass p331 antigen. After biotinylation of the cell surface, we initially immunoprecipitated with anti-P antibodies and then assessed the biotinylated proteins in the immunocomplexes by blotting with streptavidin conjugates (42, 43, 45). This stepwise order of the experiment ensured that the detected proteins are indeed biotinylated and, therefore, exposed at the cell surface. Only the p331 showed up in the cell surface of N2a cells (Fig. 2 B). The blocking effect of the P₁₁ peptide indicated that p331 contains a P epitope (Fig. 2, A and B).

This unexpected p331 anti-P cell-surface target was further confirmed by direct immunocapture from metabolically labeled cells. N2a cells were initially metabolically labeled and then incubated intact with α-hP₁₁ antibodies at 4°C. The immunocomplexes formed at the cell surface were isolated by protein A–sepharose precipitation, as previously described (42, 43). This approach also revealed p331 as the main, if not the only, protein exposing a P epitope at the cell surface (Fig. 2 C). Similar experiments made with whole serum instead of affinity-purified α-hP₁₁ antibodies also demonstrated p331 as the cell-surface anti-P target (Fig. 2 D). Anti-P (−) sera showed no reaction with this p331 protein, whereas anti-P (+) sera from five different lupus patients, including one patient with lupus psychosis (lane 5) and four patients without NP symptoms (lanes 6–9), immunoprecipitated only the p331 from the cell surface (Fig. 2 D). All of these results disclosed a new P antigen–bearing protein accessible to anti-P autoantibodies from the extracellular medium, expressed by at least certain neurons in the brain (as shown in Fig. 1).

p331 is a novel integral membrane protein of unknown function expressed in brain neurons termed neuronal surface P antigens (NSPAs)

Rat brain synaptosomal fractions highly enriched in synaptic regions (46) provided additional evidence of the presence of p331 in brain neurons. Only P (+) sera, either from a patient with lupus psychosis or from patients without NP-SLE, recognized the p331 protein in synaptosomes (Fig. 3 A). Given the variety of autoantibodies produced by lupus patients, some sera also showed other immunoblot bands. However, when using affinity-purified α-hP₁₁ antibodies instead of serum, p331 appeared as the main detectable anti-P target at the synaptic region (synaptosomes; Fig. 2 B, lane 1).

Figure 3.

The anti-P target p331 is an integral membrane protein present in rat brain synaptosomes. (A) Detection of p331 in rat brain synaptosomes. Membrane fractions prepared from rat brain synaptosomes were analyzed by immunoblot (IB) with control sera from (more ...)

Synaptosomes provided abundant material for distinguishing between extrinsic and intrinsic membrane proteins by using the standard method of sodium carbonate extraction (47), as well as for preparative immunoprecipitations. Resistance to alkaline extraction (e.g., recovery of the protein in the pellet of extracted membranes) indicated that p331 is an integral membrane protein (Fig. 3 B, lanes 2 and 3). Preparative immunoprecipitations from synaptosomal fractions (P2 fraction) (46) yielded enough p331 to perform mass spectrometric analysis and microsequencing (Fig. 4 A). The major accompanying protein of 180 kD corresponded to the clathrin heavy chain. It might be that p331 interacts with clathrin, which is a cytosolic protein and certainly not an anti-P target. In contrast, p331 turned out to be a novel protein. Six internal peptides (P1–6) were microsequenced and found to align with the sequence of the human protein NP055928 (Fig. 4 B), which is of unknown function. This protein is encoded by the complementary DNA NM015113 originally reported in a high molecular weight complementary DNA library of the human brain (48). Its unique gene, located in chromosome 17, lacks any homologues in the entire human genome and encodes a protein of 2,961 residues (with an estimated molecular mass of 331 kD), which contains a calcium-binding domain, an anaphase-promoting complex 10 domain, a CUB domain, and two zinc-binding domains. It possesses 8–11 hydrophobic regions, each encompassing 19–23 residues, but its large size did not allow us to predict which of them correspond to membrane-spanning domains. Because it lacks an N-terminal signal peptide, its membrane insertion is most likely directed by an internal signal peptide that is also a transmembrane domain, similar to type II and to several polytopic proteins, but the actual signal peptide remains unpredictable by the available algorithms. Predicting transmembrane domains and discriminating them from signal peptides that currently look the same has inherent difficulties, which can only be circumvented by experimental data (49, 50). The sequence of NP055928 is available from GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ under accession no. NP_055928. Because our results indicated that p331 (NP055928) exposes a P epitope to the cell surface, we termed this protein NSPA.

Figure 4.

p331 is a novel protein named NSPA. (A) Preparative immunoprecipitation of neuronal anti-P target. Presynaptosomal fractions (P2) obtained from 50 rat brains were subjected to immunoprecipitation with affinity-purified anti-P antibodies. SDS-PAGE and (more ...)

Possible P epitopes displayed by NSPA at the cell surface

Optimal binding of anti-P antibodies to the last 11 C-terminal residues of P ribosomal proteins (SE/DDDMGFGLFD) depends on clusters of acidic (E/DDD) and hydrophobic (GFGLFD) residues, which very likely correspond to two overlapping epitopes (51, 52). The phosphorylated amino acids of the P proteins are not critical epitope determinants (51). Analysis of peptide arrays has suggested that the GFGLFD motif is the key determinant recognized by anti-P antibodies (52). In NSPA, a region encompassing residues ₂₈₈₁GLFE₂₈₈₄ partially coincides with this P ribosomal epitope (Fig. 4 B), which accepts the conservative D/E substitution (53). Other studies modeled the paratope–epitope interaction on a monoclonal antibody and suggested that the DDxGF sequence, present in all members of the P protein family (i.e., P0, P1, and P2), conforms to a P epitope in which any residue can occupy the x position (54). In NSPA, a motif like this is represented by the sequence ₆₄₄DDLG₆₄₇ (Fig. 4 B). To assess whether these two motifs, in the context of NSPA, could mediate interactions with anti-P antibodies, we tested the blocking capability of synthetic peptides encompassing these regions (Fig. 5 A). NSPA synthetic peptides ₆₄₂SSDDLGED₆₄₉ and ₂₈₇₆THMEYGLFEDV₂₈₈₆ (underlined residues could conform a P epitope) dramatically decreased the characteristic asymmetrical cell-surface staining of α-hP₁₁ antibodies, whereas the scrambled peptides containing the same residues in random positions had minor effects (Fig. 5 A). Because the peptide-array analysis of Mahler et al. (52) did not attribute a major role to the acidic cluster in the anti-P antibody recognition, contrasting with the findings of Hasler et al. (51), we tested more directly whether the NSPA peptide ₆₄₂SSDDLGED₆₄₉ could effectively interact with anti-P antibodies. Affinity chromatography with this peptide isolated a subset of anti-P antibodies (α-hP₄) from P (+) sera. These α-hP₄ antibodies mimicked the previously characterized α-hP₁₁ antibodies, recognizing the P ribosomal proteins from rat liver (Fig. 5 B) and the p331 in carbonate-extracted synaptosomal membranes (Fig. 5 C), and displaying the regionalized immunofluorescent pattern at the surface of N2a cells, which was completely abrogated by the ₆₄₂SSDDLGED₆₄₉ peptide (Fig. 5 D). Therefore, our results indicate that NSPA exposes two regions to the cell surface encompassing the residues ₆₄₄DDLG₆₄₇ and ₂₈₈₁GLFE₂₈₈₄, which are recognized by anti-P antibodies, most likely within the context of a conformational epitope given their mutually distant locations.

Figure 5.

Two distant regions of NSPA containing ₆₄₄DDLG₆₄₇ and ₂₈₈₁GLFD₂₈₈₄ sequences participate in the cell-surface interaction with anti-P autoantibodies. (A) Blocking activity of synthetic peptides against the cell-surface staining of α-hP₁₁ antibodies (more ...)

In the brain, NSPA is exclusively expressed by neurons at specific zones

The finding of NSPA prompted us to produce rabbit antibodies suitable for immunohistochemistry and determine which brain cells and regions might be targets for anti-P autoantibodies. Anti-P antibodies are not convenient tools for this purpose because of their interaction with ubiquitous ribosomal proteins. We tried different peptides of NSPA as immunogens. Interestingly, a polyclonal antibody raised against an NSPA peptide containing the ₂₈₈₁GLFE₂₈₈₄ motif (THMEYGLFEDV; Fig. 4 B) did not recognize any of the P ribosomal proteins (not depicted), whereas it did interact with NSPA (Fig. 6). Thus, anti-P autoantibodies seem to differ from the antibodies produced by immunization, at least in the recognition of the GLFE sequence. However, these α-NSPA antibodies recognized the integral membrane protein p331 in alkaline-extracted synaptosomal membranes (Fig. 6 A), and showed cross reaction (Fig. 6 B) and cell-surface colocalization with α-hP₁₁ antibodies (Fig. 6 C), indicating that they interact with the same protein recognized by α-hP₁₁ antibodies.

Figure 6.

Polyclonal antibodies against NSPA. (A) Immunoblots (IB) with human α-hP₁₁ autoantibodies and rabbit anti-NSPA (α-NSPA) antibodies of carbonate-extracted synaptosomal membranes. Both antibodies recognize the high molecular mass protein (more ...)

Strikingly, immunohistochemistry of the rat brain showed that α-NSPA antibody stained only neurons and only at specific brain zones (Fig. 7). In the neocortex, α-NSPA stained neurons of layers I, II, III, and V with somatodendritic distribution. Layer IV lacks staining. In the hippocampus, α-NSPA staining predominates in somatodendritic regions of interneurons (Fig. 7 A, arrows). Neurons of the bed nucleus of stria terminalis show NSPA in a pattern characteristic of synaptic buttons. In the central nucleus of the amygdala, NSPA also appeared concentrated in synaptic regions, including calyx-like terminals (Fig. 7 A, arrows), very much like the CGRP-immunoreactive calices that originate from the lateral parabrachial nucleus (55). The brain regions displaying α-NSPA immunostaining (Fig. 7 C) included regions preferentially involved in higher brain functions such as cognition, emotion, and memory. The specificity of the immunostaining was shown by its complete abrogation with the immunogenic peptide (Fig. 7 B) and by its correlation with NSPA expression (e.g., the lack of staining in the stratium and the lack of immunoblot detection of NSPA in synaptosomes isolated from this region; Fig. 7 C). In synaptosomes isolated from brain cortex, we detected NSPA by using not only α-NSPA or α-hP₁₁ antibodies (Fig. 7 C) but also rabbit antibodies raised against a peptide of 11 residues of the C-terminal region of the ribosomal p38 (not depicted). The results summarized in Fig. 7 C indicate that NSPA is expressed by neurons of certain regions of the brain, which might well be involved in NP-SLE.

Figure 7.

NSPA is expressed by neurons at specific regions of the brain. (A) Immunohistochemistry of NSPA in the rat brain. Some brain regions with framed zones of higher magnification (insets) are illustrated. Arrows indicate interneurons, synaptic buttons, and (more ...)

Both anti-P and anti-NSPA antibodies elicit calcium entry into cortical neurons in primary culture

Having shown that anti-P antibodies interact with a protein located at the neuronal surface, we went on to study their possible impact on neuronal function. Initially, we monitored cytosolic calcium in rat cortical cultures loaded with fluorescent calcium indicators. Calibration experiments showed that resting calcium levels in these cultures fluctuate at ~50 nM for astrocytes and 80 nM for neurons. Exposure to anti-P antibodies caused a rapid and sustained increase in cytosolic calcium in neurons (Fig. 8 A). The effect, which was readily reversible upon removal of the antibody, was blocked by the synthetic P peptide (Fig. 8 B), showed dependency on antibody concentration (Fig. 8 C), and reflected a calcium influx from the extracellular medium, as judged by inhibition with EGTA (Fig. 8 D). Affinity-purified anti-P antibodies from three different lupus patients that developed psychosis gave similar results, whereas the IgG fraction from the serum of normal individuals showed no effect (unpublished data). Strikingly, our anti-NSPA antibodies mimicked the effects of the anti-P antibodies, though in a lesser magnitude at a similar concentration (Fig. 8 E). Rabbit affinity-purified control antibodies against proteins unrelated to ribosomal P proteins caused no effect (unpublished data).

Figure 8.

Anti-P and anti-NSPA antibodies induce calcium influx in cortical primary neurons. Graphs illustrate cells displaying different degrees of responsiveness. (A) α-hP₁₁ antibodies induce a sustained increase in calcium levels. The cells were incubated (more ...)

Anti-P acted selectively on neurons. Astrocytes, in which we could not detect NSPA by immunohistochemistry, responded very weakly or not at all, neither to human anti-P nor to rabbit anti-NSPA antibodies (Fig. 8 F). These results demonstrate that anti-P antibodies can effectively interfere with neuronal function through specific interaction with an extracellularly exposed P epitope. Because NSPA was the only anti-P target that we could detect in neurons and the antibodies against it also triggered calcium influx, it seems very likely that NSPA mediates the effects of anti-P antibodies.

Anti-P antibodies induce apoptosis and loss of neurons both in vitro and in vivo

In neurons, moderate but sustained Ca^{2 +} overloads are known to cause cell death (56). Consistently, brain cultures exposed to anti-P antibodies developed several signs of neuronal stress, including morphological changes, dramatic decrease of neuronal processes, nuclear alterations, and activation of the apoptotic marker caspase-3 (Fig. 9 A). Cell viability decreased, resulting in a loss of cells from the culture (Fig. 9 B).

Figure 9.

α-hP₁₁ autoantibodies induce neuronal apoptosis in vitro and in vivo. (A) α-hP₁₁ antibodies induce apoptosis in neurons in primary culture. Cells were incubated with 100 μg/ml of control IgG or 0.5 μg/ml of α-hP (more ...)

Definitive proof of a neuropathogenic role of anti-P antibodies requires demonstration of their neurotoxicity in the brain. To this end, we performed in vivo experiments. Injection of anti-P antibodies into the primary motor cortex of living rats resulted in neuronal apoptosis, as revealed by caspase-3 activation, and loss of neurons (Fig. 9 C). Similar results were observed in four rats and with α-hP₁₁ antibodies from two different SLE patients, including one with psychosis. Therefore, anti-P antibodies do have a strong neurotoxic potential to lead to CNS compromise.

Anti-P antibodies isolated from patients without NP-SLE also induce calcium influx and neuronal apoptosis

In all previous functional experiments, we used anti-P antibodies affinity purified from two SLE patients that presented psychosis at the moment of obtaining the serum samples. However, our results showed that anti-P (+) serum from patients that manifested no NP symptoms also recognized NSPA (Figs. 2 and Figs.3). Thus, it seems crucial to determine whether the anti-P antibodies produced by these two groups of patients display relevant functional differences to account for developing or not developing NP-SLE. Strikingly, anti-P antibodies affinity purified from two SLE patients that had never presented NP symptoms elicited sustained calcium influx and apoptosis (Fig. S1, available at http://www.jem.org/cgi/content/full/jem.20071285/DC1), thus revealing a pathogenic equivalence to the anti-P antibodies produced by SLE patients with psychosis.

DISCUSSION

We found a new target for anti-P autoantibody, termed NSPA, that is expressed at the surface of brain neurons and can potentially mediate anti-P–dependent NP symptoms. Sequence data and biochemical characterization showed that NSPA corresponds to a new integral membrane protein of high molecular mass (331 kD). A polyclonal antibody suitable for immunohistochemistry demonstrated that NSPA is expressed by neurons from specific regions of the brain, including regions involved in emotional responses, memory, and other higher brain functions that become affected in neuropshychiatric lupus. In addition, we disclosed for the first time that anti-P autoantibodies have neurotoxic potential, as shown on neurons in culture and in situ. Thus, our results contribute to mechanistic support for the role of anti-P autoantibodies in NP-SLE that has been studied for more than 20 years.

More than 100 autoantibodies have been described in SLE, but very few can be associated with clinical outcomes and even fewer revealed their pathogenic mechanism (1, 8). Particularly elusive has been the role of autoantibodies in the pathogenesis of NP-SLE (2, 6). The subset of anti–double-stranded DNA reported to cross react with NMDAR, resulting in apoptotic neuronal loss and cognitive impairment in mice, so far constitute the best documented factor with neuropathogenic potential to mediate CNS dysfunctions (19–22). However, the clinical evidence still seems limited (57). Two series coincidently reported their association with depression but differed in their association with cognitive decline in lupus patients (14, 15). In contrast, anti-P antibodies had remained for a long time as the most promising candidates for a neuropathogenic role in SLE, supported by numerous clinical data that reported their association with lupus psychosis and/or depression (25, 34, 35). However, contradictory studies (5, 26, 38), combined with the lack of any suitable neuronal target or evidence of deleterious actions on neuronal function, have consistently raised doubts about the pathogenic role of anti-P antibodies (25, 37).

The following evidence indicates that NSPA is a neuronal target of anti-P antibodies able to mediate neurotoxic effects. First, affinity-purified anti-P antibodies used in biotinylation and immunocapture assays detected NSPA as the only cell-surface target, both in N2a cells and in cortex neurons in primary culture. Experiments of alkaline extraction of synaptosomal membranes also showed NSPA as the only protein recognized by anti-P antibodies. Second, peptide competition blocked the interaction of anti-P antibodies with the cell surface, indicating that NSPA exposes a P epitope at the cell surface, very likely conformed by two separate regions encompassing residues ₆₄₄DDLG₆₄₇ and ₂₈₈₁GLFE₂₈₈₄. Third, affinity-purified anti-P antibodies from two SLE patients with psychosis and rabbit anti-NSPA antibodies both triggered calcium influx into neurons in primary culture showing specific target dependency, as demonstrated by the corresponding blocking peptide. Neither anti-P nor anti-NSPA antibodies elicited calcium influx in astrocytes that do not express NSPA. Fourth, anti-P antibodies elicited caspase-3 activation and neuronal death both in vitro and in the rat brain in vivo. Finally, experiments with rabbit anti-P antibodies raised against the 11 ribosomal C-terminal residues containing the P epitopes mimicked the reactivity and the effects of both α-hP11 and α-NSPA antibodies, including the recognition of cell surface and synaptosomal NSPA, and the induction of calcium influx and apoptosis in neurons (unpublished data). Collectively, these results indicate that anti-P antibodies interact with NSPA through a P epitope exposed at the cell surface, and as a consequence of such interaction, neurons experience enhanced calcium entry and undergo apoptosis.

Our anti-NSPA antibodies allowed us to define the distribution of a cell-surface protein bearing a P epitope in the brain. In immunohistochemistry, we found NSPA being expressed by neurons at specific brain regions, including neocortical layers II, V, and VI, and other zones of relevance for the pathogenesis of NP-SLE, such as the amygdala, which is involved in arousal and emotional responses (58), the cortex and hippocampus, which are involved in memory and higher brain functions (59), and the ventral tegmental area, which is associated with reward processing and drug addiction (60). A recent study reported that anti-P antibodies selectively stained certain limbic regions of the mice brain (36), but it did not clarify whether the immunostaining involved neuronal or glial cell bodies, or axons, and did not identify the antigen recognized by anti-P antibodies. Anti-P antibodies might decorate ribosomes in cells that could become inadvertently permeabilized during the immunohistochemistry. Instead, our α-NSPA antibody only showed immunohistochemical staining in neurons (neural bodies), and in some places we could distinguish immunostaining in axon terminals (synaptic buttons), including the calyx-like axon terminal in the central nucleus of the amygdala. Controls indicating that the immunohistochemical staining corresponds specifically to NSPA included competition with the immunogenic NSPA peptide and correlation with immunoblot detection in synaptosomes obtained from either the cortex or striatum, which displayed or lacked α-NSPA staining, respectively. Thus, our present work not only identifies a new P antigen that is expressed at the neuronal cell surface but also discloses in great detail its distribution in the brain. At least through interaction with NSPA, anti-P antibodies could provoke serious dysfunctions in the CNS and contribute to developing NP disorders.

Because not all SLE patients that produce anti-P antibodies develop an NP disease, an important yet unsolved question is whether anti-P antibodies from SLE patients that do not manifest psychiatric or other diffuse CNS symptoms are functionally equivalent to those produced by SLE patients with psychiatric compromise. We showed that anti-P antibodies from SLE patients without NP disease not only recognize NSPA but also induce calcium influx and apoptosis in neurons, indicating that they possess an equivalent pathogenic potential as psychiatrically associated anti-P antibodies. Therefore, besides the production of anti-P antibodies, additional risk factors are certainly required for eliciting psychiatric manifestations.

Both accessibility into the brain and the presence of other autoantibodies very likely cooperate in developing NP-SLE. Experiments in mice that produce or have been injected with antibodies against NMDAR recently highlighted the requirement of disrupting the blood–brain barrier (BBB) for autoantibody-mediated brain symptoms, which varied according to the region of the BBB breach (21, 22). Evidence of antibody production in situ in the brain and passage across the BBB have been described in SLE patients (22, 61). There are also several conditions that promote BBB breach, including infection, stress, hypertension, and nicotine exposure (21, 22, 62), which can vary among patients. In addition, the variety of NP symptoms in SLE patients very likely involves coexpression of autoantibodies with direct or indirect neuropathogenic potential, such as anti-NMDAR antibodies (19). In this paper, we show that anti-NSPA antibodies share with α-hp₁₁ antibodies the capacity to trigger neuronal calcium influx. Future studies should determine whether SLE patients produce autoantibodies against NSPA, which might be distinct from anti-P antibodies. All of these factors could contribute to the NP outcome of SLE.

The identification of new neuronal surface molecules as autoimmune targets in the CNS also entails general interest. Disorders affecting the neuromuscular junction involve autoantibodies against nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in myasthenia gravis, calcium channels in the Lambert-Eaton syndrome, and potassium channels in Isaac's syndrome (18, 63). Whether autoantibodies underlie certain CNS disorders remains less apparent, as they would require a mechanism to access CNS targets (22). Autoantibody targets with pathogenic potential include the glutamate receptor 3 in Rasmussen's encephalitis (64), metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 in paraneoplastic cerebellar ataxia (65), the NMDAR in SLE (19), and neuropeptides in eating disorders (66). The protein that we described in this study, NSPA, is a candidate for alterations caused either by autoantibodies or mutations that may eventually promote psychiatric disease, not only in SLE. Although the function of NSPA is unknown, we can speculate, by analogy with the mentioned disorders, that it may be related to cell-surface receptors and/or ion channels.

In summary, we have contributed a mechanistic link to the vast body of clinical evidence supporting a role of anti-P antibodies in psychiatric lupus that can explain why they might be pathogenic. Deleterious calcium influxes can be triggered by anti-P antibodies in brain neuronal cells through interaction with NSPA at specific brain zones.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell culture and viability assay

Neuroblastoma N2a cells were grown in DMEM with 7.5% FBS and antibiotics (200 U/ml penicillin, 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin). Primary cultures of cortical neurons were prepared from rat embryos (E18), as previously described (67), and were maintained for at least 7 d before the experiments, either without or with 4 μm of cytosine arabinoside (Sigma-Aldrich) added 48 h after plating to prevent nonneuronal cell proliferation (68). Cell viability assays were performed by 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium (MTT; Sigma-Aldrich) reduction, as previously described (69), except that the lysis buffer lacks formamide. All of the experiments were performed in triplicate.

Antibodies and affinity chromatography

Anti-P–positive sera from patients with SLE controlled at our Rheumatology Department of the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile were screened by ELISA (33) and further characterized by immunoblotting with alkaline-phosphatase (42) against rat liver ribosomes (23). Specific α-hP₁₁ anti-P antibodies were isolated by affinity chromatography (70) using the peptide SDEDMGFGLFD from C-terminal ribosomal P0. Antibodies against NSPA were raised by immunizing rabbits with peptide K-₂₈₇₆THMEYGLFEDV₂₈₈₆ of the human sequence NP055928, coupled to mollusk Concholepas concholepas hemocyanin (Blue Carrier; Biosonda Biotechnology), and were also affinity purified. Polyclonal antibodies were against D2R (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) or against clathrin (donated by T. Kirchhausen, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA).

Detection of P epitope–bearing proteins at the cell surface

Cell-surface biotinylation assays.

Cell-surface biotinylation was performed with Sulfo-NHS-biotin (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to a previously established procedure (42, 43, 45). The cells were lysed in buffer A (50 mM Hepes, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EGTA, 2 mM MgCl₂, 10% glycerol, and 1% Triton X-100, supplemented with a cocktail of protease inhibitors including 50 μg/ml pepstatin A and 1 mM PMSF) for 30 min at 4°C, and immunoprecipitation was performed with 10 μg of affinity-purified anti-P antibody prebound to protein A–sepharose, either with or without 50 μg of competing P peptide. After resolving the immunocomplexes by 7.5% SDS-PAGE, biotinylated proteins were detected with horseradish peroxidase–streptavidin (42). For brain cortical primary cultures, the biotinylation assay was performed in metabolically labeled cells for 16 h with 100 μCi [³⁵S]methionine-cysteine. The immunocomplexes were resuspended in 10% SDS and heated to 100°C for 5 min, and after pelleting the beads, the supernatant was collected and incubated with immobilized neutravidin protein for 18 h at 4°C, thus separating by precipitation the cell-surface biotinylated proteins. Samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and revealed by phosphorimager scanning (Cyclone Storage Phosphor Scanner; PerkinElmer).

Immunocapture of cell-surface P epitope–bearing proteins.

N2a cells grown to confluence in 3.5-cm well dishes were metabolically labeled with 100 μCi [³⁵S]methionine-cysteine for 18 h and incubated intact for 1 h at 4°C with 30 μl of either P-positive serum, to capture P epitope–bearing cell-surface proteins. After exhaustively washing out the unbound antibodies, the cells were lysed in buffer A, protein A–sepharose was added, and the immunocomplexes were sedimented by centrifugation, resolved by 7.5% SDS-PAGE, and revealed by fluorography (42, 43). To detect the high molecular mass anti-P target (p331), it is crucial to use fresh antiproteases, run the dye front out of the gel, and continue the electrophoretic migration for 90 min extra.

Detection of P epitope–bearing proteins in synaptosomes

Synaptosomes were isolated from the rat brain with the Percoll gradient method (46) and lysed in buffer A. Immunoblots were performed with a 1:1,000 dilution of anti-P (+) sera and revealed with electrochemiluminescence (ECL). Immune cross reaction of NSPA was assessed by immunoprecipitation with 10 μg of affinity-purified anti-P antibody prebound to 30 μl of protein A–sepharose (Sigma-Aldrich) and immunoblotting with either preimmune serum or affinity-purified anti-NSPA antibody, followed by peroxidase-labeled anti–rabbit (Rockland) and ECL. Sodium carbonate extraction was performed exactly as previously described (47).

Immunofluorescence microscopy

N2a cells grown in 10-mm coverglasses (VWR Scientific) were fixed and treated for indirect immunofluorescence either in intact cells or in cells permeabilized by 0.2% Triton X-100, as previously described (42, 70). Digital images of fluorescence and Nomarski interference were acquired on a microscope (Axiophot; Carl Zeiss, Inc.) with a 63× immersion objective and a 14-bit camera (Axiocam), and were transferred to a computer workstation running imaging software (Axiovision) (70).

Preparative immunoisolation of P epitope–bearing proteins and internal peptide sequence analysis

A presynaptosomal membrane fraction (P2) prepared from the brains of 50 rats was solubilized with lysis buffer A and used for immunoprecipitation of P-bearing proteins by adding 400 μg of affinity-purified anti-P antibody previously bound to 100 mg of protein A–sepharose for 2 h at 4°C. The immunocomplexes were exhaustively washed for 24 h at 4°C, resolved in preparative 7.5% SDS-PAGE, and stained with Coomassie blue. Relevant bands were isolated and treated for matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry (TofSpec 2E; Micromass) and analysis (Protein Prospector, available at http://www.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/prospect.htm). The most abundant mass peaks were subjected to electrospray ionization for mass spectrometric sequencing (ESI-MS/MS; QT [Micromass]). In addition, peptide sequences were obtained by Edman's degradation at the Max-Delbrück-Center.

Rat brain immunohistochemistry

Male Sprague-Dawley rats were deeply anaesthetized, and the brains were fixed and processed for immunohistochemistry exactly as previously described (71), using 12 μg/ml of the affinity-purified anti-NSPA antibody or 1:500 dilution of anticleaved caspase-3 antibody (Cell Signaling Technology). The sections were incubated with the secondary antibody (1:1,000 dilution) of Biotin-SP–conjugated AffiniPure goat anti–rabbit IgG (H+L; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories). Preadsorption of the anti-P antisera with the peptide K-₂₈₇₆THMEYGLFEDV₂₈₈₆ was used to control specificity.

Surgery and stereotaxis

Animal handling and care were performed according to the recommendations of the National Institutes of Health Guide for Animal Experimentation Care. The Commission on Bioethics and Biosafety of the Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas at the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile approved the study protocols. Adult Male Sprague-Dawley rats were anesthetized with 0.01%/100 g ketamine, placed in a stereotaxic frame, and bilaterally injected in the primary motor cortex with 0.7 μg of affinity-purified human anti-P antibody in 1 μl of sterile PBS, according to coordinates measured from bregma (72): anteroposterior, 1 mm; lateral, 2 mm; and horizontal, 1 mm from the skull. The rats (n = 4) were killed 24 h after lesion. As a control, rats were bilaterally injected with 0.7 μg of human IgG antibody purified by adsorption to protein A–sepharose.

Intracellular calcium levels

Confocal microscopy was used to assess intracellular calcium in cortical neurons (400,000 cells plated on coverslips) loaded for 30 min with 5 μM Fluo-3 AM and Fura Red AM (Invitrogen), as previously described (67). Real-time fluorophore emissions were registered at room temperature (23–26°C) in an inverted laser-scanning confocal microscope (LSM5 PASCAL; Carl Zeiss, Inc.) with a 40× objective (numerical aperture, 1.3). Cultures were excited at 488 nm every 15–30s, or every 2 min in Fig. 8 A, and Fluo-3 AM and Fura Red AM were imaged simultaneously. A ratio (R) minus background (ΔR) was calculated between the green (Fluo-3 AM) and red (Fura Red AM) emissions, which is proportional to the concentration of cytosolic calcium. Data are presented as ΔR/Ro, where Ro is the ratio at the beginning of each experiment.

Online supplemental material

Fig. S1 depicts the results obtained with anti-P antibodies affinity purified from SLE patients without NP symptoms. Online supplemental material is available at http://www.jem.org/cgi/content/full/jem.20071285/DC1.

Supplemental Material

[Supplemental Material Index]

Click here to view.

[Related biobytes podcast]

Click here to view.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Jorge Garrido for his useful comments and suggestions to improve this manuscript. This work was approved by the Investigational Ethical Review Board of the Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.

This work received financial support from FONDAP (grant 13980001), Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico (doctoral grant 2990025 to P.V. Burgos), a doctoral fellowship from the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (to S. Matus and P.V. Burgos), and the Millennium Institute for Fundamental and Applied Biology, financed in part by the Ministerio de Planificación y Cooperación de Chile.

The authors have no conflicting financial interests.

Notes

Abbreviations used: α-hP₁₁ and α-hP₄, affinity-purified human anti-P against a synthetic P peptide of 11 or 4 residues, respectively; anti-P, antiribosomal-P protein; BBB, blood–brain barrier; CNS, central nervous system; NMDAR,N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor; NP, neuropsychiatric; NSPA, neuronal surface P antigen; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus.

S. Matus and P.V. Burgos contributed equally to this study.

P.V. Burgos's present address is Cell Biology and Metabolism Branch, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.

References

1. Sherer, Y., A. Gorstein, M.J. Fritzler, and Y. Shoenfeld. 2004. Autoantibody explosion in systemic lupus erythematosus: more than 100 different antibodies found in SLE patients. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 34:501–537. [PubMed]

2. West, S.G. 2007. The nervous system. In Dubois' Lupus Erythematosus. Seventh edition. D.J. Wallace and B.H. Hahn, editors. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia. 707–746.

3. Hanly, J.G., A. Kuznetsova, and J.D. Fisk. 2007. Psychopathology of lupus and neuroimaging. In Dubois' Lupus Erythematosus. Seventh edition. D.J. Wallace and B.H. Hahn, editors. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia. 747–774.

4. Hanly, J.G., M.B. Urowitz, J. Sanchez-Guerrero, S.C. Bae, C. Gordon, D.J. Wallace, D. Isenberg, G.S. Alarcon, A. Clarke, S. Bernatsky, et al. 2007. Neuropsychiatric events at the time of diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus: an international inception cohort study. Arthritis Rheum. 56:265–273. [PubMed]

5. Karassa, F.B., A. Afeltra, A. Ambrozic, D.M. Chang, F. De Keyser, A. Doria, M. Galeazzi, S. Hirohata, I.E. Hoffman, M. Inanc, et al. 2006. Accuracy of anti-ribosomal P protein antibody testing for the diagnosis of neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus: an international meta-analysis. Arthritis Rheum. 54:312–324. [PubMed]

6. Hanly, J.G. 2005. Neuropsychiatric lupus. Rheum. Dis. Clin. North Am. 31:273–298. [PubMed]

7. Kozora, E., L.L. Thompson, S.G. West, and B.L. Kotzin. 1996. Analysis of cognitive and psychological deficits in systemic lupus erythematosus patients without overt central nervous system disease. Arthritis Rheum. 39:2035–2045. [PubMed]

8. Senecal, J.L., and Y. Raymond. 2004. The pathogenesis of neuropsychiatric manifestations in systemic lupus erythematosus: a disease in search of autoantibodies, or autoantibodies in search of a disease? J. Rheumatol. 31:2093–2098. [PubMed]

9. Nived, O., G. Sturfelt, M.H. Liang, and P. De Pablo. 2003. The ACR nomenclature for CNS lupus revisited. Lupus. 12:872–876. [PubMed]

10. Gonzalez-Crespo, M.R., F.J. Blanco, A. Ramos, E. Ciruelo, I. Mateo, M.A. Lopez Pino, and J.J. Gomez-Reino. 1995. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain in systemic lupus erythematosus. Br. J. Rheumatol. 34:1055–1060. [PubMed]

11. Bonfa, E., J.L. Chu, N. Brot, and K.B. Elkon. 1987. Lupus anti-ribosomal P peptide antibodies show limited heterogeneity and are predominantly of the IgG1 and IgG2 subclasses. Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 45:129–138. [PubMed]

12. Kurki, P., T. Helve, D. Dahl, and I. Virtanen. 1986. Neurofilament antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus. J. Rheumatol. 13:69–73. [PubMed]

13. Williams, R.C., Jr., K. Sugiura, and E.M. Tan. 2004. Antibodies to microtubule-associated protein 2 in patients with neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 50:1239–1247. [PubMed]

14. Omdal, R., K. Brokstad, K. Waterloo, W. Koldingsnes, R. Jonsson, and S.I. Mellgren. 2005. Neuropsychiatric disturbances in SLE are associated with antibodies against NMDA receptors. Eur. J. Neurol. 12:392–398. [PubMed]

15. Lapteva, L., M. Nowak, C.H. Yarboro, K. Takada, T. Roebuck-Spencer, T. Weickert, J. Bleiberg, D. Rosenstein, M. Pao, N. Patronas, et al. 2006. Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antibodies, cognitive dysfunction, and depression in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 54:2505–2514. [PubMed]

16. Conti, F., C. Alessandri, D. Bompane, M. Bombardieri, F.R. Spinelli, A.C. Rusconi, and G. Valesini. 2004. Autoantibody profile in systemic lupus erythematosus with psychiatric manifestations: a role for anti-endothelial-cell antibodies. Arthritis Res. Ther. 6:R366–R372. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

17. Bluestein, H.G. 1997. Antibodies to brain. In Dubois' Lupus Erythematosus. Fifth edition. D.J. Wallace and B.H. Hahn, editors. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore. 517–522.

18. Whitney, K.D., and J.O. McNamara. 1999. Autoimmunity and neurological disease: antibody modulation of synaptic transmission. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 22:175–195. [PubMed]

19. DeGiorgio, L.A., K.N. Konstantinov, S.C. Lee, J.A. Hardin, B.T. Volpe, and B. Diamond. 2001. A subset of lupus anti-DNA antibodies cross-reacts with the NR2 glutamate receptor in systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat. Med. 7:1189–1193. [PubMed]

20. Kowal, C., L.A. DeGiorgio, T. Nakaoka, H. Hetherington, P.T. Huerta, B. Diamond, and B.T. Volpe. 2004. Cognition and immunity; antibody impairs memory. Immunity. 21:179–188. [PubMed]

21. Huerta, P.T., C. Kowal, L.A. DeGiorgio, B.T. Volpe, and B. Diamond. 2006. Immunity and behavior: antibodies alter emotion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103:678–683. [PubMed]

22. Kowal, C., L.A. DeGiorgio, J.Y. Lee, M.A. Edgar, P.T. Huerta, B.T. Volpe, and B. Diamond. 2006. From the cover: human lupus autoantibodies against NMDA receptors mediate cognitive impairment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103:19854–19859. [PubMed]

23. Elkon, K.B., A.P. Parnassa, and C.L. Foster. 1985. Lupus autoantibodies target ribosomal P proteins. J. Exp. Med. 162:459–471. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

24. Francoeur, A.M., C.L. Peebles, K.J. Heckman, J.C. Lee, and E.M. Tan. 1985. Identification of ribosomal protein autoantigens. J. Immunol. 135:2378–2384. [PubMed]

25. Ebert, T., J. Chapman, and Y. Shoenfeld. 2005. Anti-ribosomal P-protein and its role in psychiatric manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus: myth or reality? Lupus. 14:571–575. [PubMed]

26. Teh, L.S., and D.A. Isenberg. 1994. Antiribosomal P protein antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus. A reappraisal. Arthritis Rheum. 37:307–315. [PubMed]

27. Stafford, H.A., C.J. Anderson, and M. Reichlin. 1995. Unmasking of anti-ribosomal P autoantibodies in healthy individuals. J. Immunol. 155:2754–2761. [PubMed]

28. Pan, Z.J., C.J. Anderson, and H.A. Stafford. 1998. Anti-idiotypic antibodies prevent the serologic detection of antiribosomal P autoantibodies in healthy adults. J. Clin. Invest. 102:215–222. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

29. Bonfa, E., S.J. Golombek, L.D. Kaufman, S. Skelly, H. Weissbach, N. Brot, and K.B. Elkon. 1987. Association between lupus psychosis and anti-ribosomal P protein antibodies. N. Engl. J. Med. 317:265–271. [PubMed]

30. Reichlin, M. 2006. Autoantibodies to the ribosomal P proteins in systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin. Exp. Med. 6:49–52. [PubMed]

31. Schneebaum, A.B., J.D. Singleton, S.G. West, J.K. Blodgett, L.G. Allen, J.C. Cheronis, and B.L. Kotzin. 1991. Association of psychiatric manifestations with antibodies to ribosomal P proteins in systemic lupus erythematosus. Am. J. Med. 90:54–62. [PubMed]

32. Isshi, K., and S. Hirohata. 1996. Association of anti-ribosomal P protein antibodies with neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 39:1483–1490. [PubMed]

33. Massardo, L., P. Burgos, M.E. Martinez, R. Perez, M. Calvo, J. Barros, A. Gonzalez, and S. Jacobelli. 2002. Antiribosomal P protein antibodies in Chilean SLE patients: no association with renal disease. Lupus. 11:379–383. [PubMed]

34. Yoshio, T., D. Hirata, K. Onda, H. Nara, and S. Minota. 2005. Antiribosomal P protein antibodies in cerebrospinal fluid are associated with neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. J. Rheumatol. 32:34–39. [PubMed]

35. Golombek, S.J., F. Graus, and K.B. Elkon. 1986. Autoantibodies in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 29:1090–1097. [PubMed]

36. Katzav, A., I. Solodeev, O. Brodsky, J. Chapman, C.G. Pick, M. Blank, W. Zhang, M. Reichlin, and Y. Shoenfeld. 2007. Induction of autoimmune depression in mice by anti-ribosomal P antibodies via the limbic system. Arthritis Rheum. 56:938–948. [PubMed]

37. Reichlin, M. 2003. Ribosomal P antibodies and CNS lupus. Lupus. 12:916–918. [PubMed]

38. Gerli, R., L. Caponi, A. Tincani, R. Scorza, M.G. Sabbadini, M.G. Danieli, V. De Angelis, M. Cesarotti, M. Piccirilli, R. Quartesan, et al. 2002. Clinical and serological associations of ribosomal P autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus: prospective evaluation in a large cohort of Italian patients. Rheumatology (Oxford). 41:1357–1366. [PubMed]

39. Elkon, K., E. Bonfa, R. Llovet, W. Danho, H. Weissbach, and N. Brot. 1988. Properties of the ribosomal P2 protein autoantigen are similar to those of foreign protein antigens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 85:5186–5189. [PubMed]

40. Koren, E., M.W. Reichlin, M. Koscec, R.D. Fugate, and M. Reichlin. 1992. Autoantibodies to the ribosomal P proteins react with a plasma membrane-related target on human cells. J. Clin. Invest. 89:1236–1241. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

41. Koscec, M., E. Koren, M. Wolfson-Reichlin, R.D. Fugate, E. Trieu, I.N. Targoff, and M. Reichlin. 1997. Autoantibodies to ribosomal P proteins penetrate into live hepatocytes and cause cellular dysfunction in culture. J. Immunol. 159:2033–2041. [PubMed]

42. Salazar, G., and A. Gonzalez. 2002. Novel mechanism for regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor endocytosis revealed by protein kinase A inhibition. Mol. Biol. Cell. 13:1677–1693. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

43. Bravo-Zehnder, M., P. Orio, A. Norambuena, M. Wallner, P. Meera, L. Toro, R. Latorre, and A. Gonzalez. 2000. Apical sorting of a voltage- and Ca2+-activated K+ channel alpha-subunit in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells is independent of N-glycosylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97:13114–13119. [PubMed]

44. Burgos, P.V., C. Klattenhoff, E. de la Fuente, A. Rigotti, and A. Gonzalez. 2004. Cholesterol depletion induces PKA-mediated basolateral-to-apical transcytosis of the scavenger receptor class B type I in MDCK cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 101:3845–3850. [PubMed]

45. Zurzolo, C., A. Le Bivic, A. Quaroni, L. Nitsch, and E. Rodriguez-Boulan. 1992. Modulation of transcytotic and direct targeting pathways in a polarized thyroid cell line. EMBO J. 11:2337–2344. [PubMed]

46. Nagy, A., and A.V. Delgado-Escueta. 1984. Rapid preparation of synaptosomes from mammalian brain using nontoxic isoosmotic gradient material (Percoll). J. Neurochem. 43:1114–1123. [PubMed]

47. Castle, J.D. 1995. Extraction of extrinsic proteins from membrane using sodium carbonate. In Current Protocols in Protein Science. J.E. Coligan, B.M. Dann, H.L. Ploegh, D.W. Speicher, and P.T. Wingfield, editors. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York. 42–43.

48. Ishikawa, K., T. Nagase, D. Nakajima, N. Seki, M. Ohira, N. Miyajima, A. Tanaka, H. Kotani, N. Nomura, and O. Ohara. 1997. Prediction of the coding sequences of unidentified human genes. VIII. 78 new cDNA clones from brain which code for large proteins in vitro. DNA Res. 4:307–313. [PubMed]

49. Ott, C.M., and V.R. Lingappa. 2002. Integral membrane protein biosynthesis: why topology is hard to predict. J. Cell Sci. 115:2003–2009. [PubMed]

50. Elofsson, A., and G. von Heijne. 2007. Membrane protein structure: prediction versus reality. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 76:125–140. [PubMed]

51. Hasler, P., N. Brot, H. Weissbach, W. Danho, Y. Blount, J.L. Zhou, and K.B. Elkon. 1994. The effect of phosphorylation and site-specific mutations in the immunodominant epitope of the human ribosomal P proteins. Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 72:273–279. [PubMed]

52. Mahler, M., K. Kessenbrock, J. Raats, R. Williams, M.J. Fritzler, and M. Bluthner. 2003. Characterization of the human autoimmune response to the major C-terminal epitope of the ribosomal P proteins. J. Mol. Med. 81:194–204. [PubMed]

53. Mahler, M., K. Kessenbrock, J. Raats, and M.J. Fritzler. 2004. Technical and clinical evaluation of anti-ribosomal P protein immunoassays. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 18:215–223. [PubMed]

54. Lopez Bergami, P., P. Mateos, J. Hoebeke, M.J. Levin, and A. Baldi. 2003. Sequence analysis, expression, and paratope characterization of a single-chain Fv fragment for the eukaryote ribosomal P proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 301:819–824. [PubMed]

55. Schwaber, J.S., C. Sternini, N.C. Brecha, W.T. Rogers, and J.P. Card. 1988. Neurons containing calcitonin gene-related peptide in the parabrachial nucleus project to the central nucleus of the amygdala. J. Comp. Neurol. 270:416–426, 398.–399. [PubMed]

56. Orrenius, S., B. Zhivotovsky, and P. Nicotera. 2003. Regulation of cell death: the calcium-apoptosis link. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4:552–565. [PubMed]

57. Pisetsky, D.S. 2006. Fulfilling Koch's postulates of autoimmunity: anti-NR2 antibodies in mice and men. Arthritis Rheum. 54:2349–2352. [PubMed]

58. McGaugh, J.L. 2004. The amygdala modulates the consolidation of memories of emotionally arousing experiences. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 27:1–28. [PubMed]

59. Kandel, E., I. Kupfermann, and S. Iversen. 2000. Learning and memory. In Principles of Neural Science. E. Kandel, J. Schwartz, and T. Jessell, editors. Elsevier Science Publishing Co. Inc., New York. 1227–1246.

60. Kauer, J.A. 2004. Learning mechanisms in addiction: synaptic plasticity in the ventral tegmental area as a result of exposure to drugs of abuse. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 66:447–475. [PubMed]

61. Abbott, N.J., L.L. Mendonca, and D.E. Dolman. 2003. The blood-brain barrier in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 12:908–915. [PubMed]

62. Hawkins, B.T., and T.P. Davis. 2005. The blood-brain barrier/neurovascular unit in health and disease. Pharmacol. Rev. 57:173–185. [PubMed]

63. Albert, M.L., and R.B. Darnell. 2004. Paraneoplastic neurological degenerations: keys to tumour immunity. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 4:36–44. [PubMed]

64. Rogers, S.W., P.I. Andrews, L.C. Gahring, T. Whisenand, K. Cauley, B. Crain, T.E. Hughes, S.F. Heinemann, and J.O. McNamara. 1994. Autoantibodies to glutamate receptor GluR3 in Rasmussen's encephalitis. Science. 265:648–651. [PubMed]

65. Sillevis Smitt, P., A. Kinoshita, B. De Leeuw, W. Moll, M. Coesmans, D. Jaarsma, S. Henzen-Logmans, C. Vecht, C. De Zeeuw, N. Sekiyama, et al. 2000. Paraneoplastic cerebellar ataxia due to autoantibodies against a glutamate receptor. N. Engl. J. Med. 342:21–27. [PubMed]

66. Fetissov, S.O., J. Harro, M. Jaanisk, A. Jarv, I. Podar, J. Allik, I. Nilsson, P. Sakthivel, A.K. Lefvert, and T. Hokfelt. 2005. Autoantibodies against neuropeptides are associated with psychological traits in eating disorders. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 102:14865–14870. [PubMed]

67. Loaiza, A., O.H. Porras, and L.F. Barros. 2003. Glutamate triggers rapid glucose transport stimulation in astrocytes as evidenced by real-time confocal microscopy. J. Neurosci. 23:7337–7342. [PubMed]

68. Banker, G., and K. Goslin. 1991. Rat hippocampal neurons in low density culture. In Culturing Nerve Cells. G. Banker and K. Goslin, editors. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 251–282.

69. De Ferrari, G.V., R. von Bernhardi, F.H. Calderon, S.C. Luza, and N.C. Inestrosa. 1998. Responses induced by tacrine in neuronal and non-neuronal cell lines. J. Neurosci. Res. 52:435–444. [PubMed]

70. Carcamo, C., E. Pardo, C. Oyanadel, M. Bravo-Zehnder, P. Bull, M. Caceres, J. Martinez, L. Massardo, S. Jacobelli, A. Gonzalez, and A. Soza. 2006. Galectin-8 binds specific beta1 integrins and induces polarized spreading highlighted by asymmetric lamellipodia in Jurkat T cells. Exp. Cell Res. 312:374–386. [PubMed]

71. Meynard, M.M., J.L. Valdes, M. Recabarren, M. Seron-Ferre, and F. Torrealba. 2005. Specific activation of histaminergic neurons during daily feeding anticipatory behavior in rats. Behav. Brain Res. 158:311–319. [PubMed]

72. Paxinos, G., and C. Watson. 1986. The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates. Second edition. Academic Press Inc., San Diego. 264 pp.

73. Gainetdinov, R.R., S.R. Jones, F. Fumagalli, R.M. Wightman, and M.G. Caron. 1998. Re-evaluation of the role of the dopamine transporter in dopamine system homeostasis. Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 26:148–153. [PubMed]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of
The Rockefeller University Press