PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jcellbiolHomeThe Rockefeller University PressEditorsContactInstructions for AuthorsThis issue
 
J Cell Biol. Apr 5, 1999; 145(1): 69–81.
PMCID: PMC2148216
Golgi Structure Correlates with Transitional Endoplasmic Reticulum Organization in Pichia pastoris and Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Olivia W. Rossanese, Jon Soderholm, Brooke J. Bevis, Irina B. Sears, James O'Connor, Edward K. Williamson, and Benjamin S. Glick
Department of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637
Address correspondence to Benjamin S. Glick, Department of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, The University of Chicago, 920 East 58th Street, Chicago, IL 60637. Tel.: (773) 702-5315. Fax: (773) 702-3172. E-mail: bsglick/at/midway.uchicago.edu
Received June 4, 1998; Revised February 23, 1999
Golgi stacks are often located near sites of “transitional ER” (tER), where COPII transport vesicles are produced. This juxtaposition may indicate that Golgi cisternae form at tER sites. To explore this idea, we examined two budding yeasts: Pichia pastoris, which has coherent Golgi stacks, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which has a dispersed Golgi. tER structures in the two yeasts were visualized using fusions between green fluorescent protein and COPII coat proteins. We also determined the localization of Sec12p, an ER membrane protein that initiates the COPII vesicle assembly pathway. In P. pastoris, Golgi stacks are adjacent to discrete tER sites that contain COPII coat proteins as well as Sec12p. This arrangement of the tER-Golgi system is independent of microtubules. In S. cerevisiae, COPII vesicles appear to be present throughout the cytoplasm and Sec12p is distributed throughout the ER, indicating that COPII vesicles bud from the entire ER network. We propose that P. pastoris has discrete tER sites and therefore generates coherent Golgi stacks, whereas S. cerevisiae has a delocalized tER and therefore generates a dispersed Golgi. These findings open the way for a molecular genetic analysis of tER sites.
Keywords: apparatus, Golgi; endoplasmic reticulum; Pichia; Saccharomyces; microtubules
The transitional ER (tER)1 is a specialized ER subdomain at which proteins destined for the Golgi apparatus are packaged into transport vesicles (Palade, 1975). tER sites are defined by the presence of COPII vesicles, which carry secretory cargo out of the ER (Kuehn and Schekman, 1997). Vertebrate cells contain multiple tER sites, and the COPII components Sec23p, Sec13p, and Sar1p have been localized to these sites (Orci et al., 1991; Kuge et al., 1994; Shaywitz et al., 1995; Paccaud et al., 1996; Tang et al., 1997). Although tER sites often display an elaborate architecture (Bannykh and Balch, 1997), the mechanisms that generate these structures are still mysterious.
In many cell types, ranging from algae to pancreatic acinar cells, some or all of the tER sites are directly apposed to the cis-face of Golgi stacks (Whaley, 1975; Farquhar and Palade, 1981). Such morphological data led early investigators to propose the cisternal progression model for Golgi function (Beams and Kessel, 1968; Morré, 1987). In this view, a new cis-Golgi cisterna forms by the fusion of membranes derived from the tER. The cisterna then progresses through the stack to the trans face, where it fragments into secretory vesicles. However, this model failed to explain how resident Golgi proteins maintain a polarized distribution across the stack, or why vesicles appear to bud from all Golgi cisternae. As an alternative, it was proposed that the Golgi consists of a series of stable compartments, and that transport vesicles carry the secretory cargo from one compartment to the next (Dunphy and Rothman, 1985; Farquhar, 1985; Rothman and Wieland, 1996). According to the stable compartments model, the juxtaposition of tER and Golgi structures might facilitate vesicular trafficking, but this juxtaposition would not reflect a continual formation of new Golgi cisternae.
Recently, cisternal progression has been the subject of renewed interest (Bonfanti et al., 1998). An updated model postulates that cisternal progression is coupled to retrograde vesicular transport of resident Golgi proteins (Schnepf, 1993; Mironov et al., 1997; Bannykh and Balch, 1997; Love et al., 1998). This “cisternal maturation” model can account for many experimental findings, including the polarity of the Golgi stack and the existence of Golgi-derived transport vesicles (Glick and Malhotra, 1998; Pelham, 1998).
Can the cisternal maturation model help explain why Golgi structure varies so dramatically between cell types (Mollenhauer and Morré, 1991)? If the Golgi is indeed an outgrowth of the tER, then some of the variation in Golgi structure may be due to differences in tER organization. To test this idea, we examined two budding yeasts that display different Golgi morphologies. Pichia pastoris has stacked Golgi organelles (Gould et al., 1992; Glick, 1996). By contrast, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Golgi rarely shows a stacked structure, but exists primarily as individual cisternae dispersed throughout the cytoplasm (Preuss et al., 1992). Here we demonstrate that tER organization is also fundamentally different in the two yeasts. P. pastoris contains discrete tER sites. In S. cerevisiae, the entire ER network apparently functions as tER. We suggest that fixed tER sites in P. pastoris produce coherent Golgi stacks, whereas the delocalized tER in S. cerevisiae produces a dispersed Golgi. Thus, tER organization may be a key determinant of Golgi structure in budding yeasts.
Strains and Plasmids
Yeast strains and plasmids are listed in Table TableI.I. Experiments with S. cerevisiae were carried out using strain DBY1034 and derivatives thereof. DBY1034 was transformed with plasmid pOH to obtain expression of Och1p-HA. Strain DBY1034-S13G, in which the endogenous SEC13 gene has been replaced with SEC13-GFP, was constructed as follows. The URA3 cassette from pUC1318-URA3 (Bénédetti et al., 1994) was excised with HindIII, blunted, and inserted into the SspI site of pUC19 (Yanisch-Perron et al., 1985) to create pUC19-URA3. An 1,166-bp HincII-HindIII fragment spanning the 3′ portion of SEC13 was then amplified by PCR from S. cerevisiae genomic DNA and inserted into the corresponding sites in pUC19-URA3. The resulting plasmid was mutagenized using the QuikChange kit (Stratagene Inc.) to replace the SEC13 stop codon with a SnaBI site. The EGFP gene was excised from pEGFP-1 (Clontech) with BamHI and NotI, blunted, and inserted into this SnaBI site. The resulting construct was linearized at the unique BstEII site and integrated into the chromosomal SEC13 gene. This “pop-in” strain was then plated on 5-fluoroorotic acid (Rothstein, 1991) to select for the “pop-out” recombinant strain DBY1034-S13G. Strain DBY1034-S23G, in which the endogenous SEC23 gene has been replaced with SEC23-GFP, was constructed in the same manner, beginning with the insertion into pUC19-URA3 of a 1,120-bp AflII-HindIII fragment spanning the 3′ portion of SEC23. Similar strategies were used to replace the endogenous SEC24 and SEC31 genes with EGFP fusion genes. To construct strain DBY1034-S12m, in which the endogenous SEC12 gene has been replaced with SEC12-myc, a 1,685-bp HincII-XbaI fragment spanning the 3′ portion of SEC12 was inserted into pUC19-URA3; a c-myc epitope sequence was then inserted before the stop codon using the QuikChange kit, and the resulting construct was linearized with SspI for “pop-in” integration into the SEC12 locus.
Table I
Table I
Marker Proteins, Yeast Strains, and Yeast Plasmids Used in This Study
Experiments with P. pastoris were carried out using the prototrophic wild-type strain PPY1 or the isogenic his4 arg4 auxotroph PPY12 and derivatives thereof (Table (TableI).I). General methods for growth and transformation of P. pastoris have been described elsewhere (Sears et al., 1998). Strain PPY12-OH, which expresses Och1p-HA, was constructed as follows. A modified gene encoding tagged Och1p (Chapman and Munro, 1994) was excised from plasmid pOCHFT (a gift of Sean Munro, Medical Research Council, Cambridge, UK) by digesting at an upstream HindIII site (sequence including the start codon: AAGCTTAGAGATCATG), blunting, and digesting at an XbaI site immediately after the stop codon. This fragment was subcloned into pIB2 (Sears et al., 1998) that had been digested with SmaI and SpeI. The resulting plasmid was digested with BstEII and PstI, and the corresponding BstEII-PstI fragment from pOH was inserted to create pIB2-OH, in which a gene encoding triple-hemagglutinin epitope (HA)–tagged Och1p is downstream of the strong constitutive GAP promoter. pIB2-OH was linearized with SalI and integrated into the his4 locus of PPY12. Strain PPY12-S13G, in which the endogenous SEC13 gene has been replaced with SEC13-GFP, was constructed as follows. pSG464 (Gould et al., 1992) was digested with SnaBI and NdeI, blunted, and religated to yield pUC19-ARG4. This plasmid lacks the PARS2 sequence present in pSG464, and therefore can only transform P. pastoris by integration. A 461-bp HindIII-NsiI fragment spanning the 3′ end of SEC13 was then amplified by PCR from P. pastoris genomic DNA and inserted into pUC19-ARG4 that had been cut with HindIII and PstI. This plasmid was mutagenized to replace the SEC13 stop codon with a SnaBI site, and the EGFP gene was inserted into this site as described above. The resulting construct was linearized at the unique MscI site and integrated into the chromosomal SEC13 gene, yielding an intact SEC13-GFP fusion gene plus a 3′ fragment of authentic SEC13. A similar strategy was used to create strain PPY12-S12m: a 1,328-bp BamHI fragment spanning the 3′ end of SEC12 was inserted into pUC19-ARG4; a c-myc epitope sequence was then inserted just upstream of the HDEL sequence, and the resulting construct was linearized with XhoI for integration into the SEC12 locus. To express myc-tagged S. cerevisiae Mnt1p (Chapman and Munro, 1994) in P. pastoris, the gene encoding tagged Mnt1p was excised from pYMT1BS (a gift of Sean Munro) and subcloned into pOW3, a P. pastoris episomal vector that contains the GAP promoter (Gould et al., 1992; Waterham et al., 1997; O.W. Rossanese, unpublished observations).
Plasmid pAFB584, which encodes glutathione S-transferase fused to the NH2-terminal acidic domain of S. cerevisiae Sec7p (up to the NaeI site in the coding sequence), was provided by Alex Franzusoff (University of Colorado, Denver, CO).
Nocodazole Treatment
P. pastoris cultures were grown overnight at 30°C to an OD600 of ~0.15 in 1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 2% glucose, 20 mg/liter adenine sulfate, 20 mg/liter uracil, 50 mM sodium maleate, pH 5.5. Half of a culture then received nocodazole at a final concentration of 15 μg/ml, diluted from a 10 mg/ml stock solution in water-free dimethyl sulfoxide. As a control, the other half of the culture received only dimethyl sulfoxide. Incubation was continued for up to 2.5 h, and the cells were fixed for microscopy.
Antibodies for Immunofluorescence
Anti–HA monoclonal antibody (16B12; Berkeley Antibody Co.), anti– myc monoclonal antibody (9E10; Boehringer Mannheim Biochemicals) and anti–green fluorescent protein (GFP) monoclonal antibody (a mixture from clones 7.1 and 13.1; Boehringer Mannheim Biochemicals) were used at 5 μg/ml; in cells not expressing a tagged protein, each antibody gave only a faint background signal. The anti–GFP antibody was used to supplement the endogenous GFP signal, which is diminished by the immunofluorescence procedure. Anti–β-tubulin monoclonal antibody (KMX-1; Boehringer Mannheim Biochemicals) was used at 1 μg/ml. The following rabbit polyclonal antibodies were used. Anti–Pdi1p serum (a gift of Peter Walter, University of California, San Francisco, CA; originally produced by Victoria Hines, Chiron Corp., Emeryville, CA), raised against SDS-PAGE–purified S. cerevisiae Pdi1p, was used at a dilution of 1:350. Alex Franzusoff generously provided an antiserum raised against a fusion between β-galactosidase and the NH2-terminal portion of Sec7p (Franzusoff et al., 1991); this antibody was used at a dilution of 1:500. Oregon green 488–conjugated goat anti–mouse IgG and Texas red-X–conjugated goat anti–rabbit IgG (Molecular Probes, Inc.) were used at 20 μg/ml.
Controls were performed (not shown) to check the specificity of the polyclonal antibodies. In the case of anti–Pdi1p, the immunofluorescence signal could be quenched by preincubating with a protein fragment (a gift of Robert Freedman, University of Kent at Canterbury, UK) comprising the COOH-terminal 308 residues of S. cerevisiae Pdi1p. The anti–Sec7p antibody specifically recognized a glutathione S-transferase–Sec7p fusion protein on an immunoblot of an extract from Escherichia coli cells expressing this protein.
Many rabbit antisera contain traces of reactivity against α-1,6-mannose linkages, and because S. cerevisiae and P. pastoris both add α-1,6-mannose residues to glycoproteins transiting through the Golgi (Orlean, 1997; Trimble et al., 1991), these contaminating antibodies give a spurious labeling of Golgi structures (not shown). With S. cerevisiae, anti–α-1,6-mannose antibodies label Golgi cisternae in immunoelectron microscopy experiments (Preuss et al., 1992); and when used at very high dilutions for immunofluorescence, such antibodies primarily label early Golgi elements. Similarly, with P. pastoris, anti–α-1,6-mannose antibodies give a strong and relatively specific Golgi labeling. In several cases, we observed punctate staining with antisera raised against various COPII proteins, but this staining was actually due to contaminating anti–α-1,6-mannose antibodies. This problem can be avoided by preincubating a diluted antibody either with fixed S. cerevisiae cells or with 0.5 mg/ml purified yeast mannan (M-7504; Sigma Chemical Co.).
Electron Microscopy
Thin-section electron microscopy was performed essentially as described (Kaiser and Schekman, 1990; Gould et al., 1992). In brief, a 50-ml culture of yeast cells in rich glucose medium was grown to an OD600 of ~0.5. The culture was concentrated to a volume of <5 ml with a bottle-top vacuum filter, and 40 ml of ice-cold 50 mM KPi, pH 6.8, 1 mM MgCl2, 2% glutaraldehyde was added rapidly with swirling. After fixation for 1 h on ice, the cells were washed repeatedly, and then resuspended in 0.75 ml 4% KMnO4 and mixed for 1 h at room temperature. The cells were washed, and then resuspended in 0.75 ml 2% uranyl acetate and mixed for 1 h at room temperature. Finally, the cells were embedded in Spurrs resin; 50 ml of yeast culture yielded enough cells for three BEEM capsules. The resin was polymerized for 2 d at 68°C. Sections were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and viewed on an electron microscope (100 CXII; JEOL U.S.A. Inc.).
For immunoelectron microscopy, we used a modification of previously published methods (Kärgel et al., 1996; Rieder et al., 1996). A 50-ml log-phase culture was concentrated to a volume of <5 ml (see above) and fixed by adding 40 ml of 50 mM KPi, pH 6.8, 1 mM MgCl2, 4% formaldehyde, 0.1% glutaraldehyde (aldehydes were EM grade from Ted Pella, Redding, CA). After 1 h at room temperature, the cells were washed twice with 20 ml PBS, pH 7.4, containing 0.5% 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.5 mM o-phenanthroline, 0.25 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 μM pepstatin, and then once more with 1 ml of the same solution. Treatment with periodate was omitted because this compound may destroy certain antigens by reacting with amino acid side chains (Clamp and Hough, 1965). The washed cells were embedded in 100 μl of low-melting–temperature agarose, which was cut into cubic-millimeter blocks and infiltrated for 2 h at room temperature in 1.7 M sucrose, 25% polyvinylpyrrolidone K15 (Fluka Chemical Corp.) in PBS, prepared according to Tokuyasu (1989). Individual agarose blocks were then mounted on copper pins, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and cryosectioned at −80°C. Thawed cryosections were prepared and labeled as described (Griffiths, 1993; Kärgel et al., 1996), using a blocking buffer consisting of PBS, 20 mM glycine, 1% fish gelatin (Sigma Chemical Co.), and 10% fetal calf serum; the serum had been heated at 60°C for 1 h, and then centrifuged to remove complement. Dilutions were 1:10 for an affinity-purified polyclonal anti–HA antibody (a gift of Jan Burkhardt, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL), 1:25 for an affinity-purified polyclonal anti–GFP antibody (a gift of Charles Zuker, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA), and 1:50 for protein A-gold (10 nm; Goldmark Biologicals). After the protein A-gold step, the sections were postfixed for 30 min in 1% glutaraldehyde in PBS, and then washed with distilled water and stained with 1.5% silicotungstic acid in 2.5% polyvinyl alcohol (MW 15,000; ICN Biomedicals Inc.). The best results were obtained using relatively thick sections and a thin layer of stain.
Electron micrographs were digitized and imported into Photoshop (Adobe Systems Inc.) to adjust brightness and contrast and to create composite images. For Figs. Figs.33 and and7,7, the gold particles were darkened to improve visualization. Images were printed on an NP-1600 dye-sublimation printer (Codonics).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Immunoelectron microscopy of a Golgi marker in P. pastoris. P. pastoris cells of strain PPY12-OH were fixed and cryosectioned, and then incubated with a polyclonal anti–HA antibody followed by protein A-gold to detect Och1p-HA. Gold particles (more ...)
Figure 7
Figure 7
Immunoelectron microscopy of a tER marker in P. pastoris. P. pastoris cells of strain PPY12-S13G were fixed and cryosectioned. The localization of Sec13p-GFP was determined by incubating with a polyclonal anti–GFP antibody followed by protein (more ...)
Immunofluorescence Microscopy
We modified previously described methods (Pringle et al., 1991) to enhance both the preservation and the visualization of intracellular structures. Improved preservation was achieved by rapidly digesting the cell wall with protease-free lyticase in sorbitol-free wash buffer, and by postfixing the cells in acetone. Improved visualization was achieved by adhering the cells directly to coverslips (Weiss et al., 1989; Hell and Stelzer, 1995) rather than to wells on a slide. A detailed protocol follows.
Fixation and Spheroplasting.
A yeast culture is grown overnight in rich or selective medium with good aeration to an OD600 of 0.25–1.0. 8 ml of this culture is pipetted onto a 150-ml bottle-top filter, and the liquid is removed by vacuum. The cells are immediately resuspended in 5 ml of freshly prepared 50 mM KPi, pH 6.5, 1 mM MgCl2, 4% formaldehyde (EM grade; Ted Pella). After fixation for 2 h at room temperature in a 15-ml tube (Falcon Labware), the cells were centrifuged for 3 min at 1,000 g (2,000 rpm) in a tabletop centrifuge, and the supernatant is aspirated completely with a Pasteur pipet. The cells are resuspended in 5 ml of freshly prepared wash buffer (100 mM KPi, pH 7.5, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.25 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 μM pepstatin), and then centrifuged again as above. Finally, the cells are resuspended in wash buffer to an OD600 of 10. To 100 μl of concentrated cell suspension is added 0.6 μl of 2-mercaptoethanol followed by 20 μl of recombinant yeast lytic enzyme (20,000 U/ml; ICN Biomedicals Inc.). After mixing end-over-end for 15–30 min at room temperature, the spheroplasts are centrifuged for 2 min at 400 g (2,000 rpm) in a microfuge, gently resuspended in 100 μl wash buffer, and then centrifuged and resuspended once again.
Adhesion and Permeabilization.
To create “wells” on a coverslip, a suitable piece is cut from the adhesive backing of an express courier document pouch, holes are made with a rotating-head hole punch, and the perforated plastic is attached to the coverslip. 10 μl of 0.1% polylysine (P-1524; Sigma Chemical Co.) is added to each well, and then removed by vacuum aspiration. Each well is washed three times with water, and 10 μl of spheroplast suspension is added. After 3 min, excess liquid is blotted off with a cotton swab, and the dried coverslip is immersed in 40 ml of acetone precooled to −20°C in a 50-ml tube (Falcon Labware). (This organic solvent fixation step is important for preserving tER and Golgi structure. For some antigens methanol works better, but in most cases acetone is superior.) After 5 min, the coverslip is removed, inverted onto a paper towel to blot off excess solvent, and allowed to dry.
Antibody Incubations.
Each well is precoated for 30 min with a drop of PBS-Block (PBS, pH 7.4, 1% dried milk, 0.1% bovine serum albumin, 0.1% octyl glucoside). 10 μl of primary antibody mixture in PBS block is then added, and the coverslip is incubated in a humid chamber for 1 h. Each well is washed eight times with PBS block, and 10 μl of secondary antibody mixture in PBS block is added. 2 μg/ml 33258 (Hoechst AG) is included in the secondary antibody solution to stain DNA. After a 30-min incubation in the dark, each well is washed eight times with PBS block. The liquid is aspirated completely after the final wash. Each well then receives 5 μl of phenylenediamine-containing mounting medium (Pringle et al., 1991). The coverslip is inverted onto a slide and sealed with nail polish.
Microscopy.
Samples were viewed on an Axioplan microscope equipped with a 100× Plan-Apo 1.4 NA objective (Carl Zeiss, Inc.) and with band-pass filters for visualizing Hoechst dye, fluorescein/Oregon green, and Texas red. Images were captured with a Photometrics CCD camera using the Openlab software package (Improvision). For each field of cells, multiple images were recorded from focal planes spaced 0.2 μM apart; three to four of these images were deblurred using a simple deconvolution algorithm, and then combined to form a single projected image. Where indicated, the same cells were also photographed in differential interference contrast (DIC) mode at a single focal plane. Photoshop was used for colorization, adjustments of brightness and contrast, and creation of composite and merged images. Manipulations with the Openlab and Photoshop programs improved the quality of the images, but did not significantly alter their information content. Fluorescence and DIC images were printed on a Stylus Photo color inkjet printer (Epson Electronics America Inc.).
To quantify the overlap between Och1p-HA and Sec7p, digital images were examined with Photoshop. Cells that showed clear staining with both antibodies were used for quantitation. A spot of one color was scored as overlapping with a spot of the second color if the center of the first spot was contained within the second spot. To estimate the percentage of Golgi structures that are perinuclear in P. pastoris, the perinuclear and peripheral Och1p-HA spots were counted in 50 cells that showed faint nuclear envelope staining (see Fig. Fig.22 C). To estimate the average percentage of the cell area occupied by fluorescent spots of a given marker protein, 25 cells stained to reveal Och1p-HA and Sec7p were analyzed using NIH Image (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/nih-image/): the total areas of the Och1p-HA and Sec7p spots were summed and divided by twice the total areas of the cells.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Immunofluorescence staining of Golgi and ER structures. (A) Golgi labeling in S. cerevisiae. Fixed cells of strain DBY1034/pOH were incubated with a monoclonal anti–HA antibody to label Och1p-HA, followed by Oregon green–conjugated (more ...)
Visualization of GFP Fusion Proteins in Intact Cells
Yeast cells expressing a GFP-labeled COPII protein were grown to log phase with good aeration. A 400-μl aliquot of the culture was then mixed rapidly with 400 μl of 100 mM KPi, pH 6.5, 2 mM MgCl2, 8% formaldehyde, 0.5% glutaraldehyde. After fixation for 1 h in the dark, the cells were washed twice with 1 ml PBS, and then resuspended in 50 μl PBS. For viewing by fluorescence microscopy, 1–2 μl of the resuspended cells were spotted on a slide and spread with a coverslip.
Golgi Stacks in P. pastoris Are Closely Associated with tER Sites
Stacks of Golgi cisternae can be readily visualized in P. pastoris cells, with each stack containing about four cisternae (Fig. (Fig.1)1) (Gould et al., 1992; Glick, 1996). Previously published images of P. pastoris showed Golgi stacks near the nucleus (Gould et al., 1992; Rambourg et al., 1995; Glick, 1996). Golgi structures might form by growing out of the nuclear envelope, which constitutes a large fraction of the ER in budding yeasts (Preuss et al., 1991). Alternatively, P. pastoris Golgi stacks might be positioned near the nucleus by microtubule-dependent transport toward the centrosome, as occurs in vertebrate cells (Thyberg and Moskalewski, 1985; Kreis, 1990; Lippincott-Schwartz, 1998). Such a role for microtubules is excluded by the following two observations.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Thin-section electron microscopy of Golgi and ER structures in P. pastoris. (A) A representative P. pastoris cell. Golgi stacks are found adjacent to ER membranes, including both the nuclear envelope and peripheral ER elements. (B) A representative (more ...)
First, thin-section electron microscopy indicates that a typical P. pastoris cell contains several distinct Golgi stacks, only some of which are located near the nucleus (Fig. (Fig.11 A). Other Golgi stacks are found next to the peripheral ER elements that underlie the plasma membrane. Second, treatment of P. pastoris cells with nocodazole does not visibly alter the structure or positioning of Golgi stacks (Fig. (Fig.11 B). As with S. cerevisiae (Jacobs et al., 1988), nocodazole treatment of P. pastoris disrupts microtubules and inhibits nuclear division (see Fig. Fig.4),4), but Golgi stacks are still observed next to the nuclear envelope and peripheral ER. In both untreated and nocodazole-treated cells, vesicular profiles are frequently seen in ER regions adjacent to the Golgi cisternae (Fig. (Fig.1)1) (Gould et al., 1992; Glick, 1996). These vesiculating ER regions resemble the tER sites seen in vertebrate cells (Palade, 1975; Bannykh and Balch, 1997). Hence, the morphological data suggest that Golgi stacks in P. pastoris are associated not with the centrosome, but rather with tER sites.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Immunofluorescence analysis of nocodazole-treated P. pastoris cells. (A) DNA, tubulin, and Sec7p distributions in untreated P. pastoris cells. Fixed cells of strain PPY12 were incubated with Hoechst dye to stain DNA. Microtubules were visualized with (more ...)
Comparison of ER and Golgi Structures in the Two Yeasts by Immunostaining
Electron microscopy indicates that general ER structure is similar in P. pastoris and S. cerevisiae, but that Golgi organelles in P. pastoris are more coherent (see above). We confirmed this interpretation by visualizing various marker proteins (Table (TableI)I) using immunofluorescence microscopy. For these experiments, we developed a modified immunofluorescence protocol that consistently yields high-quality images (see Materials and Methods). Because P. pastoris is closely related to S. cerevisiae (Higgins and Cregg, 1998), polyclonal antibodies raised against S. cerevisiae antigens often cross-react with the P. pastoris homologues. Alternatively, marker proteins were modified with epitope tags and visualized using specific monoclonal antibodies.
To visualize the general ER in P. pastoris, fixed cells were labeled with an antibody against protein disulfide isomerase (Pdi1p), a marker for the general ER (Fig. (Fig.22 D, red) (Sitia and Meldolesi, 1992; Nishikawa et al., 1994). The same cells were also incubated with Hoechst dye (Fig. (Fig.22 D, blue) to label DNA. The anti–Pdi1p antibody highlights the nuclear envelope as well as peripheral ER elements. This pattern resembles the ER distribution seen in S. cerevisiae (Rose et al., 1989; Preuss et al., 1991).
Fig. Fig.22 A shows the S. cerevisiae Golgi. This organelle appears in immunofluorescence images as a set of punctate spots, with different Golgi markers often displaying only a partially overlapping localization (Segev et al., 1988; Franzusoff et al., 1991; Antebi and Fink, 1992; Lussier et al., 1995). In S. cerevisiae cells expressing an HA-tagged version of the early Golgi marker Och1p (Nakayama et al., 1992; Gaynor et al., 1994; Harris and Waters, 1996; Gaynor and Emr, 1997), an anti–HA monoclonal antibody (Fig. (Fig.22 A, green) reveals multiple spots of Och1p-HA labeling per cell. The same cells were also labeled with a polyclonal antibody (red) against Sec7p, a protein that is concentrated in late Golgi elements (Franzusoff et al., 1991). The two markers show no significant overlap (Fig. (Fig.22 A, Merged; Table TableII).II).
Table II
Table II
Overlap between Golgi Markers as Visualized by Immunofluorescence
Do early and late Golgi elements ever colocalize in S. cerevisiae? In temperature-sensitive sec14 mutants of S. cerevisiae, multilamellar Golgi structures accumulate at the nonpermissive temperature (Novick et al., 1980; Rambourg et al., 1996); these structures are reminiscent of the Golgi stacks seen in higher eukaryotes. Therefore, we tested whether Och1p-HA and Sec7p colocalize in a sec14 mutant after incubation at the nonpermissive temperature of 37°C. The 37°C treatment causes redistribution of Sec7p into large clusters (Fig. (Fig.22 B, red) (Franzusoff et al., 1991). However, the staining pattern of Och1p-HA is largely unchanged in the sec14 mutant (Fig. (Fig.22 B, green), and there is still no significant overlap between Och1p-HA and Sec7p. It seems that S. cerevisiae is incapable of generating coherent Golgi stacks that contain both early and late Golgi proteins.
Fig. Fig.22 C shows the P. pastoris Golgi. Using an integrating expression vector (Sears et al., 1998), we generated a P. pastoris strain that stably expresses HA-tagged S. cerevisiae Och1p. P. pastoris contains an α-1,6-mannosyltransferase activity like that ascribed to Och1p (Trimble et al., 1991; Nakanishi-Shindo et al., 1993), and expression of Och1p-HA in P. pastoris has no effect on growth or Golgi morphology (not shown). Och1p-HA localizes to two to six spots per P. pastoris cell (Fig. (Fig.22 C, green). As predicted from electron microscopy, a subset (~45%) of the Och1p-HA spots clearly adjoin the nucleus (see Fig. Fig.22 C, legend). When P. pastoris cells are labeled with the antibody against S. cerevisiae Sec7p, two to six spots are again detected (Fig. (Fig.22 C, red), presumably because this antibody reacts with the P. pastoris homologue of Sec7p. By contrast to the situation in S. cerevisiae, Och1p-HA and Sec7p exhibit nearly quantitative overlap in P. pastoris (Fig. (Fig.22 C, Merged; Table TableII).II). Similarly, when a tagged version of the S. cerevisiae medial-Golgi protein Kre2p/Mnt1p (Chapman and Munro, 1994; Lussier et al., 1995) is expressed in P. pastoris, it colocalizes with Sec7p (not shown). Colocalization at the light microscopy level indicates that two markers are either in the same compartment or in closely apposed structures. These data support the conclusion that Golgi organelles are more coherent in P. pastoris than in S. cerevisiae.
To confirm that the structures visualized in P. pastoris by immunofluorescence are indeed Golgi membranes, we performed immunoelectron microscopy on thawed cryosections. Using a polyclonal anti–HA antibody to detect Och1p-HA, we see a specific labeling of Golgi stacks (Fig. (Fig.3;3; Table III).
Table III
Table III
Quantitation of Immunoelectron Microscopy Data for P. pastoris
Golgi Organization in P. pastoris Is Unaffected by Microtubule Disruption or Cell Cycle Progression
P. pastoris resembles vertebrate cells in having stacked Golgi cisternae. We tested whether the two cell types are also similar with regard to Golgi dynamics. Pre-Golgi elements in vertebrate cells are transported along microtubules (Lippincott-Schwartz, 1998), but our electron microscopy data indicate that in P. pastoris, microtubules do not influence Golgi structure (see Fig. Fig.1).1). This conclusion was confirmed at the immunofluorescence level. In untreated P. pastoris cells, microtubules are present and nuclei partition into daughter cells during mitosis (Fig. (Fig.44 A). Microtubule distribution shows no detectable relationship to Golgi distribution (Fig. (Fig.44 A). Nocodazole treatment depolymerizes microtubules and blocks nuclear migration, but the Golgi staining pattern is unaffected (Fig. (Fig.44 B). Moreover, the Golgi markers Sec7p and Och1p-HA still colocalize in nocodazole-treated P. pastoris cells (not shown).
To determine whether cell cycle progression alters Golgi organization in P. pastoris, as it does in vertebrate cells (Rabouille and Warren, 1997), we analyzed P. pastoris in the G1, S/G2, and M phases of the cell cycle. Immunofluorescence was used to quantify the average number of Golgi structures per cell. This number is similar in each phase of the cell cycle (Table (TableIV).IV). Thus, when observing P. pastoris under a variety of conditions, we consistently find that each cell contains a small number of distinct Golgi stacks.
Table IV
Table IV
The P. pastoris Golgi Retains Its Organization Throughout the Cell Cycle
COPII Coat Proteins Show Different Distributions in S. cerevisiae and P. pastoris
The electron microscopy data suggest that P. pastoris contains discrete tER sites, whereas S. cerevisiae lacks such sites. To explore this idea further, we compared the localizations of COPII proteins in the two yeasts. GFP was fused to the COOH terminus of S. cerevisiae Sec13p, a coat protein that is incorporated at a late stage of COPII vesicle assembly (Pryer et al., 1993; Kuehn and Schekman, 1997). Replacement of the endogenous SEC13 gene with the SEC13-GFP gene has no detectable effect on cell growth, indicating that the Sec13p-GFP fusion can perform the essential function of Sec13p (Pryer et al., 1993). When S. cerevisiae cells expressing Sec13p-GFP are viewed by fluorescence microscopy, each cell contains ~30–50 tiny spots (shown in Fig. Fig.55 A, although this pattern is difficult to photograph accurately). The spots are distributed almost evenly throughout the cytoplasm, with some cells showing an apparent concentration of spots on the nuclear envelope. We surmise that these spots represent individual COPII vesicles. A vesicle is smaller than the resolution limit of light microscopy (Lacey, 1989), so the apparent size of the spots is probably misleading, but a single COPII vesicle contains many copies of Sec13p-GFP and hence should produce a detectable fluorescence signal. GFP was also fused to three other S. cerevisiae COPII coat proteins (Kuehn and Schekman, 1997): Sec23p, Sec24p, and Sec31p. All of these fusions are functional, and they all give the same fluorescence pattern as Sec13p-GFP (Fig. (Fig.55 B and data not shown), indicating that we have visualized the normal distribution of COPII vesicles. These results strongly support the notion that COPII vesicles bud from the entire ER in S. cerevisiae.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Visualization of GFP-labeled COPII coat proteins in intact S. cerevisiae cells. (A) Sec13p-GFP fluorescence in S. cerevisiae. Cells of strain DBY1034-S13G were fixed and viewed directly. The same cells were imaged in DIC and fluorescence modes. (B) (more ...)
In parallel, the P. pastoris SEC13 gene was replaced with a SEC13-GFP fusion gene. The resulting fluorescence pattern is strikingly different from that seen in S. cerevisiae. Sec13p-GFP in P. pastoris is concentrated in only two to six large spots per cell (Fig. (Fig.66 A). When examined by immunofluorescence microscopy, the Sec13p-GFP spots are adjacent to, but not quite overlapping, the Golgi spots marked by the anti–Sec7p antibody (Fig. (Fig.66 B). This result suggests that Sec13p-GFP is localized to tER sites. Indeed, immunoelectron microscopy with an anti–GFP antibody revealed that Sec13p-GFP is present on tubulovesicular structures at the interface between ER membranes and Golgi stacks (Fig. (Fig.7;7; Table III). We conclude that COPII vesicle budding is restricted to discrete tER sites in P. pastoris.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Visualization of Sec13p-GFP in P. pastoris. (A) Sec13p-GFP fluorescence in intact cells. P. pastoris cells of strain PPY12-S13G were fixed and viewed directly. DIC and fluorescence images were collected separately, and then combined to generate the (more ...)
Sec12p Localizes to tER Sites in P. pastoris
The earliest known player in the COPII assembly pathway is Sec12p, a membrane-bound guanine nucleotide exchange factor that recruits the small GTPase Sar1p to the ER membrane (Nakano et al., 1988; Nakano and Muramatsu, 1989; Barlowe and Schekman, 1993; Kuehn and Schekman, 1997). In previous studies of S. cerevisiae, Sec12p exhibited general ER staining (Nishikawa and Nakano, 1991, 1993). Our results confirm those earlier findings. S. cerevisiae Sec12p has traditionally been visualized in strains overexpressing this protein (Nishikawa and Nakano, 1993; Nishikawa et al., 1994). To eliminate possible ambiguities resulting from overexpression, we replaced the chromosomal SEC12 gene with a myc-tagged version. The resulting strain grows like the wild-type (not shown), implying that Sec12p-myc can functionally replace the essential wild-type protein (Nakano et al., 1988). Sec12p-myc (Fig. (Fig.88 A, green) colocalizes with Pdi1p (Fig. (Fig.88 A, red) in the nuclear envelope and in peripheral ER membranes. Although Sec12p-myc sometimes shows a discontinuous staining pattern, the fluorescence signal is relatively weak, and we have observed that the ER network often appears discontinuous when it is weakly stained (not shown). Hence, the combined data suggest that Sec12p-myc is present throughout the ER in S. cerevisiae.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Immunofluorescence localization of tagged Sec12p in the two yeasts. (A) Colocalization of Sec12p-myc with Pdi1p in S. cerevisiae. Fixed cells of strain DBY1034-S12m were incubated with a monoclonal anti– myc antibody followed by Oregon green–conjugated (more ...)
We also replaced P. pastoris SEC12 with a myc-tagged version. Once again the fluorescence signal is weak, but the pattern is clearly visible. In this case, the anti–myc antibody does not give a general ER staining, but instead labels several spots per cell (Fig. (Fig.88 B, green). Like Sec13p-GFP (see above), Sec12p-myc localizes to sites that are immediately adjacent to Sec7p-containing Golgi structures (Fig. (Fig.88 B). Thus, in P. pastoris, components at both early and late stages of the COPII assembly pathway are concentrated at tER sites.
Why is the Golgi apparatus more photogenic in P. pastoris than in S. cerevisiae? These two yeasts are morphologically very similar; yet Golgi cisternae in P. pastoris are organized into stacks, whereas Golgi cisternae in S. cerevisiae are scattered throughout the cytoplasm. We propose the following hypothesis. In P. pastoris, COPII vesicles bud from fixed tER sites, and then fuse with one another to create new Golgi cisternae, which mature to yield polarized stacks (Glick and Malhotra, 1998). In S. cerevisiae, COPII vesicles bud throughout the ER, and therefore each Golgi cisterna forms at a different location (Fig. (Fig.9).9).
Figure 9
Figure 9
Summary and interpretation of the experimental data. P. pastoris contains discrete tER sites that produce coherent Golgi stacks. In S. cerevisiae, COPII vesicles bud throughout the ER network, resulting in a dispersed Golgi. The shaded portions of (more ...)
Our immunofluorescence data confirm that S. cerevisiae and P. pastoris have fundamentally different Golgi structures. A hallmark of the Golgi in S. cerevisiae is that various marker proteins often show distinct punctate distributions (Antebi and Fink, 1992; Chapman and Munro, 1994; Lussier et al., 1995). For example, the early Golgi protein Och1p-HA exhibits virtually no overlap with the late Golgi protein Sec7p. Although multilamellar Golgi structures are seen in temperature-sensitive sec7 and sec14 mutants of S. cerevisiae (Novick et al., 1980; Svodoba and Necas, 1987; Rambourg et al., 1993, 1996), we find that early and late Golgi markers still do not colocalize in sec14 mutant cells (Fig. (Fig.2),2), indicating that S. cerevisiae cannot make coherent Golgi stacks. With P. pastoris, on the other hand, Och1p-HA and Sec7p overlap almost completely (Fig. (Fig.2),2), as expected if each Golgi stack represents an ordered set of early, middle, and late cisternae.
Does this difference in Golgi structure correlate with a difference in ER organization? The ER of both yeasts comprises the nuclear envelope plus peripheral elements. However, in P. pastoris, vesicles can often be seen budding specifically from regions of the ER adjacent to Golgi stacks (Fig. (Fig.1)1) (Gould et al., 1992; Glick, 1996). Such vesiculating ER regions have not been seen in S. cerevisiae (Kuehn and Schekman, 1997). These observations suggested to us that P. pastoris contains discrete tER sites, whereas S. cerevisiae does not. To test this interpretation, we used COPII coat proteins as markers for the tER (Orci et al., 1991; Kuge et al., 1994; Shaywitz et al., 1995; Paccaud et al., 1996; Tang et al., 1997). With S. cerevisiae, fusing GFP to Sec13p or other COPII coat proteins revealed many small fluorescent spots that probably represent individual COPII vesicles (Fig. (Fig.5).5). These spots are found throughout the cytoplasm, consistent with the notion that COPII vesicles bud at random from the entire ER. By contrast, a Sec13p-GFP fusion in P. pastoris localizes to a small number of discrete regions (Fig. (Fig.6).6). These regions are immediately adjacent to Golgi stacks, and they contain tubulovesicular membranes (Fig. (Fig.7).7). Hence, we propose that Sec13p-GFP marks a compartment in P. pastoris that is analogous to the tER sites described previously in vertebrate cells (Palade, 1975; Bannykh and Balch, 1997).
How is Sec13p recruited to tER sites in P. pastoris? The assembly of COPII vesicles is an ordered process that begins with the action of Sec12p (Barlowe and Schekman, 1993; Kuehn and Schekman, 1997). We compared the localization of epitope-tagged Sec12p in the two yeasts. Consistent with previous reports (Nishikawa and Nakano, 1993; Nishikawa et al., 1994), Sec12p-myc in S. cerevisiae is distributed throughout the ER. In P. pastoris, on the other hand, Sec12p-myc is concentrated at tER sites (Fig. (Fig.8).8). This observation suggests a working model for the organization of tER and Golgi compartments in the two yeasts. We postulate that in P. pastoris, Sec12p is anchored at tER sites by unknown partner proteins that comprise a “tER scaffold.” Because Sec12p initiates the assembly of COPII vesicles, these vesicles bud exclusively from tER sites, and successive Golgi cisternae form at fixed locations to generate polarized stacks. This model assumes that tER sites are relatively stable entities, and, indeed, our studies of Sec13p-GFP dynamics in P. pastoris confirm that tER sites are long lived and slow moving (B.J. Bevis, unpublished observations). The situation is quite different in S. cerevisiae—this yeast apparently lacks a tER scaffold, so Sec12p is free to diffuse throughout the ER. As a result, COPII vesicles bud from the entire ER, and successive Golgi cisternae form at different locations, yielding a dispersed organelle (Fig. (Fig.9).9). In this view, Golgi structure and positioning are strongly influenced by tER organization.
An important test of our model will be to alter tER organization in P. pastoris and ask whether Golgi structure is correspondingly affected. Such an experiment will reveal whether the existence of Golgi stacks in P. pastoris is due solely to the presence of fixed tER sites. The simplest view is that Golgi stacking is a kinetic phenomenon, with cisternal formation and maturation occurring too quickly for successive cisternae to diffuse away from one another. Alternatively, Golgi cisternae in P. pastoris might be held together by a cytosolic matrix (Mollenhauer and Morré, 1978; Cluett and Brown, 1992; Staehelin and Moore, 1995; Barr et al., 1997). These possibilities can be distinguished by generating P. pastoris mutants in which COPII proteins are delocalized, and then asking whether the loss of tER sites leads to Golgi dispersal. One promising approach focuses on determining whether P. pastoris Sec12p contains a tER localization signal that is recognized by specific partner proteins.
Although S. cerevisiae lacks discrete tER sites, this yeast can be used to explore the more general question of whether the Golgi is an outgrowth of the ER. Early in S-phase of the S. cerevisiae cell cycle, the small buds invariably contain both ER and Golgi structures (Segev et al., 1988; Redding et al., 1991; Preuss et al., 1991, 1992; O.W. Rossanese, unpublished observations). It is likely that the ER elements present in the emerging bud give rise to new Golgi cisternae. If so, mutants that fail to transport ER membranes into the bud should also lack Golgi cisternae in the bud. We are currently testing this prediction by characterizing S. cerevisiae mutants defective in Golgi inheritance.
A comparison of budding yeasts with other eukaryotes can indicate which aspects of the tER-Golgi system are cell type–specific. First, unlike many eukaryotes, S. cerevisiae contains neither stacked Golgi organelles nor discrete tER sites. It is unclear whether the absence of these structures in S. cerevisiae is adaptive, or whether it reflects a loss-of-function mutation during the evolution of this yeast. Second, tubular connections between Golgi stacks are present in vertebrate cells (Mironov et al., 1997), but have not been detected in P. pastoris, the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Chappell and Warren, 1989) or certain insect cells (Stanley et al., 1997). Third, the Golgi breaks down during mitosis in vertebrate cells (Rabouille and Warren, 1997; Acharya et al., 1998), but not in higher plants (Driouich and Staehelin, 1997) or budding yeasts (Table (TableIV)IV) (Makarow, 1988).
Which aspects of the tER-Golgi system are universal? We propose that Golgi cisternae always form by the coalescence of tER-derived membranes. This relationship is particularly evident in cells that contain Golgi stacks immediately adjacent to tER sites (Whaley, 1975; Farquhar and Palade, 1981; Bracker et al., 1996). We have now documented such an association in P. pastoris. A close apposition between tER sites and Golgi stacks is probably a general feature of cells that do not transport Golgi elements along cytoskeletal tracks. Consistent with this idea, microtubules have no influence on Golgi structure or positioning in P. pastoris (Figs. (Figs.11 and and4).4). However, in some cell types, nascent Golgi elements are transported away from tER sites, thereby obscuring the tER-Golgi connection. For example, in S. pombe, microtubules play a role in cisternal stacking and possibly in Golgi movement (Ayscough et al., 1993). In higher plants, Golgi structures are transported along actin filaments (Driouich and Staehelin, 1997; Boevink et al., 1998). The best-studied example of cytoskeleton-mediated Golgi movement is provided by vertebrate cells, which employ microtubules and associated motor proteins to generate a juxtanuclear Golgi ribbon (Lippincott-Schwartz, 1998; Burkhardt, 1998). As a consequence, tER sites and Golgi elements normally do not colocalize in vertebrate cells. Yet recent evidence suggests that nascent Golgi structures in vertebrate cells initially coalesce at tER sites (Presley et al., 1997; Scales et al., 1997; Rowe et al., 1998); in the presence of microtubule-depolymerizing agents, entire Golgi stacks are found next to tER sites (Cole et al., 1996; Storrie et al., 1998). Thus, when microtubules have been disrupted, the tER-Golgi system in a vertebrate cell resembles the tER-Golgi system in P. pastoris. It seems that in all eukaryotes, the Golgi can be viewed as a dynamic outgrowth of the tER.
Abbreviations used in this paper
DICdifferential interference contrast
GFPgreen fluorescent protein
HAhemagglutinin epitope
tERtransitional ER

Footnotes
Thanks for reagents and advice to Randy Schekman, Alex Franzusoff, Chris Kaiser, Akihiko Nakano, Vytas Bankatis, Suresh Subramani, Jim Cregg, Steve Gould, Sean Munro, Peter Walter, Gerry Waters, Tom Stevens, Jan Burkhardt, Charles Zuker, and Robert Freedman, and for help with microscopy to Bob Josephs, Yimei Chen, Sharon Parmet, Judith Austin, and Jim McIlvain. We are grateful to Adam Linstedt, Lelio Orci, and Hewson Swift for help with initial explorations of the P. pastoris system, and to Nava Segev, Vivek Malhotra, and Adam Hammond for critical reading of the manuscript.
O.W. Rossanese, J. Soderholm, and B.J. Bevis were supported by National Institutes of Health training grant 5-20942. E.K. Williamson operates the EM core facility funded by the University of Chicago Cancer Research Center. B.S. Glick was supported by National Science Foundation grant MCB-9604342, a Pilot and Feasibility Study Award from the Diabetes Research Foundation, a Basil O'Connor Starter Scholar Research Award (5-FY96-1138) from the March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation, a Young Investigator Award from the Cancer Research Foundation, an Institutional Research Grant from the American Cancer Society, and a grant from the Pew Charitable Trusts.
  • Acharya U, Mallabiabarrena A, Acharya JK, Malhotra V. Signaling via mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK1) is required for Golgi fragmentation during mitosis. Cell. 1998;92:183–192. [PubMed]
  • Antebi A, Fink GR. The yeast Ca2+-ATPase homologue, PMR1, is required for normal Golgi function and localizes in a novel Golgi-like distribution. Mol Biol Cell. 1992;3:633–654. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ayscough K, Hajibagheri NMA, Watson R, Warren G. Stacking of Golgi cisternae in Schizosaccharomyces pomberequires intact microtubules. J Cell Sci. 1993;106:1227–1237. [PubMed]
  • Bannykh SI, Balch WE. Membrane dynamics at the endoplasmic reticulum-Golgi interface. J Cell Biol. 1997;138:1–4. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Barlowe C, Schekman R. SEC12encodes a guanine-nucleotide-exchange factor essential for transport vesicle budding from the ER. Nature. 1993;365:347–349. [PubMed]
  • Barr FA, Puype M, Vandekerckhove J, Warren G. GRASP65, a protein involved in the stacking of Golgi cisternae. Cell. 1997;91:253–262. [PubMed]
  • Beams HW, Kessel RG. The Golgi apparatus: structure and function. Int Rev Cytol. 1968;23:209–276. [PubMed]
  • Bénédetti H, Raths S, Crusaz F, Riezman H. The END3gene encodes a protein that is required for the internalization step of endocytosis and for actin cytoskeleton organization in yeast. Mol Biol Cell. 1994;5:1023–1037. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Boevink P, Oparka K, Santa S, Cruz, Martin B, Betteridge A, Hawes C. Stacks on tracks: the plant Golgi apparatus traffics on an actin/ER network. Plant J. 1998;15:441–447. [PubMed]
  • Bonfanti L, Mironov AA, Jr, Martínez-Menárguez J, Martella O, Fusella A, Baldassarre M, Buccione R, Geuze HJ, Mironov AA, Luini A. Procollagen traverses the Golgi stack without leaving the lumen of cisternae: evidence for cisternal maturation. Cell. 1998;95:993–1003. [PubMed]
  • Bracker CE, Morré DJ, Grove SN. Structure, differentiation and multiplication of Golgi apparatus in fungal hyphae. Protoplasma. 1996;194:250–274.
  • Burkhardt JK. The role of microtubule-based motor proteins in maintaining the structure and function of the Golgi complex. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998;1404:113–126. [PubMed]
  • Chapman RE, Munro S. The functioning of the yeast Golgi apparatus requires an ER protein encoded by ANP1, a member of a new family of genes affecting the secretory pathway. EMBO (Eur Mol Biol Organ) J. 1994;13:4896–4907. [PubMed]
  • Chappell TG, Warren G. A galactosyltransferase from the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. . J Cell Biol. 1989;109:2693–2702. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Clamp JR, Hough L. The periodate oxidation of amino acids with reference to studies of glycoproteins. Biochem J. 1965;94:17–24. [PubMed]
  • Cluett EB, Brown WJ. Adhesion of Golgi cisternae by proteinaceous interactions: intercisternal bridges as putative adhesive structures. J Cell Sci. 1992;103:773–784. [PubMed]
  • Cole NB, Sciaky N, Marotta A, Song J, Lippincott-Schwartz J. Golgi dispersal during microtubule disruption: regeneration of Golgi stacks at peripheral endoplasmic reticulum exit sites. Mol Biol Cell. 1996;7:631–650. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Driouich, A., and L.A. Staehelin. 1997. The plant Golgi apparatus: structural organization and functional properties. In The Golgi Apparatus. E.G. Berger and J. Roth, editors. Birkhäuser, Basel, Switzerland. 275–301.
  • Dunphy WG, Rothman JE. Compartmental organization of the Golgi stack. Cell. 1985;42:13–21. [PubMed]
  • Farquhar MG. Progress in unraveling pathways of Golgi traffic. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1985;1:447–488. [PubMed]
  • Farquhar MG, Palade GE. The Golgi apparatus (complex)— (1954–1981)—from artifact to center stage. J Cell Biol. 1981;91:77s–103s. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Franzusoff A, Redding K, Crosby J, Fuller RS, Schekman R. Localization of components involved in protein transport and processing through the yeast Golgi apparatus. J Cell Biol. 1991;112:27–37. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Gaynor EC, Emr SD. COPI-independent anterograde transport: cargo-selective ER to Golgi protein transport in yeast COPI mutants. J Cell Biol. 1997;136:789–802. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Gaynor EC, te Heesen S, Graham TR, Aebi M, Emr SD. Signal-mediated retrieval of a membrane protein from the Golgi to the ER in yeast. J Cell Biol. 1994;127:653–665. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Glick BS. Cell biology: alternatives to baker's yeast. Curr Biol. 1996;6:1570–1572. [PubMed]
  • Glick BS, Malhotra V. The curious status of the Golgi apparatus. Cell. 1998;95:883–889. [PubMed]
  • Gould SJ, McCollum D, Spong AP, Heyman JA, Subramani S. Development of the yeast Pichia pastorisas a model organism for a genetic and molecular analysis of peroxisome assembly. Yeast. 1992;8:613–628. [PubMed]
  • Griffiths, G. 1993. Fine Structure Immunocytochemistry. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 459 pp.
  • Harris SL, Waters MG. Localization of a yeast early Golgi mannosyltransferase, Och1p, involves retrograde transport. J Cell Biol. 1996;132:985–998. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hell, S.W., and E.H.K. Stelzer. 1995. Lens aberrations in confocal fluorescence microscopy. In Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy. J.B. Pawley, editor. Plenum Publishing Corp., New York. 347–354.
  • Higgins, D.R., and J.M. Cregg. 1998. Pichia Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology. Vol. 103. J.M. Walker, editor. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. 270 pp.
  • Jacobs CW, Adams AEM, Szaniszlo PJ, Pringle JR. Functions of microtubules in the Saccharomyces cerevisiaecell cycle. J Cell Biol. 1988;107:1409–1426. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kaiser CA, Schekman R. Distinct sets of SECgenes govern transport vesicle formation and fusion early in the secretory pathway. Cell. 1990;61:723–733. [PubMed]
  • Kärgel E, Menzel R, Honeck H, Vogel F, Böhmer A, Schunck W-H. Candida maltosa NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase: cloning of a full-length cDNA, heterologous expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiaeand function of the N-terminal region for membrane anchoring and proliferation of the endoplasmic reticulum. Yeast. 1996;12:333–348. [PubMed]
  • Kreis TE. Role of microtubules in the organisation of the Golgi apparatus. Cell Motil Cytoskelet. 1990;15:67–70. [PubMed]
  • Kuehn MJ, Schekman R. COPII and secretory cargo capture into transport vesicles. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1997;9:477–483. [PubMed]
  • Kuge O, Dascher C, Orci L, Rowe T, Amherdt M, Plutner H, Ravazzola M, Tanigawa G, Rothman JE, Balch WE. Sar1 promotes vesicle budding from the endoplasmic reticulum but not Golgi compartments. J Cell Biol. 1994;125:51–65. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lacey, A.J. 1989. Light Microscopy in Biology. A Practical Approach. IRL Press, Oxford, UK. 329 pp.
  • Lew, D.J., T. Weinert, and J.R. Pringle. 1997. Cell cycle control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In The Molecular and Cellular Biology of the Yeast Saccharomyces. Vol. 3. J.R. Pringle, J.R. Broach, and E.W. Jones, editors. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY. 607–695.
  • Lippincott-Schwartz J. Cytoskeletal proteins and Golgi dynamics. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1998;10:52–59. [PubMed]
  • Love HD, Lin C-C, Short CS, Ostermann J. Isolation of functional Golgi-derived vesicles with a possible role in retrograde transport. J Cell Biol. 1998;140:541–551. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lupashin VV, Hamamoto S, Schekman RW. Biochemical requirements for the targeting and fusion of ER-derived transport vesicles with purified yeast Golgi membranes. J Cell Biol. 1996;132:277–289. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lussier M, Sdicu AM, Ketela T, Bussey H. Localization and targeting of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Kre2p/Mnt1p α1,2-mannosyltransferase to a medial-Golgi compartment. J Cell Biol. 1995;131:913–927. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Makarow M. Secretion of invertase in mitotic yeast cells. EMBO (Eur Mol Biol Organ) J. 1988;7:1475–1482. [PubMed]
  • Mironov AA, Weidman P, Luini A. Variations on the intracellular transport theme: maturing cisternae and trafficking tubules. J Cell Biol. 1997;138:481–484. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Mollenhauer HH, Morré DJ. Structural compartmentation of the cytosol: zones of exclusion, zones of adhesion, cytoskeletal and intercisternal elements. Subcell Biochem. 1978;5:327–359. [PubMed]
  • Mollenhauer HH, Morré DJ. Perspectives on Golgi apparatus form and function. J Electron Microsc Tech. 1991;17:2–14. [PubMed]
  • Morré DJ. The Golgi apparatus. Int Rev Cytol. 1987;17:211–253.
  • Nakanishi-Shindo Y, Nakayama K, Tanaka A, Toda Y, Jigami Y. Structure of the N-linked oligosaccharides that show the complete loss of α-1,6-polymannose outer chain from och1, och1 mnn1, and och1 mnn1 alg3 mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. . J Biol Chem. 1993;268:26338–26345. [PubMed]
  • Nakano A, Brada D, Schekman R. A membrane glycoprotein, Sec12p, required for protein transport from the endoplasmic reticulum to the Golgi apparatus in yeast. J Cell Biol. 1988;107:851–863. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Nakano A, Muramatsu M. A novel GTP-binding protein, Sar1p, is involved in transport from the endoplasmic reticulum to the Golgi apparatus. J Cell Biol. 1989;109:2677–2691. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Nakayama K, Nagasu T, Shimma Y, Kuromitsu J, Jigami Y. OCH1encodes a novel membrane bound mannosyltransferase: outer chain elongation of asparagine-linked oligosaccharides. EMBO (Eur Mol Biol Organ) J. 1992;11:2511–2519. [PubMed]
  • Nishikawa S, Nakano A. The GTP-binding Sar1 protein is localized to the early compartment of the yeast secretory pathway. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1991;1093:135–143. [PubMed]
  • Nishikawa S, Nakano A. Identification of a gene required for membrane protein retention in the early secretory pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:8179–8183. [PubMed]
  • Nishikawa S-I, Hirata A, Nakano A. Inhibition of endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-to-Golgi transport induces relocalization of binding protein (BiP) within the ER to form the BiP bodies. Mol Biol Cell. 1994;5:1129–1143. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Novick P, Field C, Schekman R. Identification of 23 complementation groups required for post-translational events in the yeast secretory pathway. Cell. 1980;21:205–215. [PubMed]
  • Orci L, Ravazzola M, Meda P, Holcomb C, Moore H-P, Hicke L, Schekman R. Mammalian Sec23p homologue is restricted to the endoplasmic reticulum transitional cytoplasm. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88:8611–8615. [PubMed]
  • Orlean, P. 1997. Biogenesis of yeast wall and surface components. In The Molecular and Cellular Biology of the Yeast Saccharomyces. Vol. 3. J.R. Pringle, J.R. Broach, and E.W. Jones, editors. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY. 229–362.
  • Paccaud J-P, Reith W, Carpentier J-L, Ravazzola M, Amherdt M, Schekman R, Orci L. Cloning and functional characterization of mammalian homologues of the COPII component Sec23. Mol Biol Cell. 1996;7:1535–1546. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Palade G. Intracellular aspects of the process of protein synthesis. Science. 1975;189:347–358. [PubMed]
  • Pelham HRB. Getting through the Golgi complex. Trends Cell Biol. 1998;8:45–49. [PubMed]
  • Presley JF, Cole NB, Schroer TA, Hirschberg K, Zaal KJM, Lippincott-Schwartz J. ER-to-Golgi transport visualized in living cells. Nature. 1997;389:81–85. [PubMed]
  • Preuss D, Mulholland J, Franzusoff A, Segev N, Botstein D. Characterization of the SaccharomycesGolgi complex through the cell cycle by immunoelectron microscopy. Mol Biol Cell. 1992;3:789–803. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Preuss D, Mulholland J, Kaiser CA, Orlean P, Albright C, Rose MD, Robbins PW, Botstein D. Structure of the yeast endoplasmic reticulum: localization of ER proteins using immunofluorescence and immunoelectron microscopy. Yeast. 1991;7:891–911. [PubMed]
  • Pringle JR, Adams AEM, Drubin DG, Haarer BK. Immunofluorescence methods for yeast. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:565–602. [PubMed]
  • Pryer NK, Salama NR, Schekman R, Kaiser CA. Cytosolic Sec13p complex is required for vesicle formation from the endoplasmic reticulum in vitro. J Cell Biol. 1993;120:865–875. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Rabouille, C., and G. Warren. 1997. Changes in the architecture of the Golgi apparatus during mitosis. In The Golgi Apparatus. E.G. Berger and J. Roth, editors. Birkhäuser, Basel, Switzerland. 195–217.
  • Rambourg A, Clermont Y, Képès F. Modulation of the Golgi apparatus in Saccharomyces cerevisiae sec7mutants as seen by three-dimensional electron microscopy. Anat Rec. 1993;237:441–452. [PubMed]
  • Rambourg A, Clermont Y, Nicaud JM, Gaillardin C, Kepes F. Transformations of membrane-bound organelles in sec14 mutants of the yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Yarrowia lipolytica. . Anat Rec. 1996;245:447–458. [PubMed]
  • Rambourg A, Clermont Y, Ovtracht L, Képès F. Three-dimensional structure of tubular networks, presumably Golgi in nature, in various yeast strains: a comparative study. Anat Rec. 1995;243:283–293. [PubMed]
  • Redding K, Holcomb C, Fuller RS. Immunolocalization of Kex2 protease identifies a putative late Golgi compartment in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. . J Cell Biol. 1991;113:527–538. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Rieder SE, Banta LM, Köhrer K, McCaffery JM, Emr SD. Multilamellar endosome-like compartment accumulates in the yeast vps28vacuolar protein sorting mutant. Mol Biol Cell. 1996;7:985–999. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Rose MD, Misra LM, Vogel JP. KAR2, a karyogamy gene, is the yeast homolog of the mammalian BiP/GRP78 gene. Cell. 1989;57:1211–1221. [PubMed]
  • Rothman JE, Wieland FT. Protein sorting by transport vesicles. Science. 1996;272:227–234. [PubMed]
  • Rothstein R. Targeting, disruption, replacement, and allele rescue: integrative DNA transformation in yeast. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:281–301. [PubMed]
  • Rowe T, Dascher C, Bannykh S, Plutner H, Balch WE. Role of vesicle-associated syntaxin 5 in the assembly of pre-Golgi intermediates. Science. 1998;279:696–700. [PubMed]
  • Scales SJ, Pepperkok R, Kreis TE. Visualization of ER-to-Golgi transport in living cells reveals a sequential mode of action for COPII and COPI. Cell. 1997;90:1137–1148. [PubMed]
  • Schnepf E. Golgi apparatus and slime secretion in plants: the early implications and recent models of membrane traffic. Protoplasma. 1993;172:3–11.
  • Sears IB, O'Connor J, Rossanese OW, Glick BS. A versatile set of vectors for constitutive and regulated gene expression in Pichia pastoris. . Yeast. 1998;14:783–790. [PubMed]
  • Segev N, Botstein D. The ras-like yeast YPT1gene is itself essential for growth, sporulation, and starvation response. Mol Cell Biol. 1987;7:2367–2377. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Segev N, Mulholland J, Botstein D. The yeast GTP-binding YPT1 protein and a mammalian counterpart are associated with the secretion machinery. Cell. 1988;52:915–924. [PubMed]
  • Shaywitz DA, Orci L, Ravazzola M, Swaroop A, Kaiser CA. Human SEC13Rp functions in yeast and is located on transport vesicles budding from the endoplasmic reticulum. J Cell Biol. 1995;128:769–777. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Sitia R, Meldolesi J. Endoplasmic reticulum: a dynamic patchwork of specialized subregions. Mol Biol Cell. 1992;3:1067–1072. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Staehelin LA, Moore I. The plant Golgi apparatus: structure, functional organization and trafficking mechanisms. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1995;46:261–288.
  • Stanley H, Botas J, Malhotra V. The mechanism of Golgi segregation during mitosis is cell type-specific. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:14467–14470. [PubMed]
  • Storrie B, White J, Röttger S, Stelzer EHK, Suganuma T, Nilsson T. Recycling of Golgi-resident glycosyltransferases through the ER reveals a novel pathway and provides an explanation for nocodazole-induced Golgi scattering. J Cell Biol. 1998;143:1505–1521. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Svodoba A, Necas O. Ultrastructure of Saccharomyces cerevisiaecells accumulating Golgi organelles. J Basic Microbiol. 1987;27:603–612. [PubMed]
  • Tang BL, Peter F, Krijnse-Locker J, Low S, Griffiths G, Hong W. The mammalian homolog of yeast Sec13p is enriched in the intermediate compartment and is essential for protein transport from the endoplasmic reticulum to the Golgi apparatus. Mol Cell Biol. 1997;17:256–266. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Thyberg J, Moskalewski S. Microtubules and the organization of the Golgi complex. Exp Cell Res. 1985;159:1–16. [PubMed]
  • Tokuyasu KT. Use of poly(vinylpyrrolidone) and poly(vinyl alcohol) for cryoultramicrotomy. Histochem J. 1989;21:163–171. [PubMed]
  • Trimble RB, Atkinson PH, Tschopp JF, Townsend RR, Maley F. Structure of oligosaccharides on Saccharomyces SUC2 invertase secreted by the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris. . J Biol Chem. 1991;266:22807–22817. [PubMed]
  • Waterham HR, Digan ME, Koutz PJ, Lair SV, Cregg JM. Isolation of the Pichia pastorisglyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene and characterization of its promoter. Gene. 1997;186:37–44. [PubMed]
  • Weiss, D.G., W. Maile, and R.A. Wick. 1989. Video microscopy. In Light Microscopy in Biology. A Practical Approach. A.J. Lacey, editor. IRL Press, Oxford, UK. 221–278.
  • Whaley, W.G. 1975. The Golgi Apparatus. Springer-Verlag, Vienna. 190 pp.
  • Wolf J, Nicks M, Deitz S, van Tuinen E, Franzusoff A. An N-end rule destabilization mutant reveals pre-Golgi requirements for Sec7p in yeast membrane traffic. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998;243:191–198. [PubMed]
  • Yanisch-Perron C, Vieira J, Messing J. Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors. Gene. 1985;33:103–119. [PubMed]
Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of
The Rockefeller University Press