PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jhyg
 
J Hyg (Lond). Dec 1984; 93(3): 505–529.
PMCID: PMC2129460
Infection and sepsis after operations for total hip or knee-joint replacement: influence of ultraclean air, prophylactic antibiotics and other factors.
O. M. Lidwell, E. J. Lowbury, W. Whyte, R. Blowers, S. J. Stanley, and D. Lowe
Abstract
Operating in ultraclean air and the prophylactic use of antibiotics have been found to reduce the incidence of joint sepsis confirmed at re-operation, after total hip or knee-joint replacement. The reduction was about 2-fold when operations were done in ultraclean air, 4.5-fold when body-exhaust suits also were worn, and about 3- to 4-fold when antibiotics had been given prophylactically. The effects of ultraclean air and antibiotics were additive. Wound sepsis recognized during post-operative hospital stay was, however, reduced by these measures only when it had been classed as major wound sepsis. This was reported after 2.3% of operations done without antibiotic cover in conventionally ventilated operating rooms. Joint sepsis was much more frequent after wound infection and especially after major wound sepsis, although most cases of joint sepsis were not preceded by recognized wound sepsis. This was particularly noticeable after major wound sepsis associated with Staphylococcus aureus; after 37 such infections the same species was subsequently found in the septic joint of 11 patients. The sources of wound colonization with Staph. aureus, when this was not followed by joint sepsis, appeared to differ widely from those where joint sepsis occurred later. Operating-room sources could be found for most of the latter and the risk of infection appeared to be similar with respect to any carrier in the operating room whether a member of the operating team or the patient. For wound colonization that was not followed by joint sepsis, operating-room sources could only be inferred for fewer than half and of these more than one half appeared to be related to strains carried by the patient at the time of operation. During the follow-up period, which averaged about 2 1/4 years with a maximum of four years, there were, in addition to the 86 instances of deep joint sepsis confirmed at re-operation, 85 instances in which sepsis in the joint was suspected during this period but was not confirmed, because re-operation on the joint was not done. The incidence of suspected joint sepsis was, like that of confirmed joint sepsis, less after operations done in ultraclean air: 1/2.5, or with prophylactic antibiotics, 1/2.3 Although re-operation was more frequent on the knee-joint than on the hip, and pain after the initial operation was more frequent after knee operations, there was no evidence that this was the result of any increased risk of infection.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Full text
Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (2.8M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page.
Articles from The Journal of Hygiene are provided here courtesy of
Cambridge University Press