PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jhyg
 
J Hyg (Lond). 1984 December; 93(3): 505–529.
PMCID: PMC2129460

Infection and sepsis after operations for total hip or knee-joint replacement: influence of ultraclean air, prophylactic antibiotics and other factors.

Abstract

Operating in ultraclean air and the prophylactic use of antibiotics have been found to reduce the incidence of joint sepsis confirmed at re-operation, after total hip or knee-joint replacement. The reduction was about 2-fold when operations were done in ultraclean air, 4.5-fold when body-exhaust suits also were worn, and about 3- to 4-fold when antibiotics had been given prophylactically. The effects of ultraclean air and antibiotics were additive. Wound sepsis recognized during post-operative hospital stay was, however, reduced by these measures only when it had been classed as major wound sepsis. This was reported after 2.3% of operations done without antibiotic cover in conventionally ventilated operating rooms. Joint sepsis was much more frequent after wound infection and especially after major wound sepsis, although most cases of joint sepsis were not preceded by recognized wound sepsis. This was particularly noticeable after major wound sepsis associated with Staphylococcus aureus; after 37 such infections the same species was subsequently found in the septic joint of 11 patients. The sources of wound colonization with Staph. aureus, when this was not followed by joint sepsis, appeared to differ widely from those where joint sepsis occurred later. Operating-room sources could be found for most of the latter and the risk of infection appeared to be similar with respect to any carrier in the operating room whether a member of the operating team or the patient. For wound colonization that was not followed by joint sepsis, operating-room sources could only be inferred for fewer than half and of these more than one half appeared to be related to strains carried by the patient at the time of operation. During the follow-up period, which averaged about 2 1/4 years with a maximum of four years, there were, in addition to the 86 instances of deep joint sepsis confirmed at re-operation, 85 instances in which sepsis in the joint was suspected during this period but was not confirmed, because re-operation on the joint was not done. The incidence of suspected joint sepsis was, like that of confirmed joint sepsis, less after operations done in ultraclean air: 1/2.5, or with prophylactic antibiotics, 1/2.3 Although re-operation was more frequent on the knee-joint than on the hip, and pain after the initial operation was more frequent after knee operations, there was no evidence that this was the result of any increased risk of infection.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (2.8M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Fitzgerald RH, Jr, Nolan DR, Ilstrup DM, Van Scoy RE, Washington JA, 2nd, Coventry MB. Deep wound sepsis following total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977 Oct;59(7):847–855. [PubMed]
  • Hill C, Flamant R, Mazas F, Evrard J. Prophylactic cefazolin versus placebo in total hip replacement. Report of a multicentre double-blind randomised trial. Lancet. 1981 Apr 11;1(8224):795–796. [PubMed]
  • Kamme C, Lindberg L. Aerobic and anaerobic bacteria in deep infections after total hip arthroplasty: differential diagnosis between infectious and non-infectious loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981 Jan-Feb;(154):201–207. [PubMed]
  • Lidgren L. Orthopaedic infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol. 1973;2(2):92–96. [PubMed]
  • Lidwell OM. The cost implications of clean air systems and antibiotic prophylaxis in operations for total joint replacement. Infect Control. 1984 Jan;5(1):36–37. [PubMed]
  • Lidwell OM, Lowbury EJ, Whyte W, Blowers R, Stanley SJ, Lowe D. Effect of ultraclean air in operating rooms on deep sepsis in the joint after total hip or knee replacement: a randomised study. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1982 Jul 3;285(6334):10–14. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lidwell OM, Lowbury EJ, Whyte W, Blowers R, Stanley SJ, Lowe D. Bacteria isolated from deep joint sepsis after operation for total hip or knee replacement and the sources of the infections with Staphylococcus aureus. J Hosp Infect. 1983 Mar;4(1):19–29. [PubMed]
  • Lidwell OM, Lowbury EJ, Whyte W, Blowers R, Stanley SJ, Lowe D. Airborne contamination of wounds in joint replacement operations: the relationship to sepsis rates. J Hosp Infect. 1983 Jun;4(2):111–131. [PubMed]
  • Lindberg L. Operationsboxar. En översikt över nya forskningsrön och praktiska resultat. Lakartidningen. 1979 Mar 21;76(12):1075–1078. [PubMed]
  • Poss R, Ewald FC, Thomas WH, Sledge CB. Complications of total hip-replacement arthorplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976 Dec;58(8):1130–1133. [PubMed]
  • Surin VV, Sundholm K, Bäckman L. Infection after total hip replacement. With special reference to a discharge from the wound. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1983 Aug;65(4):412–418. [PubMed]
  • Trexler PC. An isolator system for the maintenance of aseptic environments. Lancet. 1973 Jan 13;1(7794):91–93. [PubMed]
  • Whyte W, Hodgson R, Tinkler J, Graham J. The isolation of bacteria of low pathogenicity from faulty orthopaedic implants. J Hosp Infect. 1981 Sep;2(3):219–230. [PubMed]

Articles from The Journal of Hygiene are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press