|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
The VHL tumor suppressor protein (pVHL) is part of an E3 ubiquitin ligase that targets HIF for destruction. pVHL-defective renal carcinoma cells exhibit increased NF-κB activity but the mechanism is unclear. NF-κB affects tumorigenesis and therapeutic resistance in some settings. We found that pVHL associates with the NF-κB agonist Card9 but does not target Card9 for destruction. Instead, pVHL serves as an adaptor that promotes the phosphorylation of the Card9 C-terminus by CK2. Elimination of these sites markedly enhanced Card9's ability to activate NF-κB in VHL+/+ cells and Card9 siRNA normalized NF-κB activity in VHL−/− cells and restored their sensitivity to cytokine-induced apoptosis. Furthermore, downregulation of Card9 in VHL−/− cancer cells reduced their tumorigenic potential. Therefore pVHL can serve as an adaptor for both an ubiquitin conjugating enzyme and for a kinase. The latter activity, which promotes Card9 phosphorylation, links pVHL to control of NF-κB activity and tumorigenesis.
Inactivation of the VHL tumor suppressor gene plays a role in the pathogenesis of clear cell renal carcinomas, hemangioblastomas, and pheochromocytomas (Kim and Kaelin, 2004). The best understood function of the VHL tumor suppressor protein (pVHL) relates to its role as the substrate recognition unit of an E3 ubiquitin ligase complex that targets the alpha subunits of the heterodimeric transcription factor HIF (hypoxia-inducible factor) for destruction (Kaelin, 2007; Schofield and Ratcliffe, 2004). The interaction between pVHL and HIFα requires that HIFα be hydroxylated on either of two prolyl residues by members of the EglN family (also called PHDs or HPHs), which are oxygen-dependent enzymes that have evolved to respond to changes in oxygen over a physiologically relevant range in an intracellular milieu (Kaelin, 2007; Schofield and Ratcliffe, 2004). Increased HIF activity as a result of VHL inactivation contributes to renal carcinoma growth and probably plays a role in the development of hemangioblastomas (Kondo et al., 2003; Kondo et al., 2002; Maranchie et al., 2002; Raval et al., 2005; Zimmer et al., 2004).
Several lines of evidence, however, suggest that pVHL has functions in addition to regulating HIF. First, there are genotype-phenotype correlations with respect to site-specific tumor risk among individuals who carry a mutant VHL allele in their germline (VHL disease) (Kaelin, 2002). For example, some VHL alleles cause familial pheochromocytoma without an increased risk of hemangioblastoma and renal cell carcinoma. The products of these alleles appear to be normal with respect to HIF regulation but instead are compromised with respect to another pVHL target, aPKC (Clifford et al., 2001; Hoffman et al., 2001; Lee et al., 2005). Increased aPKC activity protects pheochromocytoma cells from apoptosis after growth factor withdrawal (Lee et al., 2005). It is probable that the other genotype-phenotype correlations in VHL disease are likewise manifestations of the degree to which different pVHL functions are quantitatively or qualitatively altered.
Second, chronic HIF activation does not appear to be sufficient for tumor development. Individuals who are chronically hypoxemic, such as occurs with life at high altitude or with various medical conditions, develop secondary polycythemia because of HIF accumulation and increased production of HIF-responsive gene products such as Erythropoietin (Golde and Hocking, 1981). However, the risk of developing the tumors seen in VHL disease is not conspicuously increased in these individuals. Similarly, individuals who are homozygous for a VHL allele that is hypomorphic with respect to HIF, or who carry a defective EglN1 allele, develop polycythemia but are not remarkably tumor prone (Gordeuk et al., 2004; Percy et al., 2006). Tumors are also not, so far, a feature of mice engineered to produce stabilized versions of HIFα (Kim et al., 2006)(WYK and WGK-unpublished data). These mice instead develop increased angiogenesis and, in some cases, polycythemia.
Finally, pVHL has been reported to bind to a dozen different proteins, has been found in multiple cellular compartments, and has been implicated in diverse cellular processes including cell division, apoptosis, differentiation, and control of extracellular matrix formation (Czyzyk-Krzeska and Meller, 2004; Kaelin, 2007). While some of these biological functions might relate to HIF, others, based on genetic experiments in human cells and model organisms, involve HIF-independent pVHL functions (Bishop et al., 2004; Calzada et al., 2006).
Clear cell renal carcinoma is the most common form of kidney cancer. Most of these tumors harbor biallelic VHL mutations or fail to produce VHL mRNA due to VHL promoter hypermethylation (Kim and Kaelin, 2004). Kidney cancers are difficult to treat medically and frequently exhibit increased NF-κB activity, which can promote resistance to chemotherapy or cytokines. Several studies have reported increased NF-κB activity in pVHL-defective renal carcinoma cells but how pVHL loss promotes NF-κB activity is unclear (An et al., 2005; An and Rettig, 2005; Oya et al., 2001; Oya et al., 2003; Qi and Ohh, 2003). Here we report that pVHL, bound to Casein Kinase 2, promotes the inhibitory phosphorylation of the NF-κB agonist Card9. Failure to phosphorylate Card9, which is known to interact with Bcl10 upstream of NF-κB (Bertin et al., 2000; Gross et al., 2006), leads to increased NF-κB activity and decreased apoptosis. Elimination of Card9 in pVHL-defective cells normalized NF-κB activity and restored sensitivity to a proapoptotic cytokine. Downregulation of Card9 in VHL−/− cancer cells retarded tumor growth. Therefore Card9 links pVHL to NF-κB biology and control of tumor growth.
To search for additional pVHL substrates we purified pVHL-associated proteins from PC12 pheochromocytoma cells that were engineered to produce HA-pVHL and treated with the proteasomal inhibitor MG132 (Figure 1A). Cell extracts were first fractionated by FPLC using a DEAE column. Fractions that were enriched for pVHL and the known pVHL substrate HIF1α, as determined by pVHL far western blotting (Figure 1B), were pooled, concentrated by ammonium sulfate precipitation, and subjected to alternating positive and negative affinity purification steps using anti-HA, control, and anti-pVHL antibodies. After the last step bound proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by mass-spectrometry. Among the peptides identified, eight peptides from the NF-κB agonist Card9 were recovered (Figure 1C). Since we isolated multiple Card9 peptides and VHL-deficient cells display increased NF-κB activity (An et al., 2005; An and Rettig, 2005; Qi and Ohh, 2003), we pursued the interaction of pVHL with Card9 further.
In vitro translated Myc-Card9 bound to bacterially produced GST-pVHL (complexed with elongin B and elongin C) in vitro (Figure 1D). This interaction was specifically blocked by a hydroxylated HIF1α peptide that docks with the pVHL β-domain (Figure 1D) (Hon et al., 2002; Min et al., 2002), suggesting that the pVHL β-domain is also important for binding to Card9. HA-pVHL and Myc-Card9 also bound to one another in cotransfection assays with HeLa cells (Figure 1E). Interestingly, Myc-Card9 migrated as a doublet in these assays and the lower (or ‘bottom’) band consistently displayed a higher affinity for HA-pVHL than the upper (or ‘top’) band. Consistent with the peptide competition assays, mutational analysis revealed that pVHL beta domain residues 92−121, which are critical for recognition of hydroxylated HIF1α, contribute to Card9 binding (Figure 1F). To ask if pVHL can bind to Card9 under endogenous conditions, U937 VHL+/+ leukemia cells were metabolically labeled with 35S and immunoprecipitated with control, anti-pVHL, or anti-Card9 antibodies. After extensive washing the bound proteins were eluted by boiling in SDS and, after dilution of the SDS, reimmunoprecipitated with the same or a different antibody. The initial anti-pVHL immunoprecipitate contained a protein doublet of the expected molecular weight for Card9 that was recognized by an anti-Card9 antibody, but not a control antibody, in the second immunoprecipitation. Moreover, this doublet comigrated with the doublet captured when proteins released from the initial anti-Card9 immunoprecipitation reaction were reimmunoprecipitated with the same anti-Card9 antibody under denaturing conditions (Figure 1G and data not shown). This suggests that pVHL can interact with Card9 under physiological conditions. Note that Fig 1G cannot be directly compared to Fig 1E because different electrophoretic conditions were used (15% vs. 10% polyacrylamide, respectively) and because Fig 1G, in contrast to Fig 1E, depicts only newly synthesized Card9.
In pilot experiments we determined that Card9 abundance was not altered in VHL+/+ cells treated with proteasomal inhibitors or hydroxylase inhibitors, in contrast to the canonical pVHL substrate HIFα (data not shown). Instead, we noted that the Card9 top band was virtually absent in VHL−/− pRC3 cells (Figure 2A). Similar results were observed in isogenic A498 renal carcinoma cells that do or do not contain wild-type pVHL (Figure S1). WT8 cells and pRC3 cells are 786-O VHL−/− renal carcinoma cell subclones that were stably transfected with a plasmid encoding wild-type pVHL or with the backbone vector, respectively (Iliopoulos et al., 1995). The top band and bottom band isolated from cells that contain wild-type pVHL (Hep3B and WT8) collapsed into a faster migrating form when phosphatase treated, suggesting that pVHL promotes the (hyper)phosphorylation of Card9 (Figure 2B).
To pursue this idea further, we transiently transfected cells that do or do not contain wild-type pVHL with a plasmid encoding Myc-Card9. Under these experimental conditions only the top band was detected in cells containing wild-type pVHL (WT8 and HeLa cells) while both the top and bottom bands were detected in the VHL−/− pRC3 cells (Figure 2C). The appearance of an exogenous top band of Card9 in VHL−/− cells, in contrast to the behavior of endogenous Card9, might be due to the higher concentrations of Card9 achieved after transient transfection. For example, these conditions might promote the interaction of Card9 with the relevant kinase(s) and hence partially obviate the need for an adaptor (see below). Nonetheless, the Card9 bottom band reappeared in HeLa cells producing Myc-tagged Card9 and treated with VHL siRNA (Figure 2C and Figure S2). Conversely, incubation of dephosphorylated Myc-Card9 with a pVHL-containing cell extract led to the appearance of the top band in vitro, which disappeared upon lambda phosphatase treatment (Figure 2D).
These results indicated that pVHL promotes Card9 phosphorylation. In parallel we discovered that pVHL associates with a kinase that can phosphorylate Card9 in vitro (Figure 3A). pVHL was recently reported to be a CK2 substrate (Lolkema et al., 2005). We independently discovered that pVHL is a CK2 substrate (data not shown), which led us to ask if CK2 binds to pVHL. We found that CK2 and pVHL can be coimmunoprecipitated (Figure 3B), raising the possibility that pVHL acts as an adaptor to promote the phosphorylation of Card9 by CK2. In support of this, pVHL enhanced the binding of Card9 and CK2 in vivo (Figure 3C).
The Card9 C-terminus contains multiple serine and threonine residues that resemble CK2 phosphorylation sites. Mass spectrometry analysis of Myc-Card9 recovered from HeLa cells revealed that these sites, including T531 and T533, were phosphorylated in vivo (Figure S3). These sites were also phosphorylated by CK2 in vitro, as determined by mass spectrometry, which coincided with the appearance of the Card9 top band (Figure 3D). Conversely, the top band/bottom band ratio was markedly decreased in HeLa cells transfected to produce epitope-tagged Card9 and treated with siRNA directed against the CK2 catalytic (CK2α) or regulatory (CK2β) subunits (Figure 3E). In addition, the top band of endogenous Card9 in Hep3B cells was eliminated with the CK2 inhibitor TBB but not a Cdk inhibitor (Figure 3F).
To study this further, we generated a polyclonal antibody that recognizes a Card9 peptide phosphorylated on T531 and T533 (Figure S4A). This antibody preferentially recognized the Card9 top band and did not react with exogenous or endogenous Card9 following phosphatase treatment (Figure 3G and Figure S4B). Using this reagent, we confirmed that anti-pVHL immunoprecipitates direct the phosphorylation of these two residues in vitro (Figure 3H) and that this reaction is specifically inhibited by TBB (Figure S4C). Moreover, Card9 phosphorylation was diminished following somatic VHL inactivation in vivo (Figure 3I).
To decipher the functional relevance of Card9 phosphorylation by CK2 we created C-terminal Card9 truncation and missense mutants. In pilot experiments, we confirmed that Card9 is an NF-κB agonist (Figure 4A). Deletion of the Card9 C-terminus, and hence all of the Card9 C-terminal CK2 sites, eliminated the top band, as expected (Figure 4B). Moreover, deletion of the Card9 C-terminus markedly increased its ability to enhance NF-κB activity (Figure 4B) (note different y-axes in Figure 4A and Figure 4B). Elimination of 4 C-terminal CK2 sites within Card9, alone or in combination, by alanine substitutions also increased reporter activity and replacement of all 4 sites with alanines markedly decreased top band formation (Figure 4C). Likewise, the Card9 phosphosite mutants were more potent than wild-type Card9 with respect to the induction of the NF-κB target gene TNFα (Figure 4D) and NF-κB DNA-binding activity (Figure S5A). Consistent with this latter observation, NF-κB DNA-binding activity was also increased in cells treated with a CK2 inhibitor (Figure S5B). These results indicate that phosphorylation of the Card9 C-terminus impairs its ability to activate NF-κB.
In keeping with earlier studies (An et al., 2005; An and Rettig, 2005; Qi and Ohh, 2003), we observed that the activity of artificial and naturally occurring NF-κB responsive promoters was increased in VHL−/− renal carcinoma cells relative to their wild-type pVHL counterparts (Figure 5A and B). In keeping with this, the induction of the endogenous NF-κB targets TNFα and IκBα by the NF-κB agonist TNFα was much more pronounced in VHL−/− cells compared to their wild-type counterparts (Figure 5C and D). The changes in IκBα mRNA were mirrored by changes in the accumulation of IκBα protein (Figure S6), which again supports the earlier conclusion of others that endogenous NF-κB activity is enhanced in VHL−/− cells. Likewise, a number of NF-κB target genes were transcriptionally activated after conditional inactivation of VHL in VHL flox/flox mice (Haase et al., 2001) that ubiquitously express a Cre-ER fusion protein (Vooijs et al., 2001) (Table 1). These effects were seen in liver (Table 1) but not spleen (data not shown), suggesting that regulation of Card9 and NF-κB by pVHL is tissue-specific. Similarly, endogenous NF-kB targets were activated in livers of VHL flox/flox mice expressing Cre recombinase under the control of the Albumin promoter (Haase et al., 2001; Kim et al., 2006) (Figure S7).
The increased NF-κB activity observed in VHL−/− renal carcinoma cells is, at least partly, due to Card9 because it was effectively neutralized with several independent Card9 siRNAs/shRNA (Figure 5C-E and Figures S8 and S9). The behavior of the Card9 shRNA in these assays was similar to that of an siRNA directed against Bcl10, which together with its partner Card9, stimulates NF-κB activity (Figure S10). Similarly, VHL siRNA increased NF-κB activity in VHL+/+ Hep3B cells, which was partially blocked by coadministration of Card9 siRNA (Figure 5F). This suggests that Card9 acts downstream or parallel of pVHL and supports the idea that increased NF-κB activity in VHL−/− renal carcinoma cells reflects a failure to properly phosphorylate Card9.
We confirmed the recent finding that HIF2α, at least when artificially overproduced in some cell types, can also activate NF-κB (data not shown) (An and Rettig, 2005). This led us to ask whether NF-κB activation after pVHL loss was primarily due to Card9, HIFα, or both. 786-O cells produce HIF2α but not HIF1α (Maxwell et al., 1999). We identified 3 different HIF2α siRNAs that reduced HIF transcriptional activity in VHL−/− pRC3 cells to the levels seen in pVHL-proficient WT8 cells (Figure 6A and data not shown). These HIF2α siRNAs did not, however, diminish NF-κB activity (Figure 6B). ARNT1 is the major DNA-binding partner for HIFα. As expected, HIF transcriptional activity was markedly increased in ARNT1+/+ mouse hepatoma cells (Hoffman et al., 1991), but not in their ARNT1−/− counterparts, by VHL siRNA (Figure 6C). In stark contrast, however, NF-κB activation by VHL siRNA was ARNT1-independent (Figure 6D). Overproduction of a stabilized version of HIF2α (Kondo et al., 2003) in mouse hepatoma cells activated a HIF-responsive promoter (Figure 6E) but did not activate NF-κB, regardless of ARNT1 status (Figure 6F), which argues against the possibility that NF-κB activation by VHL siRNA in these cells reflects an ARNT1-independent function of HIF2α. Finally, we have not observed NF-κB activation in cells in which HIF is activated by hypoxia or hypoxia mimetics (data not shown). Collectively, these results suggest that pVHL inhibits NF-κB activity primarily by promoting the inhibitory phosphorylation of Card9 by CK2.
Enhanced NF-κB activity protects against TNFα–induced cell death (Beg and Baltimore, 1996; Van Antwerp et al., 1996; Wang et al., 1996) and VHL−/− renal carcinoma cells are relatively resistant to this cytokine (Caldwell et al., 2002). Stable downregulation of Card9 in VHL−/− renal carcinoma cells with a Card9 shRNA restored their sensitivity to the proapoptotic cytokine TNFα to levels seen in cells producing wild-type pVHL (Figure 7A). TNFα can, itself, induce NF-κB. In order to investigate basal levels of NF-κB, we blocked the induction with cycloheximide, as done by others before (Brummelkamp et al., 2003) (Wang et al., 1996). The effect of the Card9 shRNA was specifically due to Card9 downregulation because it was largely reversed by coexpression of a Card9 cDNA bearing silent mutations that destroy the shRNA recognition sequence without altering the Card9 protein sequence (Figure S11).
Next we performed orthotopic xenograft assays with VHL−/− kidney cancer cells expressing either a scrambled shRNA or Card9 shRNA. Downregulation of Card9 substantially decreased tumor growth (Figure 7B). The Card9 rescue cDNA described above nullified the effect of the Card9 shRNA, indicating that the observed suppression of tumor formation was due specifically to downregulation of Card9 and not an off-target effect (Figure 7C and D).
We found that pVHL associates with the NF-κB agonist Card9, which is reported to act in concert with Bcl10 upstream of NF-κB (Bertin et al., 2000; Gross et al., 2006). pVHL does not direct the destruction of Card9. Instead pVHL facilitates the phosphorylation of Card9 by CK2 on C-terminal residues that regulate Card9's ability to activate NF-κB. Card9 mutants lacking these phosphorylation sites are NF-κB superagonists while elimination of Card9 in VHL−/− renal carcinoma cells normalizes NF-κB activity and promotes apoptosis and suppresses tumorigenesis. In contrast, deregulation of HIF does not, based on our genetic experiments, appear to play a prominent role in promoting NF-κB activity when pVHL function is compromised.
Our biochemical studies suggest that pVHL, bound to CK2, brings CK2 into proximity with Card9 and thereby increases the local concentration of the substrate. Therefore pVHL can serve as an adaptor for a kinase, CK2, as well as for the ubiquitin conjugating machinery that directs the polyubiquitination of HIFα subunits (Figure 7E). Phosphorylation of the Card9 C-terminus by CK2 might promote an inhibitory intra or intermolecular interaction or prevent the binding of Card9 to an accessory protein required for its activity. In this regard, we have obtained preliminary data that Card9 can interact with NEMO (also called IKKγ)(data not shown), which might conceivably play a role here.
We observed decreased Card9 phosphorylation, and increased NF-κB activity, in mouse livers after VHL inactivation, indicating that regulation of Card9 and NF-κB by pVHL occurs under physiological conditions. To date the role of Card9 in NF-κB activation has been most clearly documented during the myeloid immune response to particular infections (Colonna, 2007). Clearly it will be important to determine the physiological and pathological signals that govern the interaction of pVHL and Card9.
VHL mutations play a causal role in renal carcinomas, which are notoriously resistant to chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and proapoptotic cytokines. Increased NF-κB activity, which has been documented in renal carcinomas before (Oya et al., 2001; Oya et al., 2003), is likely to play a role here (Karin et al., 2002; Nakanishi and Toi, 2005). Indeed, there is already preclinical evidence that suppression of NF-κB in renal carcinomas with interferon alpha, which is widely used in the treatment of this disease, can increase their sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents or other cytokines (Bukowski, 2000; Steiner et al., 2001). Further elucidation of Card9 regulation and function might reveal additional opportunities to manipulate NF-κB activity in tumor cells.
All renal carcinoma-associated missense VHL mutants are defective for the regulation of HIF but some preserve the ability to regulate Card9 (data not shown). This is consistent with HIF playing a dominant role in VHL−/− renal tumors. Nonetheless, many of the VHL mutations found in renal carcinomas are deletion, truncation, or nonsense mutations that would predictably eliminate pVHL function (Gnarra et al., 1996). Our data suggests that, in this setting, deregulation of Card9 would confer a more aggressive phenotype and resistance to therapy.
A number of HIF-responsive genes implicated in renal carcinogenesis, including VEGF, cyclin D1, and MMP2/9, are also NF-κB targets, suggesting that HIF and NF-κB might act cooperatively (Karin et al., 2002; Nakanishi and Toi, 2005). Agents that inhibit HIF-responsive growth factors such as VEGF have demonstrated activity in kidney cancer clinical trials (Kim and Kaelin, 2004) and might now be rationally combined with agents that modulate NF-κB function.
PC12 cells stably transfected to produce human HA-VHL (generated by Michael Hoffman) were incubated overnight with 10μM MG132 and lysed in EBC buffer (50mM Tris·HCl, [pH8.0], 120mM NaCl, 0.5% Nonidet [NP]-40). Approximately 1 gm of clarified cell extract was resolved by FPLC using a DEAE sepharose column (Amersham-Pharmacia). Aliquots of column fractions were farwestern blotted with recombinant pVHL, elongin B, elongin C complexes as described before (Yang et al., 2004). Fractions enriched for pVHL and HIF1α were pooled, precipitated with 60% ammonium sulfate (final conc.), resolubilized in ~ 1 ml of EBC, and dialyzed overnight against EBC to remove excess salt prior to immunoprecipitation with ~50 μl of protein A sepharose crosslinked to 12CA5 (~1 μg/μl) for ~5 hours at 4 °C. After 3 washes with NETN (20mM Tris·HCl, [pH8.0], 100mM NaCl, 1mM EDTA, 0.5% NP-40) the bound proteins were eluted with 1 μg/μl HA peptide in PBS buffer. The eluate (total volume ~ 600 μl) was then precleared by incubation with ~ 30 μl sepharose cross-linked to control antibody for ~5 hours at 4 °C. The supernatant was then immunoprecipitated with anti-VHL antibody (IG32) sepharose for ~5 hours at 4 °C. Bound proteins were eluted by boiling in SDS, resolved by SDS-PAGE, and analyzed by Mass spectrometry at Taplin Mass Spectrometry Center at Harvard Medical School.
Monoclonal anti-HA antibodies (12CA5 and cross-linked 3F10) were from Roche Applied Science. Anti-Myc antibodies (9B11, 9E10) were from Cell Signaling Technology and Zymed respectively. Monoclonal anti-pVHL (IG32) was described before (Kibel et al., 1995). For preparative immunoprecipitation of HA-pVHL complexes 12CA5, 9E10, IG32 were crosslinked to Protein A sepharose (Amersham Pharmacia) using dimethyl pimelimidate (Sigma). Polyclonal Anti-Card9 antibody was from Prosci. Polyclonal anti-CK2α antibodies (BL753, BL754) were from Bethyl Laboratories. Monoclonal anti-CK2β(6D5) and polyclonal anti-HA (Y11) were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Monoclonal anti-Card9 (TJ24) was made by the DFCI antibody core facility using mice that were immunized with GST-Card9 (1−200). Polyclonal antibodies recognizing T531T533 Card9 phosphopeptide (524−536) was made by Bethyl Laboratories.
A full length Card9 cDNA clone (NM_052813) was purchased from Origene. The open reading frame was PCR amplified with primers that introduced a 5'BamHI site and 3'EcoRI site to facilitate subcloning into a pcDNA3 plasmid (Invitrogen) that introduced an N-terminal Myc-epitope tag. Truncation and point mutants were made similarly using PCR primers that introduced the desired mutations. All Card9 plasmids were confirmed by DNA sequencing. Plasmids encoding LMP1 and DN-IκBα were gifts from Eliott Kieff and Ballad Dean, respectively. pcDNA3-HIF2α P405A; P531A was described before (Kondo et al., 2003).
Card9 was immunoprecipitated from EBC cell extracts using polyclonal anti-Card9 (endogenous) or anti-Myc (exogenous) antibodies. Immunoprecipitates were washed 3 times with NETN and once with lambda phosphatase or alkaline phosphatase buffer (provided by the manufacturer). The residual wash buffer was aspirated and the sepharose was resuspended in 100 μl of lambda or alkaline phosphatase buffer containing 400 units or 40 units of the corresponding enzymes. After 1 hour incubation at 30 °C the sepharose was washed once with NETN and bound Card9 was eluted by boiling in SDS-containing sample buffer. Alternatively, the sepharose was washed once with CK2 kinase buffer (20mM Hepes·NaOH, [pH7.9], 20mM MgCl2, 150mM NaCl) and the bound Card9 used as a substrate for in vitro kinase assays (see below). To prepare soluble, dephosphorylated, Myc-Card9, the above procedure was performed using a Catch and Release kit (Upstate Biotechnology) to immunoprecipitate Myc-Card9 and lambda phosphatase. Dephosphorylated Myc-Card9 was eluted according to the manufacturer's instructions.
TPA, recombinant CK2, CK2 inhibitor 4, 5, 6, 7-Tetrabromobenzotriazole (TBB), and 3-Amino-1H-pyrazolo[3.4-b]quinoxaline were from EMD-Calbiochem. Alkaline and Lambda phosphatase was from New England Biolabs. TNFα was from R&D Systems.
Cells grown in six-well plates were transfected with 200 nM siRNA (except for CK2 siRNA used at 100 nM) using Lipofectamine2000 (for mixtures of plasmids and siRNA oligos) or Oligofectamine (for siRNA alone). SiRNAs were purchased from Dharmacon unless otherwise indicated. Sense strands were as follows: VHLC 5'GCCUGAGAAUUACAGGAGATT3', and VHLD 5'AGACCUGGAGCGGCUGACACTT3', Card9−03 5'CUACGUAAGGACUCCAAGATT3', Card9−06 5'GGAGAAGGAGAUGUUCGAGTT3' (Ambion), and Card9−07 5'GGACUCCAAGAUGUACAAGTT3' (Ambion). HIF2A01 5'GACAAGGUCUGCAAAGGGUTT3', HIF2A02 5'GGAGACGGAGGUGUUCUAUTT3', and HIF2A03 5'CAGCAUCUUUGAUAGCAGUTT3', Bcl10 5'GATGAAGTGCTGAAACTTAGA3'. SCR 5'GCGCGCUUUGUAGGAUUCGTT3' was used as control. siRNA oligos against CK2α (sc-29918) and CK2β (sc-29916) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Mouse VHL siRNA smart pool was purchased from Dharmacon (M-004916−00).
To detect endogenous complexes ~20 ml of U937 leukemic suspension cells (~2 × 107 cells) were starved in Cysteine and Methionine-free media for 1 hour and then labeled with 2mCi [35S] Methionine for four hours (0.2 mCi/ml). The cells were lysed in 3ml EBC buffer, split into 3 aliquots, and immunoprecipitated with control, pVHL or Card9 antibodies. The immunoprecipitates, bound to sepharose, were washed four times with NETN, eluted by boiling in 50 μl 2% SDS for 5 minutes, and transferred to a second tube to which was added 1 ml EBC buffer. Aliquots of the eluate were then reimmunoprecipitated with the indicated antibodies (Figure 1G).
~ 20 15cm plates of nearly confluent cells were washed once with PBS and resuspended in 10 ml cold hypotonic lysis buffer (HEB) (20mM Tris·HCl, [pH7.5], 5mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1mM dithiothreitol) by mechanical scraping. The cells were disrupted using a dounce homogenizer with the ‘B’ pestle for 30 to 40 strokes on ice. Crude extract was centrifuged twice (once at 10,000 × g for 10 minutes and then at 10,000 × g for 30 minutes) to remove cell debris and nuclei. Aliquots were flash frozen and stored at −80°C before use (~3−5 mg/ml as determined by Bradford Assay). 81μl of cell lysate and 9μl of 10X Energy Regenerating System (ERS, 20mM Tris·HCl, [pH7.5], 10mM ATP, 10mM magnesium acetate, 300mM creatine phosphate, 0.5mg/ml creating phosphokinase) was added to 20 μl of protein A sepharose preloaded with dephosphorylated Myc-Card9 (see above) and gently mixed on a platform shaker for two hours at 30°C (Figure 2D).
500 units recombinant E. coli CK2 (α2β2) was added to the 20 μl of protein A sepharose preloaded with dephosphorylated Myc-Card9 (see above) in 100μl CK2 kinase buffer with 4μM ATP and gently mixed on a platform shaker for mixed for two hours at 30°C (Figure 3D).
WT8 and pRC3 cells (~2 15cm plates each) were immunoprecipitated with 20μl anti-HA 3F10 beads. The sepharose was washed 3 times with NETN and once with CK2 buffer. The residual wash buffer was aspirated and the sepharose was resuspended in 74μl CK2 kinase buffer to which was added 4μM ATP and 4 μl of soluble, dephosphorylated, Myc-Card9 (see above). At various timepoints aliquots (sepharose and solution) were boiled and resolved by SDS-PAGE (Figure 3H).
Alternatively, HeLa cells were transfected with plasmids encoding HA-VHL and/or Myc-Card9, lysed in EBC buffer, and immunoprecipitated with 20μl anti-HA 3F10 beads. After 3 washes with NETN the residual wash buffer was aspirated and the sepharose was resuspended in 100μl CK2 kinase buffer containing 10μCi [32P] ATP. After 2 hour incubation at 30°C with gentle agitation bound proteins were eluted by incubation at 95°C in 1% SDS for 5 minutes. The eluates were collected, diluted 10-fold, split to two fresh tubes, and immunoprecipitated with anti-HA or anti-Myc. Phosphorylated proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and detected by autoradiography (Figure 3A).
Cells grown in six-well plates were transfected with an NF-κB firefly luciferase reporter plasmid [3X-κB-Luc (a gift from Elliot Kieff) or IL-6 promoter (a gift of BCCM/LMBP (Plaisance et al., 1997)) and a renilla luciferase control plasmid (pRL-CMV; Promega) using Lipofectamine2000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Twenty-four hours later firefly luciferase activity was measured using the Dual Luciferase Assay System and normalized to renilla luciferase activity. For experiments where siRNA was used the cells were split 1:2 24 hours after transfection and analyzed 24 hours later.
10,000 cells/well were plated in 96 well plates. The next day the cells were treated with 9 μg/ml cycloheximide together with increasing amounts (0, 0.37, 1.1, 3.3 ng/ml) of TNFα. Twenty hours later, the media was replaced with 100 μl 0.05% crystal violet in 20% Methanol. After a 20 minute incubation the plates were gently rinsed with water and allowed to air dry. The remaining dye was dissolved with 100 μl acetic acid:methanol (1:3) and measured based on absorbance at 590 nm.
Total RNA was isolated using RNeasy mini kit with on-column DNase digestion (Qiagen). First-strand cDNA was generated using StrataScript First-Stand Synthesis System (Statagene). Real-time PCR was performed in triplicate using QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR master mix (Qiagen) and the Mx3000P QPCR system (Stratagene). Primers for TNFα and Iκbα were purchased from Qiagen (Cat No. QT01079561 and QT00014266, respectively). All values were normalized to the level of Actin mRNA abundance.
Three week old mice of indicated genotypes were injected with 2 mg Tamoxifen intraperitoneally weekly for 3 weeks. RNA was extracted using Trizol and chloroform followed by RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen). 2 μg of RNA was used to generate the first strand cDNA using a SuperArray kit (SuperArray Bioscience), which was analyzed by real-time RT-PCR using the SuperArray's RT2 Profiler PCR Array Mouse NF-κB Signaling Pathway plates according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Mice were anesthetized with ketamine hydrochloride and Xyla-Ject. A 2 cm incision was made along the middle of the mouse. After the kidney was exposed, 2×106 viable cells were injected near the lower pole into the renal parenchyma. After both kidneys were injected, wounds were closed with absorbable suture or autoclip (Becton Dickinson) and subsequent renal tumors were monitored by palpation. The mice were sacrificed ~15 weeks after injection. Tumor mass was calculated by subtracting the mass of the normal kidneys from the mass of the injected kidneys. Results are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM).
For bioluminescent detection and quantification of cancer cells noninvasively, mice were given a single i.p. injection of a mixture of luciferin (50 mg/kg) ketamine (150 mg/kg) and xylazine (12 mg/kg) in sterile PBS buffer. Fifteen minutes later, mice were placed in a light-tight chamber equipped with a charge-coupled device IVIS imaging camera (Xenogen, Alameda, CA). Photons were collected for a period of 1–60 s, and images were obtained by using LIVING IMAGE 2.60.1 software (Xenogen) and quantified using IGOR Pro 4.09A image analysis software (WaveMatrics, Lake Oswego, OR). The total photons from the right were divided with the total photons from the left, and the number at week three was arbitrarily set as 1. The relative ratios of tumor mass at other time points were derived by dividing the calculated numbers with the above number at week three, and the results were presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM).
We thank Volker Haase for the VHL flox/flox mice and Eliot Kieff for NFkB reporter plasmids. Supported by grants from the NIH and the Murray Foundation. W.G.K. is an HHMI Investigator.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.