Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of jcellbiolHomeThe Rockefeller University PressEditorsContactInstructions for AuthorsThis issue
J Cell Biol. 1994 July 1; 126(1): 189–198.
PMCID: PMC2120099

Feedback control of the metaphase-anaphase transition in sea urchin zygotes: role of maloriented chromosomes


To help ensure the fidelity of chromosome transmission during mitosis, sea urchin zygotes have feedback control mechanisms for the metaphase- anaphase transition that monitor the assembly of spindle microtubules and the complete absence of proper chromosome attachment to the spindle. The way in which these feedback controls work has not been known. In this study we directly test the proposal that these controls operate by maloriented chromosomes producing a diffusible inhibitor of the metaphase-anaphase transition. We show that zygotes having 50% of their chromosomes (approximately 20) unattached or monoriented initiate anaphase at the same time as the controls, a time that is well within the maximum period these zygotes will spend in mitosis. In vivo observations of the unattached maternal chromosomes indicate that they are functionally within the sphere of influence of the molecular events that cause chromosome disjunction in the spindle. Although the unattached chromosomes disjoin (anaphase onset without chromosome movement) several minutes after spindle anaphase onset, their disjunction is correlated with the time of spindle anaphase onset, not the time their nucleus breaks down. This suggests that the molecular events that trigger chromosome disjunction originate in the central spindle and propagate outward. Our results show that the mechanisms for the feedback control of the metaphase-anaphase transition in sea urchin zygotes do not involve a diffusible inhibitor produced by maloriented chromosomes. Even though the feedback controls for the metaphase- anaphase transition may detect the complete absence of properly attached chromosomes, they are insensitive to unattached or mono- oriented chromosomes as long as some chromosomes are properly attached to the spindle.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.1M).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Bernat RL, Borisy GG, Rothfield NF, Earnshaw WC. Injection of anticentromere antibodies in interphase disrupts events required for chromosome movement at mitosis. J Cell Biol. 1990 Oct;111(4):1519–1533. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Earnshaw WC, Bernat RL, Cooke CA, Rothfield NF. Role of the centromere/kinetochore in cell cycle control. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1991;56:675–685. [PubMed]
  • Fuseler JW. Repetitive procurement of mature gametes from individual sea stars and sea urchins. J Cell Biol. 1973 Jun;57(3):879–881. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Gorbsky GJ, Ricketts WA. Differential expression of a phosphoepitope at the kinetochores of moving chromosomes. J Cell Biol. 1993 Sep;122(6):1311–1321. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hartwell LH, Weinert TA. Checkpoints: controls that ensure the order of cell cycle events. Science. 1989 Nov 3;246(4930):629–634. [PubMed]
  • Holloway SL, Glotzer M, King RW, Murray AW. Anaphase is initiated by proteolysis rather than by the inactivation of maturation-promoting factor. Cell. 1993 Jul 2;73(7):1393–1402. [PubMed]
  • Hoyt MA, Totis L, Roberts BT. S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function. Cell. 1991 Aug 9;66(3):507–517. [PubMed]
  • Hyman AA, Mitchison TJ. Two different microtubule-based motor activities with opposite polarities in kinetochores. Nature. 1991 May 16;351(6323):206–211. [PubMed]
  • Jordan MA, Toso RJ, Thrower D, Wilson L. Mechanism of mitotic block and inhibition of cell proliferation by taxol at low concentrations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Oct 15;90(20):9552–9556. [PubMed]
  • Leslie RJ. Chromosomes attain a metaphase position on half-spindles in the absence of an opposing spindle pole. J Cell Sci. 1992 Sep;103(Pt 1):125–130. [PubMed]
  • Li R, Murray AW. Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast. Cell. 1991 Aug 9;66(3):519–531. [PubMed]
  • McKim KS, Jang JK, Theurkauf WE, Hawley RS. Mechanical basis of meiotic metaphase arrest. Nature. 1993 Mar 25;362(6418):364–366. [PubMed]
  • Murray AW. Creative blocks: cell-cycle checkpoints and feedback controls. Nature. 1992 Oct 15;359(6396):599–604. [PubMed]
  • Nicklas RB, Arana P. Evolution and the meaning of metaphase. J Cell Sci. 1992 Aug;102(Pt 4):681–690. [PubMed]
  • Nicklas RB, Krawitz LE, Ward SC. Odd chromosome movement and inaccurate chromosome distribution in mitosis and meiosis after treatment with protein kinase inhibitors. J Cell Sci. 1993 Apr;104(Pt 4):961–973. [PubMed]
  • Nislow C, Sellitto C, Kuriyama R, McIntosh JR. A monoclonal antibody to a mitotic microtubule-associated protein blocks mitotic progression. J Cell Biol. 1990 Aug;111(2):511–522. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Nislow C, Lombillo VA, Kuriyama R, McIntosh JR. A plus-end-directed motor enzyme that moves antiparallel microtubules in vitro localizes to the interzone of mitotic spindles. Nature. 1992 Oct 8;359(6395):543–547. [PubMed]
  • Rieder CL, Palazzo RE. Colcemid and the mitotic cycle. J Cell Sci. 1992 Jul;102(Pt 3):387–392. [PubMed]
  • Skibbens RV, Skeen VP, Salmon ED. Directional instability of kinetochore motility during chromosome congression and segregation in mitotic newt lung cells: a push-pull mechanism. J Cell Biol. 1993 Aug;122(4):859–875. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Sluder G. Role of spindle microtubules in the control of cell cycle timing. J Cell Biol. 1979 Mar;80(3):674–691. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Sluder G, Begg DA. Control mechanisms of the cell cycle: role of the spatial arrangement of spindle components in the timing of mitotic events. J Cell Biol. 1983 Sep;97(3):877–886. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Sluder G, Rieder CL. Experimental separation of pronuclei in fertilized sea urchin eggs: chromosomes do not organize a spindle in the absence of centrosomes. J Cell Biol. 1985 Mar;100(3):897–903. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Sluder G, Miller FJ, Rieder CL. The reproduction of centrosomes: nuclear versus cytoplasmic controls. J Cell Biol. 1986 Nov;103(5):1873–1881. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Spencer F, Hieter P. Centromere DNA mutations induce a mitotic delay in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Oct 1;89(19):8908–8912. [PubMed]
  • Wendell KL, Wilson L, Jordan MA. Mitotic block in HeLa cells by vinblastine: ultrastructural changes in kinetochore-microtubule attachment and in centrosomes. J Cell Sci. 1993 Feb;104(Pt 2):261–274. [PubMed]
  • Wright BD, Terasaki M, Scholey JM. Roles of kinesin and kinesin-like proteins in sea urchin embryonic cell division: evaluation using antibody microinjection. J Cell Biol. 1993 Nov;123(3):681–689. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Yen TJ, Compton DA, Wise D, Zinkowski RP, Brinkley BR, Earnshaw WC, Cleveland DW. CENP-E, a novel human centromere-associated protein required for progression from metaphase to anaphase. EMBO J. 1991 May;10(5):1245–1254. [PubMed]
  • Yen TJ, Li G, Schaar BT, Szilak I, Cleveland DW. CENP-E is a putative kinetochore motor that accumulates just before mitosis. Nature. 1992 Oct 8;359(6395):536–539. [PubMed]
  • Zieve GW, Turnbull D, Mullins JM, McIntosh JR. Production of large numbers of mitotic mammalian cells by use of the reversible microtubule inhibitor nocodazole. Nocodazole accumulated mitotic cells. Exp Cell Res. 1980 Apr;126(2):397–405. [PubMed]
  • Zirkle RE. Ultraviolet-microbeam irradiation of newt-cell cytoplasm: spindle destruction, false anaphase, and delay of true anaphase. Radiat Res. 1970 Mar;41(3):516–537. [PubMed]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press