Until recently, it had been widely accepted that the chronic intestinal inflammation found in human CD patients, as well as in many animal models of IBD, was caused by IL-12–driven excessive CD4+ Th1 responses. However, the results presented in this paper clearly demonstrate that IL-23, but not IL-12, plays an essential role in the induction of chronic intestinal inflammation. Although the requirement for IL-23 in T cell–dependent colitis is consistent with previous findings on its ability to promote pathological T cell responses, the demonstration that it is also essential for typhlocolitis in Hh+ 129RAG−/− mice highlights a novel role for IL-23 in innate immune pathology in vivo.
Attenuation of intestinal inflammation by blockade or genetic ablation of IL-23 was accompanied by decreased production of many proinflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α, IFN-γ, MCP-1, IL-6, IL-1β, and KC, several of which have been implicated in the pathogenesis of IBD. As IL-23 is produced rapidly by DCs and macrophages after exposure to pathogen-derived molecules (
16,
32), the most straightforward interpretation of our data is that IL-23, produced in response to intestinal bacteria, triggers a proinflammatory cytokine cascade that, if left unchecked, can lead to the development of chronic intestinal inflammation. As IL-23R is also expressed by DCs and macrophage populations, it has been proposed that IL-23 secretion can drive an autocrine feedback loop that amplifies local expression of cytokines like IL-1β and TNF-α (
37), which in turn stimulate release of additional proinflammatory mediators by stromal, epithelial, and endothelial cells.
Our experiments also highlight some novel aspects of the regulation of IL-17 expression in intestinal inflammation in vivo. To date, IL-23 has been proposed to trigger IL-17 production through the induction/expansion of a novel subset of CD4
+ Th17 cells, which have been associated with autoimmune pathology (
12,
13,
18,
38). However, our analysis of
Hh+ 129RAG
−/− mice showed that, concomitant with the increased IL-23 expression, there was a striking increase in both IL-17 mRNA expression and protein release in inflamed intestine, indicating that IL-23 also induces the secretion of IL-17 by non–T cells in an inflammatory environment. FACS sorting revealed that several subpopulations of LPLs expressed high levels of IL-17, including granulocytes and monocytes. However, the accumulation of granulocytes and monocytes in the spleens of
Hh+ 129RAG
−/− mice did not correlate with an increase in splenic IL-17 expression, suggesting that additional local signals in the inflamed intestine are required. A previous study noted that neutrophils may produce IL-17 in response to LPS, suggesting that bacteria may provide one such signal (
39). Increased expression of IL-17 has been reported in the intestinal mucosa of IBD patients, and histological analysis suggested that both T cells and monocytes may act as sources of IL-17 in the inflamed gut (
40). The IL-17R is widely expressed, and IL-17 binding promotes stromal, endothelial, and epithelial cells to secrete proinflammatory mediators that recruit neutrophils to sites of inflammation (
41). Together with our previous finding that a prominent granulocytic infiltrate is characteristic of
H. hepaticus–induced innate typhlocolitis (
30), this supports a role for IL-17 in the induction of innate intestinal pathology and suggests that several cell types may contribute to IL-17 production in the gut.
A very recent study reported that the T cell–mediated colitis that develops in IL-10
−/− mice or in RAG
−/− recipients of IL-10
−/− CD4
+ T cells was also dependent on IL-23 (
42). Although this was associated with increased development of pathogenic Th17 cells, anti–IL-17 treatment had little impact on colitis and had to be combined with anti–IL-6 treatment to attenuate disease (
42). These results indicate that even though IL-23–driven Th17 responses may play an important role in colitis, they constitute one of several potential innate and adaptive immune mechanisms that can contribute to intestinal pathology. Support for this hypothesis was obtained in a parallel study (see Kullberg et al. [
43] on p.
2485 of this issue) that examined the role of IL-23 in two models of
H. hepaticus–triggered T cell–dependent colitis. Though again highlighting a critical role for IL-23, these studies additionally identified a pathogenic role for IFN-γ, indicating that Th1 and Th17 responses may synergize to elicit maximal pathology during bacterially induced colitis (
43). Similarly, in our T cell–mediated colitis model the correlation between IL-17 and intestinal inflammation was not completely straightforward. Although elevated levels of IL-17 were found in colon homogenates from colitic RAG
−/− and p35
−/−RAG
−/− recipients, disease severity correlated with high frequencies of IFN-γ–secreting T cells, whereas only low proportions of IL-17–secreting T cells were present. These results again suggest that both Th1 and Th17 cells contribute to IL-23–dependent colitis. In addition, our observations that small populations of IL-17–secreting T cells were present in both p40
−/−RAG
−/− and p19
−/−RAG
−/− recipients clearly indicate that neither IL-12 nor IL-23 is required for differentiation of IL-17–secreting T cells in vivo. These findings are in accord with those of a very recent study in which infection with the intestinal bacterial pathogen
Citrobacter rodentium elicited potent Th17 responses in both wild-type and p19
−/− mice (
21). However, despite mounting strong Th17 responses, p19
−/− mice had less colonic inflammation and failed to clear the
C. rodentium infection, indicating that IL-23–driven inflammatory responses were an integral component of the protective response (
21).
Interestingly, a study using the dextran sulfate sodium model of acute colitis reported that neutralization of IL-17 exacerbated intestinal inflammation, suggesting an inhibitory role for IL-17 in this disease (
44). Furthermore, in vitro experiments using intestinal epithelial cell monolayers suggested that IL-17 could enhance mucosal barrier function (
45). Several recent studies have clearly shown that TGF-β, in the presence of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, induces the differentiation of Th17 cells (
20–
22). Conversely, in the absence of inflammatory mediators, TGF-β promotes the development of Foxp3
+ T reg cells associated with suppression of inflammatory responses(
21,
22,
46–
49). These paradoxical observations illustrate the complexity of immune regulation in the intestine and indicate that understanding how interactions between pleiotropic factors such as IL-17 and TGF-β influence intestinal homeostasis presents an important future challenge.
As increasing scrutiny is given to the role of IL-23 in inflammatory responses, it is becoming apparent that it is a gross oversimplification to consider the IL-23–IL-17 and IL-12–IFN-γ pathways as two independent (and often mutually exclusive) axes of immune pathology. Instead, we favor the idea that IL-23 is a central conductor of a range of innate and adaptive inflammatory responses and that IL-23 itself may be regulated at several levels. Although bacterial stimuli may be a major inducer of IL-23 secretion, adaptive immune processes may also modulate its production. In support of this, we have recently observed that injection of agonistic anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody induces an IL-23–dependent acute inflammatory response in RAG
−/− mice that was accompanied by intestinal inflammation (
50). In contrast to most other models, anti-CD40–induced colitis was independent of the presence of a bacterial microflora (
50), indicating that there is an alternative route of IL-23 induction. The anti-CD40 treatment most likely mimicked strong T cell activation, characterized by marked up-regulation of CD40L that can then signal through CD40 on APCs. Thus, during sustained immune responses, activated T cells may provide a positive feedback loop for inducing further production of IL-23, thereby perpetuating inflammation. It would also seem important to have means of inhibiting IL-23 production and, because T reg cells and IL-10 have been implicated in down-modulation of innate and adaptive inflammatory responses, these seem obvious candidates. In fact, macrophages isolated from IL-10
−/− mice show elevated secretion of both IL-12 and IL-23 in response to bacterial stimuli (
51).
Another important observation in these studies was that even though IL-23 was essential for local tissue inflammation in the intestine, it was not required for systemic inflammatory responses. This was clearly shown in the T cell transfer model of disease in which, even though colitis was highly attenuated in p19
−/−RAG
−/− mice, there was no inhibition of splenomegaly or in development of inflammatory foci in the liver. This suggests that IL-23 may be especially important for inflammatory responses within peripheral tissues, which is consistent with previous experimental observations in models of autoimmune inflammation in the brain (
11) and joints (
13) and in inflammation induced by bacterial pathogens in the lung (
52) and intestine (
21). Together with our results, these studies are consistent with the hypothesis that the natural function of IL-23 in host defense may be in coordinating inflammatory responses against bacterial infection in peripheral tissues, but that dysregulated expression of IL-23 may promote harmful immune pathology in these sites. This is consistent with the expression profile of IL-23 in
Hh+ RAG
−/− mice, where up-regulated IL-23 was present only in the cecum and colon but not in peripheral lymphoid tissues. Our findings that splenomegaly and liver inflammation in
Hh+ RAG
−/− mice were also attenuated after treatment with anti-p19 may reflect the sequential activation of local and systemic inflammatory responses in this model. In this case, we postulate that disease follows an “outside-in” sequence by which infection with the bacteria triggers local inflammation in the intestine, resulting in increased host cytokines and bacterial proinflammatory molecules reaching the systemic circulation. These in turn feed the systemic cytokine cascade that drives splenomegaly and liver pathology; therefore, preventing the initial inflammation in the intestine also shuts down the downstream systemic sequelae. In contrast, the T cell transfer model may represent an “inside-out” sequence in which naive T cell reconstitution is followed by a rapid T cell expansion in systemic lymphoid tissues. In the absence of T reg cells, this expansion proceeds in a dysregulated manner, allowing the excessive accumulation of both autoaggressive T cells that can mediate systemic inflammatory responses as well as bacterially reactive T cells that mediate intestinal inflammation. In this case, although IL-23 deficiency prevents the bacterially reactive T cells from causing colitis, it does not inhibit systemic T cell expansion and associated inflammation.
One additional point to note is that even though IL-23 is clearly a central mediator of intestinal inflammation, there may be additional IL-23–independent inflammatory pathways that also contribute to disease. This hypothesis is supported by our findings that although highly attenuated, some mild inflammation persisted in the anti-p19–treated
Hh+ 129RAG
−/− mice, mainly in the cecum, where the highest levels of
H. hepaticus colonization occur (
30). This indicates that pathogenic bacteria can also activate alternative innate immune mechanisms that synergize with IL-23 to drive severe pathology. It is clear that excessive immune responses of almost any variety, Th1 cell, Th2 cell, or innate immunity, can mediate intestinal inflammation (
1,
2).
The increasing clinical use of biological therapies such as infliximab (anti–TNF-α) in human IBD illustrates the potential benefits that may be derived through molecular analysis of immune pathogenesis. However, the long-term effects of such therapies are still unknown and, given the essential role of TNF-α in host defense, concerns have been voiced over possible increased incidences of infections, such as
Mycobacteria, or tumors (
53). Although some encouraging results have been obtained in initial clinical trials of anti–IL-12p40 in CD (
9), the central role of IL-12 in resistance against many pathogenic infections (
54) suggests that long-term administration may similarly depress systemic immune function. Agents that target IL-23 may have the advantage of selectively decreasing local immune responses in afflicted tissues while sparing systemic immune protective mechanisms, a highly desirable property for efficient therapeutic agents for IBD.