PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jcellbiolHomeThe Rockefeller University PressEditorsContactInstructions for AuthorsThis issue
 
J Cell Biol. 1985 March 1; 100(3): 887–896.
PMCID: PMC2113511

Centriole number and the reproductive capacity of spindle poles

Abstract

The reproduction of spindle poles is a key event in the cell's preparation for mitosis. To gain further insight into how this process is controlled, we systematically characterized the ultrastructure of spindle poles whose reproductive capacity had been experimentally altered. In particular, we wanted to determine if the ability of a pole to reproduce before the next division is related to the number of centrioles it contains. We used mercaptoethanol to indirectly induce the formation of monopolar spindles in sea urchin eggs. We followed individually treated eggs in vivo with a polarizing microscope during the induction and development of monopolar spindles. We then fixed each egg at one of three predetermined key stages and serially semithick sectioned it for observation in a high-voltage electron microscope. We thus know the history of each egg before fixation and, from earlier studies, what that cell would have done had it not been fixed. We found that spindle poles that would have given rise to monopolar spindles at the next mitosis have only one centriole whereas spindle poles that would have formed bipolar spindles at the next division have two centrioles. By serially sectioning each egg, we were able to count all centrioles present. In the twelve cells examined, we found no cases of acentriolar spindle poles or centriole reduplication. Thus, the reproductive capacity of a spindle pole is linked to the number of centrioles it contains. Our experimental results also show, contrary to existing reports, that the daughter centriole of a centrosome can acquire pericentriolar material without first becoming a parent. Furthermore, our results demonstrate that the splitting apart of mother and daughter centrioles is an event that is distinct from, and not dependent on, centriole duplication.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (5.6M).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Brooks RF, Richmond FN. Microtubule-organizing centres during the cell cycle of 3T3 cells. J Cell Sci. 1983 May;61:231–245. [PubMed]
  • DIRKSEN ER. The presence of centrioles in artificially activated sea urchin eggs. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Oct;11:244–247. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Fulton C, Dingle AD. Basal bodies, but not centrioles, in Naegleria. J Cell Biol. 1971 Dec;51(3):826–836. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • HARRIS P. Some structural and functional aspects of the mitotic apparatus in sea urchin embryos. J Cell Biol. 1962 Sep;14:475–487. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Heidemann SR, Kirschner MW. Aster formation in eggs of Xenopus laevis. Induction by isolated basal bodies. J Cell Biol. 1975 Oct;67(1):105–117. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Heidemann SR, Sander G, Kirschner MW. Evidence for a functional role of RNA in centrioles. Cell. 1977 Mar;10(3):337–350. [PubMed]
  • Kallenbach RJ. Continuous hypertonic conditions activate and promote the formation of new centrioles within cytasters in sea urchin eggs. Cell Biol Int Rep. 1982 Nov;6(11):1025–1031. [PubMed]
  • Keryer G, Ris H, Borisy GG. Centriole distribution during tripolar mitosis in Chinese hamster ovary cells. J Cell Biol. 1984 Jun;98(6):2222–2229. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Maller J, Poccia D, Nishioka D, Kidd P, Gerhart J, Hartman H. Spindle formation and cleavage in Xenopus eggs injected with centriole-containing fractions from sperm. Exp Cell Res. 1976 May;99(2):285–294. [PubMed]
  • Miki-Noumura T. Studies on the de novo formation of centrioles: aster formation in the activated eggs of sea urchin. J Cell Sci. 1977 Apr;24:203–216. [PubMed]
  • Rieder CL. Ribonucleoprotein staining of centrioles and kinetochores in newt lung cell spindles. J Cell Biol. 1979 Jan;80(1):1–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Rieder CL. Thick and thin serial sectioning for the three-dimensional reconstruction of biological ultrastructure. Methods Cell Biol. 1981;22:215–249. [PubMed]
  • Rieder CL, Bowser SS. Factors which influence light microscopic visualization of biological material in sections prepared for electron microscopy. J Microsc. 1983 Oct;132(Pt 1):71–80. [PubMed]
  • Rieder CL, Nowogrodzki R. Intranuclear membranes and the formation of the first meiotic spindle in Xenos peckii (Acroschismus wheeleri) oocytes. J Cell Biol. 1983 Oct;97(4):1144–1155. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Robbins E, Jentzsch G, Micali A. The centriole cycle in synchronized HeLa cells. J Cell Biol. 1968 Feb;36(2):329–339. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Sluder G. Experimental manipulation of the amount of tubulin available for assembly into the spindle of dividing sea urchin eggs. J Cell Biol. 1976 Jul;70(1):75–85. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Sluder G, Begg DA. Control mechanisms of the cell cycle: role of the spatial arrangement of spindle components in the timing of mitotic events. J Cell Biol. 1983 Sep;97(3):877–886. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Snell WJ, Dentler WL, Haimo LT, Binder LI, Rosenbaum JL. Assembly of chick brain tubulin onto isolated basal bodies of Chlamydomonas reinhardi. Science. 1974 Jul 26;185(4148):357–360. [PubMed]
  • Vorobjev IA, Chentsov YuS Centrioles in the cell cycle. I. Epithelial cells. J Cell Biol. 1982 Jun;93(3):938–949. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press