Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of brjopthalBritish Journal of OphthalmologyVisit this articleSubmit a manuscriptReceive email alertsContact usBMJ
Br J Ophthalmol. 2007; 91(12): 1698–1703.
Published online 2006 July 19. doi:  10.1136/bjo.2006.094888
PMCID: PMC2095551

Topographical changes of biconvex objects during equatorial traction: an analogy for accommodation of the human lens



To assess and compare the changes in shape of encapsulated biconvex structures undergoing equatorial traction with those changes reported in the human lens during accommodation.


Equatorial traction was applied to several different biconvex structures: air, water, and gel filled mylar and rubber balloons and spherical vesicles. In the vesicles, traction was applied externally, using optical tweezers, or from within, by the assembly of encapsulated microtubules. The shape changes were recorded photographically and the change in central radius of curvature of water filled mylar balloons was quantified.


Whenever an outward equatorial force was applied to the long axis of long oval biconvex objects, where the minor to major axis ratio was [less-than-or-eq, slant]0.6, the central surfaces steepened and the peripheral surfaces flattened. Similar changes in the shape of the lens have been reported during human in vivo accommodation.


All biconvex structures that have been studied demonstrate similar shape changes in response to equatorial traction. This effect is independent of capsular thickness. The consistent observation of this physical change in the configuration of biconvex structures in response to outward equatorial force suggests that this may be a universal response of biconvex structures, also applicable to the human lens undergoing accommodation.

Keywords: lens shape, equatorial traction, accommodation

The mechanism of accommodation has been studied for over 400 years.1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16 Accommodation results from a change in the shape of the crystalline lens.1 The lens is an encapsulated biconvex object. This change in shape of the lens occurs as a result of the force of ciliary muscle contraction transmitted circumferentially to the equatorial capsular edge of the lens by the zonules.

The widely accepted Helmholtz theory2 states that during ciliary muscle contraction the tension on the zonules is reduced, allowing the lens to become rounder and to increase in central optical power. This theory was founded, in part, on an intuitive belief that the application of equatorial tension to the lens will flatten both its central and its peripheral surfaces.

As the lens is an encapsulated biconvex object, we tested this assumption by recording the cross sectional profiles of other encapsulated biconvex objects in response to equatorial tension.



Biconvex 9 inch mylar balloons with a wall thickness of 0.020 mm, and biconvex 8 inch rubber balloons, with wall thickness of 0.350 mm, were filled with either air, water, or gelatin. When filled, the balloons had a long oval profile,17 with minor and major axes of ~175 mm and ~100 mm, respectively. The elastic moduli of rubber and mylar are 4 MPa and 3 GPa, respectively.

Each balloon was placed horizontally on an optical bench so that its equatorial plane was parallel to the bench. A circular ring light was centred above the balloon. The surface of the rubber balloon was made reflective by applying mineral oil. The changes in the reflection of the ring light from the surface of the balloon were videographed while equatorial traction was manually applied in one meridian or in two orthogonal meridians.

Radius of curvature measurement

A positional reference, a 6.35 mm diameter circular self‐adhesive red paper dot was attached at the central pole of the upper surfaces of three water‐filled mylar balloons. A Klein keratoscope that had been modified by removing its central convex lens was positioned above the balloon and centred at the positional reference. The distance between the positional reference and the keratometer was measured with an electronic digital caliper.

Two horizontally mounted, electronically controllable micrometers were attached to the equator of the balloon, 180° apart. The keratometric images associated with 20 outward micrometer steps of 0.5 mm, followed by 20 inward steps of 0.5 mm, were digitally photographed and measured in pixels. From the known diameter of the image of the paper reference dot, the diameter of the reflection of the second keratometric ring was determined in millimetres. The magnification, m, of the reflection of the second ring was calculated for each 0.5 mm tractional step. Using the object distance, so, which was the distance between the keratoscope and the pole of the balloon, the image distance, si, was calculated using the following formula18:

si = −so × m

Then the central radius of curvature, r, was calculated from the mirror formula18:

equation image

Verification of the curvature measurement

Using the technique described above, the radii of six chrome alloy steel precision metric balls traceable to NIST were measured. Each ball incrementally increased in diameter in 1 mm steps from 25 mm to 30 mm, with a precision of ±0.0025 mm. Each ball was measured in the 90° and 180° meridians five independent times.


An external force was applied to giant unilamellar vesicles (~10 μm diameter) in one meridian using a laser tweezers. A microscope stage was translated to bring the edge of a vesicle into the laser spot, and then translated slowly and horizontally away from the spot to apply the equatorial traction. The other end of the equator of the vesicle was pinned to the microscope slide. This ensured that the vesicle was only able to move in one plane and could not rotate.19,20 In addition, an outward equatorial force was applied from within the vesicles in one meridian by the polymerisation of encapsulated microtubular fibres.19,20 The vesicle profiles in response to the internal and external forces were videographed.



Qualitative curvature change

Equatorial traction applied at one meridian or at four points spaced 90° apart resulted in central steepening and peripheral flatting of the surfaces of the mylar and rubber balloons, whether they were filled with air, water, or gelatin ((figsfigs 1 and 2).

figure bj94888.f1
Figure 1 (A) Air filled Mylar balloon. (B) A gel filled Mylar balloon at baseline. (C) During equatorial traction in one meridian
figure bj94888.f2
Figure 2 Reflection of the keratoscopic mires from the central surface of a water filled mylar balloon. The 6.35 mm red paper dot attached to the central surface of the balloon served as a positional reference. (A) Before equatorial traction. ...

Validation of curvature measurements

The mean difference between the measured radii and the actual radii of curvatures of the precision steel balls was 0.2 mm ±0.3 mm. Therefore, the accuracy of the measuring technique21 for the radius of curvature of the balloons was better than 1.0 mm (fig 33).

figure bj94888.f3
Figure 3 A Bland–Altman plot21 of the difference between the measured radius and the actual radius of the precision balls.

Quantitative curvature change

For each 1% increase in equatorial diameter of the water filled mylar balloon, the radius of curvature decreased by 2 mm in the meridian of traction (fig 44).). When equatorial traction was decreased, the radius of curvature increased in that meridian. The change in the radius of curvature in response to equatorial traction demonstrated hysteresis with full recovery to the baseline curvature (fig 44)

figure bj94888.f4
Figure 4 A graph of the mean change in the central radius of curvature of the water filled mylar balloons in the meridian of increasing (solid line) and decreasing (dashed line) equatorial traction applied in the 180° meridian. Error bars ...


In response to an outward equatorial force, applied either externally by the laser tweezers or from within by polymerisation of the microtubular fibres, the vesicle changed shape in three distinct phases ((figsfigs 5 and 66).

figure bj94888.f5
Figure 5 Vesicle profiles during an outwardly increasing equatorial force applied from within the vesicles by microtubule polymerisation. (A) Demonstrates an oval profile. (B) Demonstrates further elongation of the vesicle in the axis of force ...
figure bj94888.f6
Figure 6 Vesicle profiles during application of an outwardly increasing equatorial force applied externally by optical tweezers. (A) Demonstrates an oval profile. (B) Demonstrates further elongation of the vesicle in the axis of force resulting ...

First, the vesicle's profile became oval, with a decrease in central thickness and flattening of its central and peripheral surfaces. With further force, and a significant increase in its equatorial diameter, the vesicle's profile changed from oval to a long oval—that is, it had a minor to major axis ratio of [less-than-or-eq, slant]0.6. From this second phase, only a small additional increase in force, reflected by a small increase in the vesicle's equatorial diameter, caused it to go into the third phase, where its central thickness increased, its central surfaces steepened, and its peripheral surfaces flattened ((figsfigs 5 and 66).


Positional references

Stability in shape, size, and position of the fixed reference dot relative to the camera is needed to control for any artefactual balloon movement during traction. Without this information about the stability of these reference dot parameters, changes in the mires due to movement of the balloon relative to the keratometer could be misinterpreted to reflect surface changes in the balloon.

The reference dot remained spherical in shape, unchanged in size, and stable in position in the 180° meridian during traction (fig 22).). This indicates that the observed surface contour changes in the mires in the 180° meridian are real and not induced by positional balloon movements during traction.

There is evidence in the 90° meridian of a downward displacement in the positional reference dot during traction (fig 22).). This downward movement, of approximately 0.5 mm, identifies tilting of the balloon during traction. This evidence of torsion in the 90° meridian confounds any interpretation of keratometric observations in the 90° meridian. Only the observations in the 180° meridian, which was stable, can be interpreted quantitatively with confidence.

Surface curvature change

An outward equatorial force applied to biconvex objects with a long oval profile results in central steepening and peripheral flattening. Similar shape changes occur to the profiles of air, water, and gel filled balloons and vesicles ((figsfigs 1, 2, 55,, and 6). Equatorial traction was applied by astronaut Kerwin in 1973 to a freely floating 6 cubic inch drop of water in the microgravity environment of the SkyLab (NASA).22 The central steeping and peripheral flattening of the water drop, a non‐encapsulated object, are evident (fig 77).

figure bj94888.f7
Figure 7 Changes in shape of a freely floating 6 cubic inch drop of water in the microgravity environment of the SKYLAB in response to manual application of equatorial traction. (A) Demonstrates the baseline circular water drop profile. (B) Demonstrates ...

Flattening of the central surface in response to equatorial traction only occurs when the object is initially spherical or oval. Once the object has a long oval profile,17 similar to the profile of the human crystalline lens, additional equatorial traction inducing only a small increase in equatorial diameter results in central steepening and peripheral flattening. Whether the object has a thick or a thin capsule, a smooth capsule like the vesicles, or a capsule with wrinkles near its equator, like the balloons, these changes in shape are independent of the elastic modulus of the capsule or the compressibility of the enclosed material. These changes occurred with rubber and Mylar balloons, whether they were filled with water or gel, which is negligibly compressible, or with air, which is 15 000 times more compressible.

Human crystalline lens accommodation

Central steepening and peripheral lenticular surface flattening is associated with human in vivo accommodation and has been observed when zonular traction is applied to fresh physiologically preserved postmortem intact human lenses.23,24,25 These surface changes have been demonstrated during human in vivo accommodation by each of the following: the change in position and size of reflections from the centre and peripheral anterior surface of the lens3,4; the change in the radius of curvature of the anterior lenticular surface with Scheimpflug photography26 and high speed optical coherent tomography27; and the negative shift in spherical aberration.1,28,29,30

The lens

Capsular thickness

The lens capsule is a smooth elastic membrane and is thinner at the centre of the lens and thicker at the periphery.4 It is, however, reasonable to simulate the lens with an object that has a capsule with uniform thickness. Mathematical modelling has demonstrated that, although the response to zonular traction is enhanced by the thickness variation of the lens capsule, the same qualitative lenticular shape changes occur if the lens capsule had uniform thickness.31 Furthermore, it has been shown that there is no significant difference in capsular thickness between humans, primates, and rabbits even though they have significantly different accommodative amplitudes.32

Material properties

It is reasonable to simulate the young lens stroma with a uniform material such as water or a gel. The lens, like other biological tissues, is negligibly compressible.33,34,35,36,37,38 In the young lens the material properties of the cortex and nucleus, including its optical density, are essentially the same.38,39,40 The lens fibres are tightly packed without extracellular space.41 The shear modulus of the young lens is very low39 and the strength of the attachment of the lens fibres to the capsule is also very weak.42 There is no cement substance or other extracellular material between the capsule and cortical cells. There are few interlocking processes between the first eight to 10 layers of cortical cells that are under the capsule.41 The cortical fibres are easily hydrodissected from the lens capsule and the lens nucleus.42,43,44 Consequently, the effect of interlens fibre attachments and lens sutures on the lenticular response to zonular traction is probably negligible.

Surrounding environment

The negligible compressibility of the lens results in the absence of any effect of intraocular pressure on lenticular accommodation. Experimentally, a change in intraocular pressure of up to 6 mm Hg did not alter human accommodative amplitude.45 Consequently, the modelling of lenticular in vivo accommodation does not require that the simulating object be placed in a specialised surrounding fluid or pressure chamber.

Location of tractional force

Traction was applied to the biconvex objects only at their equatorial edge. The zonules are attached anterior and posterior to the equatorial edge of the lens capsule. Finite element analysis has shown that equatorial traction applied to only the equatorial edge of the lens capsule is sufficient to simulate accommodation.46,47,48


Capsular thickness variation

In an attempt to explain the negative shift in spherical aberration that occurs during accommodation, Fincham4 postulated that the thicker peripheral region of the lens capsule is less pliable so that as the zonules relax during accommodation the peripheral lens surface flattens as the central region of the capsule steepens. Mathematical modelling predicts the opposite,31 and shows that during zonular relaxation the natural variation in capsular thickness enhances peripheral steepening. Our simulations also show that it is unlikely that the natural variation in capsular thickness plays a significant role in the qualitative change in lenticular shape that is associated with zonular traction. The same topographical changes occurred in response to an outward equatorial force applied to biconvex objects independent of their capsular thickness or modulus of elasticity.

Helmholtz theory

The Helmholtz theory2 predicts that both the central and peripheral surfaces of all biconvex objects, independent of their shape, should become thinner and flatter with equatorial traction. Our simulations show that this will only occur when the biconvex object is spherical or oval.

Accommodative response

This study indicates that a small increase in equatorial diameter of objects with a long oval profile (a minor to major axis ratio of [less-than-or-eq, slant]0.6) will result in central steepening and peripheral flattening of the surfaces. Human and primate lenses have a similar ratio of their central thickness to equatorial diameter after birth, always [less-than-or-eq, slant]0.6.49 Interestingly, animals that have minimal accommodative amplitude—such as mice, dogs, cats, rabbits, goats, sheep, cows, and horses—have lenses with minor axis to major axis ratios greater than 0.6.52,53,54,55,56


In summary, we find that an outward equatorial force applied to biconvex objects with a long oval profile, similar to the profile of the human crystalline lens, results in central steepening and peripheral surface flattening. The wide and consistent distribution of this physical change in the configuration of biconvex surfaces in response to outward equatorial force suggests the universality of these changes and why similar dynamics might be expected of the human lens during accommodation. These conclusions are opposite to those associated with the Helmholtz theory of accommodation.


Competing interests: Dr Schachar has a financial interest in the surgical reversal of presbyopia.


1. Young T. On the mechanism of the eye. Phil Trans R Soc 1801. 9223–88.88.
2. von Helmholtz H. Uber die akkommodation des auges. Arch Ophthalmol 1844. 11–74.74.
3. Tscherning M. Physiological optics, second edition. Philadelphia: The Keystone 1904. 160–189.189.
4. Fincham E F. Mechanism of accommodation. Br J Ophthalmol 1937. 8(suppl)2–80.80.
5. Weale R A. A biography of the eye: development, growth, age. London: HK Lewis, 1982.
6. Farnsworth P N, Shyne S E. Anterior zonular shifts with age. Exp Eye Res 1979. 28291–297.297. [PubMed]
7. Rohen J W. Scanning electron microscopic studies of the zonular apparatus in human and monkey eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1979. 18133–144.144. [PubMed]
8. Schachar R A. Cause and treatment of presbyopia with a method for increasing the amplitude of accommodation. Ann Ophthalmol. 1992;24:445–7,452.
9. Tamm E, Croft M A, Jungkunz W. et al Age‐related loss of ciliary muscle mobility in the rhesus monkey. Role of the choroid. Arch Ophthalmol 1992. 110871–876.876. [PubMed]
10. Pierscionek B K, Weale R A. Presbyopia – a maverick of human aging. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 1995. 20229–240.240. [PubMed]
11. Schachar R A. Is Helmholtz's theory of accommodation correct? Ann Ophthalmol 1999. 3110–17.17.
12. Coleman D J, Fish S K. Presbyopia, accommodation, and the mature catenary. Ophthalmology 2001. 1081544–1551.1551. [PubMed]
13. Strenk S A, Strenk L M, Koretz J F. The mechanism of presbyopia. Prog Retin Eye Res 2005. 24379–393.393. [PubMed]
14. Sarfarazi M F.New look at the mechanism of accommodation. American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 16 April 2005, session 1‐E [abstract]
15. Schachar R A. The mechanism of accommodation and presbyopia. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2006. 4634–61.61.
16. Schachar R A. The mechanism of accommodation and presbyopia. In: Agarwal A, editor. Presbyopia: a surgical textbook. Thorofare, New Jersey: Slack Inc, 2002. 37–49.49.
17. Rosin P L. On Serlio's constructions of ovals. Math Intell 2001. 2358–69.69.
18. Jenkins F A, White H E. Fundamentals of optics, third edition. New York: McGraw‐Hill 1957. 82–97.97.
19. Fygenson D K, Marko J F, Libchaber A. Mechanics of microtubule‐based membrane extension. Phys Rev Lett 1997. 794497–4500.4500.
20. Fygenson D K, Elbaum M, Shraiman B, Libchaber A. Microtubules and vesicles under controlled tension. Phys Rev E 1997. 55850–859.859.
21. Bland J M, Altman D G, Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement Lancet. pp. 307–310.
22. Kerwin J P.SP‐401 Skylab, classroom in space. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), 1973:‐401/p135.htm.
23. Stadfeldt A E. Di veränderung der lines bei traction der zonula. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1896. 34429–431.431.
24. Pierscionek B. In vitro alteration of human lens curvature by radial stretching. Exp Eye Res. 1993;57:629–35. [Central steepening secondary to zonular traction is determined by calculating the radius of curvature at x = 0 from the quadratic formulas given for the 27‐year‐old lens in table 1. ]
25. Schachar R A. Qualitative effect of zonular tension on freshly extracted intact human crystalline lenses: implications for the mechanism of accommodation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004. 452691–2695.2695. [PubMed]
26. Dubbelman M, Van der Heijde G L, Weeber H A. Change in shape of the aging human crystalline lens with accommodation. Vision Res 2005. 45117–132.132. [PubMed]
27. Li Y, Chalta M R, Huang Measurement of lens curvature change during accommodation with high‐speed optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:E‐abstract 2554.
28. Ninomiya S, Fujikado T, Kuroda T. et al Changes of ocular aberration with accommodation. Am J Ophthalmol 2002. 134924–926.926. [PubMed]
29. Hazel C A, Cox M J, Strang N C. Wavefront aberration and its relationship to the accommodative stimulus‐response function in myopic subjects. Optom Vis Sci 2003. 80151–158.158. [PubMed]
30. Plainis S, Ginis H S, Pallikaris A. The effect of ocular aberrations on steady‐state errors of accommodative response. J Vis 2005. 5466–477.477. [PubMed]
31. Chien C H, Huang T, Schachar R A. Analysis of human crystalline lens accommodation. J Biomech 2006. 39672–680.680. [PubMed]
32. Ziebarth N M, Manns F, Uhlhorn S R. et al Noncontact optical measurement of lens capsule thickness in human, monkey, and rabbit postmortem eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005. 461690–1697.1697. [PubMed]
33. Duke‐Elder S, Gloster J, Weale R A. The physiology of the eye and of vision. In: Duke‐Elder S, editor. System of ophthalmology, vol 4. London: Henry Kimpton 1968. 365–372.372.
34. Duck F A. Physical properties of tissue: a comprehensive reference book. London: Academic Press, 1990. 160–161.161.
35. Burd H J, Wilde G S, Judge S J. Can reliable values of Young's modulus be deduced from Fisher's (1971) spinning lens measurements? Vision Res 2006. 461346–1360.1360. [PubMed]
36. Subbaram M V, Gump J C, Bullimore M A. et al The elasticity of the human lens. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:E‐abstract 468.
37. Schachar R A. Change in intralenticular pressure during accommodation [eLetter]. Invest Ophthal Vis Res. 2004,
38. Schachar R A, Abolmaali A, Kamangar F. Commentary on Stachs O et al: Three‐dimensional ultrasound, biomicroscopy environmental and conventional scanning electron microscopy investigations of the human zonula ciliaris for numerical modelling of accommodation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2006. 2441062–1063.1063. [PubMed]
39. Schachar R A, Pierscionek B K. Lens hardness not related to the age‐related decline of accommodative amplitiude. Mol Vis 2007. 131010–1011.1011. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Alio J L, Schimchak P, Negri H P. et al Crystalline lens optical dysfunction through aging. Ophthalmology 2005. 1122022–2029.2029. [PubMed]
41. Hogan M J, Alvarado J A, Weddell J E. Histology of the human eye. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 1971. 665–673.673.
42. Rakic J M, Galand A, Vrensen G F. Separation of fibres from the capsule enhances mitotic activity of human lens epithelium. Exp Eye Res 1997. 6467–72.72. [PubMed]
43. Ayaki M, Ishii Y. Scanning electron microscopic observation of hydrodissected human lens nucleus. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 1993. 971292–1297.1297. [PubMed]
44. Nordmann J, Mack G, Mack G. Nucleus of the human lens. III. Its separation, its hardness. Ophthalmic Res 1974. 6216–222.222.
45. Kurtz S, Leibovitch I, Shemesh G. et al The effect of latanoprost on accommodation in young patients with ocular hypertension. J Glaucoma 2003. 1254–56.56. [PubMed]
46. Stachs O, Martin H, Behrend D. et al Three‐dimensional ultrasound biomicroscopy, environmental and conventional scanning electron microscopy investigations of the human zonula ciliaris for numerical modelling of accommodation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2006. 244836–844.844. [PubMed]
47. Schachar R A, Bax A J. Mechanism of human accommodation as analyzed by nonlinear finite analysis. Compr Ther 2001. 27122–132.132. [PubMed]
48. Abolmaali A, Schachar R A, Le T. Sensitivity study of human crystalline lens accommodation. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2007. 8577–90.90. [PubMed]
49. Mann I. The development of the human eye, third edition. New York: Grune & Stratton 1969. 46–67.67.
50. Schachar R A. Growth patterns of fresh human crystalline lenses measured by in vitro photographic biometry. J Anat 2005. 206575–580.580. [PubMed]
51. Kuszak J R, Peterson K L, Sivak J G. et al The interrelationship of lens anatomy and optical quality. II. Primate lenses. Exp Eye Res 1994. 59521–535.535. [PubMed]
52. Prince J H, Diesem C D, Eglitis I. et al Anatomy and histology of the eye and orbit of domestic animals. Springfield: Charles C Thomas 1960.
53. Pierscionek B, Augusteyn R C. Growth related changes to functional parameters in the bovine lens. Biochim Biophys Acta 1992. 1116283–290.290. [PubMed]
54. Sivak J G, Herbert K L, Peterson K L. et al The interrelationship of lens anatomy and optical quality. I. Non‐primate lenses. Exp Eye Res 1994. 59505–520.520. [PubMed]
55. Kuszak J R, Zoltoski R K, Sivertson C. Fibre cell organization in crystalline lenses. Exp Eye Res 2004. 78673–687.687. [PubMed]
56. Schachar R A, Pierscionek B K, Abolmaali A. et al The relationship between accommodative amplitude and the ratio of central lens thickness to its equational diameter in vertebrate eyes. Br J Ophthmol 2007. 91812–817.817.

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group