This study provides direct evidence for the importance of Gα
i2 for platelet activation resulting in aggregation. Platelets from
Gαi2–/– mice have been found to be defective for ADP-dependent inhibition of adenylyl cyclase, integrin activation, and aggregation. Intracellular calcium mobilization and shape change were not affected, which is consistent with previous results with
Gαq–/– platelets and selective ADP receptor antagonists, which suggested a predominant role of the G
q pathway for these responses (
6,
23). Lack of expression of Gα
i2 resulted in only partial signaling defects. It is conceivable that other inhibitory G proteins expressed in the
Gαi2–/– platelets, such as Gα
i3 and maybe Gα
z , can be activated by ADP receptors even though they might not couple efficiently to these receptors in wild-type platelets when Gα
i2 is present. This would be consistent with the finding that
Gαz–/– platelets display normal cAMP signaling in response to ADP and thrombin-receptor stimulation (
7). The fact that any defects could be detected in the presence of a likely excess of other inhibitory G proteins supports the crucial role of Gα
i2 in this signaling pathway.
The finding that integrin activation was more affected in the
Gαi2–/– platelets than inhibition of adenylyl cyclase points to a pathway between Gα
i2 and the integrin that is independent of cAMP and strongly suggests a pivotal role for Gα
i2 in inside-out signaling. However, the almost complete loss of ADP-dependent integrin activation did not result in a similar dramatic effect on platelet aggregation, although integrin activation is thought to be a prerequisite of aggregation. There are at least two possible explanations for this apparent discrepancy. First, platelets from β
3 integrin heterozygous -/+mice that express only 50% of wild-type level of GPIIb-IIIa are still capable of full aggregation (
25). Second, in contrast to measurements of FITC-fibrinogen binding, aggregation assays are performed with an excess of fibrinogen and stirring, facilitating integrin outside-in signaling that enhances aggregation (
1). A contribution of released thromboxane A
2 to the observed aggregation can be excluded, because addition of a thromboxane A
2 receptor antagonist did not affect aggregation induced by ADP or thrombin (H.-M. Jantzen, unpublished observations).
The data in the present study support a role of Gα
i2 in thrombin-dependent inhibition of adenylyl cyclase, integrin activation, and aggregation, although the effect was less pronounced than with ADP. Interestingly, blockade of the ADP receptor mediating inhibition of adenylyl cyclase (P2Y
12) by 2MeSAMP in wild-type platelets had effects on thrombin signaling that were similar to those of the Gα
i2 knockout. This supports the hypothesis that Gα
i2 does not directly couple to mouse platelet thrombin receptors, but instead ADP released upon thrombin activation of platelets activates Gα
i2 -coupled ADP receptors. These results are also consistent with other reports emphasizing the role of released ADP and a G
i-linked ADP receptor in platelet activation by other agonists (
21,
26–
29). The observation that the P2Y
12 antagonist 2MeSAMP interfered with thrombin effects on adenylyl cyclase and fibrinogen binding to a larger extent than did the Gα
i2 gene disruption, substantiates the conclusion above that the P2Y
12 receptor couples to other proteins of the G
i family in addition to Gα
i2. The findings presented here suggesting that mouse thrombin receptors do not directly mediate inhibition of adenylyl cyclase in intact platelets support the observation that the cloned thrombin receptors PAR3 and PAR4 do not couple to adenylate cyclase (
30). Unlike mouse platelets, human platelets express PAR1 instead of PAR3, and PAR1 is capable of mediating inhibition of adenylyl cyclase, indicating a different role for Gα
i2 in thrombin signaling in human platelets (
31).
The signaling cascade between G
i2 and activation of the platelet integrin α
IIbβ
3 (GPIIb-IIIa) still remains to be elucidated. Gα
i2 mediates inhibition of adenylyl cyclase, but direct inhibition of the enzyme, even with concomitant activation of the G
q pathway, is not sufficient for platelet aggregation (
16–
18). Since high cAMP levels prevent platelet activation, the phosphorylation-dephosphorylation equilibrium of substrates of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase A might be important for inside-out signaling. Alternatively, cAMP and Gα
i2 could directly interact with Epac and Rap1GAPII, respectively, which are regulators of Rap1, a small guanine nucleotide-binding protein activated by ADP and thrombin (
32–
34).
This study demonstrates a critical role for Gα
i2 in platelet activation, especially by ADP. However, it is possible that the absence of the βγ subunits normally released from activated Gα
i2 and not the lack of Gα
i2 per se, is responsible for some of the observed defects. For example, βγ subunits can activate isoforms of phosphoinositide-3-OH kinase (PI 3-kinase). PI 3-kinases and released ADP acting on the adenylyl cyclase–coupled ADP receptor (P2Y
12) appear to be important for the stabilization of platelet aggregates (
1,
21,
27,
29). Alternatively, released βγ subunits may activate nonreceptor tyrosine kinases and other signaling proteins (
1,
35). The challenge for future research will be the identification of the missing links of the signaling cascade between Gα
i2 and platelet integrin α
IIbβ
3 (GPIIb-IIIa). The analysis of platelet function from mice lacking Gα
i2 , other signaling proteins, or the Gα
i2 -coupled ADP receptor P2Y
12 in combination with selective inhibitors will facilitate progress toward this goal.