PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of archdischArchives of Disease in ChildhoodVisit this articleSubmit a manuscriptReceive email alertsContact usBMJ
 
Arch Dis Child. 2007 July; 92(7): 655–656.
PMCID: PMC2083750

Reducing the burden of atopic dermatitis – authors' response

We read with interest the stimulating comments by Dr Wjst1 concerning our prebiotic study in infants at risk for allergy.2

Because this was the first study using prebiotics for the prevention of atopic dermatitis, our statistical consultant proposed that the p value should be calculated “conservatively”. However, we agree that the single‐sided test is more appropriate, which indeed changes the p value from 0.014 (as given in the paper) to 0.008.

We were aware of the fact that the risks by parental history of various allergic diseases are not interchangeable, as described in the paper by Dold et al.3 We recorded the allergic diseases of the parents. There was no difference between the two groups with respect to the incidence of parental atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis, asthma, food allergy, drug allergy, etc.

Because both study formulas were supplemented with vitamin D (1.3 μg/100 ml), no extra supplementation was administered to the infants. Thus, the vitamin D intake was sufficient and similar in both groups. Consequently, we can not identify any bias caused either by inappropriate randomisation or by a different influence of vitamin D supplementation.

The policy of Macedonio Melloni Maternity Hospital in Milan (where the study was performed) strongly supports breast feeding. Thanks to a human milk bank, no baby receives any formula during their stay in hospital. After discharge, a free telephone line is available 24 h per day, 7 days per week, to deal with breastfeeding problems. Additionally, all infants after discharge from the hospital are checked in a special department dedicated to the promotion and support of breast feeding.4 This system was also used for the infants enrolled in this study. At discharge, the parents were asked to contact the hospital if they decided to start formula feeding; if they contacted the hospital they were then given information about the study. As demonstrated by the drop‐out analysis, due to the support of the hospital team, several mothers with infants randomised to one of the two formula groups were successfully encouraged to continue or to re‐establish breast feeding (17% and 16%, respectively). The result of the drop‐out analysis clearly indicates that the policy of the hospital did not change during the study period.

In the preceding year, 24.7% of the infants with a parental history of allergy/atopy developed atopic dermatitis during the first year of life, which is quite similar to the number we found in the control group of our study. Thus, there was no difference between the study period and the period with non‐observing conditions. Evaluation of data regarding the parental history of atopy in our hospital population revealed that the mothers tended to have a higher incidence of atopy compared to the fathers (a ratio of 10 to 7) which could explain the relatively high incidence of atopic dermatitis in the first year of life.

The study was planned at the end of 2002 and started in March 2003. At that time, registration was not essential for a clinical trial with an ingredient already on the market. Also, there were no reasons not to register because of confidentiality as the composition of the prebiotic mixture had already been published by our group.5 However, we agree that in view of current practice this study should be registered.

Footnotes

Competing interests: GB is working as Director of Infant Nutrition Research at Numico Research, Friedrichsdorf, Germany.

References

1. Wjst M. Reducing the burden of atopic dermatitis. Arch Dis Child 2007. 92279
2. Moro G, Arslanoglu S, Stahl B. et al A mixture of prebiotic oligosaccharides reduced the incidence of atopic dermatitis during the first 6 months of age. Arch Dis Child 2006. 91814–819.819 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Dold S, Wjst M, von Mutius E. et al Genetic risk for asthma, allergic rhinitis, and atopic dermatitis. Arch Dis Child 1992. 671018–1022.1022 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Moro G E, Arslanoglu S. Allattamento al seno: un argumento ancora caldo. Cosa c'é di nuovo? Riv Ital Med Perinat 2005. 725–30.30
5. Moro G, Minoli I, Mosca M. et al Dosage related bifidogenic effect of galacto‐ and fructo‐oligosaccharides in formula fed term infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2002. 34291–295.295 [PubMed]

Articles from Archives of Disease in Childhood are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group