Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of wtpaEurope PMCEurope PMC Funders GroupSubmit a Manuscript
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2007 November 21.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2082754

Adaptive optics retinal imaging reveals S-cone dystrophy in tritan color-vision deficiency

Rigmor C. Baraas
Department of Optometry and Visual Science, Buskerud University College, 3603 Kongsberg, Norway
Joseph Carroll and Karen L. Gunther
Department of Ophthalmology, The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee WI 53226, USA
Mina Chung
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Rochester, Rochester NY 14627, USA
David R. Williams
Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester NY 14627, USA
David H. Foster
School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester M60 1QD, UK


Tritan color-vision deficiency is an autosomal dominant disorder associated with mutations in the short-wavelength-sensitive- (S-) cone-pigment gene. An unexplained feature of the disorder is that individuals with the same mutation manifest different degrees of deficiency. To date, it has not been possible to examine whether any loss of S-cone function is accompanied by physical disruption in the cone mosaic. Two related tritan subjects with the same novel mutation in their S-cone-opsin gene, but different degrees of deficiency, were examined. Adaptive optics was used to obtain high-resolution retinal images, which revealed distinctly different S-cone mosaics consistent with their discrepant phenotypes. In addition, a significant disruption in the regularity of the overall cone mosaic was observed in the subject completely lacking S-cone function. These results taken together with other recent findings from molecular genetics indicate that, with rare exceptions, tritan deficiency is progressive in nature.


Tritan color-vision deficiency is an inherited autosomal dominant abnormality of short-wavelength-sensitive- (S-) cone function.1,2 The disorder exhibits incomplete penetrance, meaning that individuals with the same underlying mutation manifest different degrees of color-vision impairment, even within a sibship.1,3-8 Mutations in the S-cone-opsin gene, which encodes the protein component of the S-cone photopigment, have been identified, and they give rise to four different single amino acid substitutions that have been found only in affected individuals and not in unaffected control subjects.9-11 Each substitution occurs at an amino acid position that lies in one of the transmembrane alpha helices and is predicted to interfere with folding, processing, or stability of the encoded opsin. For example, one of the mutations identified by Weitz et al.10 corresponds to an amino acid position at which a substitution in the rod pigment rhodopsin causes autosomal dominant retinal degeneration.12,13

A fundamental property differentiating S cones from long-wavelength sensitive (L) and medium-wavelength sensitive (M) cones is the potential for dominant negative interactions between normal and mutant opsins. This is because each S cone expresses both autosomal copies of the S-opsin gene, whereas L and M cones each express only one opsin gene from the X chromosome. Rod photoreceptors also express a rhodopsin gene from two autosomes, and for rhodopsin mutations underlying autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (adRP), dominant negative interactions lead to the death of the photoreceptors and ultimately to the degeneration of the retina. Tritan color-vision deficiencies have not been reported to cause progressive retinal degeneration, possibly because the proportion of S cones in the retina is much smaller than that of rods.10 It thus remains a clear possibility that S cones degenerate in autosomal dominant tritan-associated mutations of the S opsin.

Here, results are reported from experiments using adaptive optics to image the cones of tritan subjects whose molecular defect is known. These images have, for the first time, provided insight into the physical status of S cones in tritan color-vision deficiencies associated with S-opsin mutations. The results suggest that the color-vision deficiency is associated with a progressive S-cone dystrophy and accompanied by a disruption in the regularity of the cone mosaic.


A. Subjects

Two tritan subjects, aged 57 and 34 years, took part in the experiments: one male (M04) and his daughter (M505). The father's tritan son (M503, aged 36 yr) was also included in the first part of the experiment on color-vision testing and genetics. A complete ophthalmic examination was carried out on the father and the daughter. The experiments were conducted in accordance with principles embodied in the Declaration of Helsinki (Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association) and were approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the University of Manchester (genetics and color-vision testing) and the institutional research board at the Medical College of Wisconsin (genetics) and the University of Rochester (adaptive optics imaging). Six normal trichromats [2 male, 4 female; mean age, 26 yr; standard deviation (SD), 3.7 yr] served as controls for the retinal-imaging experiments.

B. Color-vision testing

Subjects were classified with a variety of clinical color-vision tests: the Farnsworth–Munsell 100-Hue test (FM 100-Hue); Ishihara pseudoisochromatic plates (24-plate edition, 1964); and Rayleigh and Moreland anomaloscopy and luminance matching (Interzeag Color Vision meter 712, Schlieren, Switzerland). The father and daughter were also tested on the HRR pseudoisochromatic plates (4th edition, 2002); the Lanthony's desaturated D15; the Farnsworth D15; and the Medmont C100; the father was additionally tested on the Cambridge Color Test.14

C. DNA isolation and genetic analyses

Whole blood was obtained from each subject, and genomic DNA was extracted using the PureGene kit (Gentra Systems, Minneapolis). The five exons that comprise the amino acid coding region of the S-opsin gene were amplified in the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and were sequenced following previously described methods.9 Sequencing reactions were analyzed on an ABI Prism 3100xl genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California). Twenty-nine nontritan subjects served as a control population on the genetic analysis, and their S-opsin genes were also sequenced.

D. Imaging

High-resolution retinal imaging was carried out with the Rochester Second Generation Adaptive Optics System, which has been described in detail elsewhere.15 The subject's head was stabilized with a dental-impression bite bar. The subject's right or left eye was dilated, and accommodation was suspended with a combination of phenylephrine hydrochloride (2.5%) and tropicamide (1%). Measurements of the eye's monochromatic aberrations were taken over a 6.8-mm pupil with a Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor and corrected with a 97-channel deformable mirror (Xinεtics Inc., Devins, Massachusetts) in a continuous closed-loop fashion until the root-mean-square wavefront error fell below 0.1 μm or 800 ms had elapsed, whichever happened first. For further details on wavefront measurements and compensation, see Refs. ​15-​17. Once a wavefront correction was obtained, a retinal image was acquired by illuminating the retina with a 1-deg-diameter, 4-ms flash at 550 nm with 25-nm bandwidth (full width at half-maximum) from a krypton-arc flash lamp. The short duration of the flash helped to minimize the effects of motion blur on the accompanying retinal image. Images were taken with a cooled charge-coupled-device camera (Roper Scientific, Inc., Trenton, New Jersey). To avoid possible edge artifacts from the deformable mirror, imaging was done over a 6-mm pupil. A circular fixation target was used to record the relative retinal location of each image (i.e., nasal, temporal, superior, or inferior as well as eccentricity). Images were averaged using a MATLAB-based image-registration algorithm (MathWorks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts).

In vivo retinal densitometry was combined with this high-resolution retinal-imaging paradigm to identify S cones. Details on the procedure to classify individual cones as S, M, or L have been published,18,19 and only a brief outline is given here. Individual cones in the retinal mosaic were classified by comparing images taken under a fully bleached state [550-nm light of approximately 25 × 106 troland-seconds] with images taken after 5 min of dark adaptation. The absorptance of the cones in the patch of retina imaged was calculated as 1 minus the ratio of the dark-adapted image to the corresponding fully bleached image. Since the L and M cones absorb strongly at 550 nm, they appear bright in the absorptance image, whereas the S cones appear dark owing to their low absorptance at 550 nm.

E. Image analysis

A freely available image-processing program (ImageJ, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland) was used to manually identify the cones in each subject's retinal image. To estimate cone density, the number of cones was divided by the area of retina sampled. The Cartesian (x,y) coordinates of the cones were stored in a text array and used for additional analyses.

To assess the spatial organization of the cone mosaics, the average and SD of nearest-neighbor distances were examined, as well as the Voronoi domains associated with the cones in each mosaic. Voronoi domains were constructed for each cell by defining points in the plane that were closer to that cell than to any other cell in the mosaic. Both metrics are widely used to assess the regularity of cellular mosaics in the retina; see Refs. ​20-​23.


A. Color-vision testing and ophthalmic examination

The father's behavior on all color-vision tests was that of a tritanope. He made tritan errors on the HRR pseudoisochromatic plates, the Lanthony's desaturated D15, and the Farnsworth D15, and his error score on the FM 100-Hue was 206 with midpoint at cap 46 [Fig. 1(a)] [normal error score for an individual aged 50-59 yr is 0-130 (95% CI); see Ref. 24], with a significant blue-yellow axis (difference score between the blue-yellow and red-green axis was +4.3).25 Results from Moreland anomaloscopy and luminance matching showed that he was a tritan with midmatch point (MMP) 14.8 and matching range (MR) 26.9 [normal values (and SD) for the same instrument are MMP 55.1 (5.9), MR 12.0 (1.1)].26, 27 His scores on the Cambridge Colour Test (CCT) were 75, 128 and 1100 on the protan (P), deutan (D) and tritan (T) axes of the Trivector test, respectively; the ellipse length was 13.1, and axis ratio was 551.8 along the tritan axis (angle 99.4 deg) on field 1 of the Ellipse test14 [reported maximum normal values on the Trivector test are 69.3, 82.4, and 113.4 for the P, D and T axes, respectively, and, for field 1 on the Ellipse test are 209.3 for ellipse length and 2.4 for axis ratio28]. He made no errors on the Ishihara pseudoisochromatic plates, nor on the Medmont C100, and his Rayleigh anomaloscopy and luminance matching were normal with MMP 45.4 and MR 1.9 [normal values (and SD) for the same instrument are MMP 49.6 (3.2), MR 5.5 (1.7)].26, 27 He reported that he could not remember having any problems with color vision when he was younger, and it was only in recent years that he has experienced difficulties with discriminating between some colors such as orange-yellow and pink.

Fig. 1
Results of the Farnsworth-Munsell 100-Hue test for subjects (a) M04 (father), (b) M505 (daughter), (c) M503 (son).

The daughter's behavior was as a normal trichromat on the Ishihara pseudoisochromatic plates (no errors), the Farnsworth D15, and Rayleigh and Moreland anomaloscopy and luminance matching (MMP 49.1, MR 1.8; and MMP 50.8, MR 4.2, respectively). She made mild tritan errors on the HRR pseudoisochromatic plates, the Lanthony's desaturated D15, and the FM 100-Hue. Her error score on the FM 100-Hue was 56 with midpoint at cap 44 [Fig. 1(b)] [normal error score for an individual aged 30-39 yr is 0-80 (95% CI)]24; the difference score between the blue-yellow and red-green axis was not significant (0.4).25 She reported never having experienced problems with discriminating colors.

The son's behavior was also that of a normal trichromat on the Ishihara pseudoisochromatic plates (no errors), and Rayleigh and Moreland anomaloscopy and luminance matching (MMP 56.7, MR 1.9; and MMP 56.3, MR 4.2, respectively). His error score on the FM 100-Hue was 56 with midpoint at cap 46 [Fig. 1(c)]; the difference score between the blue-yellow and red-green axis was not significant (0.8).25

Ophthalmic examinations were normal on both father and daughter, and corrected visual acuities were 6/5 (log MAR -0.1) for both.

B. Genetics

The father (M04) and both children (M505 and M503) were heterozygous for a nucleotide change that substituted the polar, neutral amino acid glutamine (Q) in place of the positively charged amino acid arginine (R) that is normally present at amino acid position 283 of the S-opsin gene (Fig. 2; see Ref. 29). All 29 control subjects were homozygous for arginine.

Fig. 2
Model of the S-opsin gene. Circles represent amino acids. The light gray circle indicates the location of the R283Q substitution in the family in this study, who had differing degrees of tritan color-vision deficiency. The other four reported mutations ...

C. Imaging

Cone density for M505 at 1.25-deg temporal from fixation was 48,916 cones/mm2, and cone density for M04 was 59,747 cones/mm2 at 1.0-deg temporal, 55,575 cones/mm2 at 1.12-deg temporal and 45,010 cones/mm2 at 1.25-deg temporal (Table 1). Normal values from adaptive optics images are 54,859 (SD 8205) cones/mm2 at 1.0 deg (n = 14) and 44,330 (SD 4724) cones/mm2 at 1.25 deg (n = 10) (data from normal controls combined with data from Refs. ​30 and ​31).

Table 1
Statistics of the Spatial Arrangement of the Cone Mosaic

Figure 3 shows the full bleached, dark-adapted, and absorptance images for M505 (a) and M04 (b). No evidence for S cones was observed in M04 [Fig. 3(b)]. In M505 about 4.9% of the cones at 1.25 deg were low absorbing [Fig 3(a)]. Since S cones absorb negligibly at the imaging and bleaching wavelength of 550 nm, these cones were deemed S cones. Normalized to M505's overall cone density, the density of S cones at this location was 2224 S cones/mm2. In comparison, the average S-cone density in normal trichromatic subjects when measured with adaptive optics at 1.25-deg eccentricity is 2863 (SD 1033) S cones/mm2.30

Fig. 3
Retinal images of two tritan subjects. (a) Images from the right eye of the daughter (M505). Numerous cones that are either S cones or empty cones are visible as dark regions in the absorptance image. Given M505's behavioral measurements, and the fact ...

D. Arrangement of the cone mosaic

Figure 4 shows the results of the Voronoi analysis for the tritanope (M04) and two normal trichromats. Figures 4(a)-(c) illustrate how the Voronoi polygons are derived from the image of the cone mosaic. The control subjects [Figs. 4(d) and 4(e)] were chosen because their cone densities were the closest to M04's cone density at 1.0-deg eccentricity. Seventy percent of cones in the normal mosaics had six neighbors, indicating a regularly packed, triangular mosaic. In contrast, only 55% of the cones in M04's mosaic had six neighbors [Fig. 4(f)]. Qualitatively, it appears that there are more disruptions in M04's mosaic. In fact, the mean SD in the number of sides on the Voronoi polygons for the control subjects was 0.593 with a SD of 0.064, whereas M04's SD in the number of sides on the Voronoi polygons for his mosaics was 0.763, 0.737, and 0.810 at the three locations tested (Table 1). These values are 2.5 SDs from the mean, indicating that his mosaic was significantly more variable than normal (p = 0.0067). To further quantify the features of M04's cone mosaic, the mean area of the Voronoi domains in each mosaic was computed (Table 1). As expected, there is a close relationship between the density of cones in the mosaic and the size of the corresponding Voronoi domains, with more dense mosaics having, on average, smaller Voronoi domains. The mosaic variability (expressed as the SD among the Voronoi areas) is also related to the cone density, with more dense mosaics having less variability [Fig. 5(a)]. Just as there was more variability in the number of sides to the Voronoi polygons in his mosaic, the variability in the area of the Voronoi domains in his mosaic was higher than expected, given his cone density. As seen in Fig. 5(a), both of his data points lie outside the 95% confidence interval derived from the normal controls.

Fig. 4
Analysis of mosaic regularity. (a) Retinal image from a normal trichromat (R008, 1.0 deg). (b) Two-dimensional plot of cone locations from (a). (c) Voronoi domain associated with each cone photoreceptor in (a). (d) Color-coded version of (c), where the ...
Correlation of cone density with (a) SD of Voronoi area and (b) mean NND. Filled circles are from normal controls, open squares are from subject M04 (1.0 and 1.25 deg). Solid line is best-fitting linear regression, and dashed lines are 95% confidence ...

Also highly correlated with cone density is the mean nearest-neighbor distance (NND). As shown in Fig. 5(b), more dense mosaics have cones that are on average more closely spaced. M04's mean NND (Table 1) is significantly lower than what would be expected based on his cone density. Another way to look at the NND data is to compare the observed mean NND for each subject with that expected from a perfectly triangular mosaic of identical density to that observed for this subject. These values are given in Table 1 and were derived from equations published by Coletta and Williams.32, 33 By dividing the observed mean NND by the expected mean NND, it is clear that all control subjects were about 5% below what was expected. This is probably due to the fact that in the computation of the expected mean NND, uniform density was assumed, although in reality, cone density varies over the area of retina analyzed. Small asymmetries derived from intersubject differences in preferred retinal location for fixation34 will affect this ratio as well. Nevertheless, M04's mosaic was significantly different from the controls, as his mean NND was only 90% of that expected based on his density.

Besides indicating a departure from regularity, the ratio of observed NND to expected NND can be used to infer something about the degree of cone loss in the mosaic. A new NND can be calculated for M04 from the expected mean NND for a mosaic of identical density to that for M04, incorporating the ~95% reduction in mean NND observed in the controls. New NND values for M04 would then be 3.62 and 3.75 for his 1.0- and 1.25-deg mosaics, respectively. From the relationship between observed mean NND and cone density [Fig. 5(b)], his extrapolated cone density should then have been 61,510 and 57,670 cones/mm2 for his 1.0- and 1.25-deg mosaics, respectively. This is 1763 and 2095 cones/mm2 below his observed cone density, respectively and this establishes an estimate that he has lost about 1929 cones/mm2, which is consistent with the mean S-cone density in normal trichromats of 2723 (SD 734) cones/mm2, n = 9 (from Ref. 30) for combined data from 1.0- and 1.25-deg eccentricity.

It should be noted that in both graphs in Fig. 5, M04's daughter (M505) was included with the normal controls in order to derive the associated regression lines. This was because normal numbers of S cones were observed in her mosaic and there were no visible disruptions in the regularity of her mosaic. The inclusion of her data with the normal controls is supported by the fact that her data points lay exactly on the regression line in both graphs.


A major step in understanding the mechanism of inherited tritan color-vision deficiencies was afforded by the landmark work of Weitz and colleagues in identifying S-opsin gene mutations in affected individuals.10, 11 The work reported here provides the first anatomical evidence that tritan phenotypes associated with S-opsin mutations are associated with the loss of S cones. This suggests a mechanism in which the mutations produce their effects by reducing the viability of the S cones and that heterozygotes who express both the normal and mutant S opsins will exhibit trichromatic color vision that can be indistinguishable from normal until the S cones succumb to the toxicity of the mutant opsin.

It is evident from this study of an affected father and daughter that there is a correlation between behavioral loss of S-cone function and physical disruption in the cone mosaic. S cones are sparse in the normal retina, comprising about 5% of the photoreceptors, with their highest density (>2000 cones/mm2) at about 1.0-dega eccentricity35, but with large variations between individuals.36 The difference between father and daughter in this study, however, is too large to be considered as within-normal intersubject variability: The daughter showed near-normal S-cone density and the father a complete loss at the eccentricity where peak S-cone density normally occurs.35(b) The expectation is that the number of S cones in the daughter's mosaic would be further reduced if she were imaged later in life. The fact that the father's total cone density was still within the normal range even if he had lost all his S cones is not surprising, as the normal variation in total cone density exceeds 5%.18, 36, 37

One limitation of the present study is the absence of age-matched controls for the analysis of the spatial topography of the tritanope mosaic of the father. It might be argued that, as part of the normal ageing process, a significant number of foveal cones are lost, thereby disrupting mosaic regularity. In fact, while maximum cone density varies between individuals, the number of foveal cones remains relatively constant throughout adulthood in the absence of retinal disease.38, 39 Since disruption of the mosaic is unlikely to be part of the normal aging process, it follows that it is the loss of S cones that is responsible for mosaic irregularity in the tritanope. In support of this conclusion, no disturbance of the mosaic was detected in an analysis of Hoang et al.'s histological data from a 68-year-old retina40 at the same retinal location as that studied here (data not shown).c

The Voronoi and nearest-neighbor analyses suggest that some reorganization of the cone mosaic took place after the S cones had died: The L and M cones seem to have at least partially filled in the gaps that previously were taken up by S cones, making the father's mosaic look irregular in comparison with the triangular packing seen in that of the daughter and normal trichromatic subjects18, 19, 35; see also Fig. 4. This irregularity suggests that the S cones had completely degenerated after foveal migration was complete.41-43 Mosaic regularity is preserved in early cone loss where foveal migration has acted to repack the cones31, or in other cases where normal foveal migration has occurred but a functional opsin is not expressed in the cones.44 The disruption in mosaic regularity, together with the absence of S cones, is the only visible change in the retina. Thus, despite normal cone density, there are other signatures in the retinal images that can be used. In fact, given how variable cone density is among normal controls, measures of regularity may be more sensitive to the very early stages of cone loss in other photoreceptor degenerations.

Until now, the effects of amino acid substitutions on S cones were unknown, but the absence of S cones coupled with the decreased density and abnormal packing arrangement of the cones in a tritan subject (M04) suggests that heterozygosity for the R283Q mutation ultimately results in the death of S cones. S-opsin mutations that cause autosomal dominant tritan color-vision deficiencies are analogous to rhodopsin mutations that cause autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa in which dominant negative interactions between normal and mutant pigments expressed in the same photoreceptor lead to the death of the affected photoreceptor.45, 46 The molecular genetic and imaging results reported here along with previous molecular genetic data support the hypothesis that the phenotypic difference between the father and daughter with the same mutation can be attributed to their being at different stages in the progression in which dominant negative interactions have compromised the function and viability of S cones. The observation of Went and Pronk8 that error scores on color-vision tests tend to be higher with older tritan subjects than with younger ones also supports this hypothesis. Further, the imaging results are consistent with the loss of S-cone function being due directly to the physical loss of S cones as a result of the mutant S-opsin pathology rather than to the normal aging process.47

Some studies4, 48 have attempted to classify tritan deficiencies into dichromatic and anomalous trichromatic forms by analogy with red-green color-vision deficiencies, and a third form, incomplete tritanopia, has also been proposed3, 6, but the phenotype is not clearly different from tritanomaly.3 A rationale for a tritan phenotype that is analogous to red-green anomalous trichromacy is difficult to justify. Recall that the red-green anomalous trichromacies are caused by the combination of the loss of one class of photoreceptor, L or M, and the addition of a second subtype of the remaining class such that color vision in the red-green region of the spectrum is mediated by two cone types whose spectral sensitivities overlap much more than in normal trichromacy.49 In contrast to the 20-30 nm that separate L from M pigments in normal color vision50, 51, the spectral separation between the L-cone subtypes or M-cone subtypes in anomalous trichromacy ranges from about 1 nm to about 12 nm and, as expected, the degree to which color discrimination is impaired is directly related to the magnitude of the spectral separation.14, 52, 53 Spectral-tuning studies of mammalian short-wavelength-sensitive pigments that are evolutionarily closely related to the human S-cone photopigment have identified amino acid substitutions that are capable of shifting the spectrum over the range from about 359 nm to 423 nm.54, 55 But the human S-cone photopigment peaks at 415-419 nm56, 57 and no amino acid substitutions that affect the S-cone spectrum have been identified in human subjects. Indeed, a shift of about 100 nm in S-cone sensitivity to long wavelengths would be required to produce a degree of overlap between the S- and M-cone sensitivity equivalent to the overlap between M- or L-cone subtypes in red-green deficiencies.52, 53 Such a large shift would not be accomplished with a single amino acid substitution,55 and the anomalous trichromatic tritan phenotype has instead been attributed to the involvement of rods in the color match made by tritan subjects.7

Historically, the existence of congenital tritan color-vision deficiencies has been controversial.58, 59 The incomplete penetrance and general trend of worsening color-vision test scores with increasing age among tritan subjects8 suggests that, at least in some affected individuals, inherited tritan color-vision deficiency is not congenital (i.e., present at birth). The color-vision deficiency associated with mutation in the S-cone opsins is expected to be present from birth in individuals homozygous for a mutation, but not necessarily for heterozygous individuals. This is because the potential for dominant negative interactions between normal and mutant pigment is absent in homozygotes. By the same reasoning, homozygous S-opsin mutations would not necessarily be expected to produce a progressive degeneration, but instead a stationary disorder of the S cones. Although homozygous individuals are thought to be exceptionally rare, tritan individuals from two of the five pedigrees that have been studied in detail contain individuals who are homozygous for an S-opsin mutation, but there are also individuals within these two pedigrees who are heterozygous.10 Within the same pedigree, it would be expected that a younger subject who is homozygous would perform more poorly than an older subject who is heterozygous. Recruitment tactics for identifying tritan subjects for experimental analysis tend to select for rare events such as homozygotes. Most individuals with inherited tritan deficiencies are heterozygous and, according to the hypothesis supported by the experimental data presented here, they need not exhibit complete dichromacy until the disorder has progressed to a stage when a critical number of S cones have lost viability. Variability in phenotype probably derives primarily from differences in the degree to which S-cone function is diminished.


This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust (grant 064669/Z/01/Z), NIH [grants EY04367, EY09303 and EY09620, and F32EY014789 (K. L. Gunther)], by Research to Prevent Blindness, and the Norwegian Research Council (grant 176623/V00). We thank K. Amano, L. Chen, R. F. Itzhaki, J. Neitz, J. Wolfing, and M. A. Wozniak for their assistance, and K. Palczewski for providing us with material for Fig. 2.


aThis value appeared incorrectly in the published article.

bThis citation appeared incorrectly in the published article.

cThis sentence appeared incorrectly in the published article.


1. Wright WD. The characteristics of tritanopia. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 1952;42:509–521. [PubMed]
2. Piantanida T. Genetics of inherited colour vision deficiencies. In: Foster DH, editor. Inherited and Acquired Colour Vision Deficiencies: Fundamental Aspects and Clinical Studies. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Macmillan Press; 1991. pp. 88–114.
3. Cole BL, Henry GH, Nathan J. Phenotypical variations of tritanopia. Vision Research. 1966;6:301–313.
4. Kalmus H. The familial distribution of congenital tritanopia, with some remarks on some similar conditions. Annals of Human Genetics. 1955;20:39–56. [PubMed]
5. Miyake Y, Yagasaki K, Ichikawa H. Differential diagnosis of congenital tritanopia and dominantly inherited juvenile optic atrophy. Archives Ophthalmology. 1985;103:1496–1501. [PubMed]
6. Neuhann T, Kalmus H, Jaeger W. Ophthalmological findings in the tritans, described by Wright and Kalmus. Modern Problems in Ophthalmology. 1976;17:135–142. [PubMed]
7. Pokorny J, Smith VC, Went LN. Color matching in autosomal dominant tritan defect. Journal of Optical Society of America. 1981;71:1327–1334. [PubMed]
8. Went LN, Pronk N. The genetics of tritan disturbances. Human Genetics. 1985;69:255–262. [PubMed]
9. Gunther KL, Neitz J, Neitz M. A novel mutation in the short-wavelength-sensitive cone pigment gene associated with a tritan color vision defect. Visual Neuroscience. 2006;23:403–409. [PubMed]
10. Weitz CJ, Miyake Y, Shinzato K, Montag E, Zrenner E, Went LN, Nathans J. Human tritanopia associated with two amino acid substitutions in the blue-sensitive opsin. American Journal of Human Genetics. 1992;50:498–507. [PubMed]
11. Weitz CJ, Went LN, Nathans J. Human tritanopia associated with a third amino acid substitution in the blue-sensitive visual pigment. American Journal of Human Genetics. 1992;51:444–446. [PubMed]
12. Hwa J, Garriga P, Liu X, Khorana HG. Structure and function in rhodopsin: packing of the helices in the transmembrane domain and folding to a tertiary structure in the intradiscal domain are coupled. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U S A. 1997;94:10571–10576. [PubMed]
13. Sheffield VC, Fishman GA, Beck JS, Kimura AE, Stone EM. Identification of novel rhodopsin mutations associated with retinitis pigmentosa by GC-clamped denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. American Journal of Human Genetics. 1991;49:699–706. [PubMed]
14. Regan BC, Reffin JP, Mollon JD. Luminance noise and the rapid determination of discrimination ellipses in colour deficiency. Vision Research. 1994;34:1279–1299. [PubMed]
15. Hofer H, Artal P, Singer B, Aragón JL, Williams DR. Dynamics of the eye's wave aberration. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 2001;18:497–506. [PubMed]
16. Liang J, Williams DR, Miller DT. Supernormal vision and high-resolution retinal imaging through adaptive optics. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 1997;14:2884–2892. [PubMed]
17. Pallikaris A, Williams DR, Hofer H. The reflectance of single cones in the living human eye. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2003;44:4580–4592. [PubMed]
18. Roorda A, Metha AB, Lennie P, Williams DR. Packing arrangement of the three cone classes in primate retina. Vision Research. 2001;41:1291–1306. [PubMed]
19. Roorda A, Williams DR. The arrangement of the three cone classes in the living human eye. Nature. 1999;397:520–522. [PubMed]
20. Galli-Resta L, Novelli E, Kryger Z, Jacobs GH, Reese BE. Modelling the mosaic organization of rod and cone photoreceptors with a minimal-spacing rule. European Journal of Neuroscience. 1999;11:1461–1469. [PubMed]
21. Shapiro MB, Schein SJ, de Monasterio FM. Regularity and structure of the spatial pattern of blue cones of the Macaque retina. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1985:803–812.
22. Wässle H, Riemann HJ. The mosaic of nerve cells in the mammalian retina. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B - Biological Sciences. 1978;200:441–461. [PubMed]
23. Zhan XJ, Troy JB. Modeling cat retinal beta-cell arrays. Visual Neuroscience. 2000;17:23–39. [PubMed]
24. Kinnear PR, Sahraie A. New Farnsworth-Munsell 100 hue test norms of normal observers for each year of age 5-22 and for age decades 30-70. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2002;86:1408–1411. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Smith VC, Pokorny J, Pass AS. Color-axis determination on the Farnsworth-Munsell 100-hue test. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 1985;100:176–182. [PubMed]
26. Kurtenbach A, Schiefer U, Neu A, Zrenner E. Preretinopic changes in the colour vision of juvenile diabetics. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 1999;83:43–46. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Pelizzone M, Sommerhalder J, Roth A, Hermès D. Automated Rayleigh and Moreland matches on a computer-controlled anomaloscope. In: Drum B, Moreland JD, Serra A, editors. Colour Vision Deficiencies. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1991. pp. 151–159.
28. Ventura DF, Silveira LCL, Rodrigues AR, De Souza JM, Gualtieri M, Bonci D, Costa MF. Preliminary norms for the Cambridge Colour Test. In: Mollon JD, Pokorny J, Knoblauch K, editors. Normal & Defective Colour Vision. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003. pp. 331–339.
29. Stenkamp RE, Filipek S, Driessen CAGG, Teller DC, Palczewski K. Crystal structure of rhodopsin: a template for cone visual pigments and other G protein-coupled receptors. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2002;1565:168–182. [PubMed]
30. Hofer H, Carroll J, Neitz J, Neitz M, Williams DR. Organization of the human trichromatic cone mosaic. Journal of Neuroscience. 2005;25:9669–9679. [PubMed]
31. Carroll J, Neitz M, Wolfing J, Gray D, Neitz J, Williams DR. Different genetic causes of red–green color blindness give rise to different retinal phenotypes as assessed with adaptive optics. Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 2004;45 E-Abstract 4341.
32. Coletta NJ, Williams DR. Psychophysical estimate of extrafoveal cone spacing. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 1987;4:1503–1513. [PubMed]
33. Williams DR, Coletta NJ. Cone spacing and the visual resolution limit. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 1987;4:1514–1523. [PubMed]
34. Putnam NM, Hofer HJ, Doble N, Chen L, Carroll J, Williams DR. The locus of fixation and the foveal cone mosaic. Journal of Vision. 2005;5:632–639. [PubMed]
35. Curcio CA, Allen KA, Sloan KR, Lerea CL, Hurley JB, Klock IB, Milam AH. Distribution and morphology of human cone photoreceptors stained with anti-blue opsin. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 1991;312:610–624. [PubMed]
36. Curcio CA, Sloan KR, Kalina RE, Hendrickson AE. Human photoreceptor topography. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 1990;292:497–523. [PubMed]
37. Gao H, Hollyfield JG. Aging of the human retina. Differential loss of neurons and retinal pigment epithelial cells. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 1992;33:1–17. [PubMed]
38. Spear PD. Neural bases of visual deficits during aging. Vision Research. 1993;33:2589–2609. [PubMed]
39. Jackson GR, Owsley C, Curcio CA. Photoreceptor degeneration and dysfunction in aging and age-related maculopathy. Ageing Research Reviews. 2002;1:381–396. [PubMed]
40. Hoang QV, Linsenmeier RA, Chung CK, Curcio CA. Photoreceptor inner segments in monkey and human retina: mitochondrial density, optics, and regional variation. Visual Neuroscience. 2002;19:395–407. [PubMed]
41. Hendrickson AE, Yuodelis C. The morphological development of the human fovea. Ophthalmology. 1984;91:603–612. [PubMed]
42. Yuodelis C, Hendrickson A. A qualitative and quantitative analysis of the human fovea during development. Vision Research. 1986;26:847–855. [PubMed]
43. Diaz-Araya C, Provis JM. Evidence of photoreceptor migration during early foveal development: a quantitative analysis of human fetal retinae. Visual Neuroscience. 1992;8:505–514. [PubMed]
44. Carroll J, Neitz M, Hofer H, Neitz J, Williams DR. Functional photoreceptor loss revealed with adaptive optics: An alternate cause of color blindness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U S A. 2004;101:8461–8466. [PubMed]
45. Dryja TP, Hahn LB, Cowley GS, McGee TL, Berson EL. Mutation spectrum of the rhodopsin gene among patients with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U S A. 1991;88:9370–9374. [PubMed]
46. Sung CH, Davenport CM, Hennessey JC, Maumenee IH, Jacobson SG, Heckenlively JR, Nowakowski R, Fishman G, Gouras P, Nathans J. Rhodopsin mutations in autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U S A. 1991;88:6481–6485. [PubMed]
47. Curcio CA, Millican CL, Allen KA, Kalina RE. Aging of the human photoreceptor mosaic: evidence for selective vulnerability of rods in central retina. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 1993;34:3278–3296. [PubMed]
48. Henry GH, Cole BL, Nathan J. The inheritance of congenital tritanopia with the report of an extensive pedigree. Annals of Human Genetics, London. 1964;27:219–231. [PubMed]
49. Neitz M, Neitz J. Molecular genetics of color vision and color vision defects. Archives of Ophthalmology. 2000;118:691–700. [PubMed]
50. Carroll J, Neitz J, Neitz M. Estimates of L:M cone ratio from ERG flicker photometry and genetics. Journal of Vision. 2002;2:531–542. [PubMed]
51. Sharpe LT, Stockman A, Jägle H, Knau H, Klausen G, Reitner A, Nathans J. Red, green, and red-green hybrid pigments in the human retina: correlations between deduced protein sequences and psychophysically measured spectral sensitivities. The Journal of Neuroscience. 1998;18:10053–10069. [PubMed]
52. Shevell SK, He JC, Kainz P, Neitz J, Neitz M. Relating color discrimination to photopigment genes in deutan observers. Vision Research. 1998;38:3371–3376. [PubMed]
53. Neitz J, Neitz M, Kainz PM. Visual pigment gene structure and the severity of color vision defects. Science. 1996;274:801–804. [PubMed]
54. Parry JWL, Poopalasundaram S, Bowmaker JK, Hunt DM. A novel amino acid substitution is responsible for spectral tuning in a rodent violet-sensitive visual pigment. Biochemistry. 2004;43:8014–8020. [PubMed]
55. Yokoyama S, Starmer WT, Takahashi Y, Tada T. Tertiary structure and spectral tuning of UV and violet pigments in vertebrates. Gene. 2006;365:95–103. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
56. Fasick JI, Lee N, Oprian DD. Spectral tuning in the human blue cone pigment. Biochemistry. 1999;38:11593–11596. [PubMed]
57. Dartnall HJ, Bowmaker JK, Mollon JD. Human visual pigments: microspectrophotometric results from the eyes of seven persons. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B - Biological Sciences. 1983;220:115–130. [PubMed]
58. Krill AE, Smith VC, Pokorny J. Further studies supporting the identity of congenital tritanopia and hereditary dominant optic atrophy. Investigative Ophthalmology. 1971;10:457–465. [PubMed]
59. Smith DP, Cole BL, Isaacs A. Congenital tritanopia without neuroretinal disease. Investigative Ophthalmology. 1973;12:608–617. [PubMed]