PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jnnpsycJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and PsychiatryCurrent TOCInstructions for authors
 
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. Apr 2006; 77(4): 495–499.
PMCID: PMC2077483
Neurological abnormalities in young adults born preterm
M Allin, M Rooney, T Griffiths, M Cuddy, J Wyatt, L Rifkin, and R Murray
M Allin, M Cuddy, L Rifkin, R Murray, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College, London, UK
M Rooney, St Michael's Unit, Mercy University Hospital, Grenville Place, Cork, Ireland
T Griffiths, Regional Neurosciences Centre, Newcastle General Hospital, Westgate Rd, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
J Wyatt, Perinatal Brain Research Group, Department of Paediatrics, University College London Medical School, London, UK
Correspondence to: Dr Matthew Allin
Section of General Psychiatry, Division of Psychological Medicine, Box 063, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK; matthew.allin@iop.kcl.ac.uk
Received July 19, 2005; Revised October 4, 2005; Accepted October 9, 2005.
Objective
Individuals born before 33 weeks' gestation (very preterm, VPT) have an increased likelihood of neurological abnormality, impaired cognitive function, and reduced academic performance in childhood. It is currently not known whether neurological signs detected in VPT children persist into adulthood or become attenuated by maturation of the CNS.
Method
We assessed 153 VPT individuals and 71 term‐born controls at 17–18 years old, using a comprehensive neurological examination. This examination divides neurological signs into primary and integrative domains, the former representing the localising signs of classical neurology, and the latter representing signs requiring integration between different neural networks or systems. Integrative signs are sub‐divided into three groups: sensory integration, motor confusion, and sequencing. The VPT individuals have been followed up since birth, and neonatal information is available on them, along with the results of neurological assessment at 4 and 8 years of age and neuropsychological assessment at 18 years of age.
Results
The total neurology score and primary and integrative scores were significantly increased in VPT young adults compared to term‐born controls. Within the integrative domain, sensory integration and motor confusion scores were significantly increased in the VPT group, but sequencing was not significantly different between the VPT and term groups. Integrative neurological abnormalities at 18 were strongly associated with reduced IQ but primary abnormalities were not.
Conclusions
Neurological signs are increased in VPT adults compared to term‐born controls, and are strongly associated with reduced neuropsychological function.
Keywords: IQ, neurodevelopment, neurological examination, preterm birth, soft signs
Individuals born before 33 gestational weeks (very preterm, VPT) are more likely than their term‐born peers to exhibit neurological and neuropsychological impairments and to do less well at school. This is likely related to the increased risk of brain injury in VPT individuals.1,2,3,4,5 Neurological impairments have been found to be more common in preterm and low birth weight children6,7,8,9,10 and range in severity from impairments with disability (such as sensorineural hearing loss, amblyopia, and spastic tetraplegia, hemiplegia, or paraplegia) to lesser impairments not associated with disability.7 These lesser impairments have been reported to include agnosias, apraxias, tone or reflex asymmetry, poor coordination of fine movements,6 dystonia, dysdiadochokinesis, and mirror movements.11 In a recent follow‐up study, Foulder‐Hughes and Cooke12 assessed 280 VPT children and found that rates of neurological abnormality varied from 24 to 42% depending on the test used, suggesting that the neurological abnormalities found in VPT children are heterogeneous and may be fully elucidated only by a comprehensive neurological examination. Few studies have followed up VPT individuals into adulthood, and it is therefore not clear whether neurological abnormalities persist into adult life or are attenuated by ongoing maturation of the CNS. It is also not clear whether neurological abnormalities in adulthood are associated with impairments in other domains, such as cognitive functioning.
This study aimed to follow up a cohort of VPT 18 year olds and compare them to full‐term born control 18 year olds with a detailed and comprehensive clinical neurological examination. The primary prediction was that VPT 18 year olds would show more neurological abnormalities than the term‐born control group. We further predicted that neurological abnormalities would be associated with reduced neuropsychological performance in adulthood.
Study groups
VPT group
The potential study group consisted of 318 individuals born before 33 weeks' gestation and admitted between 1979 and 1983 to University College Hospital London (UCLH) Neonatal Unit within 5 days of birth. They were enrolled into a prospective study of outcomes of preterm birth. Assessments of neurological and cognitive development were performed at 1 and 4 years of corrected age (that is, the age the child would have been if the pregnancy had actually gone to term) and at 8 and 14 years of age. At 17–18 years of age, 154 individuals (48%) from this cohort were assessed. Those who were assessed at 18 years of age did not differ significantly from those who were not assessed in paternal social class (χ2 = 2.56; df = 5; p = 0.768), birth weight (t = −0.781; df = 316; p = 0.436), gestational age (t = 0.202; df = 316; p = 0.840), or gender (χ2 = 0.374; p = 0.541).
Term‐born comparison group
Fifty three infants who were delivered at term (38–42 weeks) at University College Hospital from 1979 to 1980 had been enrolled as age matched controls for assessments made on the VPT cohort at 4 years of age. These individuals were contacted at the same time as the VPT group and 18 agreed to take part in the study. A further 55 term‐born, normal birthweight individuals were recruited from advertisements in the local and national press. The control group thus consisted of 73 individuals.
Neurological instrument
VPT and term‐born individuals were assessed blind to status by one of two investigators (MA or MR). The neurological assessment procedure followed that of Griffiths et al13 and is a modified version of the Neurological Evaluation Scale of Buchanan and Heinrichs.14 A scoring instrument was used to rate a structured clinical neurological examination (table 11).). The examination proceeded in a stereotyped order. Each item was given a rating of 0, 1, or 2 (0 = no abnormality, 1 = mild abnormality, 2 = definite abnormality). The instrument is divided into primary and integrative signs. Primary signs are those that may be elicited by a traditional neurological examination. They include cranial nerve abnormalities, asymmetry of limb reflexes, and eye movement abnormalities. Integrative signs are those that are likely to require integration within the motor system, or between the motor and sensory systems. They are likely to depend on distributed processing involving more than one neural network and are not localising in the same way as the primary signs. They have often been referred to as soft neurological signs. The integrative signs are further divided into sensory integration, motor confusion, and sequencing domains (table 11).
Table thumbnail
Table 1 Individual neurological signs in the primary and integrative domains of the neurological assessment instrument
Inter‐rater reliability
Ratings were performed by MA and MR, who completed inter‐rater reliability testing by independently rating video assessments made by a third investigator (TG). Inter‐rater reliability between MA and MR was: total neurology, α = 0.97; primary signs, α = 0.99; integrative signs, α = 0.96.
Neuropsychological assessment
Neuropsychological testing was performed at 18 years of age, using a short (five subtest) form of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Revised (WAIS‐R).15,16
Statistical analysis
The neurological instrument produced a score which did not follow a normal distribution in either the VPT or term groups, with clustering of values around zero. Transformations of the data did not yield a normal distribution. The Mann‐Whitney U test was used to compare the two groups. χ2 or Fisher's exact test was used for comparison of categorical data between groups. Associations between neurological outcome and other data were explored using Kendall partial correlation analyses controlling for social class and age at assessment.
Study subjects
One VPT case was excluded as he had had an episode of meningitis 4 years previously which had been associated with a period of coma. Two control subjects were excluded as one had suffered a significant head injury as a child and the other had a history of birth complications on more detailed assessment.
Therefore 153 VPT cases and 71 controls were included in the analysis. The VPT group was slightly, but significantly, younger when assessed, and had lower IQ. The VPT group had increased rates of left and mixed handedness, although this difference did not reach statistical significance. The groups did not differ significantly in gender distribution, but there was a significant difference in social class distribution (table 22).). Since socioeconomic disadvantage is known to adversely affect developmental outcome in preterm and low birth weight children,17 social class and age at assessment were used as covariates in the subsequent analyses.
Table thumbnail
Table 2 Comparison of demographic details of the VPT and term groups
Neurological examination
The total neurological examination score was significantly raised in the VPT group compared to the term group (U = 3914; p = 0.001) (table 33).
Table thumbnail
Table 3 Comparison of summed scores on the neurological instrument between cases and controls
Both primary (U = 3972; p = 0.001) and integrative (U = 4250; p = 0.008) subtotals were significantly increased in VPT individuals. Sensory integration (U = 4321; p = 0.005) and motor confusion (U = 4248; p = 0.003) subtotals were also significantly higher in the VPT group, but the sequencing subtotal was not significantly different between the two groups.
Distribution of individual neurological signs
For all variables, more VPT individuals were rated deviant than term controls (table 44).). The difference was statistically significant for the following measures: left‐sided cranial nerve palsy (χ2 = 8.54; p = 0.014), gaze impersistence (χ2 = 5.89; p = 0.053), Romberg's sign (Fisher's exact test = 3.88; p = 0.044), left‐sided mirror movements (χ2 = 5.81; p = 0.055), right‐left confusion (χ2 = 6.24; p = 0.044), and left (χ2 = 7.44; p = 0.024) and right (χ2 = 8.17; p = 0.017) finger‐nose co‐ordination.
Table thumbnail
Table 4 Group scores for individual measures
Gender differences
In the VPT group, there were no significant differences between males and females in neurological examination scores in any of the summed categories. However, in term‐born controls, there was a disparity between males and females, such that males had significantly higher total neurological (U = 435; p = 0.035) and primary signs (U = 371; p = 0.004) scores than females (table 55).
Table thumbnail
Table 5 Comparison of summed scores on the neurological instrument between male and female term‐born controls
Associations between neurological abnormalities and perinatal variables
There was no relationship between the total neurology score and either birth weight or gestational age. There was a weak correlation between the motor confusion score and birth weight, and significant negative associations between gestational age and integrative signs, particularly motor confusion (table 66).). There were no significant associations between neurology scores at 18 years of age and other perinatal variables, including Apgar scores, time to spontaneous respiration, and indices of acidosis (pH, base excess).
Table thumbnail
Table 6 Associations between neurological outcomes at 18 years of age and birth weight and gestational age
Associations between neurological abnormalities at 18 years of age and IQ scores
Higher total and integrative scores were significantly associated with lower full‐scale, verbal, and performance IQ. There were no significant relationships between IQ measures and primary neurological abnormalities (table 77).
Table thumbnail
Table 7 Associations between neurological outcomes and neuropsychological testing at 18 years of age
In this group of VPT young adults, we have demonstrated an increase in neurological abnormalities compared to a term‐born control group. Total, primary, and integrative abnormalities were all increased relative to the term group. The VPT group also had increased rates of left or mixed handedness. These results confirm that neurological signs associated with VPT birth persist into adulthood.
The pattern of individual neurological signs may suggest links to underlying pathologies. For example, eye movement abnormalities have been reported in association with periventricular leukomalacia and damage to the optic radiation.18 Mirror movements were more common in the VPT group, and are an indication of abnormalities of sensorimotor and interhemispheric interaction. They are a normal finding in young children and disappear with maturation, as well as being associated with genetic conditions (Klippel‐Feil syndrome, X‐linked Kallman syndrome) or occurring as an isolated finding. Mirror movements are also seen after brain damage in early life19 and occur more frequently in left handers.20 The anatomical basis for bilateral motor encoding is still debated and may depend on the aetiology of the mirror movements. Maegaki et al21 studied two individuals with congenital mirror movements and concluded that there is bilateral activation of sensorimotor cortex. Others have proposed the existence of extra ipsilateral corticospinal pathways.22 Still others have proposed that both mechanisms may be acting in the same individuals.19 The corpus callosum has also been implicated,20 the theory being that maturational myelination of the corpus callosum allows transcallosal inhibition of the ipsilateral pathways.
The increase in mirror movements in VPT individuals shown here may thus reflect a delay in neurological maturation. The normal mirror movements of childhood would be expected to disappear by 10 years of age,23 so this would imply a significant motor delay in our VPT 18–19 year olds. If the disappearance of normal mirror movements depends on corpus callosum myelination, it may be that VPT individuals are experiencing a delay in this process. There is considerable evidence that perinatal white matter lesions, in particular periventricular leucomalacia, result in delayed myelination.24,25 Additionally, the corpus callosum has been shown to be both structurally26 and functionally27 abnormal in VPT individuals.
Gaze impersistence, also increased in this VPT group, is another sign that is associated with callosal pathology. Heilman and Adams28 reported the onset of gaze impersistence after callosal transection (for treatment of epileptic seizures) in a patient with a pre‐existing right hemisphere lesion. Bae and Pincus29 found that periventricular white matter damage (in term‐born adults) was associated with abnormalities of visual tracking and with three‐step motor sequencing. Gaze impersistence has also been attributed to disordered CNS maturation and occurs with increased frequency among patients with early onset schizophrenia.30
The VPT group also had increased rates of right‐left (R‐L) confusion, which classically occurs in Gerstmann's syndrome (along with finger agnosia, agraphia, and acalculia) in association with lesions of the dominant angular gyrus.31 R‐L confusion is also, of course, an everyday phenomenon recognised by many people who do not have a neurological condition and is reported to be more common in men and in left handers.32 It is possible that this sign also represents a deficit of interhemispheric information transfer.
We also found an increased rate of neurological signs in the term males compared to term females. This may reflect a general increased susceptibility to neurodevelopmental insult in boys, or that girls are more developmentally robust. There is evidence for a male disadvantage, for example, perinatal mortality for very low birth weight (VLBW) boys is significantly greater than for girls, and surviving boys have a higher risk of adverse outcomes.33,34 Our results did not show a clear difference in neurological outcome between male and female VPT 18 year olds; in fact, both groups were equally impaired. We therefore cannot rule out the possibility that the difference between male and female controls reflects a bias in our term comparison group. Such a bias would be likely to have reduced the chance of finding differences between the two groups. It should also be pointed out that the term‐born comparison group was made up of individuals from two sources: a birth cohort from UCLH and individuals recruited at age 18 from press advertisements.
In this group of VPT young adults, we found associations between neurological dysfunction and gestational age, and a weak association with birth weight. This is consistent with Foulder‐Hughes and Cooke12 who reported weak correlations between childhood neurological abnormality and birth weight and gestational age. Perinatal indicators of hypoxia and acidosis showed no significant associations with neurological abnormalities in any domain. This is surprising, in that hypoxia/ischaemia is often assumed to be the cause of many of the brain lesions associated with preterm birth. It may be that the lesions which cause neurological compromise are those that affect white matter (such as periventricular leukomalacia) and are not adequately described by perinatal Apgar scores or blood pH.
There were strong associations between integrative neurological abnormalities and full scale, verbal, and performance IQ at 18 years of age in the VPT group. This is in agreement with the large body of literature that suggests that neurological dysfunction, even if mild, is associated with reduced academic performance. It suggests that neurological signs, possibly of relatively trivial importance in themselves, are potentially markers of a real cognitive disability. Olsen et al35 found that “minor neurodevelopmental dysfunction” in preterm children was associated with reduced neuropsychological performance. Sullivan and McGrath36 suggested that early motor delay contributes to later cognitive disability and refer to this as “hidden morbidity”. Several studies have found that neurological signs in LBW children are associated with reduced IQ and specific learning disabilities.37,38
Limitations
We found a relatively high rate of neurological deviance in the term control group. However, estimates of rates of neurological signs in the normal adult population vary widely from 26%30 to 90%39 and rates of neurological abnormalities increase with age. In young people there is generally a higher rate of neurological signs, for example Kennard40 reported neurological signs in 60% of a group of 72 normal children. Buchanan and Heinrichs,14 using a very similar rating scale to that used here, found rates of abnormalities very similar to those in our study in a control group of 50 healthy adults.
In comparing the frequencies of individual neurological signs between the groups (table 44),), we have not made a statistical adjustment to compensate for multiple comparisons. It thus remains possible that some of these findings are due to chance, so caution should be used in their interpretation. For example, the difference between left and right sides for signs such as cranial nerve palsy and mirror movements may be indicative of chance effects. However, most individual signs are found to be more frequent in the VPT group, regardless of the level of statistical significance.
Another potential weakness of this study is the reliability of assessments of neurological signs.41 Inter‐rater reliability has been shown to be poor for rare signs, for example those occurring in less than 10% of subjects.13,14 Reliability has been shown in various studies to be lowest for sensory signs,42 eye movements,13 and primitive reflexes (grasp, suck, snout).30 Summing the individual scores, as we have done here, improves their reliability.42
A further limitation of this study is the relatively low follow‐up rate of the VPT group (48%). This drop out rate is a problem common to many long term follow‐up studies12 and may limit the generalisability of our findings. Additionally, the VPT group was 7 months younger than the term group, and it is not clear how much this might have contributed to group differences. It is certainly known that structural brain changes continue into young adulthood and beyond, including progressive changes in relative amounts and distribution of grey and white matter43 and in the size of the corpus callosum.44 However, little is known about changes in neurological signs over this time.
Conclusions
In summary, we find increased neurological signs in young adults born very preterm. The pattern of signs suggests a deficit of sensorimotor and interhemispheric integration. Neurological dysfunction may be in itself mild, but it is strongly associated with reduced neuropsychological performance and may therefore represent a hidden morbidity in individuals born very preterm.
Acknowledgements
Dr Ann Stewart gave much helpful advice in the early stages of the study; Dr Antigone Lebessi performed some of the IQ measurements on the study groups; and Ms Janice Townsend at University College Hospital oversaw the recruitment of the VPT and term groups.
Abbreviations
UCLH - University College Hospital London
VLBW - very low birth weight
VPT - very preterm
Footnotes
Dr Allin is supported by the Peggy Pollak Fellowship in Developmental Psychiatry, administered by the Psychiatry Research Trust
Competing interests: none declared
Approval for this study was obtained from the Joint University College London/University College Hospital Committee on the Ethics of Human Research, and the Joint Medical Ethical Committee of the Institute of Psychiatry. Informed, written consent was obtained from all participants.
1. Banker B Q, Larroche J C. Periventricular leukomalacia of infancy: a form of neonatal anoxic encephalopathy. Arch Neurol 1962. 7386–410.410. [PubMed]
2. Paneth N, Rudelli R, Kazam E. et alBrain damage in the preterm infant. London: Mac Keith Press/Cambridge University Press, 1994.
3. Volpe J. Neurologic outcome of prematurity. Arch Neurol 1998. 55297–300.300. [PubMed]
4. Stewart A L, Rifkin L, Amess P N. et al Brain structure and neurocognitive and behavioural function in adolescents who were born very preterm. Lancet 1999. 3531653–1657.1657. [PubMed]
5. du Plessis A J, Volpe J J. Perinatal brain injury in the preterm and term newborn. Curr Opin Neurol 2002. 15151–157.157. [PubMed]
6. Dunn H G. Sequelae of low birth weight: the Vancouver study. London: Mac Keith Press, 1986.
7. Stewart A L, Costello AM de L, Hamilton P A. et al Relationship between neurodevelopmental status of very preterm infants at one and four years. Dev Med Child Neurol 1989. 31756–765.765. [PubMed]
8. Hadders‐Algra M, Huisjes H J, Touwen B C L. Perinatal risk factors and minor neurological dysfunction: significance for behaviour and school achievement at 9 years. Dev Med Child Neurol 1988. 30482–491.491. [PubMed]
9. Hall A, McLeod A, Counsell C. et al School attainment, cognitive ability and motor function in a total Scottish very‐low‐birthweight population at 8 years: a controlled study. Dev Med Child Neurol 1995. 371037–1050.1050. [PubMed]
10. Calame A, Fawer C L, Anderegg A. et al Interaction between perinatal brain damage and processes of normal development. Dev Neurosci 1985. 71–11.11. [PubMed]
11. Marlow N, Roberts B L, Cooke R W I. Motor skills in extremely low birth weight children at the age of 6 years. Arch Dis Child 1989. 64839–847.847. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Foulder‐Hughes L A, Cooke R WI. Motor, cognitive and behavioural disorders in children born very preterm. Dev Med Child Neurol 2003. 4597–103.103. [PubMed]
13. Griffiths T D, Sigmundsson T, Takei N. et al Neurological abnormalities in familial and sporadic schizophrenia. Brain 1998. 121191–203.203. [PubMed]
14. Buchanan R W, Heinrichs D W. The Neurological Evaluation Scale (NES): a structured instrument for the assessment of neurological signs in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res 1989. 27335–350.350. [PubMed]
15. Wechsler D. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation, 1981.
16. Canavan A G, Dunn G, McMillan T. Principal components of the WAIS‐R. Br J Clin Psychol 1986. 2581–85.85.
17. Taylor H G, Klein N, Munich N M. et al Middle school‐age outcomes in children with very low birth weight. Child Dev 2000. 711495–1511.1511. [PubMed]
18. Jacobson L, Ygge J, Flodmark O. Nystagmus in periventricular leucomalacia. Br J Ophthalmol 1998. 821026–1032.1032. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Balbi P, Trojano L, Ragno M. et al Patterns of motor control reorganization in a patient with mirror movements. Clin Neurophysiol 2000. 111318–325.325. [PubMed]
20. Herzog A G, Durwen H F. Mirror movements. In: Joseph AB, Young RR, eds. Movement disorders in neurology and neuropsychiatry. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 1999.
21. Maegaki Y, Seki A, Suzaki I. et al Congenital mirror movement: a study of functional MRI and transcranial magnetic stimulation. Dev Med Child Neurol 2002. 44838–843.843. [PubMed]
22. Mayston M J, Harrison L M, Stephens J A. A neurophysiological study of mirror movements in adults and children. Ann Neurol 1999. 45583–594.594. [PubMed]
23. Connolly K, Stratton P. Developmental changes in associated movements. Dev Med Child Neurol 1968. 1049–56.56. [PubMed]
24. Back S A, Luo N L, Borenstein N S. et al Late oligodendrocyte progenitors coincide with the developmental window of vulnerability for human perinatal white matter injury. J Neurosci 2001. 211302–1312.1312. [PubMed]
25. Back S A, Han B H, Luo N L. et al Selective vulnerability of late oligodendrocyte progenitors to hypoxia‐ischemia. J Neurosci 2002. 22455–463.463. [PubMed]
26. Nosarti C, Rushe T M, Woodruff P W. et al Corpus callosum size and very preterm birth: relationship to neuropsychological outcome. Brain 2004. 1272080–2089.2089. [PubMed]
27. Santhouse A M, ffytche D H, Howard R J. et al The functional significance of perinatal corpus callosum damage: an fMRI study in young adults. Brain 2002. 1251782–1792.1792. [PubMed]
28. Heilman K M, Adams D J. Callosal neglect. Arch Neurol 2003. 60276–279.279. [PubMed]
29. Bae C J, Pincus J H. Neurologic signs predict periventricular white matter lesions on MRI. Can J Neurol Sci 2004. 31242–247.247. [PubMed]
30. Karp B I, Garvey M, Jacobsen L K. et al Abnormal neurologic maturation in adolescents with early‐onset schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 2001. 158118–122.122. [PubMed]
31. Gold M, Adair J C, Jacobs D H. et al Right‐left confusion in Gerstmann's syndrome: a model of body centered spatial orientation. Cortex 1995. 31267–283.283. [PubMed]
32. Hannay H J, Ciaccia P J, Kerr J W. et al Self‐report of right‐left confusion in college men and women. Percept Mot Skills 1990. 70451–457.457. [PubMed]
33. Lavoie M E, Robaey P, Stauder E A. et al Extreme prematurity in healthy 5‐year‐old children: a re‐analysis of sex effects on event‐related brain activity. Psychophysiology 1998. 35679–689.689. [PubMed]
34. Stevenson D K, Verer J, Fanaroff A A. et al Sex differences in outcomes of very low birthweight infants: the newborn male disadvantage. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2000. 83F182–F185.F185. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Olsen P, Vainionpaa L, Paakko E. et al Psychological findings in preterm children related to neurologic status and magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatrics 1998. 102329–336.336. [PubMed]
36. Sullivan M C, McGrath M M. Perinatal morbidity, mild motor delay, and later school outcomes. Dev Med Child Neurol 2003. 45104–112.112. [PubMed]
37. Hertzig M E. Neurological ‘soft' signs in low‐birthweight children. Dev Med Child Neurol 1981. 23778–791.791. [PubMed]
38. Breslau N, Chilcoat H D, Johnson E O. et al Neurologic soft signs and low birthweight: their association and neuropsychiatric implications. Biol Psychiatry 1999. 4771–79.79. [PubMed]
39. Rossi A, De Cataldo S, Di Michele V. et al Neurological soft signs in schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry 1990. 157735–739.739. [PubMed]
40. Kennard M A. Value of equivocal signs in neurologic diagnosis. Neurology 1960. 10753–764.764. [PubMed]
41. Hansen M, Sindrup S H, Christensen P B. et al Interobserver variation in the evaluation of neurological signs: observer dependent factors. Acta Neurol Scand 1994. 90145–149.149. [PubMed]
42. Pine D S, Scott M R, Busner C. et al Psychometrics of neurological soft signs. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1996. 35509–515.515. [PubMed]
43. Sowell E R, Thompson P M, Tessner K D. et al Mapping continued brain growth and gray matter density reduction in dorsal frontal cortex: inverse relationships during postadolescent brain maturation. J Neurosci 2001. 218819–8829.8829. [PubMed]
44. Giedd J N, Blumenthal J, Jeffries N O. et al Development of the human corpus callosum during childhood and adolescence: a longitudinal MRI study.Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 1999. 23571–588.588. [PubMed]
Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of
BMJ Group