Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of brjcancerBJC HomepageBJC Advance online publicationBJC Current IssueSubmitting an article to BJCWeb feeds
Br J Cancer. 1997; 75(6): 898–902.
PMCID: PMC2063410

Multiattribute utility assessment of outcomes of treatment for head and neck cancer.


Good clinical practice is dependent on continuous audit. Most audits of head and neck cancer treatment planning have been subjective, with only 5-year survival rates being considered objectively. Improvements in clinical care require not only measurable goals that relate to patients' perspectives, but also a means of assessing to what extent those goals have been met. In this context, 5-year survival rates are too crude to be useful, although they remain important for other reasons. Because a simple clinical objective measure of outcome applicable to head and neck cancer is not available, multiattribute assessment techniques were used to develop a clinically based scale for outcomes following treatment for head and neck cancer, with domains centred on social function, pain, physical appearance, eating and speech problems, nausea, donor site problems and shoulder function. Domains were weighted relative to each other; pain (mean weight 85) and social function (89) were considered most important followed by physical appearance (76), eating (76) and speech problems (74) A series of graded statements was constructed within each domain and scaled relative to each other. These components were also combined into an overall scale that will enable objective outcome assessment in this important area of medical care.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (743K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Bjordal K, Ahlner-Elmqvist M, Tollesson E, Jensen AB, Razavi D, Maher EJ, Kaasa S. Development of a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaire module to be used in quality of life assessments in head and neck cancer patients. EORTC Quality of Life Study Group. Acta Oncol. 1994;33(8):879–885. [PubMed]
  • Boyle MH, Torrance GW. Developing multiattribute health indexes. Med Care. 1984 Nov;22(11):1045–1057. [PubMed]
  • Carter WB. Psychology and decision making: modelling health behavior with multiattribute utility theory. J Dent Educ. 1992 Dec;56(12):800–807. [PubMed]
  • Hunt SM, McKenna SP, Williams J. Reliability of a population survey tool for measuring perceived health problems: a study of patients with osteoarthrosis. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1981 Dec;35(4):297–300. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hassan SJ, Weymuller EA., Jr Assessment of quality of life in head and neck cancer patients. Head Neck. 1993 Nov-Dec;15(6):485–496. [PubMed]
  • Schipper H, Clinch J, McMurray A, Levitt M. Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: the Functional Living Index-Cancer: development and validation. J Clin Oncol. 1984 May;2(5):472–483. [PubMed]
  • Selby PJ, Chapman JA, Etazadi-Amoli J, Dalley D, Boyd NF. The development of a method for assessing the quality of life of cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 1984 Jul;50(1):13–22. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Stalpers LJ, Verbeek AL, van Daal WA. Radiotherapy or surgery for T2N0M0 glottic carcinoma? A decision-analytic approach. Radiother Oncol. 1989 Mar;14(3):209–217. [PubMed]
  • Telfer MR, Shepherd JP. Psychological distress in patients attending an oncology clinic after definitive treatment for maxillofacial malignant neoplasia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993 Dec;22(6):347–349. [PubMed]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK