Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Hear Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2007 October 24.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2041888



The outer hair cell (OHC) is a hydrostat with a low hydraulic conductivity of Pf = 3×10−4 cm/s across the plasma membrane (PM) and subsurface cisterna (SSC) that make up the OHC's lateral wall. The SSC is structurally and functionally a transport barrier in normal cells that is known to be disrupted by salicylate. The effect of sodium salicylate on Pf is determined from osmotic experiments in which isolated, control and salicylate-treated OHCs were exposed to hypotonic solutions in a constant flow chamber. The value of Pf = 3.5±0.5 ×10−4 cm/s (mean ± s.e.m, n = 34) for salicylate-treated OHCs was not significantly different from Pf = 2.4±0.3 ×10−4 cm/s (mean ± s.e.m, n = 31) for untreated OHCs (p=.3302). Thus Pf is determined by the PM and is unaffected by salicylate treatment. The ratio of longitudinal strain to radial strain εzc = −0.76 for salicylate-treated OHCs was significantly smaller (p = .0143) from −0.72 for untreated OHCs, and is also independent of the magnitude of the applied osmotic challenge. Salicylate-treated OHCs took longer to attain a steady-state volume which is larger than that for untreated OHCs and increased in volume by 8-15% prior to hypotonic perfusion unlike sodium α-ketoglutarate treated OHCs. It is suggested that depolymerization of cytoskeletal proteins and/or glycogen maybe responsible for the large volume increase in salicylate-treated OHCs as well as the different responses to different modes of application of the hypotonic solution.

Keywords: Hydraulic conductivity, extracisternal space, subsurface cisterna


Outer hair cells (OHCs) are mechanosensitive cells located in the mammalian cochlea. The OHC possesses a hydraulic skeleton, i.e. the OHC wall is supported by a positive intracellular (turgor) pressure which helps to maintain its cylindrical shape (Brownell, 2006; Brownell et al., 2001). The hydraulic skeleton is necessary for electromotility (Brownell, 1990), which was first reported by Brownell et al. (1985). Electromotility is believed to be the basis of the active process within the cochlea proposed by Gold (1948) resulting in the fine frequency selectivity and sensitivity of mammalian hearing (Brownell, 1999; Dallos, 1992; Patuzzi, 1996).

The cell's ability to maintain a positive intracellular pressure may be related to the hydraulic conductivity of the OHC wall. The OHC hydraulic conductivity (Pf), which is a measure of the rate at which water crosses the OHC wall, may be obtained by analyzing OHC shape changes in response to an osmotic challenge. We have analyzed the OHC volume response to a hypotonic solution with an osmotic difference of −45 mOsm and obtained Pf = 3 × 10−4 cm/s for the OHC hydraulic conductivity using a mathematical model of osmotic water transport (Ratnanather et al., 1996b). This value is on the low side of values reported for different lipid bilayers and is 2 orders of magnitude lower than the hydraulic conductivity of red blood cells. The low conductivity may help to maintain the intracellular pressure necessary for cell function.

The low OHC hydraulic conductivity may be attributed to either the plasma membrane (PM) or the other components of the highly specialized lateral wall. Beneath the PM lies a flattened unfenestrated cylindrical sac called the subsurface cisterna (SSC) (Slepecky et al., 1992). In the space between the SSC and PM (defined as the extracisternal space, ECiS) is the cortical lattice that is believed to supply the mechanical reinforcement of the wall (Holley, 1996). The micropillars, which form part of the cortical lattice, extend radially across the ECiS from the SSC to the PM. Water transport into and out of the cell must cross the PM. Water movement inside the cell may be across the SSC or exclusively within the ECiS moving towards the basal and apical ends.

In addition, we have used data from OHC shape changes in response to osmotic challenge of different magnitudes (−17, −30 and −45 mOsm) to assess the mechanical properties of the OHC (Ratnanather et al., 1996a). The ratio of the longitudinal strain to the circumferential strain was found to be −0.72 and independent of the magnitude of the osmotic challenge, and was used by Spector et al. (1998) along with other data to estimate the in-plane and bending stiffnesses of the OHC wall.

Salicylate, which is a by-product of aspirin metabolism, is known to result in reversibly elevated threshold of hearing, decreased speech discrimination, tinnitus and altered cochlear function (Mongan et al., 1973; Myers et al., 1965; Stypulkowski, 1990). The effect of salicylate on biomechanical properties of the OHC has been the focus of several studies as summarized in table 1 of Snyder et al. (2003); see also Brownell (2006). Briefly, sodium salicylate permeates the OHC presumably in the uncharged form of salicylic acid and then dissociates to acidify the cell cytoplasm with about 0.6 μM in the undissociated form (Kakehata et al., 1996; Tunstall et al., 1995). One notable effect of salicylate (at 10 mM concentration levels) on OHCs is the reversible disruption of the SSC (Dieler et al., 1991) together with reduction in turgor pressure (Shehata et al., 1991), longitudinal stiffness (Russell et al., 1995) and active force generation (Hallworth, 1997), suggesting that the OHC is a likely target of salicylate ototoxicity.

Thus we examine the effect of salicylate on both the hydraulic conductivity and mechanical properties of the OHC. In this paper, we analyzed the response of salicylate-treated OHCs to osmotic challenges of different magnitudes and calculated the rate of water flow into the cell. Then we compared these rates with those obtained by analyzing those for untreated OHCs. We also analyzed the longitudinal and circumferential strains of salicylate-treated OHCs and compared them with the previously reported strains for untreated OHCs.


A complete description of the experimental method may be found in Chertoff and Brownell (1994) and Ratnanather et al. (1996a; 1996b). A brief summary follows.

OHC isolation

200-300g pigmented guinea pigs were sedated in a 100% carbon dioxide chamber and decapitated. Temporal bones were removed from the skull and the bulla opened to expose the cochleae, which were then placed into standard medium (solution 1, see below). The OHCs were isolated from the cochlea using standard techniques. The OHCs were gathered in 1 ml syringe, injected into a rectangular chamber (Chertoff et al., 1994), which was placed onto the stage of an inverted microscope (Zeiss Axiovert 35) and allowed to settle to the bottom of the chamber. An oil immersion 63 X objective lens (NA 1.4) was used to image the cell. The cell was monitored on a television screen (final magnification 1500 X) and recorded on tape with a video cassette recorder (Panasonic AG-1830, S-VHS). Time and date were imposed on the video image with a time-date generator (Panasonic WJ-810).


We used the following solutions. Isotonicity was defined as a final osmolarity of 293-297 mOsm. Hypotonicity was defined as a solution which differed from the isotonic solution by ΔC = −17, −30 and −45 mOsm (Ratnanather et al., 1996a) and was made by diluting the isotonic solution with distilled water. Four types of solutions were made: phosphate buffered saline (PBS), salicylate, salt and ketoglutarate.

  1. Isotonic-PBS solution (Delbeco's) supplemented with 1.5 mM CaCl2, 1.5 mM MgCl2 and 10 mM D-glucose;
  2. Hypotonic-PBS solution which differed in osmolarity from solution 1;
  3. Isotonic-salicylate solution (solution 1 + 10 mM sodium salicylate + distilled water to maintain isotonicity);
  4. Hypotonic-salicylate solution which differed in osmolarity from solution 3;
  5. Isotonic-salt solution (solution 1 + 10 mM NaCl + distilled water);
  6. Hypotonic-salt solution which differed in osmolarity from solution 5;
  7. Isotonic-ketoglutarate solution (solution 1 + 10 mM sodium α-ketoglutarate + distilled water);
  8. Hypotonic-ketoglutarate solution which differed in osmolarity from solution 7.

All solutions were adjusted with HCl or NaOH to a final pH value of 7.3-7.4 at room temperature. The osmolarity of each solution was measured by placing a 2 ml sample in a freezing point osmometer (Osmette A). Ketoglutarate was used as a control for salicylate because it has a similar molecular weight (Shehata et al., 1991).

Experimental procedure

After the cell attached to the bottom of the chamber, it was perfused at a rate of 247 μl/min with solutions in the following sequence:

  • untreated cells: 15 min. with isotonic-PBS (solution 1) followed by 15 min. with hypotonic-PBS (solution 2) followed by 15 min. with isotonic-PBS.
  • treated cells: there were two treatments - salicylate and α-ketoglutarate. The first treatment involved exposure for 30 min. to isotonic-salicylate (solution 3) followed by 15 min. with hypotonic-salicylate (solution 4) followed by 30 min. with isotonic-salt (solution 5) followed by 15 min. with hypotonic-salt (solution 6). The ketoglutarate treatment used isotonic-and hypotonic-ketoglutarate (solution 7 and 8) instead of the corresponding salicylate solutions.

Data analysis

A detailed morphometric analysis was used to measure the spatial changes in response to the hypotonic challenge. Since the video images were recorded continuously, the spatial information about the cells could be obtained at any time during the experiment. This analysis assumed that the cross-section of the cell remained circular throughout the experiment (Chertoff et al., 1994). There was a dead time of about 3 min. for the perfusate to reach the cell (Chertoff et al., 1994; Ratnanather et al., 1996a; Ratnanather et al., 1996b). Video images were digitized at intervals (see for example the error bars in fig. 1c). At each time, the outline of the cell was traced 4-5 times and the pixel coordinates of the outline of the OHC were collected using the image analysis software SEMPER (Synoptics, Cambridge, MA). The resulting pixel files were then analyzed using a set of programs written in MATLAB (The Mathworks, Natick, MA). From the MATLAB analysis, the temporal changes in radius, length and volume were obtained.

Fig. 1
Relative volume change averaged from salicylate-treated OHCs (—) and compared with untreated OHCs (- - -). Volume change has been normalized with respect to volume at start of hypotonic perfusion at 2010 s. a) ΔC = −17 mOsm (treated, ...

The care and use of animals reported on this study were approved by the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol number GP2M334).


Fig. 1 shows the averaged change in volume for a population of salicylate-treated OHCs that were exposed to hypotonic solutions of concentrations ΔC = −17, −30 and −45 mOsm. The change in volume was normalized with respect to the time when the cells began to respond to the hypotonic solution at 2010 s (i.e. 210 s after the start of perfusion of the hypotonic solution). Superimposed on each graph is the response of untreated OHCs to hypotonic solutions; the ΔC = −45 mOsm data for untreated OHCs was previously reported (Ratnanather et al., 1996b).

For ΔC = −17 mOsm, the initial length of 10 salicylate-treated cells varied from 61 to 80 μm with a mean of 72±2 μm and that of 9 untreated cells varied from from 27 to 74 μm with a mean of 56±6 μm; for ΔC = −30 mOsm the initial length of 8 salicylate-treated cells varied from 44 to 77 μm with a mean of 65±5 μm and that of 10 untreated cells varied from from 28 to 78 μm with a mean of 60±5 μm; for ΔC = −45 mOsm, the initial length of 13 salicylate-treated cells varied from 45 to 78 μm with a mean of 63±3 μm and that of 15 untreated cells varied from from 37 to 79 μm with a mean of 60±3 μm. The initial length for untreated cells is slightly different from that reported in Ratnanather et al. (1996b) because a different reference point was used.

We have previously shown that osmotic induced OHC volume change can be described by (Ratnanather et al., 1996b):

equation M1

where V is the OHC volume, V0 is the initial OHC volume at the start of the hypotonic perfusion, and a and b are constants. For small t, the right hand side of Eq. 1 can be expressed as abt. Thus ab is the initial rate of normalized change in OHC volume and may be used to determine the hydraulic conductivity of the OHC wall, Pf (Ratnanather et al., 1996b):

equation M2


equation M3

where r0 is the initial OHC radius and Vw = 18×10−6 m3/mol is the molar volume of water. We included the ΔC = −45 mOsm untreated data from Ratnanather et al. (1996) for comparison.

Eq. 3 describes a linear relationship between the initial rate of normalized change in OHC volume and the magnitude of the applied osmotic challenge. The product ab for each cell is determined from an exponential fitting procedure based on the Nelder-Meade simplex algorithm (MATLAB). To test the linear relationship, the flux, 50roab/Vw, in response to ΔC was analyzed using parametric tests, non-parametric tests and a linear model.

Brown-Forsythe tests of homogeneity of variances (HOV) (Manly, 1994) indicated that variances of fluxes between concentration levels within untreated and treated sets were not significantly different (p=.2169 and p=.9071, respectively). Hence, the variation in flux was not affected by ΔC for both treated and untreated data. Nevertheless, nonparametric tests were appropriate since normality failed for at least one group. For example, fluxes for untreated OHCs at ΔC = −17, and treated OHCs at ΔC = −17 and −30 were significantly non-normal (p=.0120, p=.0341, and p=.0095, respectively) based on Lilliefor's test (Thode Jr., 2002). Therefore, Kruskal-Wallis test (Zar, 1984) for multi-group comparisons and Wilcoxon rank sum test (Zar, 1984) with Holm's correction (Holm, 1979) for pairwise comparisons were used. There were group differences within the untreated set (p=.0002).

Pairwise comparisons of fluxes for ΔC levels were performed. Fluxes at ΔC = −17 were significantly less than those at ΔC = −30 (p=.0028), those at ΔC = −17 were significantly less than those at ΔC = −45 (p≤.0001), and those at ΔC = −30 were significantly less than those at ΔC = −45 (p=.0204). There was no evidence of group differences within the treated set (p=.1709) and thus no need for pairwise comparisons. Fluxes at ΔC = −17 were almost (or marginally) significantly less than those at δC = −45 level (p=.0876). Furthermore, when ΔC levels were ignored, the comparison of the untreated and treated groups by Wilcoxon rank sum test yielded no significant difference (p=.6382). Likewise for comparison of treated versus untreated data at concentration levels ΔC = −30 and ΔC = −45 (p=.4013 and p=.3814, respectively), but untreated fluxes were significantly less than treated fluxes at ΔC = −17 (p=.0330). Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests for cumulative distribution functions (cdfs) (Zar, 1984) for untreated OHCs at ΔC = −45 were significantly smaller than those for ΔC = −30, whose cdfs were significantly smaller than those for ΔC = −17 (p=.0128, p=.0016, respectively); thus cdf at ΔC = −45 was significantly smaller than that at ΔC = −17 (p=.0030). In other words, it was more likely for fluxes at ΔC = −45 to be larger than those at ΔC = −30 whose fluxes were more likely to be larger than those at ΔC = −17 as might be expected from Eq. 3.

The linear model described by Eq. 3 was fitted using regression. Note that Eq. 3 implies that (i) concentration levels should be considered as numerical measurements, rather than factors (or categories) and (ii) the y-intercept is zero. First, we checked whether considering the concentration levels as factors would have gained any power in the statistical analysis. So, we ran two models, one with ΔC as factors, and one with ΔC as numbers. In both cases, the residuals of the fitted models were significantly non-normal (Shapiro-Wilks test), but removing a few outliers resolved this issue, thereby yielding insignificant departure from normality in each model. Then, for untreated OHCs, using ANOVA F-test (Zar, 1984), there was no significant improvement in considering concentration levels as categories compared to assuming them as numerical (p=.3908); similarly, for treated OHCs, p=.5691. Therefore, for both treated and untreated data, we assumed the concentration levels to be numerical. For untreated data, the y-intercept was estimated as −.0027 (with s.e. = 0.0023) which was not significantly different from 0 (p=0.2340); for treated data, the estimated y-intercept was 0.0026 (s.e.= 0.0024) which was not significantly different from 0 also (p= 0.2856).

Thus the estimated model based on Eq 3. yielded Pf = 2.6×10−4 cm/s and 2.4×10−4 cm/s for untreated and treated OHCs (adjusted R2 =.8141 and .7692) respectively. To test for difference, we use ANCOVA methods (Zar, 1984) for the following model

equation M4

where Iut is the indicator function (1 if untreated, 0 if treated) and β1 is Pf for treated group, while β1 + β2 is for untreated group; μ1 is the mean influence due to existence of treatment and μ1 + μ2 is when there is no treatment, and ε is the error term. So if β2 = 0 then, the two lines should be identical, i.e. Pf should be the same for both treated and untreated groups. Similarly if μ2 = 0 , there should be no mean influence difference between treatment or no treatment. There was no interaction between ΔC and treatment (p=.0863), i.e., no slope difference (or β2 = 0 ) thus interaction was removed from the model. There were significant differences at concentration levels (p < 0.0001) but no significance with respect to treated or untreated labels (p=.9963). Thus the lines in Fig. 2 are parallel with no significant separation, reducing the model to 50abr0 /VW = PfΔC + ε . Linear regression yielded Pf =2.5 ×10−4 cm/s for the common slope for treated and untreated data with adjusted R2 = 0.7968.

Fig. 2
Linear relationship between initial rate of change in OHC volume, 50abr0/Vw, and magnitude of osmotic challenge, ΔC. ab and r0 are obtained from exponential fitting of OHC volume change in response to hypotonic solution and the initial radius ...

An alternative calculation of Pf is to use Eq. 2 for each individual cell. Lilliefor's test for normality suggested that the ΔC = −17 untreated set and ΔC = −30 treated set were significantly non-normal (p=.0183 and p=.0024, respectively). Hence, non-parametric tests were more appropriate although Brown-Forsythe tests for HOV suggested that variances of treatment groups within untreated and also within treated sets were not significantly different (p=.9691 and p=.1502, respectively). There was evidence of significant group differences within untreated OHCs (by Kruskal-Wallis tests, p=.0170) but not for treated OHCs (p=.4694). Untreated OHCs at ΔC =−17 are not significantly different from those at ΔC =−30 (p=.1070), which are not significantly different from those at ΔC =−45 (p=.2609). But, untreated OHCs at ΔC =−17 were significantly less than those at ΔC =−45 (p=.0134). There was no overall differences between treated and untreated OHCs when treatment levels were ignored (Wilcoxon rank signed sum test, p=.3302). Additionally, treated and untreated OHCs were not significantly different at each concentration levels (p=.1605 at ΔC =−17, p=.7618 at ΔC =−30, and p=.5474 at ΔC =−45).

Further Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests for cdfs showed no significant differences in the distributions of Pf values for untreated and treated OHCs, although cdf of OHCs at ΔC = −17 was larger than that at ΔC = −45 with marginal significance (p=.0522). Thus for untreated OHCs, Pf = 2.9±0.1 ×10−4 cm/s (mean ± s.e.m., ΔC = −45 mOsm, n = 15), Pf = 2.5±0.5×10−4 cm/s (ΔC = −30 mOsm, n = 10), Pf = 1.5±0.6 ×10−4 cm/s (ΔC = −17 mOsm, n = 9). For salicylate-treated OHCs, Pf = 2.4±0.4 ×10−4 cm/s (ΔC = −45 mOsm, n = 13), Pf = 3.6±1.2 ×10−4 cm/s (ΔC = −30 mOsm, n = 8), Pf = 4.7±1.2 ×10−4 cm/s (ΔC = −17 mOsm, n = 10). Combining the data, Pf = 3.5±0.5 ×10−4 cm/s (n = 34) and Pf =2.4 ±0.3 ×10−4 cm/s (n = 31) for untreated and salicylate-treated OHCs respectively, giving an overall value of Pf =2.9±0.3 ×10−4 cm/s (n = 65).

Fig. 3 shows that ketoglutarate-treated OHCs (n=9) did not increase in volume prior to perfusion of hypotonic solutions. We also obtained Pf = 3.7±2.9 ×10−4 cm/s (ΔC = −45 mOsm, n = 4).

Fig. 3
Relative volume change averaged from cells perfused with isotonic sodium α-ketoglutarate (n=9) prior to exchange of solutions from isotonic to hypotonic at 1800s. Error bars in s.e.m.

Fig. 4 shows the adjusted volume response to hypotonic perfusion obtained by subtracting the linear fit of the response up to the start of the hypotonic perfusion. When we analyzed the modified response of the salicylate-treated OHCs, statistical analysis showed that HOV was not violated (p=.2875), but not normality (p=.0146 for ΔC = −30). Still there was no difference between the three groups (Kruskal-Wallis, p=.6615). Thus Pf = 2.6±0.5 ×10−4 cm/s (ΔC = −45 mOsm, n = 13), Pf = 3.3±1.2 ×10−4 cm/s (ΔC = −30 mOsm, n = 8), Pf = 4.3±1.1 ×10−4 cm/s (ΔC = −17 mOsm, n = 10), giving an overall mean of Pf = 4.3±0.6 ×10−4 cm/s (n=31). Both fig. 1 and fig. 4 show that the averaged response of salicylate-treated OHCs did not reach a steady state by 15 min. of hypotonic perfusion unlike untreated OHCs. Fig. 5 shows that averaged modified response of salicylate-treated OHCs (ΔC = −45 mOsm, n = 7) attained a steady state after 30 min. of hypotonic perfusion.

Fig. 4
Averaged volume response to hypotonic perfusion modified by subtracting the linear volume response prior to hypotonic perfusion of solutions with ΔC = −45 mOsm (—, n = 9), −30 mOsm (---, n = 6) and -17 mOsm ((...), ...
Fig. 5
Modified averaged volume response to hypotonic perfusion for 30 min. for ΔC = −45 mOsm (n=7).

For an OHC of length, l0, and radius, r0, in the reference state (at the start of hypotonic perfusion), the OHC deformation can be characterized by longitudinal and circumferential strains, εz = (ll0) / l0 and εc = (rr0 ) / r0, respectively where l and r are the length and radius of the OHC in the deformed state. Following Ratnanather et al. (1996a), the strains for each treated cell,εz and εc, were calculated at the data points indicated by the error bars in fig. 1c and then averaged. Fig. 6 combined these averaged values in response to the three hypotonic solutions. Lilliefor's tests indicated problems with normality in εz and εc values so non-parametric tests were used although Brown-Forsythe tests for HOV were not rejected. Kruskal-Wallis tests indicated no differences between concentrations for εc (p=.4439) and εz (p=.5645). Overall, Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that εc > −εz (p<.0001). Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests showed no differences in cdfs of εz and εc at each concentration for both groups. Finally, linear regression analysis gave a slope of εz/εc = −0.79 (R2 = 0.98); however, since the residuals were significantly autocorrelated, an autoregression model of order 1 (Box et al., 1994) yielded εz/εc = −0.76. This slope was significantly different from −0.72 for untreated OHCs obtained by Ratnanather et al. (1996a) with p=.0174 (Zar, 1984).

Fig. 6
Plot of εz against εz for salicylate-treated OHCs. Linear regression of the solid line (—) through the origin gave a slope of −0.76. Also shown is the dashed line for untreated OHCs with slope of −0.72 (--, Ratnanather ...


The aim of the present study was to determine the hydraulic conductivity and the mechanical properties of the lateral wall of salicylate-treated OHCs by examining their response to hypotonic solutions. The OHC hydraulic conductivity, Pf = 3×10−4 cm/s, was unaffected by salicylate (Fig. 2). Salicylate-treated OHCs were more elongated and narrower than untreated OHCs yielding εzc = −0.76 (Fig. 6). Both values were found to be independent of the size of the osmotic challenge. Salicylate-treated OHCs took longer to attain a steady-state volume which is larger than that for untreated OHCs (Figs. (Figs.1,1, ,4,4, ,5)5) and increased in volume by 8-15% prior to hypotonic perfusion (Fig. 1) unlike sodium α-ketoglutarate treated OHCs (Fig. 3). The implications of these findings are discussed below.

Plasma membrane dominates resistance to water movement across OHC lateral wall

Although the nature of water movement across the OHC lateral wall has not been determined, water is likely to move through the PM and into the cell core via either the extracisternal space (ECiS) pathway or across the SSC or both. If the hydraulic conductivities of the PM, SSC and ECiS are given by PPM, PSSC and PECiS respectively, then the hydraulic conductivity of the OHC wall is (cf. Krylov et al., 2001):

equation M5

Since the SSC is a flattened unfenestrated cylindrical sac beneath the PM, it can be regarded as a double-layered membraneous system which probably does not possess water channels. This suggests that the SSC is relatively impermeable to water compared to the PM. Using this first approximation, Ratnanather et al. (2000) used a hydrodynamic model of the ECiS to show that PECiS is several orders of magnitude larger than those for lipid bilayers and biological membranes. Thus from Eq. 5, PfPPM suggesting that the resistance to water movement across the OHC lateral wall is dominated by the PM and is not affected by salicylate.

SSC disruption affects osmolyte generation and regulation in salicylate-treated OHCs

The volume increase prior to hypotonic perfusion is probably caused by intracellular osmolytes which both do not affect Pf even after factoring out preperfusion effects and influence the long-time response as predicted (Ratnanather et al., 1996b). Treated OHCs, when adjusted, showed a volume change plateau but with a longer time course (fig 5). Despite having similar molecular weight as salicylate, sodium α-ketoglutarate contains 2 charged carboxyl groups which lack salicylate's aromatic character, making it impermeant to biological membranes absent specific transporters. Since sodium α-ketoglutarate does not disrupt the SSC (Dieler et al., 1991), it is a useful control that does not generate intracellular osmolytes prior to hypotonic perfusion.

The large volume increase during hypotonic perfusion suggests that intracellular osmolytes may be caused by depolymerization of cytoskeletal filaments and glycogen. The dilation and fenestration of the SSC (Dieler et al., 1991; Pollice et al., 1993) results in a change of the nanoenvironment of the ECiS. The efficiency of membrane associated small GTPases that regulate the polymerization of cytoskeletal proteins will thus be affected (for discussion see Brownell, 2006; Kakehata et al., 2000). A plausible outcome is that the one or more of the long chain cytoskeletal proteins in the cortical lattice will depolymerize increasing the osmolarity of the cytoplasm. In addition, glycogen concentrations in the OHC are greater than in liver cells. Glucose-6-phosphatase is found in the SSC (Brownell, 1982) and plays a role in glycogenlysis. The depolymerization of glycogen could also contribute to an increase in cytoplasmic osmolarity.

Passive and jet flows result in different mechanisms of osmotic-induced water transport

A wide range of Pf values for OHCs (Belyantseva et al., 2000; Morimoto et al., 2002; Ratnanather et al., 1996b) reflects different mechanisms of osmotic-induced water transport across the PM. Belyantseva et al. (2000) obtained values of Pf =9.7×10−3 cm/s (adult rats) and Pf =11.1×10−3 (adult guinea pigs) with puff pipettes of radius R=0.5-1 μm placed at a distance of H=25-30 μm applying an osmotic challenge of ΔC= −5mOsm for 20s. Appendix A.1 reevaluated data by Morimoto et al. (2002) in the range 1.5-2×10−3 cm/s for untreated and salicylate-treated OHCs with R=2.5 μm, H=10 μm and ΔC= −45mOsm for 20-25s. Following the discovery that the motor mechanism underlying OHC electromotility involves the membrane protein prestin which is a member of the SLC26 family of anion transporter proteins (Zheng et al., 2000), Chambard and Ashmore (2003) obtained Pf=2×10−4 cm/s from prestin-transfected HEK-293 cells with R=0.5-1 μm, H=100-200 μm and ΔC=−5mOsm for 200s.

These differences may be explained by a model of a viscous jet impinging on a planar wall (Davis, Ceritoglu and Ratnanather, in preparation) which suggests that the wall pressure and wall shear stress away from the point of impact is influenced by H/R. When H/R=100-400 in Chambard and Ashmore (2003), the flow near the OHC lateral wall is similar to a constant pressure-gradient flow in a channel in this study. In contrast, when H/R = 4-60 in Belyantseva et al. (2000) and Morimoto et al. (2002), the wall pressure and wall shear stress changes rapidly within a concentrated region of about 3R. Indeed, Morimoto et al. (2002) suggested that such strain-dependent osmotic water transport may occur via selective mechano-sensitive pores observed in the membrane of the OHC (Le Grimellec et al., 2002). Aside, Belyansteva et al. (2000) suggested that low Pf values were caused by a regulatory volume decrease (RVD) mechanism (Crist et al., 1993) which is not possible since Pf is independent of osmolytes that might be generated by RVD (Ratnanather et al., 1996b). Although the density of prestin in OHC is much higher than in transfected cells, the similar modes of perfusion gave similar conductivities suggesting that dominant water pathway is across the PM.

Passive and jet flows result in different mechanical properties of the cortical lattice

Fig. 6 suggests a mechanical origin for the strains. εzc, is −0.76 for salicylate-treated OHCs in contrast with −0.72 for untreated OHCs (Ratnanather et al., 1996a). The steeper slope may reflect the contribution of the SSC to the OHC's longitudinal stiffness. The contribution that the intact SSC makes to the longitudinal stiffness could be removed by its disruption by salicylate. The longitudinal stiffness γa of a typical OHC of radius r0 and length l0 is πr0 (2+εzc)(2 −ν1)Czz/2l0 where ν1 is the Poisson ratio that corresponds to the lateral deformations in the circumferential direction and Czz is the in-plane longitudinal stiffness (Spector et al., 1998). For salicylate-treated OHCs, 2 +εzc is reduced. According to Spector et al. (1998), Czz is a monotonic decreasing function of γa and ν1 is a monotonic increasing function of γa ; also for fixed γa , both ν1 and Czz decrease with respect to Ks that is the stiffness parameter determined from the micropipette aspiration experiment. Lue and Brownell (1999) showed that Ks is reduced with 10 mM salicylate probably via its effect on the SSC-cortical lattice complex which contributes to 80% to Ks (Oghalai et al., 1998). Hallworth (1997) found that the compliance 1/γa was reduced with 10mM salicylate but it did not change much with 5mM salicylate in contrast with reduced γa observed by Russell and Schauz (1995); the discrepancy data maybe due to different modes of delivery of the drug (Hallworth, 1997). Further, the little change in stiffness observed by Hallworth (1997) is consistent with the results of Ermilov et al. (2005) that suggest that 10mM salicylate has less effect on the mechanics of the PM than on competing with the anions involved in electromotility. Thus the principal contributions to the longitudinal stiffness may be affected by the different competing and possibly dose-dependent changes in εzc, ν1 and Czz related to SSC disruption.

Analysis of data from Morimoto et al. (2002) in Appendix A.2 showed that when subject to a puff pipette, untreated and salicylate treated OHCs yielded εzc = −0.58 and −0.45 respectively. These values are different from −0.76 and −0.72 obtained in this study and in Ratnanather et al. (1996a) (p<<0.0001) suggesting that the opposite effect on εzc may be due to the different mechanical stimulus acting on the PM mentioned above. The undulating PM may be characterized as having an outer leaflet and inner leaflet (Raphael et al., 2000). After permeating the PM and acting as a competitive antagonist at the anion-binding site (Oliver et al., 2001), salicylate intercalates the outer leaflet causing outward membrane bending and thus differential membrane tension (Morimoto et al., 2002) while reducing membrane mechanical stiffness (Raphael et al., 1999; Zhou et al., 2005). These changes may be correlated with those in εzc, ν1 and Czz due to a resultant effect from competing differential tensions caused by the formation of the mechano-selective pores (Brownell et al., 1994), opening and closing of transporters (Brownell, 2002), salicylate-induced membrane crenation (Morimoto et al., 2002), stretch-activated channels (Ding et al., 1991; Iwasa et al., 1991; Rybalchenko et al., 2003; Spector et al., 2005) or increase in spontaneously formed meta-stable water defects (Marrink et al., 2001).

The differences in mechanical properties due to the passive and jet flows suggest greater depolymerization of the roughly longitudinally-oriented spectrin and the circumferentially-oriented actin respectively. Further these differences are consistent with permeability changes that allow calcium into the ECiS which would interfere with the homeostasis of long chain cytoskeletal proteins of the cortical lattice but in a manner different from SSC disruption by the membrane associated small GTPases.

Loss of turgor pressure does not affect OHC hydraulic conductivity

Although it has not been observed in electrophysiological experiments, a small volume increase may be associated with loss of turgor pressure in salicylate-treated OHCs and would be much smaller than that observed in this study. The rapid action of salicylate on prestin may reduce the transmembrane induced membrane tension (Ermilov et al., 2005), thus allowing turgor pressure to dissipate via elongation and the apparent volume increase. Alternatively, if PM folding is maintained in part by voltage-induced high curvature and salicylate causes a reduction in curvature then the cell elongates and less of the cell volume is “hidden” in the folding. Since wall pressure difference does not affect Pf (Ratnanather et al., 1996b), referencing to the start of hypotonic perfusion ensures that loss of turgor pressure does not affect the OHC's hydraulic conductivity.


OHC hydraulic conductivity is unaffected by salicylate but salicylate-treated OHCs are more elongated and narrower than untreated OHCs. The biophysical basis for the large salicylate-induced volume change may be the result of the depolymerization of cytoskeletal proteins and/or glycogen but further experiments, well beyond the original intent of this study, are required to test these hypotheses.


We appreciate the constructive comments provided by the reviewers that helped to improve this paper. We thank Ipsita Ghoshtagore, Clara Lee, Aaron Brownell, Erik DeLue and Jennifer Eggers for assisting in the data acquisition, Dr. Noriko Morimoto for her data, Drs. Robert Raphael and Alexander Spector for comments. Much of the work reported here was conducted from 1993 to 1998 and supported by NIH-NIDCD grants R01-DC00354 and R01-DC02775 (WEB/ASP, supplement to JTR), a Deafness Research Foundation grant (JTR), a fellowship (JTR) from the Program in Mathematics and Molecular Biology at the University of California Berkeley supported by NSF DMS-9406348.


In this appendix, we obtained estimates of Pf in cm/s units and of εzc from Morimoto et al. (2002) which subjected untreated and treated OHCs to an osmotic challenge via a puff pipette.

A.1 Hydraulic conductivity

Data was taken at intervals of 5s from t=0 to 25s. For each cell, the reference time at which the volume started to increase was noted (generally at t=0, or 5 or 10s). Linear fitting of the volume increase was used. Since the concentration of the solutions were not noted, it was assumed that ΔC =−35 or −45 mOsm. For untreated OHCs, Pf = 1.6±0.1–2.0±0.1 (×10−3) cm/s (mean ± s.e.m., n=9); for salicylate-treated OHCs, Pf = 1.4±0.1–1.8±0.1 (×10−3) cm/s (n=8) which is higher than that derived from Morimoto et al. (2002) when converted by a factor of 100RT/Vw.

A.2 Ratio of longitudinal strain to radial strain

For each group, the strains in radius and length at t=0,5,10,15,20,25s were averaged. Regression through the origin (Student's t-test, Zar, 1984, p. 284) yielded values of εzc = −0.58 (R2 = 0.99), −0.45 (R2 = 0.99) respectively for untreated and salicylate-treated OHCs which are significantly different (p < 0.0001) (Zar, 1984, p. 300) but not the same as −0.72 or −0.76 (p < 0.0001).


Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.


  • Belyantseva IA, Frolenkov GI, Wade JB, Mammano F, Kachar B. Water permeability of cochlear outer hair cells: characterization and relationship to electromotility. J Neurosci. 2000;20:8996–9003. [PubMed]
  • Box GEP, Jenkins GM, Reinsel GC. Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. 3rd ed. Holden-Day; 1994.
  • Brownell WE. Cochlear transduction: an integrative model and review. Hear Res. 1982;6:335–60. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Brownell WE. Outer hair cell electromotility and otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear. 1990;11:82–92. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Brownell WE. How the ear works - nature's solutions for listening. Volta Review. 1999;99:9–28. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Brownell WE. On the origins of outer hair cell electromotility. In: Berlin CI, Hood LJ, Ricci AJ, editors. Inner Ear Biology: Basic Science and Clinical Applications. Delmar/Thomson Learning; Albany, N.Y.: 2002. pp. 25–47.
  • Brownell WE. The piezoelectric outer hair cell. In: Eatock RA, editor. Vertebrate Hair Cells. Springer; New York: 2006.
  • Brownell WE, Bader CR, Bertrand D, de Ribaupierre Y. Evoked mechanical responses of isolated cochlear outer hair cells. Science. 1985;227:194–6. [PubMed]
  • Brownell WE, Spector AA, Raphael RM, Popel AS. Micro- and nanomechanics of the cochlear outer hair cell. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2001;3:169–94. [PubMed]
  • Brownell WE, Ratnanather JT, Popel AS, Zhi M, Sit PS. Labyrinthine lateral walls: Cochlear outer hair cell permeability and mechanics. In: Flock A, Ottoson D, Ulfendahl M, editors. Active Hearing. Elsevier Science; Amsterdam: 1994. pp. 167–179.
  • Chambard JM, Ashmore JF. Sugar transport by mammalian members of the SLC26 superfamily of anion-bicarbonate exchangers. J Physiol. 2003;550:667–77. [PubMed]
  • Chertoff ME, Brownell WE. Characterization of cochlear outer hair cell turgor. Am J Physiol. 1994;266:C467–79. [PubMed]
  • Crist JR, Fallon M, Bobbin RP. Volume regulation in cochlear outer hair cells. Hear Res. 1993;69:194–8. [PubMed]
  • Dallos P. The active cochlea. J Neurosci. 1992;12:4575–85. [PubMed]
  • Dieler R, Shehata-Dieler WE, Brownell WE. Concomitant salicylate-induced alterations of outer hair cell subsurface cisternae and electromotility. J Neurocytol. 1991;20:637–53. [PubMed]
  • Ding JP, Salvi RJ, Sachs F. Stretch-activated ion channels in guinea pig outer hair cells. Hear Res. 1991;56:19–28. [PubMed]
  • Ermilov SA, Murdock DR, El-Daye D, Brownell WE, Anvari B. Effects of salicylate on plasma membrane mechanics. J. Neurophysiol. 2005;94:2105–10. [PubMed]
  • Gold T. The physical basis of the action of the cochlea. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1948;135:492–498.
  • Hallworth R. Modulation of outer hair cell compliance and force by agents that affect hearing. Hear Res. 1997;114:204–12. [PubMed]
  • Holley MC. Outer hair cell motility. In: Dallos P, Popper AN, Fay RR, editors. The Cochlea. Springer-Verlag; New York: 1996. pp. 386–434.
  • Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics. 1979;6:65.
  • Iwasa KH, Li MX, Jia M, Kachar B. Stretch sensitivity of the lateral wall of the auditory outer hair cell from the guinea pig. Neurosci Lett. 1991;133:171–174. [PubMed]
  • Kakehata S, Santos-Sacchi J. Effects of salicylate and lanthanides on outer hair cell motility and associated gating charge. J Neurosci. 1996;16:4881–9. [PubMed]
  • Kakehata S, Dallos P, Brownell WE, Iwasa KH, Kachar B, Kalinec F, Ikeda K, Takasaka T. Current concept of outer hair cell motility. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2000;27:349–55. [PubMed]
  • Krylov AV, Pohl P, Zeidel ML, Hill WG. Water permeability of asymmetric planar lipid bilayers: leaflets of different composition offer independent and additive resistances to permeation. J. Gen. Physiol. 2001;118:333–340. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Le Grimellec C, Giocondi MC, Lenoir M, Vater M, Sposito G, Pujol R. High-resolution three-dimensional imaging of the lateral plasma membrane of cochlear outer hair cells by atomic force microscopy. J Comp Neurol. 2002;451:62–9. [PubMed]
  • Lue AJ, Brownell WE. Salicylate induced changes in outer hair cell lateral wall stiffness. Hear Res. 1999;135:163–8. [PubMed]
  • Manly B. Multivariate Statistical Methods: A Primer. 2nd ed. Chapman & Hall; 1994.
  • Marrink SJ, Lindahl E, Edholm O, Mark AE. Simulation of the spontaneous aggregation of phospholipids into bilayers. J Am Chem Soc. 2001;123:8638–9. [PubMed]
  • Mongan E, Kelly P, Nies K, Porter WW, Paulus HE. Tinnitus as an indication of therapeutic serum salicylate levels. JAMA. 1973;226:142–5. [PubMed]
  • Morimoto N, Raphael RM, Nygren A, Brownell WE. Excess plasma membrane and effects of ionic amphipaths on mechanics of outer hair cell lateral wall. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2002;282:C1076–86. [PubMed]
  • Myers EN, Bernstein JM. Salicylate ototoxicity; a clinical and experimental study. Arch Otolaryngol. 1965;82:483–93. [PubMed]
  • Oghalai JS, Patel AA, Nakagawa T, Brownell WE. Fluorescence-imaged microdeformation of the outer hair cell lateral wall. J.Neurosci. 1998;18:48–58. [PubMed]
  • Oliver D, He DZ, Klocker N, Ludwig J, Schulte U, Waldegger S, Ruppersberg JP, Dallos P, Fakler B. Intracellular anions as the voltage sensor of prestin, the outer hair cell motor protein. Science. 2001;292:2340–3. [PubMed]
  • Patuzzi R. Cochlear micromechanics and macromechanics. In: Dallos P, Popper AN, Fay RR, editors. The Cochlea. Springer-Verlag; New York: 1996. pp. 186–257.
  • Pollice PA, Brownell WE. Characterization of the outer hair cell's lateral wall membranes. Hear Res. 1993;70:187–96. [PubMed]
  • Raphael RM, Nguyen TA, Popel AS. Salicylate induced softening of membrane bilayers. Biophys J. 1999;76:A273.
  • Raphael RM, Popel AS, Brownell WE. A membrane bending model of outer hair cell electromotility. Biophys J. 2000;78:2844–62. [PubMed]
  • Ratnanather JT, Popel AS, Brownell WE. An analysis of the hydraulic conductivity of the extracisternal space of the cochlear outer hair cell. J Math Biol. 2000;40:372–82. [PubMed]
  • Ratnanather JT, Zhi M, Brownell WE, Popel AS. The ratio of elastic moduli of cochlear outer hair cells derived from osmotic experiments. J Acoust Soc Am. 1996a;99:1025–8. [PubMed]
  • Ratnanather JT, Zhi M, Brownell WE, Popel AS. Measurements and a model of the outer hair cell hydraulic conductivity. Hear Res. 1996b;96:33–40. [PubMed]
  • Russell IJ, Schauz C. Salicylate ototoxicity: effects on the stiffness and electromotility of outer hair cells isolated from the guinea pig cochlea. Aud. Neurosci. 1995;1:309–320.
  • Rybalchenko V, Santos-Sacchi J. Cl- flux through a non-selective, stretch-sensitive conductance influences the outer hair cell motor of the guinea-pig. J Physiol. 2003;547:873–91. [PubMed]
  • Shehata WE, Brownell WE, Dieler R. Effects of salicylate on shape, electromotility and membrane characteristics of isolated outer hair cells from guinea pig cochlea. Acta Otolaryngol. 1991;111:707–18. [PubMed]
  • Slepecky NB, Ligotti PJ. Characterization of inner ear sensory hair cells after rapid-freezing and freeze-substitution. J Neurocytol. 1992;21:374–81. [PubMed]
  • Snyder KV, Sachs F, Brownell WE. The outer hair cell: A mechanoelectrical and electromechanical sensor/actuator. In: Barth FG, Humphrey JAC, Secomb TW, editors. Sensors and Sensing in Biology and Engineering. Springer-Verlag; Wien.: 2003. pp. 71–95.
  • Spector AA, Brownell WE, Popel AS. Estimation of elastic moduli and bending stiffness of the anisotropic outer hair cell wall. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998;103:1007–11. [PubMed]
  • Spector AA, Popel AS, Eatock RA, Brownell WE. Mechanosensitive channels in the lateral wall can enhance the cochlear outer hair cell frequency response. Ann Biomed Eng. 2005;33:991–1002. [PubMed]
  • Stypulkowski PH. Mechanisms of salicylate ototoxicity. Hear Res. 1990;46:113–45. [PubMed]
  • Thode H., Jr. Testing for Normality. Marcel Dekker; New York: 2002.
  • Tunstall MJ, Gale JE, Ashmore JF. Action of salicylate on membrane capacitance of outer hair cells from the guinea-pig cochlea. J Physiol. 1995;485(Pt 3):739–52. [PubMed]
  • Zar JH. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall; Englewood Cliffs, NJ: 1984.
  • Zheng J, Shen W, He DZ, Long KB, Madison LD, Dallos P. Prestin is the motor protein of cochlear outer hair cells. Nature. 2000;405:149–55. [PubMed]
  • Zhou Y, Raphael RM. Effect of Salicylate on the Elasticity, Bending Stiffness and Strength of SOPC Membranes. Biophys J. 2005;89:1789–1801. [PubMed]