Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of jclinpathJournal of Clinical PathologyVisit this articleSubmit a manuscriptReceive email alertsContact usBMJ
J Clin Pathol. 2007 October; 60(10): 1076–1085.
Published online 2007 March 9. doi:  10.1136/jcp.2006.039263
PMCID: PMC2014851

Nodal aggressive B‐cell lymphomas: a diagnostic approach


The diffuse aggressive B‐cell lymphomas, as recognised in the 2001 WHO classification, represent a clinically and biologically heterogeneous group of neoplasms that require very different therapeutic approaches and have very different outcomes. They should be diagnosed using a multiparameter approach that emphasises morphological and immunophenotypic studies, and in at least some cases, relies on cytogenetic and/or genotypic studies. Incorporation of clinical data may be important as well. There is also current interest in going beyond the basic diagnosis and providing pathological prognostic information when possible. Whereas the diagnosis of some cases will be relatively easy, the differential diagnosis in others is very difficult, with some cases in a grey zone between two different well defined categories.

Keywords: aggressive B‐cell lymphoma, B‐cell lymphoma, Burkitt lymphoma, diffuse large cell lymphoma, high grade B‐cell lymphoma

Whereas in the past a discussion about how to approach a subset of lymphomas would require a lengthy discourse on the great attributes of one's classification of choice, today those contentious times are behind us. Built on the legacies of classifications from Rappaport1 to REAL,2 and organised first by cell type as introduced by the Lukes/Collins classification3 of 1974 and an integral part of the Kiel classification,4,5,6 the WHO classification of 2001 stands alone in terms of the options available in 2007.7 A revised edition of the WHO Monograph on Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues is in preparation and currently scheduled to be available in 2008. The WHO classification first divides the non‐Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) into those of B‐cell, T‐cell or natural killer (NK) cell origin. Each of these categories are then further subdivided based on whether the lymphoma is composed of precursor cells (lymphoblasts) or mature lymphoid (or plasmacytic) cells, with the latter cases then divided into one of the numerous types of mature lymphomas. Many of the B‐cell lymphomas can be related to one of the major B‐cell subsets (fig 11);); nevertheless, only distinct clinicopathological entities are separately designated. Each type of lymphoma is identified based on its morphological, phenotypic, genotypic/cytogenetic, and clinical features, although diagnoses can often be rendered without a full evaluation of each of these parameters.

figure cp39263.f1
Figure 1 Normal B‐cell development (oversimplified). B‐lineage lymphoblasts mature to naïve B‐cells that circulate and also populate primary follicles (not illustrated) and the mantle zone of follicles. Some may ...

This review aims to cover our approach to the diffuse aggressive B‐cell lymphomas, concentrating on those with lymph node involvement, and is not intended to supplant the very useful WHO monograph (box 1).7 The specific goals of this discussion are to explain the multiparameter approach we use for lymph node biopsies, to briefly review the aggressive B‐cell lymphomas, to explain how we approach making those diagnoses and to look at selected potentially problematic differential diagnoses.

Box 1 WHO classification of B‐cell lymphomas and B‐cell proliferations of uncertain malignant potential7

Precursor B‐cell neoplasm

  • Precursor B‐lymphoblastic leukaemia/lymphoma (precursor B‐cell ALL)*

Mature B‐cell neoplasms

  • Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma
  • B‐cell prolymphocytic leukaemia
  • Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma
  • Splenic marginal zone lymphoma
  • Hairy cell leukaemia
  • Plasma cell myeloma
  • Solitary plasmacytoma of bone
  • Extraosseous plasmacytoma
  • Extranodal marginal zone B‐cell lymphoma of mucosa‐associated lymphoid tissue (MALT‐lymphoma)
  • Nodal marginal zone B‐cell lymphoma
  • Follicular lymphoma
  • Mantle cell lymphoma*
  • Diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma*
  • Mediastinal (thymic) large B‐cell lymphoma*
  • Intravascular large B‐cell lymphoma
  • Primary effusion lymphoma
  • Burkitt lymphoma/leukaemia*

B‐cell proliferations of uncertain malignant potential

  • Lymphomatoid granulomatosis
  • Post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, polymorphic

*These lymphomas will be discussed.

Multiparameter approach for diagnostic lymph node biopsies

Lymph node biopsies should be received fresh and sectioned perpendicular to their long axis. Any focal lesions should be sampled and, if otherwise homogeneous, the ends of the lymph node used for ancillary studies. Both air dried (useful for a variety of stains/FISH studies) and fixed and stained touch imprints should be made. Well fixed sections are critical, and multicolour flow cytometric studies very useful to provide a complete immunophenotype with detection of even small populations with “aberrant” antigenic expression and evaluation of surface immunoglobulin (SIg) expression and intensity.8 Material should be snap frozen for possible molecular testing and, depending on local resources, appropriate cases may be sent for classical cytogenetic studies. The latter studies would be considered the least critical component of this protocol.9 If desired, one can also extract and store DNA and RNA for potential additional testing.

Diffuse aggressive B‐cell lymphomas

Precursor B‐lymphoblastic leukaemia/lymphoma

B‐lymphoblastic leukaemia/lymphoma (B‐LBicL) usually presents as a leukaemia but can present as a lymphoma at nodal or extranodal sites.10 Lymph nodes show a diffuse infiltrate of monotonous cells with round to irregular nuclear contours, finely dispersed chromatin and generally inconspicuous nucleoli, that not infrequently spare islands of normal lymphoid tissue (fig 22).). The neoplastic cells are positive for the B‐cell associated antigens CD79a, PAX‐5 and sometimes CD20 as well as for TdT and sometimes CD34. A significant proportion express the common ALL antigen, CD10. Beware, neuroendocrine neoplasms that can mimic B‐LBicL can also be PAX‐5 positive.11

figure cp39263.f2
Figure 2 Precursor B‐lymphoblastic leukaemia/lymphoma. The lymphoblasts are larger than the small lymphocytes seen in the disrupted mantle zone on the right and they have much more dispersed chromatin without very prominent nucleoli. The ...

Mantle cell lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphomas (MCL) have a survival similar to the most aggressive NHL, even though the cells are often small and some more indolent forms are now recognised.12,13,14,15 MCL are usually composed of monotonous relatively small lymphocytes with variably angulated/clefted non‐transformed nuclei that can have a mantle zone, vaguely follicular, diffuse or rarely very follicular growth pattern.12 Although centroblasts are essentially absent, a blastoid variant is recognised as composed either of cells having very dispersed chromatin and a high mitotic rate resembling lymphoblasts (classic type) (fig 3A3A)) or of larger and sometimes pleomorphic cells often with nucleoli, resembling the cells of a diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) (pleomorphic type) (fig 3B3B).12,16 Although a high mitotic rate (>10/10 high power field (hpf) and usually >20–30/hpf) and relatively high proportion of Ki‐67 positive cells are expected in blastoid MCL, there are no standard criteria, so that recognition of the blastoid variant of MCL remains a subjective morphological judgment. The most typical MCL phenotype is CD20+, CD5+, CD10−, bcl‐6−, CD43+, CD23−, FMC7+, SIg+ and cyclin D1+.17,18,19 Most but not all cases demonstrate a t(11;14)(q13;q32) cyclin D1 gene (CCND1)/immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) gene translocation.20

figure cp39263.f3
Figure 3 Blastoid mantle cell lymphoma variants. (A) The classic blastoid variant resembles a lymphoblastic lymphoma, including the presence of numerous mitotic figures. (B) The pleomorphic variant includes larger cells, some with prominent nucleoli ...

Diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma

DLBCL is “a diffuse proliferation of large neoplastic B lymphoid cells with nuclear size equal to or exceeding normal macrophage nuclei or more than twice the size of a normal lymphocyte”.21 Unfortunately, there are other types of lymphoma that would also fulfil this definition and some DLBCL that do not. DLBCL is a heterogeneous entity that includes a number of different variants and subtypes, with current interest in identifying additional prognostically meaningful subsets.

Major morphological variants

There are four major morphological variants of DLBCL that are well described in the WHO monograph: centroblastic (fig 44),), immunoblastic (fig 55),), T‐cell/histiocyte rich (T/HRBCL) and anaplastic.21 These variants are not considered to be of tremendous clinical significance although the centroblastic type is among the less aggressive and the immunoblastic and T/HRBCL types among the more aggressive DLBCL.21,22 The T/HRBCL cases have <10% large neoplastic B‐cells, few if any small B‐cells and an absence of follicular dendritic cell (FDC) networks (as documented, for example using an anti‐CD21 immunostain) (fig 66).). The neoplastic cells may resemble L&H cells of nodular lymphocyte predominant (NLP) Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL), centroblasts, immunoblasts or even more classic Reed–Sternberg cells.23,24 The anaplastic variant, composed of large anaplastic neoplastic cells that can grow in sinuses and be CD30/Ki‐1+, is mostly important to know about to avoid the misdiagnosis of an anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), since by definition the latter is not of B‐cell origin.

figure cp39263.f4
Figure 4 Diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma, centroblastic. Note the numerous transformed cells, many of which have nucleoli along the nuclear membrane.
figure cp39263.f5
Figure 5 Diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma, immunoblastic. There are numerous transformed cells with prominent single nucleoli and a moderate amount of often eccentrically placed cytoplasm.
figure cp39263.f6
Figure 6 T‐cell/histiocyte rich large B‐cell lymphoma. (A) There are scattered large neoplastic cells, some of which resemble Reed–Sternberg cells, in a background of small lymphocytes and occasional histiocytes. (B) The ...

Although not recognised in the WHO monograph, another important morphological variant of DLBCL is the type composed of often intermediate sized very blastoid‐appearing cells (fig 77).25 These lymphomas should not be misinterpreted as being composed of centrocytes just because the cells are relatively small and nucleoli not very prominent.

figure cp39263.f7
Figure 7 Diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma, blastoid. Note the blastoid cells with dispersed chromatin and the mitotic figures. Most of the cells are not very large and lack prominent nucleoli. Although resembling lymphoblasts and associated ...

Phenotypic studies

Phenotypic studies are used in the diagnosis of DLBCL mostly to prove that a “large cell” neoplasm is of B‐cell origin and as an aid in further classification/prognostication. Sometimes, however they may be required to help establish the neoplastic nature of a large lymphoid cell proliferation. Most but not all DLBCL express the B‐cell‐associated, but not B‐cell‐specific, CD20 antigen. This is important to document because of the widespread use of therapeutic anti‐CD20 antibodies. CD20− cases are recognised using other pan‐B cell antibodies that detect CD79a, CD22, PAX‐5 or CD19, or in some plasmacytic cases, by using antibodies that detect plasma‐cell associated antigens such as CD138 or cytoplasmic immunoglobulins.26,27,28 It should be noted that CD138 is present on many epithelial neoplasms and even some mesenchymal neoplasms.28 SIg, if present, is monoclonal but it may be non‐detectable. Use of a cyclin D1 antibody is important to help exclude a blastoid MCL and, in some circumstances, especially if SIg−, demonstrating negativity for TdT may be appropriate to help exclude a B‐LBicL. Genotypic studies to document B‐cell monoclonality are not usually required.

The detailed phenotype of DLBCL is variable.21,29,30,31,32 Some cases mark like cells in a follicular lymphoma (CD10+, bcl‐6+, bcl‐2+) and others more like later B‐cells with loss of follicular centre cell markers (CD10, bcl‐6) and acquisition of transitional (MUM‐1) and overt plasma cell‐associated markers (CD138). Some cases express the CD5 T‐cell associated antigen.33 It is particularly important in these latter cases to exclude the possibility of a MCL or transformation of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma.

Immunophenotypic studies have also been used in the prognostication of DLBCL and in predicting which patients will gain a therapeutic advantage from the use of rituximab. The current paradigm is that DLBCL of germinal centre (GC) type, as defined by gene profiling studies, are associated with a better prognosis than other DLBCL.34 Immunohistochemical studies may also play an important role here, although an agreed on algorithm is lacking and reproducibility in the performance and interpretation of the stains is also problematic. Hans et al found that DLBCL of GC type could be recognised when >30% of cells are CD10+ or bcl‐6+/Mum‐1−, whereas the more aggressive cases of non‐GC type were CD10− and either bcl‐6+/Mum‐1+ or bcl‐6−.35 Others have suggested the use of different algorithms and sometimes using additional antibodies.36 Some discourage the use of any of these algorithms due to the many remaining uncertainties. Bcl‐2 has also been reported to be an adverse prognostic indicator in many but not all studies, at least for subsets of DLBCL (for example, those of non‐GC type) and it has been reported that, while rituximab may be of some benefit in many patients with DLBCL, only those with bcl‐2+ disease show a survival advantage.21,22,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46 Others, however, have found that only patients with bcl‐6− DLBCL show a significant survival advantage when rituximab is added to their chemotherapy.47

Chromosomal abnormalities

DLBCL demonstrate BCL‐2 rearrangements in 20–30% of cases and BCL‐6 rearrangements in up to 30%.48,49 A small proportion have MYC translocations that, especially when also present with a BCL‐2 translocation, are an adverse prognostic indicator.50,51,52 In our experience, classical cytogenetic studies are successful in about 70% of DLBCL, with >90% of these studies showing an abnormal karyotype.9

Other variants/subtypes of DLBCL

Plasmablastic lymphomas

DLBCL with plasmablastic features/plasmablastic lymphomas (PBL) are a heterogeneous group of lymphomas, most of which are recognised as CD20−, CD45− neoplasms with a plasmacytic phenotype.53,54,55 PBL of “oral mucosa type” is found mostly in HIV+ patients and is frequently EBV+ but HHV8−.53,55,56,57 The neoplastic cells look like transformed lymphoid cells but they have a plasmacytic phenotype and must be distinguished from plasmablastic myeloma. Distinction of some plasmablastic lymphomas from extramedullary involvement by myeloma can be very difficult. Some of the findings that can be helpful include the clinical setting and laboratory findings (for example, a prior history of myeloma), and some phenotypic/cytogenetic findings, such as CCND1 (cyclin D1) translocation or cyclin D1 expression which is found in some myelomas but not in the plasmablastic lymphomas. Although not resembling a plasmablastic lymphoma, MCL with plasmacytic differentiation and a CCND1 translocation in both components has been reported.58 CD56 expression is also more commonly found in myeloma but is present in a moderate number of plasmablastic lymphomas as well.53 Although Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV) has been reported in plasmablastic neoplasms secondary to plasma cell neoplasms, its presence, in general, would not favour the diagnosis of myeloma.53

The CD20− group of PBL also includes cases with more overt plasmacytic differentiation (some of which are associated with plasma cell neoplasms), HHV8+ primary effusion lymphomas (which can form solid masses), some HHV8+ plasmablastic lymphomas associated with multicentric Castleman disease and ALK+ DLBCL. Other cases are CD20+ but show morphologic plasmacytic/plasmacytoid differentiation and have cytoplasmic immunoglobulin that is usually IgM.59 The expression of CD20 is generally not expected in the vast majority of true plasmablastic lymphomas, and with the exception of the plasmablastic proliferations associated with multicentric Castleman disease,57 its presence should strongly favour one of the non‐plasmablastic B‐cell lymphomas.53 It has been specifically suggested that CD20 positive lymphomas resembling a plasmablastic lymphoma are better considered as immunoblastic DLBCL.53 Remember, however, that even in multiple myeloma the plasma cells can be CD20+.

DLBCL with expression of anaplastic lymphoma kinase

Lymph node biopsies with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) positive DLBCL demonstrate a diffuse and intrasinus proliferation of large immunoblastic/plasmablastic‐appearing cells that may include pleomorphic forms and Reed–Sternberg‐like cells.60,61 Necrosis is frequent. The neoplastic cells in most cases lack pan‐B‐cell markers, but express plasma cell‐associated markers like CD138 and monoclonal cytoplasmic immunoglobulin that is often IgA. ALK+ DLBCL are EMA+ and sometimes have little or no CD45 expression, so they can be confused with metastatic carcinomas. Conversely, metastatic carcinomas may be CD138 positive, potentially causing confusion in the opposite direction as well. Most ALK+ DLBCL lack CD30 and, except for many cases with CD4 and CD57 expression, they lack T‐cell associated antigens. It is now recognised that ALK+ DLBCL usually have a t(2;17)(p23;q23) translocation involving the ALK and clathrin genes, and show granular cytoplasmic ALK positivity.62,63 Rare ALK+ DLBCL with the classic ALCL‐associated t(2;5) translocation has also been reported.64

Mediastinal large B‐cell lymphoma

Mediastinal large B‐cell lymphoma (MLBCL) is a DLBCL that most typically presents with an infiltrative anterior mediastinal mass but without disseminated disease.65,66 Although often characterised by a diffuse proliferation of relatively large lymphoid cells with moderately abundant pale cytoplasm and associated diffuse sclerosis (fig 88),), there is wide cytological variation, including some cases that will even raise the possibility of a marginal zone B‐cell lymphoma.67 MLBCL are CD5−, CD10−/+, frequently CD23+ (unlike most DLBCL), often CD30+, SIg− and CD20+.66,68,69 Other features, including some shared with a subset of classical HL, of importance, but not currently of great diagnostic utility, are discussed elsewhere.70,71,72,73,74,75

figure cp39263.f8
Figure 8 Mediastinal large B‐cell lymphoma. This somewhat lower magnification image of a PAS stain from a very typical case shows the diffuse proliferation of intermediate‐sized to large lymphoid cells with moderately abundant ...

Other large B‐cell lymphoproliferative disorders

Intravascular large B‐cell lymphomas grow within small vascular channels at extranodal sites and can easily be missed.76 Primary effusion lymphoma occurs mostly in HIV+ patients with neoplastic large B‐cells that are usually HHV8+ and EBV+.77 Another sometimes aggressive extranodal lymphoproliferative disorder, considered a lesion of uncertain malignant potential, is lymphomatoid granulomatosis, a usually EBV+ angiocentric lymphoproliferative disorder that has variable numbers of large monoclonal B‐cells admixed with reactive elements.78

It should also be remembered that grade 3 follicular lymphomas belong among the non‐indolent B‐cell lymphomas.79,80 These are divided into those with a mix of centrocytes and centroblasts (grade 3a) and those composed of pure centroblasts (grade 3b). The latter are more likely to have a pathogenesis like DLBCL and some would argue that they belong in that category.81,82 When follicular lymphomas are identified in which there are diffuse areas fulfilling the criteria for a DLBCL, both diagnoses need to be reported and the approximate area of each component should be noted.80 Although a complete discussion is beyond the scope of this review, it has been reported that grade 3 FL with a diffuse component of >50% have a worse outcome compared to those with less of a diffuse component.79

Burkitt's/atypical Burkitt's lymphoma

Burkitt's lymphoma (BL) are diffuse, and much less often in part follicular, proliferations of relatively small transformed cells with amphophilic cytoplasm (fig 9A9A).83 They have an extremely high proliferation fraction, prominent apoptosis and a “starry sky” appearance. Some cases, usually found in immunodeficient patients, have plasmacytoid features. The current convention is that Burkitt's and atypical Burkitt's (Burkitt‐like) lymphomas represent the same entity but with the latter showing more cytological variation. The terms atypical Burkitt's or Burkitt‐like lymphoma are not to be used simply because the cells of a DLBCL are on the smaller side. Most BL are SIg+, CD10+, and bcl‐2− with virtually 100% of their nuclei Ki‐67+, a phenotype shared with some DLBCL. Cytogenetic studies show a translocation involving MYC at chromosome 8q24 and usually either the IgH locus at 14q32 or less commonly either the kappa or lambda light chain loci at 2q11 or 22q11, respectively (fig 9B9B).). There are usually few other abnormalities.84 It is critical to realise that a MYC translocation is not specific for BL, so that if one is going to use FISH to help document the diagnosis of BL, one should also look for BCL‐2 and BCL‐6 translocations that usually ought to be absent.

figure cp39263.f9
Figure 9 Burkitt's lymphoma. (A) There is a diffuse proliferation of intermediate sized transformed lymphoid cells and associated tingible body macrophages, creating a starry sky appearance. The degree of cytological variation is acceptable for ...

Our approach to the diagnosis of the node‐based aggressive B‐cell lymphomas

Our multistep diagnostic algorithm relies on morphological evaluation, summarised in fig 1010,, followed by further diagnostic refinement using immunophenotypic studies, as summarised in fig 1111.. Caution is always advised as there are exceptions to all of the phenotypic profiles indicated in the figure. We use flow cytometric methods whenever possible for the reasons discussed earlier. Detection of light chain class restricted SIg favours the presence of a mature (non‐lymphoblastic) B‐cell neoplasm most likely not of MLBCL type. If there is any chance of a MCL, we perform a cyclin D1 stain since MCL can mimic almost any other type of B‐cell lymphoma and not all are CD5+. Classical cytogenetic studies can also be helpful, but they are not widely utilised for lymph node biopsies.9 Cytogenetic FISH studies can also be used to help resolve selected differential diagnoses. Selection of appropriate FISH panels is important, since, for example, isolated MYC translocations have different implications than those associated with another lymphoma‐associated translocation. Genotypic studies can be used to document a clonal B‐cell population or selected chromosomal translocations; however, they have their own limitations and we utilise them only infrequently in dealing with potential aggressive B‐cell lymphomas.

figure cp39263.f10
Figure 10 Morphological‐based decision tree for major B‐cell lymphomas. *These are not discussed in this manuscript. They include chronic lymphocytic leukaemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, follicular lymphoma (except for ...
figure cp39263.f11
Figure 11 Basic immunophenotypic evaluation of non‐indolent B‐cell lymphomas. *Pan‐B‐cell markers include antibodies to CD19, CD20, CD22, CD79a and PAX‐5. Some may be negative in selected cases. ...

Potentially problematic differential diagnoses

BL versus DLBCL

Although it is considered very important to distinguish BL from DLBCL to prevent overtreatment of DLBCL and undertreatment of BL, it can be very difficult, especially in adults, and gold standard criteria are lacking.84,85,86,87,88,89 The problematic cases usually have many Burkitt‐like morphological features but either the phenotype/genotype/karyotype is too “atypical”, the cytological appearance is beyond that described for “atypical” BL, or both. Depressingly, Stein and Hummel wrote just last year that “at present, there are no reliable criteria that can be applied to distinguish BL from DLBCL”.90 Studies that have addressed this problem have found only a minority of cases that fulfil all of the typical BL criteria described above; one study found no adult cases.85,87,91

Recent gene profiling studies have demonstrated the existence of a molecularly homogeneous group of BL that are morphologically, phenotypically and even cytogenetically heterogeneous.84,88,89 While this suggests that the criteria we use to diagnose BL cannot always be relied on, gene profiling studies are not standardised and not currently a clinical laboratory test. Furthermore, consistent with our daily experience, one of the major gene profiling studies also demonstrated the presence of cases that were “intermediate” between BL and DLBCL, substantiating the existence of a true grey zone.92 Our current imperfect modus operandi is to diagnose BL when the morphological appearance is acceptable (but not necessarily typical), the phenotype is typical and a MYC but not a BCL‐2 or BCL‐6 translocation is present. Most other cases require a more descriptive diagnosis and use of a term like “high grade B‐cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified” or DLBCL with “high grade” features, with the cases having the fewest discrepancies from the typical constellation of BL findings being considered closer to a “real” BL.87 In addition, although not a quantitative science and beyond this brief review, the reality is that some discrepancies also carry less weight than others, especially if the finding is not entirely convincing, such as possible weak bcl‐2 protein expression in an otherwise typical BL. Once one is dealing with a case with BL at least in the differential, reliance solely on “biological markers” (Ki‐67 >90%, CD10+, bcl‐6+, bcl‐2−, MYC translocated but not BCL‐2 or BCL‐6) seems to identify a more homogeneous population of patients, than use of a consensus histological/immunophenotypic diagnosis.85 However, many of the lymphomas in the BL/DLBCL grey zone region that are not felt to fulfil the criteria for a BL, still have “a phenotypic and/or genetic shift to BL”. We would specifically designate cases with coexistent MYC and BCL‐2 and/or BCL‐6 translocations as at least those with dual MYC and BCL‐2 translocations are known to be extremely aggressive (fig 1212).50,93,94 Although BCL‐2 translocations are rarely found in molecularly‐defined BL, Hummel et al found them more commonly in their intermediate or non‐BL groups and BCL‐6 translocations were never found in BL.84 The best therapy for the DLBCL with some BL‐like features remains to be defined, although some report that cases with some of the BL features do not do well when they receive more typical DLBCL therapy.95,96

figure cp39263.f12
Figure 12 High grade B‐cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified/diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma with high grade features, CD10+/− (negative by flow cytometry), bcl‐2+, MUM‐1+, Ki‐67 ...

T/HRBCL versus NLPHL or T‐cell NHL with large B‐cells

The distinction of T/HRBCL from nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin's lymphoma (NLPHL) is important since these entities are usually treated very differently and because T/HRBCL is a more aggressive neoplasm. This differential diagnosis, however, can be difficult because diffuse areas of NLPHL can be indistinguishable from T/HRBCL and some NLPHL are very rich in small T‐cells.97 Two major criteria that favour a diagnosis of T/HRBCL over NLPHL include absence of a nodular growth pattern as documented with an immunostain for FDC and a paucity of small B‐cells. The differential diagnosis may also include peripheral T‐cell lymphoma (PTCL) with admixed large B‐cells or Reed–Sternberg‐like cells.98,99 The presence of significant cytological atypia and immunophenotypic aberrancy in the T‐cells as well as genotypic support of a clonal T‐cell population would favour the diagnosis of a PTCL, even though some small lymphoid atypia can be seen in NLPHL.

DLBCL versus classical HL

Some cases of DLBCL, especially T/HRBCL, may resemble classical HL with scattered Reed–Sternberg‐like cells in a background of small lymphoid cells. Conversely, some classical HL can have numerous large transformed‐appearing cells and resemble a DLBCL (or other type of NHL). The presence of uniform strong staining for pan B‐cell markers such as CD20 and CD79a, positivity for both Oct‐2 and BOB.1, positivity for CD45 and lack of staining for CD15, although not specific, all support the diagnosis of DLBCL. However, there are a group of “grey zone” lymphomas, often within the mediastinum.100,101 Some of these cases demonstrate morphological features of classical HL and immunophenotypic characteristics of DLBCL or vice versa. Other cases demonstrate both morphological and immunophenotypic features intermediate between classical HL and DLBCL, being CD30+, CD15+ and strongly CD20+.100 While it is worth favouring one diagnosis over the other, in some cases that may be impossible, and the concept of “grey zone” lymphomas should be discussed. It is probably wise to err on the side of a NHL and to treat as such, but also to acknowledge the diagnostic difficulties and the importance of keeping an open mind in cases refractory to therapy.101

Blastoid MCL versus DLBCL or B‐LBicL

Blastoid MCL can closely resemble DLBCL or B‐LBicL so that we advise liberal use of a stain for cyclin D1 which is almost always positive in MCL but not in DLBCL or B‐LBicL. Furthermore, only B‐LBicL will be TdT+. Myeloma and hairy cell leukaemia (HCL) can also be cyclin D1+, but other morphological and phenotypic differences usually help exclude those entities and HCL does not have CCND1 translocations. Whether infrequent non‐MCL cyclin D1+ DLBCL exist remains to be determined.

DLBCL versus diffuse small B‐cell lymphomas with increased transformed cells

Some small B‐cell lymphomas, not discussed above, may also raise the question of a DLBCL. Lymph nodes with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) may have very prominent proliferation centres that can become partially confluent in the absence of classic transformation. It is important to review the peripheral blood smears in these cases that can begin to resemble a DLBCL. Ultimately there may be a sheet of paraimmunoblasts with prolymphocytic/prolymphocytoid transformation of CLL/SLL. The correct diagnosis can usually be reached by correlating the clinical, pathological and immunophenotypic features. Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma and extranodal, nodal and splenic marginal zone B‐cell lymphomas can also have a moderate number of transformed cells in the absence of transformation to a higher grade neoplasm.102,103,104,105,106,107,108 In at least some of these situations, however, the increased numbers of transformed cells may be associated with an adverse prognosis. At the current time, other than adding a comment to their report, pathologists should be conservative in these circumstances unless sheets of transformed cells are found, in which case the diagnosis of a DLBCL should be given.

Take‐home messages

  • Diagnosis of the aggressive B‐cell lymphomas requires a multiparameter approach incorporating morphological, immunophenotypic, clinical and in certain instances cytogenetic and other genotypic features.
  • The aggressive B‐cell lymphomas should be classified as accurately as possible using the WHO classification.
  • There is growing interest in the evaluation of pathological features that may have prognostic implications; however, as therapies change so can prognostic markers, and standardisation in the performance and interpretation of these tests is often lacking.
  • Even using the most sophisticated tools, some cases will fall in a grey zone between two entities. These cases should be acknowledged as such and not forced into a category they might not truly belong in.
  • Pathologists should keep up with the current literature as even this publication will be out of date in a depressingly short period of time.


The authors thank Dr U Surti and Ms M Sherer for contributing the cytogenetic images.


Competing interests: None.


1. Rappaport H. Tumors of the hematopoietic system. Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 1966
2. Harris N L, Jaffe E S, Stein H. et al A revised European–American classification of lymphoid neoplasms: a proposal from the International Lymphoma Study Group. Blood 1994. 841361–1392.1392 [PubMed]
3. Lukes R J, Collins R D. Immunologic characterization of human malignant lymphomas. Cancer 1974. 34(4 Suppl)1488–1503.1503 [PubMed]
4. Gerard‐Marchant R, Hamlin I, Lennert K. et al Classification of non‐Hodgkin's lymphomas. Lancet 1974. 2406–408.408
5. Lennert K, Collins R D, Lukes R J. Concordance of the Kiel and Lukes–Collins classifications of non‐Hodgkin's lymphomas. Histopathology 1983. 7549–559.559 [PubMed]
6. Stansfeld A G, Diebold J, Noel H. et al Updated Kiel classification for lymphomas [correction appears in Lancet 1988;1:372]. Lancet 1988. 1292–293.293 [PubMed]
7. Jaffe E S, Harris N L, Stein H, Vardiman J W. eds. Pathology and genetics of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues Lyon: IARC Press, 2001
8. Tbakhi A, Edinger M, Myles J. et al Flow cytometric immunophenotyping of non‐Hodgkin's lymphomas and related disorders. Cytometry 1996. 25113–124.124 [PubMed]
9. Cook J R, Shekhter‐Levin S, Swerdlow S H. Utility of routine classical cytogenetic studies in the evaluation of suspected lymphomas: results of 279 consecutive lymph node/extranodal tissue biopsies. Am J Clin Pathol 2004. 121826–835.835 [PubMed]
10. Brunning R D, Borowitz M, Matutes E. et al Precursor B lymphoblastic leukaemia/lymphoblastic lymphoma (precursor B‐cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia). In: Jaffe ES, Harris NL, Stein H, Vardiman JW, eds. Pathology and genetics of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. Lyon: IARC Press, 2001. 111–114.114
11. Dong H Y, Liu W, Cohen P. et al B‐cell specific activation protein encoded by the PAX‐5 gene is commonly expressed in Merkel cell carcinoma and small cell carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol 2005. 29687–692.692 [PubMed]
12. Swerdlow S H, Berger F, Issacson P G. et al Mantle cell lymphoma. In: Jaffe ES, Harris NL, Stein H, Vardiman JW, eds. World Health Organization classification of tumours. Pathology and genetics of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues Lyon: IARC, 2001. 168–170.170
13. Campo E, Raffeld M, Jaffe E S. Mantle‐cell lymphoma. Semin Hematol 1999. 36115–127.127 [PubMed]
14. Nodit L, Bahler D W, Jacobs S A. et al Indolent mantle cell lymphoma with nodal involvement and mutated immunoglobulin heavy chain genes. Human Pathol 2003. 341030–1034.1034 [PubMed]
15. Orchard J, Garand R, Davis Z. et al A subset of t(11;14) lymphoma with mantle cell features displays mutated IgVH genes and includes patients with good prognosis, nonnodal disease. Blood 2003. 1014975–4981.4981 [PubMed]
16. Ott G, Kalla J, Ott M M. et al Blastoid variants of mantle cell lymphoma: frequent bcl‐1 rearrangements at the major translocation cluster region and tetraploid chromosome clones. Blood 1997. 891421–1429.1429 [PubMed]
17. Fu K, Weisenburger D D, Greiner T C. et al Cyclin D1‐negative mantle cell lymphoma: a clinicopathologic study based on gene expression profiling. Blood 2005. 1064315–4321.4321 [PubMed]
18. Rosenwald A, Wright G, Wiestner A. et al The proliferation gene expression signature is a quantitative integrator of oncogenic events that predicts survival in mantle cell lymphoma. Cancer Cell 2003. 3185–197.197 [PubMed]
19. Camacho F I, Garcia J F, Cigudosa J C. et al Aberrant Bcl6 protein expression in mantle cell lymphoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2004. 281051–1056.1056 [PubMed]
20. Swerdlow S H, Williams M E. From centrocytic to mantle cell lymphoma: a clinicopathologic and molecular review of 3 decades. Hum Pathol 2002. 337–20.20 [PubMed]
21. Gatter K C, Warnke R A. Diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma. In: Jaffe ES, Harris NL, Stein H, Vardiman JW, eds. World Health Organization classification of tumours. Pathology and genetics of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues Lyon: IARC Press, 2001. 171–174.174
22. Loeffler M, Shipp M, Stein H. Report on the workshop: “Clinical consequences of pathology and prognostic factors in aggressive NHL”. Ann Hematol 2001. 80(Suppl 3)B8–12.12 [PubMed]
23. Lim M S, Beaty M, Sorbara L. et al T‐cell/histiocyte‐rich large B‐cell lymphoma: a heterogeneous entity with derivation from germinal center B cells. Am J Surg Pathol 2002. 261458–1466.1466 [PubMed]
24. Fraga M, Sanchez‐Verde L, Forteza J. et al T‐cell/histiocyte‐rich large B‐cell lymphoma is a disseminated aggressive neoplasm: differential diagnosis from Hodgkin's lymphoma. Histopathology 2002. 41216–229.229 [PubMed]
25. Natkunam Y, Warnke R A, Zehnder J L. et al Blastic/blastoid transformation of follicular lymphoma: immunohistologic and molecular analyses of five cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2000. 24525–534.534 [PubMed]
26. Chu P G, Loera S, Huang Q. et al Lineage determination of CD20− B‐cell neoplasms: an immunohistochemical study. Am J Clin Pathol 2006. 126534–544.544 [PubMed]
27. Wijdenes J, Vooijs W C, Clement C. et al A plasmocyte selective monoclonal antibody (B‐B4) recognizes syndecan‐1. Br J Haematol 1996. 94318–323.323 [PubMed]
28. Kambham N, Kong C, Longacre T A. et al Utility of syndecan‐1 (CD138) expression in the diagnosis of undifferentiated malignant neoplasms: a tissue microarray study of 1,754 cases. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2005. 13304–310.310 [PubMed]
29. Dogan A, Bagdi E, Munson P. et al CD10 and BCL‐6 expression in paraffin sections of normal lymphoid tissue and B‐cell lymphomas. Am J Surg Pathol 2000. 24846–852.852 [PubMed]
30. King B E, Chen C, Locker J. et al Immunophenotypic and genotypic markers of follicular center cell neoplasia in diffuse large B‐cell lymphomas. Mod Pathol 2000. 131219–1231.1231 [PubMed]
31. Natkunam Y, Warnke R, Alizadeh A. et al BCL‐6 protein expression predicts improved survival in patients with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma. Mod Pathol 2001. 141017
32. Skinnider B F, Horsman D E, Dupuis B. et al Bcl‐6 and Bcl‐2 protein expression in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma: correlation with 3q27 and 18q21 chromosomal abnormalities. Hum Pathol 1999. 30803–808.808 [PubMed]
33. Yamaguchi M, Seto M, Okamoto M. et al De novo CD5+ diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma: a clinicopathologic study of 109 patients. Blood 2002. 99815–821.821 [PubMed]
34. Rosenwald A, Wright G, Chan W C. et al The use of molecular profiling to predict survival after chemotherapy for diffuse large‐B‐cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med 2002. 3461937–1947.1947 [PubMed]
35. Hans C P, Weisenburger D D, Greiner T C. et al Confirmation of the molecular classification of diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma by immunohistochemistry using a tissue microarray. Blood 2004. 103275–282.282 [PubMed]
36. Zinzani P L, Dirnhofer S, Sabattini E. et al Identification of outcome predictors in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma. Immunohistochemical profiling of homogeneously treated de novo tumors with nodal presentation on tissue micro‐arrays. Haematologica 2005. 90341–347.347 [PubMed]
37. Mounier N, Briere J, Gisselbrecht C. et al Rituximab plus CHOP (R‐CHOP) overcomes bcl‐2‐associated resistance to chemotherapy in elderly patients with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Blood 2003. 1014279–4284.4284 [PubMed]
38. Barrans S L, Carter I, Owen R G. et al Germinal center phenotype and bcl‐2 expression combined with the International Prognostic Index improves patient risk stratification in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma. Blood 2002. 991136–1143.1143 [PubMed]
39. Rantanen S, Monni O, Joensuu H. et al Causes and consequences of BCL2 overexpression in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma 2001. 421089–1098.1098 [PubMed]
40. Kramer M H, Hermans J, Wijburg E. et al Clinical relevance of BCL2, BCL6, and MYC rearrangements in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma. Blood 1998. 923152–3162.3162 [PubMed]
41. Hermine O, Haioun C, Lepage E. et al Prognostic significance of bcl‐2 protein expression in aggressive non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma. Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte (GELA). Blood 1996. 87265–272.272 [PubMed]
42. Gascoyne R D, Adomat S A, Krajewski S. et al Prognostic significance of Bcl‐2 protein expression and Bcl‐2 gene rearrangement in diffuse aggressive non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma. Blood 1997. 90244–251.251 [PubMed]
43. Hill M E, MacLennan K A, Cunningham D C. et al Prognostic significance of BCL‐2 expression and bcl‐2 major breakpoint region rearrangement in diffuse large cell non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma: a British National Lymphoma Investigation Study. Blood 1996. 881046–1051.1051 [PubMed]
44. Sanchez E, Chacon I, Plaza M M. et al Clinical outcome in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma is dependent on the relationship between different cell‐cycle regulator proteins. J Clin Oncol 1998. 161931–1939.1939 [PubMed]
45. Iqbal J, Neppalli V T, Wright G. et al BCL2 expression is a prognostic marker for the activated B‐cell‐like type of diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2006. 24961–968.968 [PubMed]
46. Mounier N, Briere J, Gisselbrecht C. et al Estimating the impact of rituximab on bcl‐2‐associated resistance to CHOP in elderly patients with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma. Haematologica 2006. 91715–716.716 [PubMed]
47. Winter J N, Weller E A, Horning S J. et al Prognostic significance of Bcl‐6 protein expression in DLBCL treated with CHOP or R‐CHOP: a prospective correlative study. Blood 2006. 107 pp 4207-13. Erratum Blood 2007. 1092292. [PubMed]
48. Lo Coco F, Ye B H, Lista F. et al Rearrangements of the BCL6 gene in diffuse large cell non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma. Blood 1994. 831757–1759.1759 [PubMed]
49. Huang J Z, Sanger W G, Greiner T C. et al The t(14;18) defines a unique subset of diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma with a germinal center B‐cell gene expression profile. Blood 2002. 992285–2290.2290 [PubMed]
50. Macpherson N, Lesack D, Klasa R. et al Small noncleaved, non‐Burkitt's (Burkitt‐like) lymphoma: cytogenetics predict outcome and reflect clinical presentation. J Clin Oncol 1999. 171558–1567.1567 [PubMed]
51. Vitolo U, Gaidano G, Botto B. et al Rearrangements of bcl‐6, bcl‐2, c‐myc and 6q deletion in B‐diffuse large‐cell lymphoma: clinical relevance in 71 patients. Ann Oncol 1998. 955–61.61 [PubMed]
52. Au W Y, Horsman D E, Gascoyne R D. et al The spectrum of lymphoma with 8q24 aberrations: a clinical, pathological and cytogenetic study of 87 consecutive cases. Leukemia Lymphoma 2004. 45519–528.528 [PubMed]
53. Colomo L, Loong F, Rives S. et al Diffuse large B‐cell lymphomas with plasmablastic differentiation represent a heterogeneous group of disease entities. Am J Surg Pathol 2004. 28736–747.747 [PubMed]
54. Teruya‐Feldstein J, Chiao E, Filippa D A. et al CD20‐negative large‐cell lymphoma with plasmablastic features: a clinically heterogenous spectrum in both HIV positive and negative patients. Ann Oncol 2004. 151673–1679.1679 [PubMed]
55. Teruya‐Feldstein J. Diffuse large B‐cell lymphomas with plasmablastic differentiation. Curr Oncol Rep 2005. 7357–363.363 [PubMed]
56. Delecluse H J, Anagnostopoulos I, Dallenbach F. et al Plasmablastic lymphomas of the oral cavity: a new entity associated with the human immunodeficiency virus infection. Blood 1997. 891413–1420.1420 [PubMed]
57. Dupin N, Diss T L, Kellam P. et al HHV‐8 is associated with a plasmablastic variant of Castleman disease that is linked to HHV‐8‐positive plasmablastic lymphoma. Blood 2000. 951406–1412.1412 [PubMed]
58. Young K H, Chan W C, Fu K. et al Mantle cell lymphoma with plasma cell differentiation. Am J Surg Pathol 2006. 30954–961.961 [PubMed]
59. Simonitsch‐Klupp I, Hauser I, Ott G. et al Diffuse large B‐cell lymphomas with plasmablastic/plasmacytoid features are associated with TP53 deletions and poor clinical outcome. Leukemia 2004. 18146–155.155 [PubMed]
60. Delsol G, Lamant L, Mariame B. et al A new subtype of large B‐cell lymphoma expressing the ALK kinase and lacking the 2;5 translocation. Blood 1997. 891483–1490.1490 [PubMed]
61. Reichard K K, McKenna R W, Kroft S H. ALK‐positive diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma: report of four cases and review of the literature. Mod Pathol 2007. 20310–319.319 [PubMed]
62. Gascoyne R D, Lamant L, Martin‐Subero J I. et al ALK‐positive diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma is associated with clathrin‐ALK rearrangements: report of six cases. Blood 2003. 1022568–2573.2573 [PubMed]
63. De Paepe P, Baens M, van Krieken H. et al ALK activation by the CTLC‐ALK fusion is a recurrent event in large B‐cell lymphoma. Blood 2003. 1022638–2641.2641 [PubMed]
64. Onciu M, Behm F G, Downing J R. et al ALK‐positive plasmablastic B‐cell lymphoma with expression of the NPM‐ALK fusion transcript: report of two cases. Blood 2003. 1022642–2644.2644 [PubMed]
65. Barth T F, Leithauser F, Joos S. et al Mediastinal (thymic) large B‐cell lymphoma: where do we stand? Lancet Oncol 2002. 3229–234.234 [PubMed]
66. Banks P M, Warnke R A. Mediastinal (thymic) large B‐cell lymphoma. In: Jaffe ES, Harris NL, Stein H, Vardiman JW, eds. Pathology and genetics of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. Lyon: IARC Press, 2001. 175–176.176
67. Paulli M, Strater J, Gianelli U. et al Mediastinal B‐cell lymphoma: a study of its histomorphologic spectrum based on 109 cases. Hum Pathol 1999. 30178–187.187 [PubMed]
68. Pileri S A, Gaidano G, Zinzani P L. et al Primary mediastinal B‐cell lymphoma: high frequency of BCL‐6 mutations and consistent expression of the transcription factors OCT‐2, BOB.1, and PU.1 in the absence of immunoglobulins. Am J Pathol 2003. 162243–253.253 [PubMed]
69. Calaminici M, Piper K, Lee A M. et al CD23 expression in mediastinal large B‐cell lymphomas. Histopathology 2004. 45619–624.624 [PubMed]
70. Copie‐Bergman C, Plonquet A, Alonso M A. et al MAL expression in lymphoid cells: further evidence for MAL as a distinct molecular marker of primary mediastinal large B‐cell lymphomas. Mod Pathol 2002. 151172–1180.1180 [PubMed]
71. Bentz M, Barth T F, Bruderlein S. et al Gain of chromosome arm 9p is characteristic of primary mediastinal B‐cell lymphoma (MBL): comprehensive molecular cytogenetic analysis and presentation of a novel MBL cell line. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2001. 30393–401.401 [PubMed]
72. Joos S, Otano‐Joos M I, Ziegler S. et al Primary mediastinal (thymic) B‐cell lymphoma is characterized by gains of chromosomal material including 9p and amplification of the REL gene. Blood 1996. 871571–1578.1578 [PubMed]
73. Feuerhake F, Kutok J L, Monti S. et al NFkappaB activity, function, and target‐gene signatures in primary mediastinal large B‐cell lymphoma and diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma subtypes. Blood 2005. 1061392–1399.1399 [PubMed]
74. Savage K J, Monti S, Kutok J L. et al The molecular signature of mediastinal large B‐cell lymphoma differs from that of other diffuse large B‐cell lymphomas and shares features with classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood 2003. 1023871–3879.3879 [PubMed]
75. Rosenwald A, Wright G, Leroy K. et al Molecular diagnosis of primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma identifies a clinically favorable subgroup of diffuse large B cell lymphoma related to Hodgkin lymphoma. J Exp Med 2003. 198851–862.862 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
76. Gatter K C, Warnke R A. Intravascular large B‐cell lymphoma. In: Jaffe ES, Harris NL, Stein H, Vardiman JW, eds. Pathology and genetics of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. Lyon: IARC Press, 2001. 177–178.178
77. Banks P M, Warnke R A. Primary effusion lymphoma. In: Jaffe ES, Harris NL, Stein H, Vardiman JW, eds. Pathology and genetics of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. Lyon: IARC Press, 2001. 179–180.180
78. Jaffe E S, Wilson W H. Lymphomatoid granulomatosis. In: Jaffe ES, Harris NL, Stein H, Vardiman JW, eds. World Health Organization classification of tumours. Pathology and genetics of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues Lyon: IARC Press, 2001. 185–187.187
79. Ganti A K, Weisenburger D D, Smith L M. et al Patients with grade 3 follicular lymphoma have prolonged relapse‐free survival following anthracycline‐based chemotherapy: the Nebraska Lymphoma Study Group Experience. Ann Oncol 2006. 17920–927.927 [PubMed]
80. Nathwani B N, Harris N L, Weisenburger D. et al Follicular lymphoma. In: Jaffe ES, Harris NL, Stein H, Vardiman JW, eds. World Health Organization classification of tumours. Pathology and genetics of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues Lyon: IARC Press, 2001. 162–167.167
81. Bosga‐Bouwer A G, van den Berg A, Haralambieva E. et al Molecular, cytogenetic, and immunophenotypic characterization of follicular lymphoma grade 3B; a separate entity or part of the spectrum of diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma or follicular lymphoma? Hum Pathol 2006. 37528–533.533 [PubMed]
82. Ott G, Katzenberger T, Lohr A. et al Cytomorphologic, immunohistochemical, and cytogenetic profiles of follicular lymphoma: 2 types of follicular lymphoma grade 3. Blood 2002. 993806–3812.3812 [PubMed]
83. Diebold J, Jaffe E S, Raphael M. et al Burkitt lymphoma. In: Jaffe ES, Harris NL, Stein H, Vardiman JW, eds. World Health Organization classification of tumours. Pathology and genetics of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues Lyon: IARC Press, 2001. 181–184.184
84. Hummel M, Bentink S, Berger H. et al A biologic definition of Burkitt's lymphoma from transcriptional and genomic profiling. N Engl J Med 2006. 3542419–2430.2430 [PubMed]
85. Haralambieva E, Boerma E ‐ J, van Imhoff G W. et al Clinical, immunophenotypic, and genetic analysis of adult lymphomas with morphologic features of Burkitt lymphoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2005. 291086–1094.1094 [PubMed]
86. Anon A clinical evaluation of the International Lymphoma Study Group classification of non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma. The Non‐Hodgkin's Lymphoma Classification Project. Blood 1997. 893909–3918.3918 [PubMed]
87. Cogliatti S B, Novak U, Henz S. et al Diagnosis of Burkitt lymphoma in due time: a practical approach. Br J Haematol 2006. 134294–301.301 [PubMed]
88. Dave S S, Fu K, Wright G W. et al Molecular diagnosis of Burkitt's lymphoma. N Engl J Med 2006. 3542431–2442.2442 [PubMed]
89. Harris N L, Horning S J. Burkitt's lymphoma—the message from microarrays. N Engl J Med 2006. 3542495–2498.2498 [PubMed]
90. Stein H, Hummel M. Histopathology in the light of molecular profiling. Ann Oncol 2006. 17(Suppl 4)iv5–iv7.iv7 [PubMed]
91. McClure R F, Remstein E D, Macon W R. et al Adult B‐cell lymphomas with Burkitt‐like morphology are phenotypically and genotypically heterogeneous with aggressive clinical behavior. Am J Surg Pathol 2005. 291652–1660.1660 [PubMed]
92. Hummel M, Bentink S, Berger H. et al A biologic definition of Burkitt's lymphoma from transcriptional and genomic profiling. N Engl J Med 2006. 3542419–2430.2430 [PubMed]
93. Kanungo A, Medeiros L J, Abruzzo L V. et al Lymphoid neoplasms associated with concurrent t(14;18) and 8q24/c‐MYC translocation generally have a poor prognosis. Mod Pathol 2006. 1925–33.33 [PubMed]
94. Stamatoullas A, Buchonnet G, Lepretre S. et al De novo acute B cell leukemia/lymphoma with t(14;18). Leukemia 2000. 141960–1966.1966 [PubMed]
95. Dave S S, Fu K, Wright G W. et al Molecular diagnosis of Burkitt's lymphoma. N Engl J Med 2006. 3542431–2442.2442 [PubMed]
96. Braziel R M, Arber D A, Slovak M L. et al The Burkitt‐like lymphomas: a Southwest Oncology Group study delineating phenotypic, genotypic, and clinical features. Blood 2001. 973713–3720.3720 [PubMed]
97. Fan Z, Natkunam Y, Bair E. et al Characterization of variant patterns of nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma with immunohistologic and clinical correlation. Am J Surg Pathol 2003. 271346–1356.1356 [PubMed]
98. Higgins J P, van de Rijn M, Jones C D. et al Peripheral T‐cell lymphoma complicated by a proliferation of large B cells. Am J Clin Pathol 2000. 114236–247.247 [PubMed]
99. Barry T S, Jaffe E S, Sorbara L. et al Peripheral T‐cell lymphomas expressing CD30 and CD15. Am J Surg Pathol 2003. 271513–1522.1522 [PubMed]
100. Garcia J F, Mollejo M, Fraga M. et al Large B‐cell lymphoma with Hodgkin's features. Histopathology 2005. 47101–110.110 [PubMed]
101. Traverse‐Glehen A, Pittaluga S, Gaulard P. et al Mediastinal gray zone lymphoma: the missing link between classic Hodgkin's lymphoma and mediastinal large B‐cell lymphoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2005. 291411–1421.1421 [PubMed]
102. Andriko J A W, Swerdlow S H, Aguilera N I. et al Is lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma/immunocytoma a distinct entity? A clinicopathologic study of 20 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2001. 25742–751.751 [PubMed]
103. de Jong D, Boot H, van Heerde P. et al Histological grading in gastric lymphoma: pretreatment criteria and clinical relevance. Gastroenterology 1997. 1121466–1474.1474 [PubMed]
104. de Jong D, Vyth‐Dreese F, Dellemijn T. et al Histological and immunological parameters to predict treatment outcome of Helicobacter pylori eradication in low‐grade gastric MALT lymphoma. J Pathol 2001. 193318–324.324 [PubMed]
105. Ferreri A J M, Freschi M, Dell'Oro S. et al Prognostic significance of the histopathologic recognition of low‐ and high‐grade components in stage I‐II B‐cell gastric lymphomas. Am J Surg Pathol 2001. 2595–102.102 [PubMed]
106. Traverse‐Glehen A, Felman P, Callet‐Bauchu E. et al A clinicopathological study of nodal marginal zone B‐cell lymphoma. A report on 21 cases. Histopathology 2006. 48162–173.173 [PubMed]
107. Camacho F I, Algara P, Mollejo M. et al Nodal marginal zone lymphoma: a heterogeneous tumor: a comprehensive analysis of a series of 27 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2003. 27762–771.771 [PubMed]
108. Lloret E, Mollejo M, Mateo M S. et al Splenic marginal zone lymphoma with increased number of blasts: an aggressive variant? Hum Pathol 1999. 301153–1160.1160 [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group