Although the biological significance of its multi-compartmental distribution is yet to be elucidated, the relevance of gC1qR as an important modulator of ligands both inside and outside the cell is becoming increasingly apparent.
Intracellular gC1qR has been reported to interact specifically with an arginine–rich motif in the C-tails of both hamster alpha 1 B- and alpha 1 D-adrenoreceptors in a manner that controls their expression and cellular localization (
Pupo and Minneman, 2003). However, the C-tail of alpha 1-A adrenoreceptor, which lacks a similar motif, was unable to bind gC1qR (
Pupo and Minneman, 2003). Similarly, employing the yeast two-hybrid analysis method, precipitation assays using glutathione-S-transferase fusion proteins, and reciprocal immunoprecipitations, it was shown that gC1qR specifically binds to protein kinase μ (PKCμ) (
Storz et al., 2000). However, while gC1qR binds to the kinase domain of PKCμ, it does not serve as a substrate (
Storz et al., 2000). On the basis of these findings, it was proposed that gC1qR is part of an intracellular receptor that retains PKCμ at intracellular compartments such as mitochondria, and serves as a regulator of its kinase activity (
Storz et al., 2000).
In other studies, it was demonstrated that the C-terminal cytoplasmic tail of membrane type-1 metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP), a key enzyme primarily recruited to the leading edge of migrating tumor cells, binds to gC1qR (
Rozanov et al., 2002). Although a direct functional link between these two proteins remains to be investigated more thoroughly, this observation suggests that the transient association of gC1qR with the cytoplasmic tail of MT1-MMP is likely to be involved in the mechanisms regulating presentation of the protease at the tumor cell surface where gC1qR expression has been shown to be enhanced in a tumor cell-specific manner (
Rubinstein et al., 2004).
The localization of gC1qR gene to chromosome 17p13.3 (
Guo et al., 1997), where several tumor suppressor genes deleted in ovarian cancer - distinct from Tp53 - are also located had also prompted us to question whether gC1qR plays a role in carcinogenesis. This hypothesis was put to the test by experiments in which a combinatorial immunoglobulin (Ig) library of 10
10 clones was first generated from the cDNA of primary breast adenocarcinoma cells (
Rubinstein et al., 2004). Following subtractive panning, the library was enriched for Ig (Fab fragment) binding to intact adenocarcinoma cells and the resultant Fab was screened against a cDNA expression library generated from breast cancer cells. Using this approach, clones were isolated from the cDNA library expressing gC1qR. Sequencing of the gene encoding tumor-associated gC1qR did not reveal any consistent tumor-specific mutations (
Rubinstein et al., 2004). However, histochemical staining with anti-gC1qR monoclonal antibody demonstrated marked differential expression of gC1qR in thyroid, colon, pancreatic, gastric, esophageal, and lung adenocarcinomas as compared to non-malignant histologic counterparts (
Rubinstein et al., 2004). In contrast, differential expression was not seen in endometrial, renal, and prostate carcinomas. Although gC1qR is expressed in non-malignant breast tissue, its expression increased significantly in breast carcinoma (
Rubinstein et al., 2004). The precise relationship of gC1qR to carcinogenesis is as yet unclear. However, the finding of tumor overexpression in this study and the known multivalent binding of gC1qR to not only C1q but also to a variety of circulating plasma proteins, and involvement in cell-to-cell interactions suggest that gC1qR may have a role in tumor metastases and potentially serve in molecule-specific targeting of malignant cells (
Rubinstein et al., 2004).
Cell surface gC1qR has also been shown to provide a site for
L. monocytogenes, a gram-positive bacterial pathogen responsible for severe food-borne, opportunistic infections especially in immunocompromised humans and animals (
Braun et al., 2000;
Niemann et al., 2004;
Pizzaro-Cerdà et al., 2004). A process in which non-phagocytic cells are converted to become phagocytic by activation of signaling pathways mediates entry of listeria into cells. This process in turn, is mediated by interaction between two closely related bacterial surface proteins or virulence factors designated Internalin A (InlA) and InlB with molecules on the surface of the target cell (
Braun et al., 2000;
Pizzaro-Cerdà et al., 2004). While InlA binds to the adhesion molecule E-cadherin to promote invasion of enterocytes in crossing the intestinal barrier, InlB is postulated to play a significant role in the dissemination and infection of a wide range of cells and tissues by binding to and activation of the receptor tyrosine kinase Met (c-Met), which is also the receptor for hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) (
Shen et al., 2000;
Jonquieres et al., 2001;
Marino et al., 2002). However, in addition to c-Met, InlB also binds to gC1qR (
Braun et al., 2000) and heparan sulfate proteoglycans (
Jonquieres et al., 2001). The interaction of InlB with gC1qR is specific and dose-dependent, and invasion of listeria can be inhibited by either anti-gC1qR or C1q. Furthermore, transfection of a guinea pig cell line that is non-permissive to listeria infection was made to be permissive by transfection with human gC1qR and the uptake involves tyrosine phosphorylation of the adaptor proteins Gab1, Cbl, and Shc and activation of phosphatidyl inositol 3-kinase (
Braun et al., 2000). The binding site for gC1qR has been localized to the GW (Gly-Trp) modules (
Jonquieres et al., 2001;
Marino et al., 2002) and addition of gC1qR to listeria leads to the release of InlB from the bacterial cell surface (
Marino et al., 2002). Although the exact role of gC1qR in InlB-mediated uptake still needs to be further defined, its ability to induce signaling is likely to involve an as yet unidentified signaling partner on the target cell surface including possibly c-Met itself.
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is another pathogen that employs gC1qR to subvert the immune response (
Kittleson et al., 2000). HCV infection is a serious and growing threat to human health. Its ability to efficiently establish persistent infection is postulated to be in part due to T cell suppression and is mediated via interaction between the HCV core protein and gC1qR (
Yao et al., 2003), in a manner that is similar to the C1q-mediated T cell anti proliferative response reported previously (
Chen et al., 1994). The specificity of the C1q- and HCV core-mediated T cell suppression was shown by inhibition studies using anti-gC1qR antibodies or by treatment of the T cells with gC1qR-silencing siRNA (
Yao et al., 2003). More recently obtained data suggest that the HCV core/gC1qR interaction arrests T cell cycle progression through stabilization of the cell cycle inhibitor p27
Kip1, thus blocking activated T cells for the G
1 to S phase transition and inhibiting T cell proliferation (
Yao et al., 2003). Additionally, HCV core isolates from chronic patients were shown to bind gC1qR more efficiently and inhibit T cell proliferation more than their resolved isolates both in humans and chimpanzees (
Yao et al., 2005;
Yao et al., 2006).
These examples serve to demonstrate the potential regulatory role of intracellular and cell surface gC1qR, and collectively support the postulate that the differential cellular localization of this molecule may dictate or contribute to its compartment-specific function as a regulator of cellular and microbial proteins.