PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Exp Neurol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 September 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2000860
NIHMSID: NIHMS30471

Reinnervation of the Tibialis Anterior Following Sciatic Nerve Crush Injury: A Confocal Microscopic Study in Transgenic Mice

Abstract

Transgenic mice whose axons and Schwann cells express fluorescent chromophores enable new imaging techniques and augment concepts in developmental neurobiology. The utility of these tools in the study of traumatic nerve injury depends on employing nerve models that are amenable to microsurgical manipulation and gauging functional recovery. Motor recovery from sciatic nerve crush injury is studied here by evaluating motor endplates of the tibialis anterior muscle, which is innervated by the deep peroneal branch of the sciatic nerve. Following sciatic nerve crush, the deep surface of the tibialis anterior muscle is examined using whole mount confocal microscopy, and reinnervation is characterized by imaging fluorescent axons or Schwann cells (SCs). One week following sciatic crush injury, 100% of motor endplates are denervated with partial reinnervation at two weeks, hyperinnervation at three and four weeks, and restoration of a 1:1 axon to motor endplate relationship six weeks after injury. Walking track analysis reveals progressive recovery of sciatic nerve function by six weeks. SCs reveal reduced S100 expression within two weeks of denervation, correlating with regression to a more immature phenotype. Reinnervation of SCs restores S100 expression and a fully differentiated phenotype. Following denervation, there is altered morphology of circumscribed terminal Schwann cells demonstrating extensive process formation between adjacent motor endplates. The thin, uniformly innervated tibialis anterior muscle is well suited for studying motor reinnervation following sciatic nerve injury. Confocal microscopy may be performed coincident with other techniques of assessing nerve regeneration and functional recovery.

Keywords: transgenic mice, chromophore, sciatic nerve crush, motor endplate

Introduction

Sciatic nerve crush is the most commonly studied nerve injury paradigm and has been used to test numerous neuroregenerative therapeutic modalities (Akassoglou, et al., 2002, Contreras, et al., 1995, Le, et al., 2005, Le, et al., 2005, Myckatyn and MacKinnon, 2004, Schiaveto De Souza, et al., 2004, Steiner, et al., 1997). Outcome measures following injuries to the sciatic nerve or its branches include histology, histomorphometry, electron microscopy, immunohistochemistry, nerve conduction, single motor unit potentials, and assessments of functional recovery (Gillingwater, et al., 2004, Inserra, et al., 1998, Kanaya, et al., 1996, Le, et al., 2005, Le, et al., 2005, Munro, et al., 1998, Nichols, et al., 2005, Schiaveto De Souza, et al., 2004, Terris, et al., 1999). Indirect measures of reinnervation following nerve injury include gauging muscle force and power production and assessing functional recovery using walking track analysis (Aydin, et al., 2004, Cederna, et al., 2000, Kobayashi, et al., 1997, Urbanchek, et al., 1999, Yoshimura, et al., 1999, Yoshimura, et al., 2002). These indirect measures of functional recovery, however, have limited sensitivity and vary not only with motor endplate reinnervation, but with cortical control of limb movement, post-operative stiffness, and the influences of a learning curve (Dellon and Mackinnon, 1989, Nichols, et al., 2005). Previously described techniques for measuring muscle force and power require specialized equipment, depend on the quality of muscle being innervated, and take place in an ex vivo environment (Cederna, et al., 2000, Yoshimura, et al., 1999, Yoshimura, et al., 2002).

More direct in vivo evaluation of axonal regeneration and motor endplate reinnervation can be done using recently developed transgenic mice whose axons (Feng, et al., 2000), or Schwann cells (SCs) (Zuo, et al., 2004), constitutively express chromophores. Direct evaluation of axons and SCs in vivo has primarily been performed in small, thin muscles like the sternomastoid, or platysma, where labeled axons of the spinal accessory nerve, or cervical branch of the facial nerve, can be serially evaluated (Feng, et al., 2000, Kang H, 2000, Nguyen, et al., 2002, O'Malley JP, 1999, Zuo, et al., 2004). Additionally, sequential in vivo live imaging has been done on dissected muscle whole mounts (Walsh and Lichtman, 2003, Pan et al. 2003). Unfortunately, small caliber nerves, like the spinal accessory and delicate facial nerve branches, are not easy to surgically manipulate. A larger caliber nerve, such as the sciatic, is required to maximize the utility of these transgenic chromophore- expressing mice for the study of traumatic nerve injury.

As the sciatic nerve branches proximally into the tibial nerve and common peroneal nerve, several corresponding muscle groups are available for assessing recovery following nerve injury. The tibial nerve innervates the ankle plantar flexors, including the gastrocnemius and soleus muscles, but these muscles have limited utility in studying motor reinnervation following sciatic or tibial nerve crush injury. One issue is that these plantar flexors are innervated along their deep surface, and require eversion of their thick muscle tissue to visualize motor endplates. Unfortunately, this eversion requires dissection and separation of various posterior compartment muscles (Myckatyn, et al., 2004). Even when meticulously performed, this manipulation leads to scar tissue that impairs imaging of the deep muscle surface. Separating muscle compartments also adversely affects normal functional recovery, which often serves as an outcome measure following the treatment of nerve injury. Lastly, the dense innervation of the soleus and gastrocnemius leads to overlap of motor endplates, terminal axons, and SCs during visualization, thus precluding independent characterization of these discrete structures during both vital and whole mount imaging. In this study, we have transitioned to using the long, thin, tibialis anterior muscle, which is innervated by the deep peroneal branch of the sciatic nerve. The tibialis anterior affords reproducible identification and imaging secondary to a band of motor endplates along its transverse axis.

To facilitate whole mount imaging, our study utilizes two distinct transgenic murine lines. We utilize the thy1-YFP(16) line that constitutively expresses yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) in nearly all axons in order to evaluate temporal patterns of motor endplate reinnervation and axonal branching following nerve injury (Feng, et al., 2000). We have also bred thy1-CFP(23) mice whose axons constitutively express cyan fluorescent protein (CFP) to S100-GFP mice whose mature, differentiated Schwann cells (SCs) robustly express green fluorescent protein (GFP), and whose denervated and immature SCs have diminished or absent fluorescence (Jessen and Mirsky, 2005, Zuo, et al., 2004). This double transgenic line enables visualization of the dynamic relationship between SCs and regenerating axons.

The purpose of this study is to directly visualize the course of muscle reinnervation after crush injury with respect to both axons and SCs, and to establish baseline data for the commonly used sciatic crush traumatic nerve injury paradigm. Direct visualization enables us to study: (1) the rate of motor endplate reinnervation over time, (2) the number of terminal branches contacting a given motor endplate, (3) the number of terminal SCs (TSCs) expressing S100, and (4) the intensity of S100 expression before and after injury. We propose that adaptation of imaging techniques designed to study the development of the peripheral nervous system will also have significant utility for testing any new neuroregenerative therapies after traumatic nerve injury.

Methods

Transgenic Mice

Homozygous thy1-YFP(16) mice (n=15), commercially available through Jackson Laboratories (Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, Maine), express YFP in almost all peripheral sensory and motor fibers (including nerve terminals), and allow for direct visualization of axons following nerve injury. Additionally, the distribution and morphology of mature, differentiated SCs is assessed in S100-GFP mice, (generous gift from Dr. W. Thompson, University of Texas, Austin, now available through Jackson Laboratories) which utilize the S100B promoter to drive GFP expression (Allore RJ, 1990, Castets F, 1997, Jiang H, 1993, Ludwin SK, 1976, Stefansson K, 1982, Zuo, et al., 2004). S100-GFP mice (n=15), are also bred to thy1-CFP(23) mice (Jackson Laboratories) to produce thy1-CFP(23)/S100-GFP offspring that express cyan fluorescent protein (CFP) in their axons and GFP in their SCs (Feng, et al., 2000) (n=10). The presence of the GFP transgene is confirmed by observing green fluorescent protein expression in the retina under fluorescent light. The presence of the CFP transgene in heterozygous thy1-CFP(23) mice is determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using genomic DNA extracted from mouse tail specimens. The primers used for PCR are recommended by the distributor. The mice are maintained in a central animal housing facility, and all described procedures are performed according to protocols approved by the Division of Comparative Medicine at Washington University School of Medicine.

Surgical Procedure

Adult animals are anesthetized for surgery with subcutaneous injections of ketamine (75 mg/kg) and medetomidine (100 mg/kg). The right hindquarter is then carefully shaved and depilation completed with generic Nair hair removal cream (Church and Dwight, Co., Inc.) prior to skin cleansing with Betadine swabs. The skin is incised 1 mm posterior and parallel to the femur, and the biceps femoris is bluntly split under 16x magnification to expose the sciatic nerve. The sciatic nerve is then crushed 5 mm proximal to its trifurcation with No. 5 Jeweler's forceps for 30 seconds (Bridge, et al., 1994), followed by wound irrigation and closure of the muscle with 6-0 vicryl, and closure of the skin with interrupted 6-0 nylon sutures. Animals recover on a heated surface and anesthesia is reversed with atipamezole hydrochloride (1mg/kg). Upon evaluation, animals are anesthetized, reshaved, and transcardially perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4). The tibialis anterior and distal 5 mm of the deep peroneal nerve are mobilized with careful dissection, placed on a Sylgard resin coated dish (Dow Corning), washed with PBS, and stained with alpha-bungarotoxin Alexa Fluor-594 (10 μg/ml; Invitrogen) for 30 minutes at room temperature. After washing with PBS, the whole muscle is mounted under a coverslip in Vectashield (Vector Laboratories) for confocal imaging.

Motor Endplate Evaluation

The mobilized tibialis anterior muscle is stained with alpha-bungarotoxin conjugated to Alexa 594 (Molecular Probes, OR) to label motor endplates. Vectashield mounting medium with the nuclear stain DAPI is used to identify the presence of any nucleated cells and ensures that GFP expression by S100-GFP mice is not related to background fluorescence or debris. The entire muscle is then placed on a glass slide with a coverslip to facilitate whole mount imaging. The deep surface of the muscle is imaged using standard fluorescent filters under low magnification to survey the muscle surface before performing confocal microscopy of nerve terminals and endplates.

The confocal microscope used in the study is equipped with a multi-line argon laser (458nm, 488nm, and 515nm), diode lasers (405nm and 561nm), and a helium-neon laser (633nm) (Olympus FV1000). Images of YFP-labeled axons are obtained by defining the spectral detection window at 515 nm. To further evaluate chromophores of interest, spectral detection is set to image CFP-labeled axons (458 nm), GFP expressing SCs (488 nm), motor endplates (568 nm), and DAPI-labeled nuclei (405 nm). To discern CFP-labeled axons from GFP-labeled axons, two methods are employed. In the first, the slit after the diffraction grating in front of the photomultiplier tube is modulated (narrowed through the Olympus FV 1000 software) to capture emissions exclusively from a narrow 20 nm bandwidth at the peak of the two emission profiles. In addition, the emission profiles of the CFP and GFP chromophores are independently plotted and a spectral unmixing algorithm is employed to differentiate them using Olympus FV 1000 software.

These images are then compiled to fashion motor endplate reinnervation maps for uninjured control animals (t=0), and at one, two, three, four and six weeks after crush injury. To evaluate the irregular surface of the muscle, a z-series of images taken 5 μm apart is flattened into a two-dimensional image. At each time point, motor endplates captured within 25 randomly sampled areas of 100 μm2 are evaluated. Calibrated regions of interest are then established to quantify: (1) the number of completely denervated motor endplates, (2) the number of synaptic terminal axons associated with a single motor endplate (with proximal axonal projection intact throughout the entire field of view), (3) the number of TSCs expressing S100 as determined by the GFP reporter at motor endplates, and (4) GFP intensity in these SCs.

GFP reporter intensity is also measured in peripheral SCs, which are defined as any SC not physically contacting a motor endplate, as opposed to TSCs which are associated with a motor endplate. To quantify GFP intensity, standardized regions of interest are created within SC boundaries, and intensity measurements are recorded for twenty SCs per image. Intensity measurements are reflective of gray scale units, with a spectral range of 0 (minimum) to 4095 (maximum). To subtract background signal, regions of interest outside of imaged structures are selected and averaged using the software (Olympus Fluoview, version 1.5) and then subtracted from Schwann cell intensity values. This ensures that measured intensity is attributable to SCs rather than the baseline detector readout, scattered fluorescence, or autofluorescence. Background fluorescence can be affected by different whole mount thicknesses and surface topographies.

To ascertain whether the absence of S100-labeled terminal SCs at the motor endplate results from migration, demise, or dedifferentiation, the persistence of DAPI labeled nuclei at motor endplates is assessed. Persistence of DAPI-labeled nuclei with the eventual renewal of S100 co-expression upon reinnervation suggests restoration of a mature SC phenotype (Son and Thompson, 1995, Son, et al., 1996). S100 expression is robust in mature SCs, but can be reduced or absent in immature SCs (Fornaro, et al., 2001, Jessen and Mirsky, 2005).

Walking Track Analysis

Prior to perfusion and sacrifice, the hind paws are dipped in developer solution and the mice walk down a 20x3 cm corridor lined with undeveloped x-ray paper. Complete footprints are used to measure print length on the uninjured or normal side (NPL) and the crushed or experimental side (EPL). Print length is measured from the distal most toe print to the proximal aspect of the heel print on a calibrated SummaSketch II Plus digitizing tablet (Summagraphics, Cal Comp Input Technologies). Toe spread, measured as the distance between the first and fifth toes, is similarly recorded from the uninjured (NTS) and experimental (ETS) prints. Sciatic functional indices are then calculated using the formula SFI = 118.9 [(ETS-NTS)/NTS] − 51.2 [(EPL-NPL)/NPL] − 7.5 (Inserra, et al. 1998).

Statistical Analysis

In the analysis of confocal images, investigators have previously counted the number of terminal axons per motor endplate and the ratio of innervated vs. denervated endplates (Nguyen, et al., 1998). In our study, two independent investigators analyze whole mount confocal z-series images of the tibialis anterior muscle in control animals, and following sciatic nerve crush at one, two, three, four, and six week time points to record all previously described quantifiable parameters. For counting, images are taken using a 20x objective (N.A. 0.75) and with the higher power 40x (N.A. 0.90) and 60x (N.A. 1.42, oil) objectives to inspect synapses at greater magnification. Images are then analyzed via the Olympus FV100 software (Olympus Fluoview, version 1.5) using regions of interest and digital zoom for ultrastructure visualization (Olympus FV1000). Multiply innervated synapses were distinguished from sprouted synapses by scanning through the z-series of muscle whole mounts, and following axons to their most distal point in a specimen, in addition to obtaining images using higher power objectives. Data obtained from each investigator is compiled and interrater reliability established using Statistica version 6.0 (Statsoft Inc., Tulsa, Oklahoma), with only two of thirty parameters yielding significant (p<0.05) differences between raters. Counts from each investigator are then averaged, and time points following crush injury are compared to one another to evaluate for significant differences using Student's t-test. In the analysis of the walking track data, a mean SFI with standard deviation is calculated for each experimental time point and significant differences confirmed following performance of a one-way analysis of variance.

Results

Axon Counts

Adult thy1-YFP(16) mice are characterized by 1:1 relationships between terminal axons and motor endplates. Following sciatic nerve crush injury, this relationship becomes dynamic, as imaged nerve terminals are completely denervated after one week following injury, partially reinnervated at two weeks, hyperinnervated at three and four weeks, and return to a 1:1 terminal axon to motor endplate ratio by six weeks, as noted in Table 1. Shown in Figures Figures1A1A and and2A,2A, 100% of endplates are singly innervated prior to injury (t=0), while 100% are denervated one week after nerve crush (Figs (Figs1B1B&2A). Two weeks after crush injury, 27.7 ± 3.7% are singly innervated, 3.3 ±0.5% are dually innervated and the rest remain denervated (Figs (Figs1C1C&2A). By three weeks (Figs (Figs1D1D&2A), all are innervated (54.9 ± 3.7% singly, 45.1 ± 3.1% dually), while at four weeks 66.2 ± 3.3% are singly innervated and 31.3±2.9% are dually innervated (Figs (Figs1E1E&2A). By six weeks, 100% are singly innervated and resemble controls (Figs (Figs1F1F&2A). In no case are three or more terminal axons associated with a single motor endplate in the crush injury paradigm. There are no statistically significant differences in the degree of dual innervation between three and four weeks post crush. The number of singly innervated motor endplates seen at three and four weeks is significantly less than uninjured controls (p<0.001 and p<0.005, respectively) and animals that are six weeks post-injury (p<0.001 and p< 0.05, respectively).

Figure 1
A. Confocal imaging of the tibialis anterior shows that motor endplates are singly innervated by terminal axons in uninjured adult mice. Axons are constitutively labeled with YFP in thy1-YFP(16) mice, while Alexa 594-bungarotoxin labeled acetylcholine ...
Figure 2
A. The percentage of endplates that are either denervated, or reinnervated with one or two axons is shown before crush injury and up to 6 weeks after injury. B. Functional recovery following sciatic crush injury is correlated to the sciatic functional ...
Table 1
Schwann cell-axonal relationships of the tibialis anterior muscle following sciatic nerve crush injury.

Schwann Cell Counts and Intensity

In uninjured control specimens of the mouse tibialis anterior muscle, the number of TSCs per endplate with detectable S100 expression approximates a 3:1 ratio (2.9 ±1.0 TSCs per endplate, Table 1). One week following nerve crush, this number decreases to 1.7 ± 1.2 TSCs per endplate (p<0.001 compared to control). From two to four weeks following crush injury, the number of visualized TSCs expressing S100 per endplate increases, and peaks at four weeks with 3.8 ±1.4 TSCs per endplate (p<0.001 compared to control). By six weeks after crush injury, the TSC/endplate ratio (2.8 ±1.0) is not significantly different than control numbers.

GFP signal intensity is proportional to S100B promoter activity in S100-GFP mice (Zuo, et al., 2004), and signal changes are noted in all mice following sciatic nerve crush injury. In uninjured control animals, TSCs express GFP with significantly (p<0.001) more intensity (852.2 ± 401.5 gray scale units) than SCs in the periphery (252.1 ± 102.3 gray scale units). Following injury, the intensity measurements of TSCs (Table 1) demonstrate a decrease until three weeks post crush, at which time a robust signal increase is noted. Thereafter, there is a downward trend in signal intensity from three to four weeks, whereupon signal intensity approximates control levels. Compared to control TSC intensity measurements, values at one and two weeks post nerve crush are both significantly different (p <0.003 and p <0.0001, respectively). There are no significant differences between intensity levels at four and six weeks post crush compared with the uninjured control. Of note, there is a significant difference between independent investigator measurements of TSC intensity at three weeks, with mean values reported as 1121.1 ± 376.7 gray scale units by one evaluator, and 1387.6 ± 466.9 gray scale units by the other.

Peripheral SC S100 expression also changes in response to sciatic nerve crush injury (Fig 3A-F). One week after crush injury, GFP intensity increases (p < 0.001 compared to controls), followed by a decrease at two weeks (p < 0.05) and peak at three weeks. After three weeks, GFP intensity decreases at four and six weeks (Table 1). The SC intensity in the periphery six weeks after sciatic crush injury is not significantly different than control values. Of note, there is a significant difference between independent investigator measurements of peripheral SC intensity one week after nerve crush, with mean values reported by each as 822.7 ± 293.0 gray scale units and 536.0 ± 303.3 gray scale units, respectively.

Figure 3
A. Confocal image of uninjured tibialis anterior muscle demonstrates mature peripheral SCs and TSCs. B. One week after crush injury, there are qualitatively fewer TSCs expressing S100, and those that are present are less bright. Peripheral SCs possess ...

Although the fluorescence of SCs at the nerve terminal is dynamic following nerve injury, DAPI labeling confirms the presence of any nucleated cells in proximity to motor endplates (Fig 4B-F). One week following nerve crush injury, there is a paucity of DAPI-labeled cells noted at the motor endplates (Fig 4C), coinciding with a reduction in GFP-labeled TSCs overall (Table 1). Two weeks after injury, the number of DAPI- and GFP-labeled cells increases, but the intensity of GFP expression is still reduced (Fig 4D, Table 1). Based on colocalization of GFP expression with DAPI staining, peripheral SC hyperproliferation is noted 1-2 mm proximal to the motor endplates two weeks following crush injury (Figure 4E) before dropping back to baseline levels four weeks after injury (Figure 4F). By four weeks, the number of TSCs per endplate is increased beyond pre-injury levels while the intensity of GFP expression approaches pre-injury levels (Fig 4F, Table 1).

Figure 4
A. Thy1-CFP(23)/S100-GFP mice combine the SC and terminal axon characteristics seen in single transgenic mice. Quantitative assessment, however, is exclusively performed on the single transgenic mice to reduce the interrater variability that occurs with ...

Concurrent observation of the location and distribution of TSCs and axons is possible via confocal imaging of thy1-CFP(23)/S100-GFP mice (Fig 4A). Quantitative assessment, however, is exclusively performed on single transgenic thy1-YFP mice in this study, as YFP-labeled axons are brighter and more easily counted than CFP axons. Also, GFP-labeled SCs obscure CFP-labeled axons in some cases, even with the implementation of spectral unmixing algorithms (as described in motor endplate evaluation).

Walking Track Analysis

There is no validated test that specifically measures functional recovery following denervation of the tibialis anterior muscle. Functional recovery following sciatic nerve injury, however, can be monitored by calculating the sciatic functional index (SFI), which includes weighted contributions from print length and toe spread. The SFI is scaled such that -100 represents a complete nerve injury and 0 represents normal function (George, et al., 2003, Inserra, 1998, Yao, 1998). The walking track data demonstrates no difference between experimental and control SFI prior to injury, followed by a substantial decrement in sciatic function following crush injury with statistically significant improvements (p <0.05) relative to the preceding time point noted at 2 and 4 weeks (Fig 2B). This correlates with the time to reinnervation of the tibialis anterior observed in imaging studies with early evidence of reinnervation of some endplates first noted at 2 weeks and ~99% with at least single innervation by 4 weeks. Plantar flexion, as demonstrated by restoration of print length, demonstrates statistically significant improvements over preceding time points 3, 4, and 6 weeks after injury.

Discussion

We aim to establish a model for studying motor endplate reinnervation following traumatic nerve injury, and to report baseline data relevant to the timing and extent of axonal reinnervation, functional recovery, SC distribution, and S100 expression during regeneration. Transgenic mice, whose axons constitutively express fluorescent chromophores, provide a remarkably useful tool for the study of developmental neurobiology in the peripheral nervous system (Feng, et al., 2000, Nguyen, et al., 2002, Pan, et al., 2003, Walsh and Lichtman, 2003). Previous investigations have expanded the utility of these mice to study the rate of nerve regeneration via imaging of both sensory and motor reinnervation. The saphenous sensory nerve has been transcutaneously imaged, and patterns of motor endplate reinnervation have been evaluated by crushing or transecting the small motor branches of the sternomastoid or platysma muscles (Nguyen, et al., 2002, Pan, et al., 2003). In the study of traumatic nerve injuries, larger caliber nerves are more amenable to technically sound and reproducible surgical manipulation, and include the sciatic nerve and its branches (Aguayo, et al., 1977, Genden, et al., 2002, Gillingwater and Ribchester, 2003, Gillingwater, et al., 2004, Inserra, et al., 2000, Le, et al., 2005, Myckatyn and MacKinnon, 2004, Naveilhan, et al., 1997), the femoral nerve (Eberhardt, et al., 2006, Martini, et al., 1994, Mears, et al., 2003) and the primary branches of the facial nerve (Ferri, et al., 1998, Sendtner, et al., 1997). Although we have previously imaged the facial mimetics to study the effects of facial nerve injury, and the soleus, gastrocnemius, and tibialis posterior muscles to study the effects of sciatic crush injury (data not shown), the long, thin tibialis anterior muscle has become our muscle of choice since it is innervated by the deep peroneal branch of the sciatic nerve and allows for whole mount confocal microscopy. Additionally, its evaluation does not preclude other modalities of evaluating nerve regeneration. Following sciatic nerve injury, histomorphometry, nerve conduction studies, muscle physiology, and functional assessment can still be performed on the other regenerating branches of the sciatic nerve.

Following sciatic nerve crush in thy1-YFP16 mice, we report that at one week following injury, 100% of endplates are denervated, as shown by areas of clear discontinuity between the axon and its endplate in neuromuscular whole mounts. Denervation is also demonstrated at this time point by some axons making distal contact with endplates, but lacking proximal continuity. The presence of incongruent distally-intact terminal axons contacting their endplates likely illustrates the “compartmental” theory of (Fig 1B-C) neurodegeneration, in that the neuronal soma, projecting axon, and synaptic terminal axon all degenerate via separate and distinct processes (Araki, et al., 2004, Gillingwater and Ribchester, 2001, Gillingwater and Ribchester, 2003). By two weeks, some continuous axons are seen, suggesting that concomitant regeneration and degeneration take place at this time point. Amorphous fluorescing YFP labeled-material is seen at both one and two weeks following sciatic nerve crush and likely represents the incomplete phagocytosis of neural elements (Pan, et al., 2003).

Motor endplate recovery in the tibialis anterior is first noted two weeks following sciatic crush injury (0.4 ± 0.6 axon: endplate ratio) with hyperinnervation noted three (1.4 ±0.6) and four (1.3 ± 0.5) weeks later. Restoration of a 1:1 axon to endplate relationship resembling uninjured controls is uniformly noted by six weeks, and is consistent with the regenerative specificity with which axons reach their target endplates when endoneurial tubes remain intact following nerve crush (Lichtman and Sanes, 2003, Nguyen, et al., 2002). Although other investigators have reported polyinnervation of motor endplates up to 6 weeks following tibial nerve crush (with a mean of 2.3 inputs per endplate), our data differs in that four and six weeks are evaluated as separate time points (with statistically significant differences between the two), instead of being grouped together (Gillingwater, et al., 2004). Our study reveals a clear selection of a dominant nerve terminal by six weeks. Additionally, the distance from the crush site to target motor endplates, and therefore the amount of time required for reinnervation may also contribute to variations in data obtained.

Improved functional recovery is the sine qua non for any neuroregenerative therapy accompanying reconstructive nerve surgery (Hadlock, et al., 2005, Hadlock, et al., 1999, Inserra, et al., 1998, Jabaley, et al., 1976, Lin, et al., 1996, Nichols, et al., 2005, Varejao, et al., 2003, Varejao, et al., 2001, Varejao, et al., 2004, Yu, et al., 2001). For the sciatic nerve or its branches, walking track analysis is a validated functional assay (Bain, et al., 1989, Beirowski, et al., 2004, Brown, et al., 1991, Brown, et al., 1989, de Medinaceli, et al., 1982, George, et al., 2003, Inserra, et al., 1998). The tibialis anterior muscle - an extrinsic dorsiflexor of the ankle - lacks a validated test to monitor functional recovery. However, the sciatic functional index (SFI) provides an accurate indicator of sciatic neuronal recovery following denervating injury. Obtaining imaging studies together with SFI throughout the course of sciatic nerve regeneration allows for correlation between endplate reinnervation and the recovery of muscle function. The morphologic data presented here demonstrate that 100% of motor endplates are denervated at one week following a sciatic nerve crush injury. At two weeks, 68% of endplates remain denervated, correlating with the finding of a statistically detectable but only modest improvement in the SFI at the two week time point. Hyperinnervation of motor endplates at three weeks, together with incomplete functional recovery, likely represents immaturity of endplates with ongoing synaptic competition. As expected based on the reinnervation data, the SFI improves significantly by four weeks, and approaches normal values by six weeks.

Incomplete functional recovery during a period of hyperinnervation is expected. Previous work on tibial nerve crush injury suggests that although motor endplates may be transiently hyperinnervated, they are not hyperfunctional (Gillingwater, et al., 2004). Synaptic activity is not a prerequisite for motor endplate reinnervation following sciatic nerve injury (Costanzo, et al., 2000). However, in the setting of hyperinnervation, synaptic activity has been shown to contribute to the outcome of competition between axons (Buffelli, et al., 2003). The vast majority of research on synapse activity, formation, elimination, and stabilization, however, relates to the recapitulation of development by adult mouse neuronal cells following nerve injury (Lichtman and Colman, 2000). Evidence regarding neuromuscular development demonstrates that synaptic competition is likely dictated by trophic support from postsynaptic cells and activity between a terminal axon and its motor unit (Callaway, et al., 1987, Ridge and Betz, 1984), in addition to stabilization and maturation of the neuromuscular junction (Eusebio, et al., 2003, Jaworski and Burden, 2006, Lin, et al., 2001, Pun, et al., 2002, Sanes and Lichtman, 2001). Presumably, motor function is complete when the dominant synapse matures and the non-dominant synapse is eliminated.

The dynamics of neuromuscular recovery following nerve injury encompasses changes in SC behavior and morphology, as well. It is known that SCs optimize the extracellular environment around peripheral nerves by demonstrating a considerable degree of plasticity (Jessen and Mirsky, 2005). In the uninjured state, mature SCs exist in a myelinating or non-myelinating state, characterized by a specific complement of transcription factors (Le, et al., 2005, Le, et al., 2005), signaling proteins (Ogata, et al., 2004), and extracellular markers (Taveggia, et al., 2005). Additionally, the expression of S100B, among other proteins, is strongly expressed in mature SCs, but is significantly downregulated in immature SCs and their precursors (Fornaro, et al., 2001, Jessen and Mirsky, 2005). In the uninjured state, both peripheral (non-terminal) SCs and TSCs associated with the tibialis anterior strongly express S100, but the level of expression is at least three times as strong in TSCs (252.1 ± 102.3 versus 852.2 ± 401.5 gray scale units, respectively).

Our study confirms the dynamic nature of SC populations at the nerve terminal following injury. At baseline, TSCs are intimately associated with motor endplates in a ~2-3:1 ratio (TSC number: endplate), providing a “glial cap” that buffers the extracellular milieu at the neuromuscular junction (NMJ) and modulates its function (Robitaille, 1998) (Reddy L., 2003) (Kang, et al., 2003). The number of TSCs at an endplate correlates to endplate size, age, and the muscle in question, with each cell projecting processes that cover the NMJ (Lubischer and Bebinger, 1999, Zuo, et al., 2004).

In response to denervation, the population and morphology of SCs changes, as SCs demonstrate the ability to revert from their mature myelinating or non-myelinating phenotypes, to assume promyelinating or migratory phenotypes (Jessen and Mirsky, 2005). At this time, TSCs surround and phagocytose degenerating fragments of terminal axons (Miledi, 1970, Miledi, 1968) and project long processes that can penetrate muscle (Reynolds and Woolf, 1992). One week following sciatic nerve crush, an abrupt decline in TSC numbers is noted, and may be caused by the migration of TSCs from denervated NMJs, a complete lack of S100 promoter activity, or cell death. It is known that GFP expression may persist for greater than one week in injured and degenerating axons that constitutively express fluorescent proteins, and may also remain after the SCs previously expressing this protein have died (Pan, et al., 2003). We surmise, then, that the lack of GFP expression and nuclear staining at motor endplates one week following injury is most consistent with migration of SCs away from the endplates and cell death (Weinberg and Spencer, 1978). Consistent with these findings, previous work has shown that SCs will abandon previous synaptic sites following denervation, and that over time, SC-deprived endplates result in a reduction in receptor area (Kang and Thompson, 2002). Restoration of TSC number at the NMJ is seen by two weeks (2.9 ± 1.0) and exceeds baseline numbers four weeks following sciatic nerve crush injury (3.8 TSCs/NMJ), before reverting to control values (2.8 ± 1.0) six weeks after crush injury.

Qualitatively, TSCs possess a relatively circumscribed morphology prior to injury that is restored three to six weeks after the crush (Fig 3A-F). Two weeks following crush injury, numerous interconnections are noted between TSCs, including the extension of GFP-labeled processes between distinct motor (Fig 3C2). These TSC processes can act as substrates for axonal extension (Son and Thompson, 1995, Son, et al., 1996), and previous work suggests that they form a network between adjacent endplates (Kang, et al., 2003, Tian and Thompson, 2002). Previously occupied endoneurial tubes may lead some nerve fibers back to motor endplates, while other axons continue to extend along the TSC process networks. These meandering axonal projections are termed “escaped fibers” and are believed to be strongly influenced by SC guidance during periods of denervation or shortly following reinnervation (Gutmann, 1944, Kang, et al., 2003, Ramon y Cajal, 1928). We note that this SC bridging (Tian and Thompson, 2002), is accompanied by the proliferation of peripheral SCs proximal to the motor endplates two weeks following crush injury (Fig 3C2 and Fig 4E).

Although imaging conditions may affect spectral intensity measurements of the GFP reporter in S100-GFP mice, (Lichtman and Conchello, 2005), S100 promoter activity can still be extrapolated. The diminished expression of GFP intensity in TSCs adjacent to motor endplates at one and two weeks following nerve injury may represent dedifferentiation into a more immature phenotype that does not robustly express S100. The dramatic upregulation of TSC GFP expression by three weeks following nerve crush (beyond baseline levels) coincides with replenished levels of S100 calcium binding protein in mature TSCs. The return of S100 expression to baseline levels by four weeks after the crush injury marks SC maturation.

Increases in peripheral SC signal intensity, particularly in the first week after crush injury may relate to migration of TSCs away from motor endplates and into the periphery and the persistence of GFP protein expression for at least a week after S100 promoter activity is downregulated. The reduction in peripheral SC signal intensity two weeks after crush likely corresponds to SC denervation and dedifferentiation into a promyelinating phenotype. This is supported by the fact that at one and two weeks following crush injury the majority of distal peripheral SCs are clearly denervated based on time-matched imaging of axonal regeneration.

Confocal microscopic evaluation of dynamic changes at the neuromuscular junction in murine models expressing neuronal and SC chromophores expands the armentarium of outcome measures used to assess recovery following traumatic nerve injury. Following sciatic nerve crush, a 1:1 terminal axon to motor endplate ratio is established within six weeks, during which time accompanying SCs demonstrate a series of morphologic and phenotypic changes that ultimately stabilize within this time frame. Further studies using this technique will investigate the effects of various neuroregenerative therapies, reinnervation specificity, and the pattern of SC differentiation following disruptive nerve injuries requiring primary suture or nerve graft repair.

Acknowledgements

This study is funded by the C. James Carrico Faculty Research Fellowship awarded by the American College of Surgeons and the John E. Hoopes American Association of Plastic Surgeons Academic Scholarship awarded to Dr. Myckatyn. It is also funded by the National Institutes of Health RO1 grant NS051706 awarded to Dr. Mackinnon, and a Barnes-Jewish Foundation grant awarded to Drs. Myckatyn and Mackinnon. The authors are grateful to Dr. W. Thompson (University of Texas, Austin) for initially providing the S100-GFP line to Dr. Alexander Parsadanian.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

1. Aguayo AJ, Attiwell M, Trecarten J, Perkins S, Bray GM. Abnormal myelination in transplanted Trembler mouse Schwann cells. Nature. 1977;265:73–75. [PubMed]
2. Akassoglou K, Yu WM, Akpinar P, Strickland S. Fibrin inhibits peripheral nerve remyelination by regulating Schwann cell differentiation. Neuron. 2002;33:861–875. [PubMed]
3. Allore RJ FW, O'Hanlon D, Neilson KM, Baumal R, Dunn RJ, Marks A. Cloning and expression of the human S100 beta gene. J Biol Chem. 1990;265:15537–15543. [PubMed]
4. Araki T, Sasaki Y, Milbrandt J. Increased nuclear NAD biosynthesis and SIRT1 activation prevent axonal degeneration. Science. 2004;305:1010–1013. [PubMed]
5. Aydin MA, Mackinnon SE, Gu XM, Kobayashi J, Kuzon WM., Jr. Force deficits in skeletal muscle after delayed reinnervation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113:1712–1718. [PubMed]
6. Bain JR, Mackinnon SE, Hunter DA. Functional evaluation of complete sciatic, peroneal, and posterior tibial nerve lesions in the rat. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;83:129–138. [PubMed]
7. Beirowski B, Berek L, Adalbert R, Wagner D, Grumme DS, Addicks K, Ribchester RR, Coleman MP. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of Wallerian degeneration using restricted axonal labelling in YFP-H mice. J Neurosci Methods. 2004;134:23–35. [PubMed]
8. Bridge PM, Ball DJ, Mackinnon SE, Nakao Y, Brandt K, Hunter DA, Hertl C. Nerve crush injuries--a model for axonotmesis. Exp Neurol. 1994;127:284–290. [PubMed]
9. Brown CJ, Evans PJ, Mackinnon SE, Bain JR, Makino AP, Hunter DA, Hare G. Inter- and intraobserver reliability of walking-track analysis used to assess sciatic nerve function in rats. Microsurgery. 1991;12:76–79. [PubMed]
10. Brown CJ, Mackinnon SE, Evans PJ, Bain JR, Makino AP, Hunter DA, Hare GM. Self-evaluation of walking-track measurement using a Sciatic Function Index. Microsurgery. 1989;10:226–235. [PubMed]
11. Buffelli M, Burgess RW, Feng G, Lobe CG, Lichtman JW, Sanes JR. Genetic evidence that relative synaptic efficacy biases the outcome of synaptic competition. Nature. 2003;424:430–434. [PubMed]
12. Callaway EM, Soha JM, Van Essen DC. Competition favouring inactive over active motor neurons during synapse elimination. Nature. 1987;328:422–426. [PubMed]
13. Castets F GW, Marks A, Van Eldik LJ. Transcriptional regulation of the human S100 beta gene. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 1997;46:208–216. [PubMed]
14. Cederna PS, Youssef MK, Asato H, Urbanchek MG, Kuzon WM., Jr. Skeletal muscle reinnervation by reduced axonal numbers results in whole muscle force deficits. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:2003–2009. discussion 2010-2001. [PubMed]
15. Contreras PC, Steffler C, Yu E, Callison K, Stong D, Vaught JL. Systemic administration of rhIGF-I enhanced regeneration after sciatic nerve crush in mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1995;274:1443–1449. [PubMed]
16. Costanzo EM, Barry JA, Ribchester RR. Competition at silent synapses in reinnervated skeletal muscle. Nat Neurosci. 2000;3:694–700. [PubMed]
17. de Medinaceli L, Freed WJ, Wyatt RJ. An index of the functional condition of rat sciatic nerve based on measurements made from walking tracks. Exp Neurol. 1982;77:634–643. [PubMed]
18. Dellon AL, Mackinnon SE. Sciatic nerve regeneration in the rat. Validity of walking track assessment in the presence of chronic contractures. Microsurgery. 1989;10:220–225. [PubMed]
19. Eberhardt KA, Irintchev A, Al-Majed AA, Simova O, Brushart TM, Gordon T, Schachner M. BDNF/TrkB signaling regulates HNK-1 carbohydrate expression in regenerating motor nerves and promotes functional recovery after peripheral nerve repair. Exp Neurol. 2006;198:500–510. [PubMed]
20. Eusebio A, Oliveri F, Barzaghi P, Ruegg MA. Expression of mouse agrin in normal, denervated and dystrophic muscle. Neuromuscul Disord. 2003;13:408–415. [PubMed]
21. Feng G, Mellor RH, Bernstein M, Keller-Peck C, Nguyen QT, Wallace M, Nerbonne JM, Lichtman JW, Sanes JR. Imaging neuronal subsets in transgenic mice expressing multiple spectral variants of GFP. Neuron. 2000;28:41–51. [PubMed]
22. Ferri CC, Moore FA, Bisby MA. Effects of facial nerve injury on mouse motoneurons lacking the p75 low- affinity neurotrophin receptor. J Neurobiol. 1998;34:1–9. [PubMed]
23. Fornaro M, Tos P, Geuna S, Giacobini-Robecchi MG, Battiston B. Confocal imaging of Schwann-cell migration along muscle-vein combined grafts used to bridge nerve defects in the rat. Microsurgery. 2001;21:153–155. [PubMed]
24. Genden EM, Watanabe O, Mackinnon SE, Hunter DA, Strasberg SR. Peripheral nerve regeneration in the apolipoprotein-E-deficient mouse. Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. 2002;18:495–502. [PubMed]
25. George LT, Myckatyn TM, Jensen JN, Hunter DA, Mackinnon SE. Functional recovery and histomorphometric assessment following tibial nerve injury in the mouse. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2003;19:41–48. [PubMed]
26. Gillingwater TH, Ribchester RR. Compartmental neurodegeneration and synaptic plasticity in the Wld(s) mutant mouse. J Physiol. 2001;534:627–639. [PubMed]
27. Gillingwater TH, Ribchester RR. The relationship of neuromuscular synapse elimination to synaptic degeneration and pathology: insights from WldS and other mutant mice. J Neurocytol. 2003;32:863–881. [PubMed]
28. Gillingwater TH, Thomson D, Ribchester RR. Myo-GDNF increases non-functional polyinnervation of reinnervated mouse muscle. Neuroreport. 2004;15:21–25. [PubMed]
29. Gutmann E, Young JZ. The re-innervation of muscle after various periods of atrophy. J Anat. 1944;78:15–43. [PubMed]
30. Hadlock TA, Heaton J, Cheney M, Mackinnon SE. Functional recovery after facial and sciatic nerve crush injury in the rat. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2005;7:17–20. [PubMed]
31. Hadlock TA, Koka R, Vacanti JP, Cheney ML. A comparison of assessments of functional recovery in the rat. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 1999;4:258–264. [PubMed]
32. Inserra MM, Bloch DA, Terris DJ. Functional indices for sciatic, peroneal, and posterior tibial nerve lesions in the mouse. Microsurgery. 1998;18:119–124. [PubMed]
33. Inserra MM, Yao M, Murray R, Terris DJ. Peripheral nerve regeneration in interleukin 6-deficient mice. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126:1112–1116. [PubMed]
34. Jabaley ME, Burns JE, Orcutt BS, Bryant M. Comparison of histologic and functional recovery after peripheral nerve repair. Journal of Hand Surgery - American. 1976;1:119–130.
35. Jaworski A, Burden SJ. Neuromuscular synapse formation in mice lacking motor neuron- and skeletal muscle-derived Neuregulin-1. J Neurosci. 2006;26:655–661. [PubMed]
36. Jessen KR, Mirsky R. The origin and development of glial cells in peripheral nerves. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;6:671–682. [PubMed]
37. Jiang H SS, Hilt DC. Organization, sequence, and expression of the murine S100 beta gene. Transcriptional regulation by cell type-specific cis-acting regulatory elements. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:20502–20511. [PubMed]
38. Kanaya F, Firrell JC, Breidenbach WC. Sciatic function index, nerve conduction tests, muscle contraction, and axon morphometry as indicators of regeneration. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;98:1264–1271. discussion 1272-1264. [PubMed]
39. Kang H LJ, Newman CS, Thompson WJ, Krieg PA. In vivo imaging of terminal Schwann cells using GFP-expressing transgenic mice. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts. 2000;26
40. Kang H, Thompson W. Schwann cell processes guide axons reinnervating the neuromuscular junction. Soc Neurosci Abs. 2002:234.216.
41. Kang H, Tian L, Thompson W. Terminal Schwann cells guide the reinnervation of muscle after nerve injury. J Neurocytol. 2003;32:975–985. [PubMed]
42. Kobayashi J, Mackinnon SE, Watanabe O, Ball DJ, Gu XM, Hunter DA, Kuzon WM., Jr. The effect of duration of muscle denervation on functional recovery in the rat model. Muscle Nerve. 1997;20:858–866. [PubMed]
43. Le N, Nagarajan R, Wang JY, Araki T, Schmidt RE, Milbrandt J. Analysis of congenital hypomyelinating Egr2Lo/Lo nerves identifies Sox2 as an inhibitor of Schwann cell differentiation and myelination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:2596–2601. [PubMed]
44. Le N, Nagarajan R, Wang JY, Svaren J, LaPash C, Araki T, Schmidt RE, Milbrandt J. Nab proteins are essential for peripheral nervous system myelination. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:932–940. [PubMed]
45. Lichtman JW, Colman H. Synapse elimination and indelible memory. Neuron. 2000;25:269–278. [PubMed]
46. Lichtman JW, Conchello JA. Fluorescence microscopy. Nat Methods. 2005;2:910–919. [PubMed]
47. Lichtman JW, Sanes JR. Watching the neuromuscular junction. J Neurocytol. 2003;32:767–775. [PubMed]
48. Lin FM, Pan YC, Hom C, Sabbahi M, Shenaq S. Ankle stance angle: a functional index for the evaluation of sciatic nerve recovery after complete transection. Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. 1996;12:173–177. [PubMed]
49. Lin W, Burgess RW, Dominguez B, Pfaff SL, Sanes JR, Lee KF. Distinct roles of nerve and muscle in postsynaptic differentiation of the neuromuscular synapse. Nature. 2001;410:1057–1064. [PubMed]
50. Lubischer JL, Bebinger DM. Regulation of terminal Schwann cell number at the adult neuromuscular junction. J Neurosci. 1999;19:RC46. [PubMed]
51. Ludwin SK KJ, Eng LF. The topographical distribution of S-100 and GFA proteins in the adult rat brain:an immunohistochemical study using horseradish peroxidase-labelled antibodies. J Comp Neurol. 1976;165:197–207. [PubMed]
52. Martini R, Schachner M, Brushart TM. The L2/HNK-1 carbohydrate is preferentially expressed by previously motor axon-associated Schwann cells in reinnervated peripheral nerves. J Neurosci. 1994;14:7180–7191. [PubMed]
53. Mears S, Schachner M, Brushart TM. Antibodies to myelin-associated glycoprotein accelerate preferential motor reinnervation. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2003;8:91–99. [PubMed]
54. Miledi R, Slater CR. On the degeneration of rat neuromuscular junctions after nerve section. J Physiol. 1970;207:507–528. [PubMed]
55. Miledi R, Slater CR. Electrophysiology and electron-microscopy of rat neuromuscular junctions after nerve degeneration. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1968;169:289–306. [PubMed]
56. Munro CA, Szalai JP, Mackinnon SE, Midha R. Lack of association between outcome measures of nerve regeneration. Muscle Nerve. 1998;21:1095–1097. [PubMed]
57. Myckatyn TM, MacKinnon SE. A review of research endeavors to optimize peripheral nerve reconstruction. Neurol Res. 2004;26:124–138. [PubMed]
58. Myckatyn TM, Mackinnon SE, Hunter DA, Brakefield D, Parsadanian A. A novel model for the study of peripheral-nerve regeneration following common nerve injury paradigms. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2004;20:533–544. [PubMed]
59. Naveilhan P, ElShamy WM, Ernfors P, Naveilhan P, ElShamy WM, Ernfors P. Differential regulation of mRNAs for GDNF and its receptors Ret and GDNFR alpha after sciatic nerve lesion in the mouse. European Journal of Neuroscience. 1997;9:1450–1460. [PubMed]
60. Nguyen QT, Parsadanian AS, Snider WD, Lichtman JW. Hyperinnervation of neuromuscular junctions caused by GDNF overexpression in muscle. Science. 1998;279:1725–1729. [PubMed]
61. Nguyen QT, Sanes JR, Lichtman JW. Pre-existing pathways promote precise projection patterns. Nat Neurosci. 2002;5:861–867. [PubMed]
62. Nichols CM, Myckatyn TM, Rickman SR, Fox IK, Hadlock T, Mackinnon SE. Choosing the correct functional assay: a comprehensive assessment of functional tests in the rat. Behav Brain Res. 2005;163:143–158. [PubMed]
63. O'Malley JP WM, Balice-Gordon RJ. In vivo observations of terminal Schwann cells at normal, denervated, and reinnervated mouse neuromuscular junctions. J Neurobiol. 1999;38:270–286. [PubMed]
64. Ogata T, Iijima S, Hoshikawa S, Miura T, Yamamoto S, Oda H, Nakamura K, Tanaka S. Opposing extracellular signal-regulated kinase and Akt pathways control Schwann cell myelination. J Neurosci. 2004;24:6724–6732. [PubMed]
65. Pan YA, Misgeld T, Lichtman JW, Sanes JR. Effects of neurotoxic and neuroprotective agents on peripheral nerve regeneration assayed by time-lapse imaging in vivo. J Neurosci. 2003;23:11479–11488. [PubMed]
66. Pun S, Sigrist M, Santos AF, Ruegg MA, Sanes JR, Jessell TM, Arber S, Caroni P. An intrinsic distinction in neuromuscular junction assembly and maintenance in different skeletal muscles. Neuron. 2002;34:357–370. [PubMed]
67. Ramon y Cajal S. Degeneration and regeneration in the nervous system. Oxford University Press; London: 1928.
68. Reddy L. K,S, Sugiura Y, Herrera A, Ko C. Glial Cells Maintain Synaptic Structure and Function and Promote Development of the Neuromuscular Junction In Vivo. Neuron. 2003;40:563–580. [PubMed]
69. Reynolds ML, Woolf CJ. Terminal Schwann cells elaborate extensive processes following denervation of the motor endplate. J Neurocytol. 1992;21:50–66. [PubMed]
70. Ridge RM, Betz WJ. The effect of selective, chronic stimulation on motor unit size in developing rat muscle. J Neurosci. 1984;4:2614–2620. [PubMed]
71. Robitaille R. Modulation of synaptic efficacy and synaptic depression by glial cells at the frog neuromuscular junction. Neuron. 1998;21:847–855. [PubMed]
72. Sanes JR, Lichtman JW. Induction, assembly, maturation and maintenance of a postsynaptic apparatus. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001;2:791–805. [PubMed]
73. Schiaveto De Souza A, Da Silva C, Del Bel E. Methodological evaluation to analyze functional recovery after sciatic nerve injury. J Neurotrauma. 2004;21:627–635. [PubMed]
74. Sendtner M, Gotz R, Holtmann B, Thoenen H. Endogenous ciliary neurotrophic factor is a lesion factor for axotomized motoneurons in adult mice. J Neurosci. 1997;17:6999–7006. [PubMed]
75. Son YJ, Thompson WJ. Schwann cell processes guide regeneration of peripheral axons. Neuron. 1995;14:125–132. [PubMed]
76. Son YJ, Trachtenberg JT, Thompson WJ. Schwann cells induce and guide sprouting and reinnervation of neuromuscular junctions. Trends Neurosci. 1996;19:280–285. [PubMed]
77. Stefansson K WR, Moore BW. Distribution of S-100 protein outside the central nervous system. Brain Res. 1982;234:309–317. [PubMed]
78. Steiner JP, Connolly MA, Valentine HL, Hamilton GS, Dawson TM, Hester L, Snyder SH. Neurotrophic actions of nonimmunosuppressive analogues of immunsuppressive drugs FK506, rapamycin, and cyclosporin A. Nature Medicine. 1997;3:421–428.
79. Taveggia C, Zanazzi G, Petrylak A, Yano H, Rosenbluth J, Einheber S, Xu X, Esper RM, Loeb JA, Shrager P, Chao MV, Falls DL, Role L, Salzer JL. Neuregulin-1 type III determines the ensheathment fate of axons. Neuron. 2005;47:681–694. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
80. Terris DJ, Cheng ET, Utley DS, Tarn DM, Ho PR, Verity AN. Functional recovery following nerve injury and repair by silicon tubulization: comparison of laminin-fibronectin, dialyzed plasma, collagen gel, and phosphate buffered solution. Auris Nasus Larynx. 1999;26:117–122. [PubMed]
81. Tian L, Thompson WJ. Schwann cells induce and guide nerve growth during sprouting in reinnervated soleus muscles in vivo. Soc Neurosci Abstr. 2002;28:234.214.
82. Urbanchek MS, Chung KC, Asato H, Washington LN, Kuzon WM., Jr. Rat walking tracks do not reflect maximal muscle force capacity. J Reconstr Microsurg. 1999;15:143–149. [PubMed]
83. Varejao AS, Cabrita AM, Meek MF, Bulas-Cruz J, Filipe VM, Gabriel RC, Ferreira AJ, Geuna S, Winter DA. Ankle kinematics to evaluate functional recovery in crushed rat sciatic nerve. Muscle & Nerve. 2003;27:706–714. [PubMed]
84. Varejao AS, Cabrita AM, Patricio JA, Bulas-Cruz J, Gabriel RC, Melo-Pinto P, Couto PA, Meek MF. Functional assessment of peripheral nerve recovery in the rat: gait kinematics. Microsurgery. 2001;21:383–388. [PubMed]
85. Varejao AS, Melo-Pinto P, Meek MF, Filipe VM, Bulas-Cruz J. Methods for the experimental functional assessment of rat sciatic nerve regeneration. Neurol Res. 2004;26:186–194. [PubMed]
86. Walsh MK, Lichtman JW. In vivo time-lapse imaging of synaptic takeover associated with naturally occurring synapse elimination. Neuron. 2003;37:67–73. [PubMed]
87. Weinberg, Spencer The fate of Schwann cells isolated from axonal contact. J Neurocytol. 1978;7(5):555–569. [PubMed]
88. Yoshimura K, Asato H, Cederna PS, Urbanchek MG, Kuzon WM. The effect of reinnervation on force production and power output in skeletal muscle. J Surg Res. 1999;81:201–208. [PubMed]
89. Yoshimura K, Asato H, Jejurikar SS, Cederna PS, Urbanchek MG, Kuzon WM., Jr. The effect of two episodes of denervation and reinnervation on skeletal muscle contractile function. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:212–219. [PubMed]
89. Yu P, Matloub HS, Sanger JR, Narini P. Gait analysis in rats with peripheral nerve injury. Muscle & Nerve. 2001;24:231–239. [PubMed]
90. Zuo Y, Lubischer JL, Kang H, Tian L, Mikesh M, Marks A, Scofield VL, Maika S, Newman C, Krieg P, Thompson WJ. Fluorescent proteins expressed in mouse transgenic lines mark subsets of glia, neurons, macrophages, and dendritic cells for vital examination. J Neurosci. 2004;24:10999–11009. [PubMed]