PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jclinpathJournal of Clinical PathologyVisit this articleSubmit a manuscriptReceive email alertsContact usBMJ
 
J Clin Pathol. 2007 July; 60(7): 781–786.
Published online 2006 August 10. doi:  10.1136/jcp.2006.040402
PMCID: PMC1995801

Phenotypic heterogeneity in hereditary non‐polyposis colorectal cancer: identical germline mutations associated with variable tumour morphology and immunohistochemical expression

Abstract

Background

Hereditary non‐polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is associated with high risks for colorectal and endometrial cancer, young age at onset and an increased risk of multiple primary tumours. Colorectal cancer in HNPCC is characterised by poor tumour differentiation, an expanding growth pattern, and a pronounced lymphocytic reaction with tumour‐infiltrating lymphocytes.

Aims and Methods

The mutation spectrum in HNPCC is diverse and in order to clarify whether the HNPCC tumour phenotype is influenced by the underlying genetic alteration, 29 colorectal cancers and 12 adenomas from 24 individuals in two HNPCC families were morphologically and immunohistochemically characterised.

Results

The tumour morphology as well as the immunohistochemical expression of β‐catenin varied extensively within the families as well as between synchronous/metachronous colorectal cancers from the same individual. Poor tumour differentiation, an expanding growth pattern, and tumour‐infiltrating lymphocytes occurred at higher frequencies in proximal tumours, whereas distal colorectal cancers often lacked distinct HNPCC‐associated morphological features.

Conclusions

The clinical, morphological and immunohistochemical variability observed within these families indicates that other mechanisms than the underlying germline mutation influence the HNPCC phenotype. Since morphological features linked to HNPCC are less frequent in distal cancers, it may be particularly relevant to obtain family history and age of onset in these tumours in order to identify individuals with HNPCC.

Keywords: hereditary non‐polyposis colorectal cancer, HNPCC, histopathology, heterogeneity, MMR, mismatch‐repair

Since the identification of mismatch‐repair (MMR) gene mutations as the underlying cause of hereditary non‐polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), close to 500 mutations in more than 700 HNPCC families have been identified worldwide.1 Mutation carriers are estimated to be at 70–80% life‐time risk of colorectal cancer and 40–60% risk of endometrial cancer for female carriers, and also at increased risk for ovarian cancer, urothelial cancer, gastric cancer, cancer of the small intestine, sebaceous adenomas/carcinomas, and gliomas.2,3,4 Although the median age at development of colorectal cancer among probands in HNPCC families is 44 years, the age at diagnosis is highly variable with about 5% of the patients diagnosed before age 25 and at least one‐third of the patients diagnosed after age 60.2,3 An increased risk of extraintestinal tumours has been described in MSH2 mutation carriers, whereas colorectal cancers predominate in individuals with mutations in MLH1.5,6,7 A lower incidence of colorectal cancer and later age at onset has been described in families with mutations in MSH6.8 Despite the large number of HNPCC families identified, no strong genotype–phenotype correlations have been identified and the causes of the phenotypic variability in HNPCC are largely unknown.

A number of histopathological characteristics have been associated with colorectal cancers that develop as part of HNPCC; these characteristics are also overrepresented in the 15% of sporadic colorectal cancers that develop because of defective MMR due to hypermethylation of the MLH1 promoter.9,10,11,12 These characteristics include a proximal tumour location, an expanding growth pattern, poor—sometimes medullary—differentiation, and mucinous histology.9,13,14,15 Additionally, HNPCC tumours tend to show abundant tumour‐infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) and peritumoural lymphocytes, and a Crohn‐like lymphocytic reaction.15,16,17,18 Evaluation of these histopathological features, particularly mucinous, medullary, and poor differentiation and presence of TIL, has been shown to be valuable in predicting colorectal cancers with defective MMR.10,15 However, these features, although originally associated with HNPCC, may be more closely linked to tumours with a somatically acquired MMR defect.11 We therefore histopathologically characterised all available tumours from two HNPCC families with mutations in MLH1 and MSH2, respectively, in order to further clarify genotypic–phenotypic correlations. Because of reports on frequent activation of the wingless (Wnt) signalling pathway in HNPCC‐associated tumours,19 we also chose to investigate the variability of β‐catenin immunostaining in these tumours.

Patients and methods

Patients

Two HNPCC families that had undergone genetic counselling and testing at the Oncogenetic Clinic, Lund University Hospital were included in the study. Family C carried a c.1586delA (p.529fs) in MSH2 and family L carried a c.2141G>A 2141 (p.Trp714STOP) in MLH1. Twenty‐four of the tumours in family C have previously been characterised regarding somatic frameshift alterations.20 Colorectal tumours, including 29 colorectal cancers and 12 colorectal adenomas, from 24 family members were analysed. The mean age at development of the first tumour was 49 (range 23–78) years. Colorectal tumours were, according to tumour localisation, classified as proximal (proximal to the splenic flexure), distal, or rectal (tumours located within 15 cm from the anal canal).

Histopathology

H&E‐stained slides were re‐evaluated by a gastrointestinal pathologist (BH) and the majority of the cases were also reviewed by an additional pathologist (WM). Tumour stage of colorectal cancer was classified according to AJCC/UICC and tumour grade was determined according to the WHO classification.21 Tumours with a mucinous or a signet ring‐cell component identified in >50% of the tumour area were classified as mucinous or signet ring‐cell type and were considered poorly differentiated. If a trabecular, solid or medullary growth pattern or a mucinous or signet ring‐cell component encompassing 10–50% of the tumour area was identified, the tumours were classified as heterogeneous.11,12 The tumour growth pattern was classified as expanding or infiltrative.13 A Crohn‐like infiltrate was defined as three or more nodular lymphoid aggregates deep to the advancing tumour margin within a single ×4 field. Peritumoural lymphocytes were considered to be present when a cap of chronic inflammatory cells was seen in the deep invasive border of the tumour.11 Presence of TIL was defined as [gt-or-equal, slanted]7 TIL/10 HPF (×40) on H&E stained slides. Infiltrating components and hot spot areas were primarily analysed. TIL was not classified in early invasive (pT1sm1) tumours. In colorectal adenomas the grade of dysplasia was classified as high‐grade or low‐grade.21

Immunohistochemical staining

Fresh 4 μm sections were obtained for the immunohistochemical stainings. All tumours were immunohistochemically stained using antibodies against the MMR proteins MLH1 (clone G168‐15, 1:200, BD PharMingen, San Diego, California, USA), PMS2 (clone A16‐4, 1:500, BD PharMingen), MSH2 (clone FE‐11, 1:100, Oncogene Sciences, San Diego, California, USA), and MSH6 (clone 44, 1:1000, BD Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, Kentucky, USA). The EnVision detection kit (Dako Cytomation, Glostrup, Denmark) was used; the staining procedure has previously been described.22 The immunohistochemical MMR protein expression was classified as retained when nuclear staining in the tumour cells was identified, and as lost when the tumour cells showed loss of staining with retained staining in stromal, epithelial, inflammatory, or infiltrating lymphoid cells. The immunostainings for β‐catenin (clone 14, 1:5000, Transduction Laboratories) were performed using the LSAB (labelled streptavidin–biotin) detection kit (Dako Cytomation). β‐catenin staining is normally located to the cell membrane, but translocates to the cytoplasm and further into the nucleus in case of defective adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) directed degradation. β‐catenin staining in the cytoplasm was classified as present or absent, and any nuclear β‐catenin staining was classified as positive.19 Whenever possible (in 26/29 colorectal cancers), the β‐catenin staining was evaluated at the invasive border. All immunostainings were independently and concordantly evaluated by BH and MN.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the statistics package Stata V9.0 (StataCorp 2005, College Station, Texas, USA). Fisher's exact test was used to determine the correlation between morphology and tumour location/age.

Results

Among the colorectal carcinomas, 10/29 (34%) were poorly differentiated, including one mucinous carcinoma, while three tumours were undifferentiated of the medullary type (table 11).). Furthermore, 16/29 (55%) colorectal carcinomas were classified as morphologically heterogeneous, with areas of mucinous or poor differentiation in less than 50% of the tumour tissue (table 11).). Peritumoural lymphocytic infiltration and TIL were observed in 22/28 (79%) and 16/26 (62%) of the tumours, whereas a Crohn‐like lymphocytic reaction was found in 11/25 (44%) tumours. An expanding growth pattern was identified in 17/25 (68%) colorectal carcinomas (table 11).). Several features such as poor tumour differentiation, an expanding growth pattern, and TIL were significantly more often identified in cancers within the proximal colon compared to those in the distal colon or in the rectum (table 22).). Among patients >50 years at diagnosis, an expanding growth pattern occurred at increased frequency (13/15 compared to 4/10 in younger patients, p = 0.03), whereas the other morphological variables did not correlate with age (data not shown). Of the 12 colorectal adenomas investigated, 10 were tubular, 2 were tubulovillous, and 4/12 showed high‐grade dysplasia. The adenomas developed at mean age 65 (range 44–78) years and were equally distributed between the proximal and the distal colon.

Table thumbnail
Table 1 Clinicopathological data in the colorectal cancers
Table thumbnail
Table 2 Fractions of tumours with features in relation to tumour location

Although disease‐causing germline mutations in MSH2 and MLH1 had been identified in all 24 individuals, MMR protein immunostaining was performed in order to confirm an MMR defective phenotype, which was indeed present in all tumours except for one colon cancer and two colon adenomas that showed retained expression of all four MMR proteins investigated; microsatellite instability analysis confirmed a microsatellite stable phenotype in these tumours (table 11).

Cytoplasmic accumulation of β‐catenin was identified in 23/29 (79%) colorectal cancers and in all 12 adenomas; nuclear β‐catenin accumulation was observed in 4 colorectal cancers and 3 adenomas (table 11).

Discussion

Genetic as well as phenotypic heterogeneity characterises HNPCC; mutations in different MMR genes cause morphologically indistinguishable colorectal cancers, but mutations in the same gene may also lead to highly variable phenotypes. In our series, extensive inter‐tumour as well as intra‐tumour heterogeneity for histopathological and immunohistochemical features was identified. Age at onset of colorectal cancer varied from 39 to 78 years in the MSH2 family and from 23 to 61 years in the MLH1 family, with coexistence of early‐onset and late‐onset cancers in both families. A variable age at cancer development has also been observed in families carrying the two Finnish MLH1 founder mutations, which emphasises that factors other than the underlying germline alteration influence the HNPCC phenotype.6

Double primary tumours develop in about one‐third of HNPCC patients; synchronous colorectal cancers develop in 5–10% of the patients and metachronous colorectal cancers in 20–25%, with a mean of 10 years between the different tumours.23 Among the six individuals who developed at least two colorectal cancers, differences in tumour morphology and immunostaining were observed in all cases (table 11,, fig 11).). Three tumours—one colon carcinoma and two adenomas—showed a MSS phenotype with retained immunostaining, which may, particularly for the adenomas, reflect that occasional HNPCC tumours escape identification with currently used methods, which identify defective MMR with a sensitivity of about 95% for carcinomas and 60–70% for adenomas.24

figure cp40402.f1
Figure 1 H&E stained slides (inserted figures ×40) showing variable tumour morphology in metachronous colorectal cancers from patient C6. (A) Rectal cancer with mucinous areas and infiltrating growth, but no tumour‐infiltrating ...

Poor/undifferentiated tumour differentiation has been described in 30–40% of the HNPCC tumours and was in our series identified in 45% of the tumours.9,11,14,25 An expanding tumour margin has also been associated with HNPCC, although not consistently identified as over‐represented, and was in our series observed in 68% of the colorectal cancers.9,14 Morphological heterogeneity with mucinous, signet ring‐cell, or medullary components has been described as a common characteristic within HNPCC tumours and was in our series present in 55% of the tumours.11,15,16 Abundant lymphocytes, which may appear as Crohn‐like reactions, as peritumoural lymphocytes or as TIL are among the features most frequently observed in HNPCC‐associated colorectal cancers.11,12 In our series, TIL were identified in 59% of the colorectal cancers, whereas a Crohn‐like reaction was identified in 44% of the tumours. Assessment of TIL has been described to identify MMR‐defective colorectal cancers with a sensitivity of 75–90%.15,18,25,26 The biological significance of these lymphocytes is still unknown, but may be related to an inflammatory response from cytotoxic T‐cells in MMR‐defective tumours. Differences exist between sporadic and HNPCC‐associated MMR‐defective tumours. Serrated polyps, somatic BRAF gene mutations, and MLH1 methylation characterise the sporadic tumours, whereas conventional colorectal adenomas seem to be the precursor lesions in HNPCC with mutations in APC, β‐catenin, and KRAS occurring at a higher frequency.27 The morphological parameters investigated here have been associated with MMR‐defective tumours in general, but may be particularly associated with somatic MMR defects.

Rectal cancer has been reported to be the index cancer in one out of four HNPCC patients, which stands in contrast to the sporadic MMR‐defective tumours, 90% of which develop in the proximal colon.16,28 In our series, 19 colorectal cancers developed in the proximal colon and 10 in the distal colon or the rectum. Among the HNPCC‐associated features, poor tumour differentiation, an expanding growth pattern, and TIL were significantly more common in proximal than in distal colorectal cancers (table 22).). Hence, identification of HNPCC cases among distal colon cancers based on tumour morphology may be challenging since these tumours often lack distinct HNPCC‐associated features, but at the same time identification of an MMR defective phenotype is more likely to reflect HNPCC in the distal tumours because of a low frequency of somatic MMR defects.

Overactivation of the Wnt signalling pathway favours cell growth. β‐catenin is normally directed to ubiquitin‐mediated degradation through interaction with the APC protein. Since mutations in APC and CTNNB1 occur at high frequency in colorectal cancer, defective β‐catenin expression with cytoplasmic accumulation and nuclear translocation is common, and mutations in the regulatory domain of β‐catenin have been described at an increased frequency in HNPCC‐associated tumours.30 Cytoplasmic accumulation of β‐catenin was identified in 79% of the colorectal cancers and in all adenomas (table 11).). The staining varied between different tumours from the same individual as well as between different family members with identical mutations and seemed equally common in individuals with MLH1 and MSH2 mutations.

We also morphologically and immunohistochemically characterised 9 gynaecological cancers from 8 individuals, 7 of whom carried the MSH2 mutation and 4 of whom also developed colorectal cancers (data not shown). The 7 endometrial cancers developed at a mean age of 49 (range 40–60) years, which is consistent with the reported mean age of 50 years. Poor differentiation, Crohn‐like lymphoid reactions, and TIL are overrepresented in MMR‐defective endometrial cancers, but similarly to colorectal cancer these patterns seem to be more common in the somatically inactivated tumours, whereas the HNPCC‐associated tumours show a more variable morphology.31 Only 1/7 endometrial cancers in our series was poorly differentiated, lymphocytic infiltration was identified in 4, and 6 of the 7 tumours showed cytoplasmic accumulation of β‐catenin staining (data not shown). Ovarian cancers associated with HNPCC are characterised by early tumour development, mean age 41–43 years, which is consistent with the two cases that developed at ages 40 and 45 years.32 Both patients had clear cell cancers of the ovaries and synchronous early stage endometrial cancers of low grade differentiation; because of the distinct morphologies the tumours were in both cases considered to be separate.

Take‐home messages

  • Tumours that develop as part of the hereditary non‐polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) syndrome display extensive heterogeneity, also when caused by identical germline mutations.
  • Other mechanisms than the underlying HNPCC‐causing mutation are likely to influence tumour development and tumour morphology.
  • HNPCC‐associated features, for example poor tumour differentiation, an expanding growth pattern, and tumour‐infiltrating lymphocytes are more common in proximal compared to distal colon cancers.
  • Identification of HNPCC cases among distal colon cancers may be challenging since these tumours often lack the specific histopathological HNPCC‐associated features.

In summary, the histopathological characteristics and the immunohistochemical staining patterns identified indicate extensive phenotypic heterogeneity, which is pronounced between different tumours in one individual as well as between family members with identical underlying germline mutations. Thus, independent modifiers, e.g. different mutations in, for example KRAS or APC, or within genes affected by somatic frameshift mutations may influence tumour development as well as morphology in HNPCC. Our results also suggest that identification of HNPCC cases among distal colon cancers or rectal cancers may be challenging since these tumours often lack specific HNPCC‐associated features such as TIL, expanding growth pattern and poor tumour differentiation.

Acknowledgements

Eva Rambech is acknowledged for performing high‐quality immunostainings and Pär‐Ola Bendahl for help with the statistical analyses.

Abbreviations

APC - adenomatous polyposis coli

HNPCC - hereditary non‐polyposis colorectal cancer

MMR - mismatch repair

TIL - tumour‐infiltrating lymphocytes

Footnotes

Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee at Lund University.

Funding: Financial support was from the Swedish Cancer Society, the Nilsson Cancer Fund, the Kamprad Cancer Fund, and the Region Skåne Research Funds.

Competing interests: None.

References

1. Peltomäki P, Vasen H. Mutations associated with HNPCC predisposition—update of ICG‐HNPCC/INSiGHT database. Dis Markers 2004. 20269–276.276 [PubMed]
2. Hampel H, Stephens J A, Pukkala E. et al Cancer risk in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome: later age of onset. Gastroenterology 2005. 129415–421.421 [PubMed]
3. Parc Y, Boisson C, Thomas G. et al Cancer risk in 348 French MSH2 or MLH1 gene carriers. J Med Genet 2003. 40208–213.213 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Watson P, Lynch H T. Cancer risk in mismatch repair gene mutation carriers. Fam Cancer 2001. 157–60.60 [PubMed]
5. Jager A C, Bisgaard M L, Myrhoj T. et al Reduced frequency of extracolonic cancers in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer families with monoallelic hMLH1 expression. Am J Hum Genet 1997. 61129–138.138 [PubMed]
6. Peltomäki P, Gao X, Mecklin J‐P. Genotype and phenotype in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer: a study of families with different vs. shared predisposing mutations. Fam Cancer 2001. 19–15.15 [PubMed]
7. Vasen H F, Stormoken A, Menko F H. et al MSH2 mutation carriers are at high risk of cancer than MLH1 mutation carriers: a study of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer families. J Clin Oncol 2001. 194074–4080.4080 [PubMed]
8. Plaschke J, Engel C, Kruger S. et al Lower incidence of colorectal cancer and later age of disease onset in 27 families with pathogenic MSH6 germline mutations compared with families with MLH1 or MSH2 mutations: the German hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer Consortium. J Clin Oncol 2004. 224486–4494.4494 [PubMed]
9. Jass J R, Smyrk T C, Stewart S M. et al Pathology of hereditary non‐polyposis colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res 1994. 14(4B)1631–1634.1634 [PubMed]
10. Jass J R, Do K‐A, Simms L A. et al Morphology of sporadic colorectal cancer with DNA replication errors. Gut 1998. 42673–679.679 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Young J, Simms L A, Biden K G. et al Features of colorectal cancers with high‐level microsatellite instability occurring in familial and sporadic settings: parallel pathways of tumorigenesis. Am J Pathol 2001. 1592107–2116.2116 [PubMed]
12. Shia J, Ellis N A, Paty P B. et al Value of histopathology in predicting microsatellite instability in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer and sporadic colorectal cancer. Am J Surg Pathol 2003. 271407–1417.1417 [PubMed]
13. Jass J R, Ajioka Y, Allen J P. et al Assessment of invasive growth pattern and lymphocytic infiltration in colorectal cancer. Histopathology 1996. 28543–548.548 [PubMed]
14. Ruschoff J, Dietmaier W, Luttges J. et al Poorly differentiated colonic adenocarcinoma, medullary type: clinical, phenotypic, and molecular characteristics. Am J Pathol 1997. 1501815–1825.1825 [PubMed]
15. Alexander J, Watanabe T, Wu T ‐ T. et al Histopathological identification of colon cancer with microsatellite instability. Am J Pathol 2001. 158527–535.535 [PubMed]
16. Kim H, Jen J, Vogelstein B, Hamilton S R. Clinical and pathological characteristics of sporadic colorectal carcinomas with DNA replication errors in microsatellite sequences. Am J Pathol 1994. 145148–156.156 [PubMed]
17. Harrison J C, Dean P J, el‐Zeky F. et al Impact of the Crohn's like lymphoid reaction on staging of right‐sided colon cancer: results of multivariate analysis. Hum Pathol 1995. 2631–38.38 [PubMed]
18. Smyrk T C, Watson P, Kaul K. et al Tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes are a marker for microsatellite instability in colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 2001. 912417–2422.2422 [PubMed]
19. Kariola R, Abdel‐Rahman W M, Ollikainen M. et al APC and β‐catenin protein expression patterns in HNPCC‐related endometrial and colorectal cancers. Fam Cancer 2005. 4187–190.190 [PubMed]
20. Planck M, Wenngren E, Borg Å. et al Somatic frameshift alterations in mononucleotide repeat‐containing genes in different tumor types from an HNPCC‐family with germline MSH2 mutation. Genes Chrom Cancer 2000. 2933–39.39 [PubMed]
21. Hamilton S R, Aaltonen L A. eds. World Health Organization classification of tumours, pathology and genetics of tumours of the digestive system. Lyon: IARC Press, 2000. 103–143.143
22. Halvarsson B, Lindblom A, Rambech E. et al The added value of PMS2 immunostaining in the diagnosis of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Fam Cancer 2006. xxxxx
23. Box J C, Rodriguez‐Bigas M A, Weber T K. et al Clinical implications of multiple colorectal carcinomas in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 1999. 42717–721.721 [PubMed]
24. Halvarsson B, Lindblom A, Johansson L. et al Loss of mismatch repair protein immunostaining in colorectal adenomas from patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Mod Pathol 2005. 181095–1101.1101 [PubMed]
25. Michael‐Robinson J M, Biemer‐Hüttmann A‐E, Purdie D M. et al Tumour infiltrating lymphocytes and apoptosis are independent features in colorectal cancer stratified according to microsatellite instability status. Gut 2001. 48360–366.366 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Greenson J K, Boner J D, Ben‐Yzhak O. et al Phenotype of microsatellite unstable colorectal carcinomas: well‐differentiated and focally mucinous tumors and the absence of dirty necrosis correlate with microsatellite instability. Am J Surg Pathol 2003. 27563–570.570 [PubMed]
27. Jass J R. HNPCC and sporadic MSI‐H colorectal cancer: a review of the morphological similarities and differences. Fam Cancer 2004. 393–100.100 [PubMed]
28. Lee J S, Petrelli N J, Rodriguez‐Bigas M A. Rectal cancer in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Am J Surg 2001. 181207–210.210 [PubMed]
29. Van den Bos M, van den Hoven M, Jongejan E. et al More differences between HNPCC‐related and sporadic carcinomas from the endometrium compared to the colon. Am J Surg Pathol 2004. 28706–711.711 [PubMed]
30. Johnson V, Volkios E, Halford S E. et al Exon 3 beta‐catenin mutations are specifically associated with colorectal carcinomas in hereditary non‐polyposis colorectal cancer syndrome. Gut 2005. 54264–267.267 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Broaddus R R, Lynch H T, Chen L M. et al Pathologic features of endometrial carcinoma associated with HNPCC: a comparison with sporadic endometrial carcinoma. Cancer 2006. 10687–94.94 [PubMed]
32. Watson P, Butzow R, Lynch H T. et al The clinical features of ovarian cancer in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2001. 82223–228.228 [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group