PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jclinpathJournal of Clinical PathologyVisit this articleSubmit a manuscriptReceive email alertsContact usBMJ
 
J Clin Pathol. 2007 May; 60(5): 567–569.
PMCID: PMC1994519

A proliferating composite adnexal tumour of the penis: report of the first case

Cutaneous adnexal tumours are largely benign lesions, and are typically classified according to their state of appendageal differentiation as eccrine, apocrine, follicular and sebaceous.1,2 However, rare tumours may display a mixture of eccrine, follicular, sebaceous and apocrine differentiation. Such tumours with varied differentiation are relatively rare.3,4,5,6,7,8,9 The term “combined adnexal tumours of the skin” was proposed by Apisarnthanarax et al.3 Other synonyms include “benign adnexal tumour with multi‐directional differentiation”8 and “benign adnexal tumour of mixed lineage”.1

Clinically, these tumours present as solitary, slowly enlarging dermal or subcutaneous nodules located in the head and neck and in the extremities.1,8 Histologically, they are characterised by well‐circumscribed, non‐encapsulated nodules composed of a lobular proliferation of epithelial cells displaying a spectrum of eccrine, apocrine, sebaceous and follicular differentiation.

We describe a composite adnexal tumour arising in the ventral aspect of the penis, differentiating into follicular and sweat ductal structures.

Case report

A 40‐year‐old man presented with an asymptomatic mass over the ventral aspect of the penis that had enlarged over a period of 5 years to a maximum size of 1.5 cm. The mass was excised and sent for histopathological examination. Low‐power examination revealed epithelial hyperplasia with hyperkeratosis of the surface epithelium. A relatively well‐circumscribed unencapsulated large nodular lesion was seen arising from the epidermis and extending downwards. The lesion was composed of partially solid and partially cystic areas (fig 11).). One area was connected to the surface epithelium and showed cystic invaginations with numerous papillary projections, lined by two rows of cells. The luminal cells were mostly columnar, and showed decapitation secretions. The outer layer was composed of small cuboidal cells. Groups of plasma cells were seen within the papillary cores. The lesion in this area is compatible with syringocystadenoma papilliferum (SCAP) (fig 2A2A).). The overlying epidermis in this area showed hyperplasia, parakeratosis and focal crust formation.

figure cp37192.f1
Figure 1 (A) Composite low‐power view showing partially solid and partially cystic areas (see fig 22 for corresponding areas), H&E ×2.5.
figure cp37192.f2
Figure 2 (A) Cystic area connected to the epidermis, with features of syringocystadenoma papilliferum, H&E ×20. (B) Solid area deep in the dermis, showing peripheral palisading, ductal structures and mitotic activity (arrows), ...

The solid area was located deeply in the dermis, and this formed the bulk of the lesion. It showed a lobular proliferation of epithelial cells, with peripheral palisading of basaloid columnar cells and a distinct eosinophilic rim/mantle. Normal mitotic figures were seen. Some cells within this solid area showed clearing of their cytoplasm, and other areas showed tiny tubular/ductal structures. A hyalinised/oedematous peripheral stroma was also noted. These features closely resembled those of a trichilemmoma (fig 2B2B).

A third area at both sides of the solid area showed proliferation of ductal structures arising from the eccrine ducts (fig 2C2C).). These were lined by two rows of epithelial cells, and were encircled by an eosinophilic cuticle. Granular eosinophilic material was seen in some of these ductal structures.

No infiltrative borders were evident throughout the whole lesion.

Immunohistochemical staining was performed (table 11);); low‐molecular weight keratin, high‐molecular weight human kininogen, cytokeratin 7 and cytokeratin 14 had a mixed but mostly positive reaction in the three areas. P63 was positive in the solid and cystic areas. Epithelial membrane antigen and monoclonal CEA were positive in the area with eccrine ductal proliferation. Epithelial membrane antigen and carcinoembryonic antigen also showed focal positivity, especially in the tubular structures, in the cystic and solid areas. Periodic acid Schiff (PAS) showed a positive reaction with the peripheral hyalinised mantle surrounding the palisading cells of the solid area, and a positive cytoplasmic granular pattern in the clear areas. These granules were diastase sensitive, indicating glycogen deposition. Colloidal iron staining demonstrated mucin deposition in the peripheral stroma surrounding the solid area. MIB1 (a proliferation marker) showed an increased labelling index (~30%), especially in the solid area (fig 33).). CK20, Ber Ep4, oestrogen and progesterone immunostains were negative in the whole lesion.

figure cp37192.f3
Figure 3 Increased labelling index in †the solid area, as illustrated by MIB1, H&E ×10.
Table thumbnail
Table 1 Positive immunohistochemical stains in different areas of the removed lesion

The histological and immunohistochemical features of this lesion demonstrate a proliferating adnexal tumour, which shows a mixture of hair follicular and eccrine gland differentiation, partly resembling syringocystadenoma papilliferum, trichilemmoma and a tumour of proliferating eccrine ductal elements. This type of lesion is best described as a proliferating composite adnexal tumour.

There was no evidence of disease recurrence or metastases 4 months after complete excision.

Discussion

The occurrence of SCAP and composite adnexal tumours of the skin in the external male genitalia is extremely rare, and has only been reported in the scrotum,10,11,12 with no cases reported in the penis. In our patient, there was a composite adnexal tumour removed from the ventral aspect of the penis, showing a combination of SCAP, trichilemmoma and eccrine ductal proliferation.

SCAP is a benign adnexal tumour commonly occurring on the scalp or face, usually in association with nevus sebaceous of Jadassohn. It is characterised by two‐cell‐layered lining papillary projections and stroma filled with plasma cells. SCAP is variably considered to be derived from eccrine, apocrine or apoeccrine origins.1,2 Trichilemmoma is a benign adnexal tumour derived from the external hair sheath.1 It consists of multiple lobules of epithelial cells appearing like an outer root sheath, generally showing pronounced clear cell change. The lesion is bounded by a thickened basement membrane, and the cells in the outer layer are palisaded. When lesions are multiple, a clinical association with various tumours occurs, as in Cowden's disease.

SCAP has been described in association with other adnexal tumours, such as tubular apocrine adenoma,13 papillary eccrine adenoma,11 apocrine cystadenoma14 and tubulopapillary hidradenoma.15 The association of SCAP and trichilemmoma has been reported only three times previously, always in association with nevus sebaceous of Jadassohn, and the reported lesions were not located in the genital area.16,17,18

To our knowledge, the association between SCAP, trichilemmoma and eccrine ductal proliferation has not been reported previously. The occurrence of these three elements together in one lesion can be explained by the common embryological origin of these structures in the primary epithelial germ of the superficial ectoderm.2

Owing to the rarity of these tumours, and the unusual location seen in our patient, the biological behaviour of this lesion is uncertain. However, the patient did not show evidence of disease recurrence or metastases 4 months after excision.

Although this is the first description of a composite adnexal tumour of the skin arising in the penis, the present case also highlights the difficulties encountered in the classification of some benign skin adnexal neoplasms, where more than one cell lineage is encountered. We also recommend the terminology of “composite adnexal tumours of the skin”, to reflect their common embryological origin, and the potential variable combination of eccrine, apocrine, sebaceous and hair follicular differentiation.

Footnotes

Competing interests: None.

References

1. Weedon D. Tumors of cutaneous appendages. In: Weedon D. Skin pathology. 2nd edn. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2002. 859–916.916
2. Klein W, Chan E, Seykora J T. Tumors of the epidermal appendages. In: Elder DE, editor‐in‐chief. Lever's histopathology of the skin. 9th edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wlikins, 2005. 867–926.926
3. Apisarnthanarax P, Bovenmyer D A, Mehregan A H. Combined adnexal tumor of the skin. Arch Dermatol 1984. 120231–233.233 [PubMed]
4. Zaim M T. Sebocrine adenoma. An adnexal adenoma with sebaceous and apocrine poroma‐like differentiation. Am J Dermatopathol 1988. 10311–318.318 [PubMed]
5. Poomeechaiwong S, Bonelli J E, Golitz L E. Mixed tumor of the pilosebaceous type: mixed tumor of the skin with apocrine, follicular and sebaceous differentiation. J Cutan Pathol 1988. 1533–38.38
6. Requena L, Sanchez Y E, Santa Cruz D J. Apocrine type of cutaneous mixed tumor with follicular and sebaceous differentiation. Am J Dermatopathol 1992. 14186–194.194 [PubMed]
7. Sanchez Yus E, Requena L, Simon P. et al Complex adnexal tumor of the primary epithelial germ with distinct patterns of superficial epithelioma with sebaceous differentiation, immature trichoepithelioma, and apocrine adenocarcinoma. Am J Dermatopathol 1992. 14245–252.252 [PubMed]
8. Wong T Y, Suster S, Cheek R F. et al Benign cutaneous adnexal tumors with combined folliculosebaceous, apocrine, and eccrine differentiation: clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of eight cases. Am J Dermatopathol 1996. 18124–136.136 [PubMed]
9. Iwenofu O H, Crowson A N. Pathologic quiz case: cystic tumor of the left eyebrow in a 42‐year‐old woman. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2004. 1281181–1182.1182 [PubMed]
10. Mammino J J, Vidmar D A. Syringocystadenoma papilliferum. Int J Dermatol 1991. 30763–766.766 [PubMed]
11. Coyne J D, Fitzgibbon J F. Mixed syringocystadenoma papilliferum and papillary eccrine adenoma occurring in a scrotal condyloma. J Cutan Pathol 2000. 27199–201.201 [PubMed]
12. Goshima J, Hara H, Okada T. et al Syringocystadenoma papilliferum arising on the scrotum. Eur J Dermatol 2003. 13271
13. Ansai S, Watanabe S, Aso K. A case of tubular apocrine adenoma with syringocystadenoma papilliferum. J Cutan Pathol 1989. 16230–236.236 [PubMed]
14. Schewach‐Millet M, Trau H. Congenital papillated apocrine cystadenoma: a mixed form of hidrocystoma, hidradenoma papilliferum, and syringocystadenoma papilliferum. J Am Acad Dermatol 1984. 11374–376.376 [PubMed]
15. Hsu P J, Liu C H, Huang C J. Mixed tubulopapillary hidradenoma and syringocystadenoma papilliferum occurring as a verrucous tumor. J Cutan Pathol 2003. 30206–210.210 [PubMed]
16. Coskey R J. The spectrum of organoid nevi. Cutis 1982. 29290–294.294 [PubMed]
17. Yoon D H, Jang I G, Kim T Y. et al Syringocystadenoma papilliferum, basal cell carcinoma and trichilemmoma arising from nevus sebaceus of Jadassohn. Acta Dermatol Venereol 1997. 77242–243.243
18. Castilla E A, Bergfeld W F, Ormsby A. Trichilemmoma and syringocystadenoma papilliferum arising in naevus sebaceous. Pathology 2002. 34196–197.197 [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group